Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T12:29:56.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2017

Claus Kreß
Affiliation:
Universität zu Köln
Stefan Barriga
Affiliation:
United Nations, New York
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Crime of Aggression
A Commentary
, pp. 271 - 372
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Augustine, , The City of God, selections reprinted in May, L., Rovie, E. and Viner, S. (eds.), The Morality of War (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2006).Google Scholar
Grotius, H., De Jure Belli ac Pacis (On the Law of War and Peace) (1625), trans. Kelsey, F. W. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1925).Google Scholar
Lackey, D., Ethics of War and Peace (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1988).Google Scholar
May, L., War Crimes and Just War (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
May, L., Aggression and Crimes against Peace (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
More, T., Utopia (1516), eds. Logan, G. M. and Adams, R. M. (Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Newton, M. and May, L., Proportionality in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Rodin, D. and Shue, H. (eds.), Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Surtz, E., Selected Works of St. Thomas More, vol. II (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Tuck, R., The Rights of War and Peace (Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
de Vattel, E., Le droit des gens, ou Principes de la loi naturelle (The Law of Nations, or the Principles of Natural Law) (1758), trans. Fenwick, C. G. (Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution, 1916).Google Scholar
Walzer, M., Just and Unjust Wars (New York: Basic Books, 1977).Google Scholar
Walzer, M., Arguing about War (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

May, L., ‘Jus Post Bellum, Proportionality, and the Fog of War’, European Journal of International Law, 24 (2013), 315–33.Google Scholar
Anzilotti, D., Corso di Diritto Internazionale, 3rd edn (Rome: Athenaeum, 1928).Google Scholar
Cassese, A., International Criminal Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Barriga, S. and Kreß, C. (eds.), The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence, 5th edn (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Glaser, S., Introduction a l’étude de droit internationale pénal (Brussels/Paris: Bruylant/Sirey, 1954).Google Scholar
Glueck, S., War Criminals: Their Prosecution and Punishment (New York: A. A. Knopf, 1944).Google Scholar
Glueck, S., The Nuremberg Trial and Aggressive War (New York: A. A. Knopf, 1946).Google Scholar
Hummrich, M., Der völkerrechtliche Straftatbestand der Aggression (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2001).Google Scholar
Jescheck, H-H., Die Verantwortlichkeit der Staatsorgane nach Völkerstrafrecht (Bonn: Ludwig Röhrscheid, 1952).Google Scholar
May, L., Aggression and Crimes against Peace (Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDougall, C., The Crime of Aggression under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Oppenheim, L. and Roxburgh, R., International Law: A Treatise, vol. I: Peace, 3rd edn (London: Longmans, Green, 1920–21).Google Scholar
Pella, V. V., La criminalité collective des états et le droit pénal de l’avenir (Bucharest: Imprimerie de l’État, 1925).Google Scholar
Pella, V. V., La guerre-crime et les criminels de guerre (Paris: Pedone, 1946).Google Scholar
Schlepple, E., Das Verbrechen gegen den Frieden und seine Bestrafung (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1983).Google Scholar
Sellars, K., ‘Crimes against Peace’ and International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Solera, O., Defining the Crime of Aggression (London: Cameron May, 2007).Google Scholar
Stone, J., Aggression and World Order (London: Stevens, 1958).Google Scholar
Weber, H., Internationale Strafgerichtsbarkeit (Berlin and Bonn: F. Dümmlers Verlag, 1934).Google Scholar
Werle, G. and Jeßberger, F., Principles of International Criminal Law, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. C. and Ferencz, B., ‘The Crime against Peace and Aggression: From its Origins to the ICC’, in Bassiouni, M. C. (ed.), International Criminal Law, vol. I, 3rd edn (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008), 207–42.Google Scholar
Glaser, S., ‘Quelques remarques sur la définition de l’agression en droit international pénal’, in Hohenleitner, S., Linder, L. and Nowakowski, F. (eds.), Festschrift für Theodor Rittler (Scientia, 1957), 383–99.Google Scholar
Kesper-Biermann, S., ‘Die Internationale Kriminalistische Vereinigung’, in Kesper-Biermann, S. (ed.), Die Internationalisierung von Strafrechtswissenschaft und Kriminalpolitik (1870–1930). Deutschland im Vergleich (Berlin: Berliner Wissenschaftsverlag, 2007), 85107.Google Scholar
Röling, B. V. A., ‘Die Definition der Aggression’, in Delbrück, J., Ipsen, K. and Rauschning, D. (eds.), Recht im Dienst des Friedens, Festschrift für Eberhard Menzel zum 65. Geburtstag (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1975), 387403.Google Scholar
Ancel, M., ‘La guerre-crime et les criminels de guerre (Réflexions sur la justice pénale internationale, ce quelle est et ce qu’elle devrait être), par V.-V. Pella’, Revue de Science Criminelle et de Droit Comparé (1946), 330–33.Google Scholar
Cassese, A., ‘On Some Problematical Aspects of the Crime of Aggression’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 20 (2007), 841–49.Google Scholar
Donnedieu de Vabres, H., ‘La Cour Permanente de Justice Internationale et sa vocation en matière criminelle’, Revue Internationale de Droit Pénal, 1 (1924), 175201.Google Scholar
Drumbl, M., ‘The Push to Criminalize Aggression: Something Lost Amid the Gains?’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 41 (2009), 291319.Google Scholar
Duff, R. A., ‘Defining the Crime of Aggression’, Transnational Legal Theory, 1 (2010), 303–7.Google Scholar
Finch, G. A., ‘The Nuremberg Trial and International Law’, American Journal of International Law, 41 (1947), 2037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, S., ‘Droit internationale pénal: son origine, son etat actuel et son développement’, L’indice Pénale (1968), 297318.Google Scholar
Glueck, S., ‘The Nuremberg Trial and Aggressive War’, Harvard Law Review, 59 (1946), 396456.Google Scholar
Gross, L., ‘The Criminality of Aggressive War’, American Political Science Review, 41 (1947), 205–25.Google Scholar
Jessup, P. J., ‘The Crime of Aggression and the Future of International Law’, Political Science Quarterly, 62 (1947), 110.Google Scholar
Levitt, A., ‘A Proposed Code of International Criminal Law’, Revue Internationale de Droit Pénal, 6 (1929), 1865.Google Scholar
Pella, V. V., ‘Plan d’un Code Répressif Mondial’, Revue Internationale de Droit Pénal, 12 (1935), 348–69.Google Scholar
Pella, V. V., ‘Towards an International Criminal Court’, American Journal of International Law, 44 (1950), 3768.Google Scholar
Saldaña, Q., ‘La justice pénale internationale’, Recueils des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International de La Haye, 10 (1925), 223430.Google Scholar
Stone, J., ‘Hopes and Loopholes in the 1974 Definition of Aggression’, American Journal of International Law, 71 (1977), 224–46.Google Scholar
Weigend, T., ‘“In General a Principle of Justice”: The Debate on the “Crime against Peace” in the Wake of the Nuremberg Judgment’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 4158.Google Scholar
Wright, Q., ‘The Concept of Aggression in International Law’, American Journal of International Law, 29 (1935), 373–95.Google Scholar
Association Internationale de Droit Pénal, Resolution III.3, RIDP 3/4 (1926), 465, 466.Google Scholar
International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg), Judgment, 1 October 1946, in The Trial of German Major War Criminals, Proceedings of the International Military Tribunal Sitting at Nuremberg, Germany, Part 22 (1950), at 447.Google Scholar
League of Nations, Protocol for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes, 2 October 1924.Google Scholar
UN Secretary General, ‘Historical Survey of the Question of International Criminal Jurisdiction’, UN Doc. A/CN.4/7/Rev.1 (1949).Google Scholar
Cassese, A., International Criminal Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Corten, O., The Law against War (Oxford: Hart, 2010).Google Scholar
Cryer, R., Friman, H., Robinson, D. and Wilmshurst, E., An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Goodrich, L. M. and Hambro, E., Charter of the United Nations, Commentary and Documents, 2nd edn (Boston, MA: World Peace Foundation, 1949).Google Scholar
Gray, C., International Law and the Use of Force, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Jellinek, G., Allgemeine Staatslehre, 3rd edn (Berlin: O. Häring, 1914).Google Scholar
Kemp, G., ‘Individual Criminal Liability for the International Crime of Aggression’ Doctor of Law dissertation, Stellenbosch University, 2008.Google Scholar
May, L., Aggression and Crimes against Peace (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Roche, D., The Human Right to Peace (Ottawa: Novalis, 2003).Google Scholar
Schmitt, C., Die Wendung zum diskriminierenden Kriegsbegriff (1938), 2nd edn (Berlin: Dunker & Humblot, 1988).Google Scholar
Stone, J., Conflict through Consensus: United Nations Approaches to Aggression (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Werle, G., Völkerstrafrecht, 2nd edn (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007).Google Scholar
de Wet, E., The Chapter VII Powers of the United Nations Security Council (Portland: Hart, 2004).Google Scholar
Barriga, S., ‘Against the Odds: The Results of the Special Working Group on the Crime of Aggression’, in Bellelli, R. (ed.), International Criminal Justice Law and Practice from the Rome Statute to its Review (Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate, 2010), 591608.Google Scholar
Clark, R. S., ‘The Crime of Aggression’, in Stahn, C. and Sluiter, G. (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009), 709–24.Google Scholar
Ferencz, B., ‘The Crime of Aggression’, in McDonald, G. K. and Swaak-Goldman, O. (eds.), Substantive and Procedural Aspects of International Criminal Law: The Experience of International and National Courts (The Hague: Kluwer Law, 2000), 3762.Google Scholar
Fernández de Gurmendi, S. A., ‘An Insider’s View’, in Politi, M. and Nesi, G. (eds.), The International Criminal Court and the Crime of Aggression (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004), 175–88.Google Scholar
Fife, R. E., ‘Criminalizing Individuals for Acts of Aggression Committed by States’, in Bergsmo, M. (ed.), Human Rights and Criminal Justice for the Downtrodden: Essays in Honour of Asbjørn Eide (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2003) 5374.Google Scholar
Fox, H., ‘International Law and Restraints on the Exercise of Jurisdiction by National Courts of States’, in Evans, M. D. (ed.), International Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2006), 361–94.Google Scholar
Gomaa, M. M., ‘The Definition of the Crime of Aggression and the ICC Jurisdiction over that Crime’, in Politi, M. and Nesi, G. (eds.), The International Criminal Court and the Crime of Aggression (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004), 5577.Google Scholar
Kaul, H-P., ‘The Crime of Aggression: Definitional Options for the Way Forward’, in Politi, M. and Nesi, G. (eds.), The International Criminal Court and the Crime of Aggression (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004), 97108.Google Scholar
Kreß, C., ‘The Crime of Aggression before the First Review of the ICC Statute’, in Bellelli, R. (ed.), International Criminal Justice Law and Practice from the Rome Statute to Its Review (Farnham: Ashgate, 2010), 579–90.Google Scholar
Marxen, K., ‘Beteiligung an schwerem systematischem Unrecht’, in Lüderssen, K. (ed.), Aufgeklärte Kriminalpolitik oder der Kampf gegen das Böse?, vol. III: Makrokriminalität (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1995), 220–36.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A., ‘System Criminality in International Law: Introduction’, in Nollkaemper, A. and van der Wilt, H. (eds.), System Criminality in International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2009), 125.Google Scholar
Randelzhofer, A. and Dörr, O., ‘Article 2(4)’, in Simma, B. (ed.), The Charter of the United Nations, A Commentary, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2012), 200–34.Google Scholar
Reisinger Coracini, A., ‘Defining the Crime of Aggression for the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court’, in Stahn, C. and van den Herik, L. (eds.), Future Perspectives on International Criminal Justice (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser, 2010), 425–49.Google Scholar
Strapatsas, N., ‘Rethinking General Assembly Resolution 3314 (1974) as a Basis for the Definition of Aggression under the Rome Statute of the ICC’, in Olusanya, O. (ed.), Rethinking International Criminal Law: The Substantive Part (Groningen: Europa Law, 2007), 153–90.Google Scholar
Strapatsas, N., ‘Complementarity and Aggression: A Ticking Time Bomb?’, in Stahn, C. and van den Herik, L. (eds.), Future Perspectives on International Criminal Justice (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser, 2010), 450–74.Google Scholar
Triffterer, O., ‘Preliminary Remarks’, in Triffterer, O. (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Observers Notes Article by Article, 2nd edn (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2008), 1547.Google Scholar
Triffterer, O. and Bergsmo, M., ‘Preamble’, in Triffterer, O. (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Observers Notes Article by Article, 2nd edn (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2008), 114.Google Scholar
Werle, G., ‘The Crime of Aggression between International and Domestic Criminal Law’, in Manacorda, S. and Nieto, A. (eds.), Criminal Law between War and Peace: Justice and Cooperation in Criminal Matters in International Military Interventions: Proceedings of the XVth International Congress on Social Defense (Cuenca: Ed. de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 2009) 405–21.Google Scholar
Westdickenberg, G. and Fixson, O., ‘Das Verbrechen der Aggression im Römischen Statut des Internationalen Strafgerichtshofes’, in Frowein, J. et al. (eds.), Verhandeln für den Frieden: Liber Amicorum Tono Eitel (Berlin: Springer, 2003), 483525.Google Scholar
Wilmshurst, E., ‘The Crime of Aggression: Custom, Treaty and Prospects for International Prosecution’, in Buffard, I., Crawford, J., Pellet, A. and Wittich, S. (eds.), International Law between Universalism and Fragmentation, Festschrift für Gerhard Hafner (Leiden and Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008), 603–26.Google Scholar
Akande, D., ‘The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over Nationals of Non-Parties: Legal Basis and Limits’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 1 (2003), 618–50.Google Scholar
Akande, D., ‘Prosecuting Aggression: The Consent Problem and the Role of the Security Council’, Oxford Institute for Ethics, Law, and Armed Conflict Working Papers (May 2010), 141.Google Scholar
Ambos, K., ‘The Crime of Aggression after Kampala’, German Yearbook of International Law, 53 (2010), 463509.Google Scholar
Blokker, N., ‘The Crime of Aggression and the United Nations Security Council’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 20 (2007), 867–94.Google Scholar
Boeving, J. N., ‘Aggression, International Law, and the ICC: An Argument for the Withdrawal of Aggression from the Rome Statute’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 43 (2004), 557612.Google Scholar
Bolton, J., ‘The Risks and Weaknesses of the International Criminal Court from America’s Perspective’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 64 (2000), 167–80.Google Scholar
Broms, B., ‘The Definition of Aggression’, Recueil des Cours, 154 (1977), 301–99.Google Scholar
Bush, J. A., ‘“The Supreme Crime” and its Origins: The Lost Legislative History of the Crime of Aggressive War’, Columbia Law Review, 102 (2002), 2324–424.Google Scholar
Carpenter, A. C., ‘The International Criminal Court and the Crime of Aggression’, Nordic Journal of International Law, 64 (1995), 223–42.Google Scholar
Cassese, A., ‘On Some Problematical Aspects of the Crime of Aggression’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 20 (2007), 841–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, G. M., ‘Defining Substantive Crimes within the Subject Matter Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court: What is the Crime of Aggression?’, New York Law School Journal of International and Comparative Law, 19 (2000), 413–52.Google Scholar
DeNicola, C. P., ‘A Shield for the Knights of Humanity: The ICC Should Adopt a Humanitarian Necessity Defense to the Crime of Aggression’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 30 (2008), 641–89.Google Scholar
Ferencz, B., ‘Can Aggression be Deterred by Law?’, Pace International Law Review, 11 (1999), 341–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferencz, B., ‘Bringing the Crime of Aggression within the Active Jurisdiction of the ICC’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 42 (2009), 531–42.Google Scholar
Ferencz, B., ‘The Crime of Aggression: Some Personal Reflections on Kampala’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 23 (2010), 905–08.Google Scholar
Fletcher, K. M., ‘Defining the Crime of Aggression: Is there an Answer to the International Criminal Court’s Dilemma?’, Air Force Law Review, 65 (2010), 229–62.Google Scholar
Glennon, M. J., ‘The Blank-Prose Crime of Aggression’, Yale Journal of International Law, 35 (2011), 71114.Google Scholar
Heinsch, R., ‘The Crime of Aggression after Kampala: Success or Burden for the Future’, Goettingen Journal of International Law, 2 (2010), 713–43.Google Scholar
Hogan-Doran, J. and van Ginkel, B. T., ‘Aggression as a Crime under International Law and the Prosecution of Individuals by the Proposed International Criminal Court’, Netherlands International Law Review, 43 (2009), 321–51.Google Scholar
Jessup, P. C., ‘The Crime of Aggression and the Future of International Law’, Political Science Quarterly, 62 (1947), 110.Google Scholar
Kreß, C., ‘The Crime of Aggression before the First Review Conference of the ICC Statute’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 20 (2007), 851–65.Google Scholar
Kreß, C., ‘The Crime of Genocide and Contextual Elements. A Comment on the ICC Pre-Trial Chamber’s Decision in the Al Bashir Case’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 7 (2009), 297306.Google Scholar
Kreß, C., ‘Major Post-Westphalian Shifts and Some Important Neo-Westphalian Hesitations in the State Practice on the International Law on the Use of Force’, Journal on the Use of Force and International Law, 1 (2014), 1154.Google Scholar
McCormack, T. and Simpson, G. J., ‘A New International Criminal Law Regime?’, Netherlands International Law Review, 42 (1995), 177206.Google Scholar
McDougall, C., ‘When Law and Reality Clash – the Imperative of Compromise in the Context of the Accumulated Evil of the Whole: Conditions for the Exercise of the International Criminal Court’s Jurisdiction over the Crime of Aggression’, International Criminal Law Review, 7 (2007), 277333.Google Scholar
McMahon, J., ‘Just Causes for War’, Ethics and International Affairs, 19(3) (2005), 121.Google Scholar
Morris, M., ‘High Crimes and Misconceptions: The International Criminal Court and Non-Party States’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 64 (2000), 1366.Google Scholar
Morris, M., ‘The Democratic Dilemma of the International Criminal Court’, Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 5 (2002), 591–99.Google Scholar
Müller-Schieke, I. K., ‘Defining the Crime of Aggression under the Statute of the International Criminal Court’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 14 (2001), 409–30.Google Scholar
Nsereko, D. D. N., ‘Defining the Crime of Aggression: An Important Agenda Item for the Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court’, Acta Juridica, (2003), 256–86.Google Scholar
O’Connell, M. E. and Niyazmatov, M., ‘What is Aggression? Comparing the Jus ad Bellum and the ICC Statute’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 189207.Google Scholar
Paulus, A. L., ‘Second Thoughts on the Crime of Aggression’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2010), 1117–28.Google Scholar
Politi, M., ‘The Establishment of an International Criminal Court at a Crossroads: Issues and Prospects after the First Session of the Preparatory Committee’, Nouvelles Etudes Pénales, 13 (1997), 115–57.Google Scholar
Rayfuse, R., ‘The Draft Code of Crimes against the Peace and Security of Mankind: Eating Disorders at the International Law Commission’, Criminal Law Forum, 8 (1997), 4386.Google Scholar
Reisinger Coracini, A., ‘The International Criminal Court’s Exercise of Jurisdiction Over the Crime of Aggression – at Last … in Reach … Over Some’, Goettingen Journal of International Law, 2(2) (2010), 745–89.Google Scholar
Schabas, W., ‘United States Hostility to the International Criminal Court: It’s all about the Security Council’, European Journal of International Law, 15 (2004), 701–20.Google Scholar
Schuster, M., ‘The Rome Statute and the Crime of Aggression: A Gordian Knot in Search of a Sword’, Criminal Law Forum, 14 (2003), 157.Google Scholar
Simma, B., ‘NATO, the UN and the Use of Force: Legal Aspects’, European Journal of International Law, 10 (1999), 122.Google Scholar
Stahn, C., ‘The “End”, the “Beginning of the End” or the “End of the Beginning”? Introducing Debates and Voices on the Definition of ‘Aggression’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 23 (2010), 875–82.Google Scholar
Stein, M. S., ‘The Security Council, the International Criminal Court, and the Crime of Aggression: How Exclusive is the Security Council’s Power to Determine Aggression?’, Indiana International and Comparative Law Review, 16 (2005), 136.Google Scholar
Tladi, D., ‘Kampala, the International Criminal Court and the Adoption of a Definition of the Crime of Aggression: A Dream Deferred’, South African Yearbook of International Law, 35 (2010), 8096.Google Scholar
Trahan, J., ‘Defining “Aggression”: Why the Preparatory Commission for the International Criminal Court Has Faced such a Conundrum’, Loyola of Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Review, 24 (2002), 439–74.Google Scholar
Trahan, J., ‘The Rome Statute’s Amendment on the Crime of Aggression: Negotiations at the Kampala Review Conference’, International Criminal Law Review, 11 (2011), 49104.Google Scholar
Trahan, J., ‘A Meaningful Definition of the Crime of Aggression: A Response to Michael Glennon’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 33 (2012), 907–69.Google Scholar
van der Vyver, J., ‘Prosecuting the Crime of Aggression in the International Criminal Court’, University of Miami National Security & Armed Conflict Law Review, 1 (2011), 156.Google Scholar
Van Schaack, B., ‘The Crime of Aggression and Humanitarian Intervention on Behalf of Women’, International Criminal Law Review, 11 (2011), 477–93.Google Scholar
Van Schaack, B., ‘Par in Parem Imperium Non Habet. Complementarity and the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 133–64.Google Scholar
Villarino Villa, C., ‘The Crime of Aggression before the House of Lords: Chronicle of a Death Foretold’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 4 (2006), 866–77.Google Scholar
Walzer, M., ‘The Crime of Aggressive War’, Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 6 (2007) 635–43.Google Scholar
Wedgwood, R., ‘The Irresolution of Rome’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 64 (2001), 193214.Google Scholar
Wellens, K., ‘The UN Security Council and New Threats to the Peace: Back to the Future’, Conflict & Security Law, 8 (2003), 1570.Google Scholar
Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), ICJ Reports (2005), 168.Google Scholar
Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), ICJ Reports (2007), 43.Google Scholar
Case Concerning East Timor (Portugal v. Australia), ICJ Reports (1995), 90.Google Scholar
Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), ICJ Reports (1984), 392.Google Scholar
Monetary Gold Removed from Rome in 1943 (Italy v. France, United Kingdom and United States), ICJ Reports (1954), 19.Google Scholar
Permanent Court of Criminal Justice, The Case of the SS ‘Lotus’, PCIJ Series A, No. 10.Google Scholar
Prosecutor v. Akayesu, Judgment, ICTR-96–4-T, 2 October 1998, available online at www.ictr.org.Google Scholar
Prosecutor v. Al Bashir, Warrant of Arrest for Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir, ICC-02/05-01/09-1, 4 March 2009.Google Scholar
Prosecutor v. Al Bashir, Decision Pursuant to Article 87(7) of the Rome Statute on the Failure by the Republic of Malawi to Comply with the Cooperation Requests Issued by the Court with Respect to the Arrest and Surrender of Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir, ICC-02/05-01/09, 12 December 2011.Google Scholar
Prosecutor v. Al Bashir, Decision on the Cooperation of the Democratic Republic of the Congo Regarding Omar Al Bashir’s Arrest and Surrender to the Court, ICC-02/05-01/09, 9 April 2014.Google Scholar
Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Decision on Victim’s Participation, ICC-01/04–01/06, 18 January 2008.Google Scholar
Prosecutor v. Muthaura/Kenyatta/Ali, Decision on the Application by the Government of Kenya Challenging the Admissibility of the Case Pursuant to Article 19(2)(b) of the Statute, ICC-01/09–02/11 OA, 30 August 2011, para. 43.Google Scholar
House of Lords, R v. Jones [2006] UKHL 16.Google Scholar
United States of America v. Alfried Krupp et al., in United Nations War Crimes Commission (ed.), Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, vol. X (London, 1949).Google Scholar
African Union, Draft Protocol on Amendments to the Protocol on the Statute of the African Court of Justice and Human Rights, adopted June 2014, EX.CL/846(XXV), Annex 5.Google Scholar
Final Report to the Prosecutor by the Committee Established to Review the NATO Bombing Campaign Against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, published 13 June 2000, available at: www.un.org/icty.Google Scholar
General Assembly, Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law, 21 March 2006, UN Doc. A/RES/60/147.Google Scholar
General Assembly, Promotion of a Democratic and Equitable International Order, 18 March 2009, UN Doc. A/RES/63/189.Google Scholar
General Assembly, Right of People to Peace, 12 November 1984, UN Doc. A/RES/39/11.Google Scholar
General Assembly, World Summit Outcome, 24 October 2005, UN Doc. A/RES/60/1.Google Scholar
International Criminal Court, Office of the Prosecutor, ‘Paper on Some Policy Issues before the Office of the Prosecutor’, September 2001, The Hague.Google Scholar
International Criminal Court, Office of the Prosecutor, ‘Strategic Plan’, June 2012–2015, The Hague.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Draft Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations’, Yb ILC (2011), vol. II(2), 1.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the Commission to the General Assembly’, Yb ILC (1950), vol. II, 364.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the Commission to the General Assembly on the Work of its Forty-Third Session’, Yb ILC (1991), vol. II(2), 1.Google Scholar
Judgment of the International Military Tribunal for the Trial of Major German War Criminals, American Journal of International Law, 41 (1947), 172.Google Scholar
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, ICJ Reports (1996), 226.Google Scholar
Security Council, Resolution 496 (1981) concerning Seychelles, 15 December 1981, UN Doc. S/RES/496.Google Scholar
Security Council, Resolution 808 (1993) concerning International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY), 22 February 1993, UN Doc. S/RES/808.Google Scholar
Security Council, Resolution 1368 (2001) concerning Threats to International Peace and Security Caused by Terrorist Acts, 12 September 2001, UN Doc. S/RES/1368.Google Scholar
Security Council, Resolution 1674 (2006) concerning Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict, 28 April 2006, UN Doc. S/RES/1674.Google Scholar
Security Council, Resolution 1894 (2009) concerning Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict, 11 November 2009, UN Doc. S/RES/1894.Google Scholar
Security Council, Resolution 1970 (2011) concerning Peace and Security in Africa, 26 February 2011, UN Doc. S/RES/1970.Google Scholar
Security Council, Resolution 1973 (2011) concerning Libya, 17 March 2011, UN Doc. S/RES/1973.Google Scholar
Situation in the Republic of Kenya, Decision Pursuant to Article 15 of the Rome Statute on the Authorization of an Investigation into the Situation in the Republic of Kenya, ICC-01/09, 31 March 2010.Google Scholar
Slaughter, A-M., ‘Good Reasons for Going Around the UN’, New York Times, 18 March 2003.Google Scholar
Statement by Harold Hongju Koh, Legal Advisor, United States Department of State, Regarding Crime of Aggression at the Resumed Eighth Session of the Assembly of States Parties of the International Criminal Court, 23 March 2010, available at: http://usun.state.gov/briefing/statements/2010/139000.htm.Google Scholar
Statement by Harold Hongju Koh at the Review Conference of the International Criminal Court, ICC Review Conference, 4 June 2010, available at: www.state.gov/s/l/releases/remarks/142665.htm.Google Scholar
Kearney, M., The Prohibition of Propaganda for War in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
ICRC, The Fundamental Principles of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 1996).Google Scholar
Eide, A., ‘Article 28’, in Alfredsson, G. and Eide, A. (eds.), Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1999), 597632.Google Scholar
Symonides, J., ‘New Human Rights Dimensions, Obstacles and Challenges: Introductory Remarks’, in Symonides, J. (ed.), Human Rights: New Dimensions and Challenges (Paris: UNESCO, 1998), 125.Google Scholar
Tickhonov, A. A., ‘The Inter-Relationship Between the Right to Life and the Right to Peace: Nuclear Weapons and Other Weapons of Mass-Destruction and the Right to Life’, in Ramcharan, B. G. (ed.), The Right to Life in International Law (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1985), 97113.Google Scholar
ICRC, ‘Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law, Adopted by the Assembly of the International Committee of the Red Cross on 26 February 2009’, International Review of the Red Cross, 90 (2008), 9911047.Google Scholar
Nanda, V. P., ‘Nuclear Weapons and the Right to Peace Under International Law’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 9 (1983), 283–96.Google Scholar
Pictet, J., ‘The Fundamental Principles of the Red Cross: Commentary’, International Review of the Red Cross, 19 (1979), 130–49.Google Scholar
Sajoo, A. B., ‘Human Rights Perspectives on the Arms Race’, McGill Law Journal, 28 (1982), 628–50.Google Scholar
Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), ICJ Reports (2005), 168.Google Scholar
Corfu Channel Case (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v. People’s Republic of Albania), ICJ Reports (1949), 4.Google Scholar
ECtHR, Akhmadov et al. v. Russia, Judgment, No. 21586/02, 14 November 2008.Google Scholar
ECtHR, Albekov et al. v. Russia, Judgment, No. 68216/01, 9 October 2008.Google Scholar
ECtHR, Arzu Akhmadova et al. v. Russia, Judgment, No. 13670/03, 8 January 2009.Google Scholar
ECtHR, Isayeva v. Russia, Judgment, No. 57950/00, 24 February 2005.Google Scholar
ECtHR, Isayeva, Yusopova and Bazayeva v. Russia, Judgment, Nos. 57947/00, 57948/00 and 57949/00, 24 February 2005.Google Scholar
ECtHR, Sejdić and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Bonello, Nos. 27996/06 and 34836/06 [GC], 22 December 2009.Google Scholar
ECtHR, Umayeva v. Russia, Judgment, No. 1200/03, 4 December 2008.Google Scholar
ECtHR, Varnava and Others v. Turkey, Judgment, Nos. 16064/90, 16065/90, 16066/90, 16068/90, 16069/90, 16070/90, 16071/90, 16072/90 and 16073/90 [GC], 18 September 2009.Google Scholar
Amnesty International, International Criminal Court, Concerns at the Seventh Session of the Assembly of States Parties, October 2008, Index: IOR 40/022/2008.Google Scholar
Congressional Record, 1941, vol. 87, Pt. I.Google Scholar
Director General of UNESCO, Report on the Result of the International Consultation of Governmental Experts on the Human Right to Peace, delivered to Executive Board, 17 April 1998, UN Doc. 154 EX/40.Google Scholar
ECOSOC, Commission on Human Rights, Drafting Committee on an International Bill of Human Rights, 1st Session. Draft Outline of International Bill of Rights (prepared by the Division of Human Rights), 4 June 1947, UN Doc. E/CN.4/AC.1/3.Google Scholar
ECOSOC, Commission on Human Rights, Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, 48th Session. International Peace and Security as an essential Condition for the Enjoyment of Human Rights, above all the Right to Life, 25 November 1996, UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/RES/1996/16.Google Scholar
ECOSOC, Commission on Human Rights, Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, 49th Session. International Peace and Security as an essential Condition for the Enjoyment of Human Rights, above all the Right to Life, 28 August 1997, UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/RES/1997/36.Google Scholar
ECOSOC, Commission on Human Rights, Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, 57th Session. Working Paper on the Relationship between Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law by Françoise Hampson and Ibrahim Salama, 21 June 2005, UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2005/14.Google Scholar
ECOSOC, Commission on Human Rights, 58th Session. Promotion of the Right of Peoples to Peace, 25 April 2002, UN Doc. E/CN.4/RES/2002/71.Google Scholar
ECOSOC, Commission on Human Rights, 61st Session. Promotion of Peace as a Vital Requirement for the full Enjoyment of all Human Rights by All, 20 April 2005, UN Doc. E/CN.4/RES/2005/56.Google Scholar
Explanation of vote by Germany (on behalf of EU) concerning UN Doc. A/HRC/11/L.11, 17 June 2009, available at: www.un.org/webcast/unhrc/archive.asp?go=090617.Google Scholar
Explanation of vote by Slovenia (on behalf of EU) concerning UN Doc. A/HRC/8/L.13, 18 June 2008, available at: www.un.org/webcast/unhrc/archive.asp?go=080618.Google Scholar
General Assembly, Declaration on the Right of Peoples to Peace, 12 November 1984, UN Doc. A/RES/39/11, Annex.Google Scholar
General Assembly, Promotion of the Right of Peoples to Peace, 27 February 2003, UN Doc. A/RES/57/216.Google Scholar
General Assembly, Promotion of Peace as a Vital Requirement for the full Enjoyment of all Human Rights by All, 16 December 2005, UN Doc. A/RES/60/163.Google Scholar
General Assembly, Human Rights Council, 8th Session. Promotion of the Right of Peoples to Peace, 18 June 2008, UN Doc. A/HRC/RES/8/9.Google Scholar
General Assembly, Human Rights Council, 11th Session. Promotion of the Right of Peoples to Peace, 17 June 2009, UN Doc. A/HRC/RES/11/4.Google Scholar
General Assembly, Human Rights Council, 11th Session. Implementation of Human Rights Council Resolution 8/9 on the Promotion of the Right of Peoples to Peace, Note by the Secretariat, 17 March 2009, UN Doc. A/HRC/11/38.Google Scholar
General Assembly, Human Rights Council, 14th Session. Report of the Office of the High Commissioner on the Outcome of the Expert Workshop on the Right of Peoples to Peace, 17 March 2010, UN Doc. A/HRC/14/38.Google Scholar
General Assembly, Human Rights Council, 14th Session. Promotion of the Right of Peoples to Peace, 23 June 2010, UN Doc. A/HRC/RES/14/3.Google Scholar
General Assembly, Human Rights Council, 17th Session. Progress Report of the Human Rights Council Advisory Committee on the Right of Peoples to Peace, 1 April 2011, UN Doc. A/HRC/17/39.Google Scholar
General Assembly, Human Rights Council, 17th Session. Promotion of the Right of Peoples to Peace, 15 July 2011, UN Doc. A/HRC/RES/17/16.Google Scholar
General Assembly, Human Rights Council, 20th Session. Report of the Human Rights Council Advisory Committee on the Right of Peoples to Peace, 16 April 2012, UN Doc. A/HRC/20/31.Google Scholar
General Assembly, Human Rights Council, 20th Session. Promotion of the Right to Peace, 17 July 2012, UN Doc. A/HRC/RES/20/15.Google Scholar
General Assembly, Human Rights Council, Open-ended Inter-Governmental Working Group on the Right to Peace, 1st Session. Report of the Open-ended Inter-Governmental Working Group on the Draft United Nations Declaration on the Right to Peace, 26 April 2013, UN Doc. A/HRC/WG.13/1/2.Google Scholar
General Assembly, 49th Session, Security Council, 49th Year. First Annual Report of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, 29 August 1994, UN Doc. A/49/342-S/1994/1007.Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee, General Comment 6, Article 6, 16th Session (1982), UN Doc. HRI/GEN/1/Rev.6 (2003) 127.Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee, General Comment 14, Article 6, 23rd Session (1984), UN Doc. HRI/GEN/1/Rev.6 (2003) 139.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch, Memorandum for the Sixth Session of the Assembly of States Parties of the International Criminal Court, November 2007.Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report to the General Assembly on the Work of its First Session, 12 April–9 June 1949’, UN Doc. A/CN.4/13 (1949).Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 6th Meeting’, UN Doc. A/CN.4/SR.6 (1949).Google Scholar
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Advisory Opinion), ICJ Reports (2004), 136.Google Scholar
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (Advisory Opinion), ICJ Reports (1996), 226.Google Scholar
Office of the Prosecutor, Policy Paper on the Interests of Justice, September 2007.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×