Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T03:24:43.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Constitutional implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Geoffrey Brennan
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Loren Lomasky
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University, Ohio
Get access

Summary

What should governments be allowed to do? What is the appropriate sphere of political action? How large a share of national product should be available for political disposition? What sort of political decision structures should be adopted at the constitutional stage? Under what conditions and to what extent should individuals be franchised?

These questions and many others like them clearly depend for answers on some positive, predictive analysis of how different political institutions will operate. An informed and meaningful theory of constitutions cannot be constructed until and unless there exists some theory of the operation of alternative political rules.

James Buchanan, “Politics Without Romance”

The normative dimension

How extended should the domain of politics be? Should democracy be representative or direct? What is the case for a federal as opposed to a centralized polity? How should power be distributed among the various parts of the state apparatus? What are the pros and cons of bicameralism?

Such questions are the very stuff of political theory, whether in the public choice variant or in the more traditional form familiar from political science and political philosophy. Whatever other ambitions it may have, political theory aspires to provide the resources for evaluating alternative ways of organizing political life.

Of course, public choice – and more generally political theory in the rational actor tradition – goes about its normative theorizing in a distinctive way. It imports from economics an attempted dichotomy between “positive” and “normative” analysis, and it embodies that dichotomy in a kind of two-stage procedure for normative theorizing.

Type
Chapter
Information
Democracy and Decision
The Pure Theory of Electoral Preference
, pp. 199 - 225
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×