Abbott, K. W. 1999. “International Relations Theory, International Law, and the Regime Governing Atrocities in Internal Conflicts,” American Journal of International Law 93 (2): 361–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abbott, K. W. and Snidal, D. 2000. “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance,” International Organization 54 (3): 421–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aceves, W. J. 2000. “Liberalism and International Legal Scholarship: The Pinochet Case and the Move Toward a Universal System of Transnational Law Litigation,” Harvard International Law Journal 41 (1): 129–84Google Scholar

Adler, E. and Haas, P. M. 1992. “Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program,” International Organization 46 (1): 367–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alston, L. 2000. “A Framework for Understanding the New Institutional Economics,” unpublished paper

Alter, K. and Meunier, S. 2009. “The Politics of International Regime Complexity,” Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvarez, J. 2002. “The New Treaty Makers,” Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 25 (2): 213–34Google Scholar

Alvarez, J. 2005. International Organizations as Law-makers. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

,American Society of International Law 1998. Trilateral Perspectives on International Legal Issues: From Theory into Practice. Ardsley, NY: Transnational PublishersGoogle Scholar

Anghie, A. 2004. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Annan, K. 2000. We the Peoples: The Role of the United Nations in the 21st Century. New York: United NationsGoogle Scholar

Arend, A. 1999. Legal Rules and International Society. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Arrieta, J. I. 2000. Governance Structures within the Catholic Church. Montreal: Wilson & LafleurGoogle Scholar

Arzt, D. and Lukashuk, I. 1995. “Participants in International Legal Relations,” in Damrosch, L. F., Danilenko, G., and Mullerson, R. (eds.), Beyond Confrontation: International Law for the Post-Cold War Era. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 61–92Google Scholar

Aust, A. 2005. Handbook of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Avdeyera, O. 2007. “When Do States Comply with International Treaties? Policies on Violence against Women in Post-Communist Countries,” International Studies Quarterly 51 (4): 877–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aviel, J. F. 2000. “Placing Human Rights and Environmental Issues on ASEAN Agenda: The Role of Non-Governmental Organizations,” Asian Journal of Political Science 8 (2): 17–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aviram, A. 2004. “A Paradox of Spontaneous Formation: The Evolution of Private Legal Systems,” Yale Law and Policy Review 22 (1): 1–68Google Scholar

Axelrod, R. and Keohane, R. 1985. “Achieving Cooperation Under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions,” in Oye, K. (ed.), Cooperation Under Anarchy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 226–54Google Scholar

Barnett, M. 1995. “The United Nations and Global Security: The Norm is Mightier than the Sword,” Ethics and International Affairs 9: 37–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnett, M. and Finnemore, M. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar

Barrett, S. 2003. Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-making. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, S. 2007. Why Cooperate? The Incentive to Supply Global Public Goods. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumgartner, F. and Jones, B. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Beck, R. 1996. “International Law and International Relations: The Prospects for Interdisciplinary Collaboration,” in Beck, R., Arend, A., and Lugt, R. Vander (eds.), International Rules: Approaches from International Law and International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–33Google Scholar

Bederman, D. J. 2001. International Law in Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bederman, D. J. 2002. The Spirit of International Law. Athens, GA: University of Georgia PressGoogle Scholar

Bentham, J. 1970. Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham. Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A. (eds.). London: Athlone PressGoogle Scholar

Berman, P. S. 2005. The Globalization of International Law. London: AshgateGoogle Scholar

Berman, P. S. 2007a. “Global Legal Pluralism,” Southern California Law Review 80 (6): 1155–1238Google Scholar

Berman, P. S. 2007b. “A Pluralist Approach to International Law,” Yale Journal of International Law 32 (2): 301–29Google Scholar

Bianchi, A. 1999. “Immunity and Human Rights: The Pinochet Case,” European Journal of International Law 10 (2): 237–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bodin, J. 1992. On Sovereignty: Four Chapters from the Six Books of the Commonwealth, (ed. and trans.) Franklin, J. H.. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boulding, K. 1985. The World as a Total System. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Boutros-Ghali, B. 1995. An Agenda for Peace. New York: United NationsGoogle Scholar

Bradlow, D. 2005. “Private Complainants and International Organizations: A Comparative Study of the Independent Inspection Mechanisms in International Financial Institutions,” Georgetown Journal of International Law 36 (2): 403–94Google Scholar

Breen, C. 2003. “The Role of NGOs in the Formulation of and Compliance with the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict,” Human Rights Quarterly 25 (2): 453–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brierly, J. L. 1963. The Law of Nations: An Introduction to the International Law of Peace, 6th edn. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Brunnée, J. 2004. “The United States and International Environmental Law: Living with an Elephant,” European Journal of International Law 15 (4): 617–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunnée, J. and Toope, S. J. 2000. “International Law and Constructivism: Elements of an International Theory of International Law,” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 39 (1): 19–74Google Scholar

Buergenthal, T. 1997. “Modern Constitutions and Human Rights Treaties,” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 36 (1/2): 211–24Google Scholar

Buergenthal, T. 2006. “The Evolving International Human Rights System,” American Journal of International Law 100 (4): 783–807Google Scholar

Bull, H. 1977. The Anarchical Society. New York: Columbia University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bunn, I. D. 2004. “Global Advocacy for Corporate Accountability: Transatlantic Perspectives from the NGO Community,” American University International Law Review 19 (6): 1256–1306Google Scholar

Burci, G. L. 2005. “Institutional Adaptation without Reform: WHO and the Challenges of Globalization,” International Organizations Law Review 2: 437–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burke-White, W. 2002. “A Community of Courts: Toward a System of International Criminal Law Enforcement,” Michigan Journal of International Law 24: 1–101Google Scholar

Burley(Slaughter), A. M. and Mattli, W. 1993. “Europe before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration,” International Organization 47 (1): 41–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cakmak, C. 2004. “The Role of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in the Norm Creation Process in the Field of Human Rights,” Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations 3 (1): 100–22Google Scholar

Calabresi, G. 1961. “Some Thoughts on Risk Distribution and the Law,” Yale Law Journal 70 (3): 499–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Capoccia, G. and Keleman, D. 2007. “The Study of Critical Junctures. Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism,” World Politics 59 (April): 341–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carr, E. H. 1964. The Twenty Years' Crisis: 1919–1939. New York: Harper & RowGoogle Scholar

Cassese, A. 1986. International Law in a Divided World. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Charlesworth, H., C. M. Chinkin, and S. Wright 1999. “Feminist Methods in International Law,” American Journal of International Law 93 (2): 379–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charney, J. I. 1993. “Universal International Law,” American Journal of International Law 87 (4): 529–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charney, J. I. 1999. “The Proliferation of Courts and Tribunals: Piercing Together the Puzzle,” New York University Journal of International Law 31: 697–708Google Scholar

Charnovitz, S. 2006. “Nongovernmental Organizations and International Law,” American Journal of International Law 100 (2): 348–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chayes, A. and Chayes, A. H. 1993. “On Compliance,” International Organization 47 (2): 175–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chayes, A. and Chayes, A. H. 1995. The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Chayes, A., Ehrlich, T., and Lowenfeld, A. 1968. International Legal Process: Materials for an Introductory Course. Boston: Little, Brown and CompanyGoogle Scholar

Chinkin, C. M. 1989. “The Challenge of Soft Law: Development and Change in International Law,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 38: 850–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chinkin, C. M. 2000. “Normative Development in the International Legal System,” in Shelton, D. (ed.), Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-binding Norms in the International Legal System. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 21–42Google Scholar

Cioffi-Revilla, C. 1998. “The Political Uncertainty of Interstate Rivalries: A Punctuated Equilibrium Model,” in Diehl, P. F. (ed.), The Dynamics of Enduring Rivalries. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 64–97Google Scholar

Claude, I. L. 1966. “Collective Legitimization as a Political Function of the United Nations,” International Organization 20 (2): 367–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coase, R. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost,” Journal of Law and Economics 3 (1): 1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, C. P. 1990. “The Role of Nongovernmental Organizations in the Drafting of the Convention on the Rights of the Child,” Human Rights Quarterly 12 (1): 137–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, M., March, J., and Olsen, J. 1972. “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice,” Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (1): 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colaresi, M. 2001. “Shocks to the System: Great Power Rivalry and the Leadership Long-cycle,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (5): 569–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, R. 2004. “Dynamic Content: The Strategic Contingency of International Law,” Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 14 (1): 89–123Google Scholar

Cooter, R. and Ulen, T. 1987. Law and Economics. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley LongmanGoogle Scholar

Cover, R. 1983. “The Supreme Court, 1982 Term – Foreword: Nomos and Narrative,” Harvard Law Review 97 (1): 4–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, R. W. and Jacobson, H. K. 1973. The Anatomy of Influence: Decision Making in International Organization. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Crawford, J. 2002. The International Law Commission's Articles on State Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Crow, M. E. 2004. “Smokescreens and State Responsibility: Using Human Rights Strategies to Promote Global Tobacco Controls,” Yale Journal of International Law 29 (1): 209–50Google Scholar

Dahl, R. A. 1998. On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Dai, X. 2007. International Institutions and National Policies. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damrosch, L. 2004. “Brief of International Law Experts and Former Diplomats as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner,” Appeal from the District Court of Oklahoma, County, State of Oklahoma, CF-1993–4302

Damrosch, L. F. and Oxman, B. H. 2004. “Editors' Introduction to Agora: The United States Constitution and International Law,” American Journal of International Law 98 (1): 42–3Google Scholar

Danner, A. M. 2006. “When Courts Make Law: How the International Criminal Tribunal Recast the Law of War,” Vanderbilt Law Review 59 (1): 1–57Google Scholar

Deehr, M. 1991. “A Proposal for the International Monitoring of Potential Genocide Conditions,” Wisconsin International Law Journal 9 (2): 491–514Google Scholar

Dessler, D. 1989. “What's at Stake in the Agent–Structure Debate?” International Organization 43 (2): 441–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deutsch, K. and Singer, J. D. 1964. “Multipolar Power Systems and International Stability,” World Politics 16 (3): 390–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diehl, P. F. 2001. “International Law: Stepchild in Social Science Research,” International Studies Review 3 (1): 4–9Google Scholar

Diehl, P. F. and Goertz, G. 2000. War and Peace in International Rivalry. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downs, G., Rocke, D., and Barsoom, P. 1996. “Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation?” International Organization 50 (3): 379–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dubinsky, P. 2005. “Human Rights Law Meets Private Law Harmonization,” Yale Journal of International Law 30 (1): 211–317Google Scholar

Duffield, J. 2003. “The Limits of Rational Design,” International Organization 57 (2): 413–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunoff, J. and Trachtman, J. 1999. “The Law and Economics of Humanitarian Law Violations in Internal Conflict,” American Journal of International Law 93 (2): 394–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durant, R. and Diehl, P. F. 1989. “Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policy: Lessons from the US Foreign Policy Arena,” Journal of Public Policy 9 (2): 179–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eldredge, N. 1985. Time Frames: The Evolution of Punctuated Equilibria. Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Eldredge, N. 1995. Reinventing Darwin: The Great Evolutionary Debate. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar

Ellickson, R. 1991. Order Without Law. How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Evans, P. B., Jacobson, H. K., and Putnam, R. 1993 (eds.). Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press

Fauchald, O. K. 2008. “The Legal Reasoning of ICSID Tribunals: An Empirical Analysis,” European Journal of International Law 19 (2): 301–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fawcett, J. E. S. 1968. The Law of Nations. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar

Fearon, J. 1998. “Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation,” International Organization 52 (2): 269–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferstman, C. 1997. “Domestic Trials for Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity: The Example of Rwanda,” African Journal of International and Comparative Law 9 (4): 857–77Google Scholar

Finlayson, J. and Zacher, M. 1981. “The GATT and the Regulation of Trade Barriers: Regime Dynamics and Functions,” International Organization 35 (4): 561–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finnemore, M. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar

Franck, T. M. 1990. The Power of Legitimacy among Nations. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Friedmann, W. 1966. The Changing Structure of International Law. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar

Gamble, J. K. 1980. “Reservations to Multilateral Treaties: A Macroscopic View of State Practice,” American Journal of International Law 74 (2): 372–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gamble, J. K. 2006. “The Comprehensive Statistical Database of Multilateral Treaties (CSDMT) Project.” Paper presented at the Shambaugh Conference, “Building Synergies: Institutions and Cooperation in World Politics,” Iowa City, IA

Genco, S. 1980. “Integration Theory and System Change in Western Europe: The Neglected Role of Systems Transformation Episodes,” in Holsti, O., Siverson, R., and George, A. L. (eds.), Change in the International System. Boulder, CO: Westview, pp. 55–80Google Scholar

George, A. L. 1979. “The Causal Nexus between Cognitive Beliefs and Decision-Making Behavior: The ‘Operational Code’ Belief System,” in Falkowski, L. (ed.), Psychological Models in International Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview, pp. 104–24Google Scholar

George, A. L. and McKeown, T. 1985. “Case Studies and Theories of Organizational Decision Making,” in Coulam, R. and Smith, R. A. (eds.), Advances in Information Processing in Organizations, vol. II, Research on Public Organizations. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 21–58Google Scholar

Gilligan, M. 2006. “Is Enforcement Necessary for Effectiveness? A Model of the International Criminal Regime,” International Organization 60 (4): 935–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginsburg, T. 2005. “Bounded Discretion in International Judicial Lawmaking,” Virginia Journal of International Law 45 (3): 631–73Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T. 2006. “Locking in Democracy. Constitutions, Commitment, and International Law,” International Law and Politics 38: 707–59Google Scholar

Giorgia, G. 1992. “Positivism and Dualism in Dionisio Anzilotti,” European Journal of International Law 3 (1): 123–38Google Scholar

Goertz, G. 2003. International Norms and Decision Making: A Punctuated Equilibrium Model. Oxford: Rowman and LittlefieldGoogle Scholar

Goertz, G. and Diehl, P. F. 1992. “Toward a Theory of International Norms: Some Conceptual and Measurement Issues,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 36 (4): 634–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goertz, G., Jones, B., and Diehl, P. F. 2005. “Maintenance Processes in International Rivalries,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 49 (5): 742–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goertz, G. and Starr, H. 2002. Necessary Conditions: Theory, Methodology, and Applications. Lanham, MD: Rowman and LittlefieldGoogle Scholar

Goldsmith, J. and Posner, E. 2005. The Limits of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, J., Kahler, M., Keohane, R. O., and Slaughter, A. M. 2000. “Legalization and World Politics,” International Organization 54 (3): 401–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, S. J. 1983. Hen's Teeth and Horse's Toes. New York: W. W. NortonGoogle Scholar

Gould, S. J. and Eldredge, N. 1993. “Punctuated Equilibrium Comes of Age,” Nature 366: 223–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Green, S. 1997. “A Campaign to Sweep Away Danger,” Chronicle of Philanthropy (20 October): 60Google Scholar

Gross, L. 1948. “The Peace of Westphalia, 1648–1948,” American Journal of International Law 42 (1): 20–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grotius, H. 1925. “De jure belli ac pacis. Libri tres,” (trans.) Kelwey, F. W., in Scott, J. B. (ed.), The Classics of International Law. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Gruber, L. 2005. “Power Politics and the Institutionalization of International Relations,” in Barnett, M. and Duvall, R. (eds.), Power in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 102–29Google Scholar

Guzman, A. 2005. “The Design of International Agreements,” European Journal of International Law 16 (4): 579–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guzman, A. 2008. How International Law Works. A Rational Choice Theory. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haas, E. 1990. When Knowledge is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organizations. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Haas, P. M. 1992. “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination,” International Organization 46 (1): 1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, P. and Thelen, K. 2006. “Institutional Change in Varieties of Capitalism.” Paper presented for the Europeanists Conference, Chicago

Halperin, M. 1974. Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings InstitutionGoogle Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. 1994. The Concept of Law, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Hasenclever, A., Mayer, P., and Rittberger, V. 1997. Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hathaway, O. A. 2007. “Why Do Countries Commit to Human Rights Treaties?” Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 (4): 588–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawkins, D. 2004. “Explaining Costly International Institutions: Persuasion and Enforceable Human Rights Norms,” International Studies Quarterly 48: 779–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heldring, F. 1988. “Can the US Dollar Survive as a World Reserve Currency?” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 500: 23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helfer, L. R. 2005. “Exiting Treaties,” Virginia Law Review 91 (7): 1579–1648Google Scholar

Helfer, L. R. 2006. “Response: Not Fully Committed? Reservations, Risk, and Treaty Design,” Yale Journal of International Law 31 (2): 367–82Google Scholar

Helfer, L. R. 2008a. “Nonconsensual International Lawmaking,” Illinois Law Review 102 (1): 71–125Google Scholar

Helfer, L. R. 2008b. “Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime,” European Journal of International Law 19 (1): 125–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helfer, L. and Slaughter, A. M. 2005. “Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response to Professors Posner and Yoo,” California Law Review 93 (3): 901–56Google Scholar

Henkin, L. 1968. How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar

Henkin, L. 1995. International Law: Politics and Values. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff PublishersGoogle Scholar

Henkin, L. and Hargrove, J. L. 1994 (eds.). Human Rights: An Agenda for the Next Century. Washington, DC: American Society for International Law

Higgins, R. 1968. “Policy Considerations and the International Judicial Process,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 17 (1): 58–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higgins, R. 1994. Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Hollis, D. B. 2005. “Why State Consent Still Matters: Non-State Actors, Treaties, and the Changing Sources of International Law,” Berkeley Journal of International Law 23 (1): 137–74Google Scholar

Huntington, S. P. 1991. The Third Wave. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma PressGoogle Scholar

Ikenberry, G. J. and Kupchan, C. 1990. “Socialization and Hegemonic Power,” International Organization 44 (3): 283–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,International Law Association, 1998. Committee on Cultural Heritage. Report of the Sixty-Eighth Conference. Available at http://whc. unesco.org/archive/repcom99.htm

Janis, M. W. 1988/1993. An Introduction to International Law. Boston: Little, Brown and CompanyGoogle Scholar

Jennings, R. Y. 1938. “The Caroline and McLeod Cases,” American Journal of International Law 32 (10): 82–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jervis, R. 1997. System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Joyner, C. C. 2006. “International Law Is as International Theory Does?” American Journal of International Law 100 (1): 248–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joyner, C. C. 2007. “The Responsibility to Protect: Humanitarian Concerns and the Lawfulness of Armed Intervention,” Virginia Journal of International Law 47 (3): 693–724Google Scholar

Kader, D. 1991. “Progress and Limitations in Basic Genocide Law,” in Charny, I. (ed.), Genocide: A Critical Bibliographical Review, vol. II. London: Mansell, pp. 141–5Google Scholar

Kaldor, M. 2003. Global Civil Society: An Answer to War. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, M. A. 1957. System and Process in International Politics. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar

Keck, M. E. and Sikkink, K. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar

Kegley, C. 2008. World Politics: Trend and Transformation. Boston, MA: Thomson/WadsworthGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, D. 1986. “Primitive Legal Scholarship,” Harvard Journal of International Law 27 (1): 1–98Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. 1997. “New Approaches to Comparative Law: Comparativism and International Governance,” Utah Law Review 2: 545–637Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. and Tennant, C. 1994. “New Approaches to International Law: A Bibliography,” Harvard Journal of International Law 35 (2): 417–60Google Scholar

Kent, H. S. K. 1954. “The Historical Origins of the Three-Mile Limit,” American Journal of International Law 48 (4): 537–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keohane, R. 1980. “The Theory of Hegemonic Stability and Changes in International Economic Regimes, 1967–1977,” in Holsti, O., Siverson, R., and George, A. (eds.), Change in the International System. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 131–62Google Scholar

Keohane, R. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Keohane, R. 1986 (ed.). Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press

Keohane, R. and Nye, J. 2000. “Introduction,” in Nye, J. and Donahue, J. D. (eds.), Governance in a Globalizing World. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 18–20Google Scholar

Kindleberger, C. 1973. The World in Depression, 1929–1939. London: Penguin PressGoogle Scholar

Kingdon, J. W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Harper CollinsGoogle Scholar

Kirsch, P. 2007. “The Role of the International Criminal Court in Enforcing International Criminal Law,” American University International Law Review 22: 539–47Google Scholar

Kissinger, H. 2001. “The Pitfalls of Universal Jurisdiction,” Foreign Affairs 80 (4): 86–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klir, G. and Yuan, B. 1995. Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications. New York: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar

Klotz, A. 1995. Norms in International Relations: The Struggle against Apartheid. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar

Koenig, C. 1991. “Observer Status for the ICRC at the United Nations: A Legal Viewpoint,” International Review of the Red Cross 280: 37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koh, H. 1997. “Why Do Nations Obey International Law?” Yale Law Journal 106: 2599–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koh, H. 2002. “Opening Remarks: Transnational Legal Process Illuminated,” in Likosky, M. (ed.), Transnational Legal Process: Globalisation and Power Disparities. London: Butterworths, pp. 327–32Google Scholar

Konig, T. and Hug, S. 2000. “Ratifying Maastricht,” European Union Politics 1 (1): 93–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., and Snidal, D. 2003 (eds.). The Rational Design of International Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Koskienniemi, M. 2001. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krasner, S. 1983 (ed.). International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press

Krasner, S. 1984. “Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics,” Comparative Politics 16 (2): 223–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kriehbiel, K. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krisch, N. and Kingsbury, B. 2006. “Introduction: Global Governance and Global Administrative Law in the International Legal Order,” European Journal of International Law 17 (1): 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ku, C. 2007. “Strengthening International Law's Capacity to Govern through Multilayered Strategic Partnerships,” South African Yearbook of International Law 33: 107–23Google Scholar

Ku, C. and Borgen, C. 2000. “American Lawyers and International Competence,” Dickinson Journal of International Law 18 (3): 493–515Google Scholar

Ku, C. and Gamble, J. K. 2000. “International Law – New Actors and New Technologies: Center Stage for NGOs?” Law and Policy in International Business 32 (2): 221–62Google Scholar

Ku, C. and Jacobson, H. K. 2003. Democratic Accountability and the Use of Force in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ku, C. and Weiss, T. 1998. Towards Understanding Global Governance: The International Law and International Relations Toolbox. Waterloo, ON: Academic Council on the United Nations SystemGoogle Scholar

Larsen, J. 2004. “Importing Constitutional Norms from a ‘Wider Civilization’: Lawrence and the Rehnquist Court's Use of Foreign and International Law in Domestic Constitutional Interpretation,” Ohio State Law Journal, 65: 1283–1327Google Scholar

Lasswell, H. and McDougal, M. 1992. Jurisprudence for a Free Society: Studies in Law, Science, and Policy. Dordrecht: Kluwer LawGoogle Scholar

Lazlo, E. 1983. General Systems Theory. New York: BrazillerGoogle Scholar

Leben, C. 1998. “Hans Kelsen and the Advancement of International Law,” European Journal of International Law 9 (2): 287–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar

LeBlanc, L. 1991. The United States and the Genocide Convention. Durham, NC: Duke University PressGoogle Scholar

Lippman, M. 1998. “The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide: Fifty Years Later,” Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 15: 415–514Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. 1988. “The Unity of the Legal System,” in Teubner, G. (ed.), Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 12–35Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. 2004. Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

March, J. G. and Simon, H. A. 1958. Organizations. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar

Martens, G. F. 1803. The Law of Nations, Founded on the Treaties and Customs of the Modern Nations of Europe: With the Science of National Law, Covenant, Power, etc. to Which is Added, a Complete List of all the Treaties, Conventions, Compacts, Declarations, etc. from the Year 1731 to 1802 Inclusive, Indicating the Several Works in Which They are to be Found. London: E. JeffreyGoogle Scholar

Martin, L. and Simmons, B. 1998 (eds.). International Institutions. An International Organization Reader. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Martin de Agar, J. T. 2007. Handbook on Canon Law. Montreal: Wilson & LafleurGoogle Scholar

Mathews, J. T. 1997. “Power Shift,” Foreign Affairs 76 (1): 50–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McAdams, R. H. 1997. “The Origin, Development, and Regulation of Norms,” Michigan Law Review 96 (2): 338–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDougal, H. and Lasswell, D. 1959. “The Identification and Appraisal of Diverse Systems of Public Order,” American Journal of International Law 53 (1): 1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mearsheimer, J. 1994–5. “The False Promise of International Institutions,” International Security 19 (3): 5–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, J. and Page, S. 2007. Complex Adaptive Systems. Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Mingst, K. 2003. “Domestic Political Factors and Decisions to Use Military Forces,” in Ku, C. and Jacobson, H. K. (eds.), Democratic Accountability and the Use of Force in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 61–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, R. 2002. “A Quantitative Approach to Evaluating International Environmental Regimes,” Global Environmental Politics 2 (4): 58–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, S. 1973. “Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Field of Study,” Law and Society Review 7: 719–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgenthau, H. 1948. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: KnopfGoogle Scholar

Murphy, P. 2008. “Excluding Justice or Facilitating Justice? International Criminal Law Would Benefit From Rules of Evidence,” International Journal of Evidence and Proof 12: 1–31Google Scholar

Nussbaum, A. 1954. A Concise History of the Law of Nations. New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar

O'Connell, M. E. 1999. “New International Legal Process,” American Journal of International Law 93 (2): 334–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Onuma, Y. 2003. “International Law in and with International Politics: The Functions of International Law in International Society,” European Journal of International Law 14 (1): 105–39Google Scholar

Oppenheim, L. 1955. International Law: A Treatise, 8th edn. Lauterpacht, H. (ed.). New York: David McKay Company, vol. IGoogle Scholar

Otto, D. 1996. “Nongovernmental Organizations in the United Nations System: The Emerging Role of Civil Society,” Human Rights Quarterly 18 (1): 17–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Page, S. 2006. “Path Dependence,” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1 (1): 87–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pahre, R. 1999. Leading Questions: How Hegemony Affects the International Political Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pahre, R. 2006 (ed.). Democratic Foreign Policy Making: Problems of Divided Government and International Cooperation. New York: PalgraveCrossRef

Peterson, M. J. 1992. “Whalers, Cetologists, and the International Management of Whaling,” International Organization 46 (1): 147–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pevehouse, J., Nordstrom, T., and Warnke, K. 2004. “The COW-2 International Organizations Dataset Version 2.0,” Conflict Management and Peace Science 21 (2): 101–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierson, P. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Posner, E. and Yoo, J. 2005. “Judicial Independence in International Tribunals,” California Law Review 93 (2): 957–73Google Scholar

Posner, M. 2005/6. “President's Letter,” Human Rights First 2005/06 Annual ReportGoogle Scholar

Posner, R. 2007. Economic Analysis of Law. New York: Aspen PublishersGoogle Scholar

Price, R. 1998. “Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines,” International Organization 52 (3): 613–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ratner, S. and Abrams, J. S. 1997. Accountability for Human Rights Atrocities in International Law: Beyond the Nuremberg Legacy. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Ratner, S. and Slaughter, A. M. 1999. “Appraising the Methods of International Law: A Prospectus for Readers,” American Journal of International Law 93 (2): 291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raustiala, K. 2005. “Form and Substance in International Agreements,” American Journal of International Law 99 (3): 581–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reisman, M. W. and Armstrong, A. 2006. “The Past and Future of the Claim of Pre-emptive Self-defense,” American Journal of International Law 100 (3): 525–50Google Scholar

Reus-Smit, C. 2004. “The Politics of International Law,” in Reus-Smit, C. (ed.), The Politics of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 14–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rhodes, R., Binder, S., and Rockman, B. 2006. Oxford Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Roberts, Adam 1999. “NATO's Humanitarian War,” Survival 3: 102–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, Anthea 2001. “Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation,” American Journal of International Law 95 (3): 757–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogers, C. A. 2005. “The Vocation of the International Arbitrator,” American University International Law Review 20 (5): 957–1020Google Scholar

Root, E. 1911. “The Function of Private Codification in International Law,” American Journal of International Law 5 (3): 577–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rottleuthner, H. 1988. “Biological Metaphors in Legal Thought,” in Teubner, G. (ed.), Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 97–127Google Scholar

Rovine, A. 1976. Digest of United States Practice in International Law. Washington, DC: Office of the Legal Advisor, Department of StateGoogle Scholar

Rutherford, K. R. 2000. “The Evolving Arms Control Agenda: Implications of the Role of NGOs in Banning Antipersonnel Landmines,” World Politics 5 (3): 74–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Augustine, Saint 1958. City of God. Bourke, V. J. (ed.). New York: Image BooksGoogle Scholar

Salacuse, J. W. and Sullivan, N. P. 2005. “Do BITs Really Work? An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain,” Harvard International Law Journal 46 (1): 67–130Google Scholar

Sandholtz, W. and Stiles, K. 2009. International Norms and Cycles of Change. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Sandholtz, W. and Sweet, A. S. 2004. “Law, Politics, and Global Governance,” in Reus-Smit, C. (ed.), The Politics of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 238–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sassen, S. 2006. Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Satzer, J. 2007. “Explaining the Decreased Use of International Courts: The Case of the ICJ,” Review of Law and Economics 3 (1): 11–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scelle, G. 1932. Droit International Public. Paris: Les Éditions Dorat MontchretienGoogle Scholar

Schachter, O. 1991. International Law in Theory and Practice. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff PublishersGoogle Scholar

Selden, J. 2003. Of the Dominion, or, Ownership of the Sea. (trans.) Nedham, M.. Clark, NJ: Lawbook ExchangeGoogle Scholar

Shaffer, G. 2004. “Recognizing Public Goods in WTO Dispute Settlement: Who Participates? Who Decides? The Case of TRIPS and Pharmaceutical Patent Protection,” Journal of International Economic Law 7 (2): 459–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shaffer, G. 2005. “Power, Governance, and the WTO: A Comparative Institutional Approach,” in Barnett, M. and Duvall, R. (eds.), Power in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 130–60Google Scholar

Shanks, C., Jacobson, H. K., and Kaplan, J. H. 1996. “Inertia and Change in the Constellation of International Governmental Organizations, 1981–1992,” International Organization 50 (3): 593–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shaw, M. 2008. International Law, 6th edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shelton, D. 1994. “The Participation of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Judicial Proceedings,” American Journal of International Law 88: 611–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shelton, D. 2000 (ed.). Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-binding Norms in the International Legal System. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Shelton, D. 2006. Remedies in International Human Rights Law, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepsle, K. A. and Weingast, B. 1995. Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sikkink, K. 1993. “Human Rights, Principled Issue-Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America,” International Organization 47 (3): 411–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sikkink, K. 1998. “Transnational Politics, International Relations Theory, and Human Rights,” PS: Political Science and Politics 31 (3): 517–21Google Scholar

Simma, B. 1995. “The Contribution of Alfred Verdross to the Theory of International Law,” European Journal of International Law 6 (1): 33–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simma, B. and Paulus, A. 1999. “The Responsibility of Individuals for Human Rights Abuses in Internal Conflicts: A Positivist View,” American Journal of International Law 93 (2): 302–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simmons, B. 2000. “International Law and State Behavior: Commitment and Compliance in International Monetary Affairs,” American Political Science Review 94 (4): 819–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simmons, B. 2001. “International Law – Stepchild in Social Science Research? A Rejoinder to Paul Diehl,” International Studies Review 3 (1): 9–14Google Scholar

Singer, J. D. and Wallace, M. 1970. “Inter-Governmental Organization and the Preservation of Peace, 1816–1965: Some Bivariate Relationships,” International Organization 24 (3): 520–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siverson, R. 1980. “War and Change in the International System,” in Holsti, O., Siverson, R., and George, A. L. (eds.), Change in the International System. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 211–29Google Scholar

Slaughter, A. M. 1993. “Regulating the World: Multilateralism, International Law, and the Projection of the New Deal Regulatory State,” in Ruggie, J. G. (ed.), Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 125–56Google Scholar

Slaughter, A. M. 1997. “The Real New World Order,” Foreign Affairs 76: 183–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slaughter, A. M. 1998. “International Law and International Relations Theory: A New Generation of Interdisciplinary Scholarship,” American Journal of International Law 92 (3): 367–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slaughter, A. M. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Slaughter, A. M. and Bosco, D. 2002. “Plaintiff's Diplomacy,” Foreign Affairs 79 (5): 102–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slaughter, A. M. and Burke-White, W. 2006. “The Future of International Law is Domestic (or, the European Way of Law),” Harvard International Law Journal 47 (2): 327–52Google Scholar

Stein, A. 1990. Why Nations Cooperate: Circumstances and Choices in International Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar

Steinbrunner, J. 1974. The Cybernetic Theory of Decision: New Dimensions of Political Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Stiles, K. W. 2006. “The Power of Procedure and the Procedures of the Powerful: Anti-Terror Law in the United States,” Journal of Peace Research 43 (1): 37–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Streeck, W. and Thelen, K. 2005. “Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies,” in Streeck, W. and Thelen, K. (eds.), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–39Google Scholar

Sylvest, C. 2004. “International Law in Nineteenth-Century Britain,” British Yearbook of International Law 75: 9–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taft, W. H., IV and Buchwald, T. B. 2003. “Preemption, Iraq, and International Law,” American Journal of International Law 97 (3): 557–63Google Scholar

Taylor, P. 1987. “Prescribing for the Reform of International Organization: The Logic of Argument for Change,” Review of International Studies 13: 19–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teubner, G. 1988. (ed.) Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter

Teubner, G. 1993. Law as an Autopoietic System. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Thelen, K. 2004. How Institutions Evolve. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thelen, K. 2006. “Institutions and Social Change: The Evolution of Vocational Training in Germany,” in Shapiro, I., Skowronek, S., and Galvin, D. (eds.), Rethinking Political Institutions: The Art of the State. New York: New York University Press, pp. 135–70Google Scholar

Thelen, K. and Steinmo, S. 1992. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics,” in Steinmo, S., Thelen, K., and Longstreth, F. (eds.), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–32Google Scholar

Thierry, H. 1990. “The Thought of George Scelle,” European Journal of International Law 1 (1/2): 193–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tipson, F. S. 1974. ‘The Lasswell–McDougal Enterprise: Toward a World Order of Human Dignity,” Virginia Journal of International Law 14: 535–85Google Scholar

Trachtman, J. 2008. The Economic Structure of International Law. Harvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsebelis, G. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

,United Nations General Assembly 2006. “Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law,” Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission. Finalized by M. Koskienniemi (April 13), A/CN.4/L.682.0

Schaack, B. 1997. “Crime of Political Genocide: Repairing the Convention's Blindspot,” Yale Law Journal 106 (7): 2259–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vick, D. 2002. “The Human Rights Act and the British Constitution,” Texas International Law Journal 37: 329–72Google Scholar

Waldron, J. 2005. “Foreign Law and Modern Ius Gentium,” Harvard Law Review 119: 129–47Google Scholar

Walker, T. A. 1893. The Science of International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Waltz, K. 1964. “The Stability of a Bipolar World,” Daedalus 93 (3): 881–909Google Scholar

Waltz, K. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw HillGoogle Scholar

Waters, M. 2007. “Normativity in the ‘New’ Schools: Assessing the Legitimacy of International Legal Norms Created by Domestic Courts,” Yale Journal of International Law 32: 455–84Google Scholar

Weil, P. 1983. “Towards Relative Normality in International Law,” American Journal of International Law 77 (3): 413–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weintraub, R. 2002. “Introduction to Symposium on International Forum Shopping,” Texas International Law Journal 37 (3): 463–67Google Scholar

Weiss, E. B. and Jacobson, H. K. 1998. Engaging Countries: Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Weiss, T. 2007. Humanitarian Intervention: Ideas in Action. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar

Weiss, T. and Shaw, T. 1998 (eds.). Beyond UN-Subcontracting: Task-Sharing with Regional Security Arrangements and Service Providing NGOs. London: MacmillanCrossRef

Wendt, A. 2003. “Driving with the Rearview Mirror: On the Rational Science of Institutional Design,” in Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., and Snidal, D. (eds.), The Rational Design of International Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 259–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Westfield, E. 2001–2. “Globalization, Governance, and Multinational Enterprise Responsibility: Corporate Codes of Conduct in the 21st Century,” Virginia Journal of International Law 42: 1075–1108Google Scholar

Whewell, W. 1853. “Editor's Preface,” in Whewell, W. (ed.), Hugo Grotius, De Jure Belli et Pacis Libri Tres. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Widmaier, W., Blyth, M., and Seabrooke, L. 2007. “Exogenous Shocks or Endogenous Constructions? The Meaning of Wars and Crises,” International Studies Quarterly 51 (4): 747–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiessner, S. and Willard, A. 1999. “Policy-Oriented Jurisprudence and Human Rights Abuses in Internal Conflict: Toward a World Public Order of Human Dignity,” American Journal of International Law 93 (2): 316–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolff, C. 1934. “Introduction,” in Nippold, O. (ed.), Drake, J. (trans.), Jus Gentium Methodo Scientifica Pertractatum. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Young, O. 1989a. International Cooperation: Building Regimes for Natural Resources and the Environment. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar

Young, O. 1989b. “The Politics of International Regime Formation: Managing Natural Resources and the Environment,” International Organization 43 (3): 349–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zartman, I. W. 2000. “Ripeness: The Hurting Stalemate and Beyond,” in Stern, P. and Druckman, D. (eds.), International Conflict Resolution after the Cold War. Washington: National Academy Press, pp. 225–50Google Scholar

Zimmermann, H.-J. 2001. Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications, 4th edn. Dordrecht: Kluwer InternationalCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zinnes, D. 1980. “Prerequisites for the Study of System Transformation,” in Holsti, O., Siverson, R., and George, A. L. (eds.), Change in the International System. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 3–21Google Scholar