Ackerman, P. L. (2013). Engagement and opportunity to learn. In Hattie, J. & Anderman, E. M. (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 39–41). London/New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Adams, G. L., & Engelmann, S. (1996). Research on direct instruction: 20 years beyond DISTAR. Seattle, WA: Educational Achievement Systems.Google Scholar

Anderson, C. A., Carnagey, N. L., Flanagan, M., Benjamin, A. J., Eubanks, J., & Valentine, J. C. (2004). Violent video games: Specific effects of violent content on aggressive thoughts and behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 199–249.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar

Anonymous. (2013). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. By John Hattie (Routledge, 2012). The Main Idea Net: Current book summaries, pp. 1–12. Retrieved from www.TheMainIdea.net

Arnold, I. (2011). John Hattie: Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. International Review of Education, 57, 219–221.Google Scholar

Atkinson, E. (2000). In defence of ideas, or why ‘what works’ is not enough. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(3), 317–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar

Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 586–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baron, J., Boruch, R., Crane, J., Ellwood, D., Gueron, J., Haskins, , … Zoll, N. (2003). Identifying and implementing educational practices supported by rigorous evidence: A user friendly guide. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from www.asu.edu/educ/epsl/EPRU/articles/EPRU-0312–46-OWI.pdf

Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in education: Principles. Policy and Practice, 18(1), 5–25.Google Scholar

Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Berliner, D. C. (2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berliner, D. C., Glass, G. V., & Associates (2014). 50 myths & lies that threaten America's public schools: The real crisis in education. New York, NY/London: Teacher College, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Biesta, G. J. J. (2007). Why ‘what works’ won't work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). Why ‘what works’ still won't work: From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29, 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (structure of the observed outcome). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Black, P. & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 5/1, 7–74.Google Scholar

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Bloom, B. S., Hastings, T., & Madaus, G. (1971). Handbook of formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Borich, G. D. (1995). Effective teaching methods: Research-based practice (.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar

Borman, G. D., Hewes, G.M., Overman, L. T., & Brown, S (2003). Comprehensive school reform and achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 73, 125–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (National Research Council). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar

Brophy, J. E. (2000). Teaching (Educational Practice Series, Vol. 1). Brussels: International Academy of Education and International Bureau of Education. Retrieved from www.ibe.unesco.org

Brophy, J. E. (2006). History of research on classroom management. In Evertson, C. & Weinstein, C. S (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 17–43). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, G. (2013). Gordon Campbell on New Zealand's PISA education rankings. Retrieved from www.scoop.co.nz; last accessed August 2015

Cardelle-Elawar, M. C., & Corno, L. (1985). A factorial experiment in teachers’ written feedback on student homework: Changing teacher behavior a little rather than a lot. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 162–173.Google Scholar

Carlo, M.S., August, D., McLaughlin, B., Snow, C., Dressler, C., Lippman, D., … White, C (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 188–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cash, A. H., & Hamre, B. K. (2013). Evaluating and improving student–teacher interactions. In Hattie, J. & Anderman, E. M. (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 119–121). London/New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Clark, R., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2006). Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar

Cochrane, A. L. (1972, 1999). Effectiveness and efficiency: Random reflections on health services. London: The Royal Society of Medicine Press.Google Scholar

Coe, R. (2002). It's the effect size, stupid: What effect size is and why it is important. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Exeter, England, 1–18.

Coe, R., Aloisi, C., Higgins, S., & Elliot Major, L. (2014). What makes great teaching? Review of the underpinning research. Durham University, U.K.: The Sutton Trust.Google Scholar

Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004a). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. (LSRC reference) Retrieved from www.lsda.org.uk/research/reports

Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004b). Should we be using learning styles? What research has to say to practice. (LSRC reference) Retrieved from www.lsda.org.uk/research/reports

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher–student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, P. (1999). What is evidence-based education?British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 108–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, M. R. (1999). A meta-analytical review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Florio-Hansen, I. (Ed.) (2011). Towards multilingualism and the inclusion of cultural diversity. Kassel, Germany: Kassel University Press.Google Scholar

De Florio-Hansen, I. (2014a). Lernwirksamer Unterricht: Eine praxisorientierte Anleitung. Darmstadt, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft (WBG).Google Scholar

De Florio-Hansen, I. (2014b). Fremdsprachenunterricht lernwirksam gestalten: Mit Beispielen für Englisch, Französisch und Spanisch. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

De Florio-Hansen, I. (2015). Standards, Kompetenzen und fremdsprachliche Bildung: Beispiele für den Englisch- und Französischunterricht. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deutsch, M. (1962). Cooperation and trust: Some theoretical notes. In Jones, M. R. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 275–319). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1900). The school and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1916). The school and society (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1938) Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar

Diao, Y., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2007). The effect of written text on comprehension of spoken English as foreign language. The American Journal of Psychology, 120(2), 237–261.Google Scholar

Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar

Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindset: How you can fulfill your potential. London: Constable and Robinson.Google Scholar

Evertson, C. M., Emmer, E. T., Clements, B. S., & Worsham, M. E.(2004). Classroom management for elementary teachers. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

Fraser, B. J., Walberg, H. J., Welch, W. W., & Hattie, J. (1987). Syntheses of educational productivity research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 145–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freiberg, H. J. (2013). Classroom management and student achievement. In Hattie, J. & Anderman, E. M. (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 228–230). London/New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Wehby, J., Schumacher, R. F., et al. (2015). Inclusion versus specialized intervention for very-low-performing students: What does access mean in an era of academic challenge?Exceptional Children, 81(2), 134–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gan, M. (2011). The effects of prompts and explicit coaching on peer feedback quality (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/handle/2292/6633

Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., Van den Bossche, p., & Segers, M.(2005). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of assessment. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 27–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goetz, T., & Hall, N. C. (2013). Emotion and achievement in classrooms. In Hattie, J. & Anderman, E. M. (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 192–195). London/New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

van Gog, T. (2013). Time on task. In Hattie, J. & Anderman, E. M. (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 432–434). London/New York, NY: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Gorard, S. (2013). Research design: Creating robust approaches for the social sciences. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haas, M. (2005). Teaching methods for secondary algebra: A meta-analysis of findings. NASSP Bulletin, 89(642), 24–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartley, J. (2012). Review: Visible learning for teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), E134–E136.Google Scholar

Hattie, J. (1992). Self-concept. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London/New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. London/New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hattie, J., & Anderman, E. M. (Eds.). (2013). International guide on student achievement. London/New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hattie, J., & Yates, G. (2014). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. London/New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Heath, C., & Heath, D. (2007). Made to stick: Why some ideas survive and others die. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar

Heath, C., & Heath, D. (2010). Teaching that sticks (www.heathbrothers.com/download/mts-teaching-that-sticks.pdf), 1–12.

Herzog, W. (2013). Bildungsstandards: Eine kritische Einführung. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar

Higgins, S., & Simpson, A. (2011). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. By John A. C. Hattie. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(2), 197–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, Madeline Cheek (1976). Improve Instruction. El Segundo, CA: TIP Publications.Google Scholar

Iversen, S. A., & Tunmer, W. E. (1993). Phonological processing skills and the reading recovery program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 112–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction.Google Scholar

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (2005). New developments in social interdependence theory. Psychology Monographs, 131(4), 285–358.Google ScholarPubMed

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (2013). Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning environments. In Hattie, J. & Anderman, E. M. (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 372–374). London/New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., & Holubec, E. (1994). Cooperation in the classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction.Google Scholar

Johnson, D. W, Johnson, R., & Holubec, E. (2008). Cooperation in the classroom (7th ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction.Google Scholar

Johnson, D. W., Maryama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(1), 47–62.Google Scholar

Kang, S. H. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. III. (2007). Test format and corrective feedback modify the effect of testing on long-term retention. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 529–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, J. S. (2006). The influence of class size research on state and local education policy. Brooking Papers on Education Policy.Google Scholar

Kingston, N., & Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(4), 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klahr, D., & Nigham, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: Effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science, 15(10), 661–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kounin, J. S. (1970). Discipline and group management in classrooms. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar

Kuncel, N. R., Crede, M., & Thomas, L. L. (2005). The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 162–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kyun, S., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2013) The effect of worked examples when learning to write essays in English literature. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81(3), 385–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lemov, D. (2010). Teach like a champion: 49 techniques that put your students on the path to college. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Liem, G. A. D., & Martin, A. J. (2013). Direct instruction. In Hattie, J. & Anderman, E. M. (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 366–368). London/New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Markham, T. (2011). Project based learning. Teacher Librarian, 93(2), 38–42.Google Scholar

Marzano, R. J. (1998). A theory-based meta-analysis of research on instruction. Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Regional Educational Lab.Google Scholar

Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning (MRL).Google Scholar

Marzano, R. J., Yanoski, D. C., Hoegh, J. K., & Simms, J. A. (2013). Using common core standards to enhance classroom instruction and assessment. Bloomington, IN: Marzano Research Laboratory (MRL).Google Scholar

Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

McComas, W. F. (1998). The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. Adapted from the chapter in McComas, W. F. (Ed.), The nature of science in science education (pp. 53–70). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Mosteller, F. (1995). The Tennessee study of class size in the early school grades. The Future of Children, 5(2), 113–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mosteller, F., Light, R. J., & Sachs, J. A. (1996). Sustained inquiry in education: Lessons from skill grouping and class size. Harvard Educational Review, 66(4), 797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nuthall, G. A. (2007). The hidden lives of learners. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar

Oakley, A. (2002). Social science and evidence-based everything: The case of education. Educational Review, 54(3), 277–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olson, D. R. (2004). The triumph of hope over experience in the search for ‘what works’: A response to Slavin. Educational Researcher, 33(1), 24–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paivio, A. (1969). Mental imagery in associative learning and memory. Psychological Review, 76(3), 241–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar

Palincsar, A. S. (2003). Collaborative approaches to comprehension instruction. In Sweet, A. S. & Snow, C. E. (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 99–114). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Palincsar, A. S. (2013). Reciprocal teaching. In Hattie, J. & Anderman, E. M. (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 369–371). London/New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.Google Scholar

Palmer, J. A. (Ed.) (2001). Fifty modern thinkers on education: From Piaget to the present day. London/New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palmer, P. J. (1997, 2007). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher's life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Petty, G. (2009). Evidence-based teaching: A practical approach (2nd ed.). Cheltenham, U.K.: Nelson Thornes.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York, NY: International Universities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. New York, NY: Orion Press.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1971). Genetic epistemology. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Raji Codell, E. (1999). Educating Esmé: Diary of a teacher's first year. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.Google Scholar

Raji Codell, E. (2009,). Educating Esmé: Diary of a teacher's first year (). Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.Google Scholar

Ravitch, D. (1995). National standards in American education: A citizen's guide. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Ravitz, J. (2009). Introduction: Summarizing findings and looking ahead to a new generation of PBL research. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1), 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Renkl, A. (2005). The worked-out examples principle in multimedia learning. In Mayer, R. E. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 229–245). Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ripley, A. (2010). What Makes a Great teacher? The Atlantic, issue January/February 2010

Rockwood, H. S. III (1995a). Cooperative and collaborative learning. The National Teaching and Learning Forum, 4(6), 8–9.Google Scholar

Rockwood, H. S. III (1995b). Cooperative and collaborative learning. The National Teaching and Learning Forum, 5(1), 8–10.Google Scholar

Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. (2010). Recent research on human learning challenges. Conventional instructional strategies. Educational Researcher, 39(5), 406–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenshine, B. (1985). Direct instruction. In Husen, T. & Postlethwaite, T. N. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (Vol. 3, pp. 1395–1400). London/New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 64(4), 479–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenshine, B. V. (1979). Content, time and direct instruction. In Peterson, P. L. & Walberg, H. L. (Eds.), Research on teaching (pp. 28–56). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.Google Scholar

Roth, G. (2011). Bildung braucht Persönlichkeit: Wie Lernen gelingt. Stuttgart, Germany: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar

Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. J. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. Oxford, U.K.: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Schoen, D. (1984). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Scott, C. (2013). The search for the key for individualized instruction. In Hattie, J. & Anderman, E. M. (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 385–388). London/New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77, 454–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shavelson, R. J., & Towne, L. (2002). Scientific research in education (National Research Council). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar

Slavin, R. F. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

Snook, I., O'Neill, J., Clark, J., O'Neill, A.-M., & Openshaw, R. (2009). Invisible learnings? A commentary on John Hattie's book: Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 44(1), 93–106.Google Scholar

Sousa, D. A. (2011). How the brain learns (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar

Strobel, J., & van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1), 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load during Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science 12/2, 257–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sweller, J. (2006). How the human cognitive system deals with complexity. In Elen, J. & Clark, R. E. (Eds.), Handling complexity in learning environments: Theory and research (pp. 13–25). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In Mestre, J. & Ross, B. H. (Eds.), Cognition in education (Vol. 55, pp. 37–76). Oxford, U.K.: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, K., & Rohrer, D. (2010). The effects of interleaved practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(6), 837–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thurstone, L. L. (1925). The fundamentals of statistics. London: MacMillan Norwood Press.Google Scholar

Timperley, H. (2013). Feedback. In Hattie, J. & Anderman, E. M. (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 402–404). London/New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Torgerson, C. J., Porthouse, J., & Brooks, G. (2005). A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials evaluating interventions in adult literacy and numeracy. Journal of Research in Reading, 28(2), 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Troia, G. A., & Olinghouse, N. G. (2013). The common core state standards and evidence-based educational practices: The case of writing. School Psychology Review, 42(3), 343–357.Google Scholar

de Vaus, D. (2001). Research design in social research. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1934, 1999). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63, 249–294.Google Scholar

Wellenreuther, M. (2004). Lehren und Lernen – aber wie? Empirisch- experimentelle Forschung zum Lehren und Lernen im Unterricht. Hohengehren, Germany: Schneider.Google Scholar

Wellenreuther, M. (2014). Lehren und Lernen – aber wie? Empirisch- experimentelle Forschung zum Lehren und Lernen im Unterricht (.). Hohengehren, Germany: Schneider.Google Scholar

White, W. A. T. (1988). A meta-analysis of the effects of direct instruction in special education. Education and Treatment of Children, 11(4), 364–374.Google Scholar

Wijnia, L., Loyens, S. M. M., & Derous, E. (2011). Investigating effects of problem-based versus lecture-based learning environments on student motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(2), 101–113.Google Scholar

Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Applied Disciplines, 17, 89–100.Google ScholarPubMed