Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T18:19:13.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Function and evolution of antlers and eye stalks in flies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2010

Jae C. Choe
Affiliation:
Seoul National University
Bernard J. Crespi
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University, British Columbia
Get access

Summary

ABSTRACT

Flies with structures protruding from the head, termed eye stalks or antlers, have long fascinated biologists. In this chapter we consider the possibility that such flies either share developmental predispositions to head modification or face similar selective pressures to augment head width. By randomizing the occurrence of eye stalks and antlers among families of acalyptrate flies over a phylogeny, we demonstrate that eye stalks and antlers have evolved especially often within one superfamily and that eye stalks and antlers exhibit correlated evolution. Because extreme sexual dimorphism of antlers and eye stalks occurs in four families, while correlated evolution of eye stalks in females occurs in others, we suggest that the degree of sexual dimorphism, but not the occurrence of head projections, has been influenced by historical genetic factors. Comparison of the ecology and mating systems of flies from the genus Phytalmia, all species of which possess antlers, with flies from the family Diopsidae, all species of which possess eye stalks, indicates selective similarities. All headprojection flies studied to date exhibit some form of resource–defense mating system. Phytalmia spp. defend rare oviposition sites, whereas dimorphic diopsids defend protected sites where females aggregate at night. In both groups, males assess the body size of competitors from the head projection, and males of similar size engage in extended physical contests for control of a resource. Females of at least two diopsid species also use eye–stalk length to select mates and can influence sperm precedence by ejecting male spermatophores.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×