Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T02:48:55.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Susan Edwards
Susan Edwards
Affiliation:
University of Reading
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Fluent Aphasia , pp. 214 - 223
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albert, M. L., Goodglass, H., Helm, N. A., Rubens, A. B. and Alexander, M. P. 1981. Clinical aspects of dysphasia.Vienna: Springer-VerlagCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, M., Naeser, M. and Palumbo, C. 1987. Correlations of subcortical CT lesion sites and aphasia profiles. Brain 110, 961–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arabatzi, M. and Edwards, S. 2002. Tense and syntactic processes in agrammatic speech. Brain and Language 80, 314–27CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avrutin, S. 2000. Wh-questions in children and Broca's aphasics. In Grodzinsky, Y., Shapiro, L. P. and Swinney, D. A. (eds.), Language and brain: representation and processing.San Diego: Academic Press, 295–312Google Scholar
Balogh, J. and Grodzinsky, Y. 2000. Levels of linguistic representation in Broca's aphasia: implicitness and referentiality of arguments. In Bastiaanse, R. and Grodzinsky, Y. (eds.), Grammatical disorders in aphasia: A neurolinguistic perspective.London: WhurrGoogle Scholar
Basso, A. 2003. Aphasia and its therapy.Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Basso, A., Lecours, A.-R., Moraschini, S. and Vanier, M. 1985. Anatomico-clinical correlations of the aphasias as defined through computerized tomography: on exceptions. Brain and Language 26, 201–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastiaanse, R. and Edwards, S. 2000. Word order and finiteness in Dutch and English Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia. Brain and Language 79, 72–4Google Scholar
Bastiaanse, R. and Edwards, S. 2004. Word order and finiteness in Dutch and English Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia. Brain and Language 89, 91–107CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bastiaanse, R., Edwards, S. and Kiss, K. 1996. Fluent aphasia in three language: aspects of spontaneous speech. Aphasiology 10, 561–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastiaanse, R., Edwards, S., Maas, E. and Rispens, J. 2003. Assessing comprehension and production of verbs and sentences: the Verb and Sentence Test (VAST). Aphasiology 17, 49–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastiaanse, R., Edwards, S. and Rispens, J. 2002. The verb and sentence test.Bury St Edmonds: Thames Valley Test CompanyGoogle Scholar
Bastiaanse, R., Maas, E. and Rispens, J. 2000. De Wwerkwoorden-en ZinnenTest (WEZT).Lisse: Swets and ZeitlingerGoogle Scholar
Bastiaanse, R. and Zonnenfeld, R. 1998. On the relation between verb position in Dutch agrammatic aphasics. Brain and Language 64, 165–81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benson, D. 1967. Fluency in aphasia: correlation with radio-active scan localization. Cortex 3, 373–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, F. and Ardila, A. 1996. Aphasia: a clinical perspective.New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Benton, A. and Joynt, R. 1960. Early descriptions of aphasia. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry 3, 205–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beretta, A. 2001. Linear and structured accounts of theta-role assignment in agrammatic aphasia. Aphasiology 15, 515–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beretta, A., Campbell, C., Carr, T., Huang, J., Schmitt, L., Christianson, K. and Cao, Y. 2003. An ER-fMRI investigation of morphological inflection in German reveals that the brain makes a distinction between regular and irregular forms. Brain and Language 85, 67–92CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berndt, R., Haendiges, A., Mitchum, C. and Sandson, J. 1997. Verb retrieval in aphasia: characterising single word impairment. Brain and Language 56, 68–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berndt, R., Mitchum, C. and Haendiges, A. 1996. Comprehension of reversible sentences in ‘agrammatism’: a meta-analysis. Cognition 58, 289–308CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bird, H. and Franklin, S. 1996. Cinderella revisited: a comparison of fluent and non-fluent aphasic speech. Journal of Neurolinguistics 9, 187–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D. 1982. Test for the reception of grammar. Published by the author, University of ManchesterGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D.Bishop, D. 2003. The test for the reception of grammar TROG version 2. London: Psychological Co.Google Scholar
Blanken, G., Dittmann, J., Grimm, H., , Marshall J. and Wallesch, C. (eds.) 1993. Linguistic disorders and pathologies.Berlin: de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumstein, S., Byma, G., Kurowski, K., Hourihan, J., Brown, T. and Hutchinson, A. 1998. On-line processing of filler gap constructions in aphasia. Brain and Language 61, 149–68CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blumstein, S., Katz, B., Goodglass, H., Shrier, R. and Dworsky, B. 1985. The effects of slowed speech on auditory comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language 24, 266–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bock, K. and Levelt, W. 1994. Language production: grammatical encoding. In Gersbacher, M. A. (ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics.San Diego, CA: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Breedin, S. and Martin, R. 1996. Patterns of verb impairment in aphasia: an analysis of four cases. Cognitive Neuropsychology 13, 51–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brookshire, R. and Nicholas, L. 1994. Speech samples size and test-rest stability of connected speech measures of adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 37, 399–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckingham, , H. 1986. The scan-copier mechanism and the positional level of language production: evidence from phonemic paraphasia. Cognitive Science 10, 195–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, B. and Howard, D. 1987. ParagrammatismCognition 26, 1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, B., Panzeri, M., Semenza, C. and Ferreri, T. 1990. Paragrammatism: a longitudinal study of an Italian patient. Language and Cognitive Processes 5, 115–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byng, S., Kay, J., Edmonson, A. and Scott, C. 1990. Aphasia tests reconsidered. Aphasiology 4, 67–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, D. 2000. Positron emission tomographic studies of syntactic processing. In Grodzinsky, Y., Shapiro, L. and Swinney, D. (eds.), Language and the Brain.San Diego: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Caplan, D. 2004. The neuro in cognitive neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology 21, 17–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caplan, D., Waters, G. and Hildebrandt, N. 1997. Determinants of sentence comprehension in aphasic patients in a sentence-picture matching task. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 40, 543–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A. and Miceli, G. 1991. Selective impairment of theta role assignment in sentence processing. Brain and Language 41, 402–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A. and Zurif, E. 1976. Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language 3, 572–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, N. 1988. Language and the problems of knowledge.Cambridge, MA: MIT, PressGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (eds.), The view from the building 20.Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2000. New horizons in the study of mind and language.Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clashen, H. 1999. Lexical entries and rules of language: a multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 991–1006Google Scholar
Cook, V. and Newson, M. 1996. Chomsky's Universal Grammar.Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Crain, S., Ni, W. and Shankweiler, D. 2001. Grammatism. Brain and Language 77, 294–304CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crary, M., Wertz, R. and Deal, J. 1992. Classifying aphasia: cluster analysis of the Western Aphasia Battery and the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination results. Aphasiology 6, 29–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D., Fletcher, P. and Garman, M. 1976. The grammatical analysis of language disorders. 2nd edn. London: Cole and WhurrGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D., Fletcher, P. and Garman, M. 1989. The grammatical analysis of language disability. 2nd edn. London: Cole and WhurrGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A. 1981. The nature of aphasia: signs and syndromes. In Sarno, M. T. (ed.), Acquired aphasia.New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A. and Tranel, D. 1993. Nouns and verbs are retrieved with differently distributed neural systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 90, 4957–60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidoff, J. and Masterson, J. 1996. The development of picture naming: differences between verbs and nouns. Journal of Neurolinguistics 9, 69–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, G. A. 2000. Aphasiology: disorders and clinical practice.Boston: Allyn and BaconGoogle Scholar
Bleser, R. 1987. From agrammatism to paragrammatism: German aphasiological traditions and grammatical disturbances. Cognitive Neuropsychology 4, 187–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bleser, R. 1988. Localisation of aphasia: science or fiction? In Denes, G., Semenza, C. and Bisiacchi, P. (eds.), Perspectives on cognitive neuropsychology.Hove: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Demonet, J., Fiez, J., Paulesu, E., Petersen, S. and Zatorre, R. 1996. PET studies of phonological processing: a critical reply to Poeppel. Brain and Language 55, 352–79CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Druks, J. and Masterson, J. 2000. Object and Action Naming Battery.Hove: Psychology PressGoogle Scholar
Druks, J. and Marshall, John. 1995. When passives are easier than actives: two case studies of aphasic comprehension. Cognition 55, 311–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, L., Dunn, L., Wetton, C. and Burley, J. 1997. The British Picture Vocabulary Scales.Windsor: NFER-NelsonGoogle Scholar
Edwards, S. 1995. Profiling fluent aphasic spontaneous speech: a comparison of two methodologies. European Journal of Disorders of Communication 30, 333–45CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, S. 2000. Grammar and fluent aphasia. Brain and Language 74, 560–63Google Scholar
Edwards, S. 2003. Aphasia therapy. Paper given at fourth Science of Aphasia Conference, Trieste, Italy
Edwards, S. and Bastiaanse, R. 1998. Diversity in the lexical and syntactic abilities of fluent aphasic speakers. Aphasiology 12, 99–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, S. and Garman, M. 1989. Case study of a fluent aphasic: the relationship between linguistic assessment and therapeutic intervention. In Grunwell, P. and James, A. (eds.). The functional evaluation of language disorders.London: Croom HelmGoogle Scholar
Edwards, S., Garman, M. and Knott, R. 1995. Grammatical analysis of aphasic speech: the potential of unmarked sources of evidence. Brain and Language 51, 103–6Google Scholar
Edwards, S. and Knott, R. 1994. Assessing spontaneous language abilities of aphasic speakers. Testing 11, 49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, S. and Salis, C. (in press). Adaptation theory and non-fluent aphasia in English speakers. AphasiologyGoogle Scholar
Edwards, S., Tucker, K. and McCann, C. 2004. The contribution of verb retrieval to sentence construction: a clinical study. Brain and Language 91, 78–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggert, G. (ed.). 1977. Wernicke's works on aphasia.The Hague: MoutonGoogle Scholar
Ellis, A. and Young, A. 1988. Human cognitive neuropsychology.London: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Francis, W. and Kucera, H. 1982. Frequency analysis of English language usage: lexicon and grammar.Boston, MA: Houghton MiflinGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N. 2000. Moving verbs in agrammatic production. In Bastiaanse, R. and Grodzinsky, Y. (eds.), Grammatical disorders in aphasia.London: WhurrGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N. and Grodzinsky, Y. 1997. Verb inflection in agrammatism: pruning the syntactic tree. Brain and Language 56, 397–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garman M. 1989. The role of linguistics in speech therapy: assessment and interpretation. In Grunwell, P. and James, A. (eds.), The functional evaluation of language disorders.London: Croom HelmGoogle Scholar
Garman, M. and Edwards, S. 1995. Syntactic assessment of expressive language. In Grundy, K. (ed.), Linguistics in clinical practice. 2nd edn. London: Taylor and FrancisGoogle Scholar
Garrett, M. F. 1975. The analysis of sentence production. In Bower, G. (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation.New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Garrett, M. F. 1976. Syntactic processes in sentence production. In Wales, R. J. and Walker, E. (eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms.Amstordam: HollandGoogle Scholar
Garrett, M. F. 1988. Processes in language production. In Newmyer, F. J. (ed.), Linguistics: the Cambridge survey. Vol. Ⅲ: Language: psychological and biological aspects.Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Gerschwind, N. 1966. Carl Wernicke, the Breslau School and the history of aphasia. In Carterette, E. C. (ed.), Brain function Ⅲ speech, language and communication.Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Gleason, J. B., Goodglass, H., Obler, L., Green, E., Hyde, M. and Weintraub, S. 1980. Narrative strategies of aphasic and normal-speaking subjects. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 23, 370–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldman, R., Schwartz, M. and Wiltshire, C. 2001. The influence of phonological context on the sound errors a speaker makes. Brain and Language 78, 279–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodglass, H. 1993. Understanding aphasia.San Diego: Academic Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Goodglass, H., Christiansen, J. and Gallagher, R. 1993. Comparison of morphology and syntax in free narrative and structured tests: fluent vs. non-fluent aphasics. Cortex 29, 131–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodglass, H. and Hunt, J. 1958. Grammatical complexity and aphasic speech. Word 14, 197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodglass, H. and Kaplan, E. 1972. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders.Philadelphia: Lea and FebigerGoogle Scholar
Goodglass, H. and Kaplan, E. 1983. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Lea and FebigerGoogle Scholar
Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E. and Barresi, B. 2001. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. 3rd edn. London: Lippincott Williams and WilkinsGoogle Scholar
Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E. and Weintraub, S. 1983. The Boston Naming Test.Philadelphia: Lea and FebigerGoogle Scholar
Goodglass, H., Quadfasel, F. A. and Timberlake, W. H. 1964. Phrase length and the type and severity of aphasia. Cortex 1, 133–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y. 1990. Theoretical perspectives on language deficits.Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y. 1991. There is an entity called agrammatism. Brain and Language 41, 555–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y. 1995. A restrictive theory of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language 50, 27–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grodzinsky, Y. 1995. Trace deletion, theta roles and cognitive strategies. Brain and Language 51, 469–97CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grodzinsky, Y. 2000a. The neurology of syntax: language without Broca's area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23, 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y. 2000b. Overarching agrammatism. In Grodzinsky, Y., Shapiro, L. and Swinney, D. (eds.), Language and the Brain: representation and processing.San Diego: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, L. 1994. Government and Binding Theory. 2nd edn. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Hagiwara, H. 1993. The breakdown of Japanese passives and theta-role assignment principle by Broca's aphasics. Brain and Language 45, 318–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagiwara, H. 1995. The breakdown of functional categories and the economy of derivation. Brain and Language 50, 92–117CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagoort, P., Brown, C. and Osterhout, L. 1999. The neurocognition of syntactic processing. In Brown, C. and Hagoort, P. (eds.), The neurocognition of language.Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hagoort, P. and Kutas, M. 1995. Electrophysiological insights into language deficits. In F. Boller and J. Grafman (eds.), Handbook of Neuropsychology, Vol. Ⅹ
Hagoort, P., Wassenaar, M. and Brown, C. 2003. Syntax-related ERP-effects in Dutch. Cognitive Brain Research 16, 38–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harley, T. 1995. The psychology of language.Hove: Psychology PressGoogle Scholar
Harley, T. 2004. Does cognitive psychology have a future?Cognitive Neuropsychology 21, 3–16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Head, Henry. 1920. Aphasia: an historical review. Proceedings of the Society of Neurology of the Royal Society of Medicine, 390–411Google Scholar
Hesketh, A. and Bishop, D. 1996. Agrammatism and adaptation theory. Aphasiology 10, 49–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickok, G. 1992. Agrammatic comprehension and trace deletion hypothesis. Occasional Paper No. 45, MIT Centre for Cognitive Science
Hickok, G. 1993. Parallel parsing: evidence from re-activation in garden-path sentences. Journal of psycholinguistic Research 22, 239–50Google Scholar
Hickok, G. and Avrutin, S. 1996. Representation, referentiality and processing in agrammatic comprehension: two case studies. Brain and Language 50, 10–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickok, G. and Avrutin, S. 1996. Wh-questions in two Broca's aphasiacs. Brain and Language 52, 314–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis, A. 2002. New techniques for identifying the neural substrate of language and language impairments. Aphasiology 16, 855–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis, A. and Heidler, J. 2002. Mechanism of early aphasia recovery. Aphasiology 16, 885–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, D. 1997. Language in the human brain. In Rugg, M. (ed.), Cognitive neuropsychology.Hove: Psychology PressGoogle Scholar
Howes, D. 1964. Application of the word-frequency concept to aphasia. In Reuck, A. V. and O'Connor, M. (eds.), Disorders of language.London: ChurchillGoogle Scholar
Howes, D. and Gerschwind, N. 1964. Quantitative studies of aphasic language. Ass. Res. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 42, 229–44Google ScholarPubMed
Huber, W., Poeck, K., Weniger, D. and Willmes, K. 1983. The Aachen Aphasia Test.Goettingen: HogrefeGoogle Scholar
Huber, W., Poeck, K. and Willmes, K. 1984. The Aachen Aphasia Test (AAT). Advances in Neurology 42, 291–303Google Scholar
Inglis, A. L. 2003. Taking expectations to task in aphasic sentence comprehension: investigations of off-line performance. Aphasiology 17, 265–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, B. 2004. Model based intervention for sentence production disorders in patients with aphasia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Canterbury, New Zealand
Jaeger, J. J., Lockwood, A. H., Kemmerer, D. L., Valin, R. D., Murphy, B. W. and Khalak, H. G. 1996. A positron emission tomographic study of regular and irregular verb morphology in English. Language 72, 451–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, M. and Carpenter, P. 1992. A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review 99, 122–49CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kay, J., Lesser, R. and Coltheart, A. 1992. The psycholinguistic analysis of language processing.Hove: Psychology PressGoogle Scholar
Kertesz, A. 1982. The Western Aphasia Battery.New York: Grune and StattonGoogle Scholar
Kolk, H. and Heeschen, C. 1992. Agrammatism, paragrammatism and the management of language. Language and Cognitive Processes 7, 89–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesser, R. 1978. Linguistics aspects of aphasia.London: ArnoldGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. 1989. Speaking: from intention to articulation.Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W., Roelofs, A. and Meyer, A. 1999. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 1–75CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lichtheim, L. 1885. On aphasia. Brain 7, 433–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luzzatti, C., Raggi, R., Zonca, G., Pistarni, C., Contardi, A. and Pinna, G. 2002. On the nature of selective impairment of verb and noun retrieval. Cortex 37, 724–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luzzatti, C., Toraldo, A., Guasti, M., Ghirardi, G., Lorenzi, L. and Guarnaschelli, C. 2001. Comprehension of reversible active and passive sentences in agrammatism. Aphasiology 15, 419–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, John. 1995. Acquired disorders of language: from Gesner to Goodglass (and back again). Review: Understanding Aphasia by Goodglass, H.. Language and Speech 38, 307–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Jane, Black, M., Byng, S., Chiat, S. and Pring, T. (eds.) 1999. The sentence processing resource pack. Oxon: Winslow PressGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Jane, Chiat, S. and Pring, T. 1997. An impairment in processing verbs' thematic roles: a therapy study. Aphasiology 11, 855–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, N. and Gupta, P. 2004. Exploring the relationship between word processing and verbal short-term memory: evidence from associations and dissociations. Cognitive Neuropsychology 21, 213–28CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, R. 1995. Working memory doesn't work: a critique of Miyake et al.'s Capacity Theory of aphasia comprehension deficits. Cognitive Neuropsychology 12, 623–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R. and Blossom-Stach, C. 1986. Evidence of syntactic deficits in a fluent aphasic. Brain and Language 28, 196–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, C. and Edwards, S. 2002. Verb problems in fluent aphasia. Brain and Language 83, 42–4Google Scholar
McCann, C. and Edwards, S. 2003. Fractionating the comprehension deficit in fluent aphasia: adding to the data. Paper given at Verb Seminar: University College London
Miller, N., Willmes, K. and Bleser, R. 2000. The psychometric properties of the English language version of the Aachen Aphasia Test (EAAT). Aphasiology 14, 683–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A., Carpenter, P. and Just, M. 1994. A capacity approach to syntactic comprehension disorders: making normal adults perform like aphasic patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology 11, 671–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, J. 1990. Nonlexical grammatical deviations in ‘paragrammatic’ aphasia. Folia Linguistica 24, 389–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obler, L. and Gjerlow, K. 1999. Language and the brain.Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Ojemann, G. 1994. Cortical stimulation and recording in language. In Kertesz, A. (ed.), Localisation and neuroimaging in neuropsychology.New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Ouhalla, J. 1993. Functional categories, agrammatism and language acquisition. Linguistic Berichte 143, 3–36Google Scholar
Paulesu, E., Frith, E. and Frackowiak, R. 1993. The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory. Nature 362, 342–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penn, C. 2000. Aphasia in Afrikaans: a preliminary analysis. Paper given at Aphasia Rehabilitation Conference, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Pesetsky, D. 1987. Wh-in-situ: movement and unselective binding.Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Poeck, K. 1989. Fluency. In Code, C. (ed.), The characteristics of aphasia.Hove: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Poeppel, D. 1996. A critical review of PET studies of phonological processing. Brain and Language 55, 317–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollock, J. 1989. Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424Google Scholar
Pring, T. 2004. Ask a silly question: two decades of troublesome trials. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 39, 285–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prins, R., Snow, C. and Wagenaar, E. 1978. Recovery from aphasia: spontaneous speech versus language comprehension. Brain and Language 6, 192–211CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pustejovsky, J. 1995. The generative lexicon.Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S. and Leech, G. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language.Harlow: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartrik, J. 1972. A grammar of contemporary English.London: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Radford, A. 1997. Syntax: a Minimalist introduction.Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapcsak, S. and Rubens, A. 1994. Localization of lesions in transcortical aphasia. In Kertesz, A. (ed.), Localization and neuroimaging in neuroimaging in neuropsychology.London: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Rosen, S. T. 1996. Events and verb classification. Linguistics 34, 191–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffran, E., Berndt, R. and Schwartz, M. 1989. The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: procedures and data. Brain and Language 37, 440–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, M. 1987. Patterns of speech production deficits within and across aphasia syndromes: application of a psycholinguistic model. In Coltheart, M., Sartori, G. and Job, R. (eds.), The cognitive neuropsychology of language.Hove: Lawrence ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, M., Saffran, E., Myers, J. and Martin, R. 1994. Mapping therapy: a treatment program for agrammatism. Aphasiology 8, 19–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalice, T. 2004. On Harley on Rapp. Cognitive Neuropsychology 21, 41–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, L. 2000. Some recent investigations of gap filling in normal listeners: implications for normal and disordered language processing. In Grodzinsky, Y., Shapiro, L. and Swinney, D. (eds.), Language and the Brain.San Diego: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, L., Gordon, B., Hack, N. and Killackey, J. 1993. Verb-argument structure processing in complex sentences in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia. Brain and Language 45, 423–47CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapiro, L. and Levine, B. 1990. Verb processing during sentence comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language 38, 21–47CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, E. and Geva, A. 2000. Verbal working memory and its connections to language processing. In Grodinsky, Y., Shapiro, L. and Swinney, D. (eds.), Language and the Brain.San Diego: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Smith, N. 1999. Chomsky: ideas and ideals.Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swaab, T., Brown, C. and Hagoort, P. 1997. Spoken Sentence comprehension in aphasia: event-related potential evidence for a lexical integration deficit. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9, 1, 39–66CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swinney, D., Zurif, E. and Nicol, J. 1989 The effects of focal brain damage on sentence processing: an examination of the neurological organisation of a mental module. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1, 25–37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swinney, D., Zurif, E., Prather, P. and Love, T. 1996. The neurological distribution of processing operations underlying language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8, 174–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinney, D. and Zurif, E. 1995. Syntactic processing in aphasia. Brain and Language 50, 225–39CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, C. K. (in press). Functional neuro-imaging: applications for studying aphasia. In LaPointe, L. L. (ed.), Aphasia and related neurogenic language disorders. 3rd edn. New York: ThiemeGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C. K. and Faroqi Shah, Y. 2002. Models of sentence production. In Hillis, A. (ed.), The handbook of adult language disorders.New York: Psychology PressGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C. K., Lange, K., Schneider, S. and Shapiro, L. 1997. Agrammatic and non-brain damaged subjects' verb and argument structure production. Aphasiology 11, 473–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C. K., Fix, S., Gitelman, D., Parrish, T. and Mesulam, M. 2000. FMRI studies of agrammatic sentence comprehension before and after treatment. Brain and Language 74, 387–91Google Scholar
Thompson, C. K. and Shapiro, L. P. 1995. Training sentences in agrammatism: implications for normal and disordered language. Brain and Language 50, 201–24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, C. K., Shapiro, L., Kiran, S. and Sobecks, J. 2003. The role of syntactic complexity in treatment of sentence deficits in agrammatic aphasia: the complexity account of treatment efficacy (CATE). Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 46, 591–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C. K., Shapiro, L., Li, L. and Schendel, L. 1994. Analysis of verbs and verb argument structure: a method for quantification of agrammatic language production. Clinical Aphasiology 23, 121–40Google Scholar
Thompson, C. K., Shapiro, L. and Roberts, M. 1993. Treatment of sentence production deficits in aphasia: a linguistic-specific approach to wh-interrogative training and generalization. Aphasiology 7, 111–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, L. K., Bright, P., Fletcher, P. and Stamatakis, E. 2004. Neural processing of nouns and verbs: the role of inflectional morphology. Neuropsychologia 42, 512–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, L. K., Russell, R., Fadili, J. and Moss, H. 2001. The neural representation of nouns and verbs: PET studies. Brain 124, 1619–34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ullman, M., Corkin, S., Coppola, M., Hickok, G. and Koroshetz, W. et al. 1997. A neural dissociation within language: evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 30, 37–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallesch, C., Bak, T. and Schulle-Monting, J. 1992. Acute aphasia – patterns and prognosis. Aphasiology 6, 373–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wepman, J. and Jones, L. 1961. Language modality test for aphasia.Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Wernicke, C. 1874/1977. Der aphasische symptomencomplex: ein psychologische studie auf anatomische basis. In Eggert, G. H. (ed.), Wernicke's works on aphasia: a source book and review.The Hague: MoutonGoogle Scholar
Willmes, K. and Poeck, K. 1993. To what extent can aphasic syndromes be localised?Brain 116, 1527–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, R., Chollet, F., Hadar, U., Friston, K., Hoffner, E. and Frackowiak, R. 1991. Distribution of cortical neural networks involved in word comprehension and word retrieval. Cortex 114, 1803–17Google ScholarPubMed
Zingeser, I. and Berndt, R. 1990. Retrieval of nouns and verbs in agrammatism and anomia. Brain and Language 39, 14–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zurif, E. 1995. Brain regions of relevance to syntactic processing. In Gleitman, L. and Liberman, M. (eds.). Language.Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Zurif, E. and Pinange, M. 2000. Semantic composition: processing parameters and neuroanatomical considerations. In Bastiaanse, R. and Godzinsky, Y. (eds.), Grammatical disorders in aphasia: a neurolinguistic perspective.London: WhurrGoogle Scholar
Zurif, E. and Swinney, D. 1994. Neuropsychology of sentence comprehension. In Gernsbacher, M. A. (ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics.Orlando, FL: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Zurif, E., Swinney, D., Prather, P., Solomon, J. and Bushell, C. 1993. An on-line analysis of syntactic processing in Broca's aphasia and Wernicke's aphasia. Brain and Language 45, 448–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albert, M. L., Goodglass, H., Helm, N. A., Rubens, A. B. and Alexander, M. P. 1981. Clinical aspects of dysphasia.Vienna: Springer-VerlagCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, M., Naeser, M. and Palumbo, C. 1987. Correlations of subcortical CT lesion sites and aphasia profiles. Brain 110, 961–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arabatzi, M. and Edwards, S. 2002. Tense and syntactic processes in agrammatic speech. Brain and Language 80, 314–27CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avrutin, S. 2000. Wh-questions in children and Broca's aphasics. In Grodzinsky, Y., Shapiro, L. P. and Swinney, D. A. (eds.), Language and brain: representation and processing.San Diego: Academic Press, 295–312Google Scholar
Balogh, J. and Grodzinsky, Y. 2000. Levels of linguistic representation in Broca's aphasia: implicitness and referentiality of arguments. In Bastiaanse, R. and Grodzinsky, Y. (eds.), Grammatical disorders in aphasia: A neurolinguistic perspective.London: WhurrGoogle Scholar
Basso, A. 2003. Aphasia and its therapy.Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Basso, A., Lecours, A.-R., Moraschini, S. and Vanier, M. 1985. Anatomico-clinical correlations of the aphasias as defined through computerized tomography: on exceptions. Brain and Language 26, 201–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastiaanse, R. and Edwards, S. 2000. Word order and finiteness in Dutch and English Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia. Brain and Language 79, 72–4Google Scholar
Bastiaanse, R. and Edwards, S. 2004. Word order and finiteness in Dutch and English Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia. Brain and Language 89, 91–107CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bastiaanse, R., Edwards, S. and Kiss, K. 1996. Fluent aphasia in three language: aspects of spontaneous speech. Aphasiology 10, 561–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastiaanse, R., Edwards, S., Maas, E. and Rispens, J. 2003. Assessing comprehension and production of verbs and sentences: the Verb and Sentence Test (VAST). Aphasiology 17, 49–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastiaanse, R., Edwards, S. and Rispens, J. 2002. The verb and sentence test.Bury St Edmonds: Thames Valley Test CompanyGoogle Scholar
Bastiaanse, R., Maas, E. and Rispens, J. 2000. De Wwerkwoorden-en ZinnenTest (WEZT).Lisse: Swets and ZeitlingerGoogle Scholar
Bastiaanse, R. and Zonnenfeld, R. 1998. On the relation between verb position in Dutch agrammatic aphasics. Brain and Language 64, 165–81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benson, D. 1967. Fluency in aphasia: correlation with radio-active scan localization. Cortex 3, 373–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, F. and Ardila, A. 1996. Aphasia: a clinical perspective.New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Benton, A. and Joynt, R. 1960. Early descriptions of aphasia. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry 3, 205–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beretta, A. 2001. Linear and structured accounts of theta-role assignment in agrammatic aphasia. Aphasiology 15, 515–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beretta, A., Campbell, C., Carr, T., Huang, J., Schmitt, L., Christianson, K. and Cao, Y. 2003. An ER-fMRI investigation of morphological inflection in German reveals that the brain makes a distinction between regular and irregular forms. Brain and Language 85, 67–92CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berndt, R., Haendiges, A., Mitchum, C. and Sandson, J. 1997. Verb retrieval in aphasia: characterising single word impairment. Brain and Language 56, 68–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berndt, R., Mitchum, C. and Haendiges, A. 1996. Comprehension of reversible sentences in ‘agrammatism’: a meta-analysis. Cognition 58, 289–308CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bird, H. and Franklin, S. 1996. Cinderella revisited: a comparison of fluent and non-fluent aphasic speech. Journal of Neurolinguistics 9, 187–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D. 1982. Test for the reception of grammar. Published by the author, University of ManchesterGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D.Bishop, D. 2003. The test for the reception of grammar TROG version 2. London: Psychological Co.Google Scholar
Blanken, G., Dittmann, J., Grimm, H., , Marshall J. and Wallesch, C. (eds.) 1993. Linguistic disorders and pathologies.Berlin: de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumstein, S., Byma, G., Kurowski, K., Hourihan, J., Brown, T. and Hutchinson, A. 1998. On-line processing of filler gap constructions in aphasia. Brain and Language 61, 149–68CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blumstein, S., Katz, B., Goodglass, H., Shrier, R. and Dworsky, B. 1985. The effects of slowed speech on auditory comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language 24, 266–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bock, K. and Levelt, W. 1994. Language production: grammatical encoding. In Gersbacher, M. A. (ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics.San Diego, CA: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Breedin, S. and Martin, R. 1996. Patterns of verb impairment in aphasia: an analysis of four cases. Cognitive Neuropsychology 13, 51–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brookshire, R. and Nicholas, L. 1994. Speech samples size and test-rest stability of connected speech measures of adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 37, 399–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckingham, , H. 1986. The scan-copier mechanism and the positional level of language production: evidence from phonemic paraphasia. Cognitive Science 10, 195–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, B. and Howard, D. 1987. ParagrammatismCognition 26, 1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, B., Panzeri, M., Semenza, C. and Ferreri, T. 1990. Paragrammatism: a longitudinal study of an Italian patient. Language and Cognitive Processes 5, 115–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byng, S., Kay, J., Edmonson, A. and Scott, C. 1990. Aphasia tests reconsidered. Aphasiology 4, 67–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, D. 2000. Positron emission tomographic studies of syntactic processing. In Grodzinsky, Y., Shapiro, L. and Swinney, D. (eds.), Language and the Brain.San Diego: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Caplan, D. 2004. The neuro in cognitive neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology 21, 17–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caplan, D., Waters, G. and Hildebrandt, N. 1997. Determinants of sentence comprehension in aphasic patients in a sentence-picture matching task. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 40, 543–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A. and Miceli, G. 1991. Selective impairment of theta role assignment in sentence processing. Brain and Language 41, 402–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A. and Zurif, E. 1976. Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language 3, 572–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, N. 1988. Language and the problems of knowledge.Cambridge, MA: MIT, PressGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (eds.), The view from the building 20.Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2000. New horizons in the study of mind and language.Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clashen, H. 1999. Lexical entries and rules of language: a multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 991–1006Google Scholar
Cook, V. and Newson, M. 1996. Chomsky's Universal Grammar.Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Crain, S., Ni, W. and Shankweiler, D. 2001. Grammatism. Brain and Language 77, 294–304CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crary, M., Wertz, R. and Deal, J. 1992. Classifying aphasia: cluster analysis of the Western Aphasia Battery and the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination results. Aphasiology 6, 29–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D., Fletcher, P. and Garman, M. 1976. The grammatical analysis of language disorders. 2nd edn. London: Cole and WhurrGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D., Fletcher, P. and Garman, M. 1989. The grammatical analysis of language disability. 2nd edn. London: Cole and WhurrGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A. 1981. The nature of aphasia: signs and syndromes. In Sarno, M. T. (ed.), Acquired aphasia.New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A. and Tranel, D. 1993. Nouns and verbs are retrieved with differently distributed neural systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 90, 4957–60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidoff, J. and Masterson, J. 1996. The development of picture naming: differences between verbs and nouns. Journal of Neurolinguistics 9, 69–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, G. A. 2000. Aphasiology: disorders and clinical practice.Boston: Allyn and BaconGoogle Scholar
Bleser, R. 1987. From agrammatism to paragrammatism: German aphasiological traditions and grammatical disturbances. Cognitive Neuropsychology 4, 187–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bleser, R. 1988. Localisation of aphasia: science or fiction? In Denes, G., Semenza, C. and Bisiacchi, P. (eds.), Perspectives on cognitive neuropsychology.Hove: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Demonet, J., Fiez, J., Paulesu, E., Petersen, S. and Zatorre, R. 1996. PET studies of phonological processing: a critical reply to Poeppel. Brain and Language 55, 352–79CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Druks, J. and Masterson, J. 2000. Object and Action Naming Battery.Hove: Psychology PressGoogle Scholar
Druks, J. and Marshall, John. 1995. When passives are easier than actives: two case studies of aphasic comprehension. Cognition 55, 311–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, L., Dunn, L., Wetton, C. and Burley, J. 1997. The British Picture Vocabulary Scales.Windsor: NFER-NelsonGoogle Scholar
Edwards, S. 1995. Profiling fluent aphasic spontaneous speech: a comparison of two methodologies. European Journal of Disorders of Communication 30, 333–45CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, S. 2000. Grammar and fluent aphasia. Brain and Language 74, 560–63Google Scholar
Edwards, S. 2003. Aphasia therapy. Paper given at fourth Science of Aphasia Conference, Trieste, Italy
Edwards, S. and Bastiaanse, R. 1998. Diversity in the lexical and syntactic abilities of fluent aphasic speakers. Aphasiology 12, 99–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, S. and Garman, M. 1989. Case study of a fluent aphasic: the relationship between linguistic assessment and therapeutic intervention. In Grunwell, P. and James, A. (eds.). The functional evaluation of language disorders.London: Croom HelmGoogle Scholar
Edwards, S., Garman, M. and Knott, R. 1995. Grammatical analysis of aphasic speech: the potential of unmarked sources of evidence. Brain and Language 51, 103–6Google Scholar
Edwards, S. and Knott, R. 1994. Assessing spontaneous language abilities of aphasic speakers. Testing 11, 49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, S. and Salis, C. (in press). Adaptation theory and non-fluent aphasia in English speakers. AphasiologyGoogle Scholar
Edwards, S., Tucker, K. and McCann, C. 2004. The contribution of verb retrieval to sentence construction: a clinical study. Brain and Language 91, 78–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggert, G. (ed.). 1977. Wernicke's works on aphasia.The Hague: MoutonGoogle Scholar
Ellis, A. and Young, A. 1988. Human cognitive neuropsychology.London: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Francis, W. and Kucera, H. 1982. Frequency analysis of English language usage: lexicon and grammar.Boston, MA: Houghton MiflinGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N. 2000. Moving verbs in agrammatic production. In Bastiaanse, R. and Grodzinsky, Y. (eds.), Grammatical disorders in aphasia.London: WhurrGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N. and Grodzinsky, Y. 1997. Verb inflection in agrammatism: pruning the syntactic tree. Brain and Language 56, 397–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garman M. 1989. The role of linguistics in speech therapy: assessment and interpretation. In Grunwell, P. and James, A. (eds.), The functional evaluation of language disorders.London: Croom HelmGoogle Scholar
Garman, M. and Edwards, S. 1995. Syntactic assessment of expressive language. In Grundy, K. (ed.), Linguistics in clinical practice. 2nd edn. London: Taylor and FrancisGoogle Scholar
Garrett, M. F. 1975. The analysis of sentence production. In Bower, G. (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation.New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Garrett, M. F. 1976. Syntactic processes in sentence production. In Wales, R. J. and Walker, E. (eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms.Amstordam: HollandGoogle Scholar
Garrett, M. F. 1988. Processes in language production. In Newmyer, F. J. (ed.), Linguistics: the Cambridge survey. Vol. Ⅲ: Language: psychological and biological aspects.Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Gerschwind, N. 1966. Carl Wernicke, the Breslau School and the history of aphasia. In Carterette, E. C. (ed.), Brain function Ⅲ speech, language and communication.Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Gleason, J. B., Goodglass, H., Obler, L., Green, E., Hyde, M. and Weintraub, S. 1980. Narrative strategies of aphasic and normal-speaking subjects. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 23, 370–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldman, R., Schwartz, M. and Wiltshire, C. 2001. The influence of phonological context on the sound errors a speaker makes. Brain and Language 78, 279–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodglass, H. 1993. Understanding aphasia.San Diego: Academic Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Goodglass, H., Christiansen, J. and Gallagher, R. 1993. Comparison of morphology and syntax in free narrative and structured tests: fluent vs. non-fluent aphasics. Cortex 29, 131–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodglass, H. and Hunt, J. 1958. Grammatical complexity and aphasic speech. Word 14, 197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodglass, H. and Kaplan, E. 1972. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders.Philadelphia: Lea and FebigerGoogle Scholar
Goodglass, H. and Kaplan, E. 1983. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Lea and FebigerGoogle Scholar
Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E. and Barresi, B. 2001. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. 3rd edn. London: Lippincott Williams and WilkinsGoogle Scholar
Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E. and Weintraub, S. 1983. The Boston Naming Test.Philadelphia: Lea and FebigerGoogle Scholar
Goodglass, H., Quadfasel, F. A. and Timberlake, W. H. 1964. Phrase length and the type and severity of aphasia. Cortex 1, 133–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y. 1990. Theoretical perspectives on language deficits.Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y. 1991. There is an entity called agrammatism. Brain and Language 41, 555–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y. 1995. A restrictive theory of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language 50, 27–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grodzinsky, Y. 1995. Trace deletion, theta roles and cognitive strategies. Brain and Language 51, 469–97CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grodzinsky, Y. 2000a. The neurology of syntax: language without Broca's area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23, 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y. 2000b. Overarching agrammatism. In Grodzinsky, Y., Shapiro, L. and Swinney, D. (eds.), Language and the Brain: representation and processing.San Diego: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, L. 1994. Government and Binding Theory. 2nd edn. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Hagiwara, H. 1993. The breakdown of Japanese passives and theta-role assignment principle by Broca's aphasics. Brain and Language 45, 318–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagiwara, H. 1995. The breakdown of functional categories and the economy of derivation. Brain and Language 50, 92–117CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagoort, P., Brown, C. and Osterhout, L. 1999. The neurocognition of syntactic processing. In Brown, C. and Hagoort, P. (eds.), The neurocognition of language.Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hagoort, P. and Kutas, M. 1995. Electrophysiological insights into language deficits. In F. Boller and J. Grafman (eds.), Handbook of Neuropsychology, Vol. Ⅹ
Hagoort, P., Wassenaar, M. and Brown, C. 2003. Syntax-related ERP-effects in Dutch. Cognitive Brain Research 16, 38–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harley, T. 1995. The psychology of language.Hove: Psychology PressGoogle Scholar
Harley, T. 2004. Does cognitive psychology have a future?Cognitive Neuropsychology 21, 3–16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Head, Henry. 1920. Aphasia: an historical review. Proceedings of the Society of Neurology of the Royal Society of Medicine, 390–411Google Scholar
Hesketh, A. and Bishop, D. 1996. Agrammatism and adaptation theory. Aphasiology 10, 49–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickok, G. 1992. Agrammatic comprehension and trace deletion hypothesis. Occasional Paper No. 45, MIT Centre for Cognitive Science
Hickok, G. 1993. Parallel parsing: evidence from re-activation in garden-path sentences. Journal of psycholinguistic Research 22, 239–50Google Scholar
Hickok, G. and Avrutin, S. 1996. Representation, referentiality and processing in agrammatic comprehension: two case studies. Brain and Language 50, 10–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickok, G. and Avrutin, S. 1996. Wh-questions in two Broca's aphasiacs. Brain and Language 52, 314–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis, A. 2002. New techniques for identifying the neural substrate of language and language impairments. Aphasiology 16, 855–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis, A. and Heidler, J. 2002. Mechanism of early aphasia recovery. Aphasiology 16, 885–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, D. 1997. Language in the human brain. In Rugg, M. (ed.), Cognitive neuropsychology.Hove: Psychology PressGoogle Scholar
Howes, D. 1964. Application of the word-frequency concept to aphasia. In Reuck, A. V. and O'Connor, M. (eds.), Disorders of language.London: ChurchillGoogle Scholar
Howes, D. and Gerschwind, N. 1964. Quantitative studies of aphasic language. Ass. Res. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 42, 229–44Google ScholarPubMed
Huber, W., Poeck, K., Weniger, D. and Willmes, K. 1983. The Aachen Aphasia Test.Goettingen: HogrefeGoogle Scholar
Huber, W., Poeck, K. and Willmes, K. 1984. The Aachen Aphasia Test (AAT). Advances in Neurology 42, 291–303Google Scholar
Inglis, A. L. 2003. Taking expectations to task in aphasic sentence comprehension: investigations of off-line performance. Aphasiology 17, 265–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, B. 2004. Model based intervention for sentence production disorders in patients with aphasia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Canterbury, New Zealand
Jaeger, J. J., Lockwood, A. H., Kemmerer, D. L., Valin, R. D., Murphy, B. W. and Khalak, H. G. 1996. A positron emission tomographic study of regular and irregular verb morphology in English. Language 72, 451–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, M. and Carpenter, P. 1992. A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review 99, 122–49CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kay, J., Lesser, R. and Coltheart, A. 1992. The psycholinguistic analysis of language processing.Hove: Psychology PressGoogle Scholar
Kertesz, A. 1982. The Western Aphasia Battery.New York: Grune and StattonGoogle Scholar
Kolk, H. and Heeschen, C. 1992. Agrammatism, paragrammatism and the management of language. Language and Cognitive Processes 7, 89–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesser, R. 1978. Linguistics aspects of aphasia.London: ArnoldGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. 1989. Speaking: from intention to articulation.Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W., Roelofs, A. and Meyer, A. 1999. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 1–75CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lichtheim, L. 1885. On aphasia. Brain 7, 433–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luzzatti, C., Raggi, R., Zonca, G., Pistarni, C., Contardi, A. and Pinna, G. 2002. On the nature of selective impairment of verb and noun retrieval. Cortex 37, 724–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luzzatti, C., Toraldo, A., Guasti, M., Ghirardi, G., Lorenzi, L. and Guarnaschelli, C. 2001. Comprehension of reversible active and passive sentences in agrammatism. Aphasiology 15, 419–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, John. 1995. Acquired disorders of language: from Gesner to Goodglass (and back again). Review: Understanding Aphasia by Goodglass, H.. Language and Speech 38, 307–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Jane, Black, M., Byng, S., Chiat, S. and Pring, T. (eds.) 1999. The sentence processing resource pack. Oxon: Winslow PressGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Jane, Chiat, S. and Pring, T. 1997. An impairment in processing verbs' thematic roles: a therapy study. Aphasiology 11, 855–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, N. and Gupta, P. 2004. Exploring the relationship between word processing and verbal short-term memory: evidence from associations and dissociations. Cognitive Neuropsychology 21, 213–28CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, R. 1995. Working memory doesn't work: a critique of Miyake et al.'s Capacity Theory of aphasia comprehension deficits. Cognitive Neuropsychology 12, 623–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R. and Blossom-Stach, C. 1986. Evidence of syntactic deficits in a fluent aphasic. Brain and Language 28, 196–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, C. and Edwards, S. 2002. Verb problems in fluent aphasia. Brain and Language 83, 42–4Google Scholar
McCann, C. and Edwards, S. 2003. Fractionating the comprehension deficit in fluent aphasia: adding to the data. Paper given at Verb Seminar: University College London
Miller, N., Willmes, K. and Bleser, R. 2000. The psychometric properties of the English language version of the Aachen Aphasia Test (EAAT). Aphasiology 14, 683–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A., Carpenter, P. and Just, M. 1994. A capacity approach to syntactic comprehension disorders: making normal adults perform like aphasic patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology 11, 671–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, J. 1990. Nonlexical grammatical deviations in ‘paragrammatic’ aphasia. Folia Linguistica 24, 389–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obler, L. and Gjerlow, K. 1999. Language and the brain.Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Ojemann, G. 1994. Cortical stimulation and recording in language. In Kertesz, A. (ed.), Localisation and neuroimaging in neuropsychology.New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Ouhalla, J. 1993. Functional categories, agrammatism and language acquisition. Linguistic Berichte 143, 3–36Google Scholar
Paulesu, E., Frith, E. and Frackowiak, R. 1993. The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory. Nature 362, 342–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penn, C. 2000. Aphasia in Afrikaans: a preliminary analysis. Paper given at Aphasia Rehabilitation Conference, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Pesetsky, D. 1987. Wh-in-situ: movement and unselective binding.Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Poeck, K. 1989. Fluency. In Code, C. (ed.), The characteristics of aphasia.Hove: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Poeppel, D. 1996. A critical review of PET studies of phonological processing. Brain and Language 55, 317–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollock, J. 1989. Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424Google Scholar
Pring, T. 2004. Ask a silly question: two decades of troublesome trials. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 39, 285–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prins, R., Snow, C. and Wagenaar, E. 1978. Recovery from aphasia: spontaneous speech versus language comprehension. Brain and Language 6, 192–211CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pustejovsky, J. 1995. The generative lexicon.Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S. and Leech, G. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language.Harlow: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartrik, J. 1972. A grammar of contemporary English.London: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Radford, A. 1997. Syntax: a Minimalist introduction.Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapcsak, S. and Rubens, A. 1994. Localization of lesions in transcortical aphasia. In Kertesz, A. (ed.), Localization and neuroimaging in neuroimaging in neuropsychology.London: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Rosen, S. T. 1996. Events and verb classification. Linguistics 34, 191–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffran, E., Berndt, R. and Schwartz, M. 1989. The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: procedures and data. Brain and Language 37, 440–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, M. 1987. Patterns of speech production deficits within and across aphasia syndromes: application of a psycholinguistic model. In Coltheart, M., Sartori, G. and Job, R. (eds.), The cognitive neuropsychology of language.Hove: Lawrence ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, M., Saffran, E., Myers, J. and Martin, R. 1994. Mapping therapy: a treatment program for agrammatism. Aphasiology 8, 19–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalice, T. 2004. On Harley on Rapp. Cognitive Neuropsychology 21, 41–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, L. 2000. Some recent investigations of gap filling in normal listeners: implications for normal and disordered language processing. In Grodzinsky, Y., Shapiro, L. and Swinney, D. (eds.), Language and the Brain.San Diego: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, L., Gordon, B., Hack, N. and Killackey, J. 1993. Verb-argument structure processing in complex sentences in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia. Brain and Language 45, 423–47CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapiro, L. and Levine, B. 1990. Verb processing during sentence comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language 38, 21–47CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, E. and Geva, A. 2000. Verbal working memory and its connections to language processing. In Grodinsky, Y., Shapiro, L. and Swinney, D. (eds.), Language and the Brain.San Diego: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Smith, N. 1999. Chomsky: ideas and ideals.Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swaab, T., Brown, C. and Hagoort, P. 1997. Spoken Sentence comprehension in aphasia: event-related potential evidence for a lexical integration deficit. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9, 1, 39–66CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swinney, D., Zurif, E. and Nicol, J. 1989 The effects of focal brain damage on sentence processing: an examination of the neurological organisation of a mental module. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1, 25–37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swinney, D., Zurif, E., Prather, P. and Love, T. 1996. The neurological distribution of processing operations underlying language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8, 174–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinney, D. and Zurif, E. 1995. Syntactic processing in aphasia. Brain and Language 50, 225–39CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, C. K. (in press). Functional neuro-imaging: applications for studying aphasia. In LaPointe, L. L. (ed.), Aphasia and related neurogenic language disorders. 3rd edn. New York: ThiemeGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C. K. and Faroqi Shah, Y. 2002. Models of sentence production. In Hillis, A. (ed.), The handbook of adult language disorders.New York: Psychology PressGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C. K., Lange, K., Schneider, S. and Shapiro, L. 1997. Agrammatic and non-brain damaged subjects' verb and argument structure production. Aphasiology 11, 473–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C. K., Fix, S., Gitelman, D., Parrish, T. and Mesulam, M. 2000. FMRI studies of agrammatic sentence comprehension before and after treatment. Brain and Language 74, 387–91Google Scholar
Thompson, C. K. and Shapiro, L. P. 1995. Training sentences in agrammatism: implications for normal and disordered language. Brain and Language 50, 201–24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, C. K., Shapiro, L., Kiran, S. and Sobecks, J. 2003. The role of syntactic complexity in treatment of sentence deficits in agrammatic aphasia: the complexity account of treatment efficacy (CATE). Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 46, 591–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C. K., Shapiro, L., Li, L. and Schendel, L. 1994. Analysis of verbs and verb argument structure: a method for quantification of agrammatic language production. Clinical Aphasiology 23, 121–40Google Scholar
Thompson, C. K., Shapiro, L. and Roberts, M. 1993. Treatment of sentence production deficits in aphasia: a linguistic-specific approach to wh-interrogative training and generalization. Aphasiology 7, 111–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, L. K., Bright, P., Fletcher, P. and Stamatakis, E. 2004. Neural processing of nouns and verbs: the role of inflectional morphology. Neuropsychologia 42, 512–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, L. K., Russell, R., Fadili, J. and Moss, H. 2001. The neural representation of nouns and verbs: PET studies. Brain 124, 1619–34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ullman, M., Corkin, S., Coppola, M., Hickok, G. and Koroshetz, W. et al. 1997. A neural dissociation within language: evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 30, 37–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallesch, C., Bak, T. and Schulle-Monting, J. 1992. Acute aphasia – patterns and prognosis. Aphasiology 6, 373–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wepman, J. and Jones, L. 1961. Language modality test for aphasia.Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Wernicke, C. 1874/1977. Der aphasische symptomencomplex: ein psychologische studie auf anatomische basis. In Eggert, G. H. (ed.), Wernicke's works on aphasia: a source book and review.The Hague: MoutonGoogle Scholar
Willmes, K. and Poeck, K. 1993. To what extent can aphasic syndromes be localised?Brain 116, 1527–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, R., Chollet, F., Hadar, U., Friston, K., Hoffner, E. and Frackowiak, R. 1991. Distribution of cortical neural networks involved in word comprehension and word retrieval. Cortex 114, 1803–17Google ScholarPubMed
Zingeser, I. and Berndt, R. 1990. Retrieval of nouns and verbs in agrammatism and anomia. Brain and Language 39, 14–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zurif, E. 1995. Brain regions of relevance to syntactic processing. In Gleitman, L. and Liberman, M. (eds.). Language.Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Zurif, E. and Pinange, M. 2000. Semantic composition: processing parameters and neuroanatomical considerations. In Bastiaanse, R. and Godzinsky, Y. (eds.), Grammatical disorders in aphasia: a neurolinguistic perspective.London: WhurrGoogle Scholar
Zurif, E. and Swinney, D. 1994. Neuropsychology of sentence comprehension. In Gernsbacher, M. A. (ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics.Orlando, FL: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Zurif, E., Swinney, D., Prather, P., Solomon, J. and Bushell, C. 1993. An on-line analysis of syntactic processing in Broca's aphasia and Wernicke's aphasia. Brain and Language 45, 448–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Susan Edwards, University of Reading
  • Book: Fluent Aphasia
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486548.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Susan Edwards, University of Reading
  • Book: Fluent Aphasia
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486548.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Susan Edwards, University of Reading
  • Book: Fluent Aphasia
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486548.010
Available formats
×