Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:45:58.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 10 - The Implications of Free Will Skepticism for Establishing Criminal Liability

from Part III - Free Will Skepticism and the Criminal Justice System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2019

By
Elizabeth Shaw
Edited by
Elizabeth Shaw ,
Derk Pereboom  and
Gregg D. Caruso
Elizabeth Shaw
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Derk Pereboom
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Gregg D. Caruso
Affiliation:
Corning Community College, State University of New York
Get access

Summary

This chapter discusses the implications of rejecting the notions of free will and retribution for the process of establishing criminal liability in a trial. It is a general principle of UK and American law that before a person can be convicted of a crime the prosecution must prove three things. Firstly, the accused must have performed the actus reus (the prohibited act). Secondly (with the exception of strict liability offences), the prosecution must prove mens rea, a mental state such as intention or recklessness. Thirdly, the accused must lack a valid defense, such as self-defense. This chapter argues that these prerequisites should be retained. It offers a rationale for these prerequisites that appeals to the value of liberty and moral communication but does not depend on the concepts of free will and retribution. This chapter then focuses on two defenses: self-defense and provocation. It argues that without these two concepts, the “right” to self-defense cannot be understood as a strong justification. Rather, self-defense involves permissible action. This chapter also argues that, without the concepts of free will and retribution, the partial defense of provocation cannot be based on the idea of justified anger but rather on understandable emotional distress.

Keywords

Free willretributivismcriminal responsibilitydefensesmens rea
Type
Chapter
Information
Free Will Skepticism in Law and Society
Challenging Retributive Justice
 , pp. 192 - 206
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bradley, M. C. (1959). A note on Mr. MacIntyre’s Determinism. Mind, 68, 521–526.Google Scholar
Callender, J. (2010). Free Will and Responsibility: A Guide for Practitioners. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1982). Mechanism and responsibility. In Watson, G., ed., Free Will: Oxford Readings in Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 127–173.Google Scholar
Double, R. (2002). Metaethics, metaphilosophy and free will subjectivism. In Kane, R., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 506–528.Google Scholar
Duff, R. A. (2001). Punishment, Communication and Community. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, J., and Cohen, J.. (2004). For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 359, 1775–1785.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1968). Punishment and Responsibility. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Honderich, T. (1984). Punishment: The Supposed Justifications. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Honderich, T. (2002). How Free Are You? The Determinism Problem, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, W. (2010). Self-defense, innocent aggressors and the duty of martyrdom. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 91(1), 78–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J. L. (1982). Morality and the retributive emotions. Criminal Justice Ethics, 1(1), 3–10.Google Scholar
Moore, M. (1997). Placing Blame: A Theory of Criminal Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pereboom, D. (2002). Living without free will: The case for hard incompatibilism. In Kane, R., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 477–488.Google Scholar
Pereboom, D. (2006). Reasons-responsiveness, alternative possibilities, and manipulation arguments against compatibilism: Reflections on John Martin Fischer’s My Way. Philosophical Books, 47(3), 198–212.Google Scholar
Pereboom, D. (2013). Free will skepticism and criminal punishment. In Nadelhoffer, T., ed., The Future of Punishment. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 49–78.Google Scholar
Sangero, B. (2008). In defense of Self-Defence in Criminal Law; and on Killing in Self-Defence – A reply to Fiona Leverick. Criminal Law Bulletin, 44(6), 1–34.Google Scholar
Strawson, G. (2002). The bounds of freedom. In Kane, R., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 441–460.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1962). Freedom and resentment. Proceedings of the British Academy, 48, 1–25.Google Scholar
Swinburne, R. (2004). The Existence of God, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tadros, V. (2011). The Ends of Harm: The Moral Foundations of the Criminal Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×