Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-07T17:55:38.730Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intensionality and coercion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2017

By
Michiel van Lambalgen  and
Fritz Hamm
Edited by
Reinhard Kähle
Reinhard Kähle
Affiliation:
Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal
Get access

Summary

Abstract. Frege informally characterized intension or Sinn as Art des Gegebenseins, that is, ‘mode of presentation’ of an object or event. The linguistic phenomenon of coercion, as exemplified by the shift in aspectual class of the verb ‘love’ from state in (a) to activity in (c):

(a) I love her.

(b) * I am loving her.

(c) I am loving her more and more every day, the more I get to know her.

thus falls in the domain of intensional phenomena. We present a fully computational theory of aspectual coercion, based on the event calculus of Aritificial Intelligence, as reformulated in constraint logic programming. The cognitive background of this formalism, as well as other applications to tense and aspect, can be found in the authors’ The Proper Treatment of Events (Blackwell 2004).

Aspectual coercion as an intensional phenomenon. Ever since Vendler's famous classification of verbs with respect to their time schemata, linguists have distinguished at least four aspectual classes or Aktionsarten. These classes comprise states, activities, accomplishments, achievements and points, which are exemplified in (1) to (5).

  1. (1) States: know, love, be beautiful.

  2. (2) Activities: run, push a cart, draw.

  3. (3) Accomplishments: cross the street, build a house, draw a letter.

  4. (4) Achievements: begin, reach, arrive.

  5. (5) Points: flash, spot, blink.

Several linguistic tests were developed to distinguish aspectual classes. For example, adverbial modification with for two hours is possible with activities (John ran for two hours) but not with accomplishments (*John built a house for two years) or achievements. Temporal modification with the adverbial in two hours shows the reverse pattern. Usually only activities and accomplishments can occur in the progressive. Expressions like *knowing the answer are ungrammatical. But there is also a crucial difference in the behaviour of activities and accomplishments with respect to their progressivised forms. From John was pushing a cart we can infer that John pushed a cart. However, the inference from John was crossing the street to John crossed the street is invalid. This phenomenon was dubbed the “imperfective paradox” by Dowty.

Type
Chapter
Information
Intensionality , pp. 97 - 122
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] E., Bach, The algebra of events, Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 9 (1986), pp. 5–16.Google Scholar
[2] G., Bealer and U., Mönnich, Property theories, Handbook of philosophical logic. Vol. IV (D., Gabbay and F., Guenthner, editors), Reidel, Dordrecht, 1989.
[3] W., Croft, The structure of events, The new psychology of language (M., Tomasello, editor), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,Mahwah, NJ, 1998.
[4] H., de Swart, Aspect shift and coercion, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol. 16 (1998), pp. 347–385.Google Scholar
[5] J., Dölling, Polysemy and sort coercion in semantic representation, Discourse and lexical meaning (P., Bosch and P., Gerstl, editors), Arbeitspapiere des SFB 340, Nr. 30, Stuttgart/Tübingen, 1993.
[6] D., Dowty, Word meaning and montague grammar, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1979.
[7] D., Dowty, Thematic proto–roles and argument selection, Language, vol. 67 (1991), pp. 547– 619.Google Scholar
[8] M., Egg, Flexible semantic construction: the case of reinterpretation, Habilitationsschrift, Universität des Saarlandes, 2000.
[9] S., Feferman, Toward useful type-free theories I, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 49 (1984), pp. 75–111.
[10] F., Hamm and M., van Lambalgen, Event calculus, nominalisation and the progressive, Research report, ILLC, Amsterdam,December 2000, 76 pp. to appear in Linguistics and Philosophy. Available at http://www.semanticsarchive.net.
[11] A., Kratzer, Building statives, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, 2002.
[12] F., Landman, The progressive, Natural Language Semantics, vol. 1 (1992), pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
[13] L., Michaelis, Aunification-based model of aspectual type-shifting, University of Colorado at Boulder, 2001.
[14] M., Moens and M., Steedman, Temporal ontology and temporal reference, Computational Linguistics, vol. 14 (1988), pp. 15–28.Google Scholar
[15] T., Parsons, Events in the semantics of English, MIT University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990.
[16] S., Pulman, Aspectual shift as type coercion, Transaction of the Philological Society, vol. 95 (1997), pp. 279–317.Google Scholar
[17] J., Pustejovsky, Type coercion and lexical selection, Semantics and the lexicon (J., Pustejovsky, editor), Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1993.
[18] J., Saul, Substitution and simple sentences, Analysis, vol. 57 (1997), pp. 114–118.Google Scholar
[19] M.P., Shanahan, Solving the frame problem, The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge,MA, 1997.
[20] M., Stitors, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1997, pp. 895–938.
[21] P.J., Seedman, Temporality, Handbook of logic and language (J., van Benthem and A., ter Meulen, edtuckey, Negation and constraint logic programming, Information and Computation, vol. 118 (1995), pp. 12–33.Google Scholar
[22] M., van Lambalgen and F., Hamm, Events in time: Logic, semantics and cognition, Blackwell, Malden, 2004.
[23] M., van Lambalgen and F., Hamm, Moschovakis's notion of meaning as applied to linguistics, Logic Colloquium '01 (M., Baaz, S., Friedman, and J., Krajček, editors), AK Peters, 2005, pp. 255–280.
[24] H., Verkuyl, A theory of aspectuality. the interaction between temporal and atemporal structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×