References

Tracy Sulkin

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511616013.012

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 January 2010

Tracy Sulkin

Show author details

Tracy Sulkin: Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Issue Politics in Congress , pp. 193 - 202

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616013.012 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. 1980. “A Comparison of Voting for U.S. Senator and Representative in 1978.” American Political Science Review 74(3): 633–40CrossRef Google Scholar

Abramowitz, Alan I. and Segal., Jeffrey A. 1992. Senate Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar

Achen, Christopher H. 1977. “Measuring Representation: Perils of the Correlation Coefficient.” American Journal of Political Science 21(4): 805–15CrossRef Google Scholar

Achen, Christopher H. 1978. “Measuring Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 22(3): 475–510CrossRef Google Scholar

Ahuja, Sunil. 1994. “Electoral Status and Representation in the United States Senate.” American Politics Quarterly 22(1): 104–18CrossRef Google Scholar

Ainsworth, Scott H. and Thad E. Hall. 2001. “Ties That Bind: Participation and Coordination in the U.S. Congress.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago

Ansolabehere, Stephen and Iyengar., Shanto 1995. Going Negative: How Attack Ads Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar

Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Arnold, R. Douglas. 2004. Congress, the Press, and Political Accountability. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Bachrach, Peter and Baratz, Morton. 1962. “Two Faces of Power.” American Political Science Review 56(4): 947–52CrossRef Google Scholar

Baker, Ross K. 1989. House and Senate. New York: W. W. Norton & CompanyGoogle Scholar

Bauer, Raymond, Sola Pool, Ithiel, and Dexter, Lewis Anthony. 1963. American Business and Public Policy. New York: Atherton PressGoogle Scholar

Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jones, Bryan D.. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jones, Bryan D., eds. 2002. Policy Dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Baumgartner, Frank R., Jones, Bryan D., and MacLeod, Michael C.. 2000. “The Evolution of Bureaucratic Institutions.” Journal of Politics 62(2): 321–49CrossRef Google Scholar

Bendor, Jonathan and Moe, Terry M.. 1985. “An Adaptive Model of Bureaucratic Politics.” American Political Science Review 79(3): 755–74CrossRef Google Scholar

Benenson, Bob. 1988. “Election Guide 1988: New York Outlook.” CQ Weekly, October 15, 1988, 2926Google Scholar

Benenson, Bob. 1990. “Election 1990: Kansas Outlook.” CQ Weekly, October 13, 1990, 3310Google Scholar

Bernstein, Robert A. 1977. “Divisive Primaries Do Hurt: U.S. Senate Races, 1956–1972.” American Political Science Review 71(2): 540–45Google Scholar

Bernstein, Robert A. 1988. “Do U.S. Senators Moderate Strategically?” American Political Science Review 82(1): 237–41CrossRef Google Scholar

Bernstein, Robert A. 1989. Elections, Representation, and Congressional Voting Behavior: The Myth of Constituency Control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice HallGoogle Scholar

Bianco, William T. 1994. Trust: Representatives & Constituents. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Bickers, Kenneth N. and Stein, Robert M.. 1996. “The Electoral Dynamics of the Federal Pork Barrel.” American Journal of Political Science 40(4): 1300–26CrossRef Google Scholar

Birkland, Thomas A. 1997. After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy, and Focusing Events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University PressGoogle Scholar

Bohman, James. 1996. Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Bond, Jon R. 1985. “Dimensions of District Attention Over Time.” American Journal of Political Science 29(2): 330–47CrossRef Google Scholar

Bond, Jon, Covington, Cary, and Fleisher, Richard. 1985. “Explaining Challenger Quality in Congressional Elections.” Journal of Politics 47(2): 510–29CrossRef Google Scholar

Born, Richard. 1981. “The Influence of House Primary Election Divisiveness on General Election Margins, 1962–76.” Journal of Politics 43(3): 640–61CrossRef Google Scholar

Brady, David W., Brandice Canes-Wrone, and John F. Cogan. 2000. “Differences Between Winning and Losing Incumbents.” In Change and Continuity in House Elections, ed. Brady, David W., Cogan, John F., and Fiorina, Morris. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar

Bragdon, Peter. 1988. “Election Guide 1988: Mississippi Outlook.” CQ Weekly, October 15, 1988, 2912–14Google Scholar

Bullock, Charles S. 1973. “Committee Transfers in the United States House of Representatives.” Journal of Politics 35(1): 85–120CrossRef Google Scholar

Burden, Barry C. and Kimball, David C.. 2002. Why Americans Split Their Tickets: Campaigns, Competition, and Divided Government. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip, Miller, Warren, and Stokes, Donald. 1960. The American Voter. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar

Campbell, James E. 1982. “Cosponsoring Legislation in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 7(4): 415–22CrossRef Google Scholar

Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Brady, David W., and Cogan, John F.. 2002. “Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members' Voting.” American Political Science Review 96(1): 127–40CrossRef Google Scholar

Canon, David T. 1993. “Sacrificial Lambs or Strategic Politicians? Political Amateurs in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 37(4): 1119–41CrossRef Google Scholar

Carsey, Thomas M. 2000. Campaign Dynamics: The Race for Governor. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Cassata, Donna. 1997. “Vocational Program Gets Panel OK.” CQ Weekly, June 14, 1997, 1378–9Google Scholar

Cnudde, Charles F. and McCrone, Donald J.. 1966. “The Linkage Between Constituency Attitudes and Congressional Voting Behavior: A Causal Model.” American Political Science Review 60(1): 66–72CrossRef Google Scholar

Cobb, Roger W. and Elder, Charles D.. 1983. Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building. Boston: Allyn and Bacon

Cook, Rhodes. 1990. “Election 1990: Missouri Outlook.” CQ Weekly, October 13, 1990, 3326–7Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Davidson, Roger H. and Oleszek, Walter J.. 1996. Congress and Its Members, 5th edition. Washington, DC: CQ PressGoogle Scholar

Deckard, Barbara Sinclair. 1976. “Electoral Marginality and Party Loyalty in House Roll Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 20(3): 469–81CrossRef Google Scholar

Delli Carpini, Michael X. and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Downs, Anthony. 1972. “Up and Down with Ecology: The Issue Attention Cycle.” The Public Interest 28(2): 38–50Google Scholar

Duncan, Phil. 1988. “Indiana 5: Jontz vs. Williams A Standout in the Heartland.” CQ Weekly, October 29, 1988, 3102Google Scholar

Duncan, Phil, ed. 1993. CQ's Politics in America. Washington, DC: Congressional QuarterlyGoogle Scholar

Elling, Richard C. 1982. “Ideological Change in the U.S. Senate: Time and Electoral Responsiveness.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 7(1): 75–92CrossRef Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert S. 1971. “The Electoral Impact of Congressional Roll Call Voting.” American Political Science Review 65(4): 1018–32CrossRef Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert S. 1978. “Constituency Opinion and Congressional Behavior: A Reexamination of the Miller–Stokes Representation Data.” American Journal of Political Science 22(3): 511–35CrossRef Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Erikson, Robert S. and Gerald C. Wright. 1993. “Voters, Candidates, and Issues in Congressional Elections.” In Congress Reconsidered, 5th edition, ed. Dodd, Lawrence and Oppenheimer, Bruce. Washington, DC: CQ PressGoogle Scholar

Eulau, Heinz and Karps, Paul D.. 1977. “The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Responsiveness.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 2(3): 233–54CrossRef Google Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, BrownGoogle Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Home Style. Boston: Little, BrownGoogle Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. 1989. The Making of a Senator: Dan Quayle. Washington, DC: CQ PressGoogle Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. 1996. Senators on the Campaign Trail: The Politics of Representation. Norman: University of Oklahoma PressGoogle Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1973. “Electoral Margins, Constituency Influence, and Policy Moderation: A Critical Assessment.” American Politics Quarterly 1(4): 479–98CrossRef Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1974. Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies. Boston: D. C. HeathGoogle Scholar

Fowler, Linda L., Douglass, Scott R., and Clark, Wesley D. Jr. 1980. “The Electoral Effects of House Committee Assignments.” Journal of Politics 42(1): 307–19CrossRef Google Scholar

Fraley, Colette. 1995. “Senate Votes to Reauthorize Ryan White AIDS Program.” CQ Weekly, July 29, 1995, 2277–8Google Scholar

Franklin, Charles H. 1991. “Eschewing Obfuscation? Campaigns and the Perception of U.S. Senate Incumbents.” American Political Science Review 85(4): 1193–1214CrossRef Google Scholar

Freedman, Paul and Goldstein, Kenneth. 1999. “Measuring Media Exposure and the Effects of Negative Campaign Ads.” American Journal of Political Science 43(4): 1189–1208CrossRef Google Scholar

Greenblatt, Alan and Elving, Robert D.. 1996. “Election Preview: California.” CQ Weekly, October 19, 1996, 2974Google Scholar

Gronke, Paul. 2000. The Electorate, the Campaign, and the Office: A Unified Approach to Senate and House Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Groseclose, Timothy and Krehbiel, Keith. 1994. “Golden Parachutes, Rubber Checks, and Strategic Retirements from the 102nd House.” American Journal of Political Science 38(1): 75–99CrossRef Google Scholar

Hale, Jon F. 1987. “The Scribes of Texas: Newspaper Coverage of the 1984 U.S. Senate Campaign.” In Campaigns in the News: Mass Media and Congressional Elections, ed. Vermeer, J. P.. New York: Greenwood PressGoogle Scholar

Hall, Richard L. 1996. Participation in Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Hart, Roderick P. 2000. Campaign Talk: Why Elections Are Good for Us. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Herrnson, Paul S. 1998. Congressional Elections, 2nd edition. Washington, DC: CQ PressGoogle Scholar

Hershey, Marjorie Randon. 1984. Running for Office: The Political Education of Campaigners. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House PublishersGoogle Scholar

Hill, Kim Quaile and Hurley, Patricia A.. 1999. “Dyadic Representation Reappraised.” American Journal of Political Science 43(1): 109–37CrossRef Google Scholar

Hinckley, Barbara. 1980. “House Re-Elections and Senate Defeats: The Role of the Challenger.” British Journal of Political Science 10(4): 441–60CrossRef Google Scholar

Holbrook, Thomas M. 1996. Do Campaigns Matter?Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Hurley, Patricia A. 1982. “Collective Representation Reappraised.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 7(1): 119–36CrossRef Google Scholar

Hurley, Patricia A. and Hill, Kim Quaile. 2003. “Beyond the Demand-Input Model: A Theory of Representational Linkages.” Journal of Politics 65(2): 304–26CrossRef Google Scholar

Idelson, Holly. 1990. “Election 1990: Washington Outlook.” CQ Weekly, October 13, 1990, 3354Google Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto and Kinder, Donald R.. 1987. News That Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 2000. Politicians Don't Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness.Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 1996. “The 1994 House Elections in Perspective.” Political Science Quarterly 111(2): 203–23CrossRef Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 2001. The Politics of Congressional Elections, 5th edition. New York: LongmanGoogle Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. and Dimock, Michael A.. 1994. “Checking Out: The Effects of Bank Overdrafts on the 1992 House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 38(3): 601–24CrossRef Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. and Kernell, Samuel. 1983. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections, 2nd edition. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Jewell, Malcolm E. 1983. “Legislator–Constituency Relations and the Representative Process.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 8(3): 303–37CrossRef Google Scholar

Johannes, John R. 1984. To Serve the People: Congress and Constituency Service. Lincoln: University of Nebraska PressGoogle Scholar

Johannes, John R. and McAdams, John C.. 1981. “The Congressional Incumbency Effect: Is It Casework, Policy Compatibility, or Something Else? An Examination of the 1978 Election.” American Journal of Political Science 25(3): 512–42CrossRef Google Scholar

Johnson, Charles. 2003. How Our Laws Are Made. Washington, DC: Government Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar

Jones, Bryan D. 1973. “Competitiveness, Role Orientations, and Legislative Responsiveness.” Journal of Politics 35(4): 924–47CrossRef Google Scholar

Jones, Bryan D. 1994. Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Jones, Bryan D. 2001. Politics and the Architecture of Choice: Bounded Rationality and Governance. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Jones, Bryan D. and Baumgartner, Frank R.. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Jones, Bryan D., Baumgartner, Frank R., and Talbert, Jeffery C.. 1993. “The Destruction of Issue Monopolies in Congress.” American Political Science Review 87(3): 657–71CrossRef Google Scholar

Kahn, Kim Fridkin. 1991. “Senate Elections in the News: Examining Campaign Coverage.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 16(3): 349–74CrossRef Google Scholar

Kahn, Kim Fridkin and Kenney, Patrick J.. 1999. The Spectacle of U.S. Senate Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, Dave. 1988. “Election Guide 1988: South Dakota Outlook.” CQ Weekly, October 15, 1988, 2942Google Scholar

Kaplan, Dave. 1990. “Election Guide 1990: Montana Outlook.” CQ Weekly, October 13, 1990, 3327Google Scholar

Katz, Jeffrey L. 1997. “GOP School Plans Get Retooling.” CQ Weekly, December 13, 1997, 3062–5Google Scholar

Kenney, Patrick J. 1988. “Sorting Out the Effects of Primary Divisiveness in Congressional and Senatorial Elections.” Western Political Quarterly 41(4): 765–77CrossRef Google Scholar

Kessler, Daniel and Krehbiel, Keith. 1996. “Dynamics of Cosponsorship.” American Political Science Review 90(3): 555–66CrossRef Google Scholar

King, David C. 1997. Turf Wars: How Congressional Committees Claim Jurisdiction. Chicago: University of Chicago PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Kingdon, John W. 1968. Candidates for Office: Beliefs and Strategies. New York: Random HouseGoogle Scholar

Kingdon, John W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Little, BrownGoogle Scholar

Kingdon, John W. 1989. Congressmen's Voting Decisions. New York: Harper & RowCrossRef Google Scholar

Krasno, Jonathan S. 1994. Challengers, Competition, and Reelection: Comparing Senate and House Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Krasno, Jonathan S. and Green, Donald Philip. 1988. “Preempting Quality Challengers in House Elections.” Journal of Politics 50(4): 920–36CrossRef Google Scholar

Krutz, Glen S. 2000. “Congressional Leaders and the Winnowing of Legislation.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC

Kuklinski, James H. 1977. “District Competitiveness and Legislative Roll-Call Behavior: A Reassessment of the Marginality Hypothesis.” American Journal of Political Science 21(3): 627–38CrossRef Google Scholar

Kuklinski, James H. 1978. “Representativeness and Elections: A Policy Analysis.” American Political Science Review 72(1): 165–77CrossRef Google Scholar

Kuklinski, James H. and Elling, Richard C.. 1977. “Representational Role, Constituency Opinion, and Legislative Roll-Call Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science 21(1): 135–47CrossRef Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Berelson, Bernard, and Gaudet, Hazel. 1944. The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Duell, Sloan, and PearceGoogle Scholar

Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Lublin, David I. 1994. “Quality, Not Quantity: Strategic Politicians in U.S. Senate Elections, 1952–1990.” Journal of Politics 56(1): 228–41CrossRef Google Scholar

MacPerson, Peter. 1995. “Senate Panel OKs Ryan White Act.” CQ Weekly, April 1, 1995, 947–8Google Scholar

Mann, Thomas E. 1978. Unsafe at Any Margin: Interpreting Congressional Elections. Washington, DC: American Enterprise InstituteGoogle Scholar

Mann, Thomas E. and Wolfinger, Raymond E.. 1980. “Candidates and Parties in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 74(3): 617–32CrossRef Google Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97(4): 515–28CrossRef Google Scholar

Marcus, George E. and MacKuen, Michael B.. 1993. “Anxiety, Enthusiasm, and the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and Involvement During Presidential Campaigns.” American Political Science Review 87(3): 672–85CrossRef Google Scholar

Matthews, Donald R. 1960. U.S. Senators and Their World. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina PressGoogle Scholar

Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Mayhew, David R. 1991. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946–1990. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

McCombs, Maxwell E. and Shaw, Donald L.. 1972. “The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media.” Public Opinion Quarterly 36(2): 176–87CrossRef Google Scholar

McCrone, Donald J. and Kuklinski, James H.. 1979. “The Delegate Theory of Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 23(2): 278–300CrossRef Google Scholar

McCrone, Donald J. and Stone, Walter J.. 1986. “The Structure of Constituency Representation: On Theory and Method.” Journal of Politics 48(4): 956–75CrossRef Google Scholar

Miller, Warren E. and Shanks, J. Merrill. 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Miller, Warren E. and Stokes, Donald E.. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57(1): 45–56CrossRef Google Scholar

Moss, Bill. 1992. “He Has Drive, But No Fuel.” St. Petersburg Times, October 28, 1992, 1BGoogle Scholar

Neuman, W. Russell. 1986. The Paradox of Mass Politics: Knowledge and Opinion in the American Electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Nie, Norman H., Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John R.. 1976. The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Ornstein, Norman J., Mann, Thomas E., and Malbin, Michael J.. 1990. Vital Statistics on Congress, 1989–1990. Washington, DC: Congressional QuarterlyGoogle Scholar

Ornstein, Norman J., Mann, Thomas E., and Malbin, Michael J.. 1992. Vital Statistics on Congress, 1991–1992. Washington, DC: Congressional QuarterlyGoogle Scholar

Ornstein, Norman J., Mann, Thomas E., and Malbin, Michael J.. 1994. Vital Statistics on Congress, 1993–1994.Washington, DC: Congressional QuarterlyGoogle Scholar

Ornstein, Norman J., Mann, Thomas E., and Malbin, Michael J.. 1996. Vital Statistics on Congress, 1995–1996. Washington, DC: Congressional QuarterlyGoogle Scholar

Ornstein, Norman J., Mann, Thomas E., and Malbin, Michael J.. 1998. Vital Statistics on Congress, 1997–1998. Washington, DC: Congressional QuarterlyGoogle Scholar

Page, Benjamin I. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences.Chicago: University of Chicago PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Page, Benjamin I., Shapiro, Robert Y., Gronke, Paul W., and Rosenberg, Robert M.. 1984. “Constituency, Party, and Representation in Congress.” Public Opinion Quarterly 48(4): 741–56CrossRef Google Scholar

Parker, Glenn R. 1980. “Sources of Change in Congressional District Attentiveness.” American Journal of Political Science 24(1): 115–24CrossRef Google Scholar

Patterson, Thomas. 1993. Out of Order. New York: Random HouseGoogle Scholar

Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Polsby, Nelson W. and Schickler, Eric. 2002. “Landmarks in the Study of Congress Since 1945.” Annual Review of Political Science 5: 333–67CrossRef Google Scholar

Ragsdale, Lyn and Cook, Timothy E.. 1987. “Representatives' Actions and Challengers' Reactions: Limits to Candidate Connections in the House.” American Journal of Political Science 31(1): 45–81CrossRef Google Scholar

Riker, William H. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Salisbury, Robert H. and Shepsle, Kenneth A.. 1981. “U.S. Congressman as Enterprise.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 6(4): 559–76CrossRef Google Scholar

Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semisovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart and WinstonGoogle Scholar

Schiller, Wendy J. 1995. “Senators as Political Entrepreneurs: Using Bill Sponsorship to Shape Legislative Agendas.” American Journal of Political Science 39(1): 186–203CrossRef Google Scholar

Schiller, Wendy J. 2000. Partners and Rivals: Representation in U.S. Senate Delegations. Princeton: Princeton, NJ: University PressGoogle Scholar

Sellers, Patrick J. 1998. “Strategy and Background in Congressional Campaigns.” American Political Science Review 92(1): 159–71CrossRef Google Scholar

Shapiro, Catherine R., Brady, David W., Brody, Richard, and Ferejohn, John A.. 1990. “Linking Constituency Opinion and Senate Voting Scores: A Hybrid Explanation.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 15(4): 599–622CrossRef Google Scholar

Shaw, Eugene F. 1977. “The Interpersonal Agenda.” In The Emergence of American Political Issues: The Agenda-Setting Function of the Press, ed. Shaw, Donald and McCombs, Maxwell. St. Paul, MN: West PublishingGoogle Scholar

Simon, Adam F. 2002. The Winning Message: Candidate Behavior, Campaign Discourse, and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 1989. The Transformation of the U.S. Senate.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar

Spiliotes, Constantine J. and Vavreck, Lynn. 2002. “Campaign Advertising: Partisan Convergence or Divergence?” Journal of Politics 64(1): 249–61CrossRef Google Scholar

Squire, Peverill. 1989. “Challengers in U.S. Senate Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 14(4): 531–47CrossRef Google Scholar

Squire, Peverill. 1992. “Challenger Quality and Voting Behavior in U.S. Senate Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17(2): 247–63CrossRef Google Scholar

Stimson, James A., MacKuen, Michael B., and Erikson, Robert S.. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review 89(3): 543–65CrossRef Google Scholar

Stone, Walter J. 1979. “Measuring Constituency–Representative Linkages: Problems and Prospects.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 4(4): 623–39CrossRef Google Scholar

Stone, Walter J. 1982. “Electoral Change and Policy Representation in Congress: Domestic Welfare Issues from 1956–1972.” British Journal of Political Science 12(1): 95–115CrossRef Google Scholar

Sullivan, John L. and Uslaner, Eric M.. 1978. “Congressional Behavior and Electoral Marginality.” American Journal of Political Science 22(3): 536–53CrossRef Google Scholar

Talbert, Jeffrey C., Jones, Bryan D., and Baumgartner, Frank R.. 1995. “Nonlegislative Hearings and Policy Change in Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 39(2): 383–406CrossRef Google Scholar

Wahlke, John C. 1971. “Policy Demands and System Support: The Role of the Represented.” British Journal of Political Science 1(3): 271–90CrossRef Google Scholar

Walker, Jack. 1977. “Setting the Agenda in the U.S. Senate: A Theory of Problem Selection.” British Journal of Political Science 7(4): 423–45CrossRef Google Scholar

Wattenberg, Martin P. and Brians, Craig Leonard. 1999. “Negative Campaign Advertising: Demobilizer or Mobilizer?” American Political Science Review 93(4): 891–99CrossRef Google Scholar

Wawro, Gregory. 2000. Legislative Entrepreneurship in the U.S. House of Representatives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Weissberg, Robert. 1978. “Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in Congress.” American Political Science Review 72(2): 535–47CrossRef Google Scholar

Weissberg, Robert. 1979. “Assessing Legislator–Constituency Policy Agreement.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 4(4): 605–22CrossRef Google Scholar

Westlye, Mark C. 1991. Senate Elections and Campaign Intensity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar

Wilson, Rick K. and Young, Cheryl D.. 1997. “Cosponsorship in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22(1): 25–43CrossRef Google Scholar

Wright, Gerald C. and Berkman, Michael B.. 1986. “Candidates and Policy in United States Senate Elections.” American Political Science Review 80(2): 567–88CrossRef Google Scholar

Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Zaller, John R. 1998. “Politicians as Prize Fighters: Electoral Selection and Incumbency Advantage.” In Party Politics and Politicians, ed. Geer, John. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar