Bibliography

Olivia Elder; Alex Mullen

doi:10.1017/9781108647649.008

Adams, J. N. (1982), The Latin Sexual Vocabulary (London).Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1990), ‘The Latinity of C. Novius Eunus’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 82, 227–47.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1995), ‘The language of the Vindolanda writing tablets: an interim report’, Journal of Roman Studies, 85, 86–134.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2003a), Bilingualism and the Latin Language (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2003b), ‘“Romanitas” and the Latin language’, Classical Quarterly, 53(1), 184–205.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2013), Social Variation and the Latin Language (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2016), An Αnthology of Ιnformal Latin, 200 BC–AD 900: Fifty Texts with Translations and Linguistic Commentary (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Adams, J. N., Janse, M., and Swain, S. (2002), Bilingualism in Ancient Society. Language Contact and the Written Text (Oxford).Google Scholar

Altman, J. G. (1982), Epistolarity: Approaches to a Form (Columbus).Google Scholar

Auer, P. (1984), Bilingual Conversation (Amsterdam).Google Scholar

Auer, P. (ed.) (1998a), Code-Switching in Conversation: Language, Interaction and Identity (London/New York).Google Scholar

Auer, P. (1998b), ‘Introduction. Bilingual Conversation revisited’, in Auer, P. (ed.), Code-Switching in Conversation: Language, Interaction and Identity (London/New York), 1–24.Google Scholar

Baldwin, B. (1992), ‘Greek in Cicero’s letters’, Acta Classica, 35, 1–17.Google Scholar

Baltussen, H. (2009), ‘A grief observed: Cicero on remembering Tullia’, Mortality, 14(4), 355–69.Google Scholar

Barrios-Lech, P. (2016), Linguistic Interaction in Roman Comedy (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Beard, M. (2002), ‘Ciceronian correspondence: making a book out of letters’, in Wiseman, T. P. (ed.), Classics in Progress: Essays on Ancient Greece and Rome (Oxford), 103–44.Google Scholar

Behrendt, A. (2013), Mit Zitaten kommunizieren. Untersuchungen zur Zitierweise in der Korrespondenz des Marcus Tullius Cicero (Rahden).Google Scholar

Benet-Martínez, V. and Haritatos, J. (2005), ‘Bicultural Identity Integration (BII): components and psychosocial antecedents’, Journal of Personality, 73(4), 1015–49.Google Scholar

Bergmann, B. (1995), ‘Visualising Pliny’s villas’, Journal of Roman Archaeology, 8, 406–20.Google Scholar

Bergmann, B. (2007), ‘A painted garland: weaving words and images in the House of the Epigrams in Pompeii’, in Newby, Z. and Leader-Newby, R. (eds.), Art and Inscriptions in the Ancient World (Cambridge), 60–101.Google Scholar

Bernard, J.-E. (2013), La sociabilité épistolaire chez Cicéron (Paris).Google Scholar

Berthet, J. F. (1978), ‘La culture Homérique des Césars d’après Suétone’, Revue des Études Latines, 46, 314–34.Google Scholar

Best, E. E. (1976), ‘The use of Greek among the Julio-Claudian emperors’, Classical Bulletin, 53, 39–45.Google Scholar

Beutel, F. (2000), Vergangenheit als Politik: neue Aspekte im Werk des jüngeren Plinius (Frankfurt).Google Scholar

Birch, R. A. (1981), ‘The correspondence of Augustus: some notes on Suetonius, Tiberius 21.4–7’, Classical Quarterly, 31, 155–61.Google Scholar

Biville, F. (1995), Les emprunts du latin au grec. Approche phonétique. Tome 2. Vocalisme et conclusions (Louvain/Paris).Google Scholar

Biville, F. (2003), ‘Échos de voix romaines dans la correspondance de Cicéron. Réflexions sur l’oralité’, in Garcea, A. (ed.), Colloquia absentium. Studi sulla comunicazione epistolare in Cicerone (Turin), 13–45.Google Scholar

Biville, F., Decourt, J.-C., and Rougemont, G. (eds.) (2008), Bilinguisme gréco-latin et épigraphie (Lyon).Google Scholar

Blom, J.-P. and Gumperz, J. J. (1972), ‘Social meaning in linguistic structure: code-switching in Norway’, in Gumperz, J. J. and Hymes, D. (eds.), Direction in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication (New York), 407–34.Google Scholar

Bourne, E. (1918), ‘Augustus as a letter writer’, Transactions of the American Philological Association, 49, 53–66.Google Scholar

Bowersock, G. W. (1965), Augustus and the Greek World (Oxford).Google Scholar

Brock, M. D. (1911), Studies in Fronto and His Age: with an Appendix on African Latinity Illustrated by Selections from the Correspondence of Fronto (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Brunt, P. (1986), ‘Cicero’s officium during the civil war’, Journal of Roman Studies, 76, 12–32.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. (1988), ‘Amicitia in the Late Roman Republic’, in Brunt, P. (ed.), The Fall of the Roman Republic and Related Essays (Oxford), 351–81.Google Scholar

Callahan, L. (2004), Spanish/English Codeswitching in a Written Corpus (Amsterdam/Philadelphia).Google Scholar

Callebat, L. (2013), ‘Quod Graece dicitur’, in Garcea, A., Lhommé, M.-K. and Vallat, D. (eds.), Polyphonia Romana, vol. I (Hildesheim/Zurich/New York), 351–58.Google Scholar

Carlon, M. J. (2009), Pliny’s Women: Constructing Virtue and Creating Identity in the Roman World (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Chahoud, A. (2004), ‘The Roman satirist speaks Greek’, Classics Ireland, 11, 1–46.Google Scholar

Champlin, E. (1974), ‘The chronology of Fronto’, Journal of Roman Studies, 64, 136–59.Google Scholar

Champlin, E. (1980), Fronto and Antonine Rome (Cambridge, ma).Google Scholar

Citroni-Marchetti, S. (2009), ‘Words and silence: Atticus as the dedicatee of De amicitia’, Classical World, 103, 93–99.Google Scholar

Claassen, J.-M. (2007), ‘Fronto avus: the tale of a grandfather’, Akroterion, 52, 49–59.Google Scholar

Claassen, J.-M. (2009), ‘Cornelius Fronto: a “Libyan nomad” at Rome’, Acta Classica, 52, 47–71.Google Scholar

Clackson, J. (2015a), Language and Society in the Greek and Roman Worlds (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Clackson, J. (2015b), ‘Latinitas, Ἑλληνισμός and standard languages’, Studi e Saggi Linguistici, 53(2), 309–30.Google Scholar

Clark, A. (2013), ‘Ciceronian correspondances? Gods as elements of social communication (Att.1.13, 1.16 and 1.18)’. Working paper available on academia.edu.Google Scholar

Cooley, A. E. (2007), ‘The publication of Roman official documents in the Greek East’, in Lomas, K., Whitehouse, R. D. and Wilkins, J. B. (eds.), Literacy and the State in the Ancient Mediterranean (London), 203–18.Google Scholar

Corbeill, A. (2013), ‘The intellectual milieu of the Late Republic’, in Steel, C. E. W. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero (Cambridge), 9–24.Google Scholar

Cotton, H. M. (1985). ‘Mirificum genus commendationis: Cicero and the Latin letter of recommendation’, American Journal of Philology, 106(3), 328–34.Google Scholar

Cotton, H. M., Hoyland, R. G., Price, J. J. and Wasserstein, D. (eds.) (2009), From Hellenism to Islam. Cultural and Linguistic Change in the Roman Near East (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Coudry, M. (1994), ‘Sénatus-consultes et acta senatus: rédaction, conservation et archivage des documents émanant du sénat, de l’époque de César à celle des Sévères’, in Demougin, S. (ed.), La mémoire perdue: à la recherche des archives oubliées, publiques et privées, de la Rome antique (Paris), 65–102.Google Scholar

Crook, J. A. (1957), ‘Suetonius “ab epistulis”’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 4, 18–22.Google Scholar

Cugusi, P. (1983), Evoluzione e forme dell’epistolografia latina nella tarda repubblica e nei primi due secoli dell’impero, con cenni sull’epistolografia preciceroniana (Rome).Google Scholar

Davenport, C. and Manley, J. (2014), Fronto: Selected Letters (London/New York).Google Scholar

De Biasi, L. and Ferrero, A. M. (2003), Cesare Augusto Imperatore, gli atti compiuti e i frammenti delle opere (Turin).Google Scholar

Deane, S. N. (1918a), ‘Greek in Pliny’s letters’, Classical Weekly, 12(6), 41–4.Google Scholar

Deane, S. N. (1918b), ‘Greek in Pliny’s letters (concluded)’, Classical Weekly, 12(7), 50–4.Google Scholar

Della Corte, F. (1958), Svetonio: eques Romanus (Milan).Google Scholar

Dench, E. (2013), ‘Cicero and Roman identity’, in Steel, C. E. W. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero (Cambridge), 122–38.Google Scholar

Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds.) (2000), Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society (Cambridge, ma).Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (trans. A Bass) (1987), The Post Card (Chicago).Google Scholar

Dickey, E. (2002), Latin Forms of Address (Oxford).Google Scholar

Dickey, E. and Chahoud, A. (2010), Colloquial and Literary Latin (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Dover, K. J. (1978), Greek Homosexuality (Cambridge, ma).Google Scholar

Dubuisson, M. (1980), ‘‘Toi aussi mon fils!’’, Latomus, 39(4), 881–90.Google Scholar

Dubuisson, M. (1982), ‘Y a-t-il une politique linguistique romaine?’, Ktéma, 7, 187–216.Google Scholar

Dubuisson, M. (1986), ‘Purisme et politique: Suétone, Tibère et le grec au Sénat’, in Veremans, J., Decreus, F. and Deroux, C. (eds.), Hommages à Jozef Veremans (Brussels), 109–17.Google Scholar

Dubuisson, M. (1992), ‘Le grec à Rome à l’époque de Cicéron: extension et qualité du bilinguisme’, Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations, 47, 187–206.Google Scholar

Dubuisson, M. (2000), ‘Art de la voltige et “code-switching” (Apulée, “Métamorphoses” i,1, 5–6)’, Latomus, 59(3), 607–13.Google Scholar

Dubuisson, M. (2002), ‘Le grec d’Auguste: notes pour un réexamen’, in Defosse, P. (ed.), Hommages à Carl Deroux. II. Prose et linguistique, médecine (Brussels), 152–63.Google Scholar

Dubuisson, M. (2005), ‘Le grec de la correspondance de Cicéron: questions préliminaires sur un cas de bilinguisme’, La Linguistique, 41.2, 69–86.Google Scholar

Dubuisson, M. (2009), ‘Suétone et la question des langues’, in Dubuisson, M. and Poignault, R. (eds.), Présence de Suétone: actes du colloque tenu à Clermont-Ferrand, 25–27 novembre 2004: à Michel Dubuisson in memoriam (Tours), 31–41.Google Scholar

Dunkel, G. E. (2000), ‘Remarks on code-switching in Cicero’s letters to Atticus’, Museum Helveticum, 57, 122–9.Google Scholar

Eck, W (1992), ‘P. Aelius Apollonides, ab epistulis Graecis, und ein Brief des Cornelius Fronto’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 91, 236–42.Google Scholar

Eck, W (1998), ‘M. Cornelius Fronto, Lehrer Marc Aurels, consul suffectus im J. 142’, Rheinisches Museum, 141, 193–6.Google Scholar

Ehrle, F. (ed.), (1906), M. Cornelii Frontonis aliorumque reliquae quae codice Vaticano 5750 rescripto continentur (Milan).Google Scholar

Elder, O. (2014), ‘It’s better in Greek? Historical implications of the code-switching in Cicero’s letters’ (MSc dissertation, University of Oxford).Google Scholar

Elder, O. (2018), ‘Language and the politics of Roman identity’ (PhD thesis, University of Cambridge).Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (2009), ‘Caesar as an intellectual’, in Griffin, M. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar (Chichester), 141–56.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. (2016), Beyond Greek: The Beginnings of Latin Literature (Cambridge, ma/London).Google Scholar

Fisher, J. H. (1992), ‘A language policy for Lancastrian England’, Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 107, 1168–80.Google Scholar

Fleury, P. (2006), Lectures de Fronton: un rhéteur latin à l’époque de la Seconde Sophistique (Paris).Google Scholar

Fleury, P. (2012), ‘Marcus Aurelius’ letters’, in Van Ackeren, M. (ed.), A Companion to Marcus Aurelius (Oxford/Malden, ma), 62–76.Google Scholar

Fleury, P. and Demougin, S. (2003), Fronton: correspondance (Paris).Google Scholar

Flobert, P. (1988), ‘Lingua Latina et Lingua Romana: purisme, administration et invasions barbares’, Ktèma, 13, 205–12.Google Scholar

Freisenbruch, A. (2004), ‘The correspondence of Marcus Cornelius Fronto’ (PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge).Google Scholar

Freisenbruch, A. (2007), ‘Back to Fronto: doctor and patient in his correspondence with an emperor’, in Morello, R. and Morrison, A. D. (eds.), Ancient Letters: Classical and Late Antique Epistolography (Oxford), 235–56.Google Scholar

Gafaranga, J. (2009), ‘The conversation analytic model of code-switching’, in Bullock, B. E. and Toribio, A. J. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Code-Switching (Cambridge), 114–26.Google Scholar

Gardner-Chloros, P. (2009), Code-Switching (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Gardner-Chloros, P. (2014), ‘Bilinguality and bimodality: comparing linguistic and visual acculturation in artists’ letters and their works’, International Journal of Bilingualism, 18(2), 175–97.Google Scholar

Gardner-Chloros, P. and Weston, D. (2015), ‘Code-switching and multilingualism in literature’, Language and Literature, 24(3), 182–93.Google Scholar

Gelsomino, R. (1958), ‘I grecismi di Augusto. Atti e documenti publici’, Maia, 10, 148–56.Google Scholar

Gelsomino, R. (1959), ‘Il greco e i grecismi di Augusto la vita privata’, Maia, 11, 120–31.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. (2012), ‘On the nature of ancient letter collections’, Journal of Roman Studies, 102, 56–78.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. (2014), ‘Suetonius and the viri illustres of Pliny the Younger’, in Power, T. and Gibson, R. K. (eds.), Suetonius the Biographer: Studies in Roman Lives (Oxford), 199–230.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. and Morello, R. (2012), Reading the Letters of Pliny the Younger: An Introduction (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. and Morrison, A. D. (2007), ‘Introduction: what is a letter?’, in Morello, R. and Morrison, A. D. (eds.), Ancient Letters. Classical and Late Antique Epistolography (Oxford), 1–16.Google Scholar

Gildenhard, I. (2006), ‘Reckoning with tyranny: Greek thoughts on Caesar in Cicero’s letters to Atticus in early 49’, in Lewis, S. (ed.), Ancient Tyranny (Edinburgh), 197–209.Google Scholar

Gildenhard, I. (2018), ‘A Republic in letters: epistolary communities in Cicero’s correspondence, 49–44 bce’, in P. Ceccarelli, L. Doering, T. Fögen and I. Gildenhard (eds.), Letters and Communities: Studies in the Socio-Political Dimensions of Ancient Epistolography, 206–33 (Oxford).Google Scholar

Glare, P. G. W. (ed.) (2012), Oxford Latin Dictionary (2nd ed.) 2 vols. (Oxford).Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (2001), Being Greek Under Rome: Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic and the Development of Empire (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Gonzalès, A. (2003), Pline le Jeune: esclaves et affranchis à Rome (Paris).Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (2012), Horace: Satires Book I (Cambridge/New York).Google Scholar

Griffin, M. (1995), ‘Philosophical badinage in Cicero’s letters to his friends’, in Powell, J. G. F. (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher (Oxford), 325–46.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. (1997), ‘From Aristotle to Atticus: Cicero and Matius on friendship’, in Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. (eds.), Philosophia togata II: Plato and Aristotle at Rome (Oxford), 86–109.Google Scholar

Grube, G. M. A. (1959), ‘Theodorus of Gadara’, American Journal of Philology, 80(4), 337–65.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (1992), Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome (Ithaca, ny).Google Scholar

Gumperz, J. J. (1982), Discourse Strategies (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Gunn, J. A. W., Matthews, J., Schurman, D. and Wiebe, M. (eds.) (1982), Benjamin Disraeli Letters, vol. I: 1815–1834 (Toronto).Google Scholar

Haines, C. R. (1919), Fronto: Correspondence, vol. I (London/Cambridge, ma).Google Scholar

Haines, C. R. (1920), Fronto: Correspondence, vol. II (London/Cambridge, ma).Google Scholar

Hall, J. (1996), ‘Cicero Fam. 5.8 and Fam. 15.5 in the light of modern politeness theory’, Antichthon, 30, 19–33.Google Scholar

Hall, J. (2005), ‘Politeness and formality in Cicero’s letter to Matius’, Museum Helveticum, 62, 193–213.Google Scholar

Hall, J. (2009), Politeness and Politics in Cicero’s Letters (Oxford).Google Scholar

Hamers, J. F. and Blanc, M. H. A. (2000), Bilinguality and Bilingualism (2nd ed.) (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Hammond, M. (1987), The Iliad. A New Prose Translation (Harmondsworth).Google Scholar

Haugen, E. (1973), ‘Bilingualism, language contact, and immigrant languages in the United States: a research report, 1956–1970’, in Sebeok, T. (ed.), Current Trends in Linguistics (The Hague), 505–91.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (2002), Pliny’s Statue: The Letters, Self-Portraiture and Classical Art (Exeter).Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (2004), Morals and Villas in Seneca’s Letters (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (2007), ‘‘‘… when who should walk into the room but …”: epistoliterarity in Cicero, Ad Qfr. 3.1’, in Morello, R. and Morrison, A. D. (eds.), Ancient Letters: Classical and Late Antique Epistolography (Oxford), 37–85.Google Scholar

Hendrickson, G. L. (1906), ‘The De Analogia of Julius Caesar; its occasion, nature, and date, with additional fragments’, Classical Philology, 1(2), 97–120.Google Scholar

Henriksson, K.-E. (1956), Griechische Büchertitel in der römischen Literatur (Helsinki).Google Scholar

Herman, J. (trans. R. Wright) (2000), Vulgar Latin (University Park, pa).Google Scholar

Hess, N. (1996), ‘Code switching and style shifting as markers of liminality in literature’, Language and Literature, 5(1), 5–18.Google Scholar

Hoffer, S. E. (1999), The Anxieties of Pliny the Younger (New York).Google Scholar

Hoffer, S. E. (2007), ‘Cicero’s “stomach”: political indigestion and the use of repeated allusive expressions in Cicero’s correspondence’, in Morello, R. and Morrison, A. D. (eds.), Ancient Letters and Late Antique Epistolography (Oxford), 87–106.Google Scholar

Holford-Strevens, L. (1991), ‘The new Fronto’, Classical Review, 41, 76–80.Google Scholar

Holford-Strevens, L. (1993), ‘Utraque lingua doctus: some notes on bilingualism in the Roman Empire’, in Jocelyn, H. D. (ed.), Tria Lustra: Essays and Notes Presented to John Pinsent, Founder and Editor of the Liverpool Classical Monthly, by some of its Contributors on the Occasion of the 150th Issue (Liverpool), 203–13.Google Scholar

Holford-Strevens, L. (2000), ‘Fronto’, Classical Review, 50, 460–2.Google Scholar

Holford-Strevens, L. and Vardi, A. D. (2004), The Worlds of Aulus Gellius (Oxford).Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (1979), ‘Doctus sermones utriusque linguae?’, Échos du Monde Classique, 22, 79–95.Google Scholar

Horváth, A. (1996), ‘Griechische Zitate im ersten Jahrhundert der Kaiserzeit im Spiegel der Kaiserbiographien Suetons’, Acta Classica Universitatis Scientiarum Debreceniensis, 32, 71–83.Google Scholar

Housman, A. E. (1910), ‘Greek nouns in Latin poetry from Lucretius to Juvenal’, Journal of Philosophy, 31, 236–66.Google Scholar

Hout, van den, M. P. J. (1954), M. Cornelii Frontonis epistulae (Leiden).Google Scholar

Hout, van den, M. P. J. (1988), M. Cornelius Fronto: epistulae (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Hout, van den, M. P. J. (1999), A Commentary on the Letters of M. Cornelius Fronto (Leiden).Google Scholar

Howard, A. A. (1896), ‘Notes on Suetonius’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 7, 205–14.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. (1998), Cicero’s Correspondence: A Literary Study (Oxford).Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. (2013), Greek to Latin: Frameworks and Contexts for Intertextuality (Oxford/New York).Google Scholar

Ihm, M. (1907), C. Suetoni Tranquilli opera, vol. i: De vita Caesarum libri VIII. Editio maior (Leipzig).Google Scholar

International Journal of Bilingualism (2000), Special Issue, 4(2).Google Scholar

Jackson, J. (2014), ‘In utramque partem tum Graece tum Latine: Code-Switching and Cultured Identity in Cicero’s Letters to Atticus’ (MA thesis, University of Kansas).Google Scholar

Jocelyn, H. D. (1999), ‘Code-switching in the comoedia palliata’, in Vogt-Spira, G. and Rommel, B. (eds.), Rezeption und Identität. Die kulturelle Auseinandersetzung Roms mit Griechenland als europäisches Paradigma (Stuttgart), 169–95.Google Scholar

Jonsson, C. (2010), ‘Functions of code-switching in bilingual theater: an analysis of three Chicano plays’, Journal of Pragmatics, 42(5), 1296–310.Google Scholar

Kaimio, J. (1979), The Romans and the Greek Language (Helsinki).Google Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (1988), Guardians of Language: The Grammarian and Society in Late Antiquity (Berkeley, ca).Google Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (1992), Studies on the text of Suetonius De Grammaticis et Rhetoribus (Oxford).Google Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (1995), C. Suetonius Tranquillus: De Grammaticis et Rhetoribus, edited with introduction, translation and commentary (Oxford).Google Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (2014), ‘The transmission of Suetonius’s Caesars in the Middle Ages’, Transactions of the American Philological Association, 144, 135–88.Google Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (2016a), Lives of the Caesars & On Teachers of Grammar and Rhetoric (C. Suetoni Tranquilli De uita Caesarum libri VIII et De grammaticis et rhetoribus liber) (Oxford).Google Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (2016b), Studies on the Text of Suetonius’ De vita Caesarum (Oxford/New York).Google Scholar

Kellman, S. G. (2000), The Translingual Imagination (Lincoln, ne).Google Scholar

Kellman, S. G. (ed.), (2003), Switching Languages: Translingual Writers Reflect on their Craft (Lincoln, ne).Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. (1972), The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World 300 B.C.–A.D. 300 (Princeton).Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (1997), Friendship in the Classical World (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Laes, C. (2009), ‘What could Marcus Aurelius feel for Fronto?’, Studia Humaniora Tartuensia, 10, 1–7.Google Scholar

Langslow, D. R. (2007), ‘The epistula in ancient scientific and technical literature, with special reference to medicine’, in Morello, R. and Morrison, A. D. (eds.), Ancient Letters: Classical and Late Antique Epistolography (Oxford), 211–34.Google Scholar

Langslow, D. R. (2012), ‘Integration, identity, and language shift: strengths and weaknesses of the “linguistic” evidence’, in Roselaar, S. T. (ed.), Processes of Integration and Identity Formation in the Roman Republic (Leiden/Boston, ma), 289–309.Google Scholar

Laurand, L. (1936–8), Études sur le style des discours de Cicéron (3 vols.) (Paris).Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (1996), ‘Plinius-Studien VII: Cicero das unerreichbare Vorbild’, Gymnasium, 103, 333–53.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (2009), Vom Römertum zum Ästhetizismus: Studien zu den Briefen des jüngeren Plinius (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar

Liddell, H. G., Scott, R. and Jones, H. S. (1996) A Greek–English Lexicon (with a revised supplement) (Oxford).Google Scholar

Lindsay, H. (1994), ‘Suetonius as ab epistulis to Hadrian and the early history of the imperial correspondence’, Historia: Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte, 43, 454–68.Google Scholar

Lintott, A. W. (2008), Cicero as Evidence: A Historian’s Companion (Oxford).Google Scholar

Lipski, J. M. (1982), ‘Spanish–English language switching in speech and literature: theories and models’, The Bilingual Review, 9(3), 191–212.Google Scholar

Lowe, E. A. (1925), ‘Some facts about our oldest Latin manuscripts’, Classical Quarterly, 19(3–4), 197–208.Google Scholar

McClure, E. (1998), ‘The relationship between form and function in written national language – English code-switching: evidence from Mexico, Spain, and Bulgaria’, in Jacobson, R. (ed.), Codeswitching Worldwide (Berlin/New York), 125–50.Google Scholar

McClure, E. (2001), ‘Oral and written Assyrian-English codeswitching’, in Jacobson, R. (ed.), Codeswitching Worldwide II (Berlin/New York), 157–91.Google Scholar

McConnell, S. (2014), Philosophical Life in Cicero’s Letters (Cambridge).Google Scholar

McDonnell, M. (1996), ‘Writing, copying and autograph manuscripts in ancient Rome’, Classical Review, 46, 469–91.Google Scholar

Mai, A. (ed.), (1823), M. Cornelii Frontonis et M. Aurelii imperatoris epistulae. L. Veri et Antonini Pii et Appiani epistularum reliquiae. Fragmenta Frontonis et scripta grammatica. Editio prima Romana plus centum epistulis aucta ex codice rescripto Bibliothecae Pontificiae Vaticanae (Rome).Google Scholar

Mäkilähde, A. and Rissanen, V.-M. (2016), ‘Solidarity in Cicero’s letters: methodological considerations in analysing the functions of code-switching’, Pallas, 102, 237–45.Google Scholar

Malcovati, H. (1967), Imperatoris Caesaris Augusti operum fragmenta (4th ed.) (Turin).Google Scholar

Malherbe, A. J. (1988), Ancient Epistolary Theorists (Atlanta).Google Scholar

Marchesi, I. (2008), The Art of Pliny’s letters: A Poetics of Allusion in the Private Correspondence (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Méthy, N. (2007), Les lettres de Pline le Jeune: une représentation de l’homme (Paris).Google Scholar

Méthy, N. (2009), ‘Suétone vu par un contemporain: les débuts de l’historien dans la correspondance de Pline le Jeune’, Gerión, 27, 219–29.Google Scholar

Millar, F. (1977), The Emperor in the Roman World (31 BC–AD 337) (London).Google Scholar

Mommsen, T. (ed.) (1862–) Corpus inscriptionum latinarum (Berlin).Google Scholar

Montes-Alcalá, C. (2000), ‘Attitudes towards oral and written codeswitching in Spanish–English bilingual youths’, in Roca, A. (ed.), Research on Spanish in the US (Somerville, ma), 218–27.Google Scholar

Montes-Alcalá, C. (2001), ‘Written codeswitching: powerful bilingual images’, in Jacobson, R. (ed.), Codeswitching Worldwide II (Berlin), 195–219.Google Scholar

Montes-Alcalá, C. (2005), ‘“Dear Amigo”: exploring code-switching in personal letters’, in Sayahi, L. and Westmoreland, M. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics (Somerville, ma), 102–8.Google Scholar

Montes-Alcalá, C. (2012), ‘Code-switching in U.S. Latino novels’, in Sebba, M., Mahootian, S., and Jonsson, C. (eds.), Language Mixing and Code-Switching in Writing: Approaches to Mixed-Language Written Discourse (New York/Abingdon).Google Scholar

Montes-Alcalá, C. (2015), ‘Code-switching in US Latino literature: The role of biculturalism’, Language and Literature, 24(3), 264–81.Google Scholar

Morello, R. and Morrison, A. D. (2007), Ancient Letters: Classical and Late Antique Epistolography (Oxford).Google Scholar

Morgan, T. (1998), Literate Education in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Mullen, A. (2012), ‘Introduction. Multiple languages, multiple identities’, in Mullen, A. and James, P. (eds.), Multilingualism in the Graeco-Roman Worlds (Cambridge), 1–35.Google Scholar

Mullen, A. (2013a), Southern Gaul and the Mediterranean: Multilingualism and Multiple Identities in the Iron Age and Roman Periods (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Mullen, A. (2013b), ‘The language of the potteries: communication in the production and trade of Gallo-Roman terra sigillata’, in Fulford, M. and Durham, E. (eds.), Seeing Red: New Economic and Social Perspectives on Terra Sigillata (London), 97–110.Google Scholar

Mullen, A. (2013c), ‘The bilingualism of material culture? Thoughts from a linguistic perspective’, Journal on Hellenistic and Roman Material Culture, 2, 21–43.Google Scholar

Mullen, A. (2015), ‘“In both our languages”: Greek–Latin code-switching in Roman literature’, Language and Literature, 24(3), 213–32.Google Scholar

Mullen, A. and James, P. (eds.) (2012), Multilingualism in the Graeco-Roman Worlds (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Muysken, P. (2000), Bilingual Speech: A Typology of Code-Mixing (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, C. (1993), Duelling Languages: Grammatical Structure in Codeswitching (Oxford).Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, C. (2002), Contact Linguistics: Bilingual Encounters and Grammatical Outcomes (Oxford).Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, C. (2006), Multiple Voices: An Introduction to Bilingualism (Malden, ma).Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, C. and Jake, J. (2009), ‘A universal model of code-switching and bilingual language processing and production’, in Bullock, B. E. and Toribio, A. J. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Code-Switching (Cambridge), 336–57.Google Scholar

Naber, S. A. (1867), M. Cornelii Frontonis et M. Aurelii imperatoris epistulae. L. Veri et T. Antonini Pii et Appiani epistularum reliquiae (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Naifeh, S. and White Smith, G. (2011), Van Gogh: The Life (London).Google Scholar

Nicholson, J. (1988), ‘The survival of Cicero’s letters’, Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History, 9, 63–105.Google Scholar

Nicholson, J. (1994), ‘The delivery and confidentiality of Cicero’s letters’, Classical Journal, 90, 33–63.Google Scholar

Nurmi, A. and Pahta, P. (2004), ‘Social stratification and patterns of code-switching in early English letters’, Multilingua, 4, 417–56.Google Scholar

Nurmi, A. and Pahta, P. (2012), ‘Multilingual practices in women’s English correspondence 1400–1800’, in Sebba, M., Mahootian, S. and Jonsson, C. (eds.), Language Mixing and Code-Switching in Writing: Approaches to Mixed-Language Written Discourse (New York/London), 44–67.Google Scholar

Oksala, P. (1953), Die griechischen Lehnwörter in den Prosaschriften Ciceros (Helsinki).Google Scholar

Omole, J. O. (1998), ‘Code-switching in Soyinka’s The Interpreters’, in Epstein, E. L. and Kole, R. (eds.), The Language of African Literature (Trenton, nj and Asmara), 57–72.Google Scholar

Osborne, R. (2012), ‘Cultures as languages and languages as cultures’, in Mullen, A. and James, P. (eds.), Multilingualism in the Graeco-Roman Worlds (Cambridge), 317–34.Google Scholar

O’Sullivan, N. (2017), ‘Cicero’s Greek and the New Testament’, in Minchin, E. and Jackson, H. (eds.), Text and the Material World: Essays in Honour of Graeme Clarke (Uppsala), 91–101.Google Scholar

O’Sullivan, N. (2019), ‘Manuscript evidence for alphabet-switching in the works of Cicero: common nouns and adjectives’, CQ, 68.2, 498–516.Google Scholar

Pavlenko, A. (2014), The Bilingual Mind and What It Tells Us about Language and Thought (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Pearsall, D. (1994), ‘Hoccleve’s Regiment of Princes: the poetics of royal self-representation’, Speculum, 69, 386–410.Google Scholar

Pelttari, A. (2011), ‘Approaches to the writing of Greek in late antique Latin texts’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 51, 461–82.Google Scholar

Pembroke, H. H. (1942), The Pembroke Papers (1734–1780): Letters and Diaries of Henry, Tenth Earl of Pembroke and His Circle (London).Google Scholar

Peppard, M. (2008), ‘A letter between two women, with a courier about to depart’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 167, 162–6.Google Scholar

Petersmann, H. (1999), ‘The language of early Roman satire: its function and characteristics’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 93, 289–310.Google Scholar

Pezzini, G. (2018), ‘The early Lucilius and the language of the Roman palliata’, in B. W. Breed, E. Keitel, and R. Wallace (eds.), Lucilius and Satire in Second-Century bc Rome (Cambridge), 162–83.Google Scholar

Pfaff, C. W. (1979), ‘Constraints on language mixing: intrasentential code-switching and borrowing in Spanish/English’, Language, 55(2), 291–318.Google Scholar

Pflaum, H.-G. (1964), ‘Les correspondants de l’orateur M. Cornelius Fronto de Cirta’, in Renard, M. and Schilling, R. (eds.), Hommages à Jean Bayet (Brussels), 544–60.Google Scholar

Pharand, M. W., Hawman, E. L., Millar, M. S., den Otten, S. and Wiebe, M. G. (eds.) (2013), Benjamin Disraeli Letters, vol. IX: 1865–1867 (Toronto).Google Scholar

Poplack, S. (1980), ‘Sometimes I’ll start a sentence in Spanish Y TERMINO EN ESPAÑOL: toward a typology of code-switching’, Linguistics, 18(7–8), 581–618.Google Scholar

Poster, C. (2007), ‘A conversation halved: epistolary theory in Greco-Roman antiquity’, in Poster, C. and Mitchell, L. C. (eds.), Letter-Writing Manuals and Instruction from Antiquity to the Present (Columbia, sc), 21–51.Google Scholar

Powell, J. G. F. (1990), ‘Augustus and the Muses (Suetonius, Tiberius 21.4)’, Classical Quarterly, 40(2), 579–80.Google Scholar

Powell, J. G. F. (ed.) (1995), Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers (Oxford).Google Scholar

Power, T. J. (2010), ‘Pliny, Letters 5.10 and the literary career of Suetonius’, Journal of Roman Studies, 100, 140–62.Google Scholar

Power, T. J. (2014), ‘The originality of Suetonius’, in Power, T. and Gibson, R. K. (eds.), Suetonius the Biographer. Studies in Roman Lives (Oxford), 1–18.Google Scholar

Preud’homme, L. (1903–4), ‘Troisième étude sur l’histoire du texte de Suétone, de vita Caesarum’, Mémoires couronnés et autres mémoires publiés par L’Académie royale des sciences, des lettres et des beaux-arts de Belgique, 63, 3–94.Google Scholar

Rawson, B. (1978), The Politics of Friendship: Pompey and Cicero (Sydney).Google Scholar

Rawson, E. (1983), Cicero: A Portrait (rev. ed.) (Bristol).Google Scholar

Rawson, E. (1985), Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic (London).Google Scholar

Reynolds, L. D. (1983), Texts and Transmission: A Survey of the Latin Classics (Oxford).Google Scholar

Reynolds, L. D. and Wilson, N. G. (2013), Scribes and Scholars: A Guide to the Transmission of Greek and Latin Literature (4th ed.) (Oxford).Google Scholar

Richardson, M. (1980), ‘Henry V, the English Chancery, and Chancery English’, Speculum, 55(4), 726–50.Google Scholar

Richlin, A. (1992), The Garden of Priapus: Sexuality and Aggression in Roman Humor (Oxford).Google Scholar

Richlin, A. (2006a), ‘Fronto + Marcus: love, friendship, letters’, in Kuefler, M. (ed.), The Boswell Thesis: Essays on Christianity, Social Tolerance, and Homosexuality (Chicago), 111–29.Google Scholar

Richlin, A. (2006b), Marcus Aurelius in Love (Chicago).Google Scholar

Richlin, A. (2011), ‘Parallel lives: Domitia Lucilla and Cratia, Fronto and Marcus’, Eugesta, 1, 163–203.Google Scholar

Riggsby, A. M. (2003), ‘Pliny in space (and time)’, Arethusa, 36, 167–86.Google Scholar

Rochette, B. (1997), Le latin dans le monde grec: recherches sur la diffusion de la langue et des lettres latines dans les provinces hellénophones de l’Empire romain (Brussels).Google Scholar

Rochette, B. (2007), ‘Code-switching chez Ausone’, in Bedon, R. and Polfer, M. (eds.), Être Romain. Hommages in memoriam Charles Marie Ternes (Remshalden), 175–95.Google Scholar

Rochette, B. (2010), ‘Greek and Latin bilingualism’, in Bakker, E. J. (ed.), A Companion to the Greek Language (Malden, ma/Oxford), 281–93.Google Scholar

Rochette, B. (2013), ‘Traces du bilinguisme dans la correspondance de Pline le Jeune’, in Garcea, A., Lhommé, M.-K., and Vallat, D. (eds.), Polyphonia Romana. Hommages à Frédérique Biville, vol. I (Hildesheim/Zurich/New York), 469–81.Google Scholar

Rochette, B. (2015), ‘Suétone et le bilinguisme des Julio-Claudiens’, in Devillers, O. (ed.), Autour de Pline le Jeune: en hommage à Nicole Méthy (Bordeaux), 155–68.Google Scholar

Roesch, S. (2004), ‘La politesse dans la correspondance du Cicéron’, in Nadjo, L. and Gavoille, E. (eds.), Epistulae antiquae III: actes du IIIe Colloque international “L’épistolaire antique et ses prolongements européens” (Université François-Rabelais, Tours, 25–27 septembre 2002) (Louvain), 139–52.Google Scholar

Rolfe, J. C. (1914a), Suetonius, vol. I (Cambridge, ma).Google Scholar

Rolfe, J. C. (1914b), Suetonius, vol. II (Cambridge, ma).Google Scholar

Rolfe, J. C. (1998a), Suetonius, vol. i, Revised and with a New Introduction (Cambridge, ma).Google Scholar

Rolfe, J. C. (1998b), Suetonius, vol. ii, Revised (Cambridge, ma).Google Scholar

Rollinger, C. (2015), ‘Bilingualität, Codewechsel und Zitate im Briefverkehr Ciceros und der spätrepublikanischen Oberschicht’, Gymnasium, 122 (2), 133–54.Google Scholar

Rollo, A. ‘Notes on Suetonius’ Graeca’, CQ, 68.2, 612–20.Google Scholar

Romaine, S. (1995), Bilingualism (2nd ed.) (Oxford).Google Scholar

Rose, H. J. (1921), ‘The Greek of Cicero’, Journal of Hellenic Studies, 41, 91–116.Google Scholar

Roth, K. L. (1858), C. Suetoni Tranquilli quae supersunt omnia (Lepizig).Google Scholar

Rothwell, W. (1994), ‘The trilingual England of Geoffrey Chaucer’, Studies in the Age of Chaucer, 16, 45–67.Google Scholar

Rutherford, R. B. (1989), The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius: A Study (Oxford).Google Scholar

Saller, R. P. (1982), Personal Patronage Under the Early Empire (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Sankoff, D., Poplack, S. and Vanniarajan, S. (1990), ‘The case of the nonce loan in Tamil’, Language Variation and Change, 2(1), 71–101.Google Scholar

Schendl, H. (2000), ‘Linguistic aspects of code-switching in medieval English texts’, in Trotter, D. A. (ed.), Multilingualism in Later Medieval Britain (Cambridge), 77–92.Google Scholar

Schendl, H. (2013), ‘Multilingualism and code-switching as mechanisms of contact-induced lexical change in Middle English’, in Schreier, D. and Hundt, M. (eds), English as a Contact Language (Cambridge), 41–57.Google Scholar

Schendl, H. and Wright, L. (eds.) (2011), Code-Switching in Early English (Berlin).Google Scholar

Schenk, P. (2016), ‘Forms of intertextuality in Pliny’s Epistles’, in Gibson, R. K. and Whitton, C. L. (eds.), The Epistles of Pliny. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies (Oxford), 332–54.Google Scholar

Sebba, M. (2012), ‘Multilingualism in written discourse: an approach to the analysis of multilingual texts’, International Journal of Bilingualism, 17(1), 97–118.Google Scholar

Sebba, M., Mahootian, S. and Jonsson, C. (eds.) (2012), Language Mixing and Code-Switching in Writing: Approaches to Mixed-Language Written Discourse (New York/Abingdon).Google Scholar

Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1962), ‘L.S.J. and Cicero’s letters’, Classical Quarterly, 12 (159–65).Google Scholar

Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1963), ‘L.S.J. and Cicero’s letters’, Classical Quarterly, 13, 88.Google Scholar

Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1965–70), Cicero’s Letters to Atticus (7 vols.) (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1977), Cicero, epistulae ad Familiares (2 vols.) (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1980), Cicero, Epistulae ad Quintum fratrem et M. Brutum (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1999), Cicero, Letters to Atticus (4 vols.) (Cambridge, ma).Google Scholar

Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (2001), Cicero, Letters to Friends (3 vols.) (Cambridge, ma).Google Scholar

Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (2002), Letters to Quintus and Brutus. Letter Fragments. Letter to Octavian. Invectives. Handbook of Electioneering (Cambridge, ma).Google Scholar

Sherk, R. K. (1969), Roman Documents of the Greek East (Baltimore).Google Scholar

Sherwin-White, A. N. (1966), The Letters of Pliny: A Historical and Social Commentary (Oxford).Google Scholar

Shipp, G. P. (1955), ‘Plautine terms for Greek and Roman things’, Glotta, 34, 139–52.Google Scholar

Smith, Z. (2000), White Teeth (London).Google Scholar

Steele, R. B. (1900), ‘The Greek in Cicero’s Epistles’, American Journal of Philology, 21(4), 387–410.Google Scholar

Stowers, S. K. (1986), Letter Writing in Greco-Roman Antiquity (Philadelphia).Google Scholar

Swain, S. (1996), Hellenism and Empire: Language, Classicism, and Power in the Greek World, AD 50–250 (Oxford).Google Scholar

Swain, S. (2002), ‘Bilingualism in Cicero? The evidence of code-switching’, in Adams, J. N., Swain, S. and Janse, M. (eds.), Bilingualism in Ancient Society. Language Contact and the Written Text (Oxford), 128–67.Google Scholar

Swain, S. (2004), ‘Bilingualism and biculturalism in Antonine Rome. Apuleius, Fronto, and Gellius’, in Holford-Strevens, L and Vardi, A. D. (eds.), The Worlds of Aulus Gellius (Oxford), 3–40.Google Scholar

Taillardat, J. (1967), Suétone: Peri blasphemion, peri paidion (extraits byzantins) (Paris).Google Scholar

Thomas, E. (2007), Monumentality and the Roman Empire. Architecture in the Antonine Age (Oxford).Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (2008), ‘David Roy Shackleton Bailey 1917–2005’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 153, 3–21.Google Scholar

Townend, G. B. (1959), ‘The date of composition of Suetonius’ Caesares’, CQ, 9, 285–93.Google Scholar

Townend, G. B. (1960), ‘The sources of the Greek in Suetonius’, Hermes, 88(1), 98–120.Google Scholar

Trapp, M. (1990), ‘Plato’s Phaedrus in second-century Greek literature’, in Russell, D. A. (ed.), Antonine Literature (Oxford), 141–73.Google Scholar

Trapp, M. (2003), Greek and Latin Letters: An Anthology with Translation (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Trapp, M. (2006), ‘Biography in letters; biography and letters’, in McGing, B. and Mossman, J. (eds.), The Limits of Ancient Biography (Swansea), 335–50.Google Scholar

Turville-Petre, T. (1996), England the Nation: Language, Literature, and National Identity, 1290–1340 (Oxford).Google Scholar

Tyrrell, R. Y. and Purser, L. C. (1904), The Correspondence of M. Tullius Cicero: Arranged According to its Chronological Order (3rd ed.) (Dublin/London).Google Scholar

Uden, J. (2011), ‘Codeswitches in Caesar and Catullus’, Antichthon, 45, 113–30.Google Scholar

Valdés-Fallis, G. (1977), ‘The sociolinguistics of Chicano literature: towards an analysis of the role and function of language alternation in contemporary bilingual poetry’, Point of Contact, 1(4), 30–9.Google Scholar

Valette, E. (2014), ‘“Le vêtement bigarré des danseurs de pyrrhique”: pratiques du bilinguisme dans la correspondance de Fronton et Marc Aurèle’, in Mestre, F. and Gómez, P. (eds.), Three Centuries of Greek Culture Under the Roman Empire: homo Romanus Graeca oratione (Barcelona), 101–23.Google Scholar

Verboven, K. (2011), ‘Friendship among the Romans’, in Peachin, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Social Relations in the Roman World (Oxford), 404–21.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1983), Suetonius: The Scholar and his Caesars (London).Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. (2008), Rome’s Cultural Revolution (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Wardhaugh, R. (1998), An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (3rd ed.) (Malden/Oxford).Google Scholar

Wardle, D. S. (1992), ‘Cluvius Rufus and Suetonius’, Hermes, 120(4), 466–82.Google Scholar

Wardle, D. S. (1993), ‘Did Suetonius write in Greek?’, Acta Classica, 36, 91–103.Google Scholar

Wardle, D. S. (2002), ‘Suetonius as ab epistulis’, Historia: Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte, 51, 462–80.Google Scholar

Wardle, D. S. (2014), Suetonius: Life of Augustus (Oxford).Google Scholar

Weinreich, U. (1953), Languages in Contact. Findings and Problems (8th ed.) (New York).Google Scholar

Welch, K. E. (1996), ‘T. Pomponius Atticus: a banker in politics?’, Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte, 45, 450–71.Google Scholar

Wenskus, O. (1993), ‘Zitatzwang als Motiv für Codewechsel in der lateinischen Prosa’, Glotta, 71, 205–16.Google Scholar

Wenskus, O. (1995), ‘Triggering und Einschaltung griechischer Formen in lateinischer Prosa’, Indogermanische Forschungen, 100, 172–92.Google Scholar

Wenskus, O. (1996), ‘Markieren der Basissprache in lateinischen Texten mit griechischen Einschaltungen und Entlehnungen’, Indogermanische Forschungen, 101, 233–57.Google Scholar

Wenskus, O. (1998), Emblematischer Codewechsel und Verwandtes in der lateinischen Prosa. Zwischen Nähesprache und Distanzsprache (Innsbruck).Google Scholar

Wenskus, O. (2001), ‘Wie schreibt man einer Dame?’, Wiener Studien, 114, 215–32.Google Scholar

Wenskus, O. (2003), ‘Codewechsel bei Marc Aurel’, in Zybatow, L. N. (ed.), Europa der Sprachen: Sprachkompetenz, Mehrsprachigkeit, Translation (Frankfurt), 305–15.Google Scholar

White, P. (2003), ‘Tactics in Caesar’s correspondence with Cicero’, in Cairns, F. and Fantham, E. (eds.), Caesar against liberty?: Perspectives on his Autocracy (Cambridge), 68–95.Google Scholar

White, P. (2010), Cicero in Letters: Epistolary Relations of the Late Republic (Oxford).Google Scholar

Whitehorne, J. (1977), ‘Was Marcus Aurelius a hypochondriac?’, Latomus, 36, 413–21.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T. (2001), Greek Literature and the Roman Empire. The Politics of Imitation (Oxford).Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T. (2013), Beyond the Second Sophistic: Adventures in Greek Postclassicism (Berkeley, ca/London).Google Scholar

Whitton, C. (2013), Pliny the Younger: Epistles Book II (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Wiebe, M. B. and Conacher, J. B. (eds.) (1987), Benjamin Disraeli Letters. Vol. iii: 1838–1841 (Toronto).Google Scholar

Wilcox, A. (2005), ‘Paternal grief and the public eye: Cicero Ad Familiares 4.6’, Phoenix, 59, 267–87.Google Scholar

Wilcox, A. (2012), The Gift of Correspondence in Classical Rome: Friendship in Cicero’s Ad Familiares and Seneca’s Moral Epistles (Madison, wi).Google Scholar

Williams, C. A. (2012), Reading Roman Friendship (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Winsbury, R. (2014), Pliny the Younger: A Life in Roman Letters (London/New York).Google Scholar

Winter, W. (1989), ‘Markedness and naturalness’, in O. M. Tomić (ed.), Markedness in Synchrony and Diachrony (Berlin), 103–9.Google Scholar

Wogan-Browne, J. (ed.) (2009), Language and Culture in Medieval Britain: The French of England, c.1100–c.1500 (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Wolff, E. (2003), Pline le Jeune, ou le refus du pessimisme (Rennes).Google Scholar

Wordsworth, C. (1883), Conjectural Emendations of Passages in Ancient Authors, with Other Papers (London).Google Scholar

Zadorojnyi, A. (2011), ‘Transcripts of dissent? Political graffiti and elite ideology under the Principate’, in J. A. Baird and C. Taylor (eds.), Ancient Graffiti in Context (London/New York), 110–33.Google Scholar

Zentella, A. C. (1997), Growing up Bilingual (Oxford/Malden, ma).Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. E. G. (1980), ‘The subscriptions in the manuscripts of Livy and Fronto and the meaning of emendatio’, Classical Philology, 75(1), 38–59.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. E. G. (2000), ‘Review of van den Hout, M. P. J. 1999: a commentary on the letters of M. Cornelius Fronto, Leiden’, Bryn Mawr Classical Review, 2000.07.26.Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive