Abbott, Kenneth W. and Duncan, Snidal 2000, “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance,” International Organization 54(3): 421–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth W., Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew, Slaughter, Anne-Marie and Duncan, Snidal 2000, “The Concept of Legalization,” International Organization 54(3): 401– 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abel, Theodore 1948, “The Operation Called Verstehen,” American Journal of Sociology 54(3): 211–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Abromeit, Heidrun 1992, Der verkappte Einheitstaat, Opladen, Leske + Budrich

Abromeit, Heidrun and Schmidt, Thomas 1998, “Grenzprobleme der Demokratie. Konzeptionelle Überlegungen,” in Kohler-Koch, Beate (ed.), Regieren in entgrenzten Räumen (PVS Sonderheft 29), Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 293–320

Adamantopoulos, Konstantinos A. 1988, Das Subventionsrecht des GATT in der EWG, Köln, Heymanns

Alter, Karen J. 1998, “Who Are the ‘Masters of the Treaty’? European Governments and the European Court of Justice,” International Organization 52(1): 121–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Karen J. 2000, “The European Union's Legal System and Domestic Policy: Spillover or Backlash,” International Organization 54(3): 489–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Karen J. 2001, Establishing the Supremacy of European Law. The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe, Oxford University Press

Alter, Karen J. and Sophie, Meunier-Aitsahalia 1994, “Judical Politics in the European Community. European Integration and the Path-Breaking Cassis de Dijon Decision,” Comparative Political Studies 26(4): 535–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Jeffrey J. 1995, “Structural Funds and the Social Dimension of EU Policy: Springboard or Stumbling Block?” in Leibfried, Stephan and Pierson, Paul (eds.), European Social Policy. Between Fragmentation and Integration, Washington, DC, Brookings Institution, 123–58

Applebaum, Richard, Felstiner, William and Gessner, Volkmar (eds.) 2001, Rules and Networks ∔ The Legal Culture of Global Business Transactions, Oxford, Hart

Arbeiterkammer Bremen 1998. Ländervergleich der Betriebsprüfung und Steuerfahndung. Ergebnisse der Untersuchung aus unveröffentlichten Steuerstatistiken, Arbeiterkammer Bremen, unpublished paper (on file with the author)

Arend, Anthony Clark 1996, “Toward an Understanding of International Legal Rules,” in Beck, Robert J., Arend, Anthony Clark and Vander Lugt, Robert D. (eds.), International Rules. Approaches from International Law and International Relations, Oxford University Press, 289–310

Arendt, Hannah 1961, Between Past and Future, New York, Viking Press

Armstrong, Kenneth A. 1998, “Legal Integration: Theorizing the Legal Dimension of European Integration,” Journal of Common Market Studies 36(2): 155–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aspinwall, Mark and Greenwood, Justin 1998, “Conceptualizing Collective Action in the European Union. An Introduction,” in Aspinwall, Mark and Greenwood, Justin (eds.), Collective Action in the European Union. Interests and the New Politics of Associability, London, Routledge, 1–30

Avery, Natalie, Drake, Martine and Lang, Tim 1993, “Internationale Harmonisierung lebensmittelrechtlicher Normen. Eine Studie über die Codex Alimentarius Kommission,” EPD Entwicklungspolitik, Materialien II/93

Axelrod, Robert 1984, The Evolution of Cooperation, New York, Basic Books

Axelrod, Robert and Keohane, Robert O. 1986, “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions,” in Oye, Kenneth A. (ed.), Cooperation under Anarchy, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 226–54

Backes, Peter 1995, “Die neuen Streitbeilegungsregeln der Welthandelsorganisation (WTO). Zu den Auswirkungen im nationalen Recht der USA,” Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft 41(11): 917–19Google Scholar

Baker, Betsy 1992, “Eliciting Non-Party Compliance with Multilateral Environmental Treaties: U.S. Legislation and the Jurisdictional Bases for Compliance Incentives in the Montreal Ozone Protocol,” German Yearbook of International Law 35, 333–65Google Scholar

Becker, Peter 1977, “Politikverflechtung in der Gemeinschaftsaufgabe ‘Verbesserung der regionalen Wirtschaftsstruktur’,” in Scharpf, Fritz W., Reissert, Bernd and Schnabel, Fritz (eds.), Politikverflechtung II. Kritik und Berichte aus der Praxis, Kronberg/Ts, Hain, 29–38

Benz, Arthur and Burkard, Eberlein 1999, “The Europeanization of Regional Policies: Patterns of Multi-Level Governance,” Journal of European Public Policy 6(2): 329–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernauer, Thomas 2000a, “Solving Conflicts of Interest among Governments, Consumers, and Producers I,” Swiss Political Science Review 6(2): 79–99Google Scholar

Bernauer, Thomas 2000b, “Solving Conflicts of Interest among Governments, Consumers, and Producers II,” Swiss Political Science Review 6(3): 85–127Google Scholar

Bilal, Sanoussi and Polmans, Roel 1999, “Is State Aid in Decline? Trends of State Aid to Industry in the Member States of the European Union,” in Bilal, Sanoussi and Nicolaides, Phedon (eds.), Understanding State Aid Policy in the European Community. Perspectives on Rules and Practice, Maastricht, European Institute of Public Administration, 47–80

Black, Julia 1996, “Constitutionalising Self-Regulation,” Modern Law Review 59(1): 24–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bleckmann, Albert 1977, “Die Beihilfenkompetenz der Europäischen Gemeinschaften. Ein Beitrag zum Prinzip der begrenzten Ermächtigung,” Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 30(17): 615–19Google Scholar

Bleckmann, Albert 1984, “Ordnungsrahmen für das Recht der Subventionen. Gutachten D für den 55. Deutschen Juristentag,” Verhandlungen des Deutschen Juristentags 55(1): D1–D115Google Scholar

Bliss, Julia Christine 1987, “GATT Dispute Settlement Reform in the Uruguay Round: Problems and Prospects,” Stanford Journal of International Law 23(1): 31–55Google Scholar

Böckenförde, Ernst 1969, “Entstehung und Wandel des Rechtsstaatsbegriffs,” in Ehmke, Horst (ed.), Festschrift für Adolf Arndt, Frankfurt/M, Europäische Verlagsanstalt, 53–76

Bogdandy, Armin von 1999, Supranationaler Föderalismus als Wirklichkeit und Idee einer neuen Herrschaftsform. Zur Gestalt der Europäischen Union nach Amsterdam, Baden-Baden, Nomos

Böhret, Carl, Jann, Werner and Kronenwett, Eva 1980, “Handlungsspielräume und Steuerungspotential der regionalen Wirtschaftsförderung,” in Bruder, Wolfgang and Ellwein, Thomas (eds.), Raumordnung und staatliche Steuerungsfähigkeit (PVS-Sonderheft 10/1979), Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 76–110

Börzel, Tanja A. 1999, Why There Is No Southern Problem: On Environmental Leaders and Laggards in the European Union, EUI Working Paper, RSC 99/16, Florence, European University Institute

Börzel, Tanja 2000, Private Actors on the Rise? The Role of Non-State Actors in Compliance with International Institutions, Bonn, Max-Planck-Projektgruppe on Common Goods

Börzel, Tanja 2001, “Non-Compliance in the European Union,” Journal of European Public Policy 8(5): 803–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Börzel, Tanja 2002, “Non-State Actors and the Provision of Common Goods. Compliance with International Institutions,” in Hértier, Adrienne (ed.), Common Goods: Reinventing European and International Governance, Lanham, MD, Rowman & Littlefield, 155–78

Boss, Alfred and Rosenschon, Astrid 1998, Subventionen in Deutschland, Kieler Diskussionsbeiträge 320, Kiel, Institut für Weltwirtschaft

Boss, Alfred and Rosenschon, Astrid 2000, Subventionen in Deutschland: eine Aktualisierung, Kieler Diskussionsbeiträge 356, Kiel, Institut für Weltwirtschaft

Boss, Alfred and Rosenschon, Astrid 2002, Subventionen in Deutschland: Quantifizierung und finanzpolitische Bewertung, Kieler Diskussionsbeiträge 392/393, Kiel, Institut für Weltwirtschaft

Bothe, Michael 1996, “The Evaluation of Enforcement Mechanisms in International Environmental Law,” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Enforcing Environmental Standards: Economic Mechanisms as Viable Means?, Berlin, Springer, 13–38

Boyle, Alan E. 1991, “Saving the World? Implementation and Enforcement of International Law Through International Institutions,” Journal of Environmental Law 3(2): 229–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Break, George 1985, “The Tax Expenditure Budget. The Need for a Fuller Accounting,” National Tax Journal 38(3): 261–65Google Scholar

Breuel, Birgit 1988, “Was geschieht zur Subventionsprävention? Niedersächsische Gesetzesinitiativen im Bundesrat,” MIT-Jahrbuch 1988, 43–6

Brösse, Ulrich 1999, Industriepolitik, München, Oldenbourg

Brüggemeier, Gert and Joerges, Christian (eds.) 1984, Workshop zu Konzepten des post-interventionistischen Rechts, Zentrum für Europäische Rechtspolitik, Materialien 4, Bremen, Zentrum für Europäische Rechtspolitik

Bull, Hans Peter 1999, “Finanzausgleich im ‘Wettbewerbsstaat’ – Bemerkungen zur neuen Föderalismustheorie und zu ihrer Bedeutung für den Länderfinanzausgleich,” Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 52(7): 269–81Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley 1977, The Anarchical Society. A Study of Order in World Politics, Basingstoke, Macmillan

Burley, Anne-Marie and Walter, Mattli 1993, “Europe before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration,” International Organization 47(1): 41–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Busch, Marc L. and Reinhardt, Eric 2002, “Testing International Trade Law: Empirical Studies of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement,” in Kennedy, Daniel L. M. and Southwick, James D. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec, New York, Cambridge University Press, 457–81

Caldeira, Gregory A. and Gibson, James L. 1995, “The Legitimacy of the Court of Justice in the European Union: Models of Institutional Support,” American Political Science Review 89(2): 356–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, James 1996, “Compliance, Citizens, and NGOs,” in Cameron, James, Werksman, Jacob and Roderick, Peter (eds.), Improving Compliance with International Environmental Law, London, Earthscan Publications, 29–42

Cameron, James and Campbell, Karen (eds.) 1998, Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organisation, London, Cameron May

Cameron, James, Werksman, Jacob and Roderick, Peter (eds.) 1996, Improving Compliance with International Environmental Law, London, Earthscan Publications

Caporaso, James A. 1996, “The European Union and Forms of State: Westphalian, Regulatory or Post-Modern,” Journal of Common Market Studies 34(1): 29–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caporaso, James 1997, “Does the European Union Represent an N of 1?,” ECSA Review 10(3): 1–5Google Scholar

Caporaso, James A. 2000, “Changes in the Westphalian Order: Territory, Public Authority, and Sovereignty,” International Studies Review 2(2): 1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chalmers, Damien 2003, “‘Food for Thought’: Reconciling European Risks and National Habits,” Modern Law Review 66(4): 532–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I. 1997, “Third Party Dispute Settlement and International Law,” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 36(1): 65–89Google Scholar

Chayes, Abram and Chayes, Antonia Handler 1990, “From Law Enforcement to Dispute Settlement,” International Security 14(2): 147–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chayes, Abram and Chayes, Antonia Handler 1993, “On Compliance,” International Organization 47(2): 175–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chayes, Abram and Chayes, Antonia Handler 1995, The New Sovereignty. Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press

Checkel, Jeffrey T. 1998, “The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory. A Review Essay,” World Politics 50(1): 328–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2001, “Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change,” International Organization 55(3): 553–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christoforou, Theofanis 2003, “The Precautionary Principle and Democratizing Expertise: A European Legal Perspective,” Science and Public Policy 30(3): 205–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Classen, Claus Dieter 1997, “Anmerkung zu EuGH, Rs. C24/95, Urteil vom 20.3.1997,” Juristenzeitung 52(14): 724–6Google Scholar

Cowles, Maria Green, Caporaso, James A. and Risse, Thomas (eds.) 2001, Transforming Europe. Europeanization and Domestic Change, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press

Cummins, Jason G., Harris, Trevor S. and Hassett, Kevin A. 1995, “Accounting Standards, Information Flow, and Firm Investment Behavior,” in Feldstein, Martin, Hines, James R. and Hubbard, R. Glenn (eds.), The Effects of Taxation on Multinational Corporations, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 181–224

Curran, Vivian G. 2003, “Formalism and Anti-Formalism Traditions in French and German Judicial Methodology,” in Joerges, Christian and Ghaleigh, Navraj S. (eds.), Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and its Legal Traditions, Oxford, Hart, 205–28

Curtis, Craig, Thurman, Quint C. and Nice, David C. 1991, “Improving Legal Compliance by Noncoercive Means: Coproducing Order in Washington State,” Social Science Quarterly 72(4): 645–60Google Scholar

Datta, Lois-Ellin and Grasso, Patrick G. (eds.) 1998, Evaluating Tax Expenditures: Tools and Techniques for Assessing Outcomes, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass

De Schutter, Olivier, Lebessis, Notis and Paterson, John (eds.) 2001, Governance in the European Union, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications

Deutsche, Bundesbank 2000, “Die Entwicklung der Subventionen in Deutschland seit Beginn der neunziger Jahre,” Monatsbericht <Deutsche Bundesbank> 52(12): 15–29Google Scholar

Deutscher Bundestag (ed.) 1982, Fragen der Subventionspolitik, “Zur Sache”–Themen parlamentarischer Beratung 3/82, Bonn, Deutscher Bundestag

Di Fabio, Udo 1996, “Gefahr, Vorsorge, Risiko: Die Gefahrenabwehr unter dem Einfluß des Vorsorgeprinzips,” Jura 18(11): 566–74Google Scholar

Doering, Thomas 2003, “German Public Banks Under the Pressure of the EU Subsidy Proceedings,” Intereconomics 38(2): 94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downs, George W., Rocke, David M. and Barsoom, Peter N. 1996, “Is the Good News About Compliance Good News About Cooperation?,” International Organization 50(3): 379–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dryzek, John S. 1990, Discursive Democracy, Cambridge University Press

Dryzek, John S. 1999, “Transnational Democracy,” Journal of Political Philosophy 7(1): 30–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald 1986, Law's Empire, Cambridge, MA, Belknap

Dworkin, Ronald 1991, Taking Law Seriously: New Impressions with a Reply to Critics, London, Duckworth

Easson, Alex 1994, “Integration Through Law: The Court of Justice and the Achievement of the Single Market and the European Union,” in Michelmann, Hans J. and Soldatos, Panayotis (eds.), European Integration: Theories and Approaches, Lanham, MD, University Press of America, 77–97

Ebert, Werner and Steffen, Meyer 1999, “Die Anreizwirkungen des Finanzausgleichs,” Wirtschaftsdienst 79(2): 106–14Google Scholar

Eckert, Dieter 1995, “Die neue Welthandelsordnung und ihre Bedeutung für den internationalen Lebensmittelhandel,” Zeitschrift für das gesamte Lebensmittelrecht 3, 365–93Google Scholar

Eder, Klaus and Kantner, Cathleen 2000, “Transnationale Resonanzstrukturen in Europa. Eine Kritik der Rede vom Öffentlichkeitsdefizit in Europa,” in Bach, Maurizio (ed.), Die Europäisierung nationaler Gesellschaften (Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie – Sonderheft 40), Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 306–31

Eder, Klaus, Hellmann, Kai-Uwe and Trenz, Hans-Jörg 1998, “Regieren in Europa jenseits öffentlicher Legitimation? Eine Untersuchung zur Rolle von politischer Öffentlichkeit in Europa,” in Kohler-Koch, Beate (ed.), Regieren in entgrenzten Räumen (PVS-Sonderheft 29), Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 321–44

Eggers, Barbara 1998, “Die Entscheidung des WTO Appellate Body im Hormonfall. Doch ein Recht auf Vorsorge?,” Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 9(5–6): 147–51Google Scholar

Eick, Christian 1981, “Wirtschaftssubventionen. Anmerkungen zu einer aktuellen Debatte,” Bremer Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik 4(4): 5–43Google Scholar

Eising, Rainer and Kohler-Koch, Beate 1994, “Inflation und Zerfaserung: Trends der Interessenvermittlung in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft,” in Streeck, Wolfgang (ed.), Staat und Verbände (PVS-Sonderheft 25/1994), Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 175–206

Eising, Rainer and Kohler-Koch, Beate 1999, “Governance in the European Union. A Comparative Assessment,” in Kohler-Koch, Beate and Eising, Rainer (eds.), The Transformation of Governance in the European Union, London, Routledge, 266–84

Elias, Norbert 1969, Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation. Soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen, Bern, Francke

Elster, Jon 1992, “Arguing and Bargaining in the Federal Convention and the Assemblée Constituante,” in Malnes, Raino and Underdal, Arild (eds.), Rationality and Institutions. Essays in Honour of Knut Midgaard, Oslo, Universitetsforlaget, 13–50

Elster, Jon 1998a, “Introduction,” in Elster, Jon (ed.), Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge University Press, 1–18

Elster, Jon 1998b, “Deliberation and Constitution Making,” in Elster, Jon (ed.), Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge University Press, 97–122

Engels, Rainer 1996, Die Codex Alimentarius Kommission und der Einsatz von Hormonen in der Tierernährung. Vorsorgeprinzip oder blindes Vertrauen in die Wissenschaft. Form Umwelt & Entwicklung, Bonn, BUND

Eriksen, Erik Oddvar and Fossum, John Erik (eds.) 2000, Democracy in the European Union: Integration Through Deliberation?, London, Routledge

Eriksen, Erik O., Fossum, John E. and Menéndez, Agustín José (eds.) 2003, Developing a Constitution for Europe, London, Routledge

European Parliament 1997, Report by the Temporary Committee of Inquiry Into BSE on Alleged Contraventions or Maladministration in the Implementation of Community Law in Relation to BSE, Without Prejudice to the Jurisdiction of the Community and National Courts, PE 220.544/fin., Luxembourg, Office of Official Publications

European Parliament and European Commission 1999, The European Union and Food Security: Lessons from the BSE Crisis, Luxembourg, Office of Official Publications

Evers, Tilmann 1994, “Supranationale Staatlichkeit am Beispiel der Europäischen Union: Civitas Civitatum oder Monstrum?,” Leviathan 22(1): 115–34Google Scholar

Falke, Josef 1996, “Comitology and other Committees: A Preliminary Empirical Assessment,” in Pedler, Robert H. and Schaefer, Guenther F. (eds), Shaping European Law and Policy. The Role of Committees and Comitology in the Political Process, Maastricht, European Institute of Public Administration, 117–66

Falkenkötter, Thomas 1996, “Der Streit um die sächsischen VW-Beihilfen – Anlaß für grundsätzliche Klärung?,” Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 49(41): 2689–94Google Scholar

Färber, Gisela 1989, “Subventionen in der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft. Subventionsbegriff und Subventionspolitik in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Lichte gewandelter finanzpolitischer Konzeptionen,” in Fischer, Wolfram (ed.), Währungsreform und Soziale Marktwirtschaft. Erfahrungen und Perspektiven nach 40 Jahren (Schriften des Vereins für Socialpolitik N.F. 190), Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 319–43

Färber, Gisela 1995, Binnenmarktgerechte Subventionspolitik in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft. Strukturen, Normen und Defizite, Frankfurt/M, Campus

Färber, Gisela 1996, “Regionen in der Finanzverfassung der Europäischen Union – Probleme und Reformvorschläge,” Steuer und Wirtschaft 73(4): 379–94Google Scholar

Feick, Jürgen 2000, “Wissen, Expertise und regulative Politik: Das Beispiel der Arzneimittelkontrolle,” in Werle, Raymund and Schimank, Uwe (eds.), Gesellschaftliche Komplexität und kollektive Handlungsfähigkeit, Frankfurt/M, Campus, 208–33

Finnemore, Martha 1996, National Interests in International Society, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press

Finnemore, Martha and Toope, Stephen J. 2001, “Comment on Legalization and World Politics,” International Organization 55(3): 743–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraenkel, Ernst 1932, “Die politische Bedeutung des Arbeitsrechts,” in Ramm, Thilo (ed.), Arbeitsrecht und Politik, Neuwied, Luchterhand, 247–60

Franck, Thomas M. 1990, The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations, Oxford University Press

Franck, Thomas M. 1995, Fairness in International Law and Institutions, Oxford, Clarendon Press

Franz, Wolfgang 1992, “Keynesianische Beschäftigungstheorie und Beschäftigungspolitik,” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte B 12/92, 25–31Google Scholar

Franzmeyer, Fritz 1993, “Die Europäische Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion: Ausbau der gemeinschaftlichen Kohäsionspolitik,” Integration 16(2): 95–102Google Scholar

Garrett, Geoffrey 1992, “International Cooperation and Institutional Choice. The European Community's Internal Market,” International Organization 46(2): 533–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garrett, Geoffrey 1995, “The Politics of Legal Integration in the European Union,” International Organization 49(1): 171–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garrett, Geoffrey, Kelemen, R. Daniel and Heiner, Schulz 1998, “The European Court of Justice, National Governments, and Legal Integration in the European Union,” International Organization 52(1): 149–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor 1996, “Democratic States and Commitment in International Relations,” International Organization 50(1): 109–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gawron, Thomas and Ralf, Rogowski 1996, “Effektivität, Implementation und Evaluation. Wirkungsanalyse am Beispiel von Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts,” Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 17(2): 177–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gehring, Thomas 1996, “Arguing und Bargaining in internationalen Verhandlungen. Überlegungen am Beispiel des Ozonschutzregimes,” in Prittwitz, Volker von (ed.), Verhandeln und Argumentieren. Dialog, Interessen und Macht in der Umweltpolitik, Opladen, Leske+Budrich, 207–38

Gehring, Thomas 2002, “Schutzstandards in der WTO? Die schleichende Verknüpfung der Welthandelsordnung mit standardsetzenden internationalen Institutionen,” in Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Knodt, Michèle (eds.), Regieren in internationalen Institutionen, Opladen, Leske + Budrich, 111–39

Gerstenberg, Oliver 1997, Bürgerrechte und Demokratie, Frankfurt/M, Suhrkamp

Gerstenberg, Oliver 2000, “Justification (and Justifiability) of Private Law in a Polycontextual World,” Social and Legal Studies 9(3): 419–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerstenberg, Oliver and Sabel, Charles F. 2002, “Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy, An Institutional Ideal for Europe?,” in Joerges, Christian and Dehousse, Renaud (eds.), Good Governance in Europe's Integrated Market, Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, vol. Ⅺ/2, Oxford University Press, 289–341

Gessner, Volkmar and Budak, Ali Cen 1998, Emerging Legal Certainty: Empirical Studies on the Globalization of Law, Aldershot, Ashgate

Gibson, James L. 1989, “Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance,” Law and Society Review 23(3): 469–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibson, James L. and Gregory, Caldeira A. 1993, “The European Court of Justice: A Question of Legitimacy,” Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 14(2): 204–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibson, James L. and Caldeira, Gregory A. 1998, “Changes in the Legitimacy of the European Court of Justice: A Post-Maastricht Analysis,” British Journal of Political Science 28(1): 63–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giddens, Anthony 1994, Beyond Left and Right. The Future of Radical Politics, Cambridge, Polity Press

Godt, Christine 1998, “Der Bericht des Appellate Body der WTO zum EG-Einfuhrverbot von Hormonfleisch. Risikoregulierung im Weltmarkt,” Europäisches Wirtschafts- und Steuerrecht 9(6): 202–9Google Scholar

Goldstein, Judith 1996, “International Law and Domestic Institutions. Reconciling North American ‘Unfair’ Trade Laws,” International Organization 50(4): 541–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, Judith, Kahler, Miles, Keohane, Robert O. and Anne-Marie, Slaughter 2000, “Introduction: Legalization and World Politics,” International Organization 54(3): 385–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, Judith and Martin, Lisa L. 2000, “Legalization, Trade Liberalization, and Domestic Politics: A Cautionary Note,” International Organization 54(3): 603–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodin, Robert 1988, “What Is So Special About Our Fellow Countrymen?,” Ethics 98(4): 663–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Götz, Volkmar 1984, “Rückforderung von Subventionen,” Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht 3(8): 480–5Google Scholar

Grande, Edgar and Jachtenfuchs, Markus (eds.) 2000, Problemlösungsfähigkeit der Europäischen Union, Baden-Baden, Nomos

Greven, Michael Th. 2000, “Can the European Union Finally Become a Democracy?,” in Greven, Michael Th. and Pauly, Louis W. (eds.), Democracy Beyond the State?, Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield, 35–62

Grieco, Joseph M. 1990, Cooperation Among Nations. Europe, America, and Non-Tariff Barriers to Trade, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press

Griller, Stefan 2000, “Judicial Enforceability of WTO Law in the European Union: Annotation to Case C-149/96, Portugal v. Council,” Journal of International Economic Law 3(3): 441–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Günther, Klaus 1988, Der Sinn für Angemessenheit. Anwendungsdiskurse in Moral und Recht, Frankfurt/M, Suhrkamp

Haas, Peter M. 1998, “Compliance with EU Directives: Insights from International Relations and Comparative Politics,” Journal of European Public Policy 5(1): 17–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haas, Peter M., Keohane, Robert O. and Levy, Marc A. (eds.) 1993, Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press

Habermas, Jürgen 1981, Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Vol. 2, Frankfurt/M, Suhrkamp

Habermas, Jürgen 1985, “Law as Medium and Law as Institution,” in Teubner, Gunther (ed.), Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State, Berlin, de Gruyter, 203–20

Habermas, Jürgen 1994a, Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp

Habermas, Jürgen 1994b, “Über den inneren Zusammenhang von Rechtsstaat und Demokratie,” in Preuß, Ulrich K. (ed.), Zum Begriff der Verfassung, Frankfurt/M, Fischer, 83–94. [= Jürgen Habermas 2001, “Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?,” Political Theory 29(6): 766–81]

Habermas, Jürgen 1997, Die Einbeziehung des Anderen: Studien zur politischen Theorie, Frankfurt/M, Suhrkamp

Habermas, Jürgen 2001, “Remarks on Legitimation through Human Rights,” in Habermas, Jürgen (ed.), The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays, Cambridge, Polity, 113–29

Hall, Peter A. 1989, “Introduction,” in Hall, Peter A. (ed.), The Political Power of Economic Ideas. Keynesianism across Nations, Princeton University Press, 3–26

Hancher, Leigh 1994, “State Aids and Judicial Control in the European Community,” European Competition Law Review 15(3): 134–50Google Scholar

Harlow, Carol 1996, “Francovich and the Problem of the Disobedient State,” European Law Journal 2(3): 199–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, Herbert Lionel Adolphus 1972, The Concept of Law, Oxford, Clarendon

Harzem, Kerstin 1988, Subventionen aus der Sicht der Neuen Politischen Ökonomie, Köln, Deutscher Institut Verlag

Hasenclever, Andreas, Mayer, Peter and Rittberger, Volker 1997, Theories of International Regimes, Cambridge University Press

Hathaway, Oona A. 2002, “Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?,” Yale Law Journal 111(8): 1935–2038CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heinemann, Friedrich 1998, EU-Finanzreform. Eine Synopse der politischen und wissenschaftlichen Diskussion und eine neue Reformkonzeption, Gütersloh, Bertelsmann Stiftung

Heise, Arne, Mülhaupt, Bernd, Seifert, Hartmut, Schäfer, Claus, Störmann, Wiebke and Astrid, Ziegler 1998, “Begutachtung des Wirtschaftsstandorts Deutschland aus einer anderen Sicht,” WSI Mitteilungen 51(6): 393–417Google Scholar

Held, David 1995, Democracy and the Global Order. From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Democracy, Cambridge, Polity Press

Henkin, Louis 1979, How Nations Behave. Law and Foreign Policy, New York, Columbia University Press

Héritier, Adrienne 1996, “The Accommodation of Diversity in European Policy Making and its Outcomes: Regulatory Policy as a Patchwork,” Journal of European Public Policy 3(2): 149–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Héritier, Adrienne, Knill, Christoph and Mingers, Susanne 1996, Ringing the Changes of Europe: Regulatory Competition and the Transformation of the State ∔ Britain, France, Germany, Berlin, de Gruyter

Herwig, Alexia 2004, “Transnational Governance Regimes for Foods Derived From Bio-Technology and Their Legitimacy,” in Joerges, Christian, Sand, Inger-Johanne and Teubner, Gunther (eds.), Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism, Oxford, Hart, 199–222

Hilf, Meinhard 1991, “Settlement of Disputes in International Economic Organizations: Comparative Analysis and Proposals for Strengthening the GATT Dispute Settlement Procedures,” in Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich and Hilf, Meinhard (eds.), The New GATT Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Legal and Economic Problems, Deventer, Kluwer, 285–322

Hilf, Meinhard 2001, “Power, Rules and Principles: Which Orientation for WTO/GATT Law?,” Journal of International Economic Law 4(1): 111–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hilf, Meinhard 2003, “Die Konstitutionalisierung der Welthandelsordnung. Struktur, Institutionen und Verfahren,” Berichte der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Völkerrecht 2003, 257–82Google Scholar

Hilf, Meinhard and Barbara, Eggers 1997, “Der WTO-Panelbericht im EG/USA-Hormonstreit. Anstoß zum grenzenlosen Weltbinnenmarkt oder Eigentor der WTO?,” Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 18, 559–66Google Scholar

Hilf, Meinhard and Matthias, Reuß 1997, “Verfassungsfragen lebensmittelrechtlicher Normierung im europäischen und internationalen Recht,” Zeitschrift für das gesamte Lebensmittelrecht 24(3): 289–302Google Scholar

Hoekman, Bernard M. and Mavroidis, Petros C. 1996, “Policy Externalities and High-Tech Rivalry: Competition and Multilateral Cooperation Beyond the WTO,” Leiden Journal of International Law 9(2): 273–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoekman, Bernard M. and Mavroidis, Petros C. 2000, “WTO Dispute Settlement, Transparency and Surveillance,” World Economy 23(4): 527–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffmann-Riem, Wolfgang and Schmidt-Aßmann, Eberhard (eds.) 1996, Öffentliches Recht und Privatrecht als wechselseitige Auffangordnungen, Baden-Baden, Nomos

Holmes, Oliver W. 1897, “The Path of Law,” Harvard Law Review 10, 458–78Google Scholar

Hooghe, Lisbeth (ed.) 1996, Cohesion Policy and European Integration. Building Multi-level Governance, Oxford University Press

Horn, Norbert 1996, Einführung in die Rechtswissenschaft und Rechtsphilosophie, Heidelberg, C. F. Müller

Howard, Christopher 1995, “Testing the Tools Approach: Tax Expenditures Versus Direct Expenditures,” Public Administration Review 55(5): 439–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard, Christopher 1997, The Hidden Welfare State. Tax Expenditures and Social Policy in the United States, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press

Howse, Robert 1999, “Adjudicative Legitimacy and Treaty Interpretation in International Trade Law: The Early Years of WTO Jurisprudence,” in Weiler, Joseph H. H. (ed.), The EU, the WTO and the NAFTA: Towards a Common Law of International Trade, Oxford University Press, 35–70

Howse, Robert and Nicolaïdis, Kalypso 2001, “Legitimacy and Global Governance: Why Constitutionalizing the WTO Is a Step Too Far,” in Porter, Roger B., Sauve, Pierre, Subramanaian, Arvind and Zampetti, Beviglia (eds.), Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium, Washington, DC, Brookings Institution Press, 227–52

Hrbek, Rudolf 1996, “Eine politische Bewertung der VW-Beihilfen-Kontroverse,” Wirtschaftsdienst 76(10): 506–9Google Scholar

Hübl, Lothar and Legler, Harald 1983, Der Subventionskodex der Länderwirtschaftsminister angewendet auf ausgewählte Finanzhilfen an die gewerbliche Wirtschaft. Gutachten im Auftrag des Niedersächsischen Ministers für Wirtschaft und Verkehr, Hannover, Niedersächsisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung

Hudec, Robert E. 1993, Enforcing International Trade Law. The Evolution of the Modern GATT Legal System, Salem, NH, Butterworth

Hudec, Robert E. 1999, “The New WTO Dispute Settlement Procedure: An Overview of the First Three Years,” Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 8(1): 1–53Google Scholar

Hurd, Ian 1999, “Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics,” International Organization 53(2): 379–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurrell, Andrew 1993, “International Society and the Study of Regimes. A Reflective Approach,” in Rittberger, Volker (ed.), Regime Theory and International Relations, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 49–72

Ikenberry, G. John 1993, “Creating Yesterday's New World Order: Keynes-ian ‘New Thinking’ and the Anglo-American Postwar Settlement,” in Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O. (eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy. Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 57–86

Ipsen, Hans Peter 1972, Europäisches Gemeinschaftsrecht, Tübingen, Mohr

Jachtenfuchs, Markus 2001, “The Governance Approach to European Integration,” Journal of Common Market Studies 39(2): 245–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Kohler-Koch, Beate 1996, “Regieren im dynamischen Mehrebenensystem,” in Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Kohler-Koch, Beate (eds.), Europäische Integration, Opladen, Leske + Budrich, 15–44

Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Kohler-Koch, Beate 2003, “Regieren und Institutionenbildung,” in Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Kohler-Koch, Beate (eds.), Europäische Integration, Opladen, Leske + Budrich, 11–48

Jackson, John H. 1978, “The Jurisprudence of International Trade: The DISC Case in GATT,” American Journal of International Law 72(4): 747–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, John H. 1997, The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press

Jackson, John H. 1998, “Designing and Implementing Effective Dispute Settlement Procedures: WTO Dispute Settlement, Appraisal and Prospects,” in Krueger, Anne O. (ed.), The WTO as an International Organization, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 161–80

Jackson, John H. 1999, The World Trade Organization. Constitution and Jurisprudence, London, Royal Institute of International Affairs

Jackson, John H. 2000, The Jurisprudence of GATT and the WTO. Insights on Treaty Law and Economic Relations, Cambridge University Press

Jacobson, Harold K. and Weiss, Edith Brown 1998a, “A Framework for Analysis,” in Weiss, Edith Brown and Jacobson, Harold K. (eds.), Engaging Countries. Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1–18

Jacobson, Harold K. and Weiss, Edith Brown 1998b, “Assessing the Record and Designing Strategies to Engage Countries,” in Weiss, Edith Brown and Jacobson, Harold K. (eds.), Engaging Countries. Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 511–54

Joerges, Christian 1989, “Politische Rechtstheorie and Critical Legal Studies: Points of Contacts and Divergencies,” in Joerges, Christian and Trubek, David M. (eds.), Critical Legal Thought: An American-German Debate, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 597–643

Joerges, Christian 1994, “Rationalisierungsprozesse im Recht der Produktsicherheit: Öffentliches Recht und Haftungsrecht unter dem Einfluß der Europäischen Integration,” Jahrbuch für Umwelt- und Technikrecht 27, 141–78Google Scholar

Joerges, Christian 1996a, “Taking the Law Seriously: On Political Science and the Role of Law in the Process of European Integration,” European Law Journal 2(2): 105–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joerges, Christian 1996b, The Emergence of Denationalized Governance Structures and the European Court of Justice, Arena Working Paper 16/1996, Oslo, Arena

Joerges, Christian 1997, “Scientific Expertise in Social Regulation and the European Court of Justice: Legal Frameworks for Denationalized Governance Structures,” in Joerges, Christian, Ladeur, Karl-Heinz and Vos, Ellen (eds.), Integrating Scientific Expertise into Regulatory Decision-Making. National Traditions and European Innovations, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 295–324

Joerges, Christian 2000, “Interactive Adjudication in the Europeanisation Process? A Demanding Perspective and a Modest Example,” European Review of Private Law 8(1): 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joerges, Christian 2001, “Law, Science and the Management of Risks to Health at the National, European and International Level. Stories on Baby Dummies, Mad Cows and Hormones in Beef,” Columbia Journal of European Law 7(1): 1–19Google Scholar

Joerges, Christian 2002a, “‘Deliberative Supranationalism’ – Two Defences,” European Law Journal 8(1): 133–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joerges, Christian 2002b, “The Law in the Process of Constitutionalizing Europe,” in Eriksen, Erik O., Fossum, John E. and Menéndez, Agustín J. (eds.), Constitution Making and Democratic Legitimacy, Arena Report 5/2002, Oslo, Arena, 13–48

Joerges, Christian 2003, “Comitology and the European Model? Towards a Recht-Fertigungs-Recht in the Europeanisation Process,” in Neyer, Jürgen et al. (eds.), The Forging of Deliberative Supranationalism in the EU, Arena Report 02/2003, Oslo, Arena, 501–40

Joerges, Christian 2004, “Constitutionalism and Transnational Governance: Exploring a Magic Triangle,” in Joerges, Christian, Sand, Inger-Johanne and Teubner, Gunther (eds.), Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism, Oxford, Hart, 339–75

Joerges, Christian and Falke, Josef (eds.) 2000, Das Ausschußwesen der Europäischen Union. Praxis der Risikoregulierung im Binnenmarkt und ihre rechtliche Verfassung, Baden-Baden, Nomos

Joerges, Christian and Jürgen, Neyer 1997a, “From Intergovernmental Bargaining to Deliberative Political Processes: The Constitutionalisation of Comitology,” European Law Journal 3(3): 273–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joerges, Christian and Jürgen, Neyer 1997b, “Transforming Strategic Interaction into Deliberative Problem-Solving. European Comitology in the Foodstuffs Sector,” Journal of European Public Policy 4(4): 609–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joerges, Christian and Jürgen, Neyer 2003, “Politics, Risk Management, WTO Governance and the Limits of Legalisation,” Science and Public Policy 30(3): 219–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joerges, Christian, Schepel, Harm and Vos, Ellen 1999, The Law's Problems with the Involvement of Non-governmental Actors in Europe's Legislative Process: The Case of Standardisation Under the “New Approach”, EUI Working Paper Law 9/99, Florence, European University Institute

Joerges, Christian and Vos, Ellen (eds.) 1999, European Committees: Social Regulation, Law and Politics, Oxford, Hart

Jönsson, Christer and Jonas, Tallberg 1998, “Compliance and Post-Agreement Bargaining,” European Journal of International Relations 4(4): 371–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahler, Miles 1995, International Institutions and the Political Economy of Integration, Washington, DC, Brookings Institution

Kelemen, R. Daniel 2001, “The Limits of Judicial Power: Trade-Environment Disputes in GATT/WTO and the EU,” Comparative Political Studies 34(6): 622–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelsen, Hans 1966, Principles of International Law, New York, Holt, Rinehart, Winston

Kent, Ann 1995, “China and the International Human Rights Regime. A Case Study of Multilateral Monitoring, 1989–1994,” Human Rights Quarterly 17(1): 1–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keohane, Robert O. 1984, After Hegemony: Collaboration and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton University Press

Keohane, Robert O. 1986, “Reciprocity in International Relations,” International Organization 40(1): 1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keohane, Robert O. 1997, “International Relations and International Law: Two Optics,” Harvard International Law Journal 38(2): 487–502Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew and Anne-Marie, Slaughter 2000, “Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational,” International Organization 54(3): 457–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kesper, Irene 1998, Bundestaatliche Finanzordnung, Grundlagen, Bestand, Reform, Baden-Baden, Nomos

Kielmansegg, Peter Graf 1994, “Läßt sich die Europäische Gemeinschaft demokratisch verfassen?,” Europäische Rundschau 22(2): 23–33Google Scholar

Kielmansegg, Peter Graf 2003, “Integration und Demokratie (mit Nachwort zur 2. Auflage),” in Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Kohler-Koch, Beate (eds.), Europäische Integration, Opladen, Leske + Budrich, 49–83

Kiemmer, Paul 1986, “Die Kontroverse um die Daimler-Benz-Beihilfe,” Wirtschaftsdienst 66(11): 550–4Google Scholar

King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O. and Verba, Sidney 1994, Designing Social Inquiry. Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton University Press

Kiss, Alexandre-Charles 1996, “Compliance with International and European Environmental Obligations,” Hague Yearbook of International Law 9, 45–54Google Scholar

Klein, Eckart 1998, “The Reporting System under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,” in Klein, Eckart (ed.), The Monitoring System of Human Rights Treaty Obligations, Berlin, Berlin-Verlag, 17–30

Knill, Christoph and Andrea, Lenschow 1999, “Neue Konzepte – alte Probleme? Die institutionellen Grenzen effektiver Implementation,” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 40(4): 591–617Google Scholar

Koh, Harold Hongju 1997, “Why Do Nations Obey International Law?,” Yale Law Journal 106(8): 2599–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohler-Koch, Beate 1992, “Interessen und Integration. Die Rolle organisierter Interessen im westeuropäischen Integrationsprozeß,” in Kreile, Michael (ed.), Die Integration Europas (PVS-Sonderheft 23/1992), Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 81–119

Kohler-Koch, Beate 1994, “Changing Patterns of Interest Intermediation in the European Union,” Government & Opposition 29(2): 166–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohler-Koch, Beate 1999, “The Evolution and Transformation of European Governance,” in Kohler-Koch, Beate and Eising, Rainer (eds.), The Transformation of Governance in the European Union, London, Routledge, 14–35

Komuro, Norio 1995, “The WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism – Coverage and Procedures of the WTO Understanding,” Journal of World Trade 29(4): 5–96Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti 2002, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations. The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960, Cambridge University Press

Krasner, Stephen D. (ed.) 1983, International Regimes, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press

Krasner, Stephen D. 1999, Sovereignty. Organized Hypocrisy, Princeton University Press

Kratochwil, Friederich 1989, Rules, Norms, and Decisions. On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs, Cambridge University Press

Krieger-Boden, Christiane and Lammers, Konrad 1996, Subventionsabbau in räumlicher Perspektive: Wirkungszusammenhänge und Schlussfolgerungen, Kieler Diskussionsbeiträge 280, Kiel, Institut für Weltwirtschaft

Krislov, Saul, Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter and Weiler, J. H. H. 1986, “The Political Organs and the Decision-Making Process in the United States and the European Community,” in Cappelletti, Mauro, Seccombe, Monica and Weiler, Joseph H. H. (eds.), Integration through Law. Methods, Tools and Institutions: Political Organs, Integration Techniques and Judicial Process, Berlin, de Gruyter, 3–112

Krüger, Malte 1998, “Kann Industriepolitik die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit verbessern?,” in Donges, Juergen B. and Freytag, Andreas (eds.), Die Rolle des Staates in einer globalisierten Wirtschaft, Stuttgart, Lucius & Lucius, 217–35

Lahnstein, Manfred 1978, “Probleme des kooperativen Föderalismus aus finanzpolitischer Sicht des Bundes,” WSI Mitteilungen 31(8): 434–42Google Scholar

Laird, Sam 1999, “The WTO's Trade Policy Review Mechanism – From Through the Looking Glass,” World Economy 22(2): 741–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lang, Jochen, Naschold, Frieder and Reissert, Bernd 1998, Management der EU-Strukturpolitik, Berlin, Edition Sigma

Lang, Winfried (ed.) 1995, Sustainable Development and International Law, London, Graham & Trotman

Lascher, Edward L. 1996, “Assessing Legislative Deliberation: A Preface to Empirical Analysis,” Legislative Studies Quarterly 21(4): 501–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lasok, K. P. E. 1990, “The Commission's Powers Over Illegal State Aids,” European Competition Law Review 11(3): 125–7Google Scholar

Laursen, Finn and Vanhoonacker, Sophie (eds.) 1992, The Intergovernmental Conference on Political Union, Maastricht, European Institute of Public Administration

Lavdas, Kostas A. and Mendrinou, Maria M. 1999, Politics, Subsidies and Competition. The New Politics of State Intervention in the European Union, Aldershot, Elgar

Lee, Philip and Brian, Kennedy 1996, “The Potential Direct Effect of GATT 1994 in European Community Law,” Journal of World Trade 30(1): 67–89Google Scholar

Leibfried, Stephan and Pierson, Paul (eds.) 1995, European Social Policy. Between Fragmentation and Integration, Washington, DC, Brookings Institution

Levy, Marc A. 1993, “European Acid Rain. The Power of Tote-Board Diplomacy,” in Haas, Peter M., Keohane, Robert O. and Levy, Marc A. (eds.), Institutions for the Earth. Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 75–132

Levy, Marc A., Young, Oran R. and Michael, Zürn 1995, “The Study of International Regimes,” European Journal of International Relations 1(3): 267–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, Jeffrey 1998, The Institutional Problem-Solving Capacities of the Council. The Committee of Permanent Representatives and the Methods of Community, MPIFG Discussion Paper 98/1, Köln, Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung

Liemt, Gijsbert van (ed.) 1992, Industry on the Move: Causes and Consequences of International Relocation in the Manufacturing Industry, Geneva, International Labour Organization

Liese, Andrea 2001, Staaten am Pranger. Zur Wirkung internationaler Regime auf die innerstaatliche Menschenrechtspolitik, PhD thesis, Universität Bremen

Lijphart, Arend 1977, Democracy in Plural Societies. A Comparative Exploration, New Haven, Yale University Press

Lind, E. Allan 1995, “Verfahrensgerechtigkeit und Akzeptanz rechtlicher Autorität,” in Bierbrauer, Günter, Gottwald, Walther and Birnbreier-Stahlberger, Beatrix (eds.), Verfahrensgerechtigkeit. Rechtspsychologische Forschungsbeiträge für die Justizpraxis, Köln, Otto Schmidt, 3–19

Lindberg, Leon N. and Scheingold, Stuart A. 1970, Europe's Would-Be Polity. Patterns of Change in the European Community, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall

Link, Werner 1998, Die Neuordnung der Weltpolitik. Grundprobleme globaler Politik an der Schwelle zum 21. Jahrhundert, München, Beck

Lowi, Theodore 1972, “Four Systems of Policy, Politics and Choice,” Public Administration Review 32(4): 298–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas 1972, Rechtssoziologie 2, Reinbek, Rowohlt

Luhmann, Niklas 1973, Zweckbegriff und Systemrationalität, Frankfurt/M, Suhrkamp

Luhmann, Niklas 1993, Das Recht der Gesellschaft, Frankfurt/M, Suhrkamp

Lukas, Martin 1995, “The Role of Private Parties in the Enforcement of the Uruguay Round Agreements,” Journal of World Trade 29(5): 181–206Google Scholar

Macrory, Richard 1992, “The Enforcement of Community Environmental Laws: Some Critical Issues,” Common Market Law Review 29(2): 347–69Google Scholar

Maduro, M. Poiares 1998, We, the Court. The European Court of Justice and the European Economic Constitution, Oxford, Hart

Majone, Giandomenico 1994, “The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe,” West European Politics 17(3): 77–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico 1998, “Europe's ‘Democratic Deficit’: The Question of Standards,” European Law Journal 4(1): 5–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico 2001, “Nonmajoritarian Institutions and the Limits of Democratic Governance: A Political Transaction-Cost Approach,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 157(1): 57–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico 2002, “What Price Safety? The Precautionary Principle and its Policy Implications,” Journal of Common Market Studies 40(1): 89–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mancini, G. Federico 1991, “The Making of a Constitution for Europe,” in Keohane, Robert O. and Hoffmann, Stanley (eds.), The New European Community. Decisionmaking and Institutional Change, Boulder, CO, Westview, 177–94

Marks, Gary 1992, “Structural Policy in the European Community,” in Sbragia, Alberta M. (ed.), Euro-Politics. Institutions and Policymaking in the “New” European Community, Washington, DC, Brookings Institution, 191–224

Marks, Gary 1997, “Does the European Union Represent an N of 1?,” ECSA Review 10(3): 2–3Google Scholar

Marks, Gary, Scharpf, Fritz W., Schmitter, Philippe C. and Streeck, Wolfgang (eds.) 1996, Governance in the European Union, London, Sage

Martin, Lisa L. 1993, “The Rational State Choice of Multilateralism,” in Ruggie, John Gerard (ed.), Multilateralism Matters. The Theory and Practice of an International Form, New York, Columbia University Press, 91–121

Mattli, Walter and Slaughter, Anne-Marie 1998, “Revisiting the European Court of Justice,” International Organization 52(1): 177–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, Franz C. 2000, Kompetenzüberschreitung und Letztentscheidung. Das Maastricht-Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgrichts und die Letztentscheidung über ultra-vires Konflikte in Mehrebenensystemen. Eine rechtsvergleichende Betrachtung von Konflikten zwischen Gerichten am Beispiel der EU und der USA, München, Beck

Mayntz, Renate (ed.) 1980, Implementation politischer Programme. Empirische Forschungsberichte, Königstein/Ts, Athenäum

McDougal, Myres S., Lasswell, Harold D. and Reisman, W. Michael 1968, “Theories about International Law: Prologue to a Configurative Jurisprudence,” Virginia Journal of International Law 8, 188–299Google Scholar

McGowan, Francis 2000, “Competition Policy: The Limits of the European Regulatory State,” in Wallace, Helen and Wallace, William (eds.), Policy-Making in the European Union, Oxford University Press, 115–47

McLarty, Taunya 1994, “GATT 1994 Dispute Settlement: Sacrificing Diplomacy for Efficiency in the Multilateral Trading System?,” Florida Journal of International Law 9(2): 241–75Google Scholar

Mearsheimer, John 1994, “The False Promise of International Institutions,” International Security 19(3): 5–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mearsheimer, John 2002, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York, W. W. Norton

Mendrinou, Maria 1996, “Non-Compliance and the European Commission's Role in Integration,” Journal of European Public Policy 3(1): 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meng, Werner P. 1990, “The Hormone Conflict Between the EEC and the United States Within the Context of GATT,” Michigan Journal of International Law 11(4): 819–39Google Scholar

Mestmäcker, Ernst-Joachim 1994, “On the Legitimacy of European Law,” Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht 58(4): 615–35Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank I. 1999, Brennan and Democracy, Princeton University Press

Miles, Edward, Underdal, Arild, Andresen, Steinar, Wettestad, J⊘rgen, Skjærseth, Jon Birger and Carlin, Elaine M. 2002, Explaining Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press

Miller, David 1988, “The Ethical Significance of Nationality,” Ethics 98(4): 647–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, David 1995, On Nationality, Oxford, Clarendon Press

Mills, Geoffrey and Hugh, Rockoff 1987, “Compliance with Price Controls in the United States and the United Kingdom During World War II,” Journal of Economic History 47(1): 197–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, Ronald B. 1994, “Regime Design Matters. International Oil Pollution and Treaty Compliance,” International Organization 48(3): 425–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, Ronald B. and Keilbach, Patricia M. 2001, “Situation Structure and Institutional Design: Reciprocity, Coercion, and Exchange,” International Organization 55(4): 891–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew 1997a, “Does the European Union Represent an N of 1?,” ECSA Review 10(3): 3–4Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew 1997b, “Warum die Europäische Union die Exekutive stärkt: Innenpolitik und internationale Kooperation,” in Wolf, Klaus Dieter (ed.), Projekt Europa im Übergang? Probleme, Modelle und Strategien des Regierens in der Europäischen Union, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 211–69

Moravcsik, Andrew 1998, The Choice for Europe. Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press

Morgan, T. Clifton and Schwebach, Valerie L. 1997, “Fools Suffer Gladly: The Use of Economic Sanctions in International Crises,” International Studies Quarterly 41(1): 27–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans J. 1949, Politics Among Nations. The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York, Knopf

Morrow, James D. 1994, Game Theory for Political Scientists, Princeton University Press

Müller, Harald 2002, “Antinomien des demokratischen Friedens,” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 43(1): 46–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, Harald and Risse-Kappen, Thomas 1990, “Internationale Umwelt, gesellschaftliches Umfeld und außenpolitischer Prozeß in liberaldemokratischen Industrienationen,” in Rittberger, Volker (ed.), Theorien der internationalen Beziehungen. Bestandsaufnahme und Forschungsperspektiven, PVS-Sonderheft 21, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 375–400

Müller, Ulrich 1984, “Ordnungspolitische Vorkehrungen zur Durchsetzung der GATT-Regeln,” Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik 33(2–3): 261–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nägele, Frank 1996, Regionale Wirtschaftspolitik im kooperativen Bundesstaat. Ein Politikfeld im Prozeß der deutschen Vereinigung, Opladen, Leske+Budrich

Nägele, Frank 1997, “Die ‘graue Eminenz’ der regionalen Wirtschaftspolitik. Zur regionalpolitischen Bedeutung der EG-Beihilfenkontrolle in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland,” Staatswissenschaften und Staatspraxis 8(1): 109–30Google Scholar

Neuhaus, Karl Herbert 1987, Möglichkeiten und Grenzen einer zentralen Erfassung von Subventionen der Länder, Schwerpunkt Finanzwissenschaft/Betriebswirtschaftliche Steuerlehre – Arbeitspapier 11, Trier, Universität Trier

Neyer, Jürgen 1999, “Legitimes Recht oberhalb des demokratischen Rechtsstaates? Supranationalität als Herausforderung für die Politikwissenschaft,” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 40(3): 390–414Google Scholar

Neyer, Jürgen 2000a, “Risikoregulierung im Binnenmarkt: Zur Problemlösungsfähigkeit der europäischen politischen Verwaltung,” in Falke, Josef and Joerges, Christian (eds.), Das Ausschußwesen der EU. Praxis der Risikoregulierung im Binnenmarkt und ihre rechtliche Verfassung, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 257–328

Neyer, Jürgen 2000b, “Risk Regulation and the Power of the People: Lessons from the BSE-Crisis,” European Integration online Papers (EIoP) 4(6) (http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2000-006a.htm)

Neyer, Jürgen 2003, “Discourse and Order in the EU. A Deliberative Approach to Multi-Level Governance,” Journal of Common Market Studies 41(4): 687–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neyer, Jürgen 2004, “Explaining the Unexpected: Effectiveness and Efficiency in European Policy-Making,” Journal of European Public Policy 11(1): 19–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicolaides, Phedon 2002, “The New Frontier in State Aid Control: An Economic Assessment of Measures that Compensate Enterprises,” Intereconomics 37(4): 190–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicolaysen, Gert 1996, “Der Streit um die VW-Beihilfen aus juristischer Sicht,” Wirtschaftsdienst 76(10): 503–6Google Scholar

Nieder-Eichholz, Markus 1995, Die Subventionsordnung. Ein Beitrag zur finanzwirtschaftlichen Ordnungspolitik, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot

O'Brien, Robert 1997, Subsidy Regulation and State Transformation in North America, the GATT and the EU, Basingstoke, Macmillan

O'Connell, Mary Ellen 1992, “Enforcing the New International Law of the Environment,” German Yearbook of International Law 35, 293–332Google Scholar

O'Connell, Mary Ellen 1995, “Enforcement and the Success of International Environmental Law,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 3(1): 47–64Google Scholar

Offe, Claus 2001, “Gibt es eine europäische Gesellschaft? Kann es sie geben?,” Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik 46(4): 423–35Google Scholar

Ostrom, Elinor 1990, Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press

Oye, Kenneth A. 1986, “Explaining Cooperation under Anarchy: Hypothesis and Strategies,” in Kenneth A. Oye (ed.), Cooperation under Anarchy, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1–24

Peffekoven, Rolf 1994, “Reform des Finanzausgleichs – eine vertane Chance,” Finanzarchiv N.F. 51(3): 281–311Google Scholar

Perez, Oren 1998, “Reconstructing Science: The Hormones Conflict Between the EU and United States,” European Foreign Affairs Review 3(4): 563–82Google Scholar

Peters, Bernhard 1991, Rationalität, Recht und Gesellschaft, Frankfurt/M, Suhrkamp

Peters, Bernhard 1994, “Der Sinn von Öffentlichkeit,” in Neidhardt, Friedhelm (ed.), Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegung (Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Sonderheft 34), Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 42–76

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich 1991, “Strengthening the GATT Dispute Settlement System: On the Use of Arbitration in GATT,” in Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich and Hilf, Meinhard (eds.), The New GATT Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Legal and Economic Problems, Deventer, Kluwer Law, 323–43

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich 1997a, “Darf die EG das Völkerrecht ignorieren?,” Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 8(11): 325–31Google Scholar

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich 1997b, “International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System 1948–1996. An Introduction,” in Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (ed.), International Trade Law and the GATT / WTO Dispute Settlement System, London, Kluwer Law International, 3–122

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich 1997c, The GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System. International Law, International Organizations and Dispute Settlement, London, Kluwer Law International

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich 1998, “How to Reform the United Nations? Lessons from the ‘International Economic Law Revolution’,” Aussenwirtschaft 53(2): 193–231Google Scholar

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich 2000, “From ‘Negative’ to ‘Positive’ Integration in the WTO. Time for ‘Mainstreaming Human Rights’ into WTO Law?,” Common Market Law Review 37(6): 1363–82Google Scholar

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich 2002, “Constitutionalism and WTO Law: From a State-Centred Approach Towards Human Rights in International Economic Law,” in Kennedy, Daniel L. M. and Southwick, James D. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law. Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec, Cambridge University Press, 32–67

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich and Jaenicke, Günther (eds.) 1992, Adjudication of International Trade Disputes in International and National Economic Law, Fribourg, Switzerland, Fribourg University Press

Picciotto, Sol 2000, Democratizing the New Global Public Sphere (http://www.lancs.ac.uk/staff/lwasp/demglobpub.pdf)

Plank, Rosine 1987, “An Unofficial Description of How a GATT Panel Works and Does Not,” Journal of International Arbitration 4(4): 53–102Google Scholar

Pollack, Mark A. 1995, “Regional Actors in an Intergovernmental Play. The Making and Implementation of EC Structural Policy,” in Rhodes, Carolyn and Mazey, Sonia (eds.), The State of European Union. Vol. 3: Building a European Polity, Boulder, CO, Lynne Rienner, 361–90

Pollack, Mark A. 1997, “Representing Diffuse Interests in EC Policymaking,” Journal of European Public Policy 4(4): 572–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polley, Romina 1996, “Die Konkurrentenklage im Europäischen Beihilfenrecht. Klagebefugnis und Rückforderung bei rechtswidrig gewährten Beihilfen,” Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 7(10): 300–5Google Scholar

Ponce-Nava, Diana 1995, “Capacity-Building in Environmental Law and Sustainable Development,” in Lang, Winfried (ed.), Sustainable Development and International Law, London, Graham & Trotman, 131–6

Pressman, Jeffrey L. and Wildavsky, Aaron 1984, Implementation, Berkeley, University of California Press

Raustiala, Kal 1995, The Domestication of International Commitments, Working Paper WP-95–115, Laxenburg, IIASA

Raustiala, Kal 1997, “Domestic Institutions and International Regulatory Cooperation. Comparative Responses to the Convention on Biological Diversity,” World Politics 49(4): 482–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raustiala, Kal and Slaughter, Anne-Marie 2002, “International Law, International Relations and Compliance,” in Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas and Simmons, Beth A. (eds.), Handbook of International Relations, London, Sage, 538–58

Raustiala, Kal and Victor, David G. 1998, “Conclusions,” in Victor, David G., Raustiala, Kal and Skolnikoff, Eugene B. (eds.), The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 659–707

Reinicke, Wolfgang 1998, Global Public Policy. Governing without Government?, Washington, DC, Brookings Institution Press

Renzsch, Wolfgang 1991, Finanzverfassung und Finanzausgleich. Die Auseinandersetzungen um ihre politische Gestaltung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland zwischen Währungsreform und deutscher Vereinigung (1948–1990), Bonn, Dietz

Renzsch, Wolfgang 1994, “Föderative Problembewältigung. Zur Einbeziehung der neuen Länder in einen gesamtdeutschen Finanzausgleich ab 1995,” Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 25(1): 116–38Google Scholar

Rieger, Elmar 1995, “Politik supranationaler Integration. Die Europäische Gemeinschaft in institutionentheoretischer Perspektive,” in Nedelmann, Brigitta (ed.), Politische Institutionen im Wandel (Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie Sonderheft 35), Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 349–67

Risse, Thomas 2000, “‘Let's Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics,” International Organization 54(1): 1–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Risse-Kappen, Thomas 1996, “Exploring the Nature of the Beast: International Relations Theory and Comparative Policy Analysis Meet the European Union,” Journal of Common Market Studies 34(1): 53–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rittberger, Volker and Michael, Zürn 1991, “Regime Theory: Findings from the Study of ‘East-West Regimes’,” Cooperation and Conflict 26(2): 165–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritter, Markus 1997, “Das WTO-Übereinkommen und seine Auswirkungen auf das Deutsche und Europäische Lebensmittelrecht. Hormonrückstände in Lebensmitteln als künftiger Standard?,” Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 8(5): 133–8Google Scholar

Romano, Cesare P. R. 1999, “The Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies: The Pieces of the Puzzle,” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 31(4): 709–52Google Scholar

Rosenschon, Astrid 1991, “Subventionen in den alten Bundesländern,” Weltwirtschaft (1): 76–90Google Scholar

Rosenstock, Manfred 1995, Kontrolle und Harmonisierung nationaler Beihilfen durch die Kommission der Europäischen Gemeinschaften, Frankfurt/M, Lang

Ross, Malcolm 2000, “State Aids and National Courts: Definitions and Other Problems. A Case of Premature Emancipation?,” Common Market Law Review 37(2): 401–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russett, Bruce and O'Neal, John R. 2001, Triangulating Peace. Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organization, New York, W. W. Norton

Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung 1992, Für Wachstumsorientierung – gegen lähmenden Verteilungsstreit, Jahresgutachten 1992/1993, Stuttgart, Metzler-Poeschel

Sack, Jörn 1997, “Von der Geschlossenheit und den Spannungsfeldern in einer Weltordnung des Rechts,” Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 8(21): 650–1Google Scholar

Sand, Inger-Johanne 1998, “Understanding the New Forms of Governance: Mutually Interdependent, Reflexive, Destabilised and Competing Institutions,” European Law Journal 4(2): 271–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sands, Philippe, Mackenzie, Ruth and Shany, Yuval (eds.) 1999, Manual on International Courts and Tribunals, London, Butterworths

Scharpf, Fritz W. 1994, Optionen des Föderalismus in Deutschland und Europa, Frankfurt/M, Campus

Scharpf, Fritz W. 1997, Games Real Actors Play. Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research, Boulder, CO, Westview

Scharpf, Fritz W. 1999, Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?, Oxford University Press

Scharpf, Fritz W., Reissert, Bernd and Schnabel, Fritz 1976, Politikverflechtung: Theorie und Empirie des kooperativen Föderalismus in der Bundesrepublik, Kronberg/Ts, Hain

Scheffler, Dietrich 1993, “Juristische Aspekte der Subventionsproblematik im GATT,” Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft 39(5): 401–9Google Scholar

Schepel, Harm 2003, The Constitution of Private Governance. Product Standards in the Regulation of Integrating Markets. PhD thesis, Florence: European University Institute (forthcoming with Hart Publishing, Oxford)

Schepel, Harm and Rein, Wesseling 1997, “The Legal Community: Judges, Lawyers, Officials and Clerks in the Writing of Europe,” European Law Journal 3(2): 105–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schimmelfennig, Frank 2000, “International Socialization in the New Europe. Rational Action in an Institutional Environment,” European Journal of International Relations 6(1): 109–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schimmelfennig, Frank 2001, “The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union,” International Organization 55(1): 47–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schluchter, Wolfgang 1972, “Aspekte bürokratischer Herrschaft,” in Schluchter, Wolfgang (ed.), Studien zur Interpretation der fortschreitenden Industriegesellschaft (re-edited Frankfurt/M, Suhrkamp 1985), 145–76

Schmalz-Bruns, Rainer 1999, “Deliberativer Supranationalismus. Demokratisches Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates,” Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 6(2): 185–244Google Scholar

Schmid, Christoph 2001, A Theoretical Reconstruction of WTO Constitutionalism and its Implications for the Relationship with the EU, EUI Working Paper Law, 5/2001, Florence, European University Institute

Schmid, Heiko Thorsten 1989, Regionale Wirtschaftsförderung – Schranke des “Modells Baden-Württemberg”? Eine Untersuchung über Gründe und Effekte des Festhaltens an einem umstrittenen Politikbereich, Konstanz, Hartung-Gorre

Schmidt, Helmut 1977, “Verantwortung und Solidarität in Staat und Gesellschaft. Interview des Bundeskanzlers,” Bulletin des Presse- und Informationsamtes der Bundesregierung, 69, 647–51Google Scholar

Schneider, Heinrich 1969, “Zur politischen Theorie der Gemeinschaft,” Integration 2(1): 23–44Google Scholar

Schneider, Jens-Peter 1996, “Konkurrentenklagen als Instrumente der europäischen Beihilfeaufsicht,” Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt 111(22): 1301–9Google Scholar

Scholz, Rupert 1998, “Zum Verhältnis von europäischem Gemeinschaftsrecht und nationalem Verwaltungsverfahrensrecht. Zur Rechtsprechung des EuGH im Fall ‘Alcan’,” Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 51(7): 261–8Google Scholar

Schoppa, Leonard J. 1999, “The Social Context in Coercive International Bargaining,” International Organization 53(2): 307–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schuppert, Gunnar Folkert 1995, “Der bundesstaatliche Finanzausgleich – Status-quo-Denken oder Reformprojekt,” Staatswissenschaften und Staats-praxis 6(4): 675–93Google Scholar

Schütterle, Peter 1994, “Das Interesse der Konkurrenten in der EG-Beihilfenkontrolle nach Art. 92ff. EGV,” Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 5(9): 265–9Google Scholar

Schütterle, Peter 1995, “Die Beihilfenkontrollpraxis der Europäischen Kommission im Spannungsfeld zwischen Recht und Politik,” Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 6(13): 391–6Google Scholar

Schwarze, Jürgen 1996, “Länderbericht Deutschland,” in Schwarze, Jürgen (ed.), Das Verwaltungsrecht unter europäischem Einfluß. Zur Konvergenz der mitgliedstaatlichen Verwaltungsrechtsordnungen in der Europäischen Union, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 123–228

Schwendinger, Gerd 2003, Deutsche Rundfunkgebühren – “staatlich oder aus staatlichen Mitteln gewährt”? Zugleich eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme der Rechtsprechung des EuGH zur staatlichen Zurechenbarkeit von Beihilfen gemäß Art. 87 Abs. 1 EGV, EUI Working Paper Law 05/03, Florence, European University Institute

Sciarra, Silvana 2001, “Integration Through Courts: Article 177 as a Pre-federal Device,” in Sciarra, Silvana (ed), Labour Law in the Courts. National Judges and the European Court of Justice, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 1–30

Scott, Joanne 2000, “Trade and Environment in the EU and WTO,” in Weiler, Joseph H. H. (ed.), The EU, the WTO and the NAFTA: Towards a Common Law of International Trade, Oxford University Press, 125–68

Seeleib-Kaiser, Martin 2001, Globalisierung und Sozialpolitik: Ein Vergleich der Diskurse und Wohlfahrtssysteme in Deutschland, Japan und den USA, Frankfurt/M, Campus

Seidel, Martin 1984, “Grundfragen des Beihilfenaufsichtsrechts der Europäischen Gemeinschaften,” in Börner, Bodo and Neundörfer, Konrad (eds.), Recht und Praxis der Beihilfen im Gemeinsamen Markt, Köln, Heymanns, 55–82

Seidel, Martin 1985, “Aktuelle Rechtsprobleme der Subventionsgewährung und der Beihilfenaufsicht in der Europäischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft,” in Schwarze, Jürgen (ed.), Integrationsrecht. Beiträge zu Recht und Politik der Europäischen Gemeinschaft, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 61–84

Seidel, Martin 1992, “Das Subventionsrecht der Europäischen Gemeinschaften,” Orientierungen zur Wirtschafts- und Gesellschaftspolitik, 51: 25–30Google Scholar

Selznick, Philip 1985, “Focusing Organizational Research on Regulation,” in Noll, Roger G. (ed.), Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences, Berkeley, CA, University of California Press, 363–7

Selznick, Philip 1992, The Moral Commonwealth. Social Theory and the Promise of Community, Berkeley, CA, University of California Press

Senti, Richard 1986, GATT: Allgemeines Zoll- und Handelsabkommen als System der Welthandelsordnung, Zürich, Schulthess

Senti, Richard 2000, WTO – System und Funktionsweise der Welthandelsordnung, Zürich, Schulthess

Sevilla, Christina R. 1997, A Political Economy Model of GATT/WTO Trade Complaints, Harvard Jean Monnet Working Paper 5/97, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University

Shackleton, Michael 1993, “Keynote Article: The Delors II Budget Package,” Journal of Common Market Studies 31, Annual Review, 11–25Google Scholar

Shapiro, Martin and Stone Sweet, Alec 2002, On Law, Politics and Judicialization, Oxford University Press

Siebert, Horst (ed.) 1990, Reforming Capital Income Taxation, Tübingen, Mohr

Siebert, Horst (ed.) 1995, Locational Competition in the World Economy, Tübingen, Mohr

Siebert, Horst 2000, Zum Paradigma des Standortwettbewerbs, Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck

Siedentopf, Heinrich and Ziller, Jacques (eds.) 1988, Making European Policies Work: Implementation of Community Legislation in the Member States, London, Sage

Simitis, Spiros 1987, “Juridification of Labour Relations,” in Teubner, Gunther (ed.), Juridification of Social Spheres, Berlin, de Gruyter, 113–62

Simmons, Beth A. 2000a, “The Legalization of International Monetary Affairs,” International Organization 54(3): 573–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simmons, Beth A. 2000b, Compliance in International Relations, paper prepared for delivery at the 2000 Annual Meeting of the APSA, August 31–September 3, 2000, Washington, DC

Simonis, Heide 1979, “Thesen zu einer Neugestaltung der Subventionspolitik,” Wirtschaftsdienst 59(5): 215–18Google Scholar

Sinnaeve, Adinda 1999, “State Aid Control: Objectives and Procedures,” in Bilal, Sanoussi and Nicolaides, Phedon (eds.), Understanding State Aid Policy in the European Community. Perspectives on Rules and Practice, Maastricht, European Institute of Public Administration, 13–27

Sinnaeve, Adinda 2001, “Die ersten Gruppenfreistellungen: Dezentralisierung der Beihilfenkontrolle?,” Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 12 (3): 69–77Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie 1993, “International Law and International Relations Theory: A Dual Agenda,” American Journal of International Law 87(2): 205–39Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie 1995, “International Law in a World of Liberal States,” European Journal of International Law 6 (4): 503–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie 2001, International Law and International Relations, Hague Academy of International Law: Receuil des Cours 285 (2000), The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff

Slaughter, Anne-Marie and Ratner, Steven R. 1999, “The Method is the Message,” American Journal of International Law 93(2): 410–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Stone Sweet, Alec and Weiler, J. H. H. 1998, The European Court and National Courts – Doctrine and Jurisprudence: Legal Change in its Social Context, Oxford, Hart

Slot, Piet Jan 1990, “Procedural Aspects of State Aids: The Guardian of Competition Versus the Subsidy Villains?”, Common Market Law Review 27 (4): 741–60Google Scholar

Slot, Piet Jan 1999, “EC Policy on State Aid: Are the Procedures ‘User-Friendly’? The Rights of Third Parties,” in Bilal, Sanoussi and Nicolaides, Phedon (eds.), Understanding State Aid Policy in the European Community. Perspectives on Rules and Practice, Maastricht, European Institute of Public Administration, 81–97

Slotboom, Marco M. 2002, “Subsidies in WTO Law and in EC Law: Broad and Narrow Definitions,” Journal of World Trade 36(3): 517–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Jackie, Chatfield, Charles and Pagnucco, Ron (eds.) 1997, Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics: Solidarity Beyond the State, Syracuse University Press

Smith, Mitchell P. 1996, “Integration in Small Steps: The European Commission and Member-State Aid to Industry,” West European Politics 19(3): 563–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Mitchell P. 1998, “Autonomy by the Rules: The European Commission and the Development of State Aid Policy,” Journal of Common Market Studies 36(1): 55–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, Francis 1993, “The Effectiveness of European Community Law: Institutions, Processes, Tools and Techniques,” Modern Law Review 56(1): 19–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, Francis 2003, “The Gatekeepers: The European Courts and WTO Law,” Common Market Law Review 40(3): 313–67Google Scholar

Somogyi, Arpad 1999, Assuring Science Based Decisions – Determining the Appropriate Level of Protection: Threshold of Regulations/Implementation. Conference on International Food Trade Beyond 2000: Science-Based Decisions, Harmonization, Equivalence and Mutual Recognition – Melbourne, Australia, October 11–15, 1999 (http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/health_consumer/library/speeches/speech24_en.html)

Staudt, Erich 1987, “Technologie- und Regionalpolitik der Länder: Vom Leistungs- zum Subventionswettbewerb,” List Forum 14(2): 93–110Google Scholar

Stehn, Jürgen 1996, Subsidies, Countervailing Duties, and the WTO: Towards an Open Subsidy Club, Kieler Diskussionsbeiträge 276, Kiel, Institut für Weltwirtschaft

Stein, Arthur A. 1983, “Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World,” in Krasner, Stephen D. (ed.), International Regimes, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 115–40

Stein, Eric 1981, “Lawyers, Judges, and the Making of a Transnational Constitution,” American Journal of International Law 75(1): 1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steinberg, Richard H. 2002, “In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO,” International Organization 56(2): 339–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevens, Christopher 1996, “EU Policy for the Banana Market: The External Impact of Internal Policies,” in Wallace, Helen and Wallace, William (eds.), Policy-Making in the European Union, Oxford University Press, 325–51

Stone, Alec 1994, “What is a Supranational Constitution? An Essay in International Relations Theory,” Review of Politics 56(3): 441–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stone Sweet, Alec 1997, “The New GATT. Dispute Resolution and the Judicialization of the Trade Regime,” in Volcansek, Mary L. (ed.), Law Above Nations. Supranational Courts and the Legalization of Politics, Gainesville, University of Florida Press, 118–41

Stone Sweet, Alec and Thomas, Brunell 1998, “Constructing a Supranational Constitution. Dispute Resolution and Governance in the European Community,” American Political Science Review 92(1): 63–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stone Sweet, Alec and Caporaso, James 1998, “From Free Trade to Supranational Polity. The European Court and Integration,” in Sandholtz, Wayne and Stone Sweet, Alec (eds.), European Integration and Supranational Governance, Oxford University Press, 92–133

Streeck, Wolfgang 1995, “From Market Making to State Building? Reflections on the Political Economy of European Social Policy,” in Leibfried, Stephan and Pierson, Paul (eds.), European Social Policy. Between Fragmentation and Integration, Washington, DC, Brookings Institution, 389–431

Subak, Susan 1997, “Verifying Compliance with an Unmonitorable Climate Convention,” International Environmental Affairs 9(2): 148–68Google Scholar

Széll, Patrick 1995, “The Development of Multilateral Mechanisms for Monitoring Compliance,” in Lang, Winfried (ed.), Sustainable Development and International Law, London, Graham & Trotman, 97–109

Tallberg, Jonas 1999, Making States Comply. The European Commission, the European Court of Justice and the Enforcement of the Internal Market, Lund, Studentlitteratur

Tallberg, Jonas 2002, “Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management, and the European Union,” International Organization 56(3): 609–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teubner, Gunther 1983, “Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law,” Law and Society Review 17(2): 239–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teubner, Gunther 1987, “Juridification – Concepts, Aspects, Limits, Solutions,” in Teubner, Gunther (ed.), Juridification of Social Spheres, Berlin, de Gruyter, 3–48

Teubner, Gunther 1997, “‘Global Bukowina’: Legal Pluralism in the World Society,” in Teubner, Gunther (ed.), Global Law Without a State, Aldershot, Dartmouth, 3–28

Teubner, Gunther 2000, “Privatregimes: Neo-Spontanes Recht und duale Sozialverfassungen in der Weltgesellschaft?,” in Simon, Dieter and Weiss, Manfred (eds.), Zur Autonomie des Individuums. Liber Amicorum Spiros Simitis, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 437–53

Teubner, Gunther 2004, Netzwerk als Vertragsverbund. Virtuelle Unternehmen, Franchising, Just-in-time in sozialwissenschaftlicher und juristischer Sicht, Baden-Baden, Nomos

Thagesen, Rikke and Matthews, Alan 1997, “The EU's Common Banana Regime: An Initial Evaluation,” Journal of Common Market Studies 35(4): 615–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, Ingo P. 1994, “Finanzausgleich und Kohäsion in der Europäischen Union,” Die Weltwirtschaft 4: 472–91Google Scholar

Thomas, Kenneth P. 2000, Competing for Capital: Europe and North America in a Global Era, Washington, DC, Georgetown University Press

Trachtman, Joel P. 1999, “The Domain of WTO Dispute Resolution,” Harvard International Law Journal 40(2): 333–77Google Scholar

Trachtman, Joel P. and Moremen, Philip M. 2003, “Costs and Benefits of Private Participation in WTO Dispute Settlement: Whose Right Is It Anyway?,” Harvard International Law Journal 44 (1): 221–50Google Scholar

Tsebelis, George 1995, “Decision Making in Political Systems,” British Journal of Political Science 25(3): 289–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyler, Tom R. 1990, Why People Obey the Law, New Haven, Yale University Press

Tyler, Tom R. 1997, “Procedural Fairness and Compliance with the Law,” Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, 133 (2/2), 219–40Google Scholar

Underdal, Arild 1998, “Explaining Compliance and Defection: Three Models,” European Journal of International Relations 4(1): 5–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Underdal, Arild 2002, “One Question, Two Answers,” in Miles, Edward, Underdal, Arild, Andresen, Steinar, Wettestad, Jørgen, Skjærseth, Jon Birger and Carlin, Elaine M. 2002, Explaining Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 3–46

Van Miert, Karel 2000, Markt, Macht, Wettbewerb. Meine Erfahrungen als Kommissar in Brüssel, Stuttgart, Deutsche Verlagsanstalt

Väyrynen, Raimo 1997, “International Stability and Risky States: The Enforcement of Norms,” in Schneider, Gerald and Weitsman, Patricia A. (eds.), Enforcing Cooperation. Risky States and International Management of Conflict, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 37–59

Vermulst, Edwin and Driessen, Bart 1995, “An Overview of the WTO Dispute Settlement System and its Relationship with the Uruguay Round Agreement – Nice on Paper but Too Much Stress for the System?,” Journal of World Trade 29(2): 131–62Google Scholar

Vervaele, John A. (ed.) 1999, Compliance and Enforcement of European Community Law, The Hague, Kluwer Law International

Victor, David G. 2000, “The Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement of the World Trade Organization: An Assessment After Five Years,” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 32(4): 865–937Google Scholar

Victor, David G., Raustiala, Kal and Skolnikoff, Eugene B. 1998, “Introduction and Overview,” in Victor, David G., Raustiala, Kal and Skolnikoff, Eugene B. (eds.), The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1–46

Vogel, David 1997, Trading Up. Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press

Vogel, David and Kessler, Timothy 1998, “How Compliance Happens and Doesn't Happen Domestically,” in Weiss, Edith Brown and Jacobson, Harold K. (eds.), Engaging Countries. Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 19–37

Vogel, Klaus 1965, Der räumliche Anwendungsbereich der Verwaltungsrechtsnorm, Frankfurt/M, Metzner

Voigt, Rüdiger 1999, Globalisierung des Rechts, Baden-Baden, Nomos

Volcansek, Mary L. (ed.) 1997, Law Above Nations: Supranational Courts and the Legalization of Politics, Gainsville, University Press of Florida

Vos, Ellen 2000, “EU Food Safety Regulation in the Aftermath of the BSE Crisis,” Journal of Consumer Policy 23(3): 227–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallace, Helen 1983, “Distributional Politics. Dividing up the Community Cake,” in Wallace, Helen, Wallace, William and Webb, Carole (eds.), Policy-Making in the European Community, Chichester, John Wiley, 81–113

Walter, Christian 1999, “Die Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention als Konstitutionalisierungsprozeß,” Zeitschrift für ausländisches und öffentliches Recht 53(4): 961–81Google Scholar

Walthes, Frank 1996, Europäischer Finanzausgleich, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot

Waltz, Kenneth 1979, Theory of International Politics, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley

Weaver, R. Kent 1986, “The Politics of Blame Avoidance,” Journal of Public Policy 6(4): 371–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, Max 1967, Rechtssoziologie, Neuwied, Luchterhand

Weber, Max 1980, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, Tübingen, Mohr

Weiler, Joseph H. H. 1981, “The Community System: The Dual Character of Supranationalism,” Yearbook of European Law 1: 257–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiler, Joseph H. H. 1988, “The White Paper and the Application of Community Law,” in Bieber, Roland, Dehousse, Renaud, Pinder, John and Weiler, Joseph H. H. (eds.), 1992: One European Market?, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 337–58

Weiler, Joseph H. H. 1991, “The Transformation of Europe,” Yale Law Journal 100(8): 2403–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiler, Joseph H. H. 1993, “Journey to an Unkonown Destination: A Retrospective and Prospective of the European Court of Justice in the Arena of Political Integration,” Journal of Common Market Studies 31(4): 417–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiler, Joseph H. H. 1994, “A Quiet Revolution: The European Court of Justice and its Interlocutors,” Comparative Political Studies 26(4): 510–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiler, Joseph H. H. 1998, “Europe: The Case Against the Case for Statehood,” European Law Journal 4(1): 43–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiler, Joseph H. H. 2000, Federalism and Constitutionalism: Europe's Sonderweg, Harvard Jean Monnet Working Paper 10/00, New York University School of Law

Weiler, J. H. H. 2001, “The Rule of Lawyers and the Ethos of Diplomats: Reflections on the Internal and External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement,” Journal of World Trade 35(2): 191–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiler, J. H. H., Haltern, Ulrich R. and Mayer, Franz C. 1995, “European Democracy and its Critique,” West European Politics 18 (3): 4–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiss, Edith Brown and Jacobson, Harold K. (eds.) 1998, Engaging Countries. Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press

Weitsman, Patricia A. and Schneider, Gerald 1997, “Risky States: Implications for Theory and Policy Making,” in Schneider, Gerald and Weitsman, Patricia A. (eds.), Enforcing Cooperation. Risky States and International Management of Conflict, New York, St. Martin's Press, 283–94

Werksmann, Jacob (ed.) 1996, Greening International Institutions, London, Earthscan

Werner, Georg 1995, Subventionsabbau – gesetzliche Zwänge schaffen. Vorschläge zur Ergänzung des Haushaltsgrundsätzegesetzes zwecks besserer Kontrolle und Kürzung von Subventionen, Wiesbaden, Karl-Bräuer-Institut des Bundes der Steuerzahler

Wesseling, Rein 2000, The Modernisation of EC Antitrust Law, Oxford, Hart

Westlake, Martin 1997, “‘Mad Cows and Englishmen’ – The Institutional Consequences of the BSE Crisis,” Journal of Common Market Studies 35 (Annual review): 11–36Google Scholar

Wettestad, Jorgen 1999, Designing Effective Environmental Regimes. The Key Conditions, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar

Wieacker, Franz 1953, Das Sozialmodell der klassischen Privatrechtsgesetzgeber und die Entwicklung der modernen Gesellschaft, Karlsruhe, C. F. Müller

Wielsch, Dan 2000, Freiheit und Funktion. Zur Struktur- und Theoriegeschichte des Rechts der Wirtschaftsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden, Nomos

Wiethölter, Rudolf 1989, “Proceduralisation of the Category of Law,” in Joerges, Christian and Trubek, David M. (eds.), Critical Legal Thought: An American-German Debate, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 501–10

Wiethölter, Rudolf 1995, “Zur Argumentation im Recht: Entscheidungsfolgen als Rechtsgründe,” in Teubner, Gunther (ed.), Entscheidungsfolgen als Rechtsgründe, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 89–120

Wiethölter, Rudolf 2003, “Recht-Fertigungen eines Gesellschafts-Rechts,” in Joerges, Christian and Teubner, Gunther (eds.), Rechtsverfassungsrecht: Recht-Fertigungen zwischen Sozialtheorie und Privatrechtsdogmatik, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 1–18

Wilson, James Q. and DiJulio, John J. 1995, American Government, Lexington, MA, Heath

Winkler, Roland 1999, “Das ‘Alcan’-Urteil des EuGH – eine Katastrophe für den Rechtsstaat?,” Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 52(4): 148–52Google Scholar

Winter, J. A. 1993, “Supervision of State Aid: Article 93 in the Court of Justice,” Common Market Law Review 30(2): 311–29Google Scholar

Winter, Jan A. 1999, “The Rights of Complainants in State Aid Cases: Judicial Review of Commission Decisions Adopted Under Article 88 (ex 93) EC,” Common Market Law Review 36(3): 521–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1971, Philosophische Untersuchungen, Frankfurt/M, Suhrkamp

Wolf, Klaus Dieter 2000, Die Neue Staatsräson - Zwischenstaatliche Kooperation als Demokratieproblem in der Weltgesellschaft, Baden-Baden, Nomos

Wolters, Christian 1998, Die BSE Krise. Agrarpolitik im Spannungsfeld zwischen Handelsfreiheit und Konsumentenschutz, Frankfurt/M, Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften

Wozniak, Jennifer 1999, The Commission and the Member States. The Evolution of Regional Policy, paper presented at the Sixth Biennial Conference of the ECSA, Pittsburgh, June 2–5, 1999

Young, Oran R. 1979, Compliance and Public Authority: A Theory with International Application, Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press

Young, Oran R. 1999a, Governance in World Affairs, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press

Young, Oran (ed.) 1999b, The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes. Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press

Young, Oran R. and Levy, Marc A. 1999, “The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes,” in Young, Oran (ed.), The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes. Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1–32

Zangl, Bernhard 1999, Interessen auf zwei Ebenen. Internationale Regime in der Agrarhandels-, Währungs- und Walfangpolitik, Baden-Baden, Nomos

Zangl, Bernhard 2001, “Bringing Courts Back In: Normdurchsetzung im GATT, in der WTO und der EG,” Swiss Political Science Review 7(2): 49–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimmermann, Horst 1979, “Vergleichbarkeit in der Subventionsberichterstattung des Bundes,” Finanzarchiv N.F. 37(3): 459–75Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Horst 1990, “Gewichtsverlagerung im föderalen Staatsaufbau unter EG-Einfluß?,” Wirtschaftsdienst 70(9): 451–6Google Scholar

Zippel, Wulfdiether 1993, “Die ordnungspolitischen Probleme von Subventionen und die Beihilferegeln von EGKSV und EWGV,” in Zippel, Wulfdiether (ed.), Ökonomische Grundlagen der europäischen Integration. Eine Einführung in ausgewählte Teilbereiche der Gemeinschaftspolitiken, München, Vahlen, 61–81

Zonnekeyn, Geert A. 2000, “The Status of WTO Law in the EC Legal Order: The Final Curtain?,” Journal of World Trade 34(3): 111–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zuleeg, Manfred 1974, Subventionskontrolle durch Konkurrentenklage, Frankfurt/M, Metzner

Zuleeg, Manfred 1978, “Nationales Subventionsrecht als Wirkungsfeld und Wirkungsfaktor des europäischen Subventionsrechts. Landesbericht Bundesrepublik Deutschland,” in Börner, Bodo and Bullinger, Martin (eds.), Subventionen im Gemeinsamen Markt, Köln, Heymanns, 7–55

Zumbansen, Peer 2000, Ordnungsmuster im modernen Wohlfahrtsstaat. Lernerfahrungen zwischen Staat, Gesellschaft und Vertrag, Baden-Baden, Nomos

Zürn, Michael 1992, Interessen und Institutionen in der internationalen Politik. Grundlegung und Anwendungen des situationsstrukturellen Ansatzes, Opladen, Leske+Budrich

Zürn, Michael 1998, Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates. Denationalisierung und Globalisierung als Chance, Frankfurt/M, Suhrkamp

Zürn, Michael 2000, “Democratic Governance Beyond the Nation-State: The EU and Other International Institutions,” European Journal of International Relations 6(2): 183–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zürn, Michael 2001, “Political Systems in the Postnational Constellation: Societal Denationalization and Multilevel Governance,” in Volker Rittberger (ed.), Global Governance and the United Nations System, Tokyo, United Nations University Press, 48–87

Zürn, Michael 2004, “Global Governance under Legitimacy Pressure,” Government & Opposition (forthcoming)

Zürn, Michael and Wolf, Dieter 1999, “European Law and International Regimes: The Features of Law Beyond the Nation State,” European Law Journal 5(3): 272–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth W. and Duncan, Snidal 2000, “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance,” International Organization 54(3): 421–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth W., Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew, Slaughter, Anne-Marie and Duncan, Snidal 2000, “The Concept of Legalization,” International Organization 54(3): 401– 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abel, Theodore 1948, “The Operation Called Verstehen,” American Journal of Sociology 54(3): 211–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Abromeit, Heidrun 1992, Der verkappte Einheitstaat, Opladen, Leske + Budrich

Abromeit, Heidrun and Schmidt, Thomas 1998, “Grenzprobleme der Demokratie. Konzeptionelle Überlegungen,” in Kohler-Koch, Beate (ed.), Regieren in entgrenzten Räumen (PVS Sonderheft 29), Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 293–320

Adamantopoulos, Konstantinos A. 1988, Das Subventionsrecht des GATT in der EWG, Köln, Heymanns

Alter, Karen J. 1998, “Who Are the ‘Masters of the Treaty’? European Governments and the European Court of Justice,” International Organization 52(1): 121–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Karen J. 2000, “The European Union's Legal System and Domestic Policy: Spillover or Backlash,” International Organization 54(3): 489–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Karen J. 2001, Establishing the Supremacy of European Law. The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe, Oxford University Press

Alter, Karen J. and Sophie, Meunier-Aitsahalia 1994, “Judical Politics in the European Community. European Integration and the Path-Breaking Cassis de Dijon Decision,” Comparative Political Studies 26(4): 535–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Jeffrey J. 1995, “Structural Funds and the Social Dimension of EU Policy: Springboard or Stumbling Block?” in Leibfried, Stephan and Pierson, Paul (eds.), European Social Policy. Between Fragmentation and Integration, Washington, DC, Brookings Institution, 123–58

Applebaum, Richard, Felstiner, William and Gessner, Volkmar (eds.) 2001, Rules and Networks ∔ The Legal Culture of Global Business Transactions, Oxford, Hart

Arbeiterkammer Bremen 1998. Ländervergleich der Betriebsprüfung und Steuerfahndung. Ergebnisse der Untersuchung aus unveröffentlichten Steuerstatistiken, Arbeiterkammer Bremen, unpublished paper (on file with the author)

Arend, Anthony Clark 1996, “Toward an Understanding of International Legal Rules,” in Beck, Robert J., Arend, Anthony Clark and Vander Lugt, Robert D. (eds.), International Rules. Approaches from International Law and International Relations, Oxford University Press, 289–310

Arendt, Hannah 1961, Between Past and Future, New York, Viking Press

Armstrong, Kenneth A. 1998, “Legal Integration: Theorizing the Legal Dimension of European Integration,” Journal of Common Market Studies 36(2): 155–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aspinwall, Mark and Greenwood, Justin 1998, “Conceptualizing Collective Action in the European Union. An Introduction,” in Aspinwall, Mark and Greenwood, Justin (eds.), Collective Action in the European Union. Interests and the New Politics of Associability, London, Routledge, 1–30

Avery, Natalie, Drake, Martine and Lang, Tim 1993, “Internationale Harmonisierung lebensmittelrechtlicher Normen. Eine Studie über die Codex Alimentarius Kommission,” EPD Entwicklungspolitik, Materialien II/93

Axelrod, Robert 1984, The Evolution of Cooperation, New York, Basic Books

Axelrod, Robert and Keohane, Robert O. 1986, “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions,” in Oye, Kenneth A. (ed.), Cooperation under Anarchy, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 226–54

Backes, Peter 1995, “Die neuen Streitbeilegungsregeln der Welthandelsorganisation (WTO). Zu den Auswirkungen im nationalen Recht der USA,” Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft 41(11): 917–19Google Scholar

Baker, Betsy 1992, “Eliciting Non-Party Compliance with Multilateral Environmental Treaties: U.S. Legislation and the Jurisdictional Bases for Compliance Incentives in the Montreal Ozone Protocol,” German Yearbook of International Law 35, 333–65Google Scholar

Becker, Peter 1977, “Politikverflechtung in der Gemeinschaftsaufgabe ‘Verbesserung der regionalen Wirtschaftsstruktur’,” in Scharpf, Fritz W., Reissert, Bernd and Schnabel, Fritz (eds.), Politikverflechtung II. Kritik und Berichte aus der Praxis, Kronberg/Ts, Hain, 29–38

Benz, Arthur and Burkard, Eberlein 1999, “The Europeanization of Regional Policies: Patterns of Multi-Level Governance,” Journal of European Public Policy 6(2): 329–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernauer, Thomas 2000a, “Solving Conflicts of Interest among Governments, Consumers, and Producers I,” Swiss Political Science Review 6(2): 79–99Google Scholar

Bernauer, Thomas 2000b, “Solving Conflicts of Interest among Governments, Consumers, and Producers II,” Swiss Political Science Review 6(3): 85–127Google Scholar

Bilal, Sanoussi and Polmans, Roel 1999, “Is State Aid in Decline? Trends of State Aid to Industry in the Member States of the European Union,” in Bilal, Sanoussi and Nicolaides, Phedon (eds.), Understanding State Aid Policy in the European Community. Perspectives on Rules and Practice, Maastricht, European Institute of Public Administration, 47–80

Black, Julia 1996, “Constitutionalising Self-Regulation,” Modern Law Review 59(1): 24–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bleckmann, Albert 1977, “Die Beihilfenkompetenz der Europäischen Gemeinschaften. Ein Beitrag zum Prinzip der begrenzten Ermächtigung,” Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 30(17): 615–19Google Scholar

Bleckmann, Albert 1984, “Ordnungsrahmen für das Recht der Subventionen. Gutachten D für den 55. Deutschen Juristentag,” Verhandlungen des Deutschen Juristentags 55(1): D1–D115Google Scholar

Bliss, Julia Christine 1987, “GATT Dispute Settlement Reform in the Uruguay Round: Problems and Prospects,” Stanford Journal of International Law 23(1): 31–55Google Scholar

Böckenförde, Ernst 1969, “Entstehung und Wandel des Rechtsstaatsbegriffs,” in Ehmke, Horst (ed.), Festschrift für Adolf Arndt, Frankfurt/M, Europäische Verlagsanstalt, 53–76

Bogdandy, Armin von 1999, Supranationaler Föderalismus als Wirklichkeit und Idee einer neuen Herrschaftsform. Zur Gestalt der Europäischen Union nach Amsterdam, Baden-Baden, Nomos

Böhret, Carl, Jann, Werner and Kronenwett, Eva 1980, “Handlungsspielräume und Steuerungspotential der regionalen Wirtschaftsförderung,” in Bruder, Wolfgang and Ellwein, Thomas (eds.), Raumordnung und staatliche Steuerungsfähigkeit (PVS-Sonderheft 10/1979), Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 76–110

Börzel, Tanja A. 1999, Why There Is No Southern Problem: On Environmental Leaders and Laggards in the European Union, EUI Working Paper, RSC 99/16, Florence, European University Institute

Börzel, Tanja 2000, Private Actors on the Rise? The Role of Non-State Actors in Compliance with International Institutions, Bonn, Max-Planck-Projektgruppe on Common Goods

Börzel, Tanja 2001, “Non-Compliance in the European Union,” Journal of European Public Policy 8(5): 803–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Börzel, Tanja 2002, “Non-State Actors and the Provision of Common Goods. Compliance with International Institutions,” in Hértier, Adrienne (ed.), Common Goods: Reinventing European and International Governance, Lanham, MD, Rowman & Littlefield, 155–78

Boss, Alfred and Rosenschon, Astrid 1998, Subventionen in Deutschland, Kieler Diskussionsbeiträge 320, Kiel, Institut für Weltwirtschaft

Boss, Alfred and Rosenschon, Astrid 2000, Subventionen in Deutschland: eine Aktualisierung, Kieler Diskussionsbeiträge 356, Kiel, Institut für Weltwirtschaft

Boss, Alfred and Rosenschon, Astrid 2002, Subventionen in Deutschland: Quantifizierung und finanzpolitische Bewertung, Kieler Diskussionsbeiträge 392/393, Kiel, Institut für Weltwirtschaft

Bothe, Michael 1996, “The Evaluation of Enforcement Mechanisms in International Environmental Law,” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Enforcing Environmental Standards: Economic Mechanisms as Viable Means?, Berlin, Springer, 13–38

Boyle, Alan E. 1991, “Saving the World? Implementation and Enforcement of International Law Through International Institutions,” Journal of Environmental Law 3(2): 229–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Break, George 1985, “The Tax Expenditure Budget. The Need for a Fuller Accounting,” National Tax Journal 38(3): 261–65Google Scholar

Breuel, Birgit 1988, “Was geschieht zur Subventionsprävention? Niedersächsische Gesetzesinitiativen im Bundesrat,” MIT-Jahrbuch 1988, 43–6

Brösse, Ulrich 1999, Industriepolitik, München, Oldenbourg

Brüggemeier, Gert and Joerges, Christian (eds.) 1984, Workshop zu Konzepten des post-interventionistischen Rechts, Zentrum für Europäische Rechtspolitik, Materialien 4, Bremen, Zentrum für Europäische Rechtspolitik

Bull, Hans Peter 1999, “Finanzausgleich im ‘Wettbewerbsstaat’ – Bemerkungen zur neuen Föderalismustheorie und zu ihrer Bedeutung für den Länderfinanzausgleich,” Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 52(7): 269–81Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley 1977, The Anarchical Society. A Study of Order in World Politics, Basingstoke, Macmillan

Burley, Anne-Marie and Walter, Mattli 1993, “Europe before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration,” International Organization 47(1): 41–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Busch, Marc L. and Reinhardt, Eric 2002, “Testing International Trade Law: Empirical Studies of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement,” in Kennedy, Daniel L. M. and Southwick, James D. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec, New York, Cambridge University Press, 457–81

Caldeira, Gregory A. and Gibson, James L. 1995, “The Legitimacy of the Court of Justice in the European Union: Models of Institutional Support,” American Political Science Review 89(2): 356–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, James 1996, “Compliance, Citizens, and NGOs,” in Cameron, James, Werksman, Jacob and Roderick, Peter (eds.), Improving Compliance with International Environmental Law, London, Earthscan Publications, 29–42

Cameron, James and Campbell, Karen (eds.) 1998, Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organisation, London, Cameron May

Cameron, James, Werksman, Jacob and Roderick, Peter (eds.) 1996, Improving Compliance with International Environmental Law, London, Earthscan Publications

Caporaso, James A. 1996, “The European Union and Forms of State: Westphalian, Regulatory or Post-Modern,” Journal of Common Market Studies 34(1): 29–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caporaso, James 1997, “Does the European Union Represent an N of 1?,” ECSA Review 10(3): 1–5Google Scholar

Caporaso, James A. 2000, “Changes in the Westphalian Order: Territory, Public Authority, and Sovereignty,” International Studies Review 2(2): 1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chalmers, Damien 2003, “‘Food for Thought’: Reconciling European Risks and National Habits,” Modern Law Review 66(4): 532–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I. 1997, “Third Party Dispute Settlement and International Law,” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 36(1): 65–89Google Scholar

Chayes, Abram and Chayes, Antonia Handler 1990, “From Law Enforcement to Dispute Settlement,” International Security 14(2): 147–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chayes, Abram and Chayes, Antonia Handler 1993, “On Compliance,” International Organization 47(2): 175–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chayes, Abram and Chayes, Antonia Handler 1995, The New Sovereignty. Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press

Checkel, Jeffrey T. 1998, “The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory. A Review Essay,” World Politics 50(1): 328–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2001, “Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change,” International Organization 55(3): 553–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christoforou, Theofanis 2003, “The Precautionary Principle and Democratizing Expertise: A European Legal Perspective,” Science and Public Policy 30(3): 205–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Classen, Claus Dieter 1997, “Anmerkung zu EuGH, Rs. C24/95, Urteil vom 20.3.1997,” Juristenzeitung 52(14): 724–6Google Scholar

Cowles, Maria Green, Caporaso, James A. and Risse, Thomas (eds.) 2001, Transforming Europe. Europeanization and Domestic Change, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press

Cummins, Jason G., Harris, Trevor S. and Hassett, Kevin A. 1995, “Accounting Standards, Information Flow, and Firm Investment Behavior,” in Feldstein, Martin, Hines, James R. and Hubbard, R. Glenn (eds.), The Effects of Taxation on Multinational Corporations, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 181–224

Curran, Vivian G. 2003, “Formalism and Anti-Formalism Traditions in French and German Judicial Methodology,” in Joerges, Christian and Ghaleigh, Navraj S. (eds.), Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and its Legal Traditions, Oxford, Hart, 205–28

Curtis, Craig, Thurman, Quint C. and Nice, David C. 1991, “Improving Legal Compliance by Noncoercive Means: Coproducing Order in Washington State,” Social Science Quarterly 72(4): 645–60Google Scholar

Datta, Lois-Ellin and Grasso, Patrick G. (eds.) 1998, Evaluating Tax Expenditures: Tools and Techniques for Assessing Outcomes, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass

De Schutter, Olivier, Lebessis, Notis and Paterson, John (eds.) 2001, Governance in the European Union, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications

Deutsche, Bundesbank 2000, “Die Entwicklung der Subventionen in Deutschland seit Beginn der neunziger Jahre,” Monatsbericht <Deutsche Bundesbank> 52(12): 15–29Google Scholar

Deutscher Bundestag (ed.) 1982, Fragen der Subventionspolitik, “Zur Sache”–Themen parlamentarischer Beratung 3/82, Bonn, Deutscher Bundestag

Di Fabio, Udo 1996, “Gefahr, Vorsorge, Risiko: Die Gefahrenabwehr unter dem Einfluß des Vorsorgeprinzips,” Jura 18(11): 566–74Google Scholar

Doering, Thomas 2003, “German Public Banks Under the Pressure of the EU Subsidy Proceedings,” Intereconomics 38(2): 94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downs, George W., Rocke, David M. and Barsoom, Peter N. 1996, “Is the Good News About Compliance Good News About Cooperation?,” International Organization 50(3): 379–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dryzek, John S. 1990, Discursive Democracy, Cambridge University Press

Dryzek, John S. 1999, “Transnational Democracy,” Journal of Political Philosophy 7(1): 30–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald 1986, Law's Empire, Cambridge, MA, Belknap

Dworkin, Ronald 1991, Taking Law Seriously: New Impressions with a Reply to Critics, London, Duckworth

Easson, Alex 1994, “Integration Through Law: The Court of Justice and the Achievement of the Single Market and the European Union,” in Michelmann, Hans J. and Soldatos, Panayotis (eds.), European Integration: Theories and Approaches, Lanham, MD, University Press of America, 77–97

Ebert, Werner and Steffen, Meyer 1999, “Die Anreizwirkungen des Finanzausgleichs,” Wirtschaftsdienst 79(2): 106–14Google Scholar

Eckert, Dieter 1995, “Die neue Welthandelsordnung und ihre Bedeutung für den internationalen Lebensmittelhandel,” Zeitschrift für das gesamte Lebensmittelrecht 3, 365–93Google Scholar

Eder, Klaus and Kantner, Cathleen 2000, “Transnationale Resonanzstrukturen in Europa. Eine Kritik der Rede vom Öffentlichkeitsdefizit in Europa,” in Bach, Maurizio (ed.), Die Europäisierung nationaler Gesellschaften (Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie – Sonderheft 40), Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 306–31

Eder, Klaus, Hellmann, Kai-Uwe and Trenz, Hans-Jörg 1998, “Regieren in Europa jenseits öffentlicher Legitimation? Eine Untersuchung zur Rolle von politischer Öffentlichkeit in Europa,” in Kohler-Koch, Beate (ed.), Regieren in entgrenzten Räumen (PVS-Sonderheft 29), Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 321–44

Eggers, Barbara 1998, “Die Entscheidung des WTO Appellate Body im Hormonfall. Doch ein Recht auf Vorsorge?,” Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 9(5–6): 147–51Google Scholar

Eick, Christian 1981, “Wirtschaftssubventionen. Anmerkungen zu einer aktuellen Debatte,” Bremer Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik 4(4): 5–43Google Scholar

Eising, Rainer and Kohler-Koch, Beate 1994, “Inflation und Zerfaserung: Trends der Interessenvermittlung in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft,” in Streeck, Wolfgang (ed.), Staat und Verbände (PVS-Sonderheft 25/1994), Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 175–206

Eising, Rainer and Kohler-Koch, Beate 1999, “Governance in the European Union. A Comparative Assessment,” in Kohler-Koch, Beate and Eising, Rainer (eds.), The Transformation of Governance in the European Union, London, Routledge, 266–84

Elias, Norbert 1969, Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation. Soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen, Bern, Francke

Elster, Jon 1992, “Arguing and Bargaining in the Federal Convention and the Assemblée Constituante,” in Malnes, Raino and Underdal, Arild (eds.), Rationality and Institutions. Essays in Honour of Knut Midgaard, Oslo, Universitetsforlaget, 13–50

Elster, Jon 1998a, “Introduction,” in Elster, Jon (ed.), Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge University Press, 1–18

Elster, Jon 1998b, “Deliberation and Constitution Making,” in Elster, Jon (ed.), Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge University Press, 97–122

Engels, Rainer 1996, Die Codex Alimentarius Kommission und der Einsatz von Hormonen in der Tierernährung. Vorsorgeprinzip oder blindes Vertrauen in die Wissenschaft. Form Umwelt & Entwicklung, Bonn, BUND

Eriksen, Erik Oddvar and Fossum, John Erik (eds.) 2000, Democracy in the European Union: Integration Through Deliberation?, London, Routledge

Eriksen, Erik O., Fossum, John E. and Menéndez, Agustín José (eds.) 2003, Developing a Constitution for Europe, London, Routledge

European Parliament 1997, Report by the Temporary Committee of Inquiry Into BSE on Alleged Contraventions or Maladministration in the Implementation of Community Law in Relation to BSE, Without Prejudice to the Jurisdiction of the Community and National Courts, PE 220.544/fin., Luxembourg, Office of Official Publications

European Parliament and European Commission 1999, The European Union and Food Security: Lessons from the BSE Crisis, Luxembourg, Office of Official Publications

Evers, Tilmann 1994, “Supranationale Staatlichkeit am Beispiel der Europäischen Union: Civitas Civitatum oder Monstrum?,” Leviathan 22(1): 115–34Google Scholar

Falke, Josef 1996, “Comitology and other Committees: A Preliminary Empirical Assessment,” in Pedler, Robert H. and Schaefer, Guenther F. (eds), Shaping European Law and Policy. The Role of Committees and Comitology in the Political Process, Maastricht, European Institute of Public Administration, 117–66

Falkenkötter, Thomas 1996, “Der Streit um die sächsischen VW-Beihilfen – Anlaß für grundsätzliche Klärung?,” Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 49(41): 2689–94Google Scholar

Färber, Gisela 1989, “Subventionen in der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft. Subventionsbegriff und Subventionspolitik in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Lichte gewandelter finanzpolitischer Konzeptionen,” in Fischer, Wolfram (ed.), Währungsreform und Soziale Marktwirtschaft. Erfahrungen und Perspektiven nach 40 Jahren (Schriften des Vereins für Socialpolitik N.F. 190), Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 319–43

Färber, Gisela 1995, Binnenmarktgerechte Subventionspolitik in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft. Strukturen, Normen und Defizite, Frankfurt/M, Campus

Färber, Gisela 1996, “Regionen in der Finanzverfassung der Europäischen Union – Probleme und Reformvorschläge,” Steuer und Wirtschaft 73(4): 379–94Google Scholar

Feick, Jürgen 2000, “Wissen, Expertise und regulative Politik: Das Beispiel der Arzneimittelkontrolle,” in Werle, Raymund and Schimank, Uwe (eds.), Gesellschaftliche Komplexität und kollektive Handlungsfähigkeit, Frankfurt/M, Campus, 208–33

Finnemore, Martha 1996, National Interests in International Society, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press

Finnemore, Martha and Toope, Stephen J. 2001, “Comment on Legalization and World Politics,” International Organization 55(3): 743–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraenkel, Ernst 1932, “Die politische Bedeutung des Arbeitsrechts,” in Ramm, Thilo (ed.), Arbeitsrecht und Politik, Neuwied, Luchterhand, 247–60

Franck, Thomas M. 1990, The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations, Oxford University Press

Franck, Thomas M. 1995, Fairness in International Law and Institutions, Oxford, Clarendon Press

Franz, Wolfgang 1992, “Keynesianische Beschäftigungstheorie und Beschäftigungspolitik,” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte B 12/92, 25–31Google Scholar

Franzmeyer, Fritz 1993, “Die Europäische Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion: Ausbau der gemeinschaftlichen Kohäsionspolitik,” Integration 16(2): 95–102Google Scholar

Garrett, Geoffrey 1992, “International Cooperation and Institutional Choice. The European Community's Internal Market,” International Organization 46(2): 533–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garrett, Geoffrey 1995, “The Politics of Legal Integration in the European Union,” International Organization 49(1): 171–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garrett, Geoffrey, Kelemen, R. Daniel and Heiner, Schulz 1998, “The European Court of Justice, National Governments, and Legal Integration in the European Union,” International Organization 52(1): 149–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor 1996, “Democratic States and Commitment in International Relations,” International Organization 50(1): 109–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gawron, Thomas and Ralf, Rogowski 1996, “Effektivität, Implementation und Evaluation. Wirkungsanalyse am Beispiel von Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts,” Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 17(2): 177–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gehring, Thomas 1996, “Arguing und Bargaining in internationalen Verhandlungen. Überlegungen am Beispiel des Ozonschutzregimes,” in Prittwitz, Volker von (ed.), Verhandeln und Argumentieren. Dialog, Interessen und Macht in der Umweltpolitik, Opladen, Leske+Budrich, 207–38

Gehring, Thomas 2002, “Schutzstandards in der WTO? Die schleichende Verknüpfung der Welthandelsordnung mit standardsetzenden internationalen Institutionen,” in Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Knodt, Michèle (eds.), Regieren in internationalen Institutionen, Opladen, Leske + Budrich, 111–39

Gerstenberg, Oliver 1997, Bürgerrechte und Demokratie, Frankfurt/M, Suhrkamp

Gerstenberg, Oliver 2000, “Justification (and Justifiability) of Private Law in a Polycontextual World,” Social and Legal Studies 9(3): 419–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerstenberg, Oliver and Sabel, Charles F. 2002, “Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy, An Institutional Ideal for Europe?,” in Joerges, Christian and Dehousse, Renaud (eds.), Good Governance in Europe's Integrated Market, Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, vol. Ⅺ/2, Oxford University Press, 289–341

Gessner, Volkmar and Budak, Ali Cen 1998, Emerging Legal Certainty: Empirical Studies on the Globalization of Law, Aldershot, Ashgate

Gibson, James L. 1989, “Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance,” Law and Society Review 23(3): 469–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibson, James L. and Gregory, Caldeira A. 1993, “The European Court of Justice: A Question of Legitimacy,” Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 14(2): 204–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibson, James L. and Caldeira, Gregory A. 1998, “Changes in the Legitimacy of the European Court of Justice: A Post-Maastricht Analysis,” British Journal of Political Science 28(1): 63–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giddens, Anthony 1994, Beyond Left and Right. The Future of Radical Politics, Cambridge, Polity Press

Godt, Christine 1998, “Der Bericht des Appellate Body der WTO zum EG-Einfuhrverbot von Hormonfleisch. Risikoregulierung im Weltmarkt,” Europäisches Wirtschafts- und Steuerrecht 9(6): 202–9Google Scholar

Goldstein, Judith 1996, “International Law and Domestic Institutions. Reconciling North American ‘Unfair’ Trade Laws,” International Organization 50(4): 541–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, Judith, Kahler, Miles, Keohane, Robert O. and Anne-Marie, Slaughter 2000, “Introduction: Legalization and World Politics,” International Organization 54(3): 385–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, Judith and Martin, Lisa L. 2000, “Legalization, Trade Liberalization, and Domestic Politics: A Cautionary Note,” International Organization 54(3): 603–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodin, Robert 1988, “What Is So Special About Our Fellow Countrymen?,” Ethics 98(4): 663–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Götz, Volkmar 1984, “Rückforderung von Subventionen,” Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht 3(8): 480–5Google Scholar

Grande, Edgar and Jachtenfuchs, Markus (eds.) 2000, Problemlösungsfähigkeit der Europäischen Union, Baden-Baden, Nomos

Greven, Michael Th. 2000, “Can the European Union Finally Become a Democracy?,” in Greven, Michael Th. and Pauly, Louis W. (eds.), Democracy Beyond the State?, Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield, 35–62

Grieco, Joseph M. 1990, Cooperation Among Nations. Europe, America, and Non-Tariff Barriers to Trade, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press

Griller, Stefan 2000, “Judicial Enforceability of WTO Law in the European Union: Annotation to Case C-149/96, Portugal v. Council,” Journal of International Economic Law 3(3): 441–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Günther, Klaus 1988, Der Sinn für Angemessenheit. Anwendungsdiskurse in Moral und Recht, Frankfurt/M, Suhrkamp

Haas, Peter M. 1998, “Compliance with EU Directives: Insights from International Relations and Comparative Politics,” Journal of European Public Policy 5(1): 17–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haas, Peter M., Keohane, Robert O. and Levy, Marc A. (eds.) 1993, Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press

Habermas, Jürgen 1981, Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Vol. 2, Frankfurt/M, Suhrkamp

Habermas, Jürgen 1985, “Law as Medium and Law as Institution,” in Teubner, Gunther (ed.), Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State, Berlin, de Gruyter, 203–20

Habermas, Jürgen 1994a, Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp

Habermas, Jürgen 1994b, “Über den inneren Zusammenhang von Rechtsstaat und Demokratie,” in Preuß, Ulrich K. (ed.), Zum Begriff der Verfassung, Frankfurt/M, Fischer, 83–94. [= Jürgen Habermas 2001, “Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?,” Political Theory 29(6): 766–81]

Habermas, Jürgen 1997, Die Einbeziehung des Anderen: Studien zur politischen Theorie, Frankfurt/M, Suhrkamp

Habermas, Jürgen 2001, “Remarks on Legitimation through Human Rights,” in Habermas, Jürgen (ed.), The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays, Cambridge, Polity, 113–29

Hall, Peter A. 1989, “Introduction,” in Hall, Peter A. (ed.), The Political Power of Economic Ideas. Keynesianism across Nations, Princeton University Press, 3–26

Hancher, Leigh 1994, “State Aids and Judicial Control in the European Community,” European Competition Law Review 15(3): 134–50Google Scholar

Harlow, Carol 1996, “Francovich and the Problem of the Disobedient State,” European Law Journal 2(3): 199–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, Herbert Lionel Adolphus 1972, The Concept of Law, Oxford, Clarendon

Harzem, Kerstin 1988, Subventionen aus der Sicht der Neuen Politischen Ökonomie, Köln, Deutscher Institut Verlag

Hasenclever, Andreas, Mayer, Peter and Rittberger, Volker 1997, Theories of International Regimes, Cambridge University Press

Hathaway, Oona A. 2002, “Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?,” Yale Law Journal 111(8): 1935–2038CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heinemann, Friedrich 1998, EU-Finanzreform. Eine Synopse der politischen und wissenschaftlichen Diskussion und eine neue Reformkonzeption, Gütersloh, Bertelsmann Stiftung

Heise, Arne, Mülhaupt, Bernd, Seifert, Hartmut, Schäfer, Claus, Störmann, Wiebke and Astrid, Ziegler 1998, “Begutachtung des Wirtschaftsstandorts Deutschland aus einer anderen Sicht,” WSI Mitteilungen 51(6): 393–417Google Scholar

Held, David 1995, Democracy and the Global Order. From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Democracy, Cambridge, Polity Press

Henkin, Louis 1979, How Nations Behave. Law and Foreign Policy, New York, Columbia University Press

Héritier, Adrienne 1996, “The Accommodation of Diversity in European Policy Making and its Outcomes: Regulatory Policy as a Patchwork,” Journal of European Public Policy 3(2): 149–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Héritier, Adrienne, Knill, Christoph and Mingers, Susanne 1996, Ringing the Changes of Europe: Regulatory Competition and the Transformation of the State ∔ Britain, France, Germany, Berlin, de Gruyter

Herwig, Alexia 2004, “Transnational Governance Regimes for Foods Derived From Bio-Technology and Their Legitimacy,” in Joerges, Christian, Sand, Inger-Johanne and Teubner, Gunther (eds.), Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism, Oxford, Hart, 199–222

Hilf, Meinhard 1991, “Settlement of Disputes in International Economic Organizations: Comparative Analysis and Proposals for Strengthening the GATT Dispute Settlement Procedures,” in Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich and Hilf, Meinhard (eds.), The New GATT Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Legal and Economic Problems, Deventer, Kluwer, 285–322

Hilf, Meinhard 2001, “Power, Rules and Principles: Which Orientation for WTO/GATT Law?,” Journal of International Economic Law 4(1): 111–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hilf, Meinhard 2003, “Die Konstitutionalisierung der Welthandelsordnung. Struktur, Institutionen und Verfahren,” Berichte der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Völkerrecht 2003, 257–82Google Scholar

Hilf, Meinhard and Barbara, Eggers 1997, “Der WTO-Panelbericht im EG/USA-Hormonstreit. Anstoß zum grenzenlosen Weltbinnenmarkt oder Eigentor der WTO?,” Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 18, 559–66Google Scholar

Hilf, Meinhard and Matthias, Reuß 1997, “Verfassungsfragen lebensmittelrechtlicher Normierung im europäischen und internationalen Recht,” Zeitschrift für das gesamte Lebensmittelrecht 24(3): 289–302Google Scholar

Hoekman, Bernard M. and Mavroidis, Petros C. 1996, “Policy Externalities and High-Tech Rivalry: Competition and Multilateral Cooperation Beyond the WTO,” Leiden Journal of International Law 9(2): 273–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoekman, Bernard M. and Mavroidis, Petros C. 2000, “WTO Dispute Settlement, Transparency and Surveillance,” World Economy 23(4): 527–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffmann-Riem, Wolfgang and Schmidt-Aßmann, Eberhard (eds.) 1996, Öffentliches Recht und Privatrecht als wechselseitige Auffangordnungen, Baden-Baden, Nomos

Holmes, Oliver W. 1897, “The Path of Law,” Harvard Law Review 10, 458–78Google Scholar

Hooghe, Lisbeth (ed.) 1996, Cohesion Policy and European Integration. Building Multi-level Governance, Oxford University Press

Horn, Norbert 1996, Einführung in die Rechtswissenschaft und Rechtsphilosophie, Heidelberg, C. F. Müller

Howard, Christopher 1995, “Testing the Tools Approach: Tax Expenditures Versus Direct Expenditures,” Public Administration Review 55(5): 439–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard, Christopher 1997, The Hidden Welfare State. Tax Expenditures and Social Policy in the United States, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press

Howse, Robert 1999, “Adjudicative Legitimacy and Treaty Interpretation in International Trade Law: The Early Years of WTO Jurisprudence,” in Weiler, Joseph H. H. (ed.), The EU, the WTO and the NAFTA: Towards a Common Law of International Trade, Oxford University Press, 35–70

Howse, Robert and Nicolaïdis, Kalypso 2001, “Legitimacy and Global Governance: Why Constitutionalizing the WTO Is a Step Too Far,” in Porter, Roger B., Sauve, Pierre, Subramanaian, Arvind and Zampetti, Beviglia (eds.), Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium, Washington, DC, Brookings Institution Press, 227–52

Hrbek, Rudolf 1996, “Eine politische Bewertung der VW-Beihilfen-Kontroverse,” Wirtschaftsdienst 76(10): 506–9Google Scholar

Hübl, Lothar and Legler, Harald 1983, Der Subventionskodex der Länderwirtschaftsminister angewendet auf ausgewählte Finanzhilfen an die gewerbliche Wirtschaft. Gutachten im Auftrag des Niedersächsischen Ministers für Wirtschaft und Verkehr, Hannover, Niedersächsisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung

Hudec, Robert E. 1993, Enforcing International Trade Law. The Evolution of the Modern GATT Legal System, Salem, NH, Butterworth

Hudec, Robert E. 1999, “The New WTO Dispute Settlement Procedure: An Overview of the First Three Years,” Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 8(1): 1–53Google Scholar

Hurd, Ian 1999, “Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics,” International Organization 53(2): 379–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurrell, Andrew 1993, “International Society and the Study of Regimes. A Reflective Approach,” in Rittberger, Volker (ed.), Regime Theory and International Relations, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 49–72

Ikenberry, G. John 1993, “Creating Yesterday's New World Order: Keynes-ian ‘New Thinking’ and the Anglo-American Postwar Settlement,” in Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O. (eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy. Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 57–86

Ipsen, Hans Peter 1972, Europäisches Gemeinschaftsrecht, Tübingen, Mohr

Jachtenfuchs, Markus 2001, “The Governance Approach to European Integration,” Journal of Common Market Studies 39(2): 245–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Kohler-Koch, Beate 1996, “Regieren im dynamischen Mehrebenensystem,” in Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Kohler-Koch, Beate (eds.), Europäische Integration, Opladen, Leske + Budrich, 15–44

Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Kohler-Koch, Beate 2003, “Regieren und Institutionenbildung,” in Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Kohler-Koch, Beate (eds.), Europäische Integration, Opladen, Leske + Budrich, 11–48

Jackson, John H. 1978, “The Jurisprudence of International Trade: The DISC Case in GATT,” American Journal of International Law 72(4): 747–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, John H. 1997, The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press

Jackson, John H. 1998, “Designing and Implementing Effective Dispute Settlement Procedures: WTO Dispute Settlement, Appraisal and Prospects,” in Krueger, Anne O. (ed.), The WTO as an International Organization, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 161–80

Jackson, John H. 1999, The World Trade Organization. Constitution and Jurisprudence, London, Royal Institute of International Affairs

Jackson, John H. 2000, The Jurisprudence of GATT and the WTO. Insights on Treaty Law and Economic Relations, Cambridge University Press

Jacobson, Harold K. and Weiss, Edith Brown 1998a, “A Framework for Analysis,” in Weiss, Edith Brown and Jacobson, Harold K. (eds.), Engaging Countries. Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1–18

Jacobson, Harold K. and Weiss, Edith Brown 1998b, “Assessing the Record and Designing Strategies to Engage Countries,” in Weiss, Edith Brown and Jacobson, Harold K. (eds.), Engaging Countries. Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 511–54

Joerges, Christian 1989, “Politische Rechtstheorie and Critical Legal Studies: Points of Contacts and Divergencies,” in Joerges, Christian and Trubek, David M. (eds.), Critical Legal Thought: An American-German Debate, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 597–643

Joerges, Christian 1994, “Rationalisierungsprozesse im Recht der Produktsicherheit: Öffentliches Recht und Haftungsrecht unter dem Einfluß der Europäischen Integration,” Jahrbuch für Umwelt- und Technikrecht 27, 141–78Google Scholar

Joerges, Christian 1996a, “Taking the Law Seriously: On Political Science and the Role of Law in the Process of European Integration,” European Law Journal 2(2): 105–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joerges, Christian 1996b, The Emergence of Denationalized Governance Structures and the European Court of Justice, Arena Working Paper 16/1996, Oslo, Arena

Joerges, Christian 1997, “Scientific Expertise in Social Regulation and the European Court of Justice: Legal Frameworks for Denationalized Governance Structures,” in Joerges, Christian, Ladeur, Karl-Heinz and Vos, Ellen (eds.), Integrating Scientific Expertise into Regulatory Decision-Making. National Traditions and European Innovations, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 295–324

Joerges, Christian 2000, “Interactive Adjudication in the Europeanisation Process? A Demanding Perspective and a Modest Example,” European Review of Private Law 8(1): 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joerges, Christian 2001, “Law, Science and the Management of Risks to Health at the National, European and International Level. Stories on Baby Dummies, Mad Cows and Hormones in Beef,” Columbia Journal of European Law 7(1): 1–19Google Scholar

Joerges, Christian 2002a, “‘Deliberative Supranationalism’ – Two Defences,” European Law Journal 8(1): 133–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joerges, Christian 2002b, “The Law in the Process of Constitutionalizing Europe,” in Eriksen, Erik O., Fossum, John E. and Menéndez, Agustín J. (eds.), Constitution Making and Democratic Legitimacy, Arena Report 5/2002, Oslo, Arena, 13–48

Joerges, Christian 2003, “Comitology and the European Model? Towards a Recht-Fertigungs-Recht in the Europeanisation Process,” in Neyer, Jürgen et al. (eds.), The Forging of Deliberative Supranationalism in the EU, Arena Report 02/2003, Oslo, Arena, 501–40

Joerges, Christian 2004, “Constitutionalism and Transnational Governance: Exploring a Magic Triangle,” in Joerges, Christian, Sand, Inger-Johanne and Teubner, Gunther (eds.), Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism, Oxford, Hart, 339–75

Joerges, Christian and Falke, Josef (eds.) 2000, Das Ausschußwesen der Europäischen Union. Praxis der Risikoregulierung im Binnenmarkt und ihre rechtliche Verfassung, Baden-Baden, Nomos

Joerges, Christian and Jürgen, Neyer 1997a, “From Intergovernmental Bargaining to Deliberative Political Processes: The Constitutionalisation of Comitology,” European Law Journal 3(3): 273–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joerges, Christian and Jürgen, Neyer 1997b, “Transforming Strategic Interaction into Deliberative Problem-Solving. European Comitology in the Foodstuffs Sector,” Journal of European Public Policy 4(4): 609–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joerges, Christian and Jürgen, Neyer 2003, “Politics, Risk Management, WTO Governance and the Limits of Legalisation,” Science and Public Policy 30(3): 219–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joerges, Christian, Schepel, Harm and Vos, Ellen 1999, The Law's Problems with the Involvement of Non-governmental Actors in Europe's Legislative Process: The Case of Standardisation Under the “New Approach”, EUI Working Paper Law 9/99, Florence, European University Institute

Joerges, Christian and Vos, Ellen (eds.) 1999, European Committees: Social Regulation, Law and Politics, Oxford, Hart

Jönsson, Christer and Jonas, Tallberg 1998, “Compliance and Post-Agreement Bargaining,” European Journal of International Relations 4(4): 371–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahler, Miles 1995, International Institutions and the Political Economy of Integration, Washington, DC, Brookings Institution

Kelemen, R. Daniel 2001, “The Limits of Judicial Power: Trade-Environment Disputes in GATT/WTO and the EU,” Comparative Political Studies 34(6): 622–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelsen, Hans 1966, Principles of International Law, New York, Holt, Rinehart, Winston

Kent, Ann 1995, “China and the International Human Rights Regime. A Case Study of Multilateral Monitoring, 1989–1994,” Human Rights Quarterly 17(1): 1–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keohane, Robert O. 1984, After Hegemony: Collaboration and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton University Press

Keohane, Robert O. 1986, “Reciprocity in International Relations,” International Organization 40(1): 1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keohane, Robert O. 1997, “International Relations and International Law: Two Optics,” Harvard International Law Journal 38(2): 487–502Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew and Anne-Marie, Slaughter 2000, “Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational,” International Organization 54(3): 457–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kesper, Irene 1998, Bundestaatliche Finanzordnung, Grundlagen, Bestand, Reform, Baden-Baden, Nomos

Kielmansegg, Peter Graf 1994, “Läßt sich die Europäische Gemeinschaft demokratisch verfassen?,” Europäische Rundschau 22(2): 23–33Google Scholar

Kielmansegg, Peter Graf 2003, “Integration und Demokratie (mit Nachwort zur 2. Auflage),” in Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Kohler-Koch, Beate (eds.), Europäische Integration, Opladen, Leske + Budrich, 49–83

Kiemmer, Paul 1986, “Die Kontroverse um die Daimler-Benz-Beihilfe,” Wirtschaftsdienst 66(11): 550–4Google Scholar

King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O. and Verba, Sidney 1994, Designing Social Inquiry. Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton University Press

Kiss, Alexandre-Charles 1996, “Compliance with International and European Environmental Obligations,” Hague Yearbook of International Law 9, 45–54Google Scholar

Klein, Eckart 1998, “The Reporting System under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,” in Klein, Eckart (ed.), The Monitoring System of Human Rights Treaty Obligations, Berlin, Berlin-Verlag, 17–30

Knill, Christoph and Andrea, Lenschow 1999, “Neue Konzepte – alte Probleme? Die institutionellen Grenzen effektiver Implementation,” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 40(4): 591–617Google Scholar

Koh, Harold Hongju 1997, “Why Do Nations Obey International Law?,” Yale Law Journal 106(8): 2599–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohler-Koch, Beate 1992, “Interessen und Integration. Die Rolle organisierter Interessen im westeuropäischen Integrationsprozeß,” in Kreile, Michael (ed.), Die Integration Europas (PVS-Sonderheft 23/1992), Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 81–119

Kohler-Koch, Beate 1994, “Changing Patterns of Interest Intermediation in the European Union,” Government & Opposition 29(2): 166–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohler-Koch, Beate 1999, “The Evolution and Transformation of European Governance,” in Kohler-Koch, Beate and Eising, Rainer (eds.), The Transformation of Governance in the European Union, London, Routledge, 14–35

Komuro, Norio 1995, “The WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism – Coverage and Procedures of the WTO Understanding,” Journal of World Trade 29(4): 5–96Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti 2002, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations. The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960, Cambridge University Press

Krasner, Stephen D. (ed.) 1983, International Regimes, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press

Krasner, Stephen D. 1999, Sovereignty. Organized Hypocrisy, Princeton University Press

Kratochwil, Friederich 1989, Rules, Norms, and Decisions. On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs, Cambridge University Press

Krieger-Boden, Christiane and Lammers, Konrad 1996, Subventionsabbau in räumlicher Perspektive: Wirkungszusammenhänge und Schlussfolgerungen, Kieler Diskussionsbeiträge 280, Kiel, Institut für Weltwirtschaft

Krislov, Saul, Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter and Weiler, J. H. H. 1986, “The Political Organs and the Decision-Making Process in the United States and the European Community,” in Cappelletti, Mauro, Seccombe, Monica and Weiler, Joseph H. H. (eds.), Integration through Law. Methods, Tools and Institutions: Political Organs, Integration Techniques and Judicial Process, Berlin, de Gruyter, 3–112

Krüger, Malte 1998, “Kann Industriepolitik die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit verbessern?,” in Donges, Juergen B. and Freytag, Andreas (eds.), Die Rolle des Staates in einer globalisierten Wirtschaft, Stuttgart, Lucius & Lucius, 217–35

Lahnstein, Manfred 1978, “Probleme des kooperativen Föderalismus aus finanzpolitischer Sicht des Bundes,” WSI Mitteilungen 31(8): 434–42Google Scholar

Laird, Sam 1999, “The WTO's Trade Policy Review Mechanism – From Through the Looking Glass,” World Economy 22(2): 741–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lang, Jochen, Naschold, Frieder and Reissert, Bernd 1998, Management der EU-Strukturpolitik, Berlin, Edition Sigma

Lang, Winfried (ed.) 1995, Sustainable Development and International Law, London, Graham & Trotman

Lascher, Edward L. 1996, “Assessing Legislative Deliberation: A Preface to Empirical Analysis,” Legislative Studies Quarterly 21(4): 501–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lasok, K. P. E. 1990, “The Commission's Powers Over Illegal State Aids,” European Competition Law Review 11(3): 125–7Google Scholar

Laursen, Finn and Vanhoonacker, Sophie (eds.) 1992, The Intergovernmental Conference on Political Union, Maastricht, European Institute of Public Administration

Lavdas, Kostas A. and Mendrinou, Maria M. 1999, Politics, Subsidies and Competition. The New Politics of State Intervention in the European Union, Aldershot, Elgar

Lee, Philip and Brian, Kennedy 1996, “The Potential Direct Effect of GATT 1994 in European Community Law,” Journal of World Trade 30(1): 67–89Google Scholar

Leibfried, Stephan and Pierson, Paul (eds.) 1995, European Social Policy. Between Fragmentation and Integration, Washington, DC, Brookings Institution

Levy, Marc A. 1993, “European Acid Rain. The Power of Tote-Board Diplomacy,” in Haas, Peter M., Keohane, Robert O. and Levy, Marc A. (eds.), Institutions for the Earth. Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 75–132

Levy, Marc A., Young, Oran R. and Michael, Zürn 1995, “The Study of International Regimes,” European Journal of International Relations 1(3): 267–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, Jeffrey 1998, The Institutional Problem-Solving Capacities of the Council. The Committee of Permanent Representatives and the Methods of Community, MPIFG Discussion Paper 98/1, Köln, Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung

Liemt, Gijsbert van (ed.) 1992, Industry on the Move: Causes and Consequences of International Relocation in the Manufacturing Industry, Geneva, International Labour Organization

Liese, Andrea 2001, Staaten am Pranger. Zur Wirkung internationaler Regime auf die innerstaatliche Menschenrechtspolitik, PhD thesis, Universität Bremen

Lijphart, Arend 1977, Democracy in Plural Societies. A Comparative Exploration, New Haven, Yale University Press

Lind, E. Allan 1995, “Verfahrensgerechtigkeit und Akzeptanz rechtlicher Autorität,” in Bierbrauer, Günter, Gottwald, Walther and Birnbreier-Stahlberger, Beatrix (eds.), Verfahrensgerechtigkeit. Rechtspsychologische Forschungsbeiträge für die Justizpraxis, Köln, Otto Schmidt, 3–19

Lindberg, Leon N. and Scheingold, Stuart A. 1970, Europe's Would-Be Polity. Patterns of Change in the European Community, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall

Link, Werner 1998, Die Neuordnung der Weltpolitik. Grundprobleme globaler Politik an der Schwelle zum 21. Jahrhundert, München, Beck

Lowi, Theodore 1972, “Four Systems of Policy, Politics and Choice,” Public Administration Review 32(4): 298–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas 1972, Rechtssoziologie 2, Reinbek, Rowohlt

Luhmann, Niklas 1973, Zweckbegriff und Systemrationalität, Frankfurt/M, Suhrkamp

Luhmann, Niklas 1993, Das Recht der Gesellschaft, Frankfurt/M, Suhrkamp

Lukas, Martin 1995, “The Role of Private Parties in the Enforcement of the Uruguay Round Agreements,” Journal of World Trade 29(5): 181–206Google Scholar

Macrory, Richard 1992, “The Enforcement of Community Environmental Laws: Some Critical Issues,” Common Market Law Review 29(2): 347–69Google Scholar

Maduro, M. Poiares 1998, We, the Court. The European Court of Justice and the European Economic Constitution, Oxford, Hart

Majone, Giandomenico 1994, “The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe,” West European Politics 17(3): 77–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico 1998, “Europe's ‘Democratic Deficit’: The Question of Standards,” European Law Journal 4(1): 5–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico 2001, “Nonmajoritarian Institutions and the Limits of Democratic Governance: A Political Transaction-Cost Approach,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 157(1): 57–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico 2002, “What Price Safety? The Precautionary Principle and its Policy Implications,” Journal of Common Market Studies 40(1): 89–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mancini, G. Federico 1991, “The Making of a Constitution for Europe,” in Keohane, Robert O. and Hoffmann, Stanley (eds.), The New European Community. Decisionmaking and Institutional Change, Boulder, CO, Westview, 177–94

Marks, Gary 1992, “Structural Policy in the European Community,” in Sbragia, Alberta M. (ed.), Euro-Politics. Institutions and Policymaking in the “New” European Community, Washington, DC, Brookings Institution, 191–224

Marks, Gary 1997, “Does the European Union Represent an N of 1?,” ECSA Review 10(3): 2–3Google Scholar

Marks, Gary, Scharpf, Fritz W., Schmitter, Philippe C. and Streeck, Wolfgang (eds.) 1996, Governance in the European Union, London, Sage

Martin, Lisa L. 1993, “The Rational State Choice of Multilateralism,” in Ruggie, John Gerard (ed.), Multilateralism Matters. The Theory and Practice of an International Form, New York, Columbia University Press, 91–121

Mattli, Walter and Slaughter, Anne-Marie 1998, “Revisiting the European Court of Justice,” International Organization 52(1): 177–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, Franz C. 2000, Kompetenzüberschreitung und Letztentscheidung. Das Maastricht-Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgrichts und die Letztentscheidung über ultra-vires Konflikte in Mehrebenensystemen. Eine rechtsvergleichende Betrachtung von Konflikten zwischen Gerichten am Beispiel der EU und der USA, München, Beck

Mayntz, Renate (ed.) 1980, Implementation politischer Programme. Empirische Forschungsberichte, Königstein/Ts, Athenäum

McDougal, Myres S., Lasswell, Harold D. and Reisman, W. Michael 1968, “Theories about International Law: Prologue to a Configurative Jurisprudence,” Virginia Journal of International Law 8, 188–299Google Scholar

McGowan, Francis 2000, “Competition Policy: The Limits of the European Regulatory State,” in Wallace, Helen and Wallace, William (eds.), Policy-Making in the European Union, Oxford University Press, 115–47

McLarty, Taunya 1994, “GATT 1994 Dispute Settlement: Sacrificing Diplomacy for Efficiency in the Multilateral Trading System?,” Florida Journal of International Law 9(2): 241–75Google Scholar

Mearsheimer, John 1994, “The False Promise of International Institutions,” International Security 19(3): 5–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mearsheimer, John 2002, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York, W. W. Norton

Mendrinou, Maria 1996, “Non-Compliance and the European Commission's Role in Integration,” Journal of European Public Policy 3(1): 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meng, Werner P. 1990, “The Hormone Conflict Between the EEC and the United States Within the Context of GATT,” Michigan Journal of International Law 11(4): 819–39Google Scholar

Mestmäcker, Ernst-Joachim 1994, “On the Legitimacy of European Law,” Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht 58(4): 615–35Google Scholar