Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T18:36:40.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The American way of war

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2014

Stephanie Carvin
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Michael John Williams
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access

Summary

What is war? War embraces much more than politics … it is always an expression of culture, often a determinate of cultural forces, in some societies the culture itself.

John Keegan, A History of Warfare

The Americans, as a race, are the foremost mechanics in the world. America, as a nation, has the greatest ability for mass production of machines. It therefore behooves us to devise methods of war which exploit our inherent superiority.

General George S. Patton, War As I Knew It

Although the early American officer corps drew on the common canon of writings of great European military leaders when the country fought for independence against the British Crown, and the US military continued to engage with the development of military science in Europe post-independence from Great Britain, the American experience in war in the New World of the North American continent differed from that of the Old World. The American historical experience beyond continental Manifest Destiny reinforced a uniquely American approach to Western warfare. To understand how Americans fight war, it is necessary to understand how Americans view war. This is because how a country conceptualizes and understands war directly impacts how that country instrumentalizes war as a tool of policy.

The particular American preference for decisive, overwhelming conflict becomes apparent when one takes into consideration three factors. First, historically the Western way of war is driven to decisive victory by economic constraints that go back in history to the Greek city-states discussed in the previous chapter. Second, the United States, as a contemporary liberal power, considers war an aberration – thus it views conflict as the suspension of civilized politics to engage in a dirty task that should be accomplished as quickly as possible. Finally, and again historically in line with the Western way of warfare, the democratic nature of the contemporary United States necessitates that wars are fought in a timely matter. Just like in ancient Greece, the public will only fight for a certain amount of time before domestic affairs and political infighting consume attention that was hitherto directed, in a somewhat unified manner, on a common war effort.

Type
Chapter
Information
Law, Science, Liberalism and the American Way of Warfare
The Quest for Humanity in Conflict
, pp. 55 - 87
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Howard, Michael, War and the Liberal Conscience (London: Hurst, 2008), p. 3
Lipset, Seymour Martin, Political Man (London: Mercury Books, 1966), p. 45
Paine, Thomas, Collected Writings, Vol. I (London, 1894), p. 388
Kant, Immanuel, “Towards Perpetual Peace,” in Keingeld, Pauline (ed.), Toward Perpetual Peace and Other Writings on Politics, Peace and History (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2006), p. 74
Huntington, Samuel, The Soldier and the State: The Theory of Politics and Civil–Military Relations (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1957) p. 151
Stuart, Reginald, War and American Thought: From the Revolution to the Monroe Doctrine (Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, 1982)
Gilbert, Felix, To the Farewell Address: Ideas of Early American Foreign Policy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970)
Kennan, George, American Diplomacy: Expanded Edition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984), p. 100
Weigley, Russell, The American Way of War (Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, 1973), p. 281
Tierney, Dominic, How We Fight: Crusades, Quagmires and the American Way of War (New York: Little, Brown & Company, 2010), p. 19
Pocock, J. G. A., “Machiavelli, Harrington and English Political Ideologies in the 18th Century,” William and Mary Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 4 (1965), 560Google Scholar
Douglas, D. and Greenway, G. (eds.), English Historical Documents 1042–1189 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961), p. 945
Beloff, Max, The Age of Absolutism 1660–1815 (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1962)
Clark, Christopher, Iron Kingdom: The Rise and Downfall of Prussia, 1600–1947 (New York: Penguin, 2006), p. 56
Reardon, Carol, Soldiers and Scholars: The US Army and the Uses of Military History (Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1990), pp. 26–27
Pearlman, Michael, Warmaking and American Democracy: The Struggle over Military Strategy 1700–Present (Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1999), p. 188
Hopkins, George E., “Bombing and the American Conscience during World War II,” The Historian, Vol. 28, No. 3 (May 1966), 463Google Scholar
Gacek, Christopher M., The Logic of Force: The Dilemma of Limited War in American Foreign Policy (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994), p. 64
Campbell, David, Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1998)
Mayers, David, Wars and Peace: The Future Americans Envisioned, 1861–1991 (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999), p. 5
Kissinger, Henry, Diplomacy (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1994) p. 402
Cohen, Eliot A., Conquered into Liberty (New York: Free Press, 2011), p. 70
Gray, Colin S., “The American Way of War: Critique and Implications,” in McIvor, Anthony D. (ed.), Rethinking the Principles of War (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2005), p. 28
von Clausewitz, Carl, On War (Howard, Michael and Paret, Peter, trans.) (London: Random House, 1993), p. 605
Buley, Benjamin, The New American Way of War: Military Culture and the Political Utility of Force (London: Routledge, 2008), p. 10
Krepinevich, Andrew F., “Keeping Pace with the Military-Technological Revolution,” Issues in Science and Technology, Vol. 19, No. 4 (1994), p. 24Google Scholar
Mills, Walter, Arms and Men (New York: New American Library, 1963), pp. 102–103
Whal, P. and Toppel, D. R., The Gatling Gun (London: Herbert Jenkins, 1966), p. 18
Chivers, C. J., The Gun (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2010), especially Chapter 1
Segal, Howard P., Technological Utopianism in American Culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985), p. 1
Pursell, Carroll, The Machine in America: A Social History of Technology (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995), pp. 210–211
Franklin, H. Bruce, War Stars: The Superweapon and the American Imagination (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988), p. 72
Smith, P. D., Doomsday Men: The Real Dr. Strangelove and the Dream of the Superweapon (London: Allen Lane, 2007), p. 97
Vagts, A., A History of Militarism (New York: The Free Press, 1967), p. 224
Coker, Christopher, Waging War without Warriors (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2002), p. 54
Heuser, Beatrice, Reading Clausewitz (London: Pimlico, 2002), p. 18
Gray, , “The American Way of War”; Nagl, John A., Learning to Eat Soup with a Knife: Counterinsurgency Lessons from Malaya and Vietnam (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005), Chapter 3
Gat, Azar, A History of Military Thought: From the Enlightenment to the Cold War (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 288–289
Hoffman, George F., Through Mobility We Conquer: The Mechanization of the US Cavalry (Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 2006)
Hoffman, George F. and Starry, Donn A. (eds.), Camp Colt to Desert Storm: The History of US Armored Forces (Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 1999)
Kennedy, David M., Freedom from Fear: The American People in the Depression and War (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 469
van Creveld, Martin, The Culture of War (New York: Presidio, 2009)
Cohen, Eliot A., “The Strategy of Innocence? The United States, 1920–1945,” in Murray, Williamson, Knox, MacGregor and Bernstein, Alvin (eds.), The Making of Strategy: Rulers, States and War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), p. 464
Lewis, W. Lee, “Is Prohibition of Gas Warfare Feasible?”, Atlantic Monthly (June 1922), 840Google Scholar
Whittemore, Jr. Gilbert F., “World War I, Poison Gas Research, and the Ideals of American Chemists,” Social Studies of Science, No. 5 (May 1975), 135–163, p. 158.Google Scholar
Best, Geoffrey, Humanity in Warfare: The Modern History of International Law of Armed Conflicts (London: Methuen & Co. Ltd., 1980), p. 48
Moorehead, Caroline, Dunant’s Dream: War, Switzerland and the History of the Red Cross (London: HarperCollins, 1999), p. 255
Boothby, William H., Weapons and the Law of Armed Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), p. 123
Fentiman, Linda C., “When Smoke Gets in Your Eyes: Proposed Ratification by the United States of the Geneva Protocol on Chemical-Biological Warfare,” Buffalo Law Review, Vol. 24 (1974–1975), 159–188, p. 166Google Scholar
Bunn, George, “Banning Poison Gas and Germ Warfare: Should the United States Agree?”, Wisconsin Law Review, No. 2 (1969), 375–420, p. 377Google Scholar
Bunn, , “The Banning of Poison Gas and Germ Warfare: The U.N. Role,” American Society of International Law Proceedings, Vol. 64 (1970), 194–199Google Scholar
Baxter, R. R. and Buergenthal, Thomas, “Legal Aspects of the Geneva Protocol of 1925,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 64 (1970), 853–879, p. 855, fn. 11Google Scholar
Lansing, Robert to Wilard, Joseph E., January 28, 1918 [850], United States Department of State Papers Relating to Foreign Relations of the United States, 1918, Supplement 2, The World War (Washington D.C.: US Government Printing Office, 1918), pp. 19–21
Carvin, Stephanie, Prisoners of America’s Wars: From the Early Republic to Guantanamo (New York: Columbia University Press, 2010), pp. 85–88
Moore, John Norton, “Ratification of the Geneva Protocol on Gas and Bacteriological Warfare: A Legal and Political Analysis,” Virginia Law Review, Vol. 58, No. 3 (March 1972), 419–509, p. 436Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations (New York: Basic Books, 2000), p. 264

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×