Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-ggqkh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T02:52:17.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2014

Stephanie Carvin  and
Michael John Williams
Stephanie Carvin
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Michael John Williams
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access

Summary

Between annihilation and restraint

If we are to learn from the past then history must first be understood on its own terms. One general point worth emphasizing [is], namely that each society and culture tends to have a unique view of warfare which affects how they fight and as a result how they may be beaten.

Adrian Goldsworthy, The Fall of Carthage

Since its foundation as a republic in the eighteenth century, the United States has faced two broad imperatives: to be an example of liberty to the world and to maintain this role and protect itself by achieving absolute security. How the United States tries to balance these imperatives and the resulting tensions, particularly when it is engaged in armed conflict or perceives an immediate threat, is the purpose of this book.

We argue that the United States has often relied on science, especially applied science, to reconcile these two ends. As Auguste Comte wrote, “from science comes prevision, from prevision comes control.” Taking this maxim to heart, science has been seen as the key to controlling war, allowing the United States to achieve overwhelming and quick military victories, which are nevertheless relatively humane and worthy of its core liberal values. This is a reflection of America’s Enlightenment roots, with its faith in rationality and science to solve complex problems through understanding the natural world.

Type
Chapter
Information
Law, Science, Liberalism and the American Way of Warfare
The Quest for Humanity in Conflict
 , pp. 1 - 20
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

King, Ian T., Social Science and Complexity: The Scientific Foundations (Huntington, NY: Nova Science Publishers, 2000), p. 20Google Scholar
Levy, Jack, “Domestic Politics and War,” The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Vol. 18, No. 4 (Spring 1988), 653–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartner, Sigmund Scott, “The Multiple Effect of Casualties on Public Support for War: An Experimental Approach,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 102, No. 1 (January 2008), 95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, T. Clifton and Campbell, Sally Howard, “Domestic Structure, Decisional Constraints and War: So Why Kant Democracies Fight?, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 35, No. 2 (June 1991), 187–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J., “Assuming the Costs of War: Events, Elites and American Public Support,” Journal of Politics, Vol. 69, No. 4 (November 2007), 975–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D. and Snyder, Jack, “Democratization and the Danger of War,” International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1 (Summer 1995), 5–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A., “Power Pacifists: Democratic States and War,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 86, No. 1 (March 1986), 24–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Clausewitz, Carl, On War (Howard, Michael and Paret, Peter, trans.) (London: Random House, 1993), p. 83Google Scholar
Wright, Quincy, A Study of War (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1942), pp. 5–6Google Scholar
Freedman, Lawrence (ed.), “General Introduction,” in War (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), p. 1
Hanson, Victor Davis, Why the West has Won: Nine Landmark Battles in the Brutal History of Western Victory (New York: Faber and Faber, 2001), p. 20Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society (New York: Columbia University Press, 1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bousquet, Antoine, The Scientific Way of Warfare: Order and Chaos on the Battlefields of Modernity (London: Hurst, 2009)Google Scholar
Coker, Christopher, Warrior Geeks: How 21st Century Technology is Changing the Way we Fight and Think about War (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), p. 41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkins, David and Simeon, Richard, “A Cause in Search of Its Effect, or What Does Political Culture Explain?” Comparative Politics, Vol. 11, No. 2 (1979), 127–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Colin S., “National Style in Strategy: The American Example,” International Security, Vol. 6, No. 2 (Fall 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, David R., “Soviet Strategic Culture,” in Jacobsen, Carl G. (ed.), Strategic Power: USA/USSR (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1990), pp. 35–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Bradley S., “Hegemony and Strategic Culture: American Power Projection and Alliance Defence Politics,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 14, No. 2 (April 1988), 133–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, Andrew M., “On Studying Organizational Cultures,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 4 (Dec. 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pipes, Richard, “Why the Soviet Union Thinks It Could Fight and Win a Nuclear War,” Quadrant, Vol. 21, No. 9 (Sept. 1977)Google Scholar
Schuman, Howard and Johnson, Michael, “Attitudes and Behavior,” Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 2 (1976), available at: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Jack “The Soviet Strategic Culture: Implications for Limited Nuclear Options,” RAND 1977, available at: and “Anarchy and Culture: Insights from the Anthropology of War,” International Organization, Vol. 56, No. 1 (Winter 2002), available at: (all accessed July 1, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Jeremy, War and the Cultural Turn (Cambridge: Polity, 2012), p. 19Google Scholar
Swindler, Ann, “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies,” American Sociological Review, Vol. 51, No. 2 (April 1986), 273–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajjar, Remi M., “Emergent Postmodern US Military Culture,” Armed Forces & Society, Vol. 40, No. 2 (January 2014), p. 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, David, The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change (Cambridge: Blackwell, 1989)Google Scholar
Zalmon, Amy, “Waging the First Postmodern War,” World Policy Journal, Vol. 33, No. 3 (Winter 2006)Google Scholar
Brown-Saracino, Japonica and Ghaziani, Amin, “The Constraints of Culture: Evidence from the Chicago Dyke-March,” Cultural Sociology, Vol. 3, No. 1 (March 2009), 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Patrick, Military Orientalism: Eastern War Through Western Eyes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), p. 19Google Scholar
Kier, Elizabeth, Imagining War: French and British Military Doctrine between the Wars (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997), p. 21Google Scholar
Kahl, Colin H., “In the Crossfire or the Crosshairs? Norms, Civilian Casualties and US Conduct in Iraq,” International Security, Vol. 32, No. 1 (Summer 2007), 7–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvin, Stephanie, Prisoners of America’s Wars: From the Early Republic to Guantanamo (New York: Columbia University Press, 2010), especially Chapter 2Google Scholar
Jochnick, Chris and Normand, Roger, “The Legitimation of Violence: A Critical History of the Laws of War,” Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 35, No. 1 (1994)Google Scholar
“The Legitimation of Violence: A Critical Analysis of the Gulf War,” Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 35, No. 2 (1994)
Berman, Nathaniel, “Privileging Combat? Contemporary Conflict and the Legal Construction of War,” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 43 (2004–2005), 1–71Google Scholar
Smith, Thomas W., “The New Law of War: Legitimizing Hi-Tech and Infrastructural Violence,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 46 (2002), 355–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coker, Christopher, The Future of War (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waging War without Warriors (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2002)
Friedersdorf, Conor, “Eric Holder Explains when Drones Can Kill Americans Abroad,” The Atlantic (March 8, 2012)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Introduction
  • Stephanie Carvin, University of Ottawa, Michael John Williams, New York University
  • Book: Law, Science, Liberalism and the American Way of Warfare
  • Online publication: 05 December 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589704.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Introduction
  • Stephanie Carvin, University of Ottawa, Michael John Williams, New York University
  • Book: Law, Science, Liberalism and the American Way of Warfare
  • Online publication: 05 December 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589704.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Introduction
  • Stephanie Carvin, University of Ottawa, Michael John Williams, New York University
  • Book: Law, Science, Liberalism and the American Way of Warfare
  • Online publication: 05 December 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589704.002
Available formats
×