Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T16:16:48.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Eysenck's demon: biological accounts of personality

from Part II - Below the surface 1: the biological line

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2013

Mark Cook
Affiliation:
University of Wales, Swansea
Get access

Summary

Suppose, said Eysenck, there were a demon ‘sitting near the point where the long pathways of the central nervous system enter into the lower pathways of the brain’. The demon has two levers, one marked ‘excitation’, the other marked ‘inhibition’. ‘Whenever sensory stimuli are coming in through these pathways, he presses sometimes one lever, sometimes the other, sometimes both. Stimuli produced by the levers are then sent on to the brain, where they either facilitate the passage and the interplay of the incoming neural stimuli, or suppress and inhibit them. In part, therefore, the demon acts as a kind of amplifying valve, and part as a suppresser’ (Eysenck, 1965a). And suppose that some demons are right-handed and use the inhibition lever more, while others are left-handed and use the excitation lever more, while the rest use both levers equally frequently.

Eysenck is offering a model of human temperament. His demon's preference for excitation or inhibition lever can:

  • help determine how sociable and impulsive a person is,

  • shape a person's political opinions,

  • turn him/her into a criminal or a good radar operator,

  • make his/her sex life more active and varied.

Temperament theories postulate a bodily base to personality. They are very ancient; the Greek physician Galen, writing in the second century AD, distinguished melancholic, choleric, sanguine and phlegmatic temperaments, which depend on the balance of four humours, or bodily fluids. More recently, Sheldon (1942) argued that physique shapes personality; he distinguished three body types: endomorphic or fat, ectomorphic or tall and thin, and mesomorphic or muscular, which tended to go with jolly, miserable and aggressive personalities respectively. Allport (1937) defined temperament as ‘the characteristic phenomenon of an individual's emotional nature, including his susceptibility to emotional stimulation, his customary strength and speed of response, the quality of his prevailing mood, and all peculiarities of fluctuation and intensity of mood’. Most modern temperament theories, including Eysenck's, look to the brain and nervous system for a physical basis for personality.

Type
Chapter
Information
Levels of Personality , pp. 107 - 144
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borkenau, et al. (2001) describes the German Observation Study of Adult Twins (GOSAT).
Caspi, et al. (2000) uses the Dunedin cohort to report a large-scale follow-up from childhood temperament to adult personality.
Eysenck, (1947) describes his first large-scale factor analytic study of personality.
Eysenck, (1964) gives his account of the relationship between personality and criminal behaviour.
Eysenck, (1967) summarises research on the biological basis of his personality dimensions.
Eysenck, (1971) gives an explanation of the relations between personality and sexual behaviour.
Eysenck, (1979) describes his research on neuroticism and neurosis.
Plomin, and Daniels, (1987) state the Plomin hypothesis that the shared environment accounts for little variance in personality, or other individual differences.
Plomin, et al. (1998) describe the Colorado Adoption Project, which has data on adopted children, their biological mothers, and their adopting mothers.
Rothbart, et al. (2000) give a summary of their approach to researching temperament.
Rowe, (1994) argues that the family is much less important in shaping children than most people suppose.
Shields, (1962) gives an account of a separated identical twin study of personality, and other individual differences, and also gives brief accounts of the environment of each twin.
Thomas, et al. (1963) describe the first major account of temperament in small children.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×