Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-t7r7g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-12T09:06:04.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Legitimacy, accountability and polycentric regulation: dilemmas, trilemmas and organisational response

from PART II - The legitimacy and accountability of actors and standards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2010

By
Julia Black
Edited by
Anne Peters ,
Lucy Koechlin ,
Till Förster  and
Gretta Fenner Zinkernagel
Anne Peters
Affiliation:
Universität Basel, Switzerland
Lucy Koechlin
Affiliation:
Universität Basel, Switzerland
Till Förster
Affiliation:
Universität Basel, Switzerland
Gretta Fenner Zinkernagel
Affiliation:
Universität Basel, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

Introduction

It has been said that governments can ‘puzzle as well as power’. Shamelessly misappropriating this comment, it could be said that academic papers can do the same. Some puzzle their way through an issue, raising more questions than they answer; others ‘power’ on through, setting out the path that others must follow to find a solution to whatever problem is being addressed.

This chapter is of the former type. The issue that it considers is that of the accountability and legitimacy of decentred regulatory regimes. Decentred regulatory regimes are those in which the state is not the sole locus of authority or indeed in which it plays no role at all. They are marked by fragmentation, complexity and interdependence between actors, in which state and non-state actors are both regulators and regulated and their boundaries are marked by the issues or problems with which they are concerned, rather than necessarily by a common solution. Such regimes pose a number of challenges which writers across a range of disciplines – law, political science, international relations, development studies – are all engaged in delineating and addressing. Indeed, the issues to which the ‘governance turn’ is giving rise is drawing commentators like moths round a light.

These challenges include the functional, the systemic, the democratic and the normative. Functional challenges revolve around the problem of coordination: networks of organisations within a regulatory regime are characterised by complex interdependencies and can lack a central locus of authority.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Non-State Actors as Standard Setters , pp. 241 - 269
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baldwin, R. and McCrudden, J. C. 1987, Regulation and Public Law, London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. and Cave, M. 1999, Understanding Regulation, Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Barker, R. 1990, Political Legitimacy and the State, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevan, G. and Hood, C. 2006, ‘What's Measured is What Matters: Targets and Gaming in the English Public Healthcare System’, Public Administration, vol. 84, no. 3, 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. 2001, ‘Decentring Regulation: Understanding the Role of Regulation and Self-Regulation in a “Post-Regulatory” World’, Current Legal Problems, vol. 54, 103–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. 2002, ‘Regulatory Conversations’, Journal of Law and Society, vol. 29, no. 1, 163–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blagescu, M., Casas, L. and Lloyd, R. 2005, Pathways to Accountability: the GAP Framework, London, Global Accountability Partnership, available at www.oneworldtrust.org.Google Scholar
Bovens, M. 2007, ‘Analysing and Assessing Public Accountability: A Conceptual Framework’, European Law Review, vol. 13, no. 4, 447.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. and Drahos, P. 2000, Global Business Regulation, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, V.et al. 1994, ‘Regulatory Styles, Motivational Postures and Nursing Home Compliance’, Law and Policy, vol. 16, no. 16, 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, V. and Reinhart, M. 2007, ‘Taxation Threat, Motivational Postures and Responsive Regulation’, Law and Policy, vol. 29, nos. 1–22, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brignall, S. and Modell, S. 2000, ‘An Institutionalist Perspective on Performance Measurement and Management in the New Public Service’, Management Accounting Research, vol. 11, 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabassi, J. 2004, Renewing our Voice: Code of Good Practice for Responding to HIV/Aids, Geneva, The HIV/AIDS Code of Practice Project, Geneva, available at www.hivcode.org/silo/files/code-of-good-practice.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castells, M. 2000, The Rise of the Network Society: Economy, Society and Culture, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chinkin, C. 2000, Normative Development in the International Legal System in Sheldon, (ed.), 21–42.
Coleman, J. 1998, ‘Incorporationism, Conventionality and the Practical Difference Thesis’, Legal Theory, vol. 4, 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, L. 2005, ‘A Structuration Analysis of Accounting Systems and Systems of Accountability in the Privatized Gas Industry’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, vol. 15, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dent, J. 1991, ‘Accounting and Organizational Reality: A Field Study of the Emergence of a New Organizational Reality’, Accounting Organizations and Society, vol 16, no. 8, 705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. 1991, ‘Introduction’ in Powell, W. and DiMaggio, P. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago University Press, 1–40.Google Scholar
Dubnick, M. 1998, ‘Clarifying Accountability: An Ethical Framework’ in Sampford, C. and Preston, N. (eds.), Public Sector Ethics, Leichhardt/Annadale, Routledge, 68–81.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. 1999, Future Positive: International Co-operation in the 21st Century, London, Earthscan.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. 2000, NGO Rights and Responsibilities: A New Deal for Global Governance, London, Foreign Policy Centre.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. and Hulme, D. (eds.) 1995, Non-Governmental Organisations: Performance and Accountability, London, Earthscan.
Haines, F. and Gurney, D. 2003, ‘The Shadows of the Law: Contemporary Approaches to Regulation and the Problem of Regulatory Conflict’, Law and Policy, vol. 25, no. 4, 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajer, M. 1995, The Politics of Environmental Discourse, Oxford Univeristy Press.Google Scholar
Hall, P. and Soskice, D. 2001, ‘An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism’ in Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford University Press, 1–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlow, C. and Rawlings, R. 2007, ‘Promoting Accountability in Multi-Level Governance: A Network Approach’, European Law Journal, vol. 13, no. 4, 542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heclo, H. 1974, Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hood, C. 2006, ‘Gaming in Targetworld: The Targets Approach to Managing British Public Services’, Public Administration Review, vol. 66, no. 4, 515.Google Scholar
Hood, C.et al. 1999, Regulation Inside Government: Waste-Watchers, Quality Police and Sleaze-Busters, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. 1988, ‘Conclusion: An Institutional Approach to Foreign Economic Policy’ in Ikenberry, G., Lake, D. A. and Mastanduno, M. (eds.), The State and American Foreign Economic Policy, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 219–43.Google Scholar
Jepperson, R. 1991, ‘Institutions, Institutional Effects and Institutionalism’ in Powell, W. and DiMaggio, P. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organisational Analysis, University of Chicago Press, 143–63.Google Scholar
Kagan, R., Gunningham, N. and Thornton, D. 2003, ‘Explaining Corporate Environmental Performance: How Does Regulation Matter?’, Law and Society Review, vol. 37, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, R. and Norton, D. 1992, ‘The Balanced Scorecard – Measures that Drive Performance’, Harvard Business Review, January–February, 71–79.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. 2003, ‘Global Governance and Democratic Accountability’ in Held, D. and Koenig-Archibugi, M. (eds.) Taming Globalization: Frontiers of Governance, London, Polity Press, 130–59.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. and Nye, J. 2001, Power and Interdependence, 3rd edn, New York, Addison-Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Kickert, W., Klijn, E. and Koppenjan, J. (eds.) 1997, Managing Complex Policy Networks, London, Sage.
Klijn, E. and Koppenjan, J. 1995, ‘Public Management and Policy Networks in the Public Sector: A Theoretical Study of Management Strategies in Policy Networks’, Public Administration, vol. 73, no. 3, 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klijn, E. and Koppenjan, J. 2000, ‘Public Management and Policy Networks. Foundations of a Network Approach to Governance’, Public Management, vol. 2, no. 2, 135.Google Scholar
Koppell, J. 2005, ‘Pathologies of Accountability: ICANN and the Challenge of “Multiple Accountability Disorder”’, Public Administration Review, vol. 65, no. 1, 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskienniemi, M. 2007, ‘The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics’, Modern Law Review, vol. 70, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapsley, I. 1996, ‘Reflections on Performance Measurement in the Public Sector’ in Lapsley, I. and Mitchell, F. (eds.), Accounting and Performance Measurement: Issues in the Private and Public Sectors, London, Paul Chapman Publishing, 109–28.Google Scholar
Laughlin, R., Broadbent, J. and Shearn, D. 1992, ‘Recent Financial and Accountability Changes in General Practice: An Unhealthy Intrusion into Medical Autonomy?’, Financial Accountability and Management, vol. 8, 129–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindkvist, L. 1996, ‘Performance Based Compensation in Health Care – A Swedish Experience’, Financial Accountability and Management, vol. 12, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lister, S. 2003, ‘NGO Legitimacy: Technical Issue or Social Construct?’, Critique of Anthropology, vol. 23, no. 2, 175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, N. 1995, Social Systems, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
March, J. and Olsen, J. 1984, ‘The New Institutionalism: Organisational Factors in Political Life’, American Political Science Review, vol. 78, 734–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashaw, J. L. 1983, Bureaucratic Justice: Managing Social Security Disability, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mashaw, J. L. 2007, ‘Accountability and Institutional Design: Some Thoughts on the Grammar of Governance’, Yale Law School Research Paper, no. 116, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=924879.
McBarnet, D., Voiculescu, A. and Campbell, T. (eds.) 2007, The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law, Cambridge University Press.
Meidinger, E. 2007, ‘Competitive Supra-Governmental Regulation: How Could it be Democratic?’, Buffalo Legal Studies Research Paper Series, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1001770.
Meyer, J. and Rowan, B. 1977, ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 83, 340–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J., Boli, J. and Thomas, G. 1994, ‘Ontology and Rationalization in the Western Cultural Account’ in Scott, W., Meyer, J.et al. (eds.), Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism, Thousand Oaks (CA), Sage, 9–27.Google Scholar
Modell, S. 2001, ‘Performance Management and Institutional Processes: A Study of Managerial Responses to Public Sector Reform’, Management Accounting Research, vol. 12, 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, B. 2003, Social Citizenship in the Shadow of Competition, Aldershot, Ashgate.Google Scholar
Mulgan, R. 2000, ‘Accountability: An Ever Expanding Concept?’Public Administration, vol. 78, no. 3, 555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyamugasira, W. 1998, ‘NGOs and Advocacy: How Well Are the Poor Represented?’, Development in Practice, vol. 8, no. 3, 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, S. 1995, ‘Transforming Frameworks of Accountability: The Case of Water Privatization’, Accounting Organizations and Society, vol. 20, no. 2/3, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, C. 1991, ‘Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 16, no. 1, 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Painter-Morland, M. 2006, ‘Redefining Accountability as Relational Responsiveness’, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 66, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulous, Y. 2007, ‘Problems of Democratic Accountability in Multilevel Governance Systems’, European Law Journal, vol. 13, no. 4, 469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, C. 2001, The Open Corporation, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Power, M. 2005, The Risk Management of Everything, London, Demos.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 1979, The Authority of Law, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. 2005, ‘After Government? On Representing Law without the State’, Modern Law Review, vol. 68, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenau, J. and Czempiel, E. O. (eds.) 1992, Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Sadursky, W. 2006, ‘Law's Legitimacy and “Democracy Plus”’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 26, no. 2, 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, V. 1995, ‘The New World Order Incorporated: The Rise of Business and the Decline of the State’, Daedalus, vol. 124, no. 2, 75.Google Scholar
Scott, C. 2000, ‘Accountability in the Regulatory State’, Journal of Law and Society, vol. 23, 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, W. 2001, Institutions and Organisations, 2nd edn, Thousand Oaks (CA), Sage.Google Scholar
Shelton, D. (ed.) 2000, Commitment and Compliance, Oxford University Press.
Sinclair, A. 1995, ‘The Chameleon of Accountability’, Accounting Organizations and Society, vol. 20, 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skelcher, C. 2005, ‘Jurisdictional Integrity, Polycentrism and the Design of Democratic Governance’, Governance, vol. 18, no. 1, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, A. M. 2005, A New World Order, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Slim, H. 2002, ‘By What Authority? The Legitimacy and Accountability of Non-Governmental Organisations’, The International Council on Human Rights Policy International Meeting on Global Trends and Human Rights – Before and After 11 September, Geneva, January 2002 (available at www.jha.ac/articles/a082.htm).
Teubner, G. 1987, ‘Juridification – Concepts, Aspects, Limits, Solutions’ in Teubner, G. (ed.), Juridification of the Social Spheres, Berlin, de Gruyter, 3–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G. 1997, ‘“Global Bukowina”: Legal Pluralism in the World Society’ in Teubner, G. (ed.), Global Law Without a State, Aldershot, Dartmouth, 3–28.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. 1990, Why People Obey the Law: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy and Compliance, New Haven, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. 1997, ‘The Psychology of Legitimacy: A Relational Perspective on Voluntary Deference to Authorities’, Personality & Social Psychology Review, vol. 1, no. 4, 323–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×