Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Figures and Table
- Foreword
- Foreword
- Foreword
- Nomenclature
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Averaging relations
- 3 Phasic conservation equations and interfacial balance equations
- 4 Local volume-averaged conservation equations and interfacial balance equations
- 5 Time averaging of local volume-averaged conservation equations or time-volume-averaged conservation equations and interfacial balance equations
- 6 Time averaging in relation to local volume averaging and time-volume averaging versus volume-time averaging
- 7 Novel porous media formulation for single phase and single phase with multicomponent applications
- 8 Discussion and concluding remarks
- Appendix A
- Appendix B
- Appendix C
- Appendix D
- References
- Index
Appendix C
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 October 2011
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Figures and Table
- Foreword
- Foreword
- Foreword
- Nomenclature
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Averaging relations
- 3 Phasic conservation equations and interfacial balance equations
- 4 Local volume-averaged conservation equations and interfacial balance equations
- 5 Time averaging of local volume-averaged conservation equations or time-volume-averaged conservation equations and interfacial balance equations
- 6 Time averaging in relation to local volume averaging and time-volume averaging versus volume-time averaging
- 7 Novel porous media formulation for single phase and single phase with multicomponent applications
- 8 Discussion and concluding remarks
- Appendix A
- Appendix B
- Appendix C
- Appendix D
- References
- Index
Summary
For a Newtonian fluid, the stress and strain rate of a fluid phase k are linearly related and are expressible as in which all quantities have been previously defined. When the viscosity coefficients λk and μk are dependent on the strain rate, they are decomposed in accordance with Eq. (5.1.8): It is straightforward to demonstrate that Subsequent time averaging gives When λk and μk are independent of velocity gradients, 3i〈λk〉LF = λk, 3i〈μk〉LF = μk, $\tilde {\lambda} _{kLF} = \lambda ^\prime _k = 0$, and $\tilde{\mu}_{kLF} = \mu ^\prime _k = 0$. In addition, ${}^{3i}\langle {\nabla \cdot \underline{\skew3\tilde U}_{ kLF} } \rangle = 0$, ${}^{3i}\langle {\nabla,{\underline{\skew3\tilde U}}_{ kLF} } \rangle = 0$, and ${}^{3i}\langle {( {\nabla,{\underline{\skew3\tilde U}}_{ kLF} } )_c } \rangle = 0$. Consequently, for Newtonian fluids, Eq. (C.4) simplifies to which is precisely the result given in Eq. (5.5.4c).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011