Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-20T15:19:46.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Arthropod pest behavior and IPM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

By
Ronald J. Prokopy  and
Bernard D. Roitberg
Edited by
Marcos Kogan  and
Paul Jepson
Marcos Kogan
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
Paul Jepson
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

An ecological theory can be considered as a general explanation for an ecological phenomenon or pattern of observed ecological tendencies. A well-established ecological theory is usually one constructed upon a foundation of underlying ecological principles and verified hypotheses and may eventually take on the mantle of an ecological law (Lawton, 1999). Because ecology is broad in scope, numerous ecological theories have been generated (Lawton, 1999).

One suite of ecological theory of particular relevance to this chapter on arthropod pest behavior and integrated pest management (IPM) is the suite associated with population dynamics, or the rise and fall of populations over time and space. As interpreted by Lawton (1992), each species or even each population of a species may have its own peculiar dynamics, but essentially this plethora of dynamics can be reduced to variations upon a few common themes. Two key components represented in all such themes are the intrinsic rate of natural increase of the organism and its environment. With exceptions, most arthropod pests, especially pests of agricultural crops, tend to have above-average rates of natural increase (Southwood, 1977; Kennedy and Storer, 2000). Arthropod pests having high intrinsic rates of natural increase from one generation to the next and having several generations per year may become too numerous towards the end of a season for effective management by any single approach, including behavioral manipulation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Perspectives in Ecological Theory and Integrated Pest Management , pp. 87 - 121
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aluja, M. and Boller, E. (1992). Host marking pheromone of Rhagoletis cerasi: field deployment of synthetic pheromone as a novel cherry fruit fly management strategy. Entomologia Experimentalis Applicata, 65, 141–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, W. J. (1991). Searching Behaviour: The Behavioural Ecology of Finding Resources. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Bernays, E. (2000). Plant–Insect Interactions: A Synthesis. Abstract Book I: XXI International Congress of Entomology, Brasilia, Brazil; Bjostad, published at Washington, DC, USA. pp. 8–13.Google Scholar
Bjostad, L. B., Hibbard, B. and Cranshaw, W. (1993). Application of semiochemicals in integrated pest management programs. In Duke, S. D. (ed.), Pest Control with Enhanced Environmental Safety. American Chemical Society. pp. 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boller, E. (1993). Current research on fruit fly host marking pheromones. In Aluja, M. and Liedo, P. (ed.), Fruit Flies: Biology and Management. New York: Springer-Verlag. pp. 195–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borden, J. (1989). Semiochemicals and bark beetle populations: exploitation of natural phenomena by pest management strategists. Holarctic Ecology, 12, 501–10.Google Scholar
Borden, J. (1993). Strategies and tactics for the use of semiochemicals against forest insect pests in North America. In Leonhardt, B. A. and Vaughn, J. L. (eds.), Pest Management: Biologically Based Technologies. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Borden, J. H. (1997). Disruption of semiochemical-mediated aggregation in bark beetles. In Carde, R. T. and Minks, A. K. (eds.), Insect Pheromone Research: New Directions. New York: Chapman & Hall. pp. 421–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borden, J. H., Chong, L. J. and Fuchs, M. C. (1983). Application of semiochemicals in post-logging manipulation of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae. Journal of Economic Entomology, 76, 1428–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. F., Dangler, J. M., Woods, F. M.et al. (1993). Delay in mosaic virus onset and aphid vector reduction in summer squash grown on reflective mulches. Hortscience, 28, 895–6.Google Scholar
Brust, G. E. (2000). Reflective and black mulch increase yield in pumpkins under virus disease pressure. Journal of Economic Entomology, 93, 828–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carde, R. T. and Minks, A. K. (1997). Insect Pheromone Research: New Directions. New York: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, L. D. (1998). Comparison of insecticide bait aerial application methods for management of corn rootworm. Southwestern Entomologist, 23, 147–59.Google Scholar
Chandler, L. D., Coppedge, J. R., Edwards, C. R., Tollefson, J. J. and Wilde, G. E. (2000). Corn rootworm area-wide management across the United States. In Tan, K. H. (ed.), Area-Wide Control of Fruit Flies and Other Insect Pests. Malaysia: Penang, Penerbit Universiti Sains. pp. 159–67.Google Scholar
Cowles, R. S. and Miller, J. R. (1992). Diverting Delia antiqua oviposition with cull onions: field studies on planting depth and a greenhouse test of the stimulo-deterrent concept. Environmental Entomology, 21, 453–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowles, R. S., Miller, J. R., Hollingworth, R. M.et al. (1990). Cinnamyl derivatives and monoterpenoids as nonspecific ovipositional deterrents of the onion fly. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 16, 2401–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronin, J. T., Turchin, P., Hayes, J. L. and Steiner, C. A. (1999). Area-wide efficacy of a localized forest pest management practice. Environmental Entomology, 28, 496–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, R. T., Nakagawa, S., Suda, D. Y. and Urago, T. (1978). Tephritid fruit fly trapping: liquid food baits in high and low rainfall climates. Journal of Economic Entomology, 71, 762–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, R. W. and Chapman, P. J. (1973). Bionomics of the apple maggot in eastern New York. Search Agriculture (Geneva, N. Y.), 3, 1–64.Google Scholar
Dindonis, L. and Miller, J. R. (1981). Host finding responses of onion and seedcorn flies to healthy and decomposing onions and several synthetic constituents of onions. Environmental Entomology, 9, 467–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch, S. and Collier, , , R. H. (2000). Host–plant selection by insects – a theory based on ‘appropriate/inappropriate landings’ by pest insects of cruciferous plants. Entomologia Experimentalis Applicata, 96, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch, S. and Eckenrode, C. J. (1985). Influence of unharvested, cull-pile and volunteer onions on populations of onion maggot. Journal of Economic Entomology, 78, 542–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, S. P. and Harris, M. O. (1997). Behavioral manipulation methods for insect pest management. Annual Review of Entomology, 42, 123–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, D. R. and Borden, J. H. (1989). Containment and concentration of mountain pine beetle infestations with semiochemicals: validation by sampling of baited and surrounding zones. Journal of Economic Entomology, 82, 1399–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, T. A., Prokopy, R. J. and Hosmer, D. W. (1994). Distance of response to host tree models by female apple maggot flies, Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh) (Diptera, Tephritidae) – interaction of visual and olfactory stimuli. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 20, 2393–413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, N. and Brady, J. (1995). Wind structure in relation to odor plumes in tsetse fly habitats. Physiological Entomology, 20, 286–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammack, L. (2001). Single and blended maize volatiles as attractants for diabroticite corn rootworm beetles. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 27, 1373–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardee, D. D. and Mitchell, E. R. (1997). Boll weevil: a summary of research on behavior as affected by chemical communication. Southwestern Entomologist, 22, 466–91.Google Scholar
Hardie, J. and Minks, A. K. (1999). Pheromones of Non-Lepidopteran Insects Associated with Agricultural Plants. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
Hindelang, T. J. and Dascher, P. (1985). The IBM/PC Guide to Marginal Analysis. Wayne, PA: Banbury Books.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, S., Mittenthal, R., Chandler, B.et al. (2002). Influence of odor bait, cultivar type and adjacent habitat composition of performance of perimeter traps for controlling apple maggot flies. Fruit Notes, 67, 20–4.Google Scholar
Hokanen, H. M. T. (1991). Trap cropping in pest management. Annual Review of Entomology, 36, 119–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, A., Clark, C., McNamara, J. and Mangel, M. (1988). Dynamic models in behavioral and evolutionary ecology. Nature, 332, 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, J. F., Cheikh, M., Harris, E. J.et al. (1975). Mediterranean fruit fly: control in Tunisia by strip treatment with a bait spray of technical malathion and protein hydrolysate. Journal of Economic Entomology, 68, 247–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, M. D. and Price, P. W. (1992). Natural variability in plants and animals. In Hunter, M. D., Ohgushi, T. and Price, P. W. (eds.), Effects of Resource Distribution on Animal–Plant Interactions. New York: Academic Press. pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Judd, G. J. R. and Borden, J. H. (1988). Long-range host-finding behavior of the onion fly, Delia antiqua (Diptera, Anthomyiidae) – ecological and physiological constraints. Journal of Applied Ecology, 25, 829–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kareiva, P. (1983). Influence of vegetation texture on herbivore populations: resource concentration and herbivore movement. In Denno, R. F. and McClure, M. S. (eds.), Variable Plants and Herbivores in Natural and Managed Systems. London: Academic Press. pp. 259–89.Google Scholar
Katsoyannos, B. I. (1975). Oviposition-deterring, male-arresting, fruit marking pheromone in Rhagoletis cerasi. Environmental Entomology, 4, 801–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsey, R. G. (1994). Ethanol and ambrosia beetles in Douglas fir logs with and without branches. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 20, 3307–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelsey, R. G. and Joseph, G. (1999). Ethanol and ambrosia beetles in Douglas fir logs exposed or protected from rain. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 25, 2793–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, G. G. and Storer, N. P. (2000). Life systems of polyphagous arthropod pests in temporally unstable cropping systems. Annual Review of Entomology, 45, 467–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, J. S., Booth, C. O. and Kershaw, W. J. S. (1961). Host finding by aphids in the field. III. Visual attraction. Annals of Applied Biology, 49, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogan, M. (1994). Plant resistance in pest management. In Metcalf, R. L. and Luckmann, W. H. (eds.), Introduction to Insect Pest Management. New York: Wiley & Sons. pp. 73–128.Google Scholar
Kring, J. B. (1964). New ways to repel aphids. Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station. Frontiers of Plant Science, 17, 6–7.Google Scholar
Kring, J. B. and Schuster, D. J. (1992). Management of insects on pepper and tomato with UV-reflective mulches. Florida Entomologist, 75, 119–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lance, D. R. (1993). Effects of a nonpheromonal attractant on movement and distribution of adult Diabrotica virgifera. Environmental Entomology, 22, 654–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landis, D. A., Wratten, S. D. and Gurr, G. M. (2000). Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annual Review of Entomology, 45, 175–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawton, J. H. (1992). There are not 10 million kinds of population dynamics. Oikos, 63, 337–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, J. H. (1999). Are there general laws in ecology?Oikos, 84, 177–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leak, G. A. (1999). Tsetse Biology and Ecology. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
Leggett, J. E., Dickerson, W. A. and Lloyd, E. P. (1988). Suppressing low level boll weevil populations with traps: influence of trap placement, grandlure concentration and population level. Southwestern Entomologist, 13, 205–16.Google Scholar
Lima, S. and Zollner, P. A. (1996). Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 131–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindgren, B. S. (1990). Ambrosia beetles. Journal of Forestry, 88, 8–11.Google Scholar
Lindgren, B. S. and Fraser, R. G. (1994). Control of ambrosia beetle damage by mass trapping at a dryland log sorting area in British Columbia. Forestry Chronicle, 70, 159–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, J. A. and Bentz, B. J. (1999). Model analysis of mountain pine beetle personality. Environmental Entomology, 28, 924–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangel, M. (1994). Spatial patterning in resource exploitation and conservation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 343, 93–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangel, M. and Clark, C. W. (1986). Towards a unified foraging theory. Ecology, 67, 1127–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangel, M. and Clark, C. W. (1988). Dynamic Modeling in Behavioral Ecology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mangel, M. and Roitberg, B. D. (1989). Dynamic information and host acceptance by a tephritid fruit fly. Ecological Entomology, 14, 181–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolies, D. C. (1993). Adaptation to spatial variation in habitat: spatial effects inagroecosystems. In Kim, K. C. and McPheron, B. A. (ed.), Evolution of Insect Pests. New York: Wiley & Sons. pp. 129–44.Google Scholar
Martinson, T. E., Nyrop, J. P. and Eckenrode, C. J. (1988). Dispersal of the onion fly and larval damage in rotated onion fields. Journal of Economic Entomology, 81, 508–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClean, J. A. and Borden, J. H. (1977). Suppression of Gnathotrichus sulcatus with sulcatol-baited traps in a commercial sawmill and notes on the occurrence of G. retusus and Trypodendron lineatum. Canadian Journal of Forestry, 7, 348–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQuate, G. T. and Peck, S. L. (2000). Suppression of Mediterranean fruit fly populations over mountainous areas through aerial phloxine B-protein bait sprays: regional medfly program in Guatemala. In Tan, K. H. (ed.), Area-Wide Control of Fruit Flies and Other Insect Pests. Penang, Malaysia: Penerbit Universitati Sains. pp. 409–18.Google Scholar
Miller, J. R. and Cowles, R. S. (1990). Stimulo-deterrent diversion: a concept and its possible application to onion maggot control. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 11, 3197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minkenberg, O. P. J. M., Tatar, M. and Rosenheim, J. A. (1992). Egg load as a major source of variability in insect foraging and oviposition behavior. Oikos, 65, 134–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moericke, V. (1955). Uber das Lebensgewohnheiten der geflugelten Blattlause. Journal of Applied Entomology, 37, 29–91.Google Scholar
Mohammed, A. B. and Ali Niazee, M. T. (1989). Malathion bait sprays for control of apple maggot. Canadian Entomologist, 92, 464–7.Google Scholar
Muzari, M. O. (1999). Odour-baited targets as invasion barriers for tsetse flies: a field trial in Zimbabwe. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 89, 73–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ntiamoah, Y. A., Borden, J. H. and Pierce, H. D. (1996). Identity and bioactivity of oviposition deterrents in pine oil for the onion maggot, Delia antiqua. Entomologia Experimentalis Applicata, 79, 219–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, T. L. and Billings, R. F. (1989). Evaluation of s-verbenone applications for suppressing southern pine beetle infestations. Journal of Economic Entomology, 82, 1702–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, T. L., Billings, R. F., Berisford, C. W.et al. (1992). Disruption of Dendroctonus frontalis infestation with an inhibitor pheromone. Journal of Applied Entomology, 114, 341–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paynter, Q. and Brady, J. (1992). Flight behavior of tsetse flies in thick bush (Glossina pallipides). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 82, 513–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, J. B. and Ellers-Kirk, C. (1999). Overwintering habitat influence on boll weevil trap captures in New Mexico. Southwestern Entomologist, 24, 183–92.Google Scholar
Preissler, H. K. and Mitchell, R. G. (1993). Colonization patterns of the mountain pine beetle in thinned and unthinned lodgepole pine stands. Forest Science, 39, 528–45.Google Scholar
Prokopy, R. J. (1968). Visual responses of apple maggot flies; Rhagoletis pomonella; orchard studies. Entomologia Experimentalis Applicata, 11, 403–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R. J. (1972). Evidence for a marking pheromone deterring repeated oviposition in apple maggot flies. Environmental Entomology, 1, 326–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R. J. and Kogan, M. (2003). Integrated pest management. In Resh, V. H. and Carde, R. T. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Insects, New York: Academic Press. pp. 4–9.Google Scholar
Prokopy, R. J., Bennett, E. W. and Bush, G. L. (1972). Mating behavior in Rhagoletis pomonella. II. Temporal organization. Canadian Entomologist, 104, 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R. J., Papaj, D. R., Hendrichs, J. and Wong, T. T. (1992). Behavioral responses of Ceratitis capitata flies to bait spray droplets and natural food. Entomologia Experimentalis Applicata, 64, 247–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R. J., Cooley, S. S., Prokopy, J. J., Quan, Q. and Buonaccorsi, J. P. (1994). Interactive effects of resource abundance and state of adults on residence of apple maggot flies in host tree patches. Environmental Entomology, 23, 304–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R. J., Mason, J. L., Christie, M. and Wright, S. E. (1996). Arthropod pest and natural enemy abundance under second-level versus first-level integrated pest management practices in apple orchards: a 4-year study. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 57, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R. J., Wright, S. E., Black, J. L., Hu, X. P. and McGuire, M. R. (2000). Attracticidal spheres for controlling apple maggot flies: commercial orchard trials. Entomologia Experimentalis Applicata, 97, 293–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffa, K. F. (2001). Mixed messages across multiple trophic levels: the ecology of bark beetle chemical communication systems. Chemoecology, 11, 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffa, K. F., Phillips, T. W. and Salom, S. M. (1993). Strategies and mechanisms of host colonization by bark beetles. In Schowalter, T. and Filip, G. (eds.), Beetle-Pathogen Interactions in Conifer Forests. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. pp. 102–28.Google Scholar
Reissig, W. H., Fein, B. L. and Roelofs, W. L. (1982). Field tests of synthetic apple volatiles as apple maggot attractants. Environmental Entomology, 11, 1294–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roessler, Y. (1989). Insecticidal bait and cover sprays. In Robinson, A. S. and Hooper, G. (eds.), Fruit Flies: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 329–35.Google Scholar
Roitberg, B. (2004). From parasitoid behaviour to biological control: Applied behavioural ecology. Canadian Entomologist, 136, 289–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roitberg, B. (2000). Threats, flies and protocol gaps. Can behavioral ecology save biological control? In Ives, A. and Hochberg, M. (eds.), Parasite Population Biology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. pp. 254–65.Google Scholar
Roitberg, B., Boivin, G. and Vet, L. (2001). Fitness, parasitoids and biological control. Canadian Entomologist, 133, 429–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roitberg, B. and Mangel, M. (1997). Individuals on the landscape: behavior can mitigate differences among habitats. Oikos, 80, 234–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roitberg, B. D. and Prokopy, R. J. (1983). Host deprivation influence on response of Rhagoletis pomonella to its oviposition-deterring pheromone. Physiological Entomology, 8, 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rull, J. and Prokopy, R. J. (2000). Attraction of apple maggot flies, Rhagoletis pomonella (Diptera: Tephritidae), of different physiological states to odour-baited traps in the presence and absence of food. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 90, 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rull, J. and Prokopy, R. J. (2001). Effect of apple orchard structure on interception of Rhagoletis pomonella flies by odor-baited traps. Canadian Entomologist, 133, 355–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sappington, T. W. and Spurgeon, D. W. (2000). Variation in boll weevil captures in pheromone traps arising from wind speed moderation by brush lines. Environmental Entomology, 29, 807–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. (1977). Habitat, the template for ecological strategies?Journal of Animal Ecology, 46, 337–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spurgeon, D. W., Coppedge, J. B., Raulston, J. R. and Marshall, H. (1999). Mechanisms of boll weevil bait stick activity relative to pheromone traps. Journal of Economic Entomology, 92, 960–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, L. F. (1969). Control and eradication of fruit flies on citrus. Proceedings of First International Citrus Symposium, 2, 881–8.Google Scholar
Strom, B. L., Raton, L. M., Goyer, R. A. and Meeker, J. R. (1999). Visual and semiochemical disruption of host finding in the southern pine beetle. Ecological Applications, 9, 1028–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vale, G. A. (1998). Responses of tsetse flies to vegetation in Zimbabwe: implications for population distribution and bait siting. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 88 (Supplement 1), 1–59.Google Scholar
Vale, G. A., Lovemore, D. F., Flint, S. and Cockbill, G. F. (1988). Odour-baited targets to control tsetse flies, Glossina spp., in Zimbabwe. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 78, 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alphen, J. J. M and Visser, M. E. (1990). Superparasitism as an adaptive strategy for insect parasitoids. Annual Review of Entomology, 35, 59–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VanRanden, E. and Roitberg, B. (1996). Eggload affects superparasitism in the snowberry fly. Entomologia Experimentalis Applicata, 79, 241–5.Google Scholar
Vernon, R. S., Judd, G. J. R., Borden, J. H., Pierce, H. D. and Oehlschalager, A. C. (1981). Attraction of Hylemya antiqua in the field to host-produced oviposition stimulants and their non-host analogues. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 59, 872–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weissling, T. J. and Meinke, L. J. (1991). Semiochemical-insecticide bait placement and vertical distribution of corn rootworm adults: implications for management. Environmental Entomology, 20, 945–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B., Dransfield, R. and Brightwell, R. (1992). The control of tsetse flies in relation to fly movement and trapping efficiency. Journal of Applied Ecology, 29, 163–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuval, B. and Hendrichs, J. (2000). Behavior of flies in the genus Ceratitis. In Aluja, M. and Norrbom, A. L. (eds.), Fruit Flies: Phylogeny and Evolution. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 429–58.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×