Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T22:24:33.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conclusion Tyrannosaurus lex: the anthropology of human rights and transnational law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2011

By
Richard Ashby Wilson
Edited by
Mark Goodale  and
Sally Engle Merry
Richard Ashby Wilson
Affiliation:
Human Rights Institute University of Connecticut
Mark Goodale
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Sally Engle Merry
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

This chapter seeks to complement the emphasis in this volume on the discursive and social aspects of human rights by focusing on their legal character, and how this shapes the responses of local actors who generate innovative discursive and political strategies within a rights paradigm. Law is not the only viable setting for an ethnography of human rights, nevertheless anthropologists need to have better analytical tools for understanding the institutional environment in which rights are generated and enforced. Law is the focal point of studies of human rights in international relations, political science and international law, and anthropologists cannot afford to neglect the legal aspects of human rights, if their insights are going to have a salience beyond the discipline.

The question then becomes, what conceptual ideas can the field of legal anthropology offer to the study of human rights in transnational and domestic law? While the origins of legal anthropology can be traced back to Maine, Morgan, and Marx, the history of the anthropology of human rights in transnational legal processes is relatively recent. Less than twenty years old, the anthropology of transnational law came into its own in the 1990s during an epoch of the rapid globalization of law and the rise of a more robust international human rights legal framework. Anthropologists responded to this resurgence of global humanitarianism by studying a number of its manifestations, from refugee camps to HIV/AIDS clinics to local courts.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Practice of Human Rights
Tracking Law between the Global and the Local
 , pp. 342 - 369
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, Richard. 1995. Politics by Other Means: Law in the Struggle against Apartheid, 1980–1994. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anders, Gerhard. 2005. “The New Global Legal Order as Local Phenomenon: The Special Court for Sierra Leone.” Paper presented at conference on “Developing Anthropology of Law in a Transnational World” held at Edinburgh University, June 9–11, 2005.
Borneman, John. 1997. Settling Accounts: Violence, Justice, and Accountability in Postsocialist Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buur, Lars. 2001. “The South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission: a Technique of Nation-state Formation.” In Hansen, T. B., and Stepputat, F., eds., States of Imagination:Ethnographic Explorations of the Postcolonial State. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chanock, Martin. 1985. Law, Custom and Social Order: The Colonial Experience in Malawi and Zambia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chanock, Martin. 1991. “Paradigms, Policies and Property: a Review of the customary law of land tenure.” In Mann, K., and Roberts, R., eds. Law in Colonial Africa. London: James Currey.Google Scholar
Clarke, Kamari. 2008. Transformations in Sovereignty: the Cultural Politics of Transnational Justice (forthcoming).
Collier, Jane. 1975. “Legal Processes.” Annual Review of Anthropology 4: 121–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dembour, Marie-Bénédicte, and Haslam, Emily. 2004. “Silencing Hearings? Victim-Witnesses at War Crimes Trials.” European Journal of International Law 15: 151–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, E. 1975 [1936]. Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. Trans. W. L. Moll. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Eltringham, Nigel. 2004. Accounting for Horror: Post-genocide Debates in Rwanda. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1983. “Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective.” In Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretative Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2004. “Scientific Objects and Legal Objectivity.” In Pottage, Alain, and Mundy, Martha, eds. Law, Anthropology and the Constitution of the Social: Making Persons and Things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislav. 1926. Crime and Custom in Savage Society. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mamdani, M. 2001. When Victims Become Killers: Colonialism, Nativism and Genocide in Rwanda. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Kristin, and Roberts, Richard, eds. 1991. Law in Colonial Africa. London: James Currey.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 1988. “Legal Pluralism.” Law and Society Review 22(5): 869–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 1992. “Anthropology, Law and Transnational Processes” Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 357–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 1997. “Legal Pluralism and Transnational Culture”. In Wilson, Richard A.. Human Rights, Culture and Context: Anthropological Perspectives. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2003. “Rights Talk and the Experience of the Law: Implementing Women's Human Rights to Protection from Violence.” Human Rights Quarterly 25(2): 343–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2006. “Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism: Mapping the Middle,” American Anthropologist 108(1): 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Sally Falk. 1978. Law as Process: An Anthropological Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moore, Sally Falk. 1986. Social Facts and Fabrications: “Customary” Law on Kilimanjaro, 1880–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Sally Falk. 1991. “From Giving and Lending to Selling: Property Transactions Reflecting Historical Changes on Kilimanjaro.” In Mann, K., and Roberts, R., eds. Law in Colonial Africa. London: James Currey.Google Scholar
Moore, Sally Falk. 2001. “Certainties Undone: Fifty Turbulent Years of Legal Anthropology, 1949–1999.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 7(1): 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Sally Falk. 2005., ed. Law and Anthropology: a Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Riles, Annelise. 2000. The Network Inside Out. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riles, Annelise. 2006. “Anthropology, Human Rights, and Legal Knowledge: Culture in the Iron Cage.” American Anthropologist 108(1): 52–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Fiona C. 2001 “Speech and Silence: Women's Testimony in the First Five Weeks of Public Hearings of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission.” In Das, V., Kleinman, Arthur, Lock, Margaret, Ramphele, Mamphela, and Reynolds, Pamela, eds, Remaking a World: Violence, Suffering and Recovery. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Fiona C. 2002. Bearing Witness: Women and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1968 [1762]. The Social Contract, trans. Maurice Cranston. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Santos, B. de Sousa. 1987. “Law: a Map of Misreading; Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law.' Journal of Law and Society 14: 279–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, B. de Sousa. 1995. Toward a New Common Sense: Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schapera, Isaac. 1938. A Handbook of Tswana Law and Custom. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Speed, Shannon, and Xochitl Leyva. 2008. “Human Rights in Chiapas: Global Discourses, Moral Grammars and Local Meanings.” In Pitarch, Pedro, Speed, Shannon, and Leyva, Xochitl, eds. Human Rights in the Maya Region: Global Politics, Cultural Contentions, and Moral Engagements. Durham, NC: Duke University Press (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, June, and Goodale, Mark, eds., 2002. Practicing Ethnography in Law: New Dialogues, Enduring Methods. New York: Palgrave St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoll, David. 1997. “To Whom Should We Listen? Human Rights Activism in Two Guatemalan Land Disputes.' In Wilson, Richard A., ed. Human Rights, Culture and Context: Anthropological Perspectives. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Stoll, David. 2008. “Human Rights, Land Conflict, and Memories of the Violence in Ixil Country of Northern Quiché.” In Pitarch, Pedro, Speed, Shannon, and Leyva, Xochitl, eds., Human Rights in the Maya Region: Global Politics, Cultural Contentions, and Moral Engagements. Durham, NC: Duke University Press (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian. 1993. “The Folly of the ‘Social Scientific’ Concept of Legal Pluralism.” Journal of Law and Society, 20(2), pp. 192–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian. 2000. “A Non-Essentialist Version of Legal Pluralism.” Journal of Law and Society, 27, pp. 296–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesón, Fernando. 2005. “Liberal Security.” In Wilson, Richard Ashby, ed. Human Rights in the “War on Terror”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touraine, Alain. 1995. Critique of Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Carl, Clausewitz. 1982 [1968]. On War (Penguin Classics. Abridged edn.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Wilson, Richard Ashby. 1997. Human Rights, Culture and Context: Anthropological Perspectives. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Richard Ashby. 2001. The Politics of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Legimitizing the Post-apartheid State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Richard Ashby. 2005. “Judging History: the Historical Record of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia” Human Rights Quarterly, 27(3), pp. 908–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×