Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-02T12:15:26.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Philosophy of science versus scientific practice

Observations on Mach, his followers and his opponents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Get access

Summary

Modern philosophy of science arose from the Vienna Circle and its attempt to reconstruct the rational components of science. It is interesting to compare its approach with that of earlier philosophers, for example Ernst Mach.

Ernst Mach was a scientist. He was an expert in physics, psychology, physiology, the history of science and the general history of ideas. Ernst Mach was also an educated man. He was familiar with the arts and the literature of his time and he was interested in politics. Even when already paralysed he had himself wheeled into a session of parliament to cast his vote in connection with workers' legislation.

Ernst Mach was not satisfied with the science of his time. As he saw it science had become partially petrified. It used entities such as space and time and objective existence but without examining them. Moreover philosophers had tried to show, and scientists had started believing, that these entities could not be examined by science because they were ‘presupposed’ by it. This Mach was not prepared to accept. For him every part of science, ‘presuppositions’ included, was a possible topic of research and subject to correction.

On the other hand it was clear that the correction could not always be carried out by means of the customary procedures, which contained some ideas in a way that protected them from difficulties. It was therefore necessary to introduce a new type of research based on a new cosmology. Mach gave a rough outline of what it would assume and how it would proceed.

Type
Chapter
Information
Problems of Empiricism
Philosophical Papers
, pp. 80 - 88
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×