Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:17:20.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Infant and maternal mortality, interdepartmental conflict, and Newsholme supplanted

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2009

John M. Eyler
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access

Summary

WHY MOTHERS AND BABIES DIE

In the years between 1910 and 1916 Newsholme published five book-length official reports on infant, childhood, and maternal mortality. Collectively these reports represented the most intensive empirical studies of these subjects to date in English. They should be understood historically as part of an ongoing debate about the meaning of death among the very young that took new form with the investigations of national efficiency and physical fitness following the Boer War. As such, these reports had immediate policy intentions. Newsholme was intent not only on demonstrating that recent national initiatives, undertaken in the wake of the Boer War, to promote the health of schoolchildren through school meals, medical examination, and medical treatment should be extended to children of preschool ages, but also on answering eugenists who warned that such ameliorative efforts merely hastened the pace of the nation's physical and mental degeneration.

Newsholme's investigations may have been the most extensive, but they were not the first. Studies of infant mortality had become more common in M.O.H. reports and in medical journals, and several other monographs on infant mortality had appeared in the decade preceding 1916. The General Register Office had taken the lead by drawing attention to the problem long before the Boer War, providing the basic data and a tradition of analysis for these investigations. John Tatham, successor to William Farr and William Ogle at the G.R.O., took a special interest in infant mortality and applied to the problem the sorts of statistical and demographic analyses Farr had pioneered.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×