Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:03:41.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Succeeding waves: Seeking sociolinguistic theory for the twenty-first century

from Part VI - The evolution of sociolinguistic theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2016

By
Allan Bell
Edited by
Nikolas Coupland
Allan Bell
Affiliation:
University of Hong Kong
Nikolas Coupland
Affiliation:
University of Wales College of Cardiff
Get access

Summary

This chapter examines developments in sociolinguistic theory since the 1990s, mainly as they can be traced in the pages of the Journal of Sociolinguistics. First published in 1997, the Journal set itself a theorizing remit from the start, and it has remained committed to that intention. From my perspective as founding co-editor with Nikolas Coupland – and sole editor since 2008, with a team of associate editors – I here review trends in the contents of the Journal, put forward some editorial-insider perspectives derived from reading (to date) more than 2500 submissions across nearly twenty years, and look forward to the future of sociolinguistics.

Three sociolinguistics

Dell Hymes was sociolinguistics’ founding theorist, and any consideration of trends in the field tends to find its way back to his early writings as a means of clarifying where we have come from. In a programmatic essay published more than forty years ago, Hymes distinguished three ways in which (socio)linguistics may view the relationship between the social and the linguistic (1974: 195):

  1. (1) the social as well as the linguistic: addressing social issues which have a language component

  2. (2) socially realistic linguistics: basing linguistic investigation on real-society data

  3. (3) socially constituted linguistics: affirming that language is inherently social and society is inherently linguistic.

The development of sociolinguistics across its more than half a century of history could be seen broadly as a movement from (1) and (2) towards (3), a socially constituted discipline. The way in which language constitutes the social, and the social constitutes language, is now taken as a given in much sociolinguistic work.

The first approach above remains a strong driver in our field – addressing social issues which have a language component. This has always been a goal for sociolinguists of all kinds: to apply their knowledge for the benefit of those they are researching. Often such social intervention has itself been an impetus for conducting the research. Engaged, interventionist research in language maintenance, policy and planning, education, literacy, and other areas (cf. Part 5 of this volume, Chapters 15–17) are staples of sociolinguistic work now, as they were in the 1990s and 1960s.

Type
Chapter
Information
Sociolinguistics
Theoretical Debates
 , pp. 391 - 416
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acton, Eric K., and Potts, Christopher. 2014. That straight talk: Sarah Palin and the sociolinguistics of demonstratives. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18: 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Karen L., and Winter, Anne. 1997. Gang graffiti as a discourse genre. Journal of Sociolinguistics 1: 337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Jannis (ed.). 2006. Sociolinguistics and computer-mediated communication. Theme issue of Journal of Sociolinguistics 10, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. 1981 [1935]. Discourse in the novel. In Bakhtin, M. M., The Dialogic Imagination (ed. Holquist, Michael, trans. Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael). Austin: University of Texas Press, 259–422.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan. 1977. The language of radio news in Auckland: A sociolinguistic study of style, audience and subediting variation. PhD thesis, University of Auckland.
Bell, Allan. 1982. Radio: The style of news language. Journal of Communication 32: 150–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan. 2007. Style in dialogue: Bakhtin and sociolinguistic theory. In Bayley, Robert and Lucas, Ceil (eds.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Theories, Methods and Applications. New York and Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 90–109.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan. 2014. The Guidebook to Sociolinguistics. Malden, MA, and Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan, and Gibson, Andy (eds.). 2011. The sociolinguistics of performance. Theme issue of Journal of Sociolinguistics 15, 5.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan (ed.). 1999. Language Ideological Debates. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budzhak-Jones, Svitlana, and Poplack, Shana. 1997. Two generations, two strategies: The fate of bare English-origin nouns in Ukrainian. Journal of Sociolinguistics 1: 225–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Deborah, Frazer, Elizabeth, Harvey, Penelope, Rampton, M. B. H., and Richardson, Kay. 1992. Researching Language: Issues of Power and Method. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Carter, Bob, and Sealey, Alison. 2000. Language, structure and agency: What can realist social theory offer to sociolinguistics?Journal of Sociolinguistics 4: 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 1984. Accommodation at work: Some phonological data and their implications. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46: 49–70.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas (ed.). 2003. Sociolinguistics and globalisation. Theme issue ofJournal of Sociolinguistics 7, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2007. Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas, Sarangi, Srikant, and Candlin, Christopher N. (eds.). 2001. Sociolinguistics and Social Theory. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
D'Arcy, Alexandra, and Young, Taylor Marie. 2012. Ethics and social media: Implications for sociolinguistics in the networked public. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16: 532–546.Google Scholar
Divita, David. 2012. Online in later life: Age as a chronological fact and a dynamic social category in an Internet class for retirees. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16: 585–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, Sylvie, and Melançon, Megan. 1997. Cajun is dead – Long live Cajun: Shifting from a linguistic to a cultural community. Journal of Sociolinguistics 1: 63–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity in Belten High. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope, and Wenger, Etienne. 2005. What is the role of power in sociolinguistic variation?Journal of Sociolinguistics 9: 582–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin‑Tripp, Susan M. 1972. On sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co‑occurrence. In Gumperz, John J. and Hymes, Dell (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 213–250.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2000. Discourse, social theory, and social research: The discourse of welfare reform. Journal of Sociolinguistics 4: 163–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, Susan, and Woolard, Kathryn A. (eds.). 2001. Languages and Publics: The Making of Authority. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard, and Powesland, Peter F.. 1975. Speech Style and Social Evaluation. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heller, Monica. 1999. Ebonics, language revival, la qualité de la langue and more: What do we have to say about the language debates of our time?Journal of Sociolinguistics 3: 260–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, Monica, Pujolar, Joan, and Duchêne, Alexandre. 2014. Linguistic commodification in tourism. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18: 539–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesson, Ashley. 2014. Medically speaking: Mandative adjective extraposition in physician speech. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18: 289–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindle, Donald M, 1979. The social and situational conditioning of phonetic variation. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Hymes, Dell. 1974. Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1996. Ethnography, Linguistics, Narrative Inequality: Toward an Understanding of Voice. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T., and Gal, Susan. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, Paul V. (ed.), Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities. Sante Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, 35–83.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, Thurlow, Crispin, and Heller, Monica (eds.). 2014. Sociolinguistics and tourism. Theme issue of Journal of Sociolinguistics 18, 4.Google Scholar
Jones, Rodney H. 1997. Marketing the damaged self: The construction of identity in advertisements directed towards people with HIV/AIDS. Journal of Sociolinguistics 1: 393–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiesling, Scott Fabius. 1998. Men's identities and sociolinguistic variation: The case of fraternity men. Journal of Sociolinguistics 2: 69–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore. 2011. Attitudes, ideology and awareness. In Wodak, Ruth, Johnstone, Barbara, and Kerswill, Paul (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Sociolinguistics. London: Sage, 265–278.Google Scholar
Kroskrity, Paul V. (ed.). 2000. Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities. Sante Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change, vol. 2: Social Factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2006 [1966]. The Social Stratification of English in New York City, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, Adrienne, and Park, Joseph Sung-Yul. 2012. Globalization, multilingualism and identity in transnational perspective: The case of South Korea. Theme issue of Journal of Sociolinguistics 16, 2.Google Scholar
Marriott, Stephanie. 1997. Dialect and dialectic in a British war film. Journal of Sociolinguistics 1: 173–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, James. 1992. The theoretical status of sociolinguistics. In Bolton, Kingsley and Kwok, Helen (eds.), Sociolinguistics Today: International Perspectives. London and New York: Routledge, 356–360.Google Scholar
Milroy, James. 2001. Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5: 530–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. 2002. Introduction: Mobility, contact and language change – Working with contemporary speech communities. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6: 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rampton, Ben. 1999. Styling the other. Theme issue of Journal of Sociolinguistics 3–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, John R. 1999. The Ebonics controversy in my backyard: A sociolinguist's experiences and reflections. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3: 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, John, and Price, Mackenzie. 2013. Girlz II women: Age-grading, language change and stylistic variation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17: 143–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, Ron. 1997. Handbills, tissues, and condoms: A site of engagement for the construction of identity in public discourse. Journal of Sociolinguistics 1: 39–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sealey, Alison, and Carter, Bob. 2004. Applied Linguistics as Social Science. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Seargeant, Philip, Tagg, Caroline, and Ngampramuan, Wipapan. 2012. Language choice and addressivity strategies in Thai-English social network interactions. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16: 510–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi B., Woolard, Kathryn A., and Kroskrity, Paul V. (eds.). 1998. Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Bal Krishna. 2012. Beyond social networking: Performing global Englishes in Facebook by college youth in Nepal. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16: 483–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1979. Language structure and linguistic ideology. In Clyne, Paul R., Hanks, William F., and Hofbauer, Carol L., The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society, 193–247.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1981. Linguistic accommodation: Sociolinguistic observations on a sociopsychological theory. In Masek, C. S., Hendrick, R. A., and Miller, M. F. (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society, 218–237.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2004. New-Dialect Formation: The Inevitability of Colonial Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter, Gordon, Elizabeth, and Lewis, Gillian. 1998. New-dialect formation and Southern Hemisphere English: The New Zealand short front vowels. Journal of Sociolinguistics 2: 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Velde, Hans, van Hout, Roeland, and Gerritsen, Marinel. 1997. Watching Dutch change: A real time study of variation and change in standard Dutch pronunciation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 1: 361–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, Hazen, Kirk, and Tamburro, Jennifer Ruff. 1997. Isolation within isolation: A solitary century of African-American Vernacular English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 1: 7–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, Nicola J. 1997. The formation and development of New Zealand English: Interaction of gender-related variation and linguistic change. Journal of Sociolinguistics 1: 95–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn A. 1985. Language variation and cultural hegemony: Toward an integration of sociolinguistic and social theory. American Ethnologist 12: 738–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn A. 1998. Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In Schieffelin, Bambi B., Woolard, Kathryn A., and Kroskrity, Paul V. (eds.), Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 3–47.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×