Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface to the new edition
- Preface
- 1 Societies as organized power networks
- 2 The end of general social evolution: how prehistoric peoples evaded power
- 3 The emergence of stratification, states, and multi-power-actor civilization in Mesopotamia
- 4 A comparative analysis of the emergence of stratification, states, and multi-power-actor civilizations
- 5 The first empires of domination: the dialectics of compulsory cooperation
- 6 “Indo-Europeans” and iron: expanding, diversified power networks
- 7 Phoenicians and Greeks: decentralized multi-power-actor civilizations
- 8 Revitalized empires of domination: Assyria and Persia
- 9 The Roman territorial empire
- 10 Ideology transcendent: the Christian ecumene
- 11 A comparative excursus into the world religions: Confucianism, Islam, and (especially) Hindu caste
- 12 The European dynamic: I. The intensive phase, a.d. 800–1155
- 13 The European dynamic: II. The rise of coordinating states, 1155–1477
- 14 The European dynamic: III. International capitalism and organic national states, 1477–1760
- 15 European conclusions: explaining European dynamism – capitalism, Christendom, and states
- 16 Patterns of world-historical development in agrarian societies
- Index
- References
3 - The emergence of stratification, states, and multi-power-actor civilization in Mesopotamia
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2013
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface to the new edition
- Preface
- 1 Societies as organized power networks
- 2 The end of general social evolution: how prehistoric peoples evaded power
- 3 The emergence of stratification, states, and multi-power-actor civilization in Mesopotamia
- 4 A comparative analysis of the emergence of stratification, states, and multi-power-actor civilizations
- 5 The first empires of domination: the dialectics of compulsory cooperation
- 6 “Indo-Europeans” and iron: expanding, diversified power networks
- 7 Phoenicians and Greeks: decentralized multi-power-actor civilizations
- 8 Revitalized empires of domination: Assyria and Persia
- 9 The Roman territorial empire
- 10 Ideology transcendent: the Christian ecumene
- 11 A comparative excursus into the world religions: Confucianism, Islam, and (especially) Hindu caste
- 12 The European dynamic: I. The intensive phase, a.d. 800–1155
- 13 The European dynamic: II. The rise of coordinating states, 1155–1477
- 14 The European dynamic: III. International capitalism and organic national states, 1477–1760
- 15 European conclusions: explaining European dynamism – capitalism, Christendom, and states
- 16 Patterns of world-historical development in agrarian societies
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction: civilization and alluvial agriculture
The argument of the last chapter was somewhat negative: The emergence of civilization was not an outgrowth of the general properties of prehistoric societies. This appears to be immediately supported by the fact that it happened independently only a few times – probably on six occasions, perhaps as rarely as three or as frequently as ten. Yet it has long been believed that there was something of a common pattern among these cases, centering on the presence of alluvial agriculture. So was the emergence of civilization, together with its concomitant features of social stratification and the state, more than a historical accident? Even if the cases were few, were they patterned? I will argue that they were. Identifying the pattern, and its limitations, is the purpose of this chapter and the next.
We can never exactly define what we mean by “civilization.” The word has too much resonance, and the prehistoric and historic record is too varied. If we focus on a single supposed characteristic of civilization, we get into difficulties. Writing, for example, is characteristic of peoples we intuitively regard as civilized. It is a perfect indicator of “history” rather than “prehistory.” But it is also found, in rudimentary form, in prehistoric southeastern Europe, unaccompanied by the other usual appurtenances of civilization. The Incas of Peru, generally thought of as “civilized,” did not have writing. Urbanization, also general to “civilization,” does not give us a perfect indicator.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Sources of Social Power , pp. 73 - 104Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2012
References
1977. The disconnections between power and rank as a process: an outline of the development of kingdoms in central Madagascar. Archives Europe ennes de Sociologie, 18.Google Scholar
1981. The chiefdom: precursor of the state. In The Transition to Statehood in the New World, ed. and . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1969. Main features of the economy in the monarchies of ancient western Asia. Third International Conference of Economic History, Munich, 1965. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
1972. Socio-economic classes in Babylonia and the Babylonian concept of social stratification. In XVIII Rencontre assyriologique international, ed. . Munich: Bayer, Ak-abh, phil, hist kl. Abh.Google Scholar
1975. Ancient writing and ancient written language: pitfalls and peculiarities in the study of Sumerian. Assyriological Studies, 20.Google Scholar
1975. On water control and management during the Ming and Ch'ing periods. In Ching-Shih wen Li, 3.Google Scholar
1968. The Olmec and the valley of Oaxaca. Dumbarton Oaks Conference on the Olmec. Washington: Dumbarton Oaks.Google Scholar
1972. The cultural evolution of civilizations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 3.Google Scholar
1974. Origins and ecological effects of early domestication in Iran and the Near East. In The Rise and Fall of Civilisations, ed. and . Menlo Park, Calif.: Cummings.Google Scholar
1967. Approaches to the study of ancient society. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1969. On the alleged temple and state economics in ancient Mesopotamia. Studi in Onore di Eduardo Volterra, 6.Google Scholar
1976. By state and cycle to Sumer. In The Legacy of Sumer, ed. . Malibu, Calif.: Undena.Google Scholar
, and . 1967. The prehistory of southwestern Iran. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 33.Google Scholar
1943. Primitive democracy in ancient Mesopotamia. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 2. (Also chap. 9 in Jacobsen, 1970.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1957. Early political developments in Mesopotamia. Zeitschrift Fur Assyriologies, N.F., 18. (Also chap. 8 in Jacobsen 1970.)Google Scholar
1970. Towards the Image of Tammuz and other Essays in Mesopotamian History and Culture. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
, and . 1974. Salt and Silt in Ancient Mesopotamian Agriculture. In and , Ancient Civilization and Trade. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
1970. Private credit in the commerce of ancient western Asia. In Fifth International Conference of Economic History, Leningrad, 1970. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
, and 1981. The Transition to Statehood in the New World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1972. Sumerian Economic Texts from the Drehem Archive, vol. 1. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
1982. The formations of tribal systems in later European pre-history: northern Europe 4000 B.C. – 500 B.C. In Theory and Explanation in Archaeology, ed. et al. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1976. The economic world of Sumer. In The Legacy of Sumer, ed. . Malibu, Calif.: Undena.Google Scholar
1955. Remarks on the archive of the soldier Ubarum. Journal of Cuneiform Studies, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1977. Mountains and Lowlands: Essays in the Archeology of Greater Mesopotamia. Malibua, Calif.: Undena.Google Scholar
1982. Cedar Forest to silver mountain: on metaphors of growth in early Syrian society. Paper given to a Conference on Relations between the Near East, the Mediterranean World and Europe: 4th–1st Millennia B.C., Aarhus, Aug. 1982.
1971. Science and Civilisation in China, vol. IV, pt. 3 (pub. separately). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1976. Geographie. In Sumerological Studies in Honor of Thorkild Jacobsen, ed. . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1978. Mesopotamian social organisation: archaeological and philological evidence. In The Evolution of Social Systems, ed. and . London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
1968. Agricultural Development in China 1368–1968. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1972. The Emergence of Civilisation: The Cyclades and the Aegean in the Third Millennium B.C.London: Methuen.Google Scholar
1975. Trade as action at a distance. In Ancient Civilization and Trade, ed. and . Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
1976. Dimorphic structure and the problem of the ‘Apiro-Ibrim’. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1976. Ancient Civilization and Trade. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
1983. Wessex in the third millennium B.C.: a case study as a basis for discussion. Paper given to a symposium “Time and History in Archaeology and Anthropology,” Royal Anthropological Institute, London.
1983. Are nations modern? Paper given to the London School of Economics ‘Pattern of History” seminar, Nov. 28, 1983.
1975. The flag follows trade. In Ancient Civilization and Trade, ed. and . Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
, and . 1975. Population, exchange and early state formation in southwestern Iran. American Anthropologist, 73.Google Scholar