Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T00:24:24.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Phoenicians and Greeks: decentralized multi-power-actor civilizations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2013

Michael Mann
Michael Mann
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access

Summary

In this chapter I discuss the emergence and development of the two major decentralized civilizations of the first millennium b.c., Phoenicia and Greece. I concentrate on Greece because it is considerably better documented: We can distinguish the principal phases of its dialectic of development. I argue that the massive contributions of both peoples to the development of social power is to be attributed to the decentralized, multi-level nature of their civilizations, appropriate for taking advantage of the geopolitical, military, and economic legacy of their region, especially that bequeathed by the Near Eastern empires of domination.

I suggest that two principal dialectics can be discerned in the emergence of Phoenicia and Greece as “leading edges” of contemporary power. The first, discussed briefly and tentatively, concerns the possibility that these civilizations were part of a macrohistorical process. In this case, decentralized multipower-actor civilizations lying on the marches of established empires of domination exploited the success plus the institutional rigidity of those empires to “emerge interstitially” and establish their own autonomous power organizations. After a long, successful process of power development, however, their own organizations became institutionalized and rigid. Now they become vulnerable in their turn to new empires of domination lying on their marches. Such a process can be traced in the first millennium b.c. The extent to which it was, indeed, part of a macrohistorical process will be left to the concluding chapter.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Sources of Social Power , pp. 190 - 230
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albright, W. 1946. From Stone Age to Christianity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. K. 1970. Military Theory and Practice in the Age of Xenophon. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1926. The “Art” of Rhetoric, ed. J. H., Freese. London: Heinemann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, 1948. Politics, ed. E., Barker. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Austin, M. M., and P., Vidal-Naquet. 1977. Economic and Social History of Ancient Greece: An Introduction. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Baldry, H. C. 1965. The Unity of Mankind in Greek Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, P. 1979. Alexander the Great's Campaigns. Cambridge: Patrick Stephens.Google Scholar
Braudel, F. 1975. The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II. 2 vols. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Cartledge, P. A. 1977. Hoplites and heroes: Sparta's contribution to the techniques of ancient warfare. Journal of Hellenic Studies, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, J. K. 1978. Democracy and Classical Greece. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. 1951. The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ehrenburg, V. 1969. The Greek State. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Ellis, J. R. 1976. Philip II and Macedonian Imperialism. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Finley, M. 1960. Slavery in Classical Antiquity: Views and Controversies. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
Finley, M. 1978. The fifth-century Athenian empire: a balance sheet. In Imperialism in the Ancient World, ed. P. D. A., Garnsey and C. R., Whittaker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Finley, M. 1983. Politics in the Ancient World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankenstein, S. 1979. The Phoenicians in the Far West: a function of Neo-Assyrian imperialism. In Power and Propaganda: A Symposium on Ancient Empires. ed. M. T., Larsen. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Goody, J. 1968. Introduction. In his Literacy in Traditional Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, J., and I., Watt. 1968. The Consequences of literacy. In In his Literacy in Traditional Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, J. 1964. The Canaanites. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Grierson, P. 1977. The Origins of Money. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Hammond, N. G. L. 1975. The Classical Age of Greece. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Harden, D. 1971. The Phoenicians. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Harvey, F. D. 1965. Two kinds of equality. In Classica et Mediaevalia, 26 and 27.Google Scholar
Harvey, F. D. 1966. Literacy in the Athenian democracy. Revue des Etudes Grecques, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heichelheim, F. M. 1958. An Ancient Economic History. Leiden: Sijthoff.Google Scholar
Herodotus, . 1972. The Histories, ed. A. R., Burn. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Hopper, R. J. 1976. The Early Greeks. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Larsen, J. A. O. 1968. Greek Federal States. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, W. 1963. The Rise of the West. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1973. The Grundrisse, ed. M., Nicolaus. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Meiggs, R. 1972. The Athenian Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. 1975. Alien Wisdom: The Limits of Hellenization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mossé, C. 1962. La fin de la démocratie athenienne. Paris: Publications de la Faculté des lettres et Sciences Humaines de Clermont-Ferrand.Google Scholar
Murray, O. 1980. Early Greece. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Pritchett, W. K. 1971. Ancient Greek Military Practices, Pt. 1. Berkeley: University of California Classical Studies, 7.Google Scholar
Rostovtzeff, M. 1941. Social and Economic History of the Hellenistic World. 3 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Runciman, W. G. 1982. Origins of states: the case of Archaic Greece. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ste. Croix, G. E. M. de. 1981. The Class Struggle in the Ancient Greek World. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Salmon, J. 1977. Political hoplites. Journal of Hellenic Studies, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snodgrass, A. M. 1965. The hoplite reform and history. Journal of Hellenic Studies, 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snodgrass, A. M. 1967. Arms and Armour of the Greeks. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, A. M. 1971. The Dark Age of Greece. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Stratton, J. 1980. Writing and the concept of law in ancient Greece. Visible Language, 14.Google Scholar
Thucydides, . 1910. The History of the Peloponnesian War. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P., and P., Vidal-Naquet. 1981. Tragedy and Myth in Ancient Greece. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. 1951. The problem of Greek nationality. Phoenix, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walbank, F. W. 1981. The Hellenistic World. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Warmington, B. H. 1969. Carthage. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1971. Early Greek Philosophy and the Orient. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whittaker, C. R. 1978. Carthaginian imperialism in the 5th and 4th centuries. In Imperialism in the Ancient World, ed. P. D. A., Garnsey and C. R., Whittaker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×