from PART III - THE MOVEMENT'S INFLUENCE ON PUBLIC POLICY
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 June 2019
‘The entire issue is a perfect example of a minor special interest group's ability to blow up an _issue’ to a level of importance which in no way relates to the reality of the world in which we live and work.’
-38-year old plant manager for a manufacturer of industrial goods quoted in Harvard Business ReviewBy 1981, feminist activists had made significant advances in convincing the public that sexual harassment was a real and serious problem. Courts in twenty-one states and the District of Columbia had recognized that sexual harassment could give rise to a federal or state cause of action against an employer, and many states had adopted legislation, executive orders, and regulations prohibiting sexual harassment. But the newly-installed Reagan administration immediately attempted to weaken sexual harassment prohibitions and reduce the effectiveness of the EEOC. Hostile reactions arose from other quarters as well, amounting to a backlash against the anti-sexual harassment movement. While in the 1970s, most resistance to the movement came from employers defending sexual harassment suits, in the early 1980s, hostile reactions to new sexual harassment laws emerged from individuals accused of sexual harassment, conservative advocacy organizations, and even men on the left. Individuals accused of sexual harassment began to fight back more aggressively by bringing lawsuits against their accusers for defamation or their employers for wrongful termination, breach of contract, and other claims. They also filed union grievances challenging employers’ disciplinary measures imposed for sexual harassment. Employers and their advocates became even more active in resisting sexual harassment prohibitions than they had been in the 1970s. Ironically, the most outspoken critic of sexual harassment prohibitions was a woman, Phyllis Schlafly, who testified before Congress on behalf of the antifeminist group Eagle Forum. The movement that had fought for sexual harassment prohibitions now worked to diffuse this backlash, drawing on the networks they had developed in the 1970s as well as new organizations addressing the issue. The changing political and legal context, however, changed the character of the movement as the 1980s progressed.
BATTLE TO PRESERVE THE EEOC GUIDELINES
Upon taking office, the Reagan administration aggressively acted to curtail affirmative action and equal employment opportunity programs. Included within this agenda was an attempt to weaken and even abolish the EEOC sexual harassment guidelines. The first attempt to overturn the EEOC guidelines came from Utah Republican Senator Orrin Hatch.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.