Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T17:57:42.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - An Emerging Human Right to Security from Climate Change: The Case Against Gas Flaring in Nigeria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2009

By
Amy Sinden
Edited by
William C. G. Burns  and
Hari M. Osofsky
William C. G. Burns
Affiliation:
Santa Clara University, School of Law
Hari M. Osofsky
Affiliation:
Washington and Lee University, Virginia
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Is there a human right to security from climate change? A recent ruling by the Federal High Court of Nigeria suggests that there is. Royal Dutch/Shell Group (Shell) and the other companies that produce oil in Nigeria have engaged for decades in a practice called “gas flaring,” in which natural gas released during oil extraction is burned off, discharging large clouds of greenhouse gases and other pollutants into the atmosphere. Citing the climatic and other environmental impacts of gas flaring on their community, Nigerians living near the flares filed a lawsuit charging that the practice violates their fundamental rights to life and dignity guaranteed under the Nigerian constitution. In a ruling on November 14, 2005, the Federal High Court of Nigeria agreed and ordered Shell and the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation “to take immediate steps to stop the further flaring of gas” in the plaintiffs' community. Although the court's ruling thus far has had little practical effect – the oil companies have yet to comply and are appealing the order – it opens up intriguing possibilities for crafting legal approaches to the problem of climate change.

Little analysis of the plaintiffs' climate change claim accompanied the Nigerian court's ruling, but the notion that actions that contribute substantially to climate change may violate fundamental constitutional or human rights is intuitively appealing.

Type
Chapter
Information
Adjudicating Climate Change
State, National, and International Approaches
 , pp. 173 - 192
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Worika, Ibibia Lucky, Deprivation, Despoliation and Destitution: Whither Environment and Human Rights in Nigeria's Niger Delta?, 8 ILSA J. Int'l & Comp. L.1, 4 (2001)Google Scholar
Ebeku, Kaniye S. A., Biodiversity Conservation in Nigeria: An Appraisal of the Legal Regime in Relation to the Niger Delta Area of the Country, 16 J. Envtl. L. 361, 362–65 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinsato, Alison, Increasing the Accountability of Transnational Corporations for Environmental Harms: The Petroleum Industry in Nigeria, 4 Nw. U. J. Int'l Hum. Rights186, 191 (2005)Google Scholar
O'Neill, Tom, Curse of the Black Gold: Hope and Betrayal in the Niger Delta, Nat'l Geographic, Feb. 2007, at 88Google Scholar
Farah, Douglas, Nigeria's Oil Exploitation Leaves Delta Poor, Poisoned, Wash. Post, Mar. 18, 2001, at A22Google Scholar
Lewis, Paul, Blood and Oil: A Special Report: After Nigeria Represses, Shell Defends Its Record, N.Y. Times, Feb. 13, 1996, at A1Google Scholar
Cassel, Douglass, Corporate Initiatives: A Second Human Rights Revolution?, 19 Fordham Int'l L.J.1963, 1965–66 (1996)Google Scholar
Lewis, Paul, Blood and Oil: A Special Report: After Nigeria Represses, Shell Defends Its Record, N.Y. Times, Feb. 13, 1996, at A1Google Scholar
Cassel, Douglass, Corporate Initiatives: A Second Human Rights Revolution?, 19 Fordham Int'l L.J.1963, 1966–67 (1996)Google Scholar
Shell Denies Foul Play in Nigerian Murder Trial, Guardian, Sept. 29, 1995, at 13
Nwobike, Justice C., The African Commission on Human and People's Rights and the Demystification of Second and Third Generation Rights under the African Charter: Social and Economic Rights Action Center (SERAC) and the Center for Economic and Social Rights (CESR) v. Nigeria, 1 African J. Legal Stud.129 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuman, Gerald L., Human Rights and Constitutional Rights: Harmony and Dissonance, 55 Stan. L. Rev.1863 (2003)Google Scholar
Ratner, Steven, Corporations and Human Rights: A Theory of Legal Responsibility, 111 Yale L.J. 443, 466 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, Philip, A Third Generation of Solidarity Rights: Progressive Development or Obfuscation of International Human Rights Law? 29 Neth. Int'l L. Rev.307 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Barry E., Wolfson, Steve & Targ, Nicholas, Human Rights and the Environment: A Synopsis and Some Predictions, 16 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev.359, 381–82 (2004)Google Scholar
Bandes, Susan, “We the People” and Our Enduring Values, 96 Mich. L. Rev. 1376, 1389, 1391 (1998)Google Scholar
Blasi, Vincent, The Checking Value in First Amendment Theory, Am. B. Found. Res. J.521 (1977)Google Scholar
Colker, Ruth, Anti-Subordination Above All: Sex, Race, and Equal Protection, 61 N.Y.U. L. Rev.1003, 1007 (1986)Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen M., Groups and the Equal Protection Clause, 5 Phil. & Pub. Aff.107, 154–55 (1976)Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R., Interest Groups in American Public Law, 38 Stan. L. Rev.29, 50–51 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macalister, Terry, Exxon and Shell See Profits Rocket, Guardian Unlimited, Feb. 1, 2007Google Scholar
Stewart, Richard B., Pyramids of Sacrifice? Problems of Federalism in Mandating State Implementation of National Environmental Policy, 86 Yale L.J.1196, 1213 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osofsky, Hari M., Learning from Environmental Justice: A New Model for International Environmental Rights, 24 Stan. Envtl. L.J.71 (2005)Google Scholar
Hill, Barry E., Wolfson, Steve & Targ, Nicholas, Human Rights and the Environment: A Synopsis and Some Predictions, 16 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev. 359, 382–87 (2004)Google Scholar
Birkinshaw, Patrick, Freedom of Information and Openness: Fundamental Human Rights?, 58 Admin. L. Rev.177 (2006)Google Scholar
Bratspies, Rebecca M., “Organs of Society”: A Plea for Human Rights Accountability for Transnational Business Enterprises and Other Business Entities, 13 Mich. St. J. Int'l L.9 (2005)Google Scholar
Osofsky, Hari M., Environmental Human Rights under the Alien Tort Statute: Redress for Indigenous Victims of Multinational Corporations, 20 Suffolk Transnat'l L. Rev.335 (1997)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×