Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T12:10:40.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2021

David T. Sandwell
David T. Sandwell
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Advanced Geodynamics
The Fourier Transform Method
 , pp. 262 - 267
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arredondo, K., and Billen, M., Coupled effects of phase transitions and rheology in 2-d dynamical models of subduction, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 122 (7), 5813–5830, 2017.Google Scholar
Banks, R., Parker, R., and Heustis, S., Isostatic compensation on a continental scale: Local versus regional mechanisms, Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 51 , 431–452, 1977.Google Scholar
Becker, J., et al., Global bathymetry and elevation data at 30 arc seconds resolution: SRTM30-PLUS, Marine Geodesy, 32 (4), 355–371, 2009.Google Scholar
Blakely, J., Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetics, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1995.Google Scholar
Brace, W., and Kohlstedt, D., Limits on lithospheric stress imposed by laboratory experiments, Journal of Geophysical Research, 85 (B11), 6248–6252, 1980.Google Scholar
Bracewell, R., The Fourier Transform and Its Applications, second ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
Brown, C., and Phillips, R., Flexural rift flank uplift at the Rio Grande rift, New Mexico, Tectonics, 18 (6), 1275–1291, 1999.Google Scholar
Burridge, R., and Knopoff, L., Body force equivalents for seismic dislocations, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 54 (6A), 1875–1888, 1964.Google Scholar
Byerlee, J., Friction of rocks, in Rock Friction and Earthquake Prediction, pp. 615–626, Springer, 1978.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J., Haxby, W., Karig, D. E., and Turcotte, D., On the applicability of a universal elastic trench profile, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 31 (2), 239–246, 1976.Google Scholar
Cande, S., LaBrecque, J., Pitman, R., Golovchenko, X., and Haxby, W., Magnetic Lineations of the World’s Ocean Basins, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, 1989.Google Scholar
Carslaw, H., and Jaeger, J., Conduction of Heat in Solids, second ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1959.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. J., Oceanic crustal thickness versus spreading rate, Geophysical Research Letters, 19 (8), 753–756, 1992.Google Scholar
Cohen, S., Numerical models of crustal deformation in seismic zones, Advances in Geophysics, 41 , 134–231, 1999.Google Scholar
Cohen, S., and Smith, D., Lageos scientific results: Introduction, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 90 (B11), 9217–9220, 1985.Google Scholar
Conrad, C., and Lithgow-Bertelloni, C., How mantle slabs drive plate tectonics, Science, 298 (5591), 207–209, 2002.Google Scholar
Crough, S., Hotspot swells, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 11 (1), 165–193, 1983.Google Scholar
Cuffey, K., and Patterson, W., The Physics of Glaciers, third ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, imprint of Elsevier, Burlington, MA, 2010.Google Scholar
Dalen, F., Isostasy and the ambient state of stress in the oceanic lithosphere, Journal of Geophysical Research, 86 , 7801–7807, 1981.Google Scholar
DeMets, C., Gordon, R., Argus, D., and Stein, S., Current plate motions, Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 101 , 425–478, 1990.Google Scholar
DeMets, C., Gordon, R., Argus, D., and Stein, S., Geologically current plate motions, Geophysical Journal International, 181 , 1–80, 2010.Google Scholar
Doin, M., and Fleitout, L., Thermal evolution of the oceanic lithosphere: An alternate view, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 142 , 121–136, 1996.Google Scholar
Dorman, L., and Lewis, B., Experimental isostasy 3: Inversion of the isostatic Green’s function and lateral density changes, Journal of Geophysical Research, 77 , 3068–3077, 1972.Google Scholar
Engdahl, E., van der Hilst, R., and Buland, R., Global teleseismic earthquake relocation with improved travel times and procedures for depth determination, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 88 , 722–743, 1998.Google Scholar
Fialko, Y., Temperature fields generated by the elastodynamic propagation of shear cracks in the earth, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 109 (B1), 2004.Google Scholar
Fleitout, L., and Froidevaux, C., Tectonics and topography for a lithosphere containing density heterogeneities, Tectonics, 1 , 21–56, 1982.Google Scholar
Fleitout, L., and Froidevaux, C., Tectonic stresses in the lithosphere, Tectonics, 2 , 315–324, 1983.Google Scholar
Flesch, L., Haines, A., and Holt, W., Dynamics of the India-Eurasia collision zone, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 106 (B8), 16,435–16,460, 2001.Google Scholar
Forsyth, D., and Uyeda, S., On the relative importance of the driving forces of plate motion, Geophysical Journal International, 43 (1), 163–200, 1975.Google Scholar
Fowler, C., The Solid Earth: An Introduction to Global Geophysics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990.Google Scholar
Garcia, E., Sandwell, D., and Luttrell, K., An iterative spectral solution method for thin elastic plate flexure with variable rigidity, Geophysical Journal International, 200 (2), 1012–1028, 2014.Google Scholar
Garcia, E., Sandwell, D., and Bassett, D., Outer trench slope flexure and faulting at Pacific basin subduction zones, Geophysical Journal International, 218 (1), 708–728, 2019.Google Scholar
Garland, G., The Earth’s Shape and Gravity, Pergamon Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Gee, J., and Kent, D., Variation in layer 2A thickness and the origin of the central anomaly magnetic high, Geophysical Research Letters, 21 (4), 297–300, 1994.Google Scholar
Gee, J., and Kent, D., Source of oceanic magnetic anomalies and the geomagnetic polarity timescale, in Treatise on Geophysics, edited by Schubert, G., pp. 455–507, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007.Google Scholar
Goetze, C., and Evans, B., Stress and temperature in the bending lithosphere as constrained by experimental rock mechanics, Geophysical Journal International, 59 (3), 463–478, 1979.Google Scholar
Greenberg, M., Applications of Green’s Functions in Science and Engineering, Dover Publications, 2015.Google Scholar
Hager, B., Subducted slabs and the geoid: Constraints on mantle rheology and flow, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 89 (B7), 6003–6015, 1984.Google Scholar
Hasterok, D., A heat flow based cooling model for tectonic plates, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 361 , 34–43, 2013.Google Scholar
Haxby, W., and Turcotte, D., On isostatic geoid anomalies, Journal of Geophysical Research, 83 , 5, 473–5, 478, 1978.Google Scholar
Haxby, W., Garner, G., LaBrecque, J., and Weissel, J., Digital images of combined oceanic and continental data sets and their use in tectonic studies, EOS Transactions American Geophysical Union, 64 , 995–1004, 1983.Google Scholar
Horner-Johnson, B. C., and Gordon, R., Equatorial Pacific magnetic anomalies identified from vector aeromagnetic data, Geophysical Journal International, 155 (2), 547–556, 2003.Google Scholar
Hwang, C., and Parsons, B., An optimal procedure for deriving marine gravity from multi-satellite altimetry, Geophysical Journal International, 125 , 705–719, 1996.Google Scholar
Jackson, J., Classical Electrodynamics, third ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1998.Google Scholar
Jaeger, J., Cook, N., and Zimmerman, R., Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics, John Wiley & Sons, 2009.Google Scholar
Johnson, C., and Sandwell, D., Lithospheric flexure on Venus, Geophysical Journal International, 119 (2), 627–647, 1994.Google Scholar
Kent, G., Harding, A., and Orcutt, J., Distribution of magma beneath the East Pacific rise between the Clipperton Transform and the 9◦ 17’ deval from forward modeling of common depth point data, Journal of Geophysical Research, 98 , 13,945–13,969, 1993.Google Scholar
Kohlstedt, D., Evans, B., and Mackwell, S., Strength of the lithosphere: Constraints imposed by laboratory experiments, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 100 (B9), 17,587–17,602, 1995.Google Scholar
Lachenbruch, A., and Sass, J., Heat flow and energetics of the San Andreas fault zone, Journal of Geophysical Research, 85 , 6185–6222, 1980.Google Scholar
Laske, G., Masters, G., Ma, Z., and Pasyanos, M., Update on CRUST1.0 A 1-degree global model of Earth’s crust, in Geophysical Research Abstracts, vol. 15, p. 2658, EGU General Assembly Vienna, Austria, 2013.Google Scholar
Leeds, A., and Kausel, E., Variations of upper mantle structure under the Pacific Ocean, Science, 186 , 141–143, 1974.Google Scholar
Levitt, D., and Sandwell, D., Lithospheric bending at subduction zones based on depth soundings and satellite gravity, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 100 , 379–400, 1995.Google Scholar
Luttrell, K., Sandwell, D., Smith-Konter, B., Bills, B., and Bock, Y., Modulation of the earthquake cycle at the southern San Andreas fault by lake loading, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 112 (B8), 2007.Google Scholar
Massell, C., Large scale structural variation of trench outer slopes and rises, Ph.D. dissertation, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA, 2002.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D., and Bowin, C., The relationship between bathymetry and gravity in the Atlantic Ocean, Journal of Geophysical Research, 81 , 1903–1915, 1976.Google Scholar
McNutt, M., Compensation of oceanic topography: An application of the response function technique to the Surveyor area, Journal of Geophysical Research, 84 , 7,589–7,598, 1979.Google Scholar
McNutt, M., and Menard, H., Lithospheric flexure and uplifted atolls, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 83 (B3), 1206–1212, 1978.Google Scholar
McNutt, M., and Menard, H., Constraints on yield strength in the oceanic lithosphere derived from observations of flexure, Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 71 , 363–394, 1982.Google Scholar
Menard, H., Marine geology of the Pacific, McGraw-Hill, 1964.Google Scholar
Miller, L., and Douglas, B. C., On the rate and causes of twentieth century sea-level rise, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical , Physical and Engineering Sciences, 364 (1841), 805–820, 2006.Google Scholar
Minster, J., and Jordan, T., Present-day plate motions, Journal of Geophysical Research, 85 , 5331–5354, 1978.Google Scholar
Mitrovica, J. X., Gomez, N., and Clark, P. U., The sea-level fingerprint of West Antarctic collapse, Science, 323 (5915), 753, 2009.Google Scholar
Mueller, S., and Phillips, R. J., On the reliability of lithospheric constraints derived from models of outer-rise flexure, Geophysical Journal International, 123 (3), 887–902, 1995.Google Scholar
Müller, R., Roest, W., Royer, J., Gahagan, L., et al., Digital isochrons of the world’s ocean floor, Journal of Geophysical Research, 102 , 3211–3214, 1997.Google Scholar
Oxburgh, E., and Parmentier, E., Compositional and density stratification in oceanic lithosphere-causes and consequences, Journal of the Geological Society, 133 (4), 343–355, 1977.Google Scholar
Parker, R., The rapid calculation of potential anomalies, Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 31 , 441–455, 1973.Google Scholar
Parsons, B., and Richter, F., A relationship between the driving force and geoid anomaly associated with mid-ocean ridges, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 51 , 445–450, 1980.Google Scholar
Parsons, B., and Sclater, J., An analysis of the variation of the ocean floor bathymetry and heat flow with age, Journal of Geophysical Research, 82 , 803–827, 1977.Google Scholar
Pavlis, N., Holmes, S., Kenyon, S., and Factor, J., The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008), Journal of Geophysical Research, 117 (B4), 2012.Google Scholar
Priestley, K., McKenzie, D., and Ho, T., A lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary-a global model derived from multimode surface-wave tomography and petrology, Lithospheric Discontinuities, pp. 111–123, 2018.Google Scholar
Rapp, R., and Yi, Y., Role of ocean variability and dynamic topography in the recovery of the mean sea surface and gravity anomalies from satellite altimeter data., Journal of Geodesy, 71 , 617–629, 1997.Google Scholar
Renkin, M., and Sclater, J., Depth and age in the North Pacific, Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth, 93 , 2919–2935, 1988.Google Scholar
Ryan, M. (Ed.), Magmatic Systems, Academic Press, San Diego, 1994.Google Scholar
Sandwell, D., Thermal isostasy: Response of a moving lithosphere to a distributed heat source, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 87 (B2), 1001–1014, 1982.Google Scholar
Sandwell, D., Thermomechanical evolution of oceanic fracture zones, Journal of Geophysical Research, 89 , 11,401–11,413, 1984.Google Scholar
Sandwell, D., Biharmonic spline interpolation of geos-3 and seasat altimeter data, Geophysical Research Letters, 14 (2), 139–142, 1987.Google Scholar
Sandwell, D., and Schubert, G., Lithospheric flexure at fracture zones, Journal of Geophysical Research, 87 , 4657–4667, 1982a.Google Scholar
Sandwell, D., and Schubert, G., Evidence for retrograde lithospheric subduction on Venus, Science, 257 (5071), 766–770, 1992.Google Scholar
Sandwell, D., and Smith, W., Marine gravity anomaly from Geosat and ERS-1 satellite altimetry, Journal of Geophysical Research, 102 , 10,039–10,054, 1997.Google Scholar
Sandwell, D., Müller, R. D., Smith, W., Garcia, E., and Francis, R., New global marine gravity model from CryoSat-2 and Jason-1 reveals buried tectonic structure, Science, 346 (6205), 65–67, 2014.Google Scholar
Sandwell, D., Harper, H., Tozer, B., and Smith, W., Gravity field recovery from geodetic altimeter missions, Advances in Space Research, 2019.Google Scholar
Sandwell, D. T., and Schubert, G., Geoid height-age relation from seasat altimeter profiles across the Mendocino fracture zone, Journal of Geophysical Research, 87 (B5), 3949–3958, 1982b.Google Scholar
Savage, J., Equivalent strike-slip cycles in half-space and lithosphere-asthenosphere earth models, Journal of Geophysical Research, 95 , 4873–4879, 1990.Google Scholar
Savage, J., and Burford, R., Geodetic determination of relative plate motion in central California, Journal of Geophysical Research, 78 (5), 832–845, 1973.Google Scholar
Scambos, T., Sergienko, O., Sargent, A., MacAyeal, D., and Fastook, J., Icesat profiles of tabular iceberg margins and iceberg breakup at low latitudes, Geophysical Research Letters, 32 (23), 2005.Google Scholar
Schouten, H., and McCamy, K., Filtering marine magnetic anomalies, Journal of Geophysical Research, 77 , 7089–7099, 1972.Google Scholar
Schouten, J. A., A fundamental analysis of magnetic anomalies over oceanic ridges, Marine Geophysical Researches, 1 (2), 111–144, 1971.Google Scholar
Schubert, G., and Sandwell, D., Crustal volumes of the continents and of oceanic and continental submarine plateaus, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 92 (2), 234–246, 1989.Google Scholar
Schubert, G., and Sandwell, D., A global survey of possible subduction sites on Venus, Icarus, 117 (1), 173–196, 1995.Google Scholar
Sclater, J., Jaupart, C., and Galson, D., The heat flow through oceanic and continental crust and the heat loss of the Earth, Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics, 18 , 269–311, 1980.Google Scholar
Segall, P., Earthquake and volcano deformation, Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Seton, M., Müller, R. D., Zahirovic, S., Williams, S., Wright, N. M., Cannon, J., Whittaker, J. M., Matthews, K. J., and McGirr, R., A global data set of present-day oceanic crustal age and seafloor spreading parameters, Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 21 (10), e2020GC009,214, 2020.Google Scholar
Siebert, L., and Simkin, T., Volcanoes of the World: an Illustrated Catalog of Holocene Volcanoes and their Eruptions, vol. GVP-3, Smithsonian Institution, Global Volcanism Program, Digital Information Series, http://www.volcano.si.edu/world/, 2002.Google Scholar
Smith, B., and Sandwell, D., Coulomb stress accumulation along the San Andreas fault system, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 108 (B6), 2003.Google Scholar
Smith, B., and Sandwell, D., A three-dimensional semianalytic viscoelastic model for time-dependent analyses of the earthquake cycle, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 109 (B12), 2004.Google Scholar
Smith, G., and Banerjee, S., Magnetic structure of the upper kilometer of the marine crust at DSDP hole 504B, Eastern Pacific Ocean, Journal of Geophysical Research, 91 , 10,337–10,354, 1986.Google Scholar
Smith, W., and Sandwell, D., Bathymetric prediction from dense satellite altimetry and sparse shipboard bathymetry, Journal of Geophysical Research, 99 , 21,803–21,824, 1994.Google Scholar
Smith, W., and Sandwell, D., Global sea floor topography from satellite altimetry and ship depth soundings, Science, 277 , 1956–1962, 1997.Google Scholar
Smith-Konter, B., and Sandwell, D., Stress evolution of the San Andreas fault system: Recurrence interval versus locking depth, Geophysical Research Letters, 36 (13), 2009.Google Scholar
Stacey, F., Physics of the Earth, John Wiley & Sons, 1977.Google Scholar
Staudigel, H., Koppers, A., Lavelle, J., Pitcher, T., and Shank, T., Defining the word “Seamount”, Oceanography, 23 (1), 2010.Google Scholar
Stein, C. A., and Stein, S., A model for the global variation in oceanic depth and heat flow with lithospheric age, Nature, 359 (6391), 123–129, 1992.Google Scholar
Steketee, J., On Volterra’s dislocations in a semi-infinite elastic medium, Canadian Journal of Physics, 36 (2), 192–205, 1958.Google Scholar
Tozer, B., Sandwell, D., Smith, W., Olson, C., Beale, J., and Wessel, P., Global bathymetry and topography at 15 arc sec: Srtm15+, Earth and Space Science, 6 (10), 1847–1864, 2019.Google Scholar
Turcotte, D., and Oxburgh, E., Finite amplitude convection cells and continental drift, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 28 , 29–42, 1967.Google Scholar
Turcotte, D., and Schubert, G., Geodynamics, third ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014.Google Scholar
Van Avendonk, H. J., Davis, J. K., Harding, J. L., and Lawver, L. A., Decrease in oceanic crustal thickness since the breakup of Pangaea, Nature Geoscience, 10 (1), 58–61, 2017.Google Scholar
Vaughan, D., Tidal flexure at ice shelf margins, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 100 (B4), 6213–6224, 1995.Google Scholar
Vink, G., Morgan, W., and Zhao, W.-L., Preferential rifting of continents: a source of displaced terranes, Journal of Geophysical Research, 89 (B12), 10,072–10,076, 1984.Google Scholar
Watts, A., An analysis of isostasy in the world’s oceans 1. Hawaiian-Emperor seamount chain, Journal of Geophysical Research, 83 (B12), 5989–6004, 1978.Google Scholar
Watts, A., Isostasy and Flexure of the Lithosphere, Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Wdowinski, S., Smith-Konter, B., Bock, Y., and Sandwell, D., Diffuse interseismic deformation across the Pacific–North America plate boundary, Geology, 35 (4), 311–314, 2007.Google Scholar
Weertman, J., and Weertman, J. R., Elementary dislocation theory, Macmillan, 1966.Google Scholar
Weissel, J., and Karner, G., Flexural uplift of rift flanks due to mechanical unloading of the lithosphere during extension, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 94 (B10), 13,919–13,950, 1989.Google Scholar
Wessel, P., Global distribution of seamounts inferred from gridded Geosat/ERS-1 altimetry, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 106 (B9), 19,431–19,441, 2001.Google Scholar
Wessel, P., and Bercovici, D., Interpolation with splines in tension: a Green’s function approach, Mathematical Geology, 30 (1), 77–93, 1998.Google Scholar
Wessel, P., and Smith, W., New version of the Generic Mapping Tools released, EOS Trans. AGU, 76 , 329, http://gmt.soest.hawaii.edu/, 1995.Google Scholar
Wessel, P., Luis, J., Uieda, L., Scharroo, R., Wobbe, F., Smith, W., and Tian, D., The generic mapping tools version 6, Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2019.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • David T. Sandwell, University of California, San Diego
  • Book: Advanced Geodynamics
  • Online publication: 01 December 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024822.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • David T. Sandwell, University of California, San Diego
  • Book: Advanced Geodynamics
  • Online publication: 01 December 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024822.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • David T. Sandwell, University of California, San Diego
  • Book: Advanced Geodynamics
  • Online publication: 01 December 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024822.021
Available formats
×