The Aesthetics of Hope in Late Greek Imperial Literature Methodius of Olympus' Symposium and the Crisis of the Third Century
Book contents
- The Aesthetics of Hope in Late Greek Imperial Literature
- Greek Culture in the Roman World
- The Aesthetics of Hope in Late Greek Imperial Literature
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Mapping Third-Century Literature from the Severans to Constantine
- Chapter 2 The End of Dialogue?
- Chapter 3 Compilation and Unity in Imperial Sympotic Traditions
- Chapter 4 Rhetoric and the Problem of Rivalry
- Chapter 5 The Lyric Tradition and Changing Hymnic Forms
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 November 2019
Book contents
- The Aesthetics of Hope in Late Greek Imperial Literature
- Greek Culture in the Roman World
- The Aesthetics of Hope in Late Greek Imperial Literature
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Mapping Third-Century Literature from the Severans to Constantine
- Chapter 2 The End of Dialogue?
- Chapter 3 Compilation and Unity in Imperial Sympotic Traditions
- Chapter 4 Rhetoric and the Problem of Rivalry
- Chapter 5 The Lyric Tradition and Changing Hymnic Forms
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Aesthetics of Hope in Late Greek Imperial LiteratureMethodius of Olympus' Symposium and the Crisis of the Third Century, pp. 247 - 274Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Addey, C. (2014) Divination and Theurgy in Neoplatonism: Oracles of the Gods. Farnham.Google Scholar
Aerts, W. and Kortekaas, G. (1998) Die Apokalypse des Pseudo-Methodius: die ältesten griechischen und lateinischen Übersetzungen. 2 vols. Leuven.Google Scholar
Allacci, L. (Allatius, Leo) (1656). S. P. N. Methodii, Episcopi et Martyris, Convivum Decem Virginum. Rome.Google Scholar
Amacker, R. and Junod, E. (2002) Pamphile et Eusèbe de Césarée, Apologie pour Origène. Suive de Rufin d’Aquilée: Sur la falsification des livres d’Origène. SC 464. Paris.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. (1990) “The Second Sophistic: Some Problems of Perspective,” in Russell, D. A. (ed.), Antonine Literature. Oxford: 91–110.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. (1993) The Second Sophistic: A Cultural Phenomenon in the Roman Empire. London.Google Scholar
Arbesmann, R., Daley, E. J. and Quain, E. (trans.) (1950) Tertullian: Apologetical Works and Minucius Felix: Octavius. Fathers of the Church 10. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. H. (1966) Plotinus. Porphyry on Plotinus. Ennead I. Loeb Classical Library 440. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Aune, D. (1978) “Septem Sapientium Convivium (Moralia 146B-164D),” in Betz, H. D. (ed.), Plutarch’s Ethical Writings and Early Christian Literature. Leiden: 51–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babbitt, F. C. (1927) Plutarch. Moralia. Volume I. Loeb Classical Library 197. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Babbitt, F. C. (1936) Plutarch. Moralia. Volume V. Loeb Classical Library 306. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Badurina, T. (1942) Doctrina S. Methodii de Olympio de Peccato Originali et de eius Effectibus. Rome.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. Holquist, M., trans. C. Emerson and H. Holquist. Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1984) Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Theory and History of Literature 8. Ed. and trans. Caryl Emerson, intro. Wayne C. Booth. Minneapolis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balty, J. (1988) “Apamea in Syria in the Second and Third Centuries AD,” JRS 78: 91–104.Google Scholar
Bardy, G. (1932) “La littérature patristique des ‘Questiones et responsiones’ sur l’Ecriture Sainte.” Revue Biblique 41: 210–36, 341–69, 515–37.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1989) “Antiochus of Ascalon,” in Griffin, M. and Barnes, J. (eds), Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford: 51–96.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. (eds) (1997) Philosophia Togata II: Plato and Aristotle at Rome. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrier, J. (2009) The Acts of Paul and Thecla: A Critical Introduction and Commentary. Tübingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayless, M. (1996) Parody in the Middle Ages: The Latin Tradition. Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BeDuhn, J. and Mirecki, P. (2007) Frontiers of Faith: The Christian Encounter with Manichaeism in the Acts of Archelaus. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biamonti, A. (1922) “L’etica di Metodio d’Olimpo,” Rivista Trimestrale di studi filosofice e religiosi 3: 272–98.Google Scholar
Biamonti, A. (1923) “L’escatologia di Metodio d’Olimpo,” Rivista Trimestrale di studi filosofice e religiosi 4: 182–202.Google Scholar
Bidez, J. (trans.) (1960) L’Empereur Julian Œuvres complètes, I/2. Lettres et fragments. Paris.Google Scholar
Blair, A. (1999) “The Problemata as a Natural Philosophical Genre,” in Grafton, A and Siraisi, N (eds), Natural Particulars: Nature and Disciplines in Renaissance Europe. Cambridge, MA: 171–204.Google Scholar
Bonwetsch, G. N. (1898) Über die Schrift des Methodius vom Aussatz: Abh. f. Alex. v. Ottingen. Munich.Google Scholar
Bonwetsch, G. N. (1917) Die Griechischen Christlichen Schriftsteller (GCS) der Ersten Drei Jahrhunderte: Methodius. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Bostrom, F. (1932) Studier till den Grekiska Teologins Fralsningslara med Sarskild Hansyn till Methodius av Olympus och Athanasius av Alexandria. Lund.Google Scholar
Bouvy, E. (1886) Poetes et melodes: Etude sur les origines du rythme tonique dans l’hymnographie de l’Eglise grecque. Nimes.Google Scholar
Bovon, F. and Duffy, J. (2012) “A New Greek Fragment from Ariston of Pella’s ‘Dialogue of Jason and Papiscus’,” Harvard Theological Review 105.4: 457–65.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. (1974) “Introduction: The Greek Renaissance,” in Approaches to the Second Sophistic: Papers Presented at the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Philological Association. University Park, PA: 1–3.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. (2002) “Philosophy in the Second Sophistic.” In Clark, G. and Rajak, T. (ed.), Philosophy and Power in the Greco-Roman World: Essays in Honor of Miriam Griffin. Oxford: 157–70.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G., Brown, P. and Grabar, O. (eds) (1999) Late Antiquity: A Guide to the Postclassical World. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (1989a) “Greek Sophists and Greek Poetry in the Second Sophistic,”ANRW II.33.1: 209–58.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (1989b) “Poetry and Poets in Asia and Achaia,” in Walker, J. and Cameron, A (eds), The Greek Renaissance in the Roman Empire: Papers from the Tenth British Museum Classical Colloquium. London: 198–205.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (1990) “Greek Poetry in the Antonine Age,” in Russell, D. A. (ed.), Antonine Literature. Oxford: 53–90.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (1993) “Greek Table-Talk Before Plato,” Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric 11.4: 355–71.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (2009) “Philostratus: The Life of a Sophist,” in Bowie, E and Elsner, J. (eds), Philostratus. Cambridge: 19–32.Google Scholar
Bowman, A., Garnsey, P. and Cameron, A. (eds) (2005) The Cambridge Ancient History, 2nd ed. XII. The Crisis of Empire, A.D. 193–337. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Braccini, T. (ed.) (2004) Carmen choliambicum quod apud Ps.-Callisthenis Historiam Alexandri reperitur. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracht, K. (1999) Vollkommenheit und Vollendung: Zur Anthropologie des Methodius von Olympus. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Bracht, K. (2001) “The Question of the Episcopal See of Methodius of Olympus Reconsidered,” StPatr 34: 3–10.Google Scholar
Bracht, K. (2009) “God and Methodius: Use of, and Background to, the Term aprosdees as a Description of God in the Works of Methodius of Olympus,” in McGowen, ? (ed.), God in Early Christian Thought: Essays in Memory of Lloyd G. Patterson. Leiden: 105–22.Google Scholar
Bracht, K. (ed.) (2017) Methodius of Olympus: State of the Art and New Perspectives. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braund, D. and Wilkins, J. (ed.) (2000) Athenaeus and his World: Reading Greek Culture in the Roman Empire. Exeter.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. (1990) “Adolescents, Symposion, and Pederasty,” in Murray, O (ed.), Sympotica. A Symposium on the Symposion. Oxford: 135–148.Google Scholar
Bril, A. (2006) “Plato and the Sympotic Form in the Symposium of St Methodius of Olympus,” ZAC 9: 279–302.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. and Patillon, M. (1994) “Longinus Platonicus et Philologus: I. Longinus Philosophus,” ANRW II 36.7: 5214–99.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. and Patillon, M. (1997) “Longinus Platonicus et Philologus: II. Longinus Philologus,” ANRW II 34.4: 3023–108.Google Scholar
Brock, S. (1985) “Syriac and Greek Hymnography: Problems of Origin,” StPatr 16 : 77–81.Google Scholar
Brown, P. (1971) “The Rise and Function of the Holy Man in Late Antiquity,” Journal of Roman Studies 61: 80–101.Google Scholar
Brown, P. (1988) The Body and Society: Men, Women and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity. Columbia.Google Scholar
Brown, P. (1998) “The Rise and Function of the Holy Man in Antiquity, 1971–1997,” JECS 6.3: 353–76.Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. (1966) Tyranii Rufini librorum Adamantii Origenis adversus haereticos interpretatio. Eingeleitet, hrsg. und kritisch kommentiert. Munich.Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. (1981) “Das Symposion des Methodios Arianisch Interpoliert?” TU 125: 109–14.Google Scholar
Buonaiuti, E. (1921) “The Ethics and Eschatology of Methodius of Olympus,” Harvard Theological Review 14.3: 255–66.Google Scholar
Burrus, V. (1989) “Rhetorical Stereotypes in the Portrait of Paul of Samosata,” Vigiliae Christianae 43.3: 215–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, J. (1998) “Women’s Commensality in the Ancient Greek World,” Greece and Rome 45.2: 143–65.Google Scholar
Bynum, C. (1995) The Resurrection of the Body in Western Christianity, 200–1336. Columbia, OH.Google Scholar
Byron, J. (2011) Cain and Abel in Text and Tradition: Jewish and Christian Interpretations of the First Sibling Rivalry. Leiden.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (1977) Les chœurs de jeunes filles en Grèce Archaïque I. Morphologie, fonction religieuse et sociale. Rome.Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil (2006) “New Themes and Styles in Greek Literature: A Title Revisited,” in Johnson, S. F (ed.), Greek Literature in Late Antiquity: Dynamism, Didacticism, Classicism. Farnham: 11–28.Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil (2016a) “Culture Wars: Late Antiquity and Literature,” in Freu, C, Janniard, S. and Ripoll, A (eds), “Libera Curiositas.” Mélanges d’histoire romaine et d’Antiquité tardive offerts à Jean-Michel Carrié. Bibliothèque de l’Antiquité Tardive 31. Turnhout: 307–16.Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil (2016b) Arguing it out: Discussion in Twelfth-Century Byzantium. Budapest.Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil and Gaul, N. (eds) (2017) Dialogues and Debates from Late Antiquity to Late Byzantium. Abingdon, Oxon.Google Scholar
Candido, F. (2017) “The Symposium of Methodius: A Witness to the Existence of Circles of Christian Women in Asia Minor,” in Bracht, K (ed.), Methodius of Olympus: State of the Art and New Perspectives. Berlin: 103–24.Google Scholar
Carrié, J. and Rousselle, A. (1999) L’Empire Romain en mutation: Des Sévères à Constantin (192–337). Nouvelle Histoire de l’Antiquité 10. Paris: 440–1.Google Scholar
Çevik, N. and Bulut, S. (2008) “The Rediscovery of GAGAE/‘GAXE’ in the South-East Corner of Lycia. New Finds from the Total Surface Surveys,” Adalya 11: 1–41.Google Scholar
Chadwick, H. (1959) “Review of V. Buchheit, Studien zu Methodios von Olympos,” Classical Review 9.3: 289–90.Google Scholar
Chadwick, H. (2001) The Church in Ancient Society: From Galilee to Gregory the Great. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. and Helmbold, W. (eds) (1957) Plutarch. Moralia. Volume XII. Loeb Classical Library 426. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Choub, M. (1984) “Agrapha in St Methodius of Olympus (More Probably – of Philippi),” StPatr 15: 69–70.Google Scholar
Christ, W. and Paranikas, M. (1871) Anthologia Graeca Carminum Christianorum. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Clark, E. and Ferguson, E. (1993) “Editor’s Note,” Journal of Early Christian Studies 1.1: v–vi.Google Scholar
Clark, W. R. (1899) “Methodius,” in Roberts, A., Donaldson, J. and Cox, A. C. (eds), Gregory Thaumaturgus, Dionysius the Great, Julius Africanus, Anatolius and Minor Writers, Methodius, Arnobius. Ante-Nicene Fathers 6. Buffalo, NY: 307–402.Google Scholar
Clarke, G. (1984) “Introduction,” in The Letters of St. Cyprian of Carthage. ACW 43. New York: 3–44.Google Scholar
Clarke, G. (2005) “Third-Century Christianity,” in Bowman, A, Garnsey, C. and Cameron, A. (eds), The Cambridge Ancient History, 2nd ed. XII. The Crisis of Empire, A.D. 193–337. Cambridge: 589–671.Google Scholar
Clement, P. and Hoffleit, H. (1969) Plutarch. Moralia. Volume VIII, Table Talk, Books 1–6. Loeb Classical Library 424. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Collins, D. (2004) Master of the Game: Competition and Performance in Greek Poetry. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Collins, J. (2016) The Apocalyptic Imagination: An Introduction to Jewish Apocalyptic Literature. 3rd ed. Grand Rapids, MI.Google Scholar
Combefis, F. (1644) SS. Patrum Amphilochii Iconiensis, Methodii Patarensis, et Andreae Cretensis: Opera omnia quae reperiri potuerunt. Paris.Google Scholar
Combefis, F. (1672) Bibliothecae Graecorum Patrum Auctarium Novissimum, in quo varia Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum, Antiquioris, Medii et vergentis aevi, Opuscula. Paris.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2001) “Reclaiming the Theatrical in the Second Sophistic,” Helios 28.1: 75–96.Google Scholar
Connolly, S. (2010) Lives Behind the Law: The World of the Codex Hermogenianus. Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
Corcoran, S. (2013) “The Gregorianus and Hermogenianus Assembled and Shattered,” Mélanges de l’École française de Rome – Antiquité 125.2: 285–304.Google Scholar
Corner, S. (2012) “Did ‘Respectable’ Women Attend Symposia?,” Greece and Rome 59.1: 34–45.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. (2019) The Eusebian Canon Tables: Ordering Textual Knowledge in Late Antiquity. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cribiore, R. (2001) The Gymnastics of the Mind: Greek Education in Hellenistic and Roman Egypt. Princeton.Google Scholar
Cribiore, R. (2013) Libanius the Sophist: Rhetoric, Reality, and Religion in the Fourth Century. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Crouzel, H. (1969) Remerciement à Origène, suivi de la lettre d’Origène à Grégoire. SC 148. Paris.Google Scholar
Crouzel, H. (1970) “L’École d’Origène à Césarée. Postscriptum à une éduction de Grégoire le Thaumaturge,” Bulletin de littérature ecclésiastique 71: 15–27.Google Scholar
Crouzel, H. (1972) “Les critiques adressées par Methodius et ses contemporains à la doctrine origenienne du corps ressuscité,” Gregorianum 53.4: 679–716.Google Scholar
Ćurčić, S. (1993) “Late-Antique Palaces: The Meaning of Urban Context,” Ars Orientalis 23: 67–90.Google Scholar
Daley, B. (1986) “The ‘Closed Garden’ and the ‘Sealed Fountain’: Song of Songs 4:12 in the Late Medieval Iconography of Mary,” in E. MacDougall, (ed.), Medieval Gardens. Dumbarton Oaks Colloquium on the History of Landscape Architecture 9. Washington, DC: 255–78.Google Scholar
Daley, B. (1991) The Hope of the Early Church: A Handbook of Patristic Eschatology. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Daly, R. (trans.) (1992) Treatise on the Passover; and, Dialogue of Origen with Heraclides and his Fellow Bishops on the Father, the Son, and the Soul. ACW 54. New YorkGoogle Scholar
Daniélou, J. (1944) Platonisme et théologie mystique: Essai sur la doctrine spirituelle de Saint Grégoire de Nysse. Paris.Google Scholar
Daniélou, J. (1960) From Shadows to Reality: Studies in the Biblical Typology of the Fathers. London.Google Scholar
Danzig, G. (2005) “Intra-Socratic Polemics: The Symposia of Plato and Xenophon,” GRBS 45.4: 331–57.Google Scholar
Davis, S. (2001) The Cult of Saint Thecla: A Tradition of Women’s Piety in Late Antiquity. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dechow, J. (1992) “Origen and Corporeality: The Case of Methodius’ On the Resurrection,” Origeniana Quinta: 509–18.Google Scholar
DelCogliano, M. (2018) “Review of Sophie Cartwright’s The Theological Anthropology of Eustatius of Antioch,” Journal of Religion 98.1: 128–9.Google Scholar
DePalma Digeser, E. (2012) A Threat to Public Piety: Christians, Platonists and the Great Persecution. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
de Riedmatten, H. (1952) Les Actes du procès de Paul de Samosate: Etude sur la christologie du IIIe au IVe siècle. Fribourg.Google Scholar
Dey, H. (2011) The Aurelian Wall and the Refashioning of Imperial Rome, A.D. 271–855. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Diekamp, F. (1928) “Über den Bischofssitz des hl. Methodius,” Theologische Quartalschrift 109: 285–308.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (1973) Iamblichi Chalcidensis: in Platonis Dialogos Commentariorum Fragmenta. Leiden.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (1977) The Middle Platonists: A Study of Platonism 80 B.C. to A.D. 220. London.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. and Polleichtner, W. (2009) Iamblichus of Chalcis: The Letters. Writings from the Greco-Roman World 19. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Dilts, M. and Kennedy, G. (eds) (1997) Two Greek Rhetorical Treatises from the Roman Empire: Introduction, Text, and Translation of the Arts of Rhetoric Attributed to Anonymous Seguerianus and to Apsines of Gadara. Leiden.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. (1959) Porphyrios’ “Symmikta zetemata”: Ihre Stellung in System und Geschichte des Neuplatonismus, nebst einem Kommentar zu den Fragmenten. Munich.Google Scholar
Downie, J. (2013) At the Limits of Art: A Literary Study of Aelius Aristides’ Hieroi Logoi. Oxford.Google Scholar
Drake, H. A. (1976) In Praise of Constantine: A Historical Study and New Translation of Eusebius’ Tricennial Oration. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Dräseke, J. (1892) “Gregorius von Nazianz und sein Verhältnis zum Apollinarismus,” Theologische Studien und Kritiken 65: 473–512.Google Scholar
Drijvers, H. (1964) The Book of the Laws of Countries: Dialogue on Fate of Bardaisan of Edessa. Semitic Texts with Translations 3. Assen.Google Scholar
Droge, A. (1989) Homer or Moses? Early Christian Interpretations of the History of Culture. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Dunbabin, K. (1991) “Triclinium and Stibadium,” in Slater, W (ed.), Dining in a Classical Context. Ann Arbor, MI: 121–48.Google Scholar
Ecker, G. (1995) “Allegorical Gardens of Desire in Modernity: A Gendered Perspective,” in Scott, S. (ed.), The Art of Interpreting. Papers in Art History from the Pennsylvania State University 9. University Park, PA: 260–91.Google Scholar
Ehrhardt, K. (2011) “Eros and Performativity in the Alfresco Symposium: Poetry and Pottery from Greece to Rome.” Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Einarson, B. and De Lacy, P. (1967) Plutarch. Moralia. Volume XIV. Loeb Classical Library 14. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. K. (1993) The Apocryphal New Testament: A Collection of Apocryphal Christian Literature in an English Translation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. (2002) “The Birth of Late Antiquity: Riegl and Strzygowski in 1901,” Art History 25.3: 358–79.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. (2004) “Late Antique Art: The Problem of the Concept and the Cumulative Aesthetic,” in Swain, S and Edwards, M (eds), Approaching Late Antiquity: The Transformation from Early to Late Empire. Oxford: 271–309.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. (2009) “A Protean Corpus,” in Bowie, E and Elsner, J. (eds), Philostratus. Cambridge: 3–18.Google Scholar
Engels, D. and van Nuffelen, P. (eds) (2014) Religion and Competition in Antiquity. Brussels.Google Scholar
Eshleman, K. (2012) The Social World of Intellectuals in the Roman Empire: Sophists, Philosophers, and Christians. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fairbanks, A. (ed.) (1931) Philostratus. Imagines. Philostratus. Imagines. Callistratus. Descriptions. Loeb Classical Library 256. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Farges, J. (1929) Les idées morales et religieuses de Méthode d’Olympe: Contribution à l’étude des rapports du Christianisme et de l’Hellénisme à la fin du troisième siècle. Paris.Google Scholar
Feltoe, C. L. (1904) ΔΙΟΝΥΣΙΟΥ ΛΕΙΨΑΝΑ: The Letters and Other Remains of Dionysius of Alexandria. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fendt, L. (1911) Dionysius Areopagita, Gregorius Thaumaturgus, Methodius von Olympus, aus dem Griechischen übersetzt. Munich.Google Scholar
Fendt, L. (1911) Des Heiligen Methodius von Olympus Gastmahl oder die Jungfräulichkeit. Bibliothek der Kirchenvater 2–3. Kempten.Google Scholar
Ferrarese, G. (1984) “Valore della legge ed autorità degli Apostoli. Act. 15,1-29 in Metodio di Olimpo,” Koinonia 8: 173–81.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, J. and White, L. M. (1983) The Tabula of Cebes. Texts and Translations 24, Graeco-Roman Religion Series 7. Chico, CA.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (2008) “The Beginnings of Dialogue: Socratic Discourses and Fourth-Century Prose,” in Goldhill, S. (ed.), The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Cambridge: 29–44.Google Scholar
Formisano, M. (2007) “Towards an Aesthetic Paradigm of Late Antiquity,” An Tard 15: 277–84.Google Scholar
Fowler, A. (1982) Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (1997) “Second Thoughts on Closure,” in Roberts, D, Dunn, F. and Fowler, D. (eds), Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton: 3–22.Google Scholar
Franchi, R. (2007) “Ispirazione biblica (Gn. 1,26) e linguaggio filosofico-pagano in un passo del ‘De autexusio’ di Methodio d’Olimpo,” VetChr 44.2: 239–56.Google Scholar
Franchi, R. (2009) “Il mare in tempesta nel De autexousio di Metodio d’Olimpo e nell’Hexaemeron di Giorgio di Pisidia,” ByzZ 102.1: 65–82.Google Scholar
Frankfurter, D. (1996) “The Legacy of Jewish Apocalypses in Early Christianity: Regional Trajectories,” in VanderKam, J. C and Adler, W (eds), The Jewish Apocalyptic Heritage in Early Christianity. Assen: 129–200.Google Scholar
Freedman, D. and Miano, D. (2005) “Non-Acrostic Alphabetic Psalms,” in Flint, P. W and Miller, P. D. (eds), The Book of Psalms: Composition and Reception. Leiden: 87–96.Google Scholar
Friedrich, A. (2002) Das Symposium der XII Sapientes: Kommentar und Verfasserfrage. Berlin.Google Scholar
Furley, W. and Bremer, J. (2001) Greek Hymns: Selected Cult Songs from the Archaic to the Hellenistic Period. 2 vols. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Fyfe, W. H. (trans.) and Russell, D. (rev.) (1995) Longinus. On the Sublime. LCL 199. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Gafni, I. (2006) “The Political, Social, and Economic History of Babylonian Jewry, 224–638 CE,” in Katz, S (ed.), The Cambridge History of Judaism, IV. The Late Roman-Rabbinic Period. Cambridge: 792–820.Google Scholar
Galland, A. (1767) Bibliotheca Veterum Patrum antiquorumque scriptorum ecclesiasticorum Graeco-Latina, III (Patrologia Graeca 18). Venice.Google Scholar
Gallardo, M. D. (1972) “Los Simposios de Luciano, Ateneo, Metodio y Juliano,” Cuadernos de filologia clasica IV: 239–96.Google Scholar
Garstad, B. (ed. and trans.) (2012) Apocalypse. Pseudo-Methodius. An Alexandrian World Chronicle. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Gärtner, U. (2005) Quintus Smyrnaeus und die “Aeneis”: Zur Nachwirkung Vergils in der grieschischen Literatur der Kaiserzeit. Munich.Google Scholar
Garzya, A. and Masullo, R. (eds) (2004) I Problemi di Cassio Iatrosofista. Testo Critico, Introduzione, Apparato Critico, Traduzione e Note. Naples.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. (1986) “Festive Satire: Julian’s Misopogon and the New Year at Antioch,” The Journal of Roman Studies 76: 106–19.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. (1995) Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1995) Foucault’s Virginity: Ancient Erotic Fiction and the History of Sexuality. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Golega, J. (1960) Der homerische Psalter: Studien über die dem Apolinarios von Laodikeia zugeschriebene Psalmenparaphrase. Staffelsee.Google Scholar
Gómez, P. and Jufresa, M. (2010) “Liucia a taula: aliments i simposi,” in Mestre, F. and Gómez, P. (eds), Lucian of Samosata: Greek Writer and Roman Citizen. Barcelona: 99–113.Google Scholar
Goodblatt, D. (2006a) “The Political and Social History of the Jewish Community in the Land of Israel, c. 235–638,” in Katz, S (ed.), The Cambridge History of Judaism, IV. The Late Roman-Rabbinic Period. Cambridge: 404–30.Google Scholar
Goodblatt, D. (2006b) “The History of the Babylonian Academies,” in Katz, S (ed.), The Cambridge History of Judaism, IV. The Late Roman-Rabbinic Period. Cambridge: 821–39.Google Scholar
Gordley, M. (2011) Teaching through Song: Didactic Hymnody among Greeks, Romans, Jews, and Christians. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Görgemanns, H. (2009) “Symposium Literature,” in Salazar, C. and Gentry, F. G. (eds), Brill’s New Pauly, XIV. Sym-Tub. Leiden: 10–13.Google Scholar
Grafton, A. and Williams, M. (2006) Christianity and the Book: Origen, Eusebius and the Library of Caesarea. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Granholm, P. (2012) “Alciphron: Letters of the Courtesans. Edited with Introduction, Translation and Commentary.” Unpublished PhD thesis. Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Greensmith, E. (2018) “Homer in the Perfect Tense: The Posthomerica of Quintus Smyrnaeus and the Poetics of Impersonation.” Unpublished dissertation. University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Greer, R. and Mitchell, M. (eds) (2007) The “Belly-Myther” of Endor: Interpretations of 1 Kingdoms 28 in the Early Church. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. and Barnes, J. (eds) (1989) Philosophia Togata I: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford.Google Scholar
Griffith, S. (2006) ‘‘St. Ephraem, Bar Daysān and the Clash of Madrāshê in Aram: Readings in St. Ephraem’s Hymni contra Haereses’’, The Harp 21: 447–72.Google Scholar
Grusková, J. (2010) Untersuchungen zu den griechischen Palimpsesten der Österreichischen Nationalbibliothek. Vienna.Google Scholar
Grusková, J. and Martin, G. (2014) “Ein neues Textstück aus den Scythica Vindobonensia. Zu den Ereignissen nach der Eroberung von Philippopolis,” Tyche 29: 29–43.Google Scholar
Grusková, J. and Martin, G. (2015) “Zum Angriff der Goten unter Kniva auf eine thrakische Stadt (Scythica Vindobonensia, f. 195v) (Taf. 9–11),” Tyche 30: 35–54.Google Scholar
Guignard, C. (2012) “Un passage de Methode d’Olympe parmi des extraits agricoles,” Augustinianum 52.1: 155–8.Google Scholar
Hagg, T. (1992) “Hierocles the Lover of Truth and Eusebius the Sophist,” SO 67: 144–50.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (ed.) (1995) Aristotle. Poetics. Longinus. On the Sublime. Demetrius. On Style. Loeb Classical Library 199. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (ed.) (2002) The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. Princeton.Google Scholar
Halperin, D. (1990) “Why is Diotima a Woman? Platonic Eros and the Figuration of Gender,” in Halperin, D., Winkler, J. and Zeitlin, F. (eds), Before Sexuality: The Construction of Erotic Experience in the Ancient Greek World. Princeton: 257–308.Google Scholar
Halton, T. (trans.) (1999) Saint Jerome. On Illustrious Men. Fathers of the Church 100. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Hanson, R. (1959) Allegory and Event: A Study of the Sources and Significance of Origen’s Interpretation of Scripture. London.Google Scholar
Harper, K. (2017) The Fate of Rome: Climate, Disease and the End of an Empire. Princeton.Google Scholar
Hartog, P. (2017) Pesher and Hypomnema: A Comparison of Two Commentary Traditions from the Hellenistic-Roman Period. Leiden.Google Scholar
Hay, D. M. (ed.) (1991) Both Literal and Allegorical: Studies in Philo of Alexandria’s Questions and Answers on Genesis and Exodus. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Heath, T. (1910) Diophantus of Alexandria: A Study in the History of Algebra. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Heath, M. (2002) “BMCR review of Irmgard Männlein-Robert, Longin Philologe und Philosoph. Eine Interpetation der Erhaltenen Zeugnisse,” Bryn Mawr Classical Review. March 18. Online at http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2002/2002-03-18.htmlGoogle Scholar
Heiberg, J. L. (1901) “Anatolius sur les dix premiers nombres,” Annales Internationales d’Histoire. Congrès de Paris 1900. 5e Section Histoire des Sciences. Paris: 27–57.Google Scholar
Heine, R. (2004) “The Beginnings of Latin Christian Literature,” in Young, F., Ayres, L. and Louth, A. (eds), The Cambridge History of Early Christian Literature. Cambridge: 131–41.Google Scholar
Heinevetter, F. (1912) Würfel- und Buchstabenorakel in Griechenland und Kleinasien. Breslau.Google Scholar
Heitsch, E. (1961–4) Die Griechischen Dichterfragmente der Römischen Kaiserzeit. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Hellenkemper, H. and Hild, F. (2004) Lykien und Pamphylien. Tabula Imperii Byzantini 8. 3 vols. Vienna.Google Scholar
Hellholm, D. (1986) “The Problem of Apocalyptic Genre and the Apocalypse of John,” Semeia 39: 13–64.Google Scholar
Herman, G. (ed.) (2014) Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians: Religious Dynamics in a Sasanian Context. Piscataway, NJ.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, E. and Guyer, S. (1930) Monumenta Asiae Minoris Antiqua, II. Meriamlik und Korykos: Zwei Christliche Ruinenstatten des Rauhen Kilikiens. Manchester.Google Scholar
Heslin, P. J. (2005) The Transvestite Achilles: Gender and Genre in Statius’ Achilleid. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hicks, R. (ed.) (1925) Diogenes Laertius. Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Loeb Classical Library 184–5. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Hill, C. (2001) Regnum Caelorum: Patterns of Millennial Thought in Early Christianity. Grand Rapids, MI.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hobden, F. (2004) “How to be a Good Symposiast and Other Lessons from Xenophon’s Symposium,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 50: 121–40.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, M. (1966) Der Dialog bei den Christlichen Schriftstellern der Ersten Vier Jahrhunderte. TU 96. Berlin.Google Scholar
Holden, J. H. (2009) Porphyry the Philosopher: Introduction to the Tetrabiblos and Serapio of Alexandria, Astrological Definitions. Tempe, AZ.Google Scholar
Holl, K. (1899) Fragmente vornicänischer Kirchenväter aus den Sacra Parallela. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Honoré, A. (1994) Emperors and Lawyers: Completely Revised with a Palingenesia of Third-Century Imperial Rescripts, 193–305. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hösle, V. (2012) The Philosophical Dialogue: A Poetics and a Hermeneutics. Notre Dame, IN.Google Scholar
Howland, J. (1991) “Re-reading Plato: The Problem of Platonic Chronology,” Phoenix 45: 189–214.Google Scholar
Hughes, A. B. (2013) “‘Chastely I Live for Thee’: Virginity as Bondage and Freedom in Origen of Alexandria, Methodius of Olympus, and Gregory of Nyssa.” Unpublished PhD thesis. Wheaton College.Google Scholar
Hurst, A. and Rudhardt, J. (1999) Papyri Bodmer XXX-XXXVII: “Codex des Visions” poèmes divers. Munich.Google Scholar
Ibbetson, D. (2005) “High Classical Law,” in Bowman, A, Garnsey, C. and Cameron, A. (eds), The Cambridge Ancient History, 2nd ed. XII. The Crisis of Empire, A.D. 193–337. Cambridge: 184–99.Google Scholar
Jahn, A. (1865) S. Methodii Opera. Et S. Methodius Platonizans. 2 vols. Halis Saxonum.Google Scholar
James, E. (2008) “The Rise and Function of the Concept of ‘Late Antiquity’,” Journal of Late Antiquity 1.1: 20–30.Google Scholar
Janiszewski, P. (2006) The Missing Link: Greek Pagan Historiography in the Second Half of the Third Century and in the Fourth Century AD. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Jażdżewska, K. (2015) “Dialogic Format of Philo of Alexandria’s De Animalibus,” Eos 102: 45–56.Google Scholar
Jeanneret, M. (1991) A Feast of Words: Banquets and Table Talk in the Renaissance. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. (2013) Religion and Identity in Porphyry of Tyre: The Limits of Hellenism in Late Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. (2017) “Early Christianity and the Classical Tradition,” in Richter, D. S. and Johnson, W. A. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Second Sophistic. Oxford: 625–38.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. and Schott, J. (eds) (2013) Eusebius of Caesarea: Tradition and Innovations. Hellenic Studies Series 60. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. (2005) “Epiclassical Law,” in Bowman, A, Garnsey, C. and Cameron, A. (eds), The Cambridge Ancient History, 2nd ed. XII. The Crisis of Empire, A.D. 193–337. Cambridge: 200–11.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. F. (ed.) (2006a) Greek Literature in Late Antiquity: Dynamism, Didacticism, Classicism. Farnham.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. F. (ed.) (2006b) The Life and Miracles of Thekla: A Literary Study. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Jones, A. H. M. (1964) The Later Roman Empire 284–604: A Social, Economic and Administrative Survey. 3 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. (ed.) (2006) Philostratus: Apollonius of Tyana, III. Letters of Apollonius, Ancient Testimonia, Eusebius’s Reply to Hierocles. Loeb Classical Library 458. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Jouravel, A. (2017) “Beobachtungen zu Methodius’ Schrift De lepra,” in Bracht, K (ed.), Methodius of Olympus: State of the Art and New Perspectives. Berlin: 207–35.Google Scholar
Jufresa, M. (1969a) “Influencias platónicas en el Banquete de Metodio de Olimpo,” Scriptorium Victoriense 16: 5–33.Google Scholar
Jufresa, M. (1969b) “Los títulos cristológicos en la obra de Metodio di Olimpo,” Scriptorium Victoriense 16: 135–40.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. (1990) “Felix Hymenaeus: A Study of Greek and Roman Epithalamia through the Fourth Century A.D.” Unpublished dissertation. Catholic University of America.Google Scholar
Kalim, R. (2006) Jewish Babylonia between Persia and Roman Palestine: Decoding the Literary Record. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kalish, K. (2009) “Greek Christian Poetry in Classical Forms: The Codex of Visions from the Bodmer Papyri and the Melding of Literary Traditions.” Unpublished PhD thesis. Princeton University.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. (1988) Guardians of Language: The Grammarian and Society in Late Antiquity. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. (2014) Macrobius. Saturnalia. 3 vols. Loeb Classical Library 510. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Katz, S. (2006) The Cambridge History of Judaism, IV. The Late Roman-Rabbinic Period. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kechagia, E. (2011a) Plutarch Against Colotes: A Lesson in History of Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kechagia, E. (2011b) “Philosophy in Plutarch’s Table Talk: In Jest or in Earnest?” in Klotz, F and Oikonomopoulou, K (eds), The Philosopher’s Banquet: Plutarch’s Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire. Oxford: 77–104.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. and Rabe, H. (eds) (2005) Invention and Method: Two Rhetorical Treatises from the Hermogenic Corpus. Leiden.Google Scholar
Kessels, A. H. M. and van der Horst, P. W. (1987) “The Vision of Dorotheus (Pap. Bodmer 29): Edited with Introduction, Translation and Notes,” Vigiliae Christianae 41.4: 313–59.Google Scholar
Keunen, B. (2010) “The Chronotope Imagination in Literature and Film: Bakhtin, Bergson and Deluze on Forms of Time,” in Bemong, N. et al. (eds), Bakhtin’s Theory of Literary Chronotope: Reflections, Applications, Perspectives. Gent: 35–55.Google Scholar
Keunen, B. (2011) Time and Imagination: Chronotopes in Western Narrative Culture. Evanstown, IL.Google Scholar
Kim, L. (2009) “Historical Fiction, Brachylogy, and Plutarch’s Banquet of the Seven Sages,” in Ribeiro Ferreira, J., Leão, D., Tröster, M and Barata Dias, P. (eds) Symposion and Philanthropia in Plutarch. Coimbra: 481–96.Google Scholar
Kim, L. (2010) Homer between History and Fiction in Imperial Greek Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kim, L. (2017) “Atticism and Asianism,” in Richter, D. S. and Johnson, W. A. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Second Sophistic. Oxford: 42–66.Google Scholar
King, C. W. (ed.) (1888) Julian the Emperor, Containing Gregory Nazianzen’s Two Invectives and Libanius’ Monody with Julian’s Extant Theosophical Works. London.Google Scholar
Klijn, A. (2003) Acts of Thomas: Introduction, Text and Commentary. 2nd revised ed. Leiden.Google Scholar
Klimkeit, H.-J. (1993) Gnosis on the Silk Road: Gnostic Texts from Central Asia. New York.Google Scholar
Klotz, F. (2011) “Imagining the Past: Plutarch’s Play with Time,” in Klotz, F and Oikonomopoulou, K (eds), The Philosopher’s Banquet: Plutarch’s Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire. Oxford: 161–78.Google Scholar
Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds) (2011) The Philosopher’s Banquet: Plutarch’s Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar
König, J. (2007) “Fragmentation and Coherence in Plutarch’s Sympotic Questions,” in König, J. and Whitmarsh, T. (eds), Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire. Cambridge: 43–68.Google Scholar
König, J. (2008) “Sympotic Dialogue in the First to Fifth Centuries CE,” in Goldhill, S. (ed.), The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Cambridge: 85–114.Google Scholar
König, J. (2011) “Self-Promotion and Self-Effacement in Plutarch’s Table Talk,” in Klotz, F and Oikonomopoulou, K (eds), The Philosopher’s Banquet: Plutarch’s Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire. Oxford: 179–203.Google Scholar
König, J. (2012) Saints and Symposiasts: The Literature of Food and the Symposium in Greco-Roman and Early Christian Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
König, J. and Whitmarsh, T. (eds) (2007) Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2011) “Alciphron and the Invention of Pornography,” in Lambert, S. (ed.), Sociable Man: Essays on Ancient Greek Social Behaviour in Honour of Nick Fisher. Swansea: 323–35.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. and Ramelli, I. (2014) “The Novel and Christian Narrative,” in Cueva, E and Byrne, S. (eds), A Companion to the Ancient Novel. Chichester: 180–98.Google Scholar
Körner, C. (2002) “Die Rede Εἰς βασιλέα des Pseudo-Aelius Aristides,” Museum Helveticum 59: 211–28.Google Scholar
Kovacs, D. (1995) Euripides. Children of Heracles, Hippolytus, Andromache, Hecuba. Loeb Classical Library 484. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. and Stray, C. (2015) Classical Commentaries: Explorations in a Scholarly Genre. Oxford.Google Scholar
LaValle Norman, D. (2017a) “Coming Late to the Table: Methodius in the Context of Sympotic Literary Development,” in Bracht, K (ed.), Methodius of Olympus: State of the Art and New Perspectives. Berlin: 18–37.Google Scholar
LaValle Norman, D. (2017b) “Feasting at the End: The Eschatological Symposia of Methodius of Olympus and Julian the Apostate,” StPatr 94.20: 269–84.Google Scholar
LaValle Norman, D. (2019) “Becoming Female: Marrowy Semen and the Formative Mother in Methodius of Olympus’ Symposium,” Journal of Early Christian Studies 27.2.Google Scholar
LaValle Norman, D. (forthcoming) “The Rise of Courtroom Rhetoric in Late Antique Philosophical Dialogues,” in Elsner, J and Jolowicz, D. (eds), Articulating Resistance Under the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lawlor, H. J. and Oulton, J. E. L. (1927) Eusebius Bishop of Caesarea, Ecclesiastical History and the Martyrs of Palestine. 2 vols. London.Google Scholar
Lazzati, , G. (1937) “La tecnica dialogica nel simposio di Metodio d’Olimpo,” in Studi Ubaldi. Milan: 117–24.Google Scholar
Le Boulluec, A. (1987) “L’Ecole d’Alexandrie: De quelques aventures d’un concept historiographique,” in Alexandrina: hellenisme, judaisme et christianisme à Alexandrie: Mélanges offerts au P. Claude Mondesert. Paris: 403–17.Google Scholar
Levey, I. (1975) “Caesarea and the Jews,” Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. Supplementary Studies 19: 43–78.Google Scholar
Leyerle, B. (2001) Ascetical Shows and Ascetic Lives: John Chrysostom’s Attack on Spiritual Marriage. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lietzmann, H. (1904) Apollinaris von Laodicea und Seine Schule. Texte und Untersuchungen. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Lim, R. (1991) “Theodoret of Cyrus and Speakers in Greek Dialogues,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 111: 181–2.Google Scholar
Lim, R. (1995) Public Disputation, Power and Social Order in Late Antiquity. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lim, R. (2008) “Christians, Dialogue and Patterns of Sociability in Late Antiquity,” in Goldhill, S. (ed.), The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Cambridge: 151–72.Google Scholar
Livrea, E. (2002) “Poema epico-storico attribuito a Soterico di Oasis,” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 138: 17–30.Google Scholar
Long, A. (2008) “Plato’s Dialogues and a Common Rationale for Dialogue Form,” in Goldhill, S. (ed.), The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Cambridge: 45–60.Google Scholar
Long, J. (2006) “Julian Augustus’ Julius Caesar,” in M. Wyke, (ed.), Julius Caesar in Western Culture. Oxford: 62–82.Google Scholar
Lucà, S. (1984) “Un nuovo testimone del Banchetto di Metodio d’Olimpo,” OCP 50: 446–50.Google Scholar
Lukinovich, A. (1990) “The Play of Reflections between Literary Form and the Sympotic Theme in the Deipnosophistae of Athenaeus,” in Murray, O (ed.), Sympotica. A Symposium on the Symposion. Oxford: 263–71.Google Scholar
Lutz, C. (1947) “Musonius Rufus: ‘The Roman Socrates’,” Yale Classical Studies 10: 3–147.Google Scholar
Macías, C. and González, M. (2005) “El ‘Banquete’ de Metodio de Olimpo y sus argumentos contra la astrología,” Mene 5: 307–41.Google Scholar
Maciver, C. A. (2007) “Returning to the Mountain of Arete: Reading Ecphrasis, Constructing Ethics in Quintus Smyrnaeus’ Posthomerica,” in Baumbach, M. and Bär, S. (eds), Quintus Smyrnaeus: Transforming Homer in Second Sophistic Epic. Berlin: 259–84.Google Scholar
Maciver, C. A. (2012) Quintus Smyrnaeus’ Posthomerica: Engaging Homer in Late Antiquity. Leiden.Google Scholar
Mackie, C. J. (2013) “Iliad 24 and the Judgement of Paris,” Classical Quarterly 63.1: 1–16.Google Scholar
Maclean, J. B. and Aitken, E. B. (trans.) (2001) Flavius Philostratus: Heroicus. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
MacPhail, J. (2011) Porphyry’s Homeric Questions on the Iliad: Text, Translation, Commentary. Berlin.Google Scholar
Magny, A. (2014) Porphyry in Fragments: Reception of an Anti-Christian Text in Late Antiquity. Farnham.Google Scholar
Mallan, C. and Davenport, C. (2015) “Dexippus and the Gothic Invasions: Interpreting the New Vienna fragment (Codex Vindobonensis Hist. gr. 73, ff, 192v–193r),” JRS 105: 203–26.Google Scholar
Männlein-Robert, I. (2001) Longin Philologe und Philosoph. Eine Interpretation der Erhaltenen Zeugnisse. Berlin.Google Scholar
Marcone, A. (2008) “A Long Late Antiquity? Considerations on a Controversial Periodization,” Journal of Late Antiquity 1.1: 4–19.Google Scholar
Marcus, R. (1947) “Alphabetic Acrostics in the Hellenistic and Roman Period,” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 6: 109–15.Google Scholar
Margheritis, M. (1937) “L’influenza di Platone sul Pensiero e sull’Arte di S. Metodio d’Olimpo,” Studi Ubaldi. Milan: 117–24.Google Scholar
Maur, H. J. (1977) Das Psalmenverständnis des Ambrosius von Miland: Ein Beitrag zum Deutungshintergrund der Psalmenverwendung im Gottesdienst der Alten Kirche. Leiden.Google Scholar
Mayer, E. (2013) “Rome, City of: 8. Tetrarchic,” in The Encyclopedia of Ancient History. Hoboken, NJ: 1–6.Google Scholar
Mazzucco, C. (1985) “Tra l’ombra e la realtà. L’Apocalisse nel Simposio di Metodio di Olimpo,” Civiltà Classica e Cristiana 6: 399–423.Google Scholar
Mazzucco, C. (1986) “Il millenarismo di Metodio di Olimpo di fronte a Origene. Polemica o continuità?” Augustinianum 26: 73–87.Google Scholar
McClure, L. (1999) Spoken like a Woman: Speech and Gender in Athenian Drama. Princeton.Google Scholar
McClure, L. (2003) Courtesans at Table: Gender and Greek Literary Culture in Athenaeus. London.Google Scholar
McGinn, B. (2009) “Turning Points in Early Christian Apocalypse Exegesis,” in R. Daly, (ed.), Apocalyptic Thought in Early Christianity. Ada, MI: 81–105.Google Scholar
McKeon, R. (1951–2) “Symposia,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philological Association 25: 18–41.Google Scholar
McVey, K. (1999) “Were the Earliest Madrāšē Songs or Recitations?” in Reinink, G. J. and Klugkist, A. C. (eds), After Bardaisan: Studies on Continuity and Change in Syriac Christianity in Honour of Professor Han J. W. Drijvers. Leuven: 185–200.Google Scholar
Mejzner, M. (2017) “Methodius: Millenarist or Anti-Millenarist?,” in Bracht, K (ed.), Methodius of Olympus: State of the Art and New Perspectives. Berlin: 63–84.Google Scholar
Miguélez Cavero, L. (2008) Poems in Context: Greek Poetry in the Egyptian Thebaid 200–600 AD. Berlin.Google Scholar
Miguélez Cavero, L. (2013) Triphiodorus, The Sack of Troy: A General Study and a Commentary. Berlin.Google Scholar
Miles, G. (2005) “Music and Immortality: The Afterlife of Achilles in Philostratus’ Heroicus,” AncNarr 4: 66–78.Google Scholar
Millar, F. (1969) “P. Herrenius Dexippus: The Greek World and the Third-Century Invasions,” JRS 59.1/2: 12–29.Google Scholar
Millar, F. (1971) “Paul of Samosata, Zenobia and Aurelian: The Church, Local Culture and Political Allegiance in Third-Century Syria,” Journal of Roman Studies 61: 1–12.Google Scholar
Millar, F. (2006) Rome, the Greek World, and the East, III. The Greek World, the Jews and the East. Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Minar, E., Sandbach, F. and Helmbold, W. (1961) Plutarch. Moralia. Volume IX: Table-Talk, Books 7–9. Dialogue on Love. Loeb Classical Library 425. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Minns, D. and Parvis, P. (2009) Justin, Philosopher and Martyr. Apologies. Edited with a Commentary on the Text. Oxford.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. (2007) A History of the Later Roman Empire AD 284–641: The Transformation of the Roman World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1963) “Pagan and Christian Historiography in the Fourth Century AD,” in Momigliano, (ed.), The Conflict between Paganism and Christianity in the Fourth Century. Oxford: 79–99. [Reprinted in Essays in Ancient and Modern Historiography. Oxford, 1977: 107–26.]Google Scholar
Moore, J. (trans.) (1957) “Ajax,” in Grene, D and Lattimore, R (eds), The Complete Greek Tragedies. Sophocles II. Ajax. The Women of Trachis. Electra. Philoctetes. Chicago: 1–62.Google Scholar
Morehouse, R. J. (2013) “Bar Daysān and Mani in Ephraem the Syrian’s Heresiography.” Unpublished dissertation. Catholic University of America.Google Scholar
Moreschini, C. and Norelli, E. (2005) Early Christian Greek and Latin Literature: A Literary History. 2 vols. Peabody, MA.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. (2001) “The Miscellany and Plutarch,” in Klotz, F and Oikonomopoulou, K (eds), The Philosopher’s Banquet: Plutarch’s Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire. Oxford: 49–76.Google Scholar
Morrow, G. (ed.) (1970) Proclus. A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements. Princeton.Google Scholar
Moss, C. (2010) “On the Dating of Polycarp: Rethinking the Place of the Martyrdom of Polycarp in the History of Christianity,” Early Christianity 1.4: 539–74.Google Scholar
Moss, J. (2012) Aristotle on the Apparent Good: Perception, Phantasia, Thought and Desire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Mossman, J. (1997) “Plutarch’s Dinner of the Seven Wise Men and its Place in Symposion Literature,” in Mossman, (ed.), Plutarch and his Intellectual World. London: 119–40.Google Scholar
Mossman, J. (2005) “Plutarch on Animals: Rhetorical Strategies in De Sollertia Animalium,” Hermanthena 179: 141–63.Google Scholar
Most, G. (2005) “More on Commentaries,” in M.-O. Goulet-Cazé (ed.), Le Commentaire entre tradition et innovation. Actes du colloque International de l’Institut des Traditions Textuelles, Classical Review 55.1: 169–71.Google Scholar
Müller, F. (1998) Die Beiden Satiren des Kaisers Julianus Apostata (Symposion oder Caesares und Antiochikos oder Misopogon). Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Murray, P. and Wilson, P. (eds) (2004) Music and the Muses. The Culture of Mousike in the Classical Athenian City. Oxford.Google Scholar
Musurillo, H. (1957) “History and Symbol. A Study of Form in Early Christian Literature,” ThS 18: 357–86.Google Scholar
Nails, D. (1993) “Problems with Vlastos’s Platonic Developmentalism,” Ancient Philosophy 13.2: 273–91.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. (1995) Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Norman, A. P. (trans.) (2001) Antioch as a Centre of Hellenic Culture as Observed by Libanius. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Nugent, R. (1941) Portrait of the Consecrated Woman in Greek Christian Literature of the First Four Centuries. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2001) The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Oikonomopoulou, A. (2007) “The Symposium in the Greek and Roman World of the High Empire; Literary Forms and Intellectual Realities.” Unpublished DPhil thesis. University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Oikonomopoulou, A. (2011) “Peripatetic Knowledge in Plutarch’s Table Talk,” in Klotz, F and Oikonomopoulou, K (eds), The Philosopher’s Banquet: Plutarch’s Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire. Oxford: 105–30.Google Scholar
Olshausen, E. (2006) “Makaron Nesoi,” in Cancik, H., Schneider, H. and Salazar, C. (eds), Brill’s New Pauly, VIII. Lyd–Mine. Leiden: 192–3.Google Scholar
Olson, S. (2007–12) Athenaeus. The Learned Banqueters. Loeb Classical Library 204, 208, 224, 235, 274, 327, 345, 519. 8 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Orbe, A. (1969) “S. Metodio y la exegesis de Rom. 7,9a, Ego autem vivebam sine lege aliquando,” Gregorianum 50: 93–139.Google Scholar
Otis, B. (1958) “Cappadocian Thought as a Coherent System,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 12: 95–124.Google Scholar
Oulton, J. (ed.) (1932) Eusebius. The Ecclesiastical History. Volume II. Loeb Classical Library 265. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Oulton, J. and Chadwick, H. (1954) Alexandrian Christianity: Selected Translations of Clement and Origen with Introduction and Notes. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Pack, R. (1946) “Notes on the Caesars of Julian,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 77: 151–7.Google Scholar
Papadoyannakis, Y. (2006) “Instruction by Question and Answer: The Case of Late Antique and Byzantine Erotapokriseis,” in Johnson, S. F (ed.), Greek Literature in Late Antiquity: Dynamism, Didacticism, Classicism. Farnham: 91–105.Google Scholar
Paton, W. R. (ed.) (1916) The Greek Anthology. Loeb Classical Library 67, 68, 84, 85, 86. 5 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Patterson, L. G. (1989) “Who are the Opponents in Methodius’ res.?,” StPatr 19: 221–9.Google Scholar
Patterson, L. G. (1997) Methodius of Olympus: Divine Sovereignty, Human Freedom, and Life in Christ. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Paulas, J. (2008) “Athenaeus and the Advantages of Philology.” Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Payne, R. (2015) A State of Mixture: Christians, Zoroastrians, and Iranian Political Culture in Late Antiquity. Oakland, CA.Google Scholar
Pearse, R. (2010) Eusebius of Caesarea, Gospel Problems and Solutions. Quaestiones ad Stephanum et Marinum. CPG 3470. Ipswich.Google Scholar
Pepin, J. (1975) “Platonisme et Stoicisme chez Methode d’Olympe,” in Forma Futuri: Studi in onore del Cardinale Michele Pellegrino. Turin: 126–44.Google Scholar
Perrin, B. (ed.) (1919) Plutarch. Lives. Demosthenes and Cicero. Alexander and Caesar. Loeb Classical Library 99. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Pickstock, C. (1998) After Writing: On the Liturgical Consummation of Philosophy. Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
Pietersma, A. (1995) “The Acrostic Poems of Lamentations in Greek Translation,” in Greenspoon, L. and Munnich, O. (eds), VIII Congress of the IOSCS, Paris 1992. Atlanta, GA: 183–201.Google Scholar
Plass, P. (1964) “Philosophic Anonymity and Irony in the Platonic Dialogues,” American Journal of Philology 85: 254–78.Google Scholar
Platt, V. (2009) “Virtual Visions: Phantasia and the Perception of the Divine in the Life of Apollonius of Tyana,” in Bowie, E and Elsner, J. (eds), Philostratus. Cambridge: 131–54.Google Scholar
Plumpe, J. C. (1943) Mater Ecclesia: An Inquiry into the Concept of the Church as Mother in Early Christianity. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Potter, D. S. (1990) Prophesy and History in the Crisis of the Roman Empire: A Historical Commentary on the Thirteenth Sibylline Oracle. Oxford.Google Scholar
Press, G. A. (ed.) (2000) Who Speaks for Plato? Studies in Platonic Anonymity. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Pretty, R. A. (ed.) (1997) Adamantius: Dialogue on the True Faith in God (De Recta in Deum Fide). Leuven.Google Scholar
Price, R. and Gaddis, M. (2007) The Acts of the Council of Chalcedon: Volume 1. Translated Texts for Historians 45. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Prinzivalli, E. (1983) “Il simbolismo del sangue in Metodio di Olimpo,” Atti della Settimana Snague e Antropologia nella Letteratura Cristiana (Rome) 3: 1181–92.Google Scholar
Prinzivalli, E. (1992) “Donna e Generazione nei Padri della Chiesa,” in M. Umberto, (ed.), La donna nel pensiero cristiano antico. Genoa.Google Scholar
Prinzivalli, E. (1998a) “Desiderio di generazione e generazione del desiderio: Metodio di Olimpo e le polemiche sull’eros fra III e IV secolo,” in S. Pricoco, (ed.), L’eros difficile: Amore e sessualita nell’antico cristianesimo. Biblioteca di Storia e Cultura Religiosa 9. Rubbettino: 39–66.Google Scholar
Prinzivalli, E. (1998b) “Il millenarismo in Oriente da Metodio ad Apollinare,” Annali di Storia dell’Esegesi 15.1: 125–51.Google Scholar
Prinzivalli, A., Crouzel, H. and Bresard, L. (eds) (1995) Origène. Homélies sur les Psaumes 36 à 38. ParisGoogle Scholar
Quesnell, K. (1953) Die wahre kirchliche Stellung und Tätigkeit des fälschlich so gennanten Bischofs Methodius von Olympos. Unpublished PhD thesis. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Quiroga, A. (2007) “From Sophistopolis to Episcopolis: The Case for a Third Sophistic,” Journal for Late Antique Religion and Culture 1: 31–42.Google Scholar
Ramelli, I. (2008) “L’Inno a Cristo-Logos nel Simposio di Metodio di Olimpo: Alle origini della poesia filosofica cristiana,” in Incontro di studiosi dell’Antichità cristiana, Roma, Augustinianum, 4–6 Maggio 2007. Rome: 257–80.Google Scholar
Ramelli, I. (2009) Bardaisan of Edessa: A Reassessment of the Evidence and a New Interpretation. Piscataway, NJ.Google Scholar
Reardon, B. P. (1984) “The Second Sophistic,” in W. Treadgold, (ed.), Renaissances Before the Renaissance: Cultural Revivals of Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Stanford, CA: 23–41.Google Scholar
Reinick, G. J. (1992) “Pseudo-Methodius: A Concept of History in Response to the Rise of Islam” in Cameron, Averil and Conrad, L. (eds), The Byzantine and Early Islamic Near East, I. Problems in the Literary Source Material. Princeton: 149–87.Google Scholar
Relihan, J. (1992) “Rethinking the History of the Literary Symposium,” Illinois Classical Studies 17.2: 213–44.Google Scholar
Relihan, J. (2005) “Late Arrivals: Julian and Boethius,” in K. Freudenburg, (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire. Cambridge: 109–22.Google Scholar
Richter, D. S. and Johnson, W. A. (eds) (2017) The Oxford Handbook of the Second Sophistic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Riggi, C. (1975) “Vita cristiana e dialogo liturgico nel Simposio di Metodio,” Salesianum 37: 503–45.Google Scholar
Riggi, C. (1976) “Teologia della storia nel Simposio di Metodio di Olimpo,” Augustinianum 16: 61–84.Google Scholar
Rigolio, A. (2019) Christians in Conversation: A Guide to Late Antique Dialogues in Greek and Syriac. Oxford.Google Scholar
Roberts, A., Donaldson, J. and Cox, A. C. (eds) (1899) Gregory Thaumaturgus, Dionysius the Great, Julius Africanus, Anatolius and Minor Writers, Methodius, Arnobius. Ante-Nicene Fathers 6. Buffalo, NY.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. (1989) The Jeweled Style: Poetry and Poetics in Late Antiquity. Cornell, NY.Google Scholar
Rolfe, J. (ed.) (1935) Ammiani Marcellini Rerum Gestarum Libri Qui Supersunt. Loeb Classical Library 300, 315, 331. 3 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Romeri, L. (2000) “The logodeipnon: Athenaeus between Banquet and Anti-Banquet,” in Braund, D and Wilkins, J. (eds), Athenaeus and his World: Reading Greek Culture in the Roman Empire. Exeter: 256–71.Google Scholar
Rondeau, M.-J. (1982) Les commentaires patristiques du Psautier (IIIe–Ve siècles), I. Les travaux des Pères Grecs et Latins sur le Psautier. Recherches et bilan. Rome.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, J., Vuong, L. and DesRosiers, N. (eds) (2014) Religious Competition in the Third Century CE: Jews, Christians and the Greco-Roman World. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Ruch, M. (1958) Le préambule dans des œuvres philosophique de Cicéron. Essai sur la genèse et l’art du dialogue. Paris.Google Scholar
Rush, A. (1972) “Death as a Spiritual Marriage: Individual and Ecclesial Eschatology,” Vigiliae Christianae 26.2: 81–101.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (1979) “Rhetors at the Wedding,” Cambridge Classical Journal 25: 104–17.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (1990) “Aristides and the Prose Hymn,” in Russell, D. A. (ed.), Antonine Literature. Oxford: 199–219.Google Scholar
Rusten, J. and König, J. (ed.) (2014) Philostratus. Heroicus. Gymnasticus. Discourses 1 and 2. Loeb Classical Library 521. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Satran, D. (2018) In the Image of Origen: Eros, Virtue and Constraint in the Early Christian Academy. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Scarvelis Constantinou, E. (2013) Guiding to a Blessed End: Andrew of Caesarea and his Apocalypse Commentary in the Ancient Church. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Schaff, P. and Wace, H. (eds) (1994) Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers. Volume II. Socrates, Sozomenus: Church Histories. Peabody, MA.Google Scholar
Scheck, T. (2010) St. Pamphilus. Apology for Origen. With the Letter of Rufinus: On the Falsification of the Books of Origen. Fathers of the Church 120. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Schenker, A. (1975) Hexaplarische Psalmenbruchstücke: Die hexaplarischen Psalmenfragmente der Handschriften Vaticanus graecus 752 und Canonicianus graecus 62. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Schenker, A. (1982) Psalmen in den Hexapla: erste kritische und vollständige Ausgabe der Hexaplarischen Fragmente auf dem Rande der Handschrift Ottobonianus Graecus 398 zu den Ps 24–32. Vatican City.Google Scholar
Scherer, J. (1960) Entretien d’Origène avec Héraclide: Introd., texte, traduction. SC 67. Paris.Google Scholar
Schmidt, C. (ed.) and Macdermot, V. (trans.) (1978) Pistis Sophia. Nag Hammadi Studies 9. Leiden.Google Scholar
Scholfield, A. F. (1959) Aelian. On the Characteristics of Animals. Loeb Classical Library 446, 448, 449. 3 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Scott, S. (ed.) (1995) The Art of Interpreting. Papers in Art History from the Pennsylvania State University 9. University Park, PA.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1997) “Plato’s Auctoritas and the Rebirth of the Commentary Tradition,” in Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. (eds), Philosophia Togata II: Plato and Aristotle at Rome. Oxford: 110–29.Google Scholar
Sheppard, A. (2007) “Porphyry’s Views on Phantasia,” in Karamanolis, G. and Sheppard, A. (eds), Studies on Porphyry. London: 71–6.Google Scholar
Sidebottom, H. (2009) “Philostratus and the Symbolic Roles of the Sophist and the Philosopher,” in Bowie, E and Elsner, J. (eds), Philostratus. Cambridge: 69–99.Google Scholar
Simonetti, M. (1975) “Il millenarismo in Oriente da Origene a Metodio,” in E. Dekkers, (ed.), Corona Gratiarum. Miscellanea Patristica, Historica et Liturgica Eligio Dekers O.S.B., I. Bruges: 37–58.Google Scholar
Slusser, M. (trans.) (1998) St. Gregory Thaumaturgus: Life and Work. Fathers of the Church 98. Washington, DC: 91–126.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (2012) “The Caesars of Julian the Apostate in Translation and Reception, 1580–ca. 1800,” in Baker-Brian, N. and Tougher, S. (eds), Emperor and Author: The Writings of Julian the Apostate. Swansea: 281–321.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (ed.) (2016) Aristotle Reinterpreted: New Findings on SevenHundred Years of the Ancient Commentators. London.Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. (1995) “Reading” Greek Death: To the End of the Classical Period. Oxford.Google Scholar
Strawbridge, J. R. (2016) “A School of Paul? The Use of Pauline Texts in Early Christian Schooltext Papyri,” in Hauge, M. and Pitts, A. (eds), Ancient Education and Early Christianity. London: 165–77.Google Scholar
Strzygowski, J. (1901) Orient oder Rom: Beiträge zur Geschichte der spätantiken und frühchristlichen Kunst. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Suggit, J. (trans.) (2006) Oecumenius. Commentary on the Apocalypse. The Fathers of the Church 112. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1992) “Review of D. A. Russell Antonine Literature,” Journal of Roman Studies 82: 269–70.Google Scholar
Swain, S. and Edwards, M. (eds) (2004) Approaching Late Antiquity: The Transformation from Early to Late Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Tannery, P. (1896) “Sur la religion des derniers mathématiciens de l’antiquité,” Annales de Philosophie Chrétienne 34 [Reprinted in Mémoires scientifiques. Paris, 1912: 527–39].Google Scholar
Teodorsson, S. (2009) “The Place of Plutarch in the Literary Genre of Symposium,” in Ribeiro Ferreira, J., Leão, D., Tröster, M and Barata Dias, P. (eds) Symposion and Philanthropia in Plutarch. Coimbra: 3–16.Google Scholar
Terian, A. (1981) Philonis Alexandrini De animalibus: The Armenian Text with an Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Chico, CA.Google Scholar
Thesleff, H. (1978) “The Interrelation and Date of the Symposia of Plato and Xenophon,” BICS 25: 157–70.Google Scholar
Tibiletti, C. (1983) “L’ambiente culturale cristiano riflesso nel Simposio di Metodio,” Verginità e matrimonio in antichi scrittori cristiani. Rome: 99–133.Google Scholar
Tichener, F. (2011) “Plutarch’s Table Talk: Sampling a Rich Blend. A Survey of Scholarly Appraisal,” in Klotz, F and Oikonomopoulou, K (eds), The Philosopher’s Banquet: Plutarch’s Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire. Oxford: 35–48.Google Scholar
Todd, O. J. (trans.) and Henderson, J. (rev.) (2013) “Symposium,” in Marchant, E. C and Todd, O. J. (trans.), Xenophon. Memorabilia. Oeconomicus. Symposium. Apology. Loeb Classical Library 168. Cambridge, MA: 560–663.Google Scholar
Torrents, J. M. (1986) “Origenismo y gnosis. Los ‘perfectos’ de Metodio de Olimpo,” Augustinianum 26: 89–101.Google Scholar
Torallas Tovar, S. and Worp, K. (2012) “John Chrysostomos and Methodios at Montserrat,” in Schubert, P (ed.), Actes du 26e Congrès international de papyrologie. Genève, 16–21 août 2010. Geneva: 763–72.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. (1990) “Plato’s Phaedrus in Second-Century Greek Literature,” in Russell, D. A. (ed.), Antonine Literature. Oxford: 141–74.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. (2000) “Plato in the Deipnosophistae,” in Braund, D. andWilkins, J (eds), Athenaeus and his World: Reading Greek Culture in the Roman Empire. Exeter: 353–63.Google Scholar
Uglione, R. (2002) “Millennium”: L’Attesa della fine nei primi secoli cristiani: Atti delle III Giornate Patristiche Torinesi, Torino, 23–24 Ottobre 2000. Turin.Google Scholar
Ullrich, F. (1908–9) Entstehung und Entwicklung der Literaturgattung des Symposion I. Teil (bis Xenophon), II. Teil (bis Methodius und Julianus Apostata). Würzburg.Google Scholar
Ureña Bracero, J. (1995) El Diálogo de Luciano: Ejecusión, Naturaleza, y Procedimientos de Humor. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Usher, M. (1998) Homeric Stitchings: The Homeric Centos of the Empress Eudocia. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Vaillant, A. (1930) Le De Autexusio de Methode d’Olympe: Version Slave et Texte Grec édités et traduits en Françcais. Patrologia Orientalis 22/5. Paris: 631–888.Google Scholar
van den Hoek, A. (1997) “The ‘Catechetical’ School of Early Christian Alexandria and its Philonic Heritage,” HThR 90.1: 59–87.Google Scholar
van den Hoek, A. and Herrmann, J. (2001) “Thecla the Beast-Fighter: A Female Emblem of Deliverance in Early Christian Popular Art,” Studia Philonica Annual: Studies in Hellenistic Judaism 13: 212–49.Google Scholar
van den Paverd, F. (1978a) “Paenitentia secunda in Methodius of Olympus,” Aug 18.3: 459–85.Google Scholar
van den Paverd, F. (1978b) “Confession (Exagoreusis) and Penance (Exomologesis) in the De Lepra of Methodius of Olympus I,” Orientalia Christiana Perodica 44: 309–41.Google Scholar
van den Paverd, F. (1979) “Confession (Exagoreusis) and Penance (Exomologesis) in the De Lepra of Methodius of Olympus II,” Orientalia Christiana Perodica 45: 45–74.Google Scholar
van Hoof, L. (2010) “Greek Rhetoric and the Later Roman Empire: The Bubble of the Third Sophistic,” Antiquité tardive 18: 211–24.Google Scholar
Vela Tejada, J. (2009) “El Banquete de los Siete Sabios de Plutarco y los Temas de Sabiduria Practica,” in Ribeiro Ferreira, J., Leão, D., Tröster, M and Barata Dias, P. (eds) Symposion and Philanthropia in Plutarch. Coimbra: 459–70.Google Scholar
Vitores, A. (1981) Identidad entre el cuerpo muerto y resucitado en Origenes. Segun el De resurrectione de Metodio de Olimpo. Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Vizmanos, P. (1949) Las Virgenes Cristianas de la Iglesia Primitiva. Madrid: 989–1088.Google Scholar
Volgers, A. and Zamagni, C. (eds) (2004) Erotapokriseis: Early Christian Question-and-Answer Literature in Context: Proceedings of the Utrecht Colloquium, 13–14 October 2003. Leuven.Google Scholar
von Staden, H. (1997) “Galen and the Second Sophistic,” in R. Sorabji, (ed.), Aristotle and After. London: 33–54.Google Scholar
Walker, J. (2006) The Legend of Mar Qardagh: Narrative and Christian Heroism in Late Antique Iraq. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Watts, E. (2004) “Student Travel to Intellectual Centers: What was the Attraction?,” in Ellis, L. and Kidner, F (eds), Travel, Communication and Geography in Late Antiquity. Farnham: 13–23.Google Scholar
Webb, R. (2007) “Rhetoric and the Novel: Sex, Lies and Sophistic,” in I. Worthington, (ed.), A Companion to Greek Rhetoric. Oxford: 526–41.Google Scholar
Webb, R. (2009) Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice. Farnham.Google Scholar
Weinbrot, H. (2005) Menippean Satire Reconsidered: From Antiquity to the Eighteenth Century. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Wheeler, A. (1930) “Tradition in the Epithalamium,” American Journal of Philology 51.3: 205–23.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2001) Greek Literature and the Roman Empire: The Politics of Imitation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2007) “Prose Literature and the Severan Dynasty,” in Swain, S., Harrison, S. and Elsner, J. (eds), Severan Culture. Cambridge: 29–51.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2013) Beyond the Second Sophistic: Adventures in Greek Postclassicism. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2017) “Greece: Hellenistic and Early Imperial Continuities,” in Richter, D. S. and Johnson, W. A. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Second Sophistic. Oxford: 11–24.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J. (2000) “Dialogue and Comedy: The Structure of the Deipnosophistae,” in Braund, D. andWilkins, J (eds), Athenaeus and his World: Reading Greek Culture in the Roman Empire. Exeter: 23–37.Google Scholar
Williams, C. (2012) “Perpetua’s Gender. A Latinist Reads the Passio Perpetuae et Felicitatis,” in Bremmer, J. and Formisano, M. (eds), Perpetua’s Passions: Multidisciplinary Approaches to the Passio Perpetuae and Felicitatis. Oxford: 54–77.Google Scholar
Williams, F. (trans.) (2013) The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis. Books II and III. De Fide. 2nd revised ed. Nag Hammadi and Manichean Studies 79. Leiden.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. (2007) The Death of Socrates: Hero, Villain, Chatterbox, Saint. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. and Williams, G. (1982) Later Greek Literature. Yale Classical Studies 27. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wohl, V. (2004) “Dirty Dancing: Xenophon’s Symposium,” in Murray, P. and Wilson, P. (eds), Music and the Muses. The Culture of Mousike in the Classical Athenian City. Oxford: 337–63.Google Scholar
Wright, W.C. (1913) The Works of the Emperor Julian. Volume II. Loeb Classical Library 29. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Wright, W.C. (1921) Philostratus. Lives of the Sophists. Eunapius. Lives of the Philosophers. Loeb Classical Library 134. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Young, F. (2004a) “Concluding Review: The Literary Culture of the Third Century,” in Young, F., Ayres, L. and Louth, A. (eds), The Cambridge History of Early Christian Literature. Cambridge : 172–8.Google Scholar
Young, F. (2004b) “The Significance of Third-Century Christian Literature,” in Young, F., Ayres, L. and Louth, A. (eds), The Cambridge History of Early Christian Literature. Cambridge : 239–45.Google Scholar
Zahn, T. (1886) “Studien zu Justinus Martyr: I. Justinus bei Methodius und Paulus bei Justinus. Uber den Bischofssitz des M,” Zeitschrift fur Kirchengeschichte 8: 1–20.Google Scholar
Zamagni, C. (2004) “Une introduction méthodologique à la littérature patristique des questions et réponses: Le cas d’Eusèbe de Césarée,” in Volgers, A. and Zamagni, C. (eds), Erotapokriseis: Early Christian Question-and-Answer Literature in Context: Proceedings of the Utrecht Colloquium, 13–14 October 2003. Leuven: 7–24.Google Scholar
Zamagni, C. (2013) “New Perspectives on Eusebius’ Questions and Answers on the Gospels: The Manuscripts,” in Johnson, A. and Schott, J. (eds), Eusebius of Caesarea: Tradition and Innovations. Hellenic Studies Series 60. Washington, DC: 239–61.Google Scholar
Zenos, A. C. (1994) “Socrates: Church History from A.D. 305–439,” in P. Schaff and H. Wace (eds), Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers. Volume II. Socrates, Sozomenus: Church Histories. Peabody, MA: 1–179.Google Scholar
Zoeli, A. S. (1952) Methodio, Il Banchetto delle dieci virgini. Testi Christiani N.S. 2. Florence.Google Scholar
Zorzi, M. B. (2003a) “La reinterpretazione dell’eros platonico nel ‘Simposio’ di Metodio d’Olimpo,” Adamantius 9: 102–27.Google Scholar
Zorzi, M. B. (2003b) “La personalita delle vergine e l’epilogo del Simposio di Metodio d’Olimpo: una critica all’encratismo,” in Reportata. Passato e presente della teologia. Online at http://mondodomani.org/reportata/zorzi03.htmGoogle Scholar
Zorzi, M. B. (2003c) “Castita e generazione nel bello. L’eros nel Simposio di Metodio d’Olympo,” Reportata. Passato e presente della teologia. Online at http://mondodomani.org/reportata/zorzi02.htmGoogle Scholar
Zorzi, M. B. (2006) “Metodio d’Olimpio, un autore minore?,” Révue d’Études Augustiniennes et Patristiques 52.1: 31–56.Google Scholar
Zorzi, M. B. (2009) “The Use of the Terms ἁγνεία, παρθενία, σωφροσύνη, and ἐγκράτεια in the Symposium of Methodius of Olympus,” Vigiliae Christianae 63.2: 138–68.Google Scholar
Zorzi, B. and Mejzer, M. (ed. and trans.) (2010) Metodio d’Olimpo, La Risurrezione. Rome.Google Scholar