Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2018
Markets, today represent not just arenas of exchange but a way of life that organises activities based on values assigned (explicitly or implicitly) by the market (Sandel, 2012). In the veneer of economic objectivity and value neutrality, market-based values continue to displace other values that emphasise different sensitivities and alternate normative forms of organising society. The ecological destruction resulting from the deepening of ‘market societies’ is tangible and increasingly indisputable. And so are the inequalities that appear to be the natural (and perhaps celebrated) outcomes in such societies. While the glaring and pernicious effects have been alarmingly met with indifference and an inertial bias for the status quo, it has also been met with organisations that seek to challenge what is increasingly apparent as a dangerous way of life.
In this chapter, we study organisations seeking to promote social change that forces them to engage with markets, even while they resist the dominant principles characterising the markets in which they work are based. Despite subscribing to visions of development that are clearly inconsistent with those promoted by dominant discourses of market-based development, these organisations have no option but to engage with markets. In doing so, they often have to reject mainstream measures of success and constantly strive to challenge the market structures even as they continue to operate in them and perhaps even depend on them to achieve their goals. Conventional frames of understanding organisations may lead us to unfavourable views of such organisations, in comparison with others who might be operating in the same spaces, with greater alignment with dominant market logics. However, we argue this would be severely underestimating the work such organisations do. Instead, they reflect more on the measures used and the horizons privileged by these measures than the societal and ecological value created by such organisations.
While we do not think that such contestations are limited to only these, the organisations we focus on this chapter are Dastkar Andhra (DA) and its sister organisations: Selco Solar Limited (Formerly, the Solar Electric Light Company, India), Decentralised Cotton Yarn Trust (DCYT) and Pratham Books. The Oxford Dictionary defines contestation as ‘the action or process of disputing or arguing’.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.