Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Preface
- PART I
- 1 Beginnings: Oxford and Cambridge Poetry in the Early 1950s
- 2 Violent Times: Anti-Movement Poetry in the Mid to Late 1950s
- 3 In Opposite Directions: A. Alvarez and Thom Gunn
- 4 Against Gentility
- 5 On Being Serious
- 6 Anthology-Making
- 7 First Reactions: The Review Debate and the Initial Response to The New Poetry
- PART II
- PART III
- PART IV
- Bibliography
- Index
3 - In Opposite Directions: A. Alvarez and Thom Gunn
from PART I
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Preface
- PART I
- 1 Beginnings: Oxford and Cambridge Poetry in the Early 1950s
- 2 Violent Times: Anti-Movement Poetry in the Mid to Late 1950s
- 3 In Opposite Directions: A. Alvarez and Thom Gunn
- 4 Against Gentility
- 5 On Being Serious
- 6 Anthology-Making
- 7 First Reactions: The Review Debate and the Initial Response to The New Poetry
- PART II
- PART III
- PART IV
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Though A. Alvarez's appointment as poetry editor of the Observer in 1956 would quickly make him best known as a literary journalist, through much of the 1950s he was primarily an academic. Alvarez studied and taught at Oxford and at Princeton, where he was a protégé of R.P. Blackmur, and his university posts resulted in two critical books aimed largely at an academic audience: 1958's The Shaping Spirit, which is about the poetry of English and American modernism, and 1960's The School of Donne, which is on the metaphysical poets.
The Shaping Spirit is somewhere between being a work of Movement criticism (John Wain is a notable influence) and a reaction against it. On the one hand, Alvarez offers up the opinion that ‘The experimental trappings of modernism are a minor issue in English verse. It is largely an American importation and an American need.’ On the other, as he writes of Eliot, Yeats, Pound, Lawrence, Auden, Empson, Crane and Stevens, there is no doubting the pull of American modernism for the young Alvarez, nor his interest in seeing, in Yeats and Lawrence in particular, versions of a modern poetic intelligence beyond the American.
The chapter on D.H. Lawrence is the most telling. Here innovation and emotion become one: ‘The whole of Lawrence's power and originality as a poet depends on the way he keeps close to his feelings. That is why he had to rid himself of conventional forms.’ Here too Alvarez falls out of temper with the poetry of the 1950s. Criticism of Lawrence's ‘carelessness’ as a poet rouses the response:
Our modern poetry began with a vigorous attack on outworn conventions of feeling and expression. But the emphasis has gradually gone so much on the craft and technicality of writing that the original wholeness and freshness is again lost. … The real material of poetry … depends on getting close to the real feelings and presenting them without formulae and without avoidance, in all their newness, disturbance and ugliness. If a poet does that he will not find himself writing in Lawrence's style; but like Lawrence, he may speak out in his own voice, single and undisguised.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Alvarez GenerationThom Gunn, Geoffrey Hill, Ted Hughes, Sylvia Plath, and Peter Porter, pp. 29 - 44Publisher: Liverpool University PressPrint publication year: 2015