Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T23:54:42.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Late Miocene to Pleistocene apes

from Part III - Review of fossil apes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2016

Peter Andrews
Affiliation:
Natural History Museum, London
Get access

Summary

Up to this point, we have had the advantage of dealing with relatively well-preserved fossil apes. In the early Miocene we had the partial skeletons of proconsulids, and in the middle Miocene we had either partial skeletons of afropithecines in Africa or very large samples of teeth and jaws with fascinating environmental contexts in Turkey. The later middle Miocene and late Miocene fossil dryopithecines in Europe are equally well preserved, with several skulls and partial skeletons. Late Miocene apes in Africa, by contrast, are poorly represented in the fossil record, but because they are the only fossil apes known in Africa during the late Miocene, they are of some importance. Most apes disappeared from the fossil record by about 8 million years ago, including those previously living in Europe and Asia, although we can mention the giant fossil ape Gigantopithecus blacki, which survived well into the Pleistocene in China and Vietnam. The teeth of this fossil ape has some parallels with human teeth, for example the small incisors and canines, and bicuspid premolars completely lacking any premolar honing, but there is little doubt that these similarities were due to convergence and do not indicate significant evolutionary relationship with humans.

Late Miocene apes in Africa

The three fossil apes in Africa during the period 9 to 10 million years ago are too incomplete to be able to assign them either with each other or to any living or fossil ape. They share few similarities with the great ape and human clade, and in the absence of cranial, dental and postcranial characters such as are present for the dryopithecines, and which link them with the great apes, it is impossible at this stage to assign them to this or any other clade.

In 2007, a fossil ape named Chororapithecus abyssinicus was named from 10 million-year-old deposits at Beticha in the Chorora Formation in Ethiopia. There are only nine isolated teeth, but they showed that it had gorilla-sized dentition and combined a degree of shearing crest formation on the molars with thickened enamel and relatively flat dentine surfaces, an unusual combination not seen in any living or fossil ape. In combination with the thickened enamel, this suggests a functional adaptation to hard and/or abrasive food items.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alpagut, B., Andrews, P., Fortelius, M. et al. 1996. A new specimen of Ankarapithecus meteai from the Sinap Formation of central Anatolia. Nature 382, 349–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, P.J. & Tekkaya, I. 1980. A revision of the Turkish Miocene hominoid Sivapithecus meteai. Paleontology 23, 85–95.Google Scholar
Bacon, A.-M. & Long, V.T. 2001. The first discovery of a complete skeleton of a fossil orang-utan in a cave of the Hoa Binh Province, Vietnam. Journal of Human Evolution 41, 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badgley, C. 1984. The palaeoenvironment of South Asian Miocene hominoids. In White, R.D., Editor, The Evolution of East Asian Environments, 796–811. Hong Kong, Centre for Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Badgley, C. 1989. Community analysis of Siwalik mammals from Pakistan. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 9, 11A.Google Scholar
Begun, D.R. & Güleç, E. 1998. Restoration of the type and palate of Ankarapithecus meteai: taxonomic and phylogenetic implications. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 105, 279–314.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Begun, D.R. & Kivell, T.L. 2011. Knuckle-walking in Sivapithecus? The combined effects of homology and homoplasy with possible implications for pongine dispersals. Journal of Human Evolution 60, 158–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonis, L., Bouvrain, G., Geraads, D. & Koufos, G. 1992. Diversity and palaeoecology of Greek late Miocene mammalian faunas. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 91, 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonis, L. & Koufos, G.D. 2014. First discovery of postcranial bones of Ouranopithecus macedoniensis (Primates, Hominoidea) from the late Miocene of Macedonia (Greece). Journal of Human Evolution 74, 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonis, L. & Melentis, J. 1977. Un nouveau genre de primate hominoide dans leVallesien (Miocène supérieur) de Macédoine. Comptes Rendues de l'Academie des Sciences de Paris 284, 1393–1396.Google Scholar
Bonis, L. & Melentis, J. 1978. Les primates hominoides du Miocène supérieur de Macédoine. Annales de Paléontologie 64, 185–202.Google Scholar
Brown, B. & Ward, S.C. 1988. Basicranial and facial topography in Pongo and Sivapithecus. In Schwartz, J., Editor, Orang utan Biology, 247–260. New York, Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Chaimanee, Y., Jolly, D., Benanmml, M. et al. 2003. A middle Miocene hominoid from Thailand and orangutan origins. Nature 422, 61–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaimanee, Y., Suteethorn, V., Jintsakul, P. et al. 2004. A new orang-utan relative from the late Miocene of Thailand. Nature 427, 439–441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cerling, T.E., Quade, J., Wang, Y. & Bowman, J.R. 1989. Carbon isotopes in soils and palaeosols as ecology and palaeoecology indicators. Nature 341, 138–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costeur, L. 2005. Cenogram analysis of the Rudabánya mammalian community: palaeoenvironmental interpretations. Palaeontologia Italia 90, 303–309.Google Scholar
DeSilva, J.M., Morgan, M.E., Barry, J.C. & Pilbeam, D. 2010. A hominoid distal tibia from the Miocene of Pakistan. Journal of Human Evolution 58, 147–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, T. 2002. Late Oligocene to middle Miocene catarrhines from Afro-Arabia. In Hartwig, W.C., Editor, The Primate Fossil Record, 311–338. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hartwig, W.C. (Editor) 2002. The Primate Fossil Record. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, Y.Kh., Tshen, L.T., Westaway, K.E. et al. 2013. First discovery of Pleistocene orangutan (Pongo sp.) fossils in Peninsular Malaysia: biogeographic and paleoenvironmental implications. Journal of Human Evolution 65, 770–797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishida, H., Kunimatsu, Y., Takano, T., Nakano, Y. & Nakatsukasa, M. 2004. Nacholapithecus skeleton from the middle Miocene of Kenya. Journal of Human Evolution 46, 69–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, B.F. 1992. Taphonomy of a middle Miocene authochthonous forest assemblage, Ngorora Formation, central Kenya. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 99, 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, J.-J., Soe, A.N., Chavasseau, O. et al. 2011. First hominoid from the late Miocene of the Irrawaddy Formation (Myanmar). PLOS One 6 (4), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kappelman, J., Richmond, B.G., Seiffert, E.R., Maga, A.M. & Ryan, T.M. 2003. Hominoidea (Primates). In Fortelius, M. & Kappelman, J., Editors, Geology and Paleontology of the Miocene Sinap Formation, Turkey, 90–124. New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Koenigswald, G.H.R. 1972. Ein Unterkiefer eines fossilen Hominoiden aus dem Unterpliozän Griechenlands. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam 75, 385–394.Google Scholar
Kunimatsu, Y., Nakatsukasa, M., Sawada, Y. et al. 2007. A new late Miocene great ape from Kenya and its implications for the origins of African great apes and humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 19220–19225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maden, S.L., Rose, M.D., Kelley, J., MacLatchy, L. & Pilbeam, D. 2002. New Sivapithecus postcranial specimens from the Siwaliks of Pakistan. Journal of Human Evolution 42, 705–752.Google Scholar
McBrearty, S. & Jablonsky, N.G. 2005. First fossil chimpanzee. Nature 437, 105–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, S.V. 2013. Chimpanzee fauna isotopes provide new interpretations of fossil ape and hominin ecologies. Proceedings of the Royal Society 280, 2013–2324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nevell, L. & Wood, B. 2008. Cranial base evolution within the hominin clade. Journal of Anatomy 212, 455–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickford, M., Coppens, Y., Senut, B., Morales, J. & Braga, J. 2009. Late Miocene hominoid from Niger. Comptes Rendus Paleoevolution 8, 413–425.Google Scholar
Pickford, M. & Senut, B. 2001. The geological and faunal context of late Miocene hominid remains from Lukeino, Kenya. Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences de Paris 332, 145–152.Google Scholar
Pickford, M. & Senut, B. 2005. Hominoid teeth with chimpanzee- and gorilla-like features from the Miocene of Kenya: implications for the chronology of ape-human divergence and biogeography of Miocene hominoids. Anthropological Science 113, 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilbeam, D.R. 1982. New hominoid skull material from the Miocene of Pakistan. Nature 295, 232–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preuss, T.M. 1982. The face of Sivapithecus indicus: description of a new, relatively complete specimen from the Siwaliks of Pakistan. Folia Primatologica 38, 141–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rein, T.R., Harrison, T. & Zollikofer, P.E. 2012. Skeletal correlates of quadrupedalism and climbing in the anthropoid forelimb: implications for inferring locomotion in Miocene catarrhines. Journal of Human Evolution 61, 564–574.Google Scholar
Rose, M.D. 1984 Hominoid postcranial specimens from the middle Miocene Chinji Formation, Pakistan, Journal of Human Evolution 13, 503–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, M.D. 1986. Further hominoid postcranial specimens from the late Miocene Nagri Formation of Pakistan. Journal of Human Evolution 15, 333–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, M.D. 1988 Another look at the anthropoid elbow. Journal of Human Evolution 17, 193–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, M.D. 1989. New postcranial specimens of catarrhines from the middle Miocene Chinji Formation, Pakistan: descriptions and a discussion of proximal humeral functional morphology in anthropoids. Journal of Human Evolution 18, 131–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, M.D. 1994. Quadrupedalism in some Miocene catarrhines. Journal of Human Evolution 26, 387–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, J. 1990 Lufengpithecus and its potential relationship to an orang-utan clade. Journal of Human Evolution 519, 591–605.Google Scholar
Shea, B.T. 1985. On aspects of skull form in African apes and orangutans, with implications for hominoid evolution. AmericanJournal of Physical Anthropology 68, 329–342.Google Scholar
Smith, T.M., Martin, L.B., Reid, D.J., de Bonis, L. & Koufos, G.D. 2004. An examination of dental development in Graecopithecus freybergi (= Ouranopithecus macedoniensis). Journal of Human Evolution 46, 551–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spoor, C.F., Sondaar, P.Y. & Hussain, S.T. 1991. A new hominoid hamate and first metacarpal from the late Miocene Nagri Formation of Pakistan. Journal of Human Evolution 21, 413–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suc, J.-P. 1999. Neogene vegetation change in West European and West circum-Mediterranean areas. In Agusti, J., Rook, L. & Andrews, P., Editors, The Evolution of Neogene Terrestrial Ecosystems in Europe, 378–388. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suwa, G., Kono, R.T., Katoh, S., Asfaw, B. & Beyene, Y. 2007. A new species of great ape from the late Miocene epoch in Ethiopia. Nature 448, 921–924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
XuePing, J.I., Jablonski, N.G., Su, D.F. et al. 2013. Juvenile hominoid cranium from the terminal Miocene of Yunnan, China. Chinese Science Bulletin 55, 2–9.Google Scholar
Zhang, X. 1987. New materials of Ramapithecus from Kaiyuan, Yunnan. Acta Anthropologica Sinica 6, 81–86.Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Lin, Y., Jiang, C. & Xaio, L. 1987. A new species of Ramapithecus from Yuanmou, Yunnan. Journal of Yunnan University 3, 54–56.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×