Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Table of Cases
- Table of Treaties and other International Instruments
- Table of Abbreviations
- PART A INTRODUCTION
- PART B PROSECUTIONS IN NATIONAL COURTS
- PART C INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTIONS
- PART D SUBSTANTIVE LAW OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMES
- PART E PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES OF INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTIONS
- 15 General Principles of Liability
- 16 Defences/Grounds for Excluding Criminal Responsibility
- 17 Procedures of International Criminal Investigations and Prosecutions
- 18 Victims in the International Criminal Process
- 19 Sentencing and Penalties
- PART F RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS
- Index
- References
16 - Defences/Grounds for Excluding Criminal Responsibility
from PART E - PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES OF INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTIONS
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Table of Cases
- Table of Treaties and other International Instruments
- Table of Abbreviations
- PART A INTRODUCTION
- PART B PROSECUTIONS IN NATIONAL COURTS
- PART C INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTIONS
- PART D SUBSTANTIVE LAW OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMES
- PART E PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES OF INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTIONS
- 15 General Principles of Liability
- 16 Defences/Grounds for Excluding Criminal Responsibility
- 17 Procedures of International Criminal Investigations and Prosecutions
- 18 Victims in the International Criminal Process
- 19 Sentencing and Penalties
- PART F RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
Defences (or in the terminology of the ICC Statute ‘grounds for excluding criminal responsibility’) are an oft-forgotten aspect of international criminal law. Jurisprudence from the international criminal Tribunals on the matter is sparse, and not always satisfactory. There are a number of reasons for this, one of which also at least partially explains the relative lack of scholarly attention given to most defences in international criminal law. This is the tendency towards a lack of sympathy for defendants in international criminal proceedings. As Albin Eser has said, there are ‘certain psychological reservations toward defences. By providing perpetrators of brutal crimes against humanity … with defences for their offences, we have effectively lent them a hand in finding grounds for excluding punishability.’ Other reasons include the fact that in international Tribunals, the Prosecutor's choice of defendants rarely includes those who have plausible claims of defences recognized by the law. Defences are, however, a fundamental part of criminal law, and reflect important limitations on the proper scope of punishable conduct. It is the purpose of this chapter to set out and critique the law relating to defences, in both treaty-based and customary international law. This chapter is primarily concerned with substantive defences to international crimes, it does not deal with issues such as immunity, youth, ne bis in idem or limitation periods.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure , pp. 402 - 424Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
, International Criminal Law, 2nd edn (Oxford, 2008) chs. 12–13.
, ‘The Mental Element in International Criminal Law: The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and the Elements of Offences’ (2002) 12 Criminal Law Forum291.Google Scholar
, Prosecuting International Crimes: Selectivity and the International Criminal Law Regime (Cambridge, 2005) ch. 6.Google Scholar
, ‘Defences’ in and (eds.), Substantive and Procedural Aspects of International Criminal Law (The Hague, 2000), vol. I, 367.Google Scholar
, ‘Article 31’ in , Observers' Notes863.
, ‘Conundrums of Armed Conflict: Criminal Defences to Violations of the Humanitarian Law of War’ (1996) 15 Dickinson Journal of International Law1.Google Scholar
, Obeying Orders: Atrocities, Military Discipline and the Law of War (New Brunswick, 1999).Google Scholar
, ‘Defences Before the International Criminal Court’ Parts 1 and 2 (2001) 1 International Criminal Law Review 111 and (2002) 2 International Criminal Law Review1.Google Scholar
, ‘Article 33’ in , Observers' Notes, 915.
, ‘Defences in War Crimes Trials’ in and (eds.), War Crimes in International Law (The Hague, 1996) 251.Google Scholar
, ‘The Perplexing Borders of Justification and Excuse’ (1984) 84 Columbia Law Review1897
, ‘Duress, International Criminal Law and Literature’ (2006) 4 Journal of International Criminal Justice724.Google Scholar
, ‘The Emerging Mental Incapacity Defense in International Criminal Law: Some Initial Questions of Implementation’ (2000) 96 American Journal of International Law317.Google Scholar
, The Criminal Responsibility of Individuals for Violations of International Humanitarian Law (The Hague, 2003) 249.Google Scholar
, ‘The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Some Preliminary Reflections’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law144, 154–5.Google Scholar
, ‘War Crimes Committed in Non-International Armed Conflicts and the Emerging System of International Criminal Justice’ (2000) 30 Israel Yearbook on Human Rights103, 152ff.Google Scholar
, The Defence of ‘Obedience to Superior Orders’ in International Criminal Law (The Hague, 1965) 147–56.Google Scholar
, ‘Duress as a Defence to War Crimes After Erdemović: A Laboratory for a Permanent Court?’ (1998) 1 Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law210Google Scholar
, ‘The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: The Erdemović Case’ (1998) 47 International and Comparative Law Quarterly461Google Scholar
, ‘Zur Methode der Rechtsfindung im Allgemeinen Teil des Völkerstrafrechts. Die Bewertung von Tötungen im Nötigungsnotstand durch die Rechtsmittelkammer des Internationalen Straftribunals für das ehemalige Jugoslawien im Fall Erdemović’ (1999) 111 Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft597Google Scholar
, ‘One Appeal, Four Opinions, Two Philosophies and a Remittal’ (1998) 2 Journal of Armed Conflict Law193Google Scholar
, ‘Liberal Values In International Criminal Law: A Critique of Erdemović’ (2008) 6 Journal of International Criminal Justice3Google Scholar
and , ‘Prosecutor v. Kamara et al. and Fofana and Kondewa’ (2007) 101 American Journal of International Law848, 856–7.Google Scholar
, ‘The Harmonization of General Principles of Criminal Law: The Statutes and Juruisprudence of the ICTY, ICTR and the ICC: An Overview’ (2004) 19 Nouvelles Etudes Pénales319, 333Google Scholar
, ‘Intent, Mistake of Law and Co-Perpetration in the Lubanga Decision on Confirmation of Charges’ (2008) 6 Journal of International Criminal Justice471, 474–6.Google Scholar
, ‘Reflections on the Relationship Between the Duty to Educate in Humanitarian Law and the Absence of a Defence of Mistakes of Law in the Rome Statute’ in , and (eds.), International Conflict and Security Law (Cambridge, 2005) 32, 38–43.Google Scholar
, ‘Living Up to Rules: Holding Soldiers Responsible for Abusive Conduct and the Dilemma of the Superior Orders Defence’ (2007) 52 McGill Law Journal1.Google Scholar
, ‘The Defence of Superior Orders: The Statute of the International Criminal Court Versus Customary International Law’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law172Google Scholar
, ‘Superior Orders and the International Criminal Court: Justice Delivered or Justice Denied?’ (1999) 836 International Review of the Red Cross785Google Scholar
, ‘Clear and Obvious? A Critical Examination of the Superior Orders Defense in Israeli Case Law’ (2005–2006) 2 Israel Defence Force Law Review197Google Scholar
, Mass Atrocity, Ordinary Evil and Hannah Arendt: Criminal Consciousness in Argentina's Dirty War (New Haven, 2001)Google Scholar
and , ‘Genuine Consent to Sexual Violence Under International Criminal Law’ (2007) 101American Journal of International Law121, 128–31
, ‘The ICTR's Legacy on Sexual Violence’ (2008) 14 New England Journal of International and Comparative Law101Google Scholar
, ‘Belligerent Reprisals in the Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’ in , and (eds.), International and National Prosecution of Crimes Under International Law (Berlin, 2001) 359Google Scholar