Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 11
    • Show more authors
    • You may already have access via personal or institutional login
    • Select format
    • Publisher:
      Cambridge University Press
      Publication date:
      03 December 2009
      08 December 2003
      ISBN:
      9780511616570
      9780521828321
      9780521535410
      Dimensions:
      (216 x 138 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.387kg, 228 Pages
      Dimensions:
      (216 x 138 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.27kg, 230 Pages
    You may already have access via personal or institutional login
  • Selected: Digital
    Add to cart View cart Buy from Cambridge.org

    Book description

    John Stuart Mill was the leading British philosopher of the nineteenth century and his famous essay Utilitarianism is the most influential statement of the philosophy of utilitarianism: that actions, laws, policies and institutions are to be evaluated by their utility or contribution to good or bad consequences. Henry West has written the most up-to-date and user-friendly introduction to utilitarianism available. The book serves as both a commentary to and interpretation of the text. It also defends Mill against his critics. An appendix reviews in detail the structure and arguments of Utilitarianism. This book is primarily intended as a textbook for students in philosophy assigned to read Utilitarianism but it should also prove helpful to students and professionals in other fields such as political science, history and economics.

    Reviews

    ‘… offers a sophisticated exposition, interpretation and defense of Mill’s moral theory that will be understandable to any literate reader. It is readable and fair, judicious and original.’

    David Lyons - Boston University

    ‘The book will be particularly valuable to students interested in Mill’s ethical theory. But it should be of interest to Mill scholars and to the general reader who wishes to understand the foundations of ethics.’

    C. L. Ten - University of Singapore

    Refine List

    Actions for selected content:

    Select all | Deselect all
    • View selected items
    • Export citations
    • Download PDF (zip)
    • Save to Kindle
    • Save to Dropbox
    • Save to Google Drive

    Save Search

    You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

    Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
    ×

    Contents

    Bibliography
    Aiken, Henry David. “Definitions, Factual Premises, and Ethical Conclusions.” Philosophical Review 61 (1952): 331–48
    Albee, Ernest. A History of English Utilitarianism. London: Sonnenschein; New York: Macmillan, 1902
    Alican, Necip Fikri. Mill's Principle of Utility: A Defence of John Stuart Mill's Notorious Proof. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 1994
    Anderson, Susan Leigh. On Mill. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2000
    Anschutz, R. P. The Philosophy of J. S. Mill. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1953
    Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. W. D. Ross, trans. Vol. 9 of The Works of Aristotle. London: Oxford University Press, 1925
    Ashmore, Robert B. Jr.Deriving the Desirable from the Desired.” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 44 (1970): 152–60
    Atkinson, R. F.J. S. Mill's ‘Proof’ of the Principle of Utility.” Philosophy 32 (1957): 158–67
    Baier, Annette. “Hume, David.” Encyclopedia of Ethics. 2nd ed. 3 vols. Lawrence C. Becker and Charlotte B. Becker, eds. New York and London: Routledge, 2001
    Bain, Alexander. John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections. 1882. Reprint, New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1969
    Baker, John. “Mill's Captivating ‘Proof’ and the Foundations of Ethics.” Social Theory and Practice 6 (1980): 299–310
    Baker, John M.Utilitarianism and Secondary Principles.” Philosophical Quarterly 21 (1971): 69–71
    Baumgardt, David. Bentham and the Ethics of Today with Manuscripts Hitherto Unpublished. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1952. Reprint, New York: Octagon Books, 1966
    Bayles, Michael D.Mill's ‘Utilitarianism’ and Aristotle's ‘Rhetoric.’Modern Schoolman 51 (1974): 159–70
    Bentham, Jeremy. Constitutional Code. Vol. 9 of Works of Jeremy Bentham. John Bowring, ed. Edinburgh, 1841
    Bentham, Jeremy. Book of Fallacies. Vol. 2 of Works of Jeremy Bentham. John Bowring, ed. Edinburgh, 1843
    Bentham, Jeremy. Works of Jeremy Bentham. 11 vols. John Bowring, ed. Edinburgh, 1838–43
    Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. 1789. J. H. Burns and H. L. A. Hart, eds. London: University of London, Athlone Press, 1970
    Berger, Fred R. “Mill's Concept of Happiness.” Interpretation 7 (1978): 95–117
    Berger, Fred R. “John Stuart Mill on Justice and Fairness.” In New Essays on John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism, Wesley E. Cooper, Kai Nielsen, and Steven C. Patten, eds. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, supp. vol. 5 (1979): 115–36
    Berger, Fred R.Mill's Substantive Principles of Justice: A Comparison with Nozick.” American Philosophical Quarterly 19 (1982): 373–80
    Berger, Fred R.. Happiness, Justice, and Freedom: The Moral and Political Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1984
    Billings, John R.J. S. Mill's Quantity-Quality Distinction.” The Mill News Letter 7 (1971): 6–16
    Bradley, F. H. Ethical Studies. 1876. 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press, 1927
    Brandt, Richard B. Ethical Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1959
    Brandt, Richard B.. A Theory of the Good and the Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979
    Brandt, Richard B.. Facts, Values, and Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996
    Brink, David O. “Mill's Deliberative Utilitarianism.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 21 (1992): 67–103. Reprinted in Mill's Utilitarianism: Critical Essays, David Lyons, ed. 149–83. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 1997
    Britton, Karl. John Stuart Mill. 2nd ed. New York: Dover, 1969
    Bronaugh, Richard. “The Quality in Pleasures.” Philosophy 49 (1974): 320–2
    Bronaugh, Richard. “The Utility of Quality: An Understanding of Mill.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (1974): 317–25
    Brown, D. G.What Is Mill's Principle of Utility?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1973): 1–12
    Brown, D. G.. “Mill's Act-Utilitarianism.” Philosophical Quarterly 24 (1974): 67–8
    Brown, D. G.. “Mill's Criterion of Wrong Conduct.” Dialogue 21 (1982): 27–44
    Carmichael, Peter A.Mill and ‘Desirable.’Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 34 (1974): 435–6
    Carritt, E. F. Ethical and Political Thinking. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1947
    Chamblin, T. S., and Walker, A. D. M.. “Tendencies, Frequencies and Classical Utilitarianism.” Analysis 35 (1974): 8–12
    Clark, George A.Mill's ‘Notorious Analogy.’Journal of Philosophy 56 (1959): 652–6
    Cohen, Elliot David. “J. S. Mill's Qualitative Hedonism: A Textual Analysis.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 18 (1980): 151–8
    Cohen, Stephen. “Proof and Sanction in Mill's Utilitarianism.” History of Philosophy Quarterly (1990): 475–87
    Collingwood, R. G. An Essay on Philosophical Method. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1933
    Coope, Christopher Miles. “Was Mill a Utilitarian?” Utilitas 10 (1998): 33–67
    Cooper, Neil. “Mill's ‘Proof’ of the Principle of Utility.” Mind 78 (1969): 278–9
    Cooper, Wesley E., Kai Nielsen, and Steven C. Patten, eds. New Essays on John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. supp. vol. 5. Guelph: Canadian Association for Publishing in Philosophy, 1979
    Copp, David. “The Iterated-Utilitarianism of J. S. Mill.” In New Essays on John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism, Wesley E. Cooper, Kai Nielsen, and Steven C. Patten, eds. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, supp. vol. 5 (1979): 75–98
    Cowan, J. L. Pleasure and Pain. London: Macmillan; New York: St. Martin's, 1968
    Crisp, Roger. “Mill on Virtue as a Part of Happiness.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 4 (1996): 367–80
    Crisp, Roger. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Mill on Utilitarianism. London and New York: Routledge, 1997
    Cupples, Brian. “A Defence of the Received Interpretation of J. S. Mill.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50 (1972): 131–7
    Dahl, Norman O.Is Mill's Hedonism Inconsistent?” American Philosophical Quarterly, Monograph 7 (1973): 37–54
    Dancy, Jonathan. “Mill's Puzzling Footnote.” Utilitas 12 (2000): 219–22
    Uyl, Douglas, and Machan, Tibor R.. “Recent Work on the Concept of Happiness.” American Philosophical Quarterly 20 (1983): 115–34
    Dewey, John. Ethics. 1932. In vol. 7 of John Dewey: The Later Works, 1925–1953, Jo Ann Boydston, ed. Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1985
    Donner, Wendy. “John Stuart Mill's Concept of Utility.” Dialogue 22 (1983): 479–94
    Donner, Wendy. The Liberal Self: John Stuart Mill's Moral and Political Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991
    Donner, Wendy. “Mill's Utilitarianism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Mill, John Skorupski, ed. 255–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998
    Douglas, Charles. Introduction to The Ethics of John Stuart Mill, with introductory essays by Charles Douglas, ed. ⅰ–ⅽⅹⅹⅵ. Edinburgh and London: Blackwood, 1897
    Douglas, Charles. John Stuart Mill: A Study of His Philosophy. 1895. Folcroft, PA: Folcroft Library Editions, 1973
    Downie, R. S.Mill on Pleasure and Self-Development.” Philosophical Quarterly 16 (1966): 69–71
    Dryer, D. P. “Mill's Utilitarianism.” In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society, by John Stuart Mill. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. ⅼⅹⅲ–ⅽⅹⅲ. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969
    Dryer, D. P. “Justice, Liberty and the Principle of Utility in Mill.” In New Essays on John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism, Wesley E. Cooper, Kai Nielsen, and Steven C. Patten, eds. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, supp. vol. 5 (1979): 63–73
    Ebenstein, L.Mill's Theory of Utility.” Philosophy 60 (1985): 539–43
    Edwards, Rem B.Do Pleasures and Pains Differ Qualitatively?” Journal of Value Inquiry 9 (1975): 270–81
    Edwards, Rem B.. Pleasures and Pains: A Theory of Qualitative Hedonism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1979
    Edwards, Rem B.. “J. S. Mill and Robert Veatch's Critique of Utilitarianism.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 23 (1985): 181–200
    Edwards, Rem B.. “The Principle of Utility and Mill's Minimizing Utilitarianism.” Journal of Value Inquiry 20 (1986): 125–36
    Ellis, Brian. “Retrospective and Prospective Utilitarianism.” Nous 15 (1981): 325–39
    Falk, W. D. “‘Ought’ and Motivation.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, N. S. 48 (1947–8): 111–38. Reprinted in Readings in Ethical Theory, Wilfred Sellars and John Hospers, eds. 492–510. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1952
    Feagin, Susan L.Mill and Edwards on the Higher Pleasures.” Philosophy 58 (1983): 244–52
    Frankena, William. “Obligation and Motivation in Recent Moral Philosophy.” In Essays in Moral Philosophy, A. I. Melden, ed. 40–81. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1958
    Frankena, William. Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963
    Fullinwider, Robert K.On Mill's Analogy between Visible and Desirable.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 10 (1972): 17–22
    Galle, Peter. “Gruzalski and Ellis on Utilitarianism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59 (1981): 332–7
    Gaus, Gerald F.Mill's Theory of Moral Rules.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58 (1980): 265–79
    Gerrard, Steve. “Desire and Desirability: Bradley, Russell and Moore versus Mill.” In Early Analytic Philosophy. William W. Tait, ed. 37–74. Chicago: Open Court, 1997
    Gibbs, B. R.Higher and Lower Pleasures.” Philosophy 61 (1986): 31–59
    Goldinger, Milton. “Mill's Attack on Moral Conservatism.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 1 (1976): 61–7
    Gordon, Scott. “The Quality Problem in Utilitarianism.” The Mill News Letter 10 (1975): 9–13
    Graff, J. A.Mill's Quantity-Quality Distinction: A Defence.” The Mill News Letter 7 (1972): 14–18
    Green, T. H. Prolegomena to Ethics. 1883. 5th ed., 1906. Oxford: Clarendon, 1929
    Griffin, James. Well-Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986
    Griffin, N.A Note on Mr. Cooper's Reconstruction of Mill's ‘Proof.’Mind 81 (1972): 142–3
    Grote, John. An Examination of the Utilitarian Philosophy. Joseph Bickersteth Mayor, ed. Cambridge: Deighton, Bell, and Co., 1870
    Gruzalski, Bart. “Foreseeable Consequence Utilitarianism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59 (1981): 163–76
    Gunderson, Martin. “A Millian Analysis of Rights.” Ideas y Valores 106 (April 1998): 3–17
    Habibi, Don. “J. S. Mill's Revisionist Utilitarianism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 6 (1998): 89–114
    Hall, E. W.The ‘Proof’ of Utility in Bentham and Mill.” Ethics 60 (1949–50): 1–18
    Hancock, Roger. “Mill, Saints and Heroes.” The Mill News Letter 10 (1975): 13–15
    Harcourt, Edward. “Mill's ‘Sanctions,’ Internalization and the Self.” European Journal of Philosophy 6 (1998): 318–34
    Hare, R. M. Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981
    Harris, George W.Mill's Qualitative Hedonism.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 21 (1983): 503–12
    Harrison, Jonathan. “Utilitarianism, Universalisation, and Our Duty to Be Just.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society N. S. 53 (1952–3): 105–34
    Harrison, Jonathan. “The Expedient, the Right and the Just in Mill's Utilitarianism.” In New Essays in the History of Philosophy, Terence Penelhum and Roger A. Shiner, eds. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, supp. vol. 1 (1974): 93–107
    Harrod, R. F.Utilitarianism Revised.” Mind 45 (1936): 137–56
    Hearns, S. J.Was Mill a Moral Scientist?” Philosophy 67 (1992): 81–101
    Himma, Kenneth Einer. “The Interpretation of Mill's Utilitarianism.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 15 (1998): 455–73
    Himmelfarb, Gertrude. Introduction to Essays on Politics and Culture, by John Stuart Mill. Gertrude Himmelfarb, ed. New York: Doubleday, 1962; New York: Anchor Books, 1963
    Hoag, Robert W.Mill on Conflicting Moral Obligations.” Analysis 43 (1983): 49–54
    Hoag, Robert W.. “Happiness and Freedom: Recent Work on John Stuart Mill.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 15 (1986): 188–99
    Hoag, Robert W.. “Mill's Conception of Happiness as an Inclusive End.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 25 (1987): 417–31
    Hoag, Robert W.. “J. S. Mill's Language of Pleasures.” Utilitas 4 (1992): 247–78
    Hoffman, Christopher A.Desires and the Desirable.” Philosophical Forum 25 (1993): 19–32
    Holbrook, Daniel. Qualitative Utilitarianism. Lanham, MD and London: University Press of America, 1988
    Hutcheson, Francis. A System of Moral Philosophy. 1755. Reprinted in part in British Moralists, L. A. Selby-Bigge, ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1897
    Jenkins, Joyce I.Desires and Human Nature in J. S. Mill.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 14 (1997): 219–34
    Jones, Ernest. The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1964
    Jones, Hardy. “Mill's Argument for the Principle of Utility.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 38 (1978): 338–54
    Jones, Hardy. “John Stuart Mill as Moralist.” Journal of the History of Ideas 53 (1992): 287–308
    Joy, Glenn C., and McKinney, Audrey M.. “On a Supposed Inconsistency in J. S. Mill's Utilitarianism.” Southwest Philosophical Studies 14 (1992): 84–91
    Kamm, Josephine. John Stuart Mill in Love. London: Gordon and Cremonesi Publishers, 1977
    Kelly, P. J.Utilitarian Strategies in Bentham and John Stuart Mill.” Utilitas 2 (1990): 245–66
    Kleining, J.The Fourth Chapter of Mill's Utilitarianism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 48 (1970): 197–205
    Kraut, Richard. “Two Conceptions of Happiness.” Philosophical Review 88 (1979): 167–97
    Kretzman, N.Desire as Proof of Desirability.” Philosophical Quarterly 8 (1958): 246–58
    Kupperman, J.Do We Desire Only Pleasure?” Philosophical Studies 34 (1978): 451–4
    Lachs, John. “Two Views of Happiness in Mill.” The Mill News Letter 9 (1973): 16–20
    Lange, Berel and Stahl, Gary. “Mill's ‘Howlers’ and the Logic of Naturalism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 29 (1968–9): 562–74
    Lecky, William Edward Hartpole. History of European Morals. 2 vols. 1869. 3rd ed. New York: D. Appleton, 1890
    Levi, A. W.The Mental Crisis of John Stuart Mill.” Psychoanalytic Review 32 (1945): 86–101
    Levin, David Michael. “Some Remarks on Mill's Naturalism.” Journal of Value Inquiry 3 (1969): 291–7
    Long, Douglas G.‘Utility’ and the ‘Utility Principle’: Hume, Smith, Bentham, Mill.” Utilitas 2 (1990): 12–39
    Long, Roderick. “Mill's Higher Pleasures and the Choice of Character.” Utilitas 4 (1992): 279–97
    Long, W. H.The Legend of Mill's Proofs.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 5 (1967): 36–47
    Loren, L. M.Moore's Criticism of Mill.” Ratio 9 (1967): 84–90
    Lyons, David. Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965
    Lyons, David. “Mill's Theory of Morality.” Nous 10 (1976): 101–20
    Lyons, David. “Mill's Theory of Justice.” In Values and Morals: Essays in Honor of William Frankena, Charles Stevenson, and Richard Brandt, A. I. Goldman and J. Kim, eds. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1978
    Lyons, David. “Benevolence and Justice in Mill.” In The Limits of Utilitarianism, Harlan B. Miller and William H. Williams, eds. 42–70. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982
    Lyons, David. Rights, Welfare, and Mill's Moral Theory. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994
    Lyons, David. “Human Rights and the General Welfare.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (1996–7): 113–29
    Lyons, David, ed. Mill's Utilitarianism: Critical Essays. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 1997
    Mabbott, J. D.Interpretations of Mill's Utilitarianism.” Philosophical Quarterly 6 (1956): 115–20
    MacKensie, John S. A Manual of Ethics. 1883. 6th ed. London: University Tutorial Press, 1929
    Malinovich, Stanley. “The Happiness Criterion.” Philosophia 2 (1972): 195–203
    Malthus, Thomas. Principles of Political Economy. 1820. Reprint, New York: Augustus M. Kelly, 1951
    Malthus, Thomas. An Essay on the Principle of Population. 1798. Rev. ed., 1803. Reprinted as An Essay on Population, 2 vols. London: J. M. Dent; New York: E. P. Dutton, 1914. Reprinted as Population: The First Essay. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1959
    Mandelbaum, Maurice. “On Interpreting Mill's Utilitarianism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 6 (1968): 35–46
    Mandelbaum, Maurice. “Two Moot Issues in Mill's Utilitarianism.” In Mill: A Collection of Critical Essays, J. B. Schneewind, ed. 206–33. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1968
    Margolis, Joseph. “Mill's Utilitarianism Again.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 45 (1967): 179–84
    Marshall, John. “The Proof of Utility and Equity in Mill's Utilitarianism.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1973–4): 13–26
    Marshall, John. “Egalitarianism and General Happiness.” In The Limits of Utilitarianism, Harlan B. Miller and William H. Williams, eds. 35–41. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982
    Martin, Rex. “A Defence of Mill's Qualitative Hedonism.” Philosophy 47 (1972): 140–51
    Martineau, James. Types of Ethical Theory. 1855. 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1901
    Mazlish, Bruce. James and John Stuart Mill. New York: Basic Books, 1975
    McCloskey, H. J.An Examination of Restricted Utilitarianism.” The Philosophical Review 66 (1957): 466–85
    McCloskey, H. J.. John Stuart Mill: A Critical Study. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1971
    McGreal, Ian Philip. “Mill.” Chap. 2 in Analyzing Philosophical Arguments. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing, 1967
    McNaughton, Robert. “A Metrical Conception of Happiness.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 14 (1953–4): 172–83
    McNeilly, F. S.Pre-moral Appraisals.” The Philosophical Quarterly 8 (1958): 97–111
    Melden, A. I., ed. Essays in Moral Philosophy. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1958
    Mill, James. Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind. 2 vols. 1829; 2nd ed., John Stuart Mill, ed. 1869. Reprint, New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1967
    Mill, John Stuart. The Letters of John Stuart Mill. 2 vols. H. S. R. Elliot, ed. London: Longmans, Green, 1910
    Mill, John Stuart. Principles of Political Economy. 1848; 6th ed., 1871. Vols. 2–3 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1965
    Mill, John Stuart. Auguste Comte and Positivism. 1865. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969
    Mill, John Stuart. “Blakey's History of Moral Science.” 1833. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969
    Mill, John Stuart. “Nature.” In Three Essays on Religion. 1874. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969
    Mill, John Stuart. “Remarks on Bentham's Philosophy.” 1833. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969
    Mill, John Stuart. “Sedgwick's Discourse.” 1835. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969
    Mill, John Stuart. “Theism.” In Three Essays on Religion. 1874. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969
    Mill, John Stuart. Three Essays on Religion. 1874. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969
    Mill, John Stuart. Utilitarianism. 1861. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969
    Mill, John Stuart. “Utility of Religion.”' In Three Essays on Religion. 1874. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969
    Mill, John Stuart. The Later Letters of John Stuart Mill 1849–1873. Vols. 14–17 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Francis E. Mineka and Dwight N. Lindley, eds. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1972
    Mill, John Stuart. “Whewell on Moral Philosophy.” 1852. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969
    Mill, John Stuart. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive. 1843; 8th ed., 1871. Vols. 7–8 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1974
    Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty. 1859. In Essays on Politics and Society. Vol. 18 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1977
    Mill, John Stuart. “The Protagoras.” 1834. In Essays on Philosophy and the Classics. Vol. 11 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto, Buffalo, London: University of Toronto Press, 1978
    Mill, John Stuart. An Examination of Sir William Hamilton's Philosophy. 1865; 4th ed., 1872. Vol. 9 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1979
    Mill, John Stuart. Autobiography. 1873. Published with parallel texts of the Early Draft, John M. Robson and Jack Stillinger, eds. In Autobiography and Literary Essays. Vol. 1 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson and Jack Stillinger, eds. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1981
    Mill, John Stuart. The Subjection of Women. 1869. In Essays on Equality, Law, and Education. Vol. 21 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, John M. Robson, ed. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1984
    Mill, John Stuart. Miscellaneous Writings. Vol. 31 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, John M. Robson, ed. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1989
    Mill, John Stuart. Utilitarianism. Roger Crisp, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998
    Miller, Dale E.Internal Sanctions in Mill's Moral Psychology.” Utilitas 10 (1998): 68–82
    Miller, Harlan B., and William H. Williams, eds. The Limits of Utilitarianism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982
    Millgram, Elijah. “Mill's Proof of the Principle of Utility.” Ethics 110 (2000): 281–310
    Mitchell, Dorothy. “Mill's Theory of Value.” Theoria 36 (1970): 100–15
    Monro, David Hector. “Mill's Third Howler.” In Contemporary Philosophy in Australia. R. Brown and C. D. Rollins, eds. 190–203. London: Allen and Unwin, 1969
    Moore, G. E. Principia Ethica. 1903. London and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1959
    Moser, Shia. “A Comment on Mill's Argument for Utilitarianism.” Inquiry 6 (1963): 308–18
    Nagoka, Shigeo. “On Mill's Qualitative Distinction of Pleasures.” The Mill News Letter 20 (1985): 15–26
    Nakhnikian, G.Value and Obligation in Mill.” Ethics 62 (1951): 33–40
    Nielsen, Kai. “Monro on Mill's ‘Third Howler.’Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51 (1973): 63–9
    Nowell-Smith, P. H. Ethics. Baltimore: Penguin Books, 1954
    Ossowska, Maria. “Remarks on the Ancient Distinction between Bodily and Mental Pleasures.” Inquiry 4 (1961): 123–7
    Owen, Robert. A New View of Society: or, Essays on the Formation of Character. 1813; 4th ed., 1818. London: J. M. Dent and Sons, 1972
    Packe, Michael St. John. The Life of John Stuart Mill. London: Secker and Warburg, 1954
    Patten, S. C.Some Are Base, Some Are Sublime: A Defence of Hedonistic Utilitarianism.” Journal of Value Inquiry 14 (1980): 275–86
    Persson, Ingmar. “Mill's Derivation of the Intrinsic Desirability of Pleasure.” History of Philosopohy Quarterly 17 (2000): 297–310
    Peterfreund, Sheldon P.On Mill's Higher and Lower Pleasures.” Personalist 57 (1976): 411–12
    Philips, Michael. “A Pleasure Paradox.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59 (1981): 323–31
    Plamenatz, John. “John Stuart Mill.” Chap. 8 in The English Utilitarians. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 1958
    Plato. Protagoras. In The Dialogues of Plato. B. Jowett, trans. 1892. New York: Random House, 1937
    Popkin, R. H.A Note on the ‘Proof’ of Utility in J. S. Mill.” Ethics 61 (1950–1): 66–8
    Quinton, Anthony. Utilitarian Ethics. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1973
    Raphael, D. D.Fallacies in and about Mill's Utilitarianism.” Philosophy 30 (1955): 344–57
    Raphael, D. D.. “J. S. Mill's Proof of the Principle of Utility.” Utilitas 6 (1994): 55–63
    Rawls, John. “Two Concepts of Rules.” The Philosophical Review 64 (1955): 3–32
    Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971
    Regan, Donald. Utilitarianism and Co-operation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980
    Rescher, Nicholas. Distributive Justice. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1966
    Rice, Philip Blair. On the Knowledge of Good and Evil. New York: Random House, 1955
    Riley, Jonathan. Liberal Utilitarianism: Social Choice Theory and J. S. Mill's Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988
    Riley, Jonathan. “On Quantities and Qualities of Pleasure.” Utilitas 5 (1993): 291–300
    Riley, Jonathan. “Is Qualitative Hedonism Inconsistent?” Utilitas 11 (1999): 347–58
    Robson, J. M. The Improvement of Mankind: The Social and Political Thought of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1968
    Robson, J. M.. Textual Introduction to Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969
    Robson, John M., and Michael Laine, eds. James and John Stuart Mill: Papers of the Centenary Conference. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1976
    Rogers, Reginald A. P. A Short History of Ethics. 1911. Reprint, London: Macmillan, 1964
    Rohatyn, Dennis A.Hall and Mill's Proof.” Southwest Journal of Philosophy 2 (1971): 113–18
    Rohatyn, Dennis A.. “A Note on Kaufmann and Justice.” The Mill News Letter 6 (1971): 23–5
    Rohatyn, Dennis A.. “Mill, Kant, and Negative Utility.” Philosophia 5 (1975): 515–22
    Ross, W. D. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930
    Russell, Bertrand. A History of Western Philosophy. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1946
    Ryan, Alan. “Mill and the Naturalistic Fallacy.” Mind 75 (1966): 422–5
    Ryan, Alan. J. S. Mill. London and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974
    Ryan, Alan. The Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. London: Macmillan; New York: Pantheon Books, 1970; 2nd ed., New York: Macmillan, 1988
    Sabine, George H. A History of Political Theory. 3rd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1961
    Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey. “Mill's ‘Proof’ of the Principle of Utility: A More Than Half-Hearted Defense.” Social Philosophy and Policy 18 (2001): 330–60
    Scarre, Geoffrey. “Happiness for a Millian.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 7 (1999): 491–502
    Scarre, Geoffrey. “Donner and Riley on Qualitative Hedonism.” Utilitas 9 (1997): 355–60
    Schaller, Walter E.Punishment and the Utilitarian Criterion of Right and Wrong.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 29 (1991): 109–26
    Schneewind, J. B. “Concerning Some Criticisms of Mill's Utilitarianism, 1861–76.” In James and John Stuart Mill: Papers of the Centenary Conference, John M. Robson and Michael Laine, eds. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1976
    Schneewind, J. B., ed. Mill's Ethical Writings. London: Collier-Macmillan; New York: Collier Books, 1965
    Schneewind, J. B., ed. Mill: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, NY: Doubleday; London: Macmillan, 1968
    Selby-Bigge, L. A., ed. British Moralists, Being Selections from Writers Principally of the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Clarendon, 1897
    Sellars, Wilfred, and John Hospers, eds. Readings in Ethical Theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1952
    Semmel, Bernard. John Stuart Mill and the Pursuit of Virtue. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984
    Seth, James. “The Alleged Fallacies in Mill's ‘Utilitarianism.’Philosophical Review 17 (1908): 469–88
    Seth, James. A Study of Ethical Principles. 12th ed. New York: 1911
    Shaw, William H. Contemporary Ethics: Taking Account of Utilitarianism. Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1999
    Sheldon, Mark. “Community, History and Proof.” The Mill News Letter 14 (1979): 9–14
    Sidgwick, Henry. Outlines of the History of Ethics. 1886; 6th ed., 1931. London: Macmillan, 1954
    Sidgwick, Henry. Methods of Ethics. 1874; 7th ed., 1907. London: Macmillan, 1967
    Sidgwick, Henry. Practical Ethics: A Collection of Addresses and Essays. London: S. Sonnenschein; New York: Macmillan, 1898. Reprint, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998
    Singer, Marcus G.Actual Consequence Utilitarianism.” Mind 86 (1977): 67–77
    Singer, Marcus G.. “Incoherence, Inconsistency and Moral Theory: More on Actual Consequence Utilitarianism.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 20 (1982): 375–91
    Singer, Marcus G.. “Mill's Stoic Conception of Happiness and Pragmatic Conception of Utility.” Philosophy 75 (2000): 25–47
    Skorupski, John. “The Parts of Happiness.” Philosophical Books 26 (1985): 193–202
    Skorupski, John. John Stuart Mill. London and New York: Routledge, 1989
    Skorupski, John, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998
    Slote, Michael. “Consequentialism.” In Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd ed., 3 vols. Lawrence C. Becker and Charlotte B. Becker, eds. New York and London: Routledge, 2001
    Smart, J. J. C.Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism.” Philosophical Quarterly 4 (1956): 344–54
    Smart, J. J. C. “An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics.” In Utilitarianism: For and Against, J. J. C. Smart and Bernard Williams, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973
    Sobel, J. Howard. “‘Everyone,’ Consequences, and Generalization Arguments.” Inquiry 10 (1967): 373–404
    Soles, David E.Yet Another Paper on Mill's Proof.” Southwest Philosophy Review 14 (1998): 29–44
    Sorley, W. R. The Ethics of Naturalism. 2nd ed. Edinburgh, 1904
    Sorley, W. R.. A History of British Philosophy to 1900. 1920. Reprint, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965
    Sosa, Ernest. “Mill's Utilitarianism.” In Mill's Utilitarianism: Text and Criticism, James M. Smith and Ernest Sosa, eds. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1969
    Spence, G. W.The Psychology behind J. S. Mill's ‘Proof.’Philosophy 43 (1968): 18–28
    Stephen, Leslie. The English Utilitarians. 3 vols. 1900. Reprint in one vol., New York: Peter Smith, 1950
    Stewart, Robert Scott. “Art for Argument's Sake: Saving Mill from the Fallacy of Composition.” Journal of Value Inquiry 27 (1993): 443–53
    Stocker, Michael. “Mill on Desire and Desirability.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 7 (1969): 199–201
    Stout, A. K.But Suppose Everyone Did the Same.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 32 (1954): 1–29
    Strasser, Mark. “Mill's Higher and Lower Pleasures Reexamined.” International Studies in Philosophy 17 (1985): 51–72
    Strasser, Mark. “Actual versus Probable Utilitarianism.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 27 (1989): 585–97
    Strasser, Mark. The Moral Philosophy of John Stuart Mill: Toward Modifications of Contemporary Utilitarianism. Wakefield, VT: Longwood Academic Publishers, 1991
    Sumner, L. W.More Light on the Later Mill.” The Philosophical Review 83 (1974): 504–27
    Sumner, L. W. “The Good and the Right.” In New Essays on John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism, Wesley E. Cooper, Kai Nielsen, and Steven C. Patten, eds. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, supp. vol. 5 (1979): 99–114
    Sumner, L. W.. “Welfare, Happiness, and Pleasure.” Utilitas 4 (1992): 199–223
    Sutherland, J.An Alleged Gap in Mill's Utilitarianism.” Mind 11 (1886): 597–9
    Sylvester, Robert P.Pleasures: Higher and Lower.” Personalist 56 (1975): 129–37
    Taylor, Helen. Introductory Notice to Three Essays on Religion. 1874. In Essays on Ethics, Religion, and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969
    Ten, C. L.Mill and Utilitarianism.” Utilitas 13 (2001): 112–22
    Thomas, Laurence. “Moral Psychology.” In Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd ed., 3 vols. Lawrence C. Becker and Charlotte B. Becker, eds. New York and London: Routledge, 2001
    Thomas, William. Mill. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985
    Toulmin, S. E. An Examination of the Place of Reason in Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950
    Urmson, J. O.The Interpretation of the Philosophy of J. S. Mill.” Philosophical Quarterly 3 (1953): 33–40
    Urmson, J. O.. “A Defence of Intuitionism.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 75 (1974–5): 111–19
    Waldron, J.Kagen on Requirements, Mill on Sanctions.” Ethics 54 (1994): 310–24
    Wall, Grenville. “Mill on Happiness as an End.” Philosophy 57 (1982): 537–41
    Walter, Edward. “Revising Mill's Utilitarianism.” Journal of Social Philosophy 12 (1981): 5–11
    Walter, Edward. “Mill on Happiness.” Journal of Value Inquiry 16 (1982): 303–9
    Walter, Edward. “A Concept of Happiness.” Philosophy Research Archives 13 (1987–8): 137–50
    Warke, Tom. “Multi-Dimensional Utility and the Index Number Problem: Jeremy Bentham, J. S. Mill, and Qualitative Hedonism.” Utilitas 12 (2000): 176–203
    Warnock, Mary. Ethics Since 1900. London: Oxford University Press, 1960
    Warnock, Mary. Introduction to Utilitarianism and On Liberty, by John Stuart Mill, with an Introduction by Mary Warnock, ed. 2nd ed. 1–16. Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2003
    Wedar, Sven. Duty and Utility: A Study in English Moral Philosophy. Lund: Berlingska Boktryckeriet, 1951
    Wellman, Carl. “A Reinterpretation of Mill's Proof.” Ethics 69 (1958–9): 268–76
    Wertz, S. K.Composition and Mill's Utilitarian Principle.” Personalist 52 (1971): 417–31
    West, Henry Robison. “Act-Utilitarianism and Rule-Utilitarianism.” Ph.D. diss., Harvard University, 1964
    West, Henry Robison. “Reconstructing Mill's ‘Proof’ of the Principle of Utility.” Mind 81 (1972): 256–7
    West, Henry Robison. “Mill's Naturalism.” Journal of Value Inquiry 9 (1975): 67–9
    West, Henry Robison. “Mill's Moral Conservatism.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 1 (1976): 71–80
    West, Henry Robison. “Mill's Qualitative Hedonism.” Philosophy 51 (1976): 101–5
    West, Henry Robison. “Mill's ‘Proof’ of the Principle of Utility.” In The Limits of Utilitarianism, Harlan B. Miller and William H. Williams, eds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982
    West, Henry Robison. “Consequentialism.” In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Supplement. 101–2. New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan, 1996
    West, Henry Robison. “Mill, John Stuart.” In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Supplement. 346–7. New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan, 1996
    West, Henry Robison. “Mill, John Stuart.” In Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd ed., 3 vols. Lawrence C. Becker and Charlotte B. Becker, eds. 1098–1104. New York and London: Routledge, 2001
    White, Morton. “Desire and Desirability: A Rejoinder to a Posthumous Reply by John Dewey.” Journal of Philosophy 93 (1996): 229–42
    Wilson, Fred. “Mill's Proof That Happiness Is the Criterion of Morality.” Journal of Business Ethics 1 (1982): 59–72
    Wilson, Fred. “Mill's ‘Proof’ of Utility and the Composition of Causes.” Journal of Business Ethics 2 (1983): 135–58
    Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. G. E. M. Anscombe, trans. 3rd ed. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1971
    Wolf, Jean Claude. John Stuart Mill's ‘Utilitarismus.’ Freiburg and Munich: Alber, 1992
    Zimmerman, Michael J.Mill and the Consistency of Hedonism.” Philosophia 13 (1983): 317–35
    Zinkernagel, Peter. “Revaluation of J. S. Mill's Ethical Proof.” Theoria 18 (1952): 70–7

    Metrics

    Altmetric attention score

    Full text views

    Total number of HTML views: 0
    Total number of PDF views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    Book summary page views

    Total views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

    Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

    Accessibility standard: Unknown

    Why this information is here

    This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

    Accessibility Information

    Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.