Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-17T23:17:03.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Inverse polynomial optimization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Jean Bernard Lasserre
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Toulouse
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Again let P be the polynomial optimization problem f* = inf{f(x) : xK}, whose feasible set is the basic semi-algebraic set:

K ≔ {x ∈ ℝn : gj(x) ≥ 0, j = 1, …, m},

for some polynomials f, (gj) ⊂ ℝ[x]. As already mentioned, P is in general NP-hard and one goal of this book is precisely to describe methods to obtain (or at least approximate) f* and whenever possible a global minimizer x* ∈ K.

However, in many cases one is often satisfied with a local minimum only (for instance because the methods described in Chapter 6 are computationally too expensive and cannot be implemented for the problem on hand). On the other hand a local minimum can be obtained by running some local minimization algorithm choosen among those available in the literature. Typically in suchalgorithms, at a current iterate (i.e., some feasible solution yK) one checks whether some optimality conditions (e.g. the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) optimality conditions of Chapter 7) are satisfied within some ε-tolerance. However, those conditions are valid for any local minimum, and in fact, even for any stationary point of the Lagrangian. Moreover, in some practical situations the criterion f to minimize is subject to modeling errors or is questionable. In such a situation the practical meaning of a local (or global) minimum f* (and local (or global) minimizer) also becomes questionable. It could well be that the current solution y is in fact a global minimizer of an optimization problem P′ with the same feasible set as P but with a different criterion f. Therefore if f is “close enough” to f one might not be willing to spend an enormous amount of computing time and effort to find the global (or even local) minimum f* because one might be already satisfied with the current iterate y as a global minimizer of P′.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×