Tri-council policy statement: ethical conduct for research involving humans, 1998 (with 2000, 2002 updates). http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/english/policystatement/policystatement.cfm

Ball, Catherine. (1996). A diachronic study of relative markers in spoken and written English. Language Variation and Change. 8(2): 227–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baugh, John. (1980). Black street speech: its history, structure and survival. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Bayley, Robert. (2002). The quantitative paradigm. In The handbook of language variation and change. Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter and Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds), Malden and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 117–41.Google Scholar

Beal, Joan, Corrigan, Karen and Moisl, Hermann (eds). (to appear a). Using unconventional digital language corpora, vol. I, Synchronic corpora. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Beal, Joan, Corrigan, Karen and Moisl, Hermann (eds).(to appear b). Using unconventional digital language corpora, vol. II, Diachronic corpora. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Beals, Katharine, Denton, Jeannette, Knippen, Robert, et al. (eds). (1994). CLS 30: Papers from the 30th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: the parasession on variation in linguistic theory. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar

Bell, Allan. (1999). Styling the other to define the self: a study in New Zealand identity making. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 3(4): 523–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickerton, Derek. (1975). Dynamics of a creole system. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Blake, Renée. (1994). Resolving the don't count cases in the quantitative analysis of the copula in African American Vernacular English. Paper presented at Stanford University.

Boas, David, Meyerhoff, Miriam and Nagy, Naomi. (2002). Goldsearch. Durham, NH: English Department, University of New Hampshire.Google Scholar

Cameron, Deborah. (1990). Demythologizing sociolinguistics: why language does not reflect society. In Ideologies of language. Joseph, John E. and Taylor, Talbot J. (eds), London and New York: Routledge. 79–93.Google Scholar

Cedergren, Henrietta J. and Sankoff, David. (1974). Variable rules: performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language. 50(2): 333–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambers, J. K. (2003). Sociolinguistic theory: linguistic variation and its social significance. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Cornips, Leonie and Corrigan, Karen (eds). (2005). Syntax and variation: reconciling the biological and the social. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas and Jaworski, Adam. (1997). Introduction. In Sociolinguistics: a reader. Coupland, Nikolas and Jaworski, Adam (eds), New York: St Martin's Press. 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cukor-Avila, Patricia. (1995). The evolution of AAVE in a rural Texas community: an ethnolinguistic study. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.

Cukor-Avila, Patricia and Bailey, Guy. (2001). The effects of the race of the interviewer on sociolinguistic fieldwork. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 5: 254–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curme, George O. (1947). English grammar. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar

D'Arcy, Alexandra. (2005). Like: syntax and development. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto.

Denison, David. (1998). Syntax. In The Cambridge history of the English language, 1776–present day vol. IV. Romaine, Suzanne (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 92–329.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. (2000). Language variation as social practice. Oxford and Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Fasold, Ralph. (1972). Tense marking in Black English: a linguistic and social analysis. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Feagin, Crawford. (2002). Entering the community: fieldwork. In The handbook of language variation and change. Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter and Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds), Malden and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 20–39.Google Scholar

Godfrey, Elisabeth and Tagliamonte, Sali A. (1999). Another piece for the verbal -s story: evidence from Devon in southwest England. Language Variation and Change. 11(1): 87–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guy, Gregory R. (1988). Advanced varbrul analysis. In Linguistic change and contact. Ferrara, Kathleen, Brown, Becky, Walters, Keith and Baugh, John (eds), Austin, TX: Department of Linguistics, University of Texas at Austin. 124–36.Google Scholar

Guy, Gregory R.(1991a). Contextual conditioning in variable lexical phonology. Language Variation and Change. 3(2): 223–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guy, Gregory R.(1991b). Explanation in variable phonology: an exponential model of morphological constraints. Language Variation and Change. 3(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guy, Gregory R.(1993). The quantitative analysis of linguistic variation. In American dialect research. Preston, Dennis (ed.), Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 223–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoenigswald, Henry M. (1960). Language change and linguistic reconstruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Horvath, Barbara M. and Horvath, Ronald J. (2003). A closer look at the constraint hierarchy: order, contrast, and geographical scale. Language Variation and Change. 15(2): 143–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ito, Rika and Tagliamonte, Sali A. (2003). Well weird, right dodgy, very strange, really cool: layering and recycling in English intensifiers. Language in Society. 32(2): 257–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jespersen, Otto H. (1909/1949). A modern English grammar on historical principles: part vi: morphology. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar

Jones, Megan and Tagliamonte, Sali A. (2004). From Somerset to Samaná: Pre-verbal did in the voyage of English. Language Variation and Change. 16(2): 93–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroch, Anthony S. (1989). Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change. 1(3): 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krug, Manfred. (1998). Gotta – the tenth central modal in English? Social, stylistic and regional variation in the British national corpus as evidence of ongoing grammaticalization. In The major varieties of English, vol. I. Lindquist, Hans, Klintborg, Staffan, Levin, Magnus and Estling, Maria (eds), Växjö: Växjö University. 177–91.Google Scholar

Laberge, Suzanne. (1980). The changing distribution of indefinite pronouns in discourse. In Language use and the uses of language. Shuy, Roger W. and Shnukal, Anna (eds), Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 76–87.Google Scholar

Labov, William. (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. Word. 19: 273–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, William. (1966/1982). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Labov, William. (1969a). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language. 45(4): 715–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, William.(1969b). The logic of non-standard English. In Georgetown monographs on languages and linguistics 22. Alatis, John (ed.), Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 1–44.Google Scholar

Labov, William. (1970). The study of language in its social context. Studium Generale. 23(1): 30–87.Google Scholar

Labov, William. (1971). Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society. 1(1): 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, William.(1972a). The design of a sociolinguistic research project. Report of the Sociolinguistics Workshop, Central Institute of Indian Languages.

Labov, William. (1972b). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William. (1972c). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William. (1973). Sample questionnaire used by the project on linguistic change and variation. University of Pennsylvania, 1 March 1973.Google Scholar

Labov, William.(1982). Building on empirical foundations. In Perspectives on historical linguistics. Lehmann, Winfred P. and Malkiel, Yakov (eds), Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 17–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, William.(1984). Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In Language in use: readings in sociolinguistics. Baugh, John and Sherzer, Joel (eds), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 28–54.Google Scholar

Labov, William. (1994). Principles of linguistic change, vol. I, Internal factors. Cambridge and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Labov, William. (2001). Principles of linguistic change, vol. II, Social factors. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Labov, William.(to appear). Quantitative reasoning in linguistics. In Sociolinguistics/Soziolinguistik. Ammon, U., Dittmar, N., Mattheier, K. and Trudgill, Peter (eds), Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. http://www.ling.upenn.edu/~wlabor/home.html

Labov, William, Cohen, Paul, Robins, Clarence, et al. (1968). A study of the non-standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City. Final report, Co-operative Research Report 3288, vol. I. US Regional Survey.

Labov, William and Waletzky, Joshua. (1967). Narrative analysis: oral versions of personal experience. In Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Helm, June (ed.), Seattle: University of Washington Press. 12–44.Google Scholar

Lavandera, Beatriz R. (1978). Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop?Language in Society. 7(2): 171–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lavandera, Beatriz.(1982). Le principe de réinterprétation dans la théorie de la variation. In Die soziolinguistik in romanischsprachigen Ländern/La sociolinguistique dans les pays de langue romane. Dittmar, Norbert and Schlieben-Lange, Brigitte (eds), Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag. 87–95.Google Scholar

Macaulay, Ronald K. S. (1976). Social class and language in Glasgow. Language in Society. 5: 173–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macaulay, Ronald K. S.(1991). ‘Coz it izny spelt when they say it’: displaying dialect in writing. American Speech. 66(3): 280–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Stefan and Wolfram, Walt. (1998). The sentence in African-American Vernacular English. In African-American English. Mufwene, Salikoko, Rickford, John, Bailey, Guy and Baugh, John (eds), London and New York: Routledge. 11–36.Google Scholar

Meechan, Marjory and Foley, Michele. (1994). On resolving disagreement: linguistic theory and variation – there's bridges. Language Variation and Change. 6(1): 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meillet, Antoine. (1967). The comparative method in historical linguistics. Paris: Librairie Honoré Champion.Google Scholar

Milroy, James. (1992). Linguistic variation and change. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Milroy, Lesley. (1980). Language and social networks. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar

Milroy, Lesley. (1987). Observing and analysing natural language. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Milroy, Lesley and Gordon, Matthew. (2003). Sociolinguistics: method and interpretation. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murray, James A. H. (1873). The dialect of the southern counties of Scotland: its pronunciation, grammar and historical relations. London: Philological Society.Google Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu. (1997). The processes of adverb derivation in late middle and early modern English. In Grammaticalization at work: studies of long term developments in English. Rissanen, Matti, Kytö, Merja and Heikkonen, Kirsi (eds), Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 145–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu and Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. (2003). Historical sociolinguistics: language change in Tudor and Stuart England. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar

Paolillo, John. (2002). Analyzing linguistic variation: statistical models and methods. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Paradis, Claude. (1996). Interactional conditioning of linguistic heterogeneity. In Towards a social science of language, vol. II, Social interaction and discourse structures. Guy, Gregory R., Feagin, Crawford, Schiffrin, Deborah and Baugh, John (eds), Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 115–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Payne, Arvilla. (1976). The acquisition of the phonological system of a second dialect. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

Pintzuk, Susan. (1995). Variation and change in old English clause structure. Language Variation and Change. 7(2): 229–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poplack, Shana. (1979). Function and process in a variable phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

Poplack, Shana.(1989). The care and handling of a megacorpus: the Ottawa-Hull French project. In Language change and variation. Fasold, Ralph and Schiffrin, Deborah (eds), Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 411–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poplack, Shana.(1993). Variation theory and language contact. In Variation theory and language contact: American dialect research. Preston, Dennis (ed.), Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 251–86.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana(ed.). (2000). The English history of African American English. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana and Meechan, Marjory. (1998). Introduction: how languages fit together in codemixing: instant loans, easy conditions: the productivity of bilingual borrowing. Journal of Bilingualism. 2(2) (special issue): 127–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poplack, Shana and Tagliamonte, Sali A. (1989). There's no tense like the present: verbal -s inflection in Early Black English. Language Variation and Change. 1(1): 47–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poplack, Shana and Tagliamonte, Sali A.(1991). African American English in the diaspora: evidence from old-line Nova Scotians. Language Variation and Change. 3(3): 301–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poplack, Shana and Tagliamonte, Sali A.(1993). African American English in the diaspora: evidence from old-line Nova Scotians. In Focus on Canada. Clarke, Sandra (ed.), Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 109–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poplack, Shana and Tagliamonte, Sali A.(1994). -S or nothing: marking the plural in the African American diaspora. American Speech. 69(3): 227–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poplack, Shana and Tagliamonte, Sali A.(1998). Nothing in context: variation, grammaticization and past time marking in Nigerian Pidgin English. In Changing meanings, changing functions: papers relating to grammaticalization in contact languages. Baker, Philip and Syea, Anand (eds), Westminster: University of Westminster Press. 71–94.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana and Tagliamonte, Sali A.(2001). African American English in the diaspora: tense and aspect. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana and Tagliamonte, Sali A.(2005). Back to the present: verbal -s in the (African American) diaspora. In Transported dialects: the legacies of non-standard colonial English. Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poplack, Shana, Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Eze, Ejike. (2000a). Reconstructing the source of early African American English plural marking: a comparative study of English and creole. In The English history of African American English. Poplack, Shana (ed.), Malden and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 73–98.Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana, Van Herk, Gerard and Harvie, Dawn. (2000b). Ottawa historical grammar resource on English: unpublished documentation and user's manual. University of Ottawa.

Preston, Dennis. (1985). The li'l abner syndrome: written representations of speech. American Speech. 60(4): 328–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Preston, Dennis.(1996). Variationist perspectives on second language acquisition. In Second language acquisition and linguistic variation. Bayley, Robert and Preston, Dennis (eds), Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Preston, Dennis. (2000). Mowr and mowr bayud spellin': confessions of a sociolinguist. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 4(4): 614–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quirk, Randolph. (1957). Relative clauses in educated spoken English. English Studies. 38: 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rand, David and Patera, Tatiana. (1992). Concorder. Computer program. Montreal: Centre de Recherches Mathématiques, University of Montreal. Version 1.1S.

Rand, David and Sankoff, David. (1990). Goldvarb 2.1: a variable rule application for the Macintosh. Montreal: Centre de Recherches Mathématiques, University of Montreal. Version 2. http://www.crm.umontreal.ca/~sankoff/GoldVarb_Eng.html

Rickford, John R. (1999). African American Vernacular English. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Roberts, Ian and Rousseau, Anna. (2003). Syntactic change: a minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, John, Lawrence, Helen and Tagliamonte, Sali. (2001). Goldvarb 2001. Department of Language and Linguistic Science, University of York. http://www.york.ac.uk/depts/lang/webstuff/goldvarb/.

Rousseau, Pascale and Sankoff, David. (1978a). A solution to the problem of grouping speakers. In Linguistic variation: models and methods. Sankoff, David (ed.), New York: Academic Press. 97–117.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Pascale and Sankoff, David.(1978b). Advances in variable rule methodology. In Linguistic variation: models and methods. Sankoff, David (ed.), New York: Academic Press. 57–69.Google Scholar

Sankoff, David. (1975). Varbrul 2. Unpublished program and documentation.

Sankoff, David. (1978). Probability and linguistic variation. Synthèse. 37: 217–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sankoff, David.(1982). Sociolinguistic method and linguistic theory. In Logic, methodology, philosophy of science. Cohen, L. Jonathan, Los, Jerzy, Pfeiffer, Helmut and Podewski, Klaus Peter (eds), Amsterdam: North Holland/Warsaw: Polish Scientific. 677–89.Google Scholar

Sankoff, David.(1988a). Problems of representativeness. In Sociolinguistics: an international handbook of the science of language and society. Ammon, Ulrich, Dittmar, Norbert and Mattheier, Klaus J. (eds), Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 899–903.Google Scholar

Sankoff, David.(1988b). Sociolinguistics and syntactic variation. In Linguistics: the Cambridge survey. Newmeyer, Frederick J. (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 140–61.Google Scholar

Sankoff, David.(1988c). Variable rules. In Sociolinguistics: an international handbook of the science of language and society. Ammon, Ulrich, Dittmar, Norbert and Mattheier, Klaus J. (eds), Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 984–97.Google Scholar

Sankoff, David and Labov, William. (1979). On the uses of variable rules. Language in Society. 8(2): 189–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sankoff, David and Rousseau, Pascale. (1979). Categorical contexts and variable rules. In Papers from the Scandinavian symposium on syntactic variation, Stockholm, May 18–19, 1979. Jacobson, Sven (ed.), Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell. 7–22.Google Scholar

Sankoff, David and Rousseau, Pascale. (1989). Statistical evidence for rule ordering. Language Variation and Change. 1(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sankoff, David and Sankoff, Gillian. (1973). Sample survey methods and computer-assisted analysis in the study of grammatical variation. In Canadian languages in their social context. Darnell, Regna (ed.), Edmonton: Linguistic Research Inc. 7–63.Google Scholar

Sankoff, David, Tagliamonte, Sali and Smith, Eric. (2005). Goldvarb X. Computer program. Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto, Canada. http://individual.utoronto.ca/tagliamonte/Goldvarb/GV_index.htm

Sankoff, David and Thibault, Pierrette. (1981). Weak complementarity: tense and aspect in Montreal French. In Syntactic change, vol. 25. Johns, B. B. and Strong, D. R. (eds), Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. 205–16.Google Scholar

Sankoff, Gillian. (1973). Above and beyond phonology in variable rules. In New ways of analyzing variation in English. Bailey, Charles-James N. and Shuy, Roger W. (eds), Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 44–62.Google Scholar

Sankoff, Gillian.(1974). A quantitative paradigm for the study of communicative competence. In Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. Bauman, Richard and Sherzer, Joel (eds), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 18–49.Google Scholar

Sankoff, Gillian. (ed.). (1980). The social life of language. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sankoff, Gillian and Cedergren, Henrietta. (1972). Some results of a sociolinguistic study of Montreal French. In Linguistic diversity in Canadian society. Darnell, Regna (ed.), Edmonton: Linguistic Research Inc. 61–87.Google Scholar

Sankoff, Gillian and Thibault, Pierrette. (1980). The alternation between the auxiliaries avoir and être in Montréal French. In The social life of language. Sankoff, Gillian (ed.), Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press. 311–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shuy, Roger. (1983). Unexpected by-products of fieldwork. American Speech. 58(4): 345–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shuy, Roger, Wolfram, Walt and Riley, William. (1968). Field techniques in an urban language study. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Sigley, Robert. (2003). The importance of interaction effects. Language Variation and Change. 15(2): 227–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Jennifer. (2001). Ye ø na hear that kind o' things: negative do in Buckie. English World-Wide 21(2): 231–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swan, Michael. (1995). Practical English usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A. (1997). ‘The’, [?], or t'other: uncovering the patterns of York English definite articles. Unpublished manuscript.

Tagliamonte, Sali A.(1998). Was/were variation across the generations: view from the city of York. Language Variation and Change. 10(2): 153–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A.(2002). Comparative sociolinguistics. In Handbook of language variation and change. Chambers, Jack, Trudgill, Peter and Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds), Malden and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 729–63.Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A.(2004). Someth[in]'s go[ing] on!: variable ing at ground zero. In Language variation in Europe: papers from the second international conference on language variation in Europe, ICLAVE 2. Britt-Louise Gunnarsson, Lena Bergström, Gerd Eklund, Staffan Fidell, Lise H. Hansen, Angela Karstadt, Bengt Nordberg, Eva Sundergren and Mats Thelander (eds), Uppsala, Sweden, 12–14 June 2003.

Tagliamonte, Sali A.(2005). So who? Like how? Just what? Discourse markers in the conversations of young Canadians. Journal of pragmatics (special issue). 37(11): 1896–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A.(to appear a). Representing real language: consistency, trade-offs and thinking ahead! In Using unconventional digital language corpora, vol. I, Synchronic corpora. Beal, Joan, Corrigan, Karen and Moisl, Hermann (eds), Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Tagliamonte, Sali A.(to appear b). ‘So cool, right?’: Canadian English entering the 21st century. Canadian Journal of Linguistics (special issue).

Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Hudson, Rachel. (1999). Be like et al. Beyond America: the quotative system in British and Canadian youth. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 3(2): 147–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Ito, Rika. (2002). Think really different: continuity and specialization in the English adverbs. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 6(2): 236–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Molfenter, Sonja. (2005). Kids in new contexts: acquiring a second dialect of the same language. Paper presented at Methods XII: the 12th international conference on methods in dialectology, Moncton, NB, 1–5 August 2005.

Tagliamonte, Sali A., Molfenter, Sonja and King, Matthew. (2004). Taking it to the streets! A sociolinguistic survey of old-line Toronto. Paper presented at New Ways of Analysing Variation 33, Ann Arbor, 1 Oct 2004.

Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Poplack, Shana. (1988). How Black English past got to the present: evidence from Samaná. Language in Society. 17(4): 513–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Poplack, Shana. (1993). The zero-marked verb: testing the creole hypothesis. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages. 8(2): 171–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A., Poplack, Shana and Eze, Ejike. (1997). Pluralization patterns in Nigerian Pidgin English. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages. 12(1): 103–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Roberts, Chris. (2005). So cool, so weird, so innovative! The use of intensifiers in the television series Friends. American Speech. 80(3): 280–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Smith, Jennifer. (2000). Old was; new ecology: viewing English through the sociolinguistic filter. In The English history of African American English. Poplack, Shana (ed.), Oxford and Malden: Blackwell Publishers. 141–71.Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Smith, Jennifer. (2005). No momentary fancy! The zero ‘complementizer’ in English dialects. English Language and Linguistics. 9(2): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A., Smith, Jennifer and Lawrence, Helen. (2005). No taming the vernacular! Insights from the relatives in northern Britain. Language Variation and Change. 17(2): 75–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A., Smith, Jennifer and Lawrence, Helen.(to appear). English dialects in the British isles in cross-variety perspective: a base-line for future research. In Dialects across borders: selected papers from the 11th international conference on methods in dialectology, Joensuu, August 2002. Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani, Palander, Marjatta and Penttilä, Esa (eds), Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRef

Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Temple, Rosalind. (2005). New perspectives on an ol' variable: (t,d) in British English. Language Variation and Change. 17(3): 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, Ann. (1994). The change from SOV to SVO in Ancient Greek. Language Variation and Change. 6(1): 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, Ann.(to appear). The York–Toronto–Helsinki parsed corpus of Old English Prose. In Using unconventional digital language corpora, Vol. II, Diachronic corpora. Beal, Joan, Corrigan, Karen and Moisl, Hermann (eds), Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Temple, Rosalind. (2003). What is ‘-t,d deletion’? A new look at an old sociolinguistic variable. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, 3–9 August 2003. 1835–8.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. (1974). The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter(ed.). (1978). Sociolinguistic patterns in British English. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. (1999). New-dialect formation and dedialectalisation: embryonic and vestigial variants. Journal of English Linguistics. 27(4): 319–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. (2000). Sociolinguistics: an introduction to language in society. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Warner, Anthony. (1993). English auxiliaries: structure and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiner, Judith and Labov, William. (1983). Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics. 19(1): 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William and Herzog, Marvin. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Directions for historical linguistics. Lehmann, Winfred P. and Malkiel, Yakov (eds), Austin: University of Texas Press. 95–188.Google Scholar

Wolfram, Walt. (1969). A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Wolfram, Walt. (1991). The linguistic variable: fact and fantasy. American Speech. 66(1): 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolfram, Walt.(1993). Identifying and interpreting variables. In American dialect research. Preston, Dennis (ed.), Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 193–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolfram, Walt and Schilling-Estes, Natalie. (1995). Moribund dialects and the endangerment canon: the case of the Ocracoke brogue. Language. 71(4): 696–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, Robert and Bayley, Robert. (1996). Varbrul analysis for second language acquisition research. In Second language acquisition and linguistic variation. Bayley, Robert and Preston, Dennis R. (eds), Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 253–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar