Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T11:14:35.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Generative process model building

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Thomas J. Fararo
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Pierre Demeulenaere
Affiliation:
Université de Paris IV
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Theoretical sociology deals with theoretical problems and methods, formulating principles and models that incorporate generative mechanisms in applications to abstract or concrete cases within a specified scope (Fararo 1989). This approach is “generalizing” rather than “historical” or particularizing in its orientation (Berger et al. 1972). Part of what this means is that the importance of an empirical study is tied to the theoretical problem in the context of explanatory theory development. This viewpoint has governed the growth of a variety of theoretical research programs in sociology (Berger and Zelditch 2002). Theory-driven studies of cooperation, such as those stimulated by the pioneering work of Axelrod (1984), are in this spirit.

Given the generalizing orientation, we can distinguish between present-day embodiments of it and certain mid-twentieth-century efforts that are often grouped under the rubric “general theory.” I am referring to not only Parsons but also, by contrast, Homans. Their earlier efforts differ from present-day contributions in that they had the aim of general theoretical synthesis. They aspired to create a solid theoretical foundation for not only sociology but the other social sciences as well. Parsons initiated his synthesis efforts with a focus on the problem of social order. Less obviously, this was true of Homans as well. The order problem in his theoretical works is transmuted into a theory of spontaneous order – how structures of stable social relations emerge in social interaction, as in the treatment of what he called “the internal system” (Homans 1950).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J.R. 1993. Rules of the Mind. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Axten, N. and Fararo, T.J.. 1977. “The information processing representation of institutionalized social action,” in Krishnan, P. (ed.), Mathematical Models of Sociology. Sociological Review Monograph 24: 35–77. Keele, UK.Google Scholar
Bainbridge, W., Brent, E., Carley, K., Heise, D., Macy, M., Markovsky, B. and Skvoretz, J.. 1994. “Artificial social intelligence,” Annual Review of Sociology 20: 407–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, J. and Zelditch, M., Jr. (eds.) 1985. Status, Rewards and Influence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Zelditch, MBerger, J 2002. New Directions in Contemporary Sociological Theory. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Berger, J., Zelditch, M., Jr. and Anderson, B.. 1972. “Introduction,” in Berger, J., Zelditch, M., Jr. and Anderson, B. (eds.), Sociological Theories in Progress, vol. ii. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Berger, P. and Luckmann, T.. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, R.B. 1953. Scientific Explanation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cederman, L. 2005. “Computational models of social forms: advancing generative process theory,” American Journal of Sociology 110(4): 864–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, I.D. 1980. “Social process and hierarchy formation in small groups: a comparative perspective,” American Sociological Review 45: 905–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, I.D. and Lindquist, W.B.. 2009. “Dominance hierarchies,” in Hedström, P. and Bearman, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cherkaoui, M. 2005. Invisible Codes: Essays on Generative Mechanisms. Oxford: Bardwell Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, B.P. 1963. Conflict and Conformity: a Probability Model and its Application. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Davis, A., Gardner, B.B. and Gardner, M.R.. 1941. Deep South: a Social Anthropological Study of Caste and Class. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Evans, J.B. 1988. Structures of Discrete Event Simulation. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Fararo, T.J. 1969. “The nature of mathematical sociology,” Social Research 36(1): 75–92.Google Scholar
Fararo, T.J. 1972. “Dynamics of status equilibration,” in Berger, J., Zeldtich, M., Jr. and Anderson, B. (eds.), Sociological Theories in Progress, vol. ii. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, Chapter 9.Google Scholar
Fararo, T.J. 1973. Mathematical Sociology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fararo, T.J. 1989. The Meaning of General Theoretical Sociology. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fararo, T.J. 2001. Social Action Systems. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
Fararo, T.J. and Butts, C.. 1999. “Advances in generative structuralism: structured agency and multilevel dynamics,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 24(1): 1–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fararo, T.J. and Hummon, N.P.. 1994. “Discrete event simulation and theoretical models in sociology,” Advances in Group Processes 11: 25–66.Google Scholar
Fararo, T.J. and Kosaka, K.. 2003. Generating Images of Stratification: a Formal Theory. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fararo, T.J. and Skvoretz, J.. 1984. “Institutions as production systems,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 10: 117–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fararo, T.J. and Skvoretz, J. 1986. “Action and institution, network and function: the cybernetic concept of social structure,” Sociological Forum 1: 219–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fararo, T.J. and Skvoretz, J. 2002. “Theoretical integration and generative structuralism,” in Berger, J. and Zelditch, M., Jr. (eds.), New Directions in Contemporary Sociological Theory. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 295–316.Google Scholar
Fararo, T.J., Skvoretz, J. and Kosaka, K.. 1994. “Advances in E-state structuralism: further studies in dominance structure formation,” Social Networks 16(3): 233–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heise, D.R. 1989. “Modeling event structures,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 14: 139–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homans, G.C. 1950. The Human Group. New York: Harcourt Brace & World.Google Scholar
Homans, G.C. 1958. “Social behavior as exchange,” American Journal of Sociology 63: 597–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homans, G.C. 1974 [1961]. Social Behavior: its Elementary Forms, rev. edn. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Hummon, N.P. and Fararo, T.J.. 1995a. “Actors and networks as objects,” Social Networks 17: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummon, N.P. and Fararo, T.J. 1995b. “The emergence of computational sociology,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 20(2–3): 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzo, G. 2007. “Variables, mechanisms and simulations: can the three methods be synthesized?Revue française de sociologie 48, Supplement: 35–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, K. and Fararo, T.J.. (eds.) 2006. Purpose, Meaning and Action: Control Systems Theories in Sociology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
McPhail, C., Schweingruber, D.S. and Ceobanu, A.. 2006. “Purposive collective action,” in McClelland, K. and Fararo, T.J. (eds.), Purpose, Meaning and Action: Control Systems Theories in Sociology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, Chapter 3.Google Scholar
Margenau, H. 1950. The Nature of Physical Reality. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Miller, G.A., Galanter, E. and Pribram, K.. 1960. Plans and the Structure of Behavior. New York: Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadel, S.F. 1951. Foundations of Social Anthropology. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Newell, A. and Simon, H.A.. 1972. Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. 1937. The Structure of Social Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. 1951. The Social System. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. 1960. “Pattern variables revisited,” American Sociological Review 25: 467–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powers, W.T. 1973. Behavior: the Control of Perception. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Simon, H.A. 1952. “A formal theory of interaction in social groups,” American Sociological Review 17: 202–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skvoretz, J. and Fararo, T.J.. 1988. “Dynamics of the formation of stable dominance structures,” in Webster, M. and Foschi, M. (eds.), Status Generalization. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, Chapter 17.Google Scholar
Skvoretz, J. and Fararo, T.J. 1995. “The Evolution of Systems of Social Interaction.” Current Perspectives in Social Theory 15: 275–299. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Skvoretz, J. and Fararo, T.J. 1996. “Status and participation in task groups: a dynamic network model,” American Journal of Sociology 101: 1366–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skvoretz, J., Webster, M. and Whitmeyer, J.. 1999. “Status orders in task discussion groups,” Advances in Group Processes 16: 199–218.Google Scholar
Veblen, T. 2007 [1899]. The Theory of the Leisure Class. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A.N. 1925. Science and the Modern World. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, M. 2002. An Introduction to Multi-Agent Systems. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×