Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T04:22:27.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Conceptualising quantification before settlement: Activities and issues underlying the conception and use of measurement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Iain Morley
Edited by
Iain Morley  and
Colin Renfrew
Iain Morley
Affiliation:
The MacDonald Institute for Archaeological Research
Colin Renfrew
Affiliation:
The MacDonald Institute for Archaeological Research
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter discusses a number of different aspects of measurement relevant to past societies, and the archaeological record. First, it explores some of the concepts underlying different types of measurement, the differences between them, and the implications of those differences for how measurement might be, and has been, conceived. Different types and concepts of measurement are labelled with specific terms, and the relationships between them considered. Whilst it is hoped that the concepts discussed and terms used might be useful in wider considerations of measurement, the chapter is written keeping in mind the nature and implications of the types of measurement activity that are likely to have been important in the context of hunter-gatherer subsistence, especially concepts of time, cycles and distance. In particular, this chapter seeks to highlight the fact that a great many of the activities that were carried out by past societies would have involved quantification in some form. In order to explore fully the use of measurement of the world and beyond in past societies we must explore the implications of the activities for which we do have archaeological evidence, in addition to looking for direct evidence of quantification.

The final sections of the chapter in particular relate some of these conceptualisations – especially of time and cycles of events – to supernatural and spiritual systems of belief for their explanation, and ritual systems of practice for their mediation.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Archaeology of Measurement
Comprehending Heaven, Earth and Time in Ancient Societies
 , pp. 7 - 18
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barber, E. W. and Barber, P. T., 2004. When They Severed Earth from Sky: How the Human Mind Shapes Myth. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R., 1991. Comment on F. d'Errico: Microscopic and statistical criteria for the identification of prehistoric systems of notation. Rock Art Research 8:2, 89–91.Google Scholar
Bloch, M., 1998. How We Think They Think: Anthropological Approaches to Cognition, Memory, and Literacy. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
Boyer, P., 1996. What makes anthropomorphism natural: Intuitive ontology and cultural representation. Journal of the Anthropological Institute 2, 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, P., 2001. Religion Explained: The Human Instincts That Fashion Gods, Spirits and Ancestors. William Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Brown, C. H., 1983. Where do cardinal direction terms come from?Anthropological Linguistics 25, 121–61.Google Scholar
D'Errico, F., 1991. Microscopic and statistical criteria for the identification of prehistoric systems of notation. Rock Art Research 8:2, 83–89; 91–93.Google Scholar
Endicott, K., 1979. Batak Negrito Religion: The World-View and Rituals of a Hunting and Gathering People of Peninsula Malaysia. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E., 1965. Theories of Primitive Religion. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Fowler, C. S. and Turner, N. J., 1999. Ecological/cosmological knowledge and land management among hunter-gatherers. In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers, eds. Lee, R. B. and Daly, R.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 419–25.Google Scholar
Gamble, C., 1999. The Palaeolithic Societies of Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gibbon, W., 1964. Asiatic parallels in North American star lore: Ursa Major. Journal of American Folklore 77, 236–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbon, W., 1972. Asiatic parallels in North American star lore: Milky Way, Pleiades, Orion. Journal of American Folklore 85, 236–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, H., 1995. Psychology. 4th ed. Norton, W. W., London.
Guthrie, S., 1993. Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hinde, R. A., 1999. Why Gods Persist: A Scientific Approach to Religion. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Ingold, T., 1999. On the social relations of the hunter-gatherer band. In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers, eds. Lee, R. B. and Daly, R.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lee, R. B. and Daly, R., 1999. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lévy-Bruhl, L., 1935/1973. Primitives and the Supernatural. Translated by Clare, L. A.. Haskell House Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
Marshack, A., 1964. Lunar notation on Upper Paleolithic remains. Science 184, 28–46.Google Scholar
Marshack, A., 1972. Upper Paleolithic notation and symbol. Science 178, 817–28CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshack, A., 1991. The Tai plaque and calendrical notation in the Upper Palaeolithic. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 1, 25–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C. and Scarre, C., 1998. Cognition and Material Culture: The Archaeology of Symbolic Storage. McDonald Institute, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tylor, E. B., 1871. Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom. John Murray, London.Google Scholar
Williamson, R. A and Farrer, C. R., 1992. Earth and Sky: Visions of the Cosmos in Native American Folklore. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Zubrow, E. B. W. and Daly, P. T., 1998. Symbolic behaviour: The origin of a spatial perspective. In Cognition and Material Culture: The Archaeology of Symbolic Storage, eds. Renfrew, C. and Scarre, C.. McDonald Institute, Cambridge, 157–74.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×