Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T12:45:20.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - On the Electrophysiology of Language Comprehension: Implications for the Human Language System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2009

Matthew W. Crocker
Affiliation:
Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Germany
Martin Pickering
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Charles Clifton
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Get access

Summary

This chapter is on syntactic and semantic processes during on-line language comprehension. We present event-related brain potential (ERP) data from a series of experiments using both written and spoken input, focussing mainly on sentence processing. The data are discussed in terms of the constraints that they impose on the architecture of the human language system, in particular with respect to the separation of syntactic and semantic knowledge bases.

The issue of the separation of different linguistic knowledge sources is an underlying theme in much psycholinguistic research and is especially relevant for a number of contrasting models on parsing. Although linguistic theory has to a large extent postulated distinct representational systems for structure and meaning, psycholinguistic models of the parsing process differ in their assumptions about the separability of syntactic and semantic knowledge bases and of the processing operations that tap into these bases.

One class of models – referred to as garden-path models in the literature – posits a separate syntactic knowledge base. This linguistic knowledge is used for the computation of a separate intermediate level of representation for the syntactic structure of a sentence. Garden-path models claim that the construction of an intermediate syntactic level is a necessary and obligatory step during sentence processing, if not for all structural assignments, then at least for a significant subset of them (e.g., Clifton & Ferreira, 1989; Frazier, 1987; Frazier & Clifton, 1996; Friederici & Mecklinger, 1996; Rayner, Garrod, & Perfetti, 1992).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×