ʿAbduh, M. 1324/1906. Risālat al-tawḥīd. Cairo.Google Scholar

Alexander of Aphrodisias. 1887. De anima. In Scripta minor, ed. Bruns, I.. Berlin.Google Scholar

Alexander of Aphrodisias. 2001. Alexander of Aphrodisias on the Cosmos, ed. Genequand, C.. Brill: Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander of Aphrodisias. 2004. Supplement to “On the Soul,” trans. Sharples, R. W.. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Alexander of Aphrodisias. 2010. Mēmrā ḏ-ʿal ʿellāṯēh d-hānā kol in “L’épitomé syriaque du traité Sur les causes du tout d’Alexandre d’Aphrodise attribué à Serge de Rešʿaynā,” ed. and trans. Fiori, E.. Le Muséon 123: 127–158.Google Scholar

Al-ʿĀmirī, A. 1957. Kitāb al-Saʿāda wa-al-isʿād, ed. Minovi, M.. Wiesbaden: University of Tehran Publications.Google Scholar

Aquinas, . 1993. Commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Litzinger, C. I.. South Bend: Saint Augustine Press.Google Scholar

Aquinas, . 1996. Commentary on the Book of Causes [Super Librum de causis expositio], trans. Guagliardo, V. A., Hess, C. R., and Taylor, R. C.. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1870. Aristotelis Opera ex recensione Immanuelis Bekkeri edidit Academia Regia Borussica, Berolini, vol. v. A qui ferebantur librorum fragmenta coll, ed. Rose, V.. Berlin.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1907. De anima, ed. and trans. Hicks, R. D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1924. Metaphysics, ed. Ross, W. D.. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1936a. Physics, ed. Ross, W. D.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1936b. De caelo, ed. Allan, D. J.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1939. Aristoteles Latinus, vol. 1, ed. Lacombe, G., Birkenmajer, A., Dulong, M., and Franceschini, A.. Rome.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1947. Arisṭū ʿinda al-ʿarab. Dirāsāt wa-nuṣūṣ ghayr manshūra, ed. Badawī, A.. Cairo: Maktabat al-Nahḍa al-Miṣriyya.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1948. Manṭiq Arisṭū, vol. 1, ed. Badawī, A.. Cairo. [repr. Beirut: Dār al-Qalam, 1980]Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1949. Prior and Posterior Analytics, trans. Ross, W. D.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1953. Arisṭūṭālīs: Fann al-shiʿr, maʿa l-tarjama al-ʿarabiyya al-qadīma wa-shurūḥ al-Fārābī wa-Ibn Sīnā wa-Ibn Rushd, ed. Badawī, A.. Cairo: Maktabat al-Nahḍa al-Miṣriyya.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1954. Arisṭūṭālīs fī al-nafs, ed. Badawī, A.. Cairo: Maktabat al-Nahḍa al-Miṣriyya.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1955. Al-Aflāṭūniyya al-muḥdatha ʿinda al-ʿarab, ed. Badawī, A.. Cairo: Maktabat al-Nahḍa al-Miṣriyya. [2nd edn, Kuwait: Wikālat al-Maṭbūʿāt, 1977]Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1958. Aristotle, Magna Moralia (with Metaphysics x–xiv and Oeconomica), ed. and trans. Armstrong, G. Cyril. London.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1959a. Arisṭūṭālīs: al-Khiṭāba. al-tarjama al-ʿarabiyya al-qadīma, ed. Badawī, A.. Cairo: Maktabat al-Nahḍa al-Miṣriyya.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1959b. Aristotelis Rhetorica in versione arabica vetusta, ed. Badawī, A.. Cairo: Maktabat al-Nahḍa al-Miṣriyya.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1961a. Arisṭūṭālīs fī l-Samāʿ wa-al-āthār al-ʿulwiyya, ed. Badawī, A.. Cairo: Maktabat al-Nahḍa al-Miṣriyya.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1961b. Aristoteles Latinus i. 1–5, ed. Minio-Paluello, L.. Brussels/Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1964–1965. al-Ṭabīʿiyyāt. Tarjamat Isḥāq ibn Ḥunayn maʿa shurūḥ Ibn al-Samḥ wa-Ibn ʿAdī wa Mattā ibn Yūnus wa-Abī Faraj ibn al-Ṭayyib, 2 vols., ed. Badawī, A.. Cairo: al-Dār al-Qawmiyya li-l-Ṭibāʿa wa-l-Nashr.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1967. Kitāb Arisṭūṭālīs fī al-shiʿr, naql Abī Bishr Mattā ibn Yūnus al-Qunnāʾī min al-suryānī ilā l-ʿarabī, ed. Ayyād, S.. Cairo: Dār al-Kātib al-ʿArabī.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1970a. Aristoteles Latinus xxv.1–1^a, Metaphysica, lib. i–iv. 4. Translatio Iacobi sive Vetustissima cum scholiis et translatio composita sive Vetus, ed. Vuillemin-Diem, G.. Brussels/Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1970b. L’ Ethique a Nicomaque, 2 vols., ed. and trans. Gauthier, R. and Jolif, J.. Louvain-Paris.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1979. Al-Akhlāq, Ta’līf Aristūtālīs Tarjamat Isḥāq ibn Ḥunayn, ed. Badawī, A.. Kuwait: Wikālat al-Matbūʿāt.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1980. K. al-Maqūlāt. In Arisṭū, i–iii, ed. Badawī, A.. Beirut: Dār al-Qalam; Kuwait: Wikālat al-Matbūʿāt.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1984a. Arisṭūṭālīs. Al-Ṭabīʿa. Tarjama Isḥāq ibn Ḥunayn, vols. i–ii, ed. Badawī, A.. Cairo: al-Hayʾa al-Miṣriyya al-ʿĀmma li-al-Kitāb.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1984b. The Complete Works of Aristotle, ed. Barnes, J.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1984c. Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Apostle, H. G.. Grinnell, IA: Peripatetic Press.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1993. Aristotle, Posterior Analytics. 2nd edn, ed. and trans. Barnes, J.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1995. Aristotle, Poetics. Longinus, on the Sublime. Demetrius, on Style, ed. Halliwell, S.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 2002. Aristoteles. Rhetorik, trans. Rapp, C.. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 2012. Aristotle, Poetics. Editio Maior of the Greek Text with Historical Introductions and Philological Commentaries, ed. Tarán, L. and Gutas, D.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1562. Middle and Long Commentary on the Physics, in Aristotelis opera cum Averrois Commentariis, vol. iv, Venetiis apud Iunctas. [repr. Frankfurt am Main, 1962]Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1938–1952. Tafsīr mā baʿd al-ṭabīʿa, ed. Bouyges, M.. Beirut: Imprimerie Catholique.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1947. Kitāb al-āthār al-ʿulwiyya in Rasāʾil Ibn Rushd. Hyderabad: Dāʾirat al-Maʿārif al-ʿUthmāniyya.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1954. Tahafut al-Tahāfut (The Incoherence of the Incoherence), trans. Van den Bergh, S.. London: Luzac.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1971. Talḥīṣ kitāb Arisṭūṭālīs fī l-shiʿr, ed. Sālim, M.. Cairo: Lajnat Iḥyāʼ al-Turath al-Islāmī.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1977. Averroes’ Three Short Commentaries on Aristotle’s “Topics,” “Rhetoric,” and “Poetics,” ed. and trans. Butterworth, C.. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1983. Short Commentary on the Physics, kitāb al-Samāʿ al-ṭabīʿī (Epitome in physicorum libros), ed. Montada, J.. Madrid: Instituto Hispano-Arabe de Cultura.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1985. Averroes, Epitome de Anima, ed. Nogalez, S. Gomez. Madrid: Instituto Hispano-Arabe de Cultura.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1986. Talkhīṣ kitāb al-shiʿr. Corpus Commentariorum Averrois in Aristotelem, ed. Butterworth, C. and Harīdī, A.. Cairo: al-Hayʾa al-Miṣriyya al-ʿĀmma li-l-Kitāb.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1992. Tahāfut al-Tahāfut, ed. Bouyges, Maurice. Beirut: Dār al-Mashriq.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1994a. Middle Commentary on the Meteorology, Talkhīṣ al-āthār al-ʿulwiyya, ed. Alawi, J. A.. Beirut: Dār al-Gharb al-Islamī.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1994b. Risālat al-samāʻ al-ṭabīʻī, ed. Jihāmī, J. and Rafīq, ʻA.. Beirut: Raf Dār al-Fikr al-Lubnānī.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 1999. Talkhīṣ kitāb al-nafs, ed. Al-Ahwānī, . In Manshūrāt Maʿhad Tārīkh al-ʻUlūm al-ʻArabiyya wa-l-Islāmiyya Falsafa al-Islāmīyya, 59. Frankfurt: Institute for the History of Arabic-Islamic Science.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 2002a. Averroes’ Middle Commentary on Aristotle’s De Anima, ed. and trans. Ivry, A.. Provo: Brigham Young University Press.Google Scholar

Averroes, . 2002b. Commentaire moyen à la Rhétorique d’Aristote. 3 vols., ed. Aouad, M.. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1892. Al-Ishārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt, ed. Forget, J.. Leiden.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1910. al-Qaṣīda al-muzdawija fī l-manṭiq wa-Manṭiq al-Mashriqīyyīn, taṣnīf Abī ʻAlī ibn Sīnā. Cairo: al-Maktaba al-Salafiyya.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1945. Kitāb al-majmūʿ aw al-ḥikma al-ʿarūḍiyya fī maʿānī Kitāb Rīṭūrīqā, ed. Salīm, M.. Cairo: Maktabat al-Nahḍa al-Miṣriyya.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1947a. Sharḥ kitāb uthūlūjiyyā al-mansūb ilā Arisṭū li-Ibn Sīnā in Arisṭū ‘inda l-ʿarab. Dirāsāt wa-nuṣūṣ ġhayr manshūra, ed. Badawī, A.. Cairo: Maktabat al-Nahḍa al-Miṣriyya.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1947b. Al-Taʿlīqāt ʿalā ḥawāshī Kitāb al-Nafs li-Arisṭūṭālīs in Arisṭū ‘inda l-’Arab, ed. Badawī, A.. Cairo: Maktabat al-Nahḍa al-Miṣriyya.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1951. Livre des directives et remarques, trans. Goichon, A.-M.. Beirut/Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1954. Al-Shifāʾ. La Logique. 8. Rhétorique (al-Khaṭāba), ed. Sālim, M.. Cairo: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1956. Al-Shifāʾ: al-Burhān, ed. Affīfī, A. and Madkour, I.. Cairo: al-Maṭbaʿa l-Amīriyya.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1957–1960, 1971. Al-Ishārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt. 4 vols., ed. Dunyā, S.. Cairo: Dār al-Maʿārif.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1959. Al-Shifāʾ: al-Nafs, ed. Raḥmān, F.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1963. Livre des définitions, ed. and trans. Goichon, A. M.. Cairo: Publications de l’Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale du Caire.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1964. Al-Shifā’: al-Ṭabīʿiyyāt 5: al-Maʿādin wa-l-āthār al ʿulwiyya, ed. Muntaṣr, A., Zāyid, S., Ismaʿīl, A., and Madhkūr, I.. Cairo: al-Hayʾa al-ʿāmma li-Shuʾūn al-Maṭābiʿ al-Amiriyya.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1966. Al-Shifāʾ: al-manṭiq, 9: al-Shiʿr, ed. Sālim, M.. Cairo: al-Dār al-Miṣriyya lil-Taʾlīf wa-al-Tawzīʿ.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1969a. Kitāb al-Majmūʿ aw al-ḥikma al-ʿarūḍiyya fī maʿānī kitāb al-Shiʿr, ed. Sālim, M.. Cairo: Maṭbaʿat Dār al-Kutub.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1969b. Al-Risāla al-ḍḥawiyya fī l-maʿād, ed. Lucchetta, F.. Padua: Editrice Antenore.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1971. Avicenna’s Treatise on Logic: Part one of Danesh-Name Alai, ed. and trans. Zabeeh, F.. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1973. The Metaphysics of Avicenna: a critical translation-commentary and analysis of the fundamental arguments in Avicenna’s Metaphysica in the Dānish nāma-i ‘Alā’i (The Book of Scientific Knowledge), trans. Morewedge, P.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1983. Al-Shifā’: al-Ṭabīʿiyyāt 1: Al-Samāʿ al-ṭabīʿī, ed. Zāyid, S. and Madhkūr, I.. Cairo: Al-Hay’a al-Miṣriyya ʿĀmma lil-Kitāb.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1984. Remarks and Admonitions, Part I: Logic, ed. and trans. Inati, S.. Toronto.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1985. Kitāb al-Najāt, ed. Fakhry, M.. Beirut: Dār al-Āfāq al-Jadīda.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1992. Al-Mubāḥathāt, ed. Bīdārfar, M.. Qum: Intishārāt Baydār.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 1996. Kitāb ‘Uyūn al-ḥikma, ed. Jabr, M. and Jabr, M. F.. Damascus: Dār al-Yanābīʿ.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 2002. Al-Taʿlīqāt, ed. al-ʿUbaydī, H.. Baghdād: Bayt al-Ḥikma.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 2005. The Metaphysics of the Healing [Al-Shifā’: Al-Ilāhiyyāt], ed. and trans. Marmura, M.. Provo: Brigham Young University Press.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 2009. Physics of the Healing, ed. and trans. McGinnis, J.. Provo: Brigham Young University Press.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 2011. Avicenna’s Deliverance: Logic, trans. Ahmed, A.. Karachi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Avicenna, . 2014. Commentaire sur le livre Lambda de la Métaphysique d’Aristote (chapters 6–10), ed. and trans. Geoffroy, M., Janssens, J., and Sebti, M.. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Avicenna, N. D. Al-Shifāʾ: al-Maqūlāt, trans. Bäck, A. and ed. El-Khodeiri, . Münich: A. Philosophia Verlag. forthcoming.Google Scholar

Al-Baghdādī, . 1928. Uṣūl al-dīn. Istanbul.Google Scholar

Elias, . 1900. CIAG xviii. Eliae In Porphyrii Isagogen et Aristotelis Categorias Commentaria, ed. Busse, A.. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Euclid, . 1908. The Thirteen Books of the Elements, trans. and ed. Heath, T.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Al-Fārābī, . 1892. Alfārābīs Philosophische Abhandlungen, ed. Dieterici, F.. Leiden. [repr. Frankfurt am Main, 1999]Google Scholar

Al-Fārābī, . 1927. Al-Siyāsa al-madaniyya. Hyderabad.Google Scholar

Al-Fārābī, . 1949 [1953]. Kitāb Iḥṣā’ al-ʿulūm, ed. Palencia, A.. Madrid.Google Scholar

Al-Fārābī, . 1958–1959. “Al-Fārābī’s Paraphrase of the Categories of Aristotle,” ed. Dunlop, D. M.. Islamic Quarterly 4: 168–197; 5: 21–54.Google Scholar

Al-Fārābī, . 1959. “Kitāb al-Shiʿr li-Abī Naṣr al-Fārābī,” ed. Mahdī, M.. Shiʿr 3: 90–95.Google Scholar

Al-Fārābī, . 1961a. Falsafat Arisṭūṭālīs, ed. Mahdī, M.. Beirut: Dār Majallat Shiʿr.Google Scholar

Al-Fārābī, . 1961b. Fusūl al-madanī, ed. and trans. Dunlop, D. M.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Al-Fārābī, . 1962. Alfarabi’s Philosophy of Plato and Aristotle, Part I. The Attainment of Happiness, ed. and trans. Mahdī, M.. New York: Free Press of Glencoe. [rev. edn, Cornell University Press, 1969]Google Scholar

Al-Fārābī, . 1968. Kitāb al-Milla, ed. Mahdī, M.. Beirut: Imprimerie Catholique.Google Scholar

Al-Fārābī, . 1971. Deux ouvrages inédits sur la Réthorique, Didascalia in Rethoricam Aristotelis ex glosa Alpharabii, ed. Grignaschi, M. and Langhade, J.. Beirut: Dar el-Machreq.Google Scholar

Al-Fārābī, . 1976. Abū Naṣr al-Fārābī, Kitāb fī l-manṭiq: al-Khaṭāba, ed. Sālim, M.. Cairo: Maṭbaʿat Dār al-kutub.Google Scholar

Al-Fārābī, . 1981. Al-Farabi’s Commentary and Short Treatise on Aristotle’s De interpretatione, trans. Zimmerman, F. W.. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Al-Fārābī, . 1985a. Kitāb ārā’ ahl al-Madīna al-Fāḍila, ed. Nādir, A.. Beirut: Dār-al Mashriq.Google Scholar

Al-Fārābī, . 1985b. Mabādiʾ Ārāʾ ahl al-madīna al-Fāḍila, ed. and trans. Walzer, R.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Al-Fārābī, . 1986. Kitāb al-Alfāẓ al-mustaʿmala fī l-manṭiq, ed. Mahdī, M.. Beirut: Bibliothèque Orientale.Google Scholar

Al-Fārābī, . 1987–1989. Manṭiqiyyāt li-l-Fārābī, ed. Dānish Pazhūh, M. T.. Qum: Maktabat Āyat Allāh al-ʿUẓmā al-Marʿashī al-Najafī.Google Scholar

Al-Fārābī, . 1996. La città virtuosa, trans. Campanini, M.. Milan: Rizzoli.Google Scholar

Al-Fārābī, . 2001. Al-Fārābī, The Political Writings. Selected Aphorisms and Other Texts, ed. and trans. Butterworth, C.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Al-Fārābī, . 2008. L’armonia delle opinioni dei due sapienti, il divino Platone e Aristotele, trans. Bonadeo, C. Martini. Pisa: Plus.Google Scholar

Al-Fārābī, . forthcoming. Al-Fārābī, Book of Letters, ed. and trans. Butterworth, C..Google Scholar

Al-Ghazālī, . 2002. The Incoherence of the Philosophers, ed. and trans. Marmura, M.. Provo: Brigham Young University Press.Google Scholar

Hume, D. 1978. A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Uṣaybiʿa, Ibn Abī. 1884. ʿUyūn al-anbā’ fi-ṭabaqāt al-aṭibbā’, 2 vols., ed. Muller, A. Königsberg.Google Scholar

Ibn ʿAdī, Yaḥyā. 1988. Maqālāt Yaḥyā ibn ʿAdī al-falsafiyya, ed. Khalīfāt, S.. Amman: Manshūrāt al-Jāmiʿa al-Urduniyya.Google Scholar

Ibn, Bājja. 1968. Rasāʾil Ibn Bājja al-iIāhīyya (Opera Metaphysica), ed. Fakhry, M.. Beirut: Dār al-Nahār.Google Scholar

Ibn, Bājja. 1969. Tadbīr al-mutawaḥḥid, ed. Ziyāda, M.. Montreal: McGill University Press.Google Scholar

Bājja, Ibn. 1978. Shurūḥāt al-Samāʿ al-ṭabīʿī, ed. Ziyāda, M.. Beirut: Dār al-Kindī.Google Scholar

al-Biṭrīq, Ibn. 1967. Meteorology, The Arabic Version of Aristotle’s Meteorology, ed. Petraitis, C.. Beirut: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī.Google Scholar

Fūrak, Ibn. 1999. Kitāb al-Ḥudūd fī l-uṣūl, ed. al-Sulaymānī, M.. Beirut: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī.Google Scholar

al-Muqaffaʿ, Ibn. 1978. al-Manṭiq, ed. Pazhūh, M. T. Dānish. Tehran: Anjuman-i Shāhanshāhī Falsafah-i Tihrān.Google Scholar

al-Nadīm, Ibn. 1871–1872. Kitāb al-Fihrist, 2 vols., ed. Flügel, G.. Leipzig.Google Scholar

al-Nadīm, Ibn. 1970. The Fihrist, A Tenth-Century Survey of Muslim Culture, trans. Dodge, B.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

al-Nadīm, Ibn. 1971–1973. Kitāb al-Fihrist, ed. Tajaddud, R.. Tehran: Marvi Offset.Google Scholar

Ṣāʿid, Ibn. 1912. Ṭabaqāt al-umam, ed. Cheikho, L.. Beirut.Google Scholar

Ṣāʿid, Ibn. 1935. Livre des catégories des nations (ṭabaqāt al-umam), trans. Blachère, R.. Paris.Google Scholar

Ṭufayl, Ibn. 1708. Philosophus Autodidactus or Ḥay ibn Yaqẓān, trans. Ockley, S.. London. [repr. Cairo, 1905]Google Scholar

al-Ṣafāʾ, Ikhwān. 2013. On the Natural Sciences. Epistles 15–21, ed. and trans. Baffioni, C.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1929. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Smith, N. K.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Al-Kātibī, Najm al-Dīn. 1948. al-Risāla al-shamsiyya, ed. ʿAlī, A. S.. Cairo: Ḥalabī and Sons.Google Scholar

Al-Kindī, 1950–1953. Rasā’il al-Kindī al-falsafiyya, ed. Abū Rīda, M. A.. Cairo: Dār al-Fikr al-ʿArabī.Google Scholar

Al-Kindī, 1974. Al-Kindi’s Metaphysics. A Translation of Yaʿqūb ibn Isḥāq al-Kindī’s Treatise on First Philosophy (fī al-Falsafah al-ūlā), trans. Ivry, A.. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Al-Kindī, 1982. “Al-Kindī’s On Definitions and Descriptions of Things.” ed. and trans. Klein-Franke, F.. Le Muséon 95: 191–216.Google Scholar

Miskawayh, . 1966. Tahdhīb al-akhlāq, ed. Zuraiq, Q.. Beirut: American University.Google Scholar

Maimonides, M. 1856–1866. Dalālat al-hāʾirīn, 3 vols., ed. Munk, S.. Paris.Google Scholar

Maimonides, . 1963. The Guide of the Perplexed, trans. Pines, S.. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Marinus, . 1925. Life of Proclus, trans. Guthrie, K.S.. Yonkers: Platonist Press.Google Scholar

Marinus, . 2001. Proclus ou sur le bonheur, ed. Saffrey, H. D., Segonds, A., and Luna, C.. Paris: Les belles lettres.Google Scholar

Olympiodorus, . 1902. Olympiodori Prolegomena et in Categorias Commentarium. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Philoponus, . 1887–1888. In Aristotelis Physicorum Octo Libros Commentaria. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Philoponus, . 1897. In Aristotelis De anima libros commentaria, ed. Hayduck, M.. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Philoponus, . 1909. Philoponi in Analytica Posteriora cum anonymo in librum ii, ed. Wallies, M., vol. xiii. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Philoponus, . 1967. Johannes Philoponos. Ausgewählte Schriften, ed. Böhm, W.. München: Schönigh.Google Scholar

Philoponus, . 1987. Contra Aristotelem, on the Eternity of the World against Aristotle (De aeternitate mundi contra Aristotelem), ed. Wildberg, C.. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Philoponus, . 1991. Corollaries on Place and Void with Simplicius: Against Philoponus on the Eternity of the World, trans. Furley, D. and Wildberg, C.. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Philoponus, . 1993. On Aristotle’s Physics 2, trans. Lacey, A. R.. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Philoponus, . 2009. On Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics 2, trans. Goldin, O.. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Plotinus, . 1951–1973. Plotini Opera, ed. Henry, P. and Schwyzer, H. R., 3 vols. Paris/Louvain: Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar

Porphyry, . 1993. Porphyrii philosophi fragmenta, ed. Smith, A., fragmenta arabica, D. Wasserstein interpretante. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Priscian of Lydia. 1997. Priscian: On Theophrastus on Sense-Perception, trans. Huby, P. with Simplicius’ On Aristotle on The Soul 2.5–12, trans. Steel, C.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Proclus, . 1903–1906. In Platonis Timaeum commentaria, 3 vols., ed. Diehl, E.. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Pseudo-Aristotle. 1966. Aflūṭīn ‘inda al-ʿarab. Plotinus apud Arabes. Theologia Aristotelis et fragmenta quae supersunt, ed. Badawī, A.. Cairo: Maktabat al-Nahḍa al-Miṣriyya.Google Scholar

Pseudo-Olympiodorus. 1971. “Tafsr Alimfidurus li-kitāb Arisṭūṭālīs fi al-āthār al-ʿulwiyya tarjamat Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāq.” In Commentaires sur Aristote perdus en grec et autres épîtres, ed. Badawī, A.. Beirut: Dār al-Mashriq.Google Scholar

Al-Qifṭī, . 1903. Tārīkh al-ḥukamāʾ, ed. Lippert, J.. Leipzig: Dieterich’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar

Al-Rāzī, Abū Bakr. 1939. Rasāʾil falsafiyya maʿa qiṭaʿ baqiyat min kutubihi l-mafqūda, ed. Kraus, P.. Cairo: Maṭbaʿat Būl Bārbīh.Google Scholar

Al-Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn. 1966. Kitāb al-mabāḥith al-mashriqiyya fī ʿilm al-ilāhiyyāt wa-l-ṭabīʿiyyat, vol. ii. Tehran.Google Scholar

Al-Sijistānī, 1969a. al-Qawl fī l-kamāl al-khāṣṣ bi-nawʿ al-insān. In “Le traité inédit de Sijistānī sur la perfection humaine,” ed. Kügel-Türker, M.. Pensamiento 25: 207–223.Google Scholar

Al-Sijistānī, 1969b. Kalām fī mabādiʾ al-mawjūdāt. In “Une traité sur les principes des êtres attribué a Abū Sulaymān al-Sijistānī,”ed. Troupeau, G.. Pensamiento 25: 259–270.Google Scholar

Al-Sijistānī, 1974a. al-Maqāla fī anna l-ajrām al-ʿulwiyya dhawāt anfus nāṭiqa. In Muntakhab Ṣiwān al-ḥikma wa-thalāth rasāʾil, ed. Badawī, A., 367–371. Tehran: Intishārāt-i Bunyād-i Farhang-i Īrān.Google Scholar

Al-Sijistānī, 1974b. al-Maqāla fī l-kamāl al-khāṣṣ bi-nawʿ al-insān. In Muntakhab Ṣiwān al-ḥikma wa-thalāth rasāʾil, ed. Badawī, A., 377–87. Tehran: Intishārāt-i Bunyād-i Farhang-i Īrān.Google Scholar

Al-Sijistānī, 1974c. al-Maqāla fī l-muḥarrik al-awwal. In Muntakhab Ṣiwān al-ḥikma wa-thalāth rasāʾil, ed. Badawī, A., 372–376. Tehran: Intishārāt-i Bunyād-i Farhang-i Īrān.Google Scholar

Al-Sijistānī, 1979. Muntakhab Ṣiwān al-ḥikma. ed. Dunlop, D. M.. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Simplicius, . 1882. In Aristotelis Physicorum libros quattuor priores commentaria, ed. Diels, H.. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Simplicius, . 1894. In Aristotelis De caelo commentaria, ed. Heiberg, J. L.. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Simplicius, . 1895. In Aristotelis Physicorum libros quattuor posteriores commentaria, ed. Diels, H.. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Simplicius, . 1997. On Aristotle’s Physics 2, trans. Fleet, B.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Simplicius, . 2003. On Aristotle’s Categories 1–4, trans. Chase, M.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Sophocles, . 1994. Antigone. The Women of Trachis. Philoctetes. Oedipus et Colonus, trans. Lloyd-Jones, H.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Al-Tawḥīdī, Abū Ḥayyān. 1992. Al-Muqābasāt, ed. Sandūbī, H.. Kuwait: Dār Suʻād al-Ṣabbāḥ.Google Scholar

Themistius, . 1900. In Aristotelis Physica paraphrasis, ed. Schenkl, H.. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Al-Ṭūsī, . 1971. “Sharḥ al-Ishārāt.” In Avicenna 1971.Google Scholar

Abattouy, M., Renn, J., and Weinig, P. eds. 2001. “Transmission as Transformation: The Translation Movements in the Medieval East and West in a Comparative Perspective.” Science in Context, 14: 1–12.Google Scholar

Adamson, P. 2007a. Al-Kindī. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Adamson, P. 2007b. “The Kindian Tradition: the Structure of Philosophy in Arabic Neoplatonism.” In D’Ancona 2007: 351–370.Google Scholar

Adamson, P. 2012a. “Avicenna and his Commentators on Human and Divine Self-Intellection.” In The Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna’s Metaphysics, ed. Hasse, D. and Bertolacci, A., 97–122. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Adamson, P. 2012b. “Abū Bakr al-Rāzī on Animals.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 94: 249–73.Google Scholar

Adamson, P. and Pormann, P.. 2012c. The Philosophical Works of al-Kindi. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Afnan, S. M. 1947. “The Commentary of Avicenna on Aristotle’s Poetics.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society: 188–190.Google Scholar

Akasoy, A. 2013. “The Arabic and Islamic Reception of the Nicomachean Ethics.” In The Reception of Aristotle’s Ethics, ed. Miller, J., 85–106. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Akasoy, A. and Dunlop, D. M., trans., and Fidora, A. eds., 2005. The Arabic Version of the Nicomachean Ethics. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Alemparte, J. F. 1983. “Hermann el alemán, traductor del siglo xiii en Toledo.” Hispania Sacra 35:9–56.Google Scholar

Alwishah, A. 2006. “Avicenna’s philosophy of mind.” UCLA Dissertation.Google Scholar

Anawati, G. C. 1957. “La Ḥikma ʿarūḍiyya d’Ibn Sīnā.” In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Congress of Orientalists, ed. Togan, Z. V., 171–176. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Aouad, M. 1989a. “Le De pomo.” In Goulet, 1989: 537–541.Google Scholar

Aouad, M. 1989b. “Aristote. La Rhétorique. Tradition syriaque et arabe.” In Goulet, 1989: 455–472. [repr. in Goulet 2003: 210–223]Google Scholar

Aouad, M. 1989c. “La Théologie d’Aristote et autres textes du Plotinus Arabus.” In Goulet, 1989: 541–590.Google Scholar

Aouad, M. 1992. “Les fondements de la Rhétorique d’Aristote reconsidérés par al-Fārābī ou le concept de point de vue immédiat et commun.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 2: 133–180.Google Scholar

Aouad, M. 1993. “[review] R. Würsch, Avicennas Bearbeitungen der aristotelischen Rhetorik.” Bulletin critique des Annales islamologiques 10: 106–121.Google Scholar

Aouad, M. 1994. “Les fondements de la Rhétorique d’Aristote reconsidérés par Averroès dans l’abrégé de la rhétorique, ou le développement du concept de ‘point de vue immédiat.’” In Peripatetic Rhetoric after Aristotle, ed. Fortenbaugh, W. and Mirhady, D., 261–313. London: Transaction.Google Scholar

Aouad, M. 1997a. “La doctrine d’Ibn Ridwān et la Didascalia in Rethoricam Aristotelis ex glosa Alpharabii.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 7: 163–245.Google Scholar

Aouad, M. 1998a. “Le texte arabe du chapitre sur la rhétorique d’Ibn Riḍwān et ses correspondants dans la Didascalia in Rhetoricam Aristotelis ex glosa Alpharabii: fragments du Grand Commentaire a la Rhétorique d’al-Fārābī.” In La Rhétorique d’Aristote. Traditions et commentaires de l’antiquité au xviie siècle, ed. Dahan, G. and Rosier-Catach, I., 169–225. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Aouad, M. 1998b. “La doctrine rhétorique d’Ibn Riḍwān et la Didascalia in Rhetoricam Aristotelis ex glosa Alpharabii [part 2].” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 8: 131–160.Google Scholar

Aouad, M. 2006. Le Livre de la Rhétorique du philosophe et médecine Ibn Ṭumlūs (Alhagiag bin Thalmus). Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Aouad, M. 2007. “Rhétorique aristotélicienne (rethorica) et faculté oratoire (oratoria/balāgha) selon les Didascalia in ‘Rethoricam’ (sic!) Aristotelis ex glosa Alpharabii.” In Classical Arabic Humanities in Their Own Terms: Festschrift for Wolfhart Heinrichs on his 65th birthday presented by his students and colleagues, ed. Gruendler, B., 40–61. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Aouad, M. 2008. “Les lois selon les Didascalia in Rhetoricam [sic] Aristotelis ex glosa Alpharabii.“ Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph 61: 453–470.Google Scholar

Aouad, M. 2009. “Al-Fārābī critique des traditions non aristotéliciennes de la rhétorique.” In Literary and Philosophical Rhetoric in the Greek, Roman, Syriac, and Arabic Worlds, ed. Woerther, F., 155–183. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar

Aouad, M. and Rashed, M.. 1997b. “L’exégèse de la Rhétorique d’Aristote: Recherches sur quelques commentateurs grecs, arabes et byzantins. Première partie.” Medioevo 23: 43–189.Google Scholar

Aouad, M. and Schoeler, G. 2002. “Le syllogisme poétique selon al-Fārābī: un syllogisme incorrect de la deuxième figure.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 12: 185–196.Google Scholar

Arberry, A. 1938. “Fārābī’s Canons of Poetry.” Rivista degli Studi Orientali 17: 266–278.Google Scholar

Arnzen, R. 1998. Aristoteles’ De Anima. Eine verlorene spätantike Paraphrase in arabischer und persischer Überlieferung. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Arnzen, R. 2003. “De Anima: Paraphrase arabe anonyme.” In Goulet, 2003: 359–365.Google Scholar

Atiyeh, G. N. 1966. Al-Kindī: the Philosopher of the Arabs. Rawalpindi: Islamic Research Institute.Google Scholar

Badawī, A. 1954. al-Uṣūl al-yūnāniyya li-l-naẓariyyāt al-siyāsiyya fī l-Islām. Cairo: Maktabat al-Nahḍa al-Miṣriyya.Google Scholar

Badawī, A. 1979–1980. “[review] Ch. Butterworth, Averroës’ Three Short Commentaries on Aristotle’s ‘Topics,’ ‘Rhetoric,’ and ‘Poetics.’” In Revista del Instituto egipcio de estudios islámicos en Madrid 20: 183–186.Google Scholar

Balty-Guesdon, M. G. 1992. “Le Bayt al-Ḥikma.” Arabica 39: 131–150.Google Scholar

Baracchi, C. 2008. Aristotle’s Ethics as First Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bardenhewer, O. 1882. Die pseudo-aristotelische Schrift ueber das reine Gute bekannt unter dem Namen Liber de causis. Freiburg im Breisgau. [repr. Frankfurt am Main, 1961]Google Scholar

Baumstark, A. 1900. Aristoteles bei den Syrern vom 5. bis 8. Jahrhundert. Syrische Texte, herausgegeben, übersetzt und untersucht. 1. (einziger) Band. Syrisch–arabische Biographien des Aristoteles. Syrische Kommentare zur ΕΙΣΑΓΩΓΗ des Porphyrios. Leipzig. [repr. Aaelen: Scientia Verlag, 1975]Google Scholar

Bergsträsser, G. 1913. Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāḳ und seine Schule: Sprach- und literargeschichtliche Untersuchungen zu den arabischen Hippokrates- und Galen-Übersetzungen. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Bergsträsser, G. 1925. “Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāq über die syrischen und arabischen Galen-Übersetzungen, zum ersten Mal herausgegeben und übersetzt.” Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 17, 2. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar

Bergsträsser, G. 1932. “Neue Materialen zu Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāqs Galen-Bibliographie.” Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes, 19, 2. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar

Berman, L. V. 1978. “Ibn Rushd’s Middle Commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics in Medieval Hebrew Literature.” In Multiple Averroès: Actes du Colloque International organise à l’occasion du 850e anniversaire de la naissance d’Averroès, Paris, September 20–23, 1976, ed. Jolivet, J., 287–321. Paris.Google Scholar

Berman, L. V. 1999. Averroes’ Middle Commentary on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics in the Hebrew Version of Samuel ben Judah. Jerusalem.Google Scholar

Berti, E. 1997. La philosophia del “primo”Aristotele. Milan.Google Scholar

Berti, V. 2009. Vita e studi di Timoteo i, patriarca cristiano di Baghdad. Ricerche sull’epistolario e sulle fonti contigue. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar

Bertolacci, A. 2006. The Reception of Aristotle’s Metaphysics in Avicenna’s Kitāb al-Šifāʾ. A Milestone of Western Metaphysical Thought. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Black, D. 1990. Logic and Aristotle’s “Rhetoric” and “Poetics” in Medieval Arabic Philosophy. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Black, D. 1993. “Estimation in Avicenna: The Logical and Psychological Dimensions.” Dialogue 32: 219–258.Google Scholar

Black, D. 2006. “Knowledge (ʿilm) and Certitude (yaqīn) in Al-Fārābī’s Epistemology.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 16: 11–45.Google Scholar

Black, D. 2008. “Avicenna on Self-Awareness and Knowing that One Knows.” In The Unity of Science in the Arabic Tradition, ed. Rahman, S., Hassan, T., and Street, T., 63–87. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Boggess, W. F. 1965. “Averrois Cordubensis Commentarium Medium in Aristotelis Poetriam.” University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Dissertation.Google Scholar

Boggess, W. F. 1970. “Alfarabi and the Rhetoric: The Cave Revisited.” Phronesis 15: 89–90.Google Scholar

Bonadeo, C. M. 2002. “La tradizione araba della Met afisica di Aristotele. Libri α-A.” In Aristotele e Alessandro di Afrodisia nella tradizione araba, ed. D’Ancona, C. and Serra, G., 75–112. Padova: Il Poligrafo.Google Scholar

Bonadeo, C. M. 2003. “La Métaphysique. Tradition syriaque et arabe. Mise à jour bibliographique.” In Goulet, 2003: 259–264.Google Scholar

Bonadeo, C. M. 2013. ʿAbd al-Laṭīf al-Baghdādī’s Philosophical Journey. From Aristotle’s Metaphysics to the “metaphysical science.” Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Bonebakker, S. A. 1970. “Aspects of the History of Literary Rhetoric and Poetics in Arabic Literature.” Viator 1: 75–95.Google Scholar

Boojamra, J. L. 1997. “Christianity in Greater Syria: Surrender and Survival.” Byzantion 67: 148–178.Google Scholar

Borges, J. L. 2000. Labyrinths. Selected Stories and Other Writings. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Broadie, S. 1982. Nature, Change, and Agency in Aristotle’s Physics. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Brock, S. 1982. “From Antagonism to Assimilation: Syriac attitudes to Greek Learning.” In East of Byzantium: Syria and Armenia in the Formative Period, ed. Garsoïan, N., Mathews, T., and Thompson, R., 17–34. Washington: Dumbarton Oaks.Google Scholar

Brock, S. 1991. “The Syriac Background to Ḥunayn’s Translation Techniques.” Aram 3: 139–162.Google Scholar

Brock, S. 1993. “The Syriac Commentary Tradition.” In Glosses and Commentaries on Aristotelian Logical Texts. The Syriac, Arabic and Medieval Latin Traditions, ed. Burnett, C., 3–18. London: Warburg Institute.Google Scholar

Brock, S. 1999. “Two Letters of the Patriarch Timothy from the Late Eighth Century on Translations from Greek.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 9: 233–246.Google Scholar

Brock, S. 2003. “Syriac Translations of Greek Popular Philosophy.” In Von Athen nach Bagdad. Zur Rezeption griechischer Philosophie von der Spätantike bis zum Islam, ed. Bruns, P., 9–28. Bonn: Borengässer.Google Scholar

Brock, S. 2014. “The Syriac Abbreviated Version of Ps.-Aristotle, On Virtues and Vices.” In Études de logique et de cosmologie offertes à Henri Hugonnard-Roche, ed. Coda, E. and Bonadeo, C. Martini. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Brown, H. V. B. 1972. “Avicenna and the Christian Philosophers in Baghdād.” In Islamic Philosophy and the Classical Tradition, ed. Stern, S. M., Hourani, A., and Brown, V., 35–49. London: Cassirer.Google Scholar

Brugman, J. and Drossart Lulofs, H., eds. 1971. Aristotle. Generation of the Animals. The Arabic translation commonly ascribed to yaḥyā ibn al-Biṭrīq. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Burnett, C. 2001. “The Coherence of the Arabic–Latin Translation Program in Toledo in the Twelfth Century.” Science in Context 14: 249–288.Google Scholar

Burnett, C. 2005. “Arabic into Latin: The Reception of Arabic Philosophy into Western Europe.” In The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy, ed. Adamson, P. and Taylor, R. C., 370–404. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. 1996. “Enthymeme: Aristotle on the Rationality of Rhetoric.” In Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric, ed. Rorty, A. O., 88–115. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Cacouros, M. 2003. “Le traité pseudo-aristotélicien De virtutibus et vitiis.” In Goulet, 2003: 506–546.Google Scholar

Cantarino, V. 1971. “Averroes on Poetry.” In Islam and its Cultural Divergence. Studies in Honor of Gustave E. von Grunebaum, ed. Tikku, G. L., 10–26. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Cantarino, V. 1975. Arabic Poetics in the Golden Age. Selection of Texts Accompanied by a Preliminary Study. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Ciancaglini, C. A. 1998. “Gli antecedenti del Romanzo siriaco di Alessandro.” In La diffusione dell’eredità classica nell’età tardoantica e medievale. Il ‘Romanzo di Alessandro’ ed altri scritti, ed. Finazzi, R. B. and Valvo, A., 55–93. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar

Coda, E. 2012. “Alexander of Aphrodisias in Themistius’ Paraphrase of the De Caelo.” Studia graeco-arabica 2: 355–371.Google Scholar

Coda, E. 2014. “Reconstructing the text of Themistius’ Paraphrase on the De Caelo. The Hebrew and Latin Versions on the Three Meanings of the Term ‘Heaven.’” Studia graeco-arabica 4: 1–15.Google Scholar

Conrad, L. I. 1999. “Varietas syriaca. Secular and Scientific Culture in the Christian Communities of Syria after the Arab Conquest.” In After Bardaisan. Studies on Continuity and Change in Syriac Christianity in Honour of Professor Han J. W. Drijvers, ed. Reinink, G. J. and Klugkist, A. C., 85–105. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar

Cooperson, M. 2005. Al-Maʾmūn. Oxford: Oneworld.Google Scholar

Corbin, H. 1964. Histoire de la philosophie islamique. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Corbin, H. 1979. Corps spirituel et Terre céleste: de L’Iran mazdéen à l’Iran shî‘ite. Paris: Buchet/Chastel.Google Scholar

Crone, P. and Hinds, M. 1986. God’s Caliph. Religious Authority in the First Centuries of Islam. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dahiyat, I. M. 1974. Avicenna’s Commentary on the Poetics of Aristotle. A Critical Study with an Annotated Translation of the Text. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Daiber, H., ed., 1980. Aetius Arabus. Die Vorsokratiker in arabischer Überlieferung. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar

Daiber, H. 1997. “Salient trends of the Arabic Aristotle.” In The Ancient Tradition in Christian and Islamic Hellenism. Studies on the Transmission of Greek Philosophy and Sciences Dedicated to H. J. Drossaart Lulofs on His Ninetieth Birthday, ed. Endress, G. and Kruk, R., 29–41. Leiden: CNWS.Google Scholar

Daiber, H. 2001. “Die Aristotelesrezeption in der syrischen Literatur.” In Die Gegenwart des Altertums. Formen und Funktionen des Altertumsbezugs in den Hochkulturen der Alten Welt, ed. Kuhn, D. and Stahl, H., 327–345. Heidelberg: Forum.Google Scholar

D’Ancona, C. 2001. “Pseudo-Theology of Aristotle. Chapter I: Structure and Composition.” Oriens 36: 78–112.Google Scholar

D’Ancona, C. 2006. “The Topic of the ‘Harmony between Plato and Aristotle’: Some Examples in Early Arabic Philosophy.” In Wissen über Grenzen, Arabisches Wissen und lateinisches Mittelalter, ed. Speer, A. and Wegener, L., 379–405. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

D’Ancona, C. ed. 2007. The Libraries of the Neoplatonists. Proceedings of the Meeting of the European Science Foundation Network “Late Antiquity and Arabic Thought. Patterns in the Constitution of European Culture,” Strasbourg, March 12–14, 2004. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

D’Ancona, C. 2008. “Aristotle and Aristotelianism.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam 3, ed. Fleet, K., Krämer, G., Matringe, D., Nawas, J., and Rowson, E. at http://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-3/aristotle-and-aristotelianism-COM_0170Google Scholar

D’Ancona, C. 2009. “Greek Sources in Arabic and Islamic Philosophy.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Valta, E. at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/arabic-islamic-greekGoogle Scholar

D’Ancona, C. 2010. “The Origins of Islamic Philosophy.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, ed. Gerson, L., 869–893. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

D’Ancona, C. 2011. “La Teologia neoplatonica di ‘Aristotele’ e gli inizi della filosofia arabo-musulmana.” In Entre Orient et Occident. La philosophie et la science gréco-romaines dans le monde arabe, 57e Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique, Fondation Hardt, ed. Goulet, R. and Rudolph, U., 135–190. Geneva: Vandoeuvres.Google Scholar

D’Ancona, C. 2012. “Le traduzioni in latino e in arabo. Continuità e trasformazioni della tradizione filosofie greca fra tarda antichità e Medioevo.” Atti del xii Congresso Internazionale di Filosofia Medievale, Palermo 2007. In Universalità della ragione. Pluralità delle filosofie nel Medieovo, ed. Musco, A., Gambino, R., Peppi, L., Spallino, P., Vasilio, M., 73–104. Palermo.Google Scholar

Dapía, Silvia G. 1999. “The Myth of the Framework in Borges’s ‘Averroes’ Search.’” Variaciones Borges 7: 147–165.Google Scholar

Davidson, H. 1992. Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes on Intellect. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Degen, R. 1981. “Galen im Syrischen: eine Übersicht über die syrische Überlieferung der Werke Galens.” In Galen. Problems and Prospects, ed. Nutton, V., 131–166. London.Google Scholar

De Herven, V. N. D. “How nothing can be something: the Stoic theory of void,” unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

De Konick, T. 1994. “Aristotle on God as Thought Thinking Itself.” Review of Metaphysics 47 (3): 471–515.Google Scholar

De Libera, A. 1997. “Structure du corpus scolaire de la métaphysique dans la première moitié du xiiie siècle.” In L’enseignement de la philosophie au xiiie siècle, Autour du “Guide de l’étudiant” du ms. Ripoll 109, ed. Lafleur, C. and Carrier, J., 61–88. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar

De Martino, C. 2003. “Parva Naturalia. Tradition arabe.” In Goulet, 2003: 375–378.Google Scholar

De Matteis, M. C. 2005. “Aristotele.” In Enciclopedia Dantesca, vol. 5, 573–581. Milano: Instituto della Enciclopedia Italiana, Biblioteca Trecanni.Google Scholar

Di Branco, M. 2009. Storie Arabe di Greci e di Romani. Pisa: Plus.Google Scholar

Di Branco, M. 2012. “Un’istituzione sasanide? Il Bayt al-ḥikma e il movimento di traduzione.” Studia graeco-arabica 2: 255–263.Google Scholar

Dolapönü, P. Y. ed., 1953. Egratheh d-Dawid bar Paulos. Mardin.Google Scholar

Druart, T. “Al-Fārābī’s Metaphysics.” In Encyclopedia Iranica, ed. Yarshatar, E. at http://iranicaonline.org/articles/farabi-iiiGoogle Scholar

Dunlop, D. M. 1959. “The translations of al-Biṭrīq and Yaḥyā (Yuḥannā) b. al-Biṭrīq.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 91 (3–4): 140–150.Google Scholar

Dunlop, D.M. trans., Akasoy, A. and Fidora, A. eds., 2005. The Arabic Version of the Nicomachean Ethics. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Eichner, H. 2010. “Al-Fārābī and Ibn Sīnā on ‘Universal Science’ and the System of the Sciences: Evidence of the Arabic Tradition of the Posterior Analytics.” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 21: 71–95.Google Scholar

Elamrani-Jamal, A. 2003. “De Anima. Tradition arabe.” In Goulet, 2003: 346–358.Google Scholar

Endress, G. 1966. “Die arabischen Übersetzungen von Aristoteles’ Schrift De Caelo,” inaugural dissertation, Bildstelle der J. W. Goethe Universität, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar

Endress, G. 1973. Proclus Arabus. Zwanzig Abschnitte aus der Institutio Theologica in arabischer Übersetzung. Wiesbaden: Imprimerie Catholique.Google Scholar

Endress, G. 1974. “[review] Petraitis, C. ed., The Arabic Version of Aristotle’s Meteorology. A Critical Edition with an Introduction and Greek–Arabic Glossaries.” Oriens 23–24: 497–509.Google Scholar

Endress, G. 1977. The Works of Yaḥyā ibn ‘Adī. An analytical inventory. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar

Endress, G. 1986. “Grammatik und Logik: Arabische Philologie und griechische Philosophie im Widerstreit.” In Sprachphilosophie in Antike und Mittelalter: Bochumer Kolloquium 2–4 Juni 1982, ed. Mojsisch, B., 163–299. Amsterdam: B. R. Grüner.Google Scholar

Endress, G. 1987. “Die wissenschaftliche Literatur.” In Grundriss der Arabischen Philologie ii. Literaturwissenschaft ed. Gätje, H., 400–530. Wiesbaden: Reichert. [repr. ii. SUPPLEMENT, ed. Fischer, W., 103–145, 1992]Google Scholar

Endress, G. 1991a. “Der erste Lehrer. Der arabische Aristoteles und das Konzept der Philosophie im Islam.” In Gottes ist der Orient. Gottes ist der Okzident. Festschrift für A. Falaturi, ed. Tworuschka, U., 151–181. Köln: Böhlau Verlag.Google Scholar

Endress, G. 1991b. “La ‘Concordance entre Platon et Aristote,’ l’Aristote arabe et l’émancipation de la philosophie en Islam medieval.” In Historia Philosophiae Medii Aevi. Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters, ed. Mojsisch, B. and Pluta, O., 237–257. Amsterdam: Grüner.Google Scholar

Endress, G. 1995. “Averroes’ De caelo. Ibn Rushd’s Cosmology in His Commentaries on Aristotle’s On the Heavens.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 5: 9–49.Google Scholar

Endress, G. 1997a. “L’Aristote Arabe. Réception, autorité et transformation du Premier Maître.” Medioevo 23: 1–42.Google Scholar

Endress, G. 1997b. “The Circle of al-Kindī: Early Arabic Translations and the Rise of Islamic Philosophy.” In The Ancient Tradition in Christian and Islamic Hellenism: Studies in the Transmission of Greek Philosophy and Sciences, ed. Endress, G. and Kruk, R., 43–76. Leiden: CNWS.Google Scholar

Endress, G. and Kruk, R. eds. 1997c. The Ancient Tradition in Christian and Islamic Hellenism: Studies in the Transmission of Greek Philosophy and Sciences. Leiden: CNWS.Google Scholar

Endress, G. 2007. “Building the Library of Arabic Philosophy. Platonism and Aristotelianism in the Sources of al-Kindī.” In D’Ancona 2007: 319–350.Google Scholar

Fakhry, M. 1987. A History of Islamic Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Fazzo, S. and Zonta, M. 2014. “Towards a Textual History and Reconstruction of Alexander of Aphrodisias’s Treatise On the Principles of the Universe.” Journal of Semitic Studies 59: 91–116.Google Scholar

Ferrari, G. 2005. “La scuola aristotelica di Bagdad.” In Storia della filosofia nell’Islam medievale, vol. 1, ed. D’Ancona, C., 352–379. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar

Fiori, E. 2011. “Translations from Greek into Syriac.” In Encyclopaedia of Medieval Philosophy. Philosophy between 500 and 1500, ed. Lagerlund, H., 1333–1335. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Fowden, G. 2004. Quṣayr ‘Amra: Art and the Umayyad Elite in Late Antique Syria. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Fowden, G. 2008. “Pseudo-Aristotelian Politics and Theology in Universal Islam.” In Ancient Greece and Ancient Iran. Cross-Cultural Encounters, 1st International Conference, Athens, November 11–13, 2006, ed. Darbandi, S. M. R. and Zournatzi, A., 65–81. Athens: National Hellenic Research Foundation.Google Scholar

Frank, R. 1967. “Al-Maʿnā: Some Reflections on the Technical Meanings of the Term in the Kalām and Its Use in the Physics of Muʿammar.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 87: 248–259.Google Scholar

Frank, R. 1984. “Bodies and Atoms: The Ashʾarite Analysis.” In Islamic Theology and Philosophy, ed. Marmura, M.,39–53. Albany: State University Press.Google Scholar

Frede, M. 1987a. “The Unity of General and Special Metaphysics: Aristotle’s Conception of Metaphysics.” In Essays in Ancient Philosophy, ed. Frede, M., 81–95. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Frede, M. 1987b. “The Original Notion of Cause.” In Essays in Ancient Philosophy, ed. Frede, M., 125–150. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Fritsche, J. 2010. “Aristotle’s Usage of ἀρχὴ κινήσεως (‘principle of motion’) and the Two Definitions of Nature in Physics ii, 1.” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 52: 7–31.Google Scholar

Furlani, G. 1923. “Il trattato di Sergio di Rêsh’aynâ sull’universo.” Rivista trimestrale di studi filosofici e religiosi 4: 1–22.Google Scholar

Gabrieli, F. 1924. “Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāq.” Isis 6: 282–292.Google Scholar

Gabrieli, F. 1929. “Intorno alla versione araba della Poetica di Aristotele.” Rendiconti della Reale Accademia nazionale dei Lincei. Classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche, serie 6 (5): 224–235.Google Scholar

Gabrieli, F. 1932. “L’opera di Ibn al-Muqaffa‘.” Rivista degli Studi Orientali 13: 197–247.Google Scholar

Galston, M. 1988. “Al-Fārābī et la logique aristotélicienne dans la philosophie islamique.” In Aristote aujourd’hui, ed. Sinaceur, M., 192–217. Paris: érès.Google Scholar

Galston, M. 1990. Politics and Excellence: The Political Philosophy of Alfarabi. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gannagé, E. 2011. “Philopon (Jean-). Tradition arabe.“ In Goulet, 2011: 503–563.Google Scholar

Genequand, C. 1984. “Quelques aspects de l’idée de nature d’Aristote à al-Ghazālī.” Revue de Theologie et de Philosophie 116: 105–129.Google Scholar

Geoffroy, M. 2011. “The Arabic Aristotle.” In Encyclopaedia of Medieval Philosophy. Philosophy between 500 and 1500, ed. Lagerlund, H., 105–116. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Georr, Kh. 1948. Les Catégories d’Aristote dans leurs versions syro-arabes. Édition de textes précédée d’une étude historique et critique et suivie d’un vocabulaire technique. Beirut: Institut Français de Damas.Google Scholar

Gill, M. L. 2000. “[review] Helen S. Lang. The Order of Nature in Aristotle’s Physics: Place and the Elements.” British Journal for the History of Science 51(3): 549–557.Google Scholar

Gonzalez, M. P. 1992. “Hermann el Alemán, traductor de la Escuela de Toledo.” Anales Toledanos 29: 17–28.Google Scholar

Gonzálvez Ruiz, R. 1996. “El traductor Hermann el Alemán.” In La Escuela de Traductores de Toledo, ed. et al. Lopez-Alvarez, A. M., 51–64. Toledo: Disputación Provincial de Toledo.Google Scholar

Gonzálvez Ruiz, R. 1997. Hombres y libros de Toledo, 1086–1300. Madrid.Google Scholar

Goodman, L. E. 1990. “The Translation of Greek Materials into Arabic.” In Religion, Learning and Science in the ‘Abbasid Period, ed. Young, M. J. L., Latham, J. D., and Serjeant, R. B., 477–497. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goulet, R., ed., 1989–. Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques. Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar

Goulet, R. 2003–. Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques. Supplément. Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar

Grabmann, M. 1941. I divieti ecclesiastici di Aristotele sotto Innocenzo III e Gregorio IX. Roma: Saler.Google Scholar

Grignaschi, M. 1965–66. “Les Rasā’il ‘Arisṭāṭālīsa ‘ilā-al-Iskandar de Sālim Abū-l-‘Alā’ et l’activité culturelle à l’époque omayyade.” Bulletin d’Études Orientales 19: 7–83.Google Scholar

Grignaschi, M. 1967. “Le roman épistolaire classique conservé dans la version arabe de Sālim Abū l-‘Alā’.” Le Muséon 80: 211–264.Google Scholar

Grignaschi, M. 1968. “Al-Fārābī et l’Épître sur les connaissances à acquérir avant d’entreprendre l’étude de la philosophie.” Türkiyat Mecmuasi 15: 176–210.Google Scholar

Grignaschi, M. 1976. “L’origine et les métamorphoses du Sirr al-asrār.” Archives d’Histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age 43: 7–112.Google Scholar

Guidi, M. and Walzer, R. eds. 1940. “Studi su al-Kindī: i – Uno scritto introduttivo allo studio di Aristotele.” Atti della Reale Accademia dei Lincei, Memorie della classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche, serie 6: 375–405.Google Scholar

Gutas, D. 1975. Greek Wisdom Literature in Arabic Translation. A Study of the Graeco-Arabic Gnomologia. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Gutas, D. 1983. “Paul the Persian on the Classification of the Parts of Aristotle’s Philosophy: A Milestone between Alexandria and Baghdād.” Der Islam 60: 231–267.Google Scholar

Gutas, D. 1985. “The Starting Point of Philosophical Studies in Alexandrian and Arabic Aristotelianism.” In Theophrastus of Eresus. On his Life and Work, ed. Fortenbaugh, W. W., Huby, P., Long, A. A., 115–123. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gutas, D. 1986. “The spurious and the authentic in the Arabic Lives of Aristotle.” In Pseudo-Aristotle in the Middle Ages. The ‘Theology’ and other texts, ed. Ryan, W. F., Kraye, J., and Schmitt, C. B., 15–36. London: Warburg Institute.Google Scholar

Gutas, D. 1988. Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition. Introduction to reading Avicenna’s philosophical works. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Gutas, D. 1989. “Avicenna: Biography.” In Encyclopedia Iranica, ed. Yarshatar, E. at www.iranicaonline.org/articles/avicenna-iiGoogle Scholar

Gutas, D. 1990. “On Translating Averroes’ Commentaries.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 110: 92–101.Google Scholar

Gutas, D. 1998. Greek Thought, Arabic Culture. The Graeco-Arabic Translation Movement in Baghdad and Early ʿAbbāsid Society (2nd–4th/8th–10th Centuries). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Gutas, D. 1999. “The ‘Alexandria to Baghdād’ complex of narratives. A contribution to the study of philosophical and medical historiography among the Arabs.” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 10: 155–193.Google Scholar

Gutas, D. 2006. “Al-Kindī on the Categories” presented to the conference New Materials on Aristotle’s Categories conference held at Byron Bay, Australia, December 17–18, 2006, unpublished.Google Scholar

Gutas, D. 2009. “On Graeco-Arabic Epistolary Novels.” Middle Eastern Literatures 12: 59–70.Google Scholar

Gyekye, K. 1971. “The Terms ‘Prima Intentio’ and ‘Secunda Intentio’ in Arabic Logic.” Speculum 46: 32–38.Google Scholar

Habby, J. 1997. “Yuḥannā Ibn Ḥaylan maestro di al-Fārābī e l’Organon di Aristotele.” In La diffusione dell’eredità classica nell’età tardontica e medievale: forme e modi di trasmissione, ed. Valvo, A., 85–108. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar

Hadot, P. 1974. “L’harmonie des philosophies de Plotin et d’Aristote selon Porphyre dans le commentaire de Dexippe sur les Catégories.” In Plotino e il Neoplatonismo in Oriente e in Occidente, Atti del convegno internazionale, Rome, October 5–9, 1970, 31–47. Roma: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei.Google Scholar

Hadot, P. 1980. “Philosophie, dialectique, rhétorique dans l’antiquité.” Studia Philosophica 39: 139–166.Google Scholar

Hansberger, R. 2007. The Transmission of Aristotle’s Parva Naturalia in Arabic. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Hansberger, R. 2014. “The Arabic Adaptation of the Parva Naturalia (Kitāb al-ḥiss wa-l-maḥsūs).” Studia graeco-arabica 4: 301–314.Google Scholar

Hardison, O. B. 1970. “The Place of Averroes’ Commentary on the Poetics in the History of Medieval Criticism.” Medieval and Renaissance Studies 4: 57–81.Google Scholar

Hasnawi, A. 1984. “La dynamique d’Ibn Sina.” In Études sur Avicenne, ed. Jolivet, J. and Rashed, R., 104–123. Paris: Les belles lettres.Google Scholar

Hasnawi, A. 2001. “La définition du mouvement dans la Physique du Šifā’ d’Avicenne.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 11: 219–255.Google Scholar

Hasnawi, A. 2012 “L’âge de la démonstration. Logique, science et histoire: Al-Farabi, Avicenne, Avempace, Averroés.” In Circolazione dei saperi nel Mediterraneo: filosofia e scienze (secoli ix–xvii), ed. Federici-Vescovini, G and Hasnawi, A., 329–364. Firenze.Google Scholar

Hasse, D. 2000. Avicenna’s De Anima in the Latin West. London and Turin: Warburg Institute and Nino Aragno Editore.Google Scholar

Heinrichs, W. 1969. Arabische Dichtung und griechische Poetik. Ḥāẓim al-Qarṭāǧannīs Grundlegung der Poetik mit Hilfe aristotelischer Begriffe. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar

Heinrichs, W. 1978 “Die antike Verknüpfung von phantasia und Dichtung bei den Arabern.” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 128: 252–298.Google Scholar

Heinrichs, W. 1987. “Poetik, Rhetorik, Literaturkritik, Metrik und Reimlehre.” In Grundriss der arabischen Philologie, ed. Gätje, H., vol. 1, 177–207. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar

Hugonnard-Roche, H. 1989. “Aux origines de l’exégèse orientale de la logique d’Aristote: Sergius de Reš‘ayna († 536), médecin et philosophe.” Journal Asiatique 27: 1–17.Google Scholar

Hugonnard-Roche, H. 1993 “Remarques sur la tradition arabe de l’Organon d’après le manuscrit Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale, ar. 2346.” In Glosses and Commentaries on Aristotelian Logical Texts. The Syriac, Arabic, and Medieval Latin Traditions, ed. Burnett, C., 19–28. London: Warburg Institute.Google Scholar

Hugonnard-Roche, H. 1994. “Les traductions syriaques de l’Isagoge de Porphyre et la constitution du corpus syriaque de logique.” Revue d’Histoire des textes 24: 293–312.Google Scholar

Hugonnard-Roche, H. 1997a. “Note sur Sergius de Rešʿainā, traducteur du grec en syriaque et commentateur d’Aristote.” In Endress, G. and Kruk, R. 1997: 121–143.Google Scholar

Hugonnard-Roche, H. 1997b. “Les Catégories d’Aristote comme introduction à la philosophie dans un commentaire de Sergius de Rešʿainā.” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 8: 339–363.Google Scholar

Hugonnard-Roche, H. 1997c. “Comme la cigogne au désert: un prologue de Sergius de Rešʿainā à l’étude de la philosophie aristotélicienne en syriaque.” In Langages et philosophie. Hommage à Jean Jolivet, ed. De Libera, A., Elamrani-Jamal, A., and Galonnier, A., 79–97. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Hugonnard-Roche, H. 2000 “Le traité de logique de Paul le Perse: une interprétation tardo-antique de la logique aristotélicienne en syriaque.” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 11: 59–82.Google Scholar

Hugonnard-Roche, H. 2003a “La Poétique. Tradition syriaque et arabe.” In Goulet, 2003: 208–218.Google Scholar

Hugonnard-Roche, H. 2003b. “De Caelo. Tradition syriaque et arabe.” In Goulet, 2003: 283–294.Google Scholar

Hugonnard-Roche, H. 2004 “Éthique et politique au premier âge de la tradition syriaque.” Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph 57: 99–119.Google Scholar

Hugonnard-Roche, H. 2007 “Le corpus philosophique syriaque aux vie–viie siècles.” In The Libraries of the Neoplatonists, ed. D’Ancona, C., 279–291. Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar

Hugonnard-Roche, H. 2013 “Sur la lecture tardo-antique du Peri Hermeneias d’Aristote: Paul le Perse et la tradition d’Ammonius.” Studia graeco-arabica 3: 37–104.Google Scholar

Hugonnard-Roche, H. and Elamrani-Jamal, A. 1989. “L’Organon. Tradition syriaque et arabe.” In Goulet, 1989: 502–528.Google Scholar

Jaeger, W. 1967. Aristotle: Fundamentals of the History of His Development, 2nd edn, trans. Robinson, R.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Janos, D. 2009a. “Intellect, substance and motion in al-Fārābī’s cosmology.” McGill University Dissertation.Google Scholar

Janos, D. 2009b. “Al-Fārābī, Creation Ex Nihilo, and the Osmological Doctrine of K. Al-Jamʿ and Jawābāt.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 129 (1): 1–17.Google Scholar

Jolivet, J. 2004. “L’Épître sur la quantité des livres d’Aristote, par al-Kindī (une lecture).” In De Zénon d’Élée à Poincaré. Recueil d’études en hommage à Roshdi Rashed, ed. Morelon, Régis and Hasnawi, A., 665–683. Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar

Jourdain, C. 1843. Recherches critiques sur l’âge et l’origine des traductions latines d’Aristote et les commentaires grecs ou arabes employés par les docteurs scolastiques. New York: Burt Franklin Bibliographical Series.Google Scholar

Jullien, D. 2007. “In Praise of Mistranslation: The Melancholy Cosmopolitanism of Jorge Luis Borges.” Romanic Review 98: 205–223.Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1929. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Smith, N. K.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Kaukua, J. 2007. “Avicenna on subjectivity: A philosophical study.” University of Jyäskylä Dissertation.Google Scholar

Kemal, S. 2003. The Philosophical Poetics of Alfarabi, Avicenna and Averroës. The Aristotelian Reception. Culture and Civilization in the Middle East. London, New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Kennedy, H. 1981. The Early Abbasid Caliphate. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Kennedy, H. 2004 When Baghdad Ruled the Muslim World. The Rise and Fall of Islam’s Greatest Dynasty. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar

King, D. 2010. “Alexander of Aphrodisias’ On the Principles of the Universe in a Syriac Adaptation.” Le Muséon 123: 159–191.Google Scholar

Kogan, B. 1985.Averroes and the Metaphysics of Causation. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Kosman, L. A. 1969. “Aristotle’s definition of motion.” Phronesis 14: 40–62.Google Scholar

Kraemer, J. L. 1986. Philosophy in the Renaissance of Islam. Abū Sulaymān al-Sijistānī and his Circle. Studies in Islamic Culture and History 8. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Kraemer, J. L. 1992. Humanism in the Renaissance of Islam. The Cultural Revival during the Buyid Age. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Kraus, P. 1934. “Zu Ibn al-Muqaffa‘.” Rivista degli Studi Orientali 14: 1–20. [repr. in Alchemie, Ketzerei, Apokryphen Apokryphen im frühen Islam, ed. Brague, R., Olms, 1994]Google Scholar

Kraus, P. 1942–1943. Jābir ibn Ḥayyān. Contribution à l’histoire des idées scientifiques dans l’Islam, vol. ii: Jābir et la science grecque. Cairo.Google Scholar

Kruk, R. 1979. The Arabic version of Aristotle’s Parts of Animals: Books xi–xiv of the Kitāb al-Ḥayawān. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar

Kruk, R. 2003. “La zoologie aristotélicienne. Tradition arabe.” In Goulet, 2003: 329–334.Google Scholar

Kutsch, W. 1937. “Zur Geschichte der syrisch–arabischen Übersetzungliteratur.” Orientalia 6: 68–82.Google Scholar

Lafleur, C. 1988. Quatre introductions à la philosophie au xiiie siècle. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Lafleur, C. 1995. “Les ‘guides de l’étudiant’ de la Faculté des Arts de Paris au xiiie siècle.” In Philosophy and Learning. Universities in the Middle Ages, ed. Hoenen, M., Schneider, J., and Wieland, G., 137–199. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Lafleur, C. 1998 “Transformations et permanences dans le programme des études à la Faculté des Arts de l’Université de Paris au xiiie siècle.” Laval Théologique et Philosophique 54: 387–410.Google Scholar

Lafleur, C. and Carrier, J., eds., 1997. “L’enseignement de la philosophie au xiiie siècle. Autour du ‘Guide de l’étudiant’ du ms. Ripoll 109.” Studia Artistarum. vol. 5. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar

Lameer, J. 1993. “Aristotelian Rhetoric and Poetics as Logical Arts in Medieval Islamic Philosophy.” Bibliotheca Orientalis 50: cols. 563–582.Google Scholar

Lameer, J. 2006. Conception and Belief in Ṣadr al-Din Shīrāzī. Tehran: Iranian Institute of Philosophy.Google Scholar

Lang, H. 1992. Aristotle’s Physics and its Medieval Varieties. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Lang, H. 1998. The Order of Nature in Aristotle’s Physics. Place and the Elements. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Larcher, P. 1998. “Éléments de rhétorique aristotélicienne dans la tradition arabe hors la falsafa.” In La Rhétorique d’Aristote. Traditions et commentaires de l’antiquité au xviie siècle, ed. Dahan, G. and Rosier-Catach, I., 241–256. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Lettinck, P. 1994. Aristotle’s Physics and its Reception in the Arabic World, with an edition of the unpublished parts of Ibn Bājja’s Commentary on the Physics. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Lettinck, P. 1999 Aristotle’s Meteorology and its Reception in the Arab World, with an edition and translation of Ibn Suwar’s Treatise on Meteorological Phenomena and Ibn Bajja’s Commentary on the Meteorology. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Lettinck, P. 2002. “Aristotle’s ‘Physical’ Works in the Arabic World.” Medioevo 27: 22–52.Google Scholar

Lewis, F. 1996. “Self-knowledge in Aristotle.” Topoi 15: 39–58.Google Scholar

Lucchetta, G. A. 1987. La natura e la sfera: la scienza antica e le sue metafore nella critica di Razi. Lecce: Milella.Google Scholar

Luquet, G. H. 1901. “Hermann the German († 1272).” Revue de l’Histoire des Religions 44: 407–422.Google Scholar

Lyons, M. C., ed., 1982. Aristotle’s Ars Rhetorica: The Arabic Version. Cambridge: Pembroke Arabic Texts.Google Scholar

McGinnis, J. 2011. “Natural Knowledge in the Arabic Middle Age.” In Wrestling with Nature: From Omens to Science, ed. Harrison, P., Numbers, R. L., and Shank, M. M., 59–82. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McGuire, J. E. 1985. “Philoponus on Physics ii.1: physis, dunamis, and the motion of the simple bodies.” Ancient Philosophy 5 (2): 241–267.Google Scholar

Macierowski, E. M. and Hassing, R. F. 1988. “John Philoponus on Aristotle’s Definition of Nature.” Ancient Philosophy 8 (1): 73–100.Google Scholar

McMenomy, C. A. 1984. “The discipline of astronomy in the Middle Ages.” UCLA dissertation.Google Scholar

Madkour, I. 1969. L’Organon d’Aristote dans le monde arabe. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Mahdī, M. 1967. “Alfarabi against Philoponus.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 26: 233–260.Google Scholar

Mahdi, M. 1972. “The Arabic Text of Alfarabi’s Against John the Grammarian.” In Medieval and Middle Eastern Studies in Honor of Aziz Suryal Atiya, ed. Hanna, S. A.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Maier, A. 1951. Zwei Grundprobleme der scholastischen Naturphilosophie. Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura.Google Scholar

Maier, A. 1958. Zwischen Philosophie und Mechanik. Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura.Google Scholar

Manzalaoui, M. 1970–1971. “The pseudo-Aristotelian Kitāb Sirr al-asrār. Facts and Problems.” Oriens 23–24: 147–257.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. 1994. Prolegomena: Questions to be Settled before the Study of an Author, or a Text. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. 1998. Prolegomena Mathematica. From Apollonius of Perga to the Late Neoplatonism. With an Appendix on Pappus and the History of Platonism. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Mansion, A. 1945. Introduction à la Physique Aristotélicienne. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Marenbon, J. 2007. Medieval Philosophy: An Historical and Philosophical Introduction. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Margoliouth, D. ed. 1887. Analecta Orientalia ad Poeticam Aristoteleam. London: D. Nutt.Google Scholar

Marmura, M. 1965. “Ghazali and Demonstrative Science.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 3 (2): 183–209.Google Scholar

Marmura, M. 1986. “Avicenna’s ‘Flying Man’ in Context.” The Monist 69 (3): 383–395.Google Scholar

Marmura, M. 1990. “The Fortuna of the Posterior Analytics in the Arabic Middle Ages.” In Knowledge and the Sciences in Medieval Philosophy, Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Medieval Philosophy (SIEPM), Helsinki August 24–29, 1987, ed. Asztalos, M., Murdoch, J., and Niiniluoto, I., vol. 1, 85–103. Helsinki: Acta Philosophica Fennica.Google Scholar

Maróth, M. 2006. The Correspondence between Aristotle and Alexander the Great. An Anonymous Greek Novel in Letters in Arabic Translation. Piliscsaba: Avicenna Institute of Middle Eastern Studies.Google Scholar

Martijn, M. 2010. Proclus on Nature: Philosophy of Nature and Its Methods in Proclus’ Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Martin, A. 1989. “La Métaphysique. Tradition syriaque et arabe.” In Goulet, 1989: 528–534.Google Scholar

Martin, R. and Woodward, M., with Atmaja, D. 1997. Defenders of Reason in Islam: Mu’tazilism from Medieval School to Modern Symbol. Oxford: One World Press.Google Scholar

Menn, S. 2003. “Metaphysics: God and Being.” In The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Philosophy, ed. McGrade, A. S., 147–170. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Menn, S. 2008. “Al-Fārābī’s Kitāb al-Ḥurūf and his Analysis of the Senses of Being.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 18: 59–97.Google Scholar

Meyerhof, M. 1926. “New Light on Ḥunayn Ibn Isḥāq and His Period.” Isis 8: 685–724.Google Scholar

Micheau, F. 1997. “Les institutions scientifiques dans le Proche-Orient médiéval.” In Histoire des sciences arabes, 3. Technologie, alchimie et sciences de la vie, ed. Rashed, R., 233–254. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar

Miller, D. R. 1994. Sargis of Rešaina: On What the Celestial Bodies Know. In vi Symposium Syriacum, ed. Lavenant, R., 221–233. Roma: Pontificio Istituto Orientale. [repr. Orientalia Christiana Analecta 247]Google Scholar

Minio-Paluello, L. 1952. “Iacobus Veneticus Grecus: Canonist and Translator of Aristotle,” Traditio 8: 265–304. [repr. in Opuscula. The Latin Aristotle, 189–228. Amsterdam: Hakkert, 1972]Google Scholar

Moody, E. A. 1951. “Galileo and Avempace: The Dynamics of the Leaning Tower Experiment.” Journal of the History of Ideas 12: 163–193.Google Scholar

Moraux, P. 2001. Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen: von Andronicos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias. Vol. 3. Berlin: DeGruyter.Google Scholar

Morewedge, P., ed. 1992. Neoplatonism and Islamic Thought. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Nagy, A. 1893. “Notizie intorno alla retorica d’al-Fārābī.” Rendiconti della Academia dei lincei 5: 684–691.Google Scholar

Neria, C. M. 2013. “Al-Fārābī’s Lost Commentary on the Ethics: new textual evidence.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 23: 69–99.Google Scholar

Najjar, F. 1958. “Al-Farabi on Political Science.” Muslim World 48: 94–103.Google Scholar

Norman, R. 1969. “Aristotle’s Philosopher-God.” Phronesis 14.1: 63–74.Google Scholar

Oehler, K. 1974. “Aristotle on Self-Knowledge.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 118 (6): 493–506.Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. and Shamp, J. ed., 2006. Miroirs de prince de l’Empire romain au iv^e siècle. Fribourg: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Panoussi, E. 2000. “The Unique Arabic Manuscript of Aristotle’s Ars Rhetorica and its Two Editions Published to Date by ʿAbdurraḥmān Badawī and by M[alcolm] C. Lyons.” In Consciousness and Reality. Studies in Memory of Toshihiko Izutsu, ed. Āshtiyānī, S. J. et al., 233–250. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Parens, J. 1995. Metaphysics as Rhetoric: Alfarabi’s Summary of Plato’s Laws. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Parsons, T. 1990. Events and the Semantics of English. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Peters, F. E. 1968a. Aristotle and the Arabs: The Aristotelian Tradition in Islam. New York University Press.Google Scholar

Peters, F. E. 1968b. Aristoteles Arabus. The Oriental Translations and Commentaries on the Aristotelian Corpus. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Pines, S. 1952. “La ‘Philosophie Orientale’ d’Avicenne et sa polémique contre les Bagdadiens.” Archives d’Histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age 19: 1–37.Google Scholar

Pines, S. 1954. “La conception de la conscience de soi chez Avicenne et chez Abū al-Barakāt al-Baghdādī.” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 29: 21–56.Google Scholar

Pines, S. 1961. “Omne quod movetur necesse est ab aliquo moveri: A Refutation of Galen by Alexander of Aphrodisias and the Theory of Motion.” Isis 52 (1): 21–54.Google Scholar

Pines, S. 1979. “Études sur Awḥad al-Zamān Abū l-Barakāt al-Baghdādī.” In Studies in Abu l-Barakat al-Baghdadi, Physics and Metaphysics. The Collected Works of Shlomo Pines, vol. i, 1–96. Jerusalem: Magnes Press.Google Scholar

Pines, S. 1987. “A Parallel in the East to the Logica Vetus.” In Philosophie im Mittelalter, ed. Beckmann, J. P. et al., 125–129. Hamburg.Google Scholar

Platti, E. 1983. “Yaḥyā ibn ʿAdī, théologien chrétien et philosophe arabe.” Leuven: Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta.Google Scholar

Pollak, I. 1913. Die Hermeneutik des Aristoteles in der arabischen Übersetzung. Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes, vol. 13, 1. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Rashed, R. 1970. “Le modèle de la sphère transparante et l’explication de l’arc-en-ciel: Ibn al Haytham, al-Farisi.” Revue d’Histoire des Sciences 23: 109–140. [repr. Optique et Mathématiques. Ashgate, 1992]Google Scholar

Rashed, R. 1989. “Problems of the Transmission of Greek Scientific Thought into Arabic: Examples from Mathematics and Optics.” History of Science 27: 199–209.Google Scholar

Rashed, R. 1993. Géometrie et dioptrique au xe siècle. Ibn Sahl, al-Quhi et Ibn al-Haytham. Paris: Les belles lettres.Google Scholar

Rashed, R. 2003. “De Generatione et corruptione. Tradition arabe.” In Goulet, 2003: 304–314.Google Scholar

Rashed, R. 2006. “Greek into Arabic: Transmission and Translation.” In Arabic Theology, Arabic Philosophy. From the Many to the One, ed. Montgomery, J. E., 157–196. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar

Raven, W. 2003. “De mundo. Tradition syriaque et arabe.” In Goulet, 2003: 481–483.Google Scholar

Reisman, D. C. 2001. “Stealing Avicenna’s Books: A Study of the Historical Sources for the Life and Times of Avicenna.” In Before and After Avicenna: Proceedings of the First Conference of the Avicenna Study Group, ed. Reisman, D., 91–126. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Reisman, D. C. 2002. The Making of the Avicennan Tradition: The Transmission, Contents, and Structure of Ibn Sīnā’s al-Mubāḥathāt (The Discussions). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Reisman, D. C. 2009. “Avicenna’s Enthymeme: A Pointer.” Arabica 56: 529–542.Google Scholar

Reisman, D. C. 2013. “The Life and Times of Avicenna. Patronage and Learning in Medieval Islam.” In Interpreting Avicenna: Critical Essays, ed. Adamson, P., 7–27. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rémondon, D. 1954. “Al-Akhlāq wa-l-Infiʿālāt al-Nafsāniyyah.” Mémorial Avicenne 4: 19–29. Cairo: Publications de l’Institut français d’archéologie orientale du Caire.Google Scholar

Rescher, N. 1963. “Al-Kindī’s Sketch of Aristotle’s Organon.” New Scholasticism 37: 44–58.Google Scholar

Rescher, N. 1967. “Avicenna’s Logic of Questions.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 49 (1): 1–6.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, F. 1942. “Al-Kindī als Literat.” Orientalia 2: 262–288.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, F. 1975. The Classical Heritage in Islam. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Rosier-Catach, I. 1998a. “Roger Bacon, al-Farabi et Augustin. Rhétorique, logique et philosophie morale.” In La Rhétorique d’Aristote. Traditions et commentaires de l’antiquité au xviie siècle, ed. Dahan, G. and Rosier-Catach, I., 87–110. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Rosier-Catach, I. 1998b. “Fragments du Grand commentaire à la Rhétorique d’al-Fārābī.” In “Rhétorique” d’Aristote. Traditions et commentaires de l’antiquité au xviie siècle, ed. Dahan, G. and Rosier-Catach, I., 169–225. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Ṣāʿid, Q. 1912. Kitāb tabaqāt al-umam (Les catégories des nations), ed. Cheiko, L.. Paris: Larose.Google Scholar

Saffrey, H. D. 1954. “Introduction,” in d’Aquin, Thomas, Super Librum de causis expositio, Fribourg (2nd edn, Paris: Vrin, 2002).Google Scholar

Saliba, G. 2007. Arabic Science and the Making of the European Renaissance. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Salman, D. 1939. “The Medieval Latin Translations of Alfarabi’s Works.” New Scholasticism 13: 254–261.Google Scholar

Schacht, J. 1991. “Mayta.” Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edn, vol. vi, ed. Bosworth, C. E., Van Donzel, E., and Pellat, C., 916–918. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Schoeler, G. 1980. “Averroes’ Rückwendung zu Aristoteles. Die ‘Kurzen’ und die ‘Mittleren Kommentare zum Organon.’” Bibliotheca Orientalis 37: 294–301.Google Scholar

Schoeler, G. 1983. “Der poetische Syllogismus. Ein Beitrag zum Verständnis der ‘logischen’ Poetik der Araber.” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 133: 43–92.Google Scholar

Schoeler, G. 2005. “Poetischer Syllogismus – bildliche Redeweise – Religion. Vom aristotelischen Organon zu al-Fārābīs Religionstheorie.” In Logik und Theologie. Das Organon im arabischen und im lateinischen Mittelalter, ed. Perler, D. and Rudolph, U., 45–58. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Schoeler, G. 2013. “The ‘Poetic Syllogism’ Revisited.” Oriens 41: 1–26.Google Scholar

Schoonheim, P. 2000. Aristotle’s Meteorology in the Arabico-Latin Tradition. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Schoonheim, P. 2003. “Météorologiques. Tradition syriaque, arabe et latine.” In Goulet, 2003: 324–328.Google Scholar

Schrier, O. 1995. “Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāq on Tragedy and Comedy: A New Fragment of Galen.” Mnemosyne 48: 344–348.Google Scholar

Schrier, O. 1997. “The Syriac and Arabic Versions of Aristotle’s Poetics.” In Endress and Kruk 1997: 259–278.Google Scholar

Sebti, M. 2007. “Une copie inconnue d’une paraphrase anonyme conservée en arabe du De Anima d’Aristote. Le MS Ayasofia 4156.” In D’Ancona 2007: 399–414.Google Scholar

Sharkey, E. J. 2006. “The Comedy of Language in Borges’ ‘La busca de Averroes.’” Rocky Mountain Review 60: 53–69.Google Scholar

Smith, W. ed., 1844. Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology. London: Spottiswoode.Google Scholar

Solmsen, F. 1960. Aristotle’s System of the Physical World. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. 1988. Matter, Space, and Motion: Theories in Antiquity and Their Sequel. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. ed., 2005. Philosophy of the Commentators 200–600 a.d. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. 2006. Self. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Sourdel, D. 1962. “La politique religieuse du calife ‘abbaside al-Ma’mūn.” Revue des Études Islamiques 30: 27–48.Google Scholar

Steinschneider, M. 1889. Die arabischen Übersetzungen aus dem Griechischen. Graz: Akademische Druck und Verlagsanstalt. [repr. 1960]Google Scholar

Steinschneider, M. 1956. Die europäischen Übersetzungen aus dem Arabischen bis Mitte des 17. Jahrhunderts. Graz: Akademische Druck und Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar