Book contents
- Aristotle’sEthicsand Medieval Philosophy
- Aristotle’sEthicsand Medieval Philosophy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 Preliminary considerations
- 2 Practical wisdom in the moral theory of Aristotle
- 3 The moral theories of William of Auxerre and Philip the Chancellor
- 4 The earliest medieval Latin commentaries on theNicomachean Ethics
- 5 The early moral works of Albert the Great
- 6 Happiness, prudence and moral reasoning in the later works of Albert the Great
- 7 Thomas Aquinas and Bonaventure on the understanding of moral goodness
- 8 Two commentaries on theNicomachean Ethicsin the late thirteenth century
- 9 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2015
Book contents
- Aristotle’sEthicsand Medieval Philosophy
- Aristotle’sEthicsand Medieval Philosophy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 Preliminary considerations
- 2 Practical wisdom in the moral theory of Aristotle
- 3 The moral theories of William of Auxerre and Philip the Chancellor
- 4 The earliest medieval Latin commentaries on theNicomachean Ethics
- 5 The early moral works of Albert the Great
- 6 Happiness, prudence and moral reasoning in the later works of Albert the Great
- 7 Thomas Aquinas and Bonaventure on the understanding of moral goodness
- 8 Two commentaries on theNicomachean Ethicsin the late thirteenth century
- 9 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Aristotle's Ethics and Medieval PhilosophyMoral Goodness and Practical Wisdom, pp. 243 - 252Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Primary Sources
Cambridge, MS Peterhouse 206 (=C), ff. 285ra–307vb. Contains the commentary on the Ethica vetus and nova attributed to Robert Kilwardby.Google Scholar
Erfurt, Bibliotheca Amploniana, MS F 13 (=E), ff. 84r–119r. Contains the anonymous Quaestiones in Ethicam.Google Scholar
Florence, Naz. MS conv. soppr. G 4.853 (=F). Contains the commentary on the Ethica vetus and nova wrongly attributed to John Pecham.Google Scholar
Prague, Czech State Library (olim University) MS. III. F. 10 (=Pr). Contains the commentary on the Ethica nova attributed to Robert Kilwardby.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Magnus, Albertus. De homine (=DH), ed. Anzulewicz, H. and Söder, J.. Alberti magni Opera omnia 27, 2. Münster: Aschendorff, 2008.Google Scholar
Magnus, Albertus. De bono, ed. Kühle, H. et al. Alberti magni Opera omnia 28. Münster: Aschendorff, 1951.Google Scholar
Magnus, Albertus. De natura boni, ed. Filthaut, E.. Albert magni Opera omnia 25, 1. Münster: Ashcendorff, 1974.Google Scholar
Magnus, Albertus. Quaestiones, ed. Kübel, W. and Anzulewicz, H.. Alberti magni Opera omnia 25, 2. Münster: Aschendorff, 1993.Google Scholar
Magnus, Albertus. Super Ethica commentum et quaestiones libri quinque priores (=SE), ed. Kübel, W.. Alberti magni Opera omnia 14, 1. Münster: Aschendorff, 1968.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Ethica Nicomachea (=NE). ed. Bywater, I.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1894. Nicomachean Ethics, tr. Ross, D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1908.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Ethica Nicomachea, Nova, Ethica, ed. Gauthier, R.-A.. Aristoteles Latinus. Leiden-Brussels and Brill, 1974, XXVI, fasc. 1–3.Google Scholar
Augustine, . De civitate Dei, XII, 9, ed. Dombart, B. and Kalb, A.. Corpus christianorum series latina, 47–48. Turnhout: Brepols, 1955.Google Scholar
Averroes, . Commentarium magnum in Aristotelis de anima libros, ed. Crawford, F. S.. Corpus commentariorum Averrois in Aristotelem, VI, I. Cambridge, MA: The Medieval Academy of America, 1953.Google Scholar
Bonaventure, . Commentaria in quatuor libros Sententiarum Magistri Petri Lombardi. Doctoris Seraphici S. Bonaventurae Opera omnia, vv. 1–4. Quaracchi: Ad claras aquas, 1882–1889.Google Scholar
Bonaventure, . Iter mentis ad Deum. Doctoris Seraphici S. Bonaventurae Opera omnia, v. 5. Quaracchi: Ad claras aquas, 1891.Google Scholar
Chartularium Universitatis Parisiensis (CUP), ed. Denifle, H. and Châtelain, E.. Paris, 1889.Google Scholar
Cicero, . De legibus, ed. Powell, J.. M. Tulli Ciceronis De Re Publica, De Legibus … Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Cicero, . De officiis, ed. Winterbottom, M.. M. Tulli Ciceronis De Officiis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry of Ghent. Quodlibet I, 14, ed. Macken, R.. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Hugh of St. Victor. Didascalion, ed. Buttimer, C.. Hugonis de Sancto Didascalion. De studio legendi. Washington: The Catholic University of America Press, 1939.Google Scholar
Kant, I. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, Akademie Textausgabe. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1903/1911.Google Scholar
Philip the Chancellor. Philippi Cancellarii Parisiensis Summa de Bono (=SDB), ed. Wicki, N.. Corpus Philosophorum Medii Aevi: Opera philosophica mediae aetatis selecta, II. Bern: Francke, 1985.Google Scholar
Brito, Radulpus. Le questiones di Radulfo Brito sull’ ‘Etica Nicomachea’ Introduzione e testo critico (=Questiones), ed. Costa, I.. Studia Artistarum, 17. Turnhout: Brepols, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilwardby, Robert. De ortu scientiarum, ed. Judy, A.. Auctores Britannici Medii Aevi, 4. Toronto, Oxford: The British Academy and The Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1976.Google Scholar
Statuta Antiqua Universitatis Oxoniensis (=St. Ox.), ed. Gibson, S.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1931.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, all works cited are from the Leonine edition, Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII P.M. edita, cura et studia Fratrum Praedicatorum. Romae: ad Sanctae Sabinae, 1882-ss., unless otherwise noted.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. De virtutibus, Quaestiones disputatae de virtutibus in communi, ed. Odetto, E.. Taurin, Rome: Marietti, 1965.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Scriptum super libros Sententiarum magistri Petri Lombardi epsicopi Parisiensis, ed. Mandonnet, P. and Moos, M.. Paris: Lethielleux, 1929–1947.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. In XII libros Metaphysicorum expositio, ed. Cathala, M.-R. and Spiazzi, R.. Taurin, Rome: Marietti, 1964.Google Scholar
William of Auxerre. Summa aurea magistri Guillelmi Altissioderensi (=SA), ed. Ribaillier, J.. Paris: Spicelegium Bonaveturianum, 18, 1980–1987.Google Scholar
Ackrill, J. “Aristotle on Eudaimonia,” Aristotle’s Ethics: Critical Essays (see Sherman, N.), 57–77.Google Scholar
Adams, M. M. “Ockham on Will, Nature and Morality,” The Cambridge Companion to Ockham, ed. Spade, P.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999, 245–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, M. M. “The Structure of Ockham’s Moral Theory,” Franciscan Studies, 29 (1986), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, J. “Aristotle on Virtue and Happiness,” Aristotle’s Ethics: Critical Essays, ed. Sherman, N.. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 1999, 35–55.Google Scholar
Annas, J. The Morality of Happiness. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Annas, J. Platonic Ethics, Old and New. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Anzulewicz, H. “‘Bonum’ als Schlüsselbegriff bei Albertus Magnus,” Albertus Magnus zum Gedenken nach 800 Jahren: Neue Zugänge, Aspekte und Perspektiven, ed. Senner, W. et al. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2001, 113–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzulewicz, H. and Söder, J., ed. and tr. Albertus Magnus, Űber den Menschen, De homine. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2004.Google Scholar
Bejczy, I. The Cardinal Virtues in the Middle Ages: A Study in Moral Thought from the Fourth to the Fourteenth Century. Leiden: Brill, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossier, F. “L’élaboration du vocabulaire philosophique chez Burgundio de Pise,” Aux origines du lexique philosophique européen. L’influence de la latinitas. Actes du Colloque international organisé à Rome. Academia Belgica, 23–25 mai 1996, ed. Hamesse, J.. Louvain-la-Neuve: Fédération Internationale des Instituts d’Etudes Médiévales, 1997, 81–116.Google Scholar
Bossier, F. “Les ennuis d’un traducteur. Quatre annotations sur la première traduction latine de l’Ethique à Nicomaque par Burgundio de Pise,” Bijdragen. Tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie, 59 (1998), 406–427.Google Scholar
Bradley, D. Aquinas on the Twofold Human Good. Washington: The Catholic University of America Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Buffon, V. “Happiness and Knowledge in Some Masters of Arts before 1250: An Analysis of Some Commentaries on Book I of Nicomachean Ethics,” Patristica et Mediaevalia, 25 (2004), 111–115.Google Scholar
Buffon, V. “Philosophers and Theologians on Happiness: An Analysis of Early Latin Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics,” Laval théologique et philosophique, 60 (2004), 449–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buffon, V. “The Structure of the Soul, Intellectual Virtues, and the Ethical Ideal of Masters of Arts in Early Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics,” Virtue Ethics in the Middle Ages: Commentaries on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, 1200–1250, ed. Bejczy, I.. Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History, 160. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2008, 13–30.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. “Aristotle on Learning to Be Good,” Aristotle’s Ethics, ed. Rorty, A. O.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980, 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callus, D. A. “The ‘Tabulae Super Originalia Patrum’ of Robert Kilwardby O.P.,” Studia Mediaevalia in honorem R.J. Martin. Bruges: De Tempel, 1948, 243–270.Google Scholar
Celano, A., “Act of the Intellect or Act of the Will: The Critical Reception of Aristotle’s Ideal of Human Perfection in the 13th and Early 14th Centuries,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge, 57 (1990), 93–119.Google Scholar
Celano, A. “Aristotle on Beatitude,” Ancient Philosophy, V, 2 (1985), 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celano, A. “Boethius of Dacia on the Highest Good,” Traditio, 43 (1987), 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celano, A. “The Concept of Worldly Beatitude in the Writings of Thomas Aquinas,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 25 (1987), 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celano, A. “The End of Practical Wisdom: Ethics as Science in the Thirteenth Century,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 33 (1995), 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celano, A. “The ‘Finis Hominis’ in the Thirteenth-Century Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge, 53 (1986), 23–53.Google Scholar
Celano, A. “Peter of Auvergne’s Questions on Books I and II of the Nicomachean Ethics: A Study and Critical Edition,” Mediaeval Studies, 48 (1986), 1–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celano, A. “Phronesis, Prudence and Moral Goodness in the Thirteenth Century Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics,” Mediaevalia Philosophica Polonorum, 36 (2007), 5–27.Google Scholar
Celano, A. “Play and the Theory of Basic Human Goods,” American Philosophical Quarterly, 28 (1991), 137–146.Google Scholar
Celano, A. “A Question of Justice: The Good Thief, Cain and the Pursuit of Moral Perfection,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology in the Long Middle Ages: A Tribute to Stephen F. Brown, ed. Friedman, R., Emery, K. and Speer, A., Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters, 105. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2011, 321–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celano, A. “The Understanding of Beatitude, the Perfection of the Soul, in the Early Latin Commentaries on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics,” Documenti e Studi sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale, 17 (2006), 1–22.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. “Contemplation and Happiness: A Reconstruction,” Synthese, 72 (1987), 187–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtenay, W. “Radulphus Brito: Master of Arts and Theology,” Cahièrs de l’Institut du Moyen-âge grec et latin, 76 (2005), 131–158.Google Scholar
Dahan, G. “Une introduction à l’étude de la philosphie: Ut ait Tullius,” L’enseignement de la philosophie au XIIIe siècle: Autour du ‘Guide de l’etudiant du ms. Ripoll 109, ed. Lafleur, C. with Carrier, J.. Studia artistarum, 5. Brepols: Turnhout, 1997, 3–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deman, T.-H. Saint Thomas d’Aquin, Somme théologique. La prudence: 2a-2ae, questions 47–56, traduction françaises, notes et appendices. Paris, Tournai & Rome: Desclée & Cie, 1949.Google Scholar
Dirlmeier, F. Eudemische Ethik Übersetzt und kommentiert von Franz Dirlmeier. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1984.Google Scholar
Farrell, D. The Ends of Moral Virtues and the First Principles of Practical Reason in Thomas Aquinas. Rome: Gregorian and Biblical Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. Moral Absolutes: Tradition, Revision and Truth. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. Natural Law and Natural Rights, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. “Natural Law: The Classical Tradition,” The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, ed. Coleman, J. and Shapiro, S., S. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2002, 1–60.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. “Practical Reasoning, Human Goods and the End of Man,” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, 58 (1984), 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, H. G. Nikomachische Ethik VI/Aristoteles. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1998.Google Scholar
Gauthier, R.-A. “Arnoul de Provence et la doctrine de la ‘fronesis’, vertu mystique suprême,” Revue du Moyen Âge Latin, 19 (1963), 135–170.Google Scholar
Gauthier, R.-A. “Le Cours sur l’Ethica nova d’un maitre ès Arts de Paris (1235–1240),”) [=Le cours]. Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge, 42 (1975), 71–141.Google Scholar
Gauthier, R.-A. “Trois commentaires ‘averroistes’ sur l’Ethique à Nicomaque,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge, 16 (1947–1948), 187–336.Google Scholar
Gauthier, R.-A. and Jolif, Y. L’Ėthique à Nicomaque, trans. et comm. Louvain: Publications universitaires, 1970.Google Scholar
Gigon, O. Die Nikomachische Ethik, eingeleitet und übertragen von Olof Gigon. Zurich: Akademie Verlag, 1951.Google Scholar
Gilson, E. The Christian Philosophy of St. Bonaventure, tr. Trethowan, I. and Sheed, F.. Patterson: St. Anthony Guild, 1965.Google Scholar
Grisez, G. Way of the Lord Jesus, v. 1: Christian Moral Principles. Chicago: Franciscan Herald Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Grisez, G., Boyle, J. and Finnis, J. “Practical Principles, Moral Truth and Ultimate Ends,” American Journal of Jurisprudence, 58 (1987), 99–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, W. A History of Greek Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979–1981.Google Scholar
Hardie, W. F. R. “Aristotle on the Best Life for a Man,” Philosophy, 54 (1979), 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, W. F. R. “The Final Good in Aristotle’s Ethics,” Philosophy, 40 (1965), 277–295; repr. in Aristotle: A Collection of Critical Essays, 297–322 (see Moravcsik, J.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hissette, R. “La date de quelques commentaires à l’Éthique,” Bulletin de Philosophie Mèdièvale, 18 (1976), 79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hittinger, R. A Critique of the New Natural Law Theory. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, T. “Conscience and Synderesis,” The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas, ed. Davies, B. and Stump, E.. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2012, 255–264.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, T. “Prudence and Practical Principles,” Aquinas and the Nicomachean Ethics. Hoffmann, T., Müller, J. and Perkams, M., ed. (1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, T., Müller, J. and Perkhams, M., ed. (2). Das Problem der Willenschwäche in der Mittelalterlichen Philosophie (The Problem of Weakness of Will in Medieval Philosophy), Rechérches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales: Bibliotheca, 8. Louvain: Peeters, 2006.Google Scholar
Homiak, M. “Moral Character,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 Edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/moral-character/.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. “Prudence and Morality in Greek Ethics,” Ethics, 105 (1995), 284–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, W. Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture, tr. Highet, G.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
James, M. R. A Descriptive Catalogue of the Manuscripts in the Library of Peterhouse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1899.Google Scholar
Joachim, H. H. Aristotle the Nicomachea Ethics, ed. Rees, D. A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Kenny, A. “Happiness,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series 66 (1965–1966), 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kershaw, I. The End: The Defiance and Destruction of Hitler’s Germany, 1944–1945. London: The Penguin Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Kraut, R. Aristotle on the Human Good. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafleur, C. Quatre introductions à la philosophie au XIIIe siècle. Textes critiques et étude historique. Publications de l’Institut d’études médiévales, XXIII. Montreal, Louvain: Vrin, 1988.Google Scholar
Lafleur, C. with Carrier, J. ed., Le ‘Guide de l’étudiant’ d’un maitre anonyme de la faculté des arts de Paris au XIIIe siècle. Édition critique provisoire du ms. Barcelona, Arxiu de la Corona d’Aragó, Ripoll 109, fol 134ra-158va. Québec: Faculté de Philosophie, Université Laval, 1992.Google Scholar
Langston, D. Conscience and Other Virtues: From Bonaventure to Macintyre. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Le Boulluec, A. “Recherches sur les origenes du thème de la syndérèse dans la tradition patristique,” Vers la contemplation. Études sur la syndérèse et le modalités de la contemplation de l’antiquité a la renaissance, ed. Trottmann, C.. Paris: Champion, 2007, 61–77.Google Scholar
Lehmann, P. Mittelalterliche Bibliothekskataloge Deutschlands und der Schweiz. Munich: Beck, 1969.Google Scholar
Lottin, O. Psychologie et morale aux XIIe et XIIIe siècles. Louvain, Gembloux: Abbaye du Mont César, Duclot, 1942–1949.Google Scholar
Luscombe, D. “Ethics in the Early Thirteenth Century,” Albertus Magnus und die Anfänge der Aristoteles-Rezeption im lateinischen Mittelalter: Von Richardus Rufus bis zu Franciscus de Mayronis, ed. Honnefelder, L. et al. Aschendorff: Münster, 2005, 657–684.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Macken, R. “Heinrich von Gent im Gespräch mit seinen Zeitgenossen über die menschliche Freiheit,” Franziskanische Studien, 59 (1977), 125–182.Google Scholar
Macken, R. “La volonté humaine, faculté plus élevée que l’intelligence selon Henri de Gand,” Recherches de Théologie ancienne et médiévale, 42 (1975), 5–51.Google Scholar
Marrou, H. I. A History of Education in Antiquity, tr. Lamb, G.. New York: Sheed and Ward, 1956.Google Scholar
Maurer, A. “Siger of Brabant on the Fables and Falsehoods of Religion,” Mediaeval Studies, 43 (1981), 515–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCluskey, C. “Albertus Magnus and Thomas Aquinas on the Freedom of Human Action,” Albertus Magnus zum Gedenken nach 800 Jahren: Neue Zugänge, Aspekte und Perspektiven, ed. Senner, W. et al. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2001, 243–254.Google Scholar
McInerny, R. “Action Theory in St. Thomas Aquinas,” Miscellanea Mediaevalia 19, Thomas von Aquin Werk und Wirkung im Licht neuerer Forschung, ed. Zimmermann, A.. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter, 1988, 13–22.Google Scholar
McInerny, R. “Thomistic Natural Law and Aristotelian Philosophy,” St. Thomas Aquinas and the Natural Law Tradition Contemporary Perspectives, ed. Goyette, J. et al. Washington: The Catholic University of America Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Meersseman, G. ed. Laurentii Pignon Catalogi et Chronica, accedunt Catalogi Stamensis et Upsalensis Scriptorum O.P. Rome: Monumenta Ordinis Fratrum Praedicatorum Historica, XVIII, 1936.Google Scholar
Miller, J. ed. The Reception of Aristotle’s Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Minio-Paluello, L. “Note sull’Aristotele latino medievale, VII,” Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica, 44 (1952), 485–495.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, J. Aristotle: A Collection of Critical Essays, Garden City: Anchor Books, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulchahey, M. First the Bow Is Bent in Study: Dominican Education. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1998.Google Scholar
Müller, J. “Duplex Beatitudo: Aristotle’s Legacy and Aquinas’s Conception of Human Happiness,” Aquinas and the Nicomachean Ethics see Hoffmann, T., Müller, J. and Perkhams, M., (2) 2013. 52–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, J. “Ethics as a Practical Science in Albert the Great’s Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics,” Albertus Magnus zum Gedenken nach 800 Jahren: Neue Zugänge, Aspekte und Perspektiven, ed. Senner, W. et al. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2001, 275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, J. Natürliche Moral und philosophische Ethik bei Albertus Magnus. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters: Texte und Untersuchungen, Neue Folge, 59. Münster: Aschendorff, 2001.Google Scholar
Müller, J. Willenschwäche in Antike und Mittelalter. Eine Problemgeschichte von Sokrates bis zum Johannes Duns Scotus. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. “The Discernment of Perception: An Aristotelian Conception of Private and Public Rationality,” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy, 1 (1985), 151–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Owens, J. “The KALON in Aristotelian Ethics,” Studies in Aristotle, ed. O’Meara, D. J.. Washington: The Catholic University of America Press, 1981, 261–278.Google Scholar
Owens, J. “Value and Practical Knowledge in Aristotle,” Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy IV: Aristotle’s Ethics, ed. Anton, J. and Preuss, A.. Albany: SUNY Press, 1991, 153–157.Google Scholar
Parry, R. “Episteme and Techne,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, E. (Fall, 2007), URL= http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/episteme-techne/.Google Scholar
Payer, P. “Prudence and the Principles of Natural Law: A Medieval Development,” Speculum, 54 (1979), 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelzer, A. “Le cours inédit d’Albert le Grand sur la morale à Nicomaque recuilli et rédigé par S. Thomas d’Aquin,” Revue néoscolatique de philosophie, 24 (1922), 331–361, 479–520.Google Scholar
Perkams, M. “Aquinas on Choice, Will and Voluntary Action,” Aquinas and the Nicomachean Ethics, ed. Hoffmann, T., Müller, J. and Perkams, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 72–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, J. “Contested Categories: Reason, Nature and Natural Order in Medieval Accounts of the Natural Law,” The Journal of Religious Ethics, 24 (1996), 207–232.Google Scholar
Queneau, G. “Origine de la sentence ‘Intellectus speculativus extensione fit practicus’ et date du Commentaire du De Anima de S. Albert le Grand,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et medievale, 21 (1954), 307–312.Google Scholar
Rackham, H. Athenian Constitution, Eudemian Ethics and Virtues and Vices. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Rhonheimer, M. Natural Law and Practical Reason: A Thomist View of Moral Autonomy, tr. Malsbary, G.. New York: Fordham University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. “Aristotle on Responsibility for Action and Character,” Ancient Philosophy, 9 (1989), 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, A. O. “Virtues and Their Vicissitudes,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 13 (Ethical Theory: Character and Virtue), ed. French, P. et al. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988, 136–148.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J. “The Meaning of Phronesis in the Eudemian Ethics,” Untersuchungen zur Eudemischen Ethik, ed. Moraux, P. et al. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1971, 73–92.Google Scholar
Schneyer, J. Die Sittenkritik in den Predigten Philipps des Kanzlers. Münster: Aschendorff, 1962.Google Scholar
Schollmeier, P. “Aristotle on Practical Wisdom,” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung,” 43 (1989), 124–132.Google Scholar
Sherman, N. ed. Aristotle’s Ethics: Critical Essays. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 1999.Google Scholar
Söder, J. “Die Erprobung der Vernunft. Vom Umgang mit Traditionen in De homine,” Albertus Magnus zum Gedenken nach 800 Jahren: Neue Zugänge, Aspekte und Perspektiven, ed. Senner, W. et al. Berlin, Akademie Verlag, 2001, 1–13.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, R. Moral Action: A Phenomenological Study. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Somme, L. T. “The Infallibility, Impeccability and Indestructibility of Synderesis,” Studies in Christian Ethics, 19 (2006), 403–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorabji, R. “Aristotle on the Role of Intellect in Virtue,” Aristotle’s Ethics, ed. Rorty, A. O.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980, 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souchard, B. “La singulière primauté aristotélicienne de la raison théorique sur la raison pratique,” Vers la contemplation: Études sur la syndérèse et les modalités de la contemplation de l’antiquité à la renaissance, ed. Trottmann, C.. Paris: Honoré Champion, 2007, 27–45.Google Scholar
Sparshot, F. Taking Life Seriously – A Study of the Argument for the Nicomachean Ethics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stammkötter, F.-B. “Die Entwicklung der Bestimmung der Prudentia in der Ethik des Albertus Magnus,” Albertus Magnus zum Gedenken nach 800 Jahren: Neue Zugänge, Aspekte und Perspektiven, ed. Senner, W. et al. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2001, 303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegmüller, F. “Neugefundene Questiones des Siger von Brabant,” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévale, 3 (1931), 158–182.Google Scholar
Stone, M. “Henry of Ghent on Freedom and Human Action,” Henry of Ghent and the Transformation of Scholastic Thought, Studies in Memory of Jos Decorte, ed. Guldentops, G. and Steel, C.. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2003, 201–225.Google Scholar
Striker, G. “Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 19 (1989), 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Striker, G. “Origins of the Concept of Natural Law,” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, 2 (1987), 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturlese, L. Die deutsche Philosophie im Mittelalter. Von Bonifatius bis zu Albert dem Großen (748–1280). Munich: Beck, 1993.Google Scholar
Tracey, M. “Albert on Incontinence, Continence and Divine Virtue,” ed. Hoffmann, T., Müller, J. and Perkhams, M.. (2). Louvain: Peeters, 2006, 197–220.Google Scholar
Tracey, M. “An Early 13th-Century Commentary on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics I, 4–10: The Lectio cum Questionibus of an Arts-Master at Paris in MS Napoli Biblioteca Nazionale, VIII G 8, ff. 4r-9v,” Documenti e Studi sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale, 17, 2006, 23–70.Google Scholar
Tracey, M. “Prudentia in the Parisian summae of William of Auxerre, Philip the Chancellor, and Albert the Great,” Subsidia Albertina II: Via Alberti Texte–Quellen–Interpretationen, ed. Honnefelder, L., Möhle, H. and del Barrio, S. Bullido. Münster: Aschendorff, 2009, 267–293.Google Scholar
Tracey, M. “Virtus in the Naples Commentary on the Ethica nova (MS Napoli Biblioteca Nazionale, VIII G 8, ff. 4r-9vb),” Virtue Ethics in the Middle Ages: Commentaries on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, 1200–1250, ed. Bejczy, I.. Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History, 160. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2008, 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trottmann, C. “La syndérèse selon Albert le Grand,” Albertus Magnus zum Gedenken nach 800 Jahren: Neue Zugänge, Aspekte und Perspektiven, ed. Senner, W. et al. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2001, 253–273.Google Scholar
Trottmann, C. “La syndérèse, sommet de la nature humaine dans l’Itinerarium mentis in Deum,” Dionysius, 18 (2000), 129–150.Google Scholar
Trottmann, C. La vision béatifique, des disputes scolastiques à sa définition par Benoît XII. Bibliothèque des ecoles françaises d’Athènes et de Rome, 289. Rome: Ecole française de Rome, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trottmann, C. “Scintilla synderesis. Pour une auto-critique mediévale de la raison la plus pure en son usage pratique,” Miscellanea Mediaevalia, 27, Geistesleben in 13. Jahrhundert, ed. Aertsen, J. and Speer, A.. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter, 2000, 116–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vega, J. “Aristotle’s Concept of Law: Beyond Positivism and Natural Law,” Journal of Ancient Philosophy, 4 (2010), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbeke, G. “L’éducation morale et les arts chez Aristote et Thomas d’Aquin,” Miscellanea Mediaevalia 22, Scientia und ars in Hoch-und Spätmittelalter, ed. Craemer-Ruegenberg, I. and Speer, A.. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1994, 449–467.Google Scholar
Wallace, J. “Ethics and the Craft Analogy,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 13 (Ethical Theory: Character and Virtue), ed. French, P. et al. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988, 222–232.Google Scholar
White, N. “Conflicting Parts of Happiness in Aristotle’s Ethics,” Ethics, 105 (1995), 258–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicki, N. Die Philosophie Philipps des Kanzlers: ein philosophierender Theologe des frühen 13. Jahrhunderts. Dokimion, 29. Fribourg: Academic Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Wieland, G. “Albertus Magnus und die Frage nach menschlichen Glück – zur ersten Kölner Ethikvorlesung,” Kölner Universitätsreden, H. 80, Albert der Große in Köln. Gehalten auf der Feierstunde zur 750sten Wiederkehr der Einrichtung des Kölner Generalstudiums der Dominikaner am 6. November 1998, ed. Aertsen, J.. Köln, 1999.Google Scholar
Wieland, G. “Ethica docens – ethica utens,” Miscellanea medievalia, 13, Sprache und Erkenntnis im Mittelalter, ed. Beckmann, J. P. et al. Berlin, New York: W. de Gruyter, 1981, II, 593–601.Google Scholar
Wieland, G. Ethica – scientia practica. Die Anfänge der philosophischen Ethik im 13. Jahrhundert. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters, Neue Folge, 21. Münster: Aschendorff, 1981.Google Scholar
Wiggins, D. “Deliberation and Practical Wisdom,” Aristotle’s Ethics, ed. Rorty, A. O.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980, 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolter, A. Duns Scotus on the Will and Morality, ed. Frank, W.. Washington: The Catholic University of America Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Zavattero, I. “Le Prologue de Lectura in Ethicam Veterem du ‘Commentaire de Paris’ (1235–1240),” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales, 77 (2010), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zavattero, I. “Moral and Intellectual Virtues in the Earliest Latin Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics,” Virtue Ethics in the Middle Ages: Commentaries on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, 1200–1250, ed. Bejczy, I.. Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History, 160. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2008, 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar