Adelson, Roger. London and the Invention of the Middle East. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Amineh, Mehdi Parvizi, ed. The Greater Middle East in Global Politics: Social Science Perspectives on the Changing Geography of World Politics. Leiden: Brill, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, James, and Whitmore, John, eds. China's Encounters in the South and Southwest: Reforging the Fiery Frontier. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar

Antholis, William. Inside Out China and India. Washington, DC: Brookings, 2013.Google Scholar

Appadurai, Arjun. “Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy,” in Durham, Meenakshi Gigi and Kellner, Douglas, eds. Media and Cultural Studies: Key Works, rev. edn. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006.Google Scholar

Areguin-Toft, Ivan. How the Weak Win Wars: A Theory of Asymmetric Conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asia Development Bank. Asia 2050: Realizing the Asian Century. Singapore: ADB, 2011.

Axelrod, Robert. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books, 1984.Google Scholar

Ba, Alice. [Re]Negotiating East and Southeast Asia. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael. Dialogues in Arab Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael, and Duvall, Raymond, “Power in International Politics,” International Organization 59 (Winter 2005), pp. 39–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bao, NinhThe Sorrow of War. New York: Riverhead Books, 1993.Google Scholar

Barrow-Green, June. Poincaré and the Three Body Problem. History of Mathematics no. 11, American Mathematical Society, 1997.

Bentham, Jeremy. The Theory of Legislation. London: Trübner, 1887.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. The Hedgehog and the Fox: An Essay on Tolstoy's View of History. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1953.Google Scholar

Binder, Leonard. “The Middle East as a Subordinate International System,” World Politics 10:3 (April 1958), pp. 408–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black Paper: Facts and Evidences of the Acts of Aggression and Annexation of Vietnam against Kampuchea (Phnom Penh: Department of Press and Information of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Democratic Kampuchea, September 1978).

Boserup, Anders, and Mack, Andrew. War Without Weapons: Non-Violence in National Defense. New York: Schocken Books, 1975.Google Scholar

Bowski, William. A Medieval Italian Commune: Siena Under the Nine, 1287–1355. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry, and Wæver, Ole, Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, Barry, and Little, Richard, International Systems in World History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry. “From International System to International Society,” International Organization 47:3 (1993), pp. 327–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calleo, David. The German Problem Reconsidered. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carr, Edward Hallett. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939. London: MacMillan, 1939.Google Scholar

China Statistical Yearbook 2012, accessed electronically by subscription.

Cho, Hui-Wan. Taiwan's Application to GATT/WTO: Significance of Multilateralism for an Unrecognized State. Westport: Praeger, 2002.Google Scholar

Christensen, Thomas J. Deputy Assistant Secretary for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, “A Strong and Moderate Taiwan,” Speech to U.S.-Taiwan Business Council Defense Industry Conference, Annapolis, Maryland, September 11, 2007, www.state.gov/p/eap/rls/rm/2007/91979.htm.Google Scholar

Clausewitz, Carl. Berlin: Dümmers Verlag, 1832.

Conrad, Jeffrey, and Demarest, Arthur, Religion and Empire: The Dynamics of Aztec and Inca Expansionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Copeland, Dale C.The Origins of Major War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Copeland, Dale C.Economic Interdependence and War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Crawford, Timothy. Pivotal Deterrence: Third-Party Statecraft and the Pursuit of Peace. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert. “The Concept of Power,” Behavioral Science 2 (1957), pp. 201–15.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Dardess, John. Governing China 150–1850. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2010.Google Scholar

de Waal, Thomas. The Caucasus: An Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Deudney, David. “‘A Republic for Expansion’: The Roman Constitution and Empire and Balance of Power Theory,” in Kaufman, Stuart, Little, Richard, and Wohlforth, William, eds. The Balance of Power in World History. New York: Palgrave, 2007.Google Scholar

Dittmer, Lowell. “The Strategic Triangle: An Elementary Game-Theoretical Analysis,” World Politics 33:4 (July 1981), pp. 485–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doyle, Michael. Empires. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Eckstein, Alexander. Mediterranean Anarchy: Interstate War and the Rise of Rome. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Eckstein, Alexander. Rome Enters the Greek East. Oxford: Blackwell, 2008.Google Scholar

Eckstein, Harry. “Authority Patterns: A Structural Basis for Political Inquiry,” American Political Science Review 67:4 (1973), pp. 1142–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elvin, Mark. Retreat of the Elephants. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Esherick, Joseph. “China and the World: From Tribute to Treaties to Popular Nationalism,” in Womack, Brantly, ed. China's Rise in Historical Perspective. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield, 2010.Google Scholar

European Union. Consolidated Treaties. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, March 2010.

Fackler, Martin, and Johnston, Ian. “Japan Retreats In Test of Wills with the Chinese,” New York Times, September 25, 2010.

Farrar, Lancelot. Arrogance and Anxiety: The Ambivalence of German Power, 1848–1914. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Fearon, James. “Rationalist Explanations for War,” International Organization 49:3 (Summer 1995), pp. 379–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferguson, Niall. “A World Without Power,” Foreign Policy 143 (July–August 2004)Google Scholar

Fforde, Adam, and Seidel, Katrin. “Cambodia – Donor Playground?: Defeat and Doctrinal Dysfunction in a Hoped-For Client State,” Southeast Asia Research 23:1 (February 2015), pp. 79–99.Google Scholar

Findley, Carter Vaughn. The Turks in World History. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca: Cornell, 1996.Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha. “Legitimacy, Hypocrisy, and the Social Structure of Unipolarity: Why Being a Unipole is Not All It Is Cracked Up to Be,” in Ikenberry, John, Mastanduno, Michael, and Wohlforth, William, eds., International Relations Theory and the Consequences of Unipolarity. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp. 67–98.Google Scholar

Firsing, Scott. “Asymmetry as Context: The Rollercoaster of South Africa-US Relations Post 1994.” South African Journal of International Affairs 19:1 (April 2012), pp. 105–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzgerald, Frances. Fire in the Lake. Boston: Little, Brown, 1972.Google Scholar

Flemes, Daniel, and Wehner, Leslie, “Strategien südamerikaner Sekundärmächte” [Strategies of South American Secondary Powers], GIGA Focus 4, 2012.Google Scholar

Foote, David. “In Search of the Quiet City: Civic Identity and Papal State Building in Fourteenth-Century Orvieto,” in Findlen, Paula, Fontaine, Michelle, and Osheim, Duane, eds., Beyond Florence: The Contours of Medieval and Early Modern Italy (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003), pp. 190–204.Google Scholar

Ford, Peter. “Europe Cringes at Bush ‘Crusade’ against Terrorists,” Christian Science Monitor, September 19, 2001. www.csmonitor.com/2001/0919/p12s2-woeu.html

Franklin, Benjamin. Poor Richard's Almanack 1743.

Fray, Keith. “China's Leap Forward: Overtaking the US as World's Biggest Economy,” Financial Times, October 8, 2014.

Freeman, Chas W. Jr.Interesting Times: China, America, and the Shifting Balance of Prestige. Charlottesville: Just World Books, 2013.Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon L.The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Gallarotti, Giulio. Cosmopolitan Power in International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallarotti, Giulio. The Power Curse: Influence and Illusion in World Politics. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2010.Google Scholar

Gelb, Leslie. “US Aides See Need for Big Effort to Avert Rebel Victory in Salvador,” New York Times, April 22, 1983.

The Genron NPO, “On the Results of the 7th Japan-China Joint Opinion Survey,” www.genron-npo.net/english/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=24:on-the-results-of-the-7th-japan-china-joint-opinion-survey&catid=1:advocacy&Itemid=3.

Geyer, David. “The Missing Link: Henry Kissinger and the Back Channel Negotiations on Berlin,” in Geyer, David and Schaefer, Berndt, eds., American Détente and German Ostpolitik, 1969-1972. Washington: German Historical Institute, 2004.Google Scholar

Gilpin, Robert. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goemans, H. E.War and Punishment. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goertz, Gary, and Diehl, Paul F., “Enduring Rivalries: Theoretical Constructs and Empirical Patterns” International Studies Quarterly 37:2 (June 1993), pp. 147–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, Melvyn. A History of Modern Tibet, Volume 2: The Calm Before the Storm: 1950–1955. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Green, Louis. Castruccio Castracani. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte [lectures on the philosophy of history], ed. Gans, Eduard, Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1840.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O.National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade. Berkeley: University of California Press, expanded edn. 1980; orig 1945.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan (Andrew Crooke, at the Green Dragon in St. Paul's Churchyard, 1651). Available online from Project Gutenberg.

Hoffman, Elizabeth. American Umpire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hui, Victoria Tin-bor. “The Triumph of Domination in the Ancient Chinese System,” in Kaufman, Little, and Wohlforth, , eds., The Balance of Power in World History. New York: Palgrave, 2007, pp. 122–47.Google Scholar

Ikenberry, G. John, Matanduno, Michael, Wohlforth, William, eds., International Relations Theory and the Consequences of Unipolarity. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ikenberry, G. John. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Immerman, Richard. The CIA in Guatemala: The Foreign Policy of Intervention. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Jervis, Robert. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Jervis, Robert. “Cooperation under the Security Dilemma,” World Politics 30:2 (January 1978), pp. 167–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jervis, Robert. “Improving the Intelligence Process,” in Maurer, Alfred, Tunstall, Marion, and Keagle, James, Intelligence Policy and Process. Boulder: Westview Press, 1985, pp. 113–24.Google Scholar

Jervis, Robert. System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Jervis, Robert. Why Intelligence Fails: Lessons from the Iranian Revolution and the Iraq War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Johnston, Alastair Iain. “How New and Assertive is China's New Assertiveness?” International Security 37:4 (Spring 2013), pp. 7–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Charles A. “Hierarchy and Resistance in the American State-Systems, 1400–1800 CE,” in Kaufman, Stuart, Little, Richard, and Wohlforth, William, eds., The Balance of Power in World History. New York: Palgrave, 2007, pp. 176–98.Google Scholar

Jones, Claire, and Giles, Chris, “WTO and OECD Add Value to Trade debate,” Financial Times, January 16, 2013.

Judt, Tony. Postwar: A History of Europe since 1945. New York: Penguin, 2005.Google Scholar

Kahler, Miles. “Rising Powers and Global Governance: Negotiating Change in a Resilient Status Quo,” International Affairs, May 2013.

Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos, “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk”, Econometrica XLVII (1979), 263–91.Google Scholar

Kang, David C. “Getting Asia Wrong: The Need for New Analytical Frameworks,” International Security 27:4 (Spring 2003), pp. 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kang, David C. “Hierarchy, Balancing, and Empirical Puzzles in Asian International Relations,” International Security 28:3 (Winter 2003–04), p. 170.Google Scholar

Kang, David C. “Hierarchy in Asian International Relations: 1300 to 1900,” Asian Security 1:1 (Winter 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kang, David C.China Rising: Peace, Power, and Order in East Asia. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Kang, David C.East Asia Before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter, ed., The Culture of National Security. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter, “Regionalism in Comparative Perspective,” Cooperation and Conflict 31:2 (1996), pp. 123–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, Paul. The Rise of the Anglo-German Antagonism. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1980, pp. 68–9.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Paul. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. New York: Random House, 1987.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert, and Nye, Joseph, Power and Interdependence, Third Edition. New York: Longman, 2001.Google Scholar

Khong, Yuen Foong. “The American Tributary System,” Chinese Journal of International Politics 6:1 (Spring 2013), pp. 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kindleberger, Charles. The World in Depression: 1929–1939. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Kindleberger, Charles. World Economic Primacy, 1500–1990. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Knight, Jack. Institutions and Social Conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lake, David A.Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Lam, Truong Buu. Patterns of Vietnamese Response to Foreign Intervention, 1858-1900. Yale University Southeast Asia Studies, Monograph Series No. 11, 1967.Google Scholar

Legro, Jeffrey W, and Moravcsik, Andrew, “Is Anybody Still a Realist?” International Security 24:2 (Fall 1999), pp. 5–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Legro, Jeffrey W.Rethinking the World: Great Power Strategies and International Order. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Lenin, V. I.Imperialism, The Highest Stage of Capitalism (1916), in Selected Works of Lenin, vol. 5. New York: International Publishers, nd, pp. 3–122.Google Scholar

Lieberthal, Kenneth, and Jisi, Wang, Addressing US-China Strategic Distrust. Washington: Brookings, 2012.Google Scholar

Lin, Syaru Shirley. “Bridging the Chinese National Identity Gap: Alternative Identities in Hong Kong and Taiwan,” Joint US-Korea Academic Studies 35 (2014), pp. 113–132.Google Scholar

Lippmann, Walter. “A Mediator Is Needed,” New York Herald Tribune, September 23, 1958.

Lustick, Ian. “The Absence of Middle Eastern Great Powers: Political ‘Backwardness’ in Historical Perspective,” International Organization 51:4 (Autumn 1997), pp. 653–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luttwak, Edward. The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Lynch, Allen, and Lukics, Reneo, Europe from the Balkans to the Urals: The Disintegration of Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Lynch, Allen. The Cold War is Over—Again. Boulder: Westview Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Lyska, George. Nations in Alliance: The Limits of Interdependence. Baltimore Johns Hopkins University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Macdonald, Paul. Networks of Domination: The Social Foundations of Peripheral Conquest in International Politics. New York: Oxford, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Machiavelli, Niccolo. The Prince, tr. Marriott, W. K.. London: Dent, 1908. Available online at www.constitution.org/mac/prince00.htm.Google Scholar

Mack, Andrew. “Why Big Nations Lose Small Wars,” World Politics 37:2 (January 1975), pp. 175–200.Google Scholar

MacMillan, Margaret. The War that Ended Peace. New York: Random House, 2013.Google Scholar

Mahan, A. T. “The Persian Gulf in International Relations,” National Review (London), September 1902, pp. 27–8.Google Scholar

Manchester, William. The Last Lion. London: Sphere Books, 1984, pp. 568–70.Google Scholar

Mao, Zedong. “Problems of Strategy in Guerilla War against Japan, (1938)”. In Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung, vol 2. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press, 1965, pp. 79–112.Google Scholar

Mao, Zedong. “Problems of Strategy in China's Revolutionary War (December 1936),” in Schram, Stuart, ed., Mao's Road to Power: Revolutionary Writings 1912–1949, vol. V. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1992, p. 499.Google Scholar

Maoz, Zeev, and Mor, Ben D., Bound by Struggle: The Strategic Evolution of Enduring International Rivalries. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mearsheimer, John. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton, 2001.Google Scholar

Merom, Gil. How Democracies Lose Small Wars. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moïse, Ed. “The Order of Battle Dispute and the Westmoreland Lawsuit,” www.clemson.edu/caah/history/facultypages/EdMoise/ob.html.

Monteiro, Nuno. Theory of Unipolar Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mueller, John. Retreat from Doomsday: The Obsolescence of Major War. New York: Basic Books, 1989.Google Scholar

Murphy, Craig. The International Organization For Standardization (ISO): Global Governance Through Voluntary Consensus. Milton Park: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar

Nabers, Dirk. “Power, Leadership and Hegemony in International Politics,” Review of International Studies 36 (2010), p. 943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

National Intelligence Council. Global Trends 2030: Alternate Worlds. Washington: NIC, December 2012.

NATO 2020. Assured Security; Dynamic Engagement. May 2010. http://carnegieendowment.org/pdf/20100517_100517_expertsreport.pdf.

Naughton, Barry. “The Dynamics of China's Reform-Era Economy,” in Womack, Brantly, ed., China's Rise in Historical Perspective. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2010.Google Scholar

Nillson, Niklas. “Georgia's Conflicts: Abkhazia and South Ossetia,” in Cornell, Svante and Jonsson, Michael, eds., Conflict, Crime, and the State in Post-Communist Eurasia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014, pp. 103–28Google Scholar

Ninth Japan-China Public Opinion Poll. Analysis Report on the Comparative Data. Tokyo: Genron NPO and China Daily, August 12, 2013.

Nye, Joseph, and Keohane, Robert, Power and InterdependenceNew York: Harper Collins, 1989.Google Scholar

Nye, Joseph. Bound to Lead. New York: Basic Books, 1990.Google Scholar

Nye, Joseph. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs, 2004.Google Scholar

Oppenheim, Felix. Political Concepts: A Reconstruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Organski, A. F. K.World Politics, New York: Knopf, 1968.Google Scholar

Organski, A. F. K., and Kugler, Jacek. The War Ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Osheim, Duane. An Italian Lordship: The Bishopric of Lucca in the Late Middle Age. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Owen, John M. IVLiberal Peace, Liberal War: American Politics and International Security. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Owen, John M. IVThe Clash of Ideas in World Politics: Transnational Networks, States, and Regime Change, 1510–2010. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pape, Robert. “The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism.” American Political Science Review. 97:3 (August 2003), pp. 343–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paul, T. V.Asymmetric Conflicts: War Initiation by Weaker Powers. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peace of Constance, available online at www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/barbarossa-lombards.asp.

Piketty, Thomas. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Harvard, University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Pillar, Paul. “Intelligence, Policy, and the War in Iraq,” Foreign Affairs (March–April, 2006).

Pillar, Paul. Negotiating Peace. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pinker, Stephen. “A History of Violence,” New Republic 236:12 (March 19 2007), pp. 18–21.Google Scholar

Powell, Robert. “Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory,” American Political Science Review 85:4 (December 1991), pp. 701–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, Robert D. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games.” International Organization 42 (Summer 1988), pp. 427–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quandt, William. Revolution and Political Leadership: Algeria 1954–1968. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Quandt, William. Between Ballots and Bullets: Algeria's Transition from Authoritarianism. Washington: Brookings, 1998.Google Scholar

Race, Jeffrey. War Comes to Long An: Revolutionary Conflict in a Vietnamese Province. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Ramazani, Rouhollah. The Foreign Policy of Iran, 1500–1941. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice, rev. edn.Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Rawski, Evelyn. “Chinese Strategy and Security Issues in Historical Perspective,” in Womack, Brantly, ed. China's Rise in Historical Perspective. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield, 2010, pp. 63–88.Google Scholar

Reed, William. “Information, Power, and War,” American Political Science Review 97:4 (November 2003), pp. 633–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reiter, Dan. “Exploring the Bargaining Theory of War,” Perspectives on Politics 1:1 (March 2003), pp. 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, Roberto, and Tokatlian, Juan, “Implications of the Global and Regional Changes for Argentina's Foreign Relations,” Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research 19:2 (2013), pp. 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schattschneider, E. E.The Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1960.Google Scholar

Schelling, Thomas. Arms and Influence. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Schoppa, Leonard. Bargaining with Japan: What American Pressure Can and Cannot Do. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Schroeder, Paul. The Transformation of European Politics, 1763-1848. London: Clarendon Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Schroeder, Paul. “Napoleon's Foreign Policy: A Criminal Enterprise,” in Systems, Stability, and Statecraft. New York: Palgrave 2004, pp. 23–36.Google Scholar

Schroeder, Paul. “The Mirage of Empire Versus the Promise of Hegemony,” in Systems, Stability, and Statecraft. New York: Palgrave 2004, pp. 297–306.Google Scholar

Scott, James C.The Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Sechser, Todd. “Goliath's Curse: Coercive Threats and Asymmetric Power,” International Organization 64:4 (2010), pp. 627–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Denis Mack. Modern Italy: A Political History. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Rupert. The Utility of Force: The Art of War in the Modern World. New York: Knopf, 2005.Google Scholar

Snyder, Glenn. Alliance Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Snyder, Jack. Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Stein, Arthur. “When Misperception Matters,” World Politics 34:4 (July 1982), pp. 506–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stephan, Paul. “Symmetry and Selectivity: What Happens in International Law When the World Changes,” Chicago Journal of International Law 10:1 (2009), pp. 91–123.Google Scholar

Swaine, Michael. America's Challenge: Engaging Rising China in the Twenty-first Century. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2011, p. 49.Google Scholar

Swaine, Michael. “Chinese Views Regarding the Senkaku/Diaoyu Dispute,” China Leadership Monitor 41, June 2013.Google Scholar

Taleb, Nassim Nicolas. Black Swan, New York: Penguin, 2010.Google Scholar

Tammen, Ronald, et al., Power Transitions: Strategies for the Twenty-first Century. New York: Chatham House, 2000.Google Scholar

Taubman, Philip. “Analyst Said to have Quit CIA in Dispute,” New York Times, September 28, 1984.

Taylor, A. J. P.The Struggle for Mastery in Europe, 1848–1918. London: Clarendon, 1954.Google Scholar

Taylor, Keith. Birth of Vietnam. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Tetlock, Philip. Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know?Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Thompson, William R. “Principal Rivalries.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 39:2 (June 1995), pp. 195–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Treitschke, Heinrich. Politik 2 vols. (Leipzig: Hirtzel, 1897–8)Google Scholar

Tsou, Tang. The Embroilment over Quemoy: Mao, Chiang, and Dulles. University of Utah Institute of International Studies International Study Paper no. 2, 1959.Google Scholar

US Energy Information Administration. Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources: An Assessment of 137 Shale Formations in 41 Countries Outside the United States. Washington: US Department of Energy, June 2013.

Vasquez, John. The War Puzzle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vuving, Alexander. “How Soft Power Works,” paper presented at the APSA annual meeting, September 2009.

Walt, Stephen. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Waltz, Kenneth. “The Origins of War in Neorealist Theory,” Journal of Indisciplinary History 18:4 (Spring 1988), p. 620.Google Scholar

Waltz, Kenneth. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979.Google Scholar

Ward, Karen. The World in 2050. London: HSBC Global Research, January 2011.Google Scholar

Watson, Adam. The Limits of Independence. New York: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar

Weber, Max. “Die sozialen Gründe des Untergangs der antiken Kultur” (1896), in Winckelmann, Johannes, ed., Max Weber: Soziologie, Weltgeschichtliche Analysen, Politik. Stuttgart: Kröner, 1968, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar

Wendt, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weyl, Hermann. Symmetry. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wight, MartinPower Politics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1978.Google Scholar

Womack, Brantly, and Wu, Yu-Shan, “Asymmetric Triangles and the Washington-Beijing-Taipei Relationship,” in Womack, Brantly, China among Unequals: Asymmetric Foreign Relations in Asia. Singapore: World Scientific, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Womack, Brantly. “The Party and the People: Revolutionary and Post-Revolutionary Politics in China and Vietnam,” World Politics 39:4 (July 1987), pp. 479–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Womack, Brantly. “Asymmetry and Systemic Misperception: The Cases of China, Vietnam and Cambodia during the 1970s.” Journal of Strategic Studies 26:2 (June, 2003), pp. 91–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Womack, Brantly. China and Vietnam: The Politics of Asymmetry. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Womack, Brantly. “China between Region and World,” China Journal 61 (January 2009), pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Womack, Brantly. China Among Unequals: Asymmetric Foreign Relations in Asia. Singapore: World Scientific Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Womack, Brantly. “The Spratlys: From Dangerous Ground to Apple of Discord,” Contemporary South East Asia 33:3 (2011), pp. 370–87.Google Scholar

Womack, Brantly. “Structure and Culture in China's Relations with Southern Neighbors,” in Anderson, James and Whitmore, John, eds., China's Encounters in the South and Southwest: Reforging the Fiery Frontier. Leiden: Brill, 2014, pp. 395–405.Google Scholar

Womack, Brantly. “China's Future in a Multi-Nodal World Order,” Pacific Affairs 87:2 (June 2014), pp. 265–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Womack, Brantly. “China Beyond Status Quo,” Chinese Journal of International Politics 8:2 (Summer 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Womack, John. Zapata and the Mexican Revolution. New York: Knopf, 1969.Google Scholar

Woodside, Alexander. “The Center and the Borderlands in Chinese Political Theory.” In The Chinese State at the Borders, Lary, Diana, ed. Vancouver: UBC Press.

World Bank. China 2030: Building a Modern, Harmonious, and Creative High-Income Society. Conference Edition. Washington: World Bank, 2012.

Xenophon, , Cyropaedia, 2 vols, tr. Miller, Walter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press: Loeb Classical Library, 1914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zacher, Marc. “The Territorial Integrity Norm: International Boundaries and the Use of Force,” International Organization 55:2 (Spring 2001), pp. 215–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhou, Fangyin. “Equilibrium Analysis of the Tributary System,” Chinese Journal of International Politics 4:2 (2011), pp. 147–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

老子道德经 [Lao Zi's Classic of the Way and Virtue]. Beijing: Beijing University Press, 1995, pp. 246–49.