Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Audio-visual Coverage of CourtsA Comparative Analysis, pp. 425 - 485Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008
References
Access to Justice Advisory Committee, Access to Justice: An Action Plan (Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service, 1994)
Adam, G. Stuart, ‘The Charter and the Role of the Media: a Journalist's Perspective’ in and (eds.), The Media, the Courts and the Charter (Toronto, Carswell, 1986), p. 39Google Scholar
(ed.), Freedom of Expression and the Criticism of Judges: a Comparative Study of European Legal Standards (Aldershot, Dartmouth, 2000)Google Scholar
Administrative Office of the Courts, Cameras in the Courtroom: Report on Rule 980 (San Francisco, Judicial Council of California, May 2000)
Administrative Office of the Courts of the State of California, Task Force on Photographing, Recording and Broadcasting in the Courtroom, Report Summary (San Francisco, Judicial Council of California, 1996)
Administrative Office of the Courts Research and Planning Unit, Cameras in the Courtroom (San Francisco, Judicial Council of California, 2000)
Advisory Committee on Cameras in the Courtroom, Final Statistical Report: Cameras in the Courtroom in Nevada (Williamsburg, VA, National Center for State Courts, 1981)
, and , Media Coverage of Court Proceedings, Discussion Document (Wellington, Courts Consultative Committee, 1998)Google Scholar
, and ,The Impact of Television, Radio and Still Photography Coverage of Court Proceedings, Final Report, Report prepared for the Department for Courts (Wellington, Courts Consultative Committee, April 1998)
, and , The Impact of Television, Radio and Still Photography Coverage of Court Proceedings, Interim Report One, Report prepared for the Department for Courts, Department of Human Resource Management Faculty of Business Studies, Massey University (Wellington, Courts Consultative Committee, October 1996)
American Bar Association, Annual Report of the American Bar Association (Chicago, IL, Headquarters Office, 1936)
American Bar Association,Annual Report of the American Bar Association (Chicago, IL, Headquarters Office, 1937)
American Bar Association,Annual Report of the American Bar Association (Chicago, IL, Headquarters Office, 1939)
American Bar Association,Annual Report including Proceedings of the 150th Annual Meeting (Chicago, IL, Headquarters Office, 1982)
American Bar Association Commission on Separation of Powers and Judicial Independence, An Independent Judiciary Report of the American Bar Association; Australian Bar Association Commission on Separation of Powers and Judicial Independence (Washington, American Bar Association, 1997) www.abanet.org/govaffairs/judiciary/report.html at 25 April 2007
, ‘Lessons from an Impeachment’ in The Courts and the Media (Rushcutters Bay, NSW, Halstead, 1999), p. 176Google Scholar
Annual Report of the Proceedings of the Judicial Conference of the United States, March 8–9 (Washington, DC, US GPO, 1962)
Australian Law Reform Commission, Contempt: Disruption, Disobedience and Deliberate Interference, Discussion Paper 27 (Sydney, Australian Law Reform Commission, 1986)
Australian Law Reform Commission,Contempt, Report No. 35 (Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service, 1987)
Australian Law Reform Commission,Technology: What it Means for Federal Dispute Resolution, Issues Paper 23 (Sydney, Australian Law Reform Commission, 1998)
, Cameras and Recorders in Arizona's Trial Courts (Williamsburg, VA, National Center for State Courts, 1983)Google Scholar
Barber, Susanna, ‘News Cameras in the Courtroom: A Review of the Empirical Literature’ in (ed.), Progress in Communication Sciences (Norwood, NJ, Ablex, 1986), p. 177Google Scholar
Beckton, Clare, ‘Freedom of the Press in Canada: Prior Restraint’ in and (eds.), The Media, the Courts and the Charter (Toronto, Carswell, 1986), p. 119Google Scholar
Biondi, Andrea, ‘TV Cameras Access into the Courtroom: a Comparative Note’ in et al. (eds.), The Yearbook of Media and Entertainment Law 1996 (Oxford, Clarendon, 1996), p. 133Google Scholar
Blackshield, Tony and Williams, George, Australian Constitutional Law and Theory (3rd edn, Annandale, NSW, Federation Press, 2002)
, Justice and the Media: Reconciling Fair Trials and a Free Press (Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum, 1997)Google Scholar
Calamai, Peter, ‘The Media and the Court's Public Accountability’ in (ed.), Brian Dickson at the Supreme Court of Canada 1973–1990 (Winnipeg, Canadian Legal History Project, 1998)Google Scholar
, The Supreme Court and the Mass Media: Selected Cases, Summaries, and Analyses (New York, Praeger, 1990)Google Scholar
,Free Press v. Fair Trial: Supreme Court Decisions since 1807 (Westport, CT, London, Praeger, 1994)Google Scholar
, Jurismania: the Madness of American Law (New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Canadian Judicial Council, Annual Report 2000–01 (Ottowa, Ontario, Canadian Judicial Council, 2001), http://cjc-ccm.gc.ca/cmslib/general/CJC2001-2002_E.pdf at 25 April 2007
Canadian Judicial Council,Annual Report 2001–02 (Ottowa, Ontario, Canadian Judicial Council, 2002), http://cjc-ccm.gc.ca/cmslib/general/CJC2001-2002_E.pdf at 25 April 2007
Canadian Judicial Council,Annual Report 2002–03 (Ottowa, Ontario, Canadian Judicial Council, 2003), http://cjc-ccm.gc.ca/cmslib/general/CJC2002-2003_E.pdf at 25 April 2007
, and , The First Amendment and the Fourth Estate (8th edn, New York, Foundation Press, 2001)Google Scholar
, and , Managing Prejudicial Publicity (Sydney, NSW, Law and Justice Foundation of NSW on behalf of the University of NSW and the Justice Research Centre 2001)Google Scholar
(ed.), The Press on Trial: Crimes and Trials as Media Events (Westport, CT, London, Greenwood Press, 1997)Google Scholar
and , Cameras in the Courtroom: Television and the Pursuit of Justice (Jefferson, NC, London, McFarland, 1998)Google Scholar
Courts Administration Authority, Web Page Feasibility Study (Adelaide, Courts Administration Authority, 26 June 1997)
Courts Consultative Committee, Agenda Item 12 Evaluation of the Televising Court Proceedings Pilot Project (New ZealandMinistry of Justice, 1995)
Courts Consultative Committee,Media Coverage of Court Proceedings, Discussion Document (New ZealandMinistry of Justice, 1998)
Cram, Ian, ‘Section 4(2) Postponement Orders: Media Reports of Court Proceedings under the Contempt of Court Australian Capital Territory 1981’ in et al (eds.), The Yearbook of Media and Entertainment Law (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Department for Constitutional Affairs, Broadcasting Courts: a Consultation by the Department for Constitutional Affairs (London, Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2004), www.dca.gov.uk/consult/courts/broadcasting-cp28-04.htm at 25 April 2007
Department for Courts, Media Coverage of Court Proceedings: a Summary Report (Wellington, UMR Insight Ltd, 1998)
Eichelbaum, Sir Thomas, Report: Televising Court Proceedings: the New Zealand Experiment (New Zealand, Courts Consultative Committee, September 1995)
Ernest Short and Associates Inc., Evaluation of California's Experiment with Extended Media Coverage of Courts (Williamsburg, VA, National Center for State Courts, 1981)
and (eds.), Justice and Technology in Europe: How ICT is Changing the Judicial Business (The Hague, London, Kluwer International, 2001)Google Scholar
Federal Court of Australia, Annual Report 1994–1995 (Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service, 1995)
Federal Court of Canada, Annual Report (Toronto, R. De Boo, 1994)
, Human Rights in Australia, Treaties, Statutes and Cases (Chatswood, NSW, LexisNexis Butterworths, 2003)Google Scholar
and (eds), Covering the Courts: Free Press, Fair Trials, and Journalistic Performance (New Brunswick, NJ, London, Transaction Publishers, 1998)Google Scholar
Glasbeek, H. J., ‘Comment: Entrenchment of Freedom of Speech for the Press – Fettering of Freedom of Speech of the People’ in and (eds.), The Media, the Courts and the Charter (Toronto, Carswell, 1986), p. 100Google Scholar
, TV or Not TV: Television, Justice, and the Courts (New York, New York University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
, Report of the Courts Consultative Committee for the Year Ending 31 December 1995 (New Zealand Ministry of Justice, 1996)Google Scholar
, and , Australian Constitutional Law Materials and Commentary (7th edn, Chatswood, NSW, LexisNexis Butterworths, 2004)Google Scholar
Henningham, John, ‘The High Court and the Media’ in (ed.), Centenary Essays for the High Court of Australia (Chatswood, NSW, LexisNexis Butterworths, 2004)Google Scholar
Henry, Daniel J., ‘Electronic Public Access to Court: a Proposal for its Implementation Today’ in and (eds.), The Media, the Courts and the Charter (Toronto, Carswell, 1986), p. 441Google Scholar
Henry, Daniel J.,‘Electronic Public Access to Court: an Idea whose Time Has Come’ in , and (eds.), Open Justice: La Transparence dans le Système Judiciaire (Toronto, Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice, 1995), p. 389Google Scholar
Himmelstein, Hal, ‘Television News and the Television Documentary’ in (ed.), Television: the Critical View (4th edn, New York, Oxford University Press, 1987)Google Scholar
, The Impact of Television, Radio and Still Photography Coverage of Court Proceedings, Interim Report One (New Zealand, 1998)Google Scholar
House of Representatives Select Committee on Televising the House of Representatives, Parliament of Australia, The Eyes have It!: Inquiry into the Televising of the House of Representatives and its Committees (Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service, 1991)
House of Representatives Standing Committee on the Televising of the House of Representatives, To See or Not to See – This is the Answer: Review of Arrangements for the Televising of the House of Representatives (Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service, 1993)
Hutton, Rt Hon. Lord, Investigation into the Circumstances Surrounding the Death of Dr David Kelly (Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2003) www.the-hutton-inquiry.org.UK at 25 April 2007
Information Service National Center for State Courts, Summary of TV Cameras in the State Courts (Williamsburg, VA, National Center for State Courts, 1995)
, Television in New Zealand Courts: the Experience So Far (Supreme Court of Victoria, 1996)Google Scholar
, Open Justice: a Critique of the Public Trial (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Molly Treadway, Electronic Media Coverage of Courtroom Proceedings: an Evaluation of the Pilot Program in Six District Courts and Two Courts of Appeals, Report of the Federal Judicial Center to the Committee on Administrative and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States (Washington, DC, 4 November 1993)
Johnson, Molly Treadway,Electronic Media Coverage of Courtroom Proceedings: Effects on Witnesses and Jurors, Supplemental Report of the Federal Judicial Center to the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management, (Washington, DC, 18 January 1994)
and , Electronic Media Coverage of Federal Civil Proceedings: an Evaluation of the Pilot Program in Six District Courts and Two Courts of Appeals (Washington, DC, Federal Judicial Center, 1994)Google Scholar
Joint Select Committee on Certain Aspects of the Operation and Interpretation of the Family Law Australian Capital Territory, The Family Law Australian Capital Territory 1975: Aspects of its Operation and Interpretation (Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service, January 1993)
Judicial Council of California, Report by Task Force on Photographing, Recording and Broadcasting in the Courtroom (San Francisco, Judicial Council of California, February 1996)
Judicial Council of California,Cameras in the Courtroom: Report on Rule 980 (San Francisco, Judicial Council of California, May 2000)
, Murder, Courts, and the Press: Issues in Free Press/Fair Trial (rev edn, Carbondale, Southern Illinois University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
, The Provision of Court Services for Court Customers in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom: a Literature Review and Annotated Bibliography (New ZealandMinistry of Justice, 1996)Google Scholar
Kriven, Sylvia, Quo Vadis? A Report on a Visit to the United States of America, 2 July to 17 July 2001, and Recommendations for Change in the Communications Branch of the Courts Administration Authority (South Australia Courts Administration Authority, August 2001)
Lamek, P. S. A., ‘Comment: a Middle Way’ in and (eds.), The Media, the Courts and the Charter (Toronto, Carswell, 1986), p. 499Google Scholar
Law Reform Commission of Canada, Public and Media Access to the Criminal Process, Working Paper 56 (Ottowa, LRCC, 1987)
Law Reform Commission of Ireland, Report on Contempt of Court (Oxford, Professional Books, 1994)
Law Reform Commission of New South Wales, Proceedings of Court and Commissions Television Filming, Sound Recording and Public Broadcasting, Sketches and Photographs (Sydney, LRCNSW, 1984)
Law Reform Commission of Western Australia, Review of the Law of Contempt, Report No. 93 (Perth, WA, LRCWA, 2003)
Lederman, Sidney N., O'Kelly, Patrick and Grottenhaler, Margaret, ‘Confidentiality of News Sources’ in and (eds.), The Media, the Courts and the Charter (Toronto, Carswell, 1986), p. 227Google Scholar
Lepofsky, David, ‘Cameras in the Courtroom: Not Without My Consent’ in , and (eds.), Open Justice: La Transparence dans le Système Judiciaire (Toronto, Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice, 1995), p. 333Google Scholar
Linden, Allen M., ‘Limitations on Media Coverage of Legal Proceedings: a Critique and Some Proposals for Reform’ in and (eds.), The Media, the Courts and the Charter (Toronto, Carswell, 1986), p. 301Google Scholar
and , Crime and Local Television News: Dramatic, Breaking, and Live from the Scene (Mahwah, NJ, London, Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002)Google Scholar
, Continental Divide: the Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada (New York, London, Routledge, 1990)Google Scholar
Manson, Allen, ‘Freedom of the Press and Juries, Prisons and Prisoners’ in and (eds.), The Media, the Courts and the Charter (Toronto, Carswell, 1986), p. 355Google Scholar
Martin, Robert, ‘Contempt of Court: the Effect of the Charter’ in and (eds.), The Media, the Courts and the Charter (Toronto, Carswell, 1986), p. 207Google Scholar
Mason, Paul, Report on the Impact of Cameras at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (The Hague, Southampton, ICTY and Centre for Media and Justice, 2000)
Media Coverage of Court Proceedings Pilot Evaluation Committee, Media Coverage of Court Proceedings, Introduction and Summary of Research Findings (New Zealand, Courts Consultative Committee, August 1998)
Media in Courts Monitoring Committee, Expanded Media Coverage of Court Proceedings, a Consultation Paper (New Zealand, 2001)
, No Sense of Place: the Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior (New York, Oxford University Press, 1985)Google Scholar
et al., Managing Notorious Trials (2nd edn, Williamsburg, VA, National Center for State Courts, 1998)Google Scholar
and , Law of Mass Communications: Freedom and Control of Print and Broadcast Media (4th edn, Mineola, NY, Foundation Press, 1982)Google Scholar
New South Wales Law Reform Commission, Community Law Reform Program: Proceedings of Courts and Commissions Television Filming, Sound Recording and Public Broadcasting, Sketches and Photographs, Issues Paper 4 (Sydney, Government Printer, 1984)
New South Wales Law Reform Commission,Community Law Reform Program: Sound Recording of Proceedings of Courts and Commissions: The Media, Authors and Parties, Report No. 39 (Sydney, NSWeekly Law Reports (UK)C, 1984)
New South Wales Law Reform Commission,Contempt by Publication, Discussion Paper 43 (Redfern, NSW, NSWeekly Law Reports (UK)C, 2000)
New South Wales Law Reform Commission,Contempt by Publication, Report No. 100 (Sydney, NSWeekly Law Reports (UK)C, 2003)
New York State Committee to Review Audio Visual Coverage of Court Proceedings, An Open Courtroom: Cameras in New York Courts (Bronx, NY, Fordham University Press, 1997)
New York State Defenders Association, The Intrusion of Cameras in New York's Criminal Courts: a Report by the Public Defense Backup Center (New York, New York State Defenders’ Association, 1989)
New York State Defenders Association,Cameras in New York Courtrooms White Paper (New York, New York State Defenders’ Association, 1999), www.nysda.org/Hot_Topics/Cameras_in_the_Courts/03_Cameras_in_NY_Courts_NYSDA_1999_.pdf at 25 April 2007
New York Times, 36 Days: the Complete Chronicle of the 2000 Presidential Election Crisis (New York, Times Books, 2001)
New Zealand Courts Consultative Committee, Report of the Courts Consultative Committee for the Year Ending 31 December 1995 (New Zealand, 1995)
New Zealand Law Commission, Juries in Criminal Trials, Report No. 69 (Wellington, Law Commission, 2001), www.lawcom.govt.nz at 25 April 2007
Newfoundland Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Criminal Justice System, Hughes Inquiry (St John's, Newfoundland, Office of the Queen's Printer, June 1989)
Nicol, Andrew and Rogers, Heather, ‘Media Reporting Restrictions’ in et al. (eds.), The Yearbook of Media and Entertainment Law (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1996), p. 349Google Scholar
Nova Scotia Royal Commission on the Donald Marshall Jr Prosecution, Marshall Report (Halifax, NS, NSRC, December 1989)
Ontario Bench and Bar Council, Television in the Courts: Background Paper 6 (Ontario, September 1983)
, Courts and the Public (Carlton South, Victoria, Australian Institute of Judicial Administration, 1998)Google Scholar
Parliament of New South Wales, Inquiry into a Proposal for the Televising of Public Hearings of the Independent Commission against Corruption (Sydney, Parliament of New South Wales, 1990)
Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, To See or Not to See, This is the Answer (Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service, 1993)
Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia,Radio and Television Broadcasting of Parliamentary Proceedings (Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service, 1995)
Parliament of Victoria, Law Reform Committee, Technology and the Law (Melbourne, Government Printer, 1999)
Phillips, Bruce, Report on the Use of Broadcasting Equipment in the Federal Court of Australia (Federal Court of Australia, December 1993–December 1997)
Phillips, Bruce,‘Television in the Federal Court of Australia 1994–2004’, paper prepared in response to November 2004 ‘Broadcasting Courts: A Consultation by the Department for Constitutional Affairs: Federal Court of Australia’ (24 December 2004)
, The Courts and the News Media (6th edn, San Francisco, CA, California Judges Association, 1993)Google Scholar
Proulx, Michel, ‘Comment: No Cameras Please’ in and (eds.), The Media, the Courts and the Charter (Toronto, Carswell, 1986), p. 491Google Scholar
Public Affairs Committee of the General Council of the Bar, Televising the Courts: Report of a Working Party of the Public Affairs Committee of the General Council of the Bar (London, Bar Council of England and Wales, May 1989)
, and , The Last Word: Media Coverage of the Supreme Court of Canada (Vancouver, UBC Press, 2006)Google Scholar
and , Communication and Litigation: Case Studies of Famous Trials (Carbondale, Southern Illinois University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, Inquiry into the Rights and Obligations of the Media, Part IV of a Submission by Communications Law Centre: ‘The Right to Privacy and the Right to Know’ (Australia, 1995)
Short, Ernest and Associates, Evaluation of California's Experiment with Extended Media Coverage of Courts (Williamsburg, VA, National Center for State Courts, September 1981)
Small, Allison L., Cameras in the Courtroom: Pilot Project Preliminary Report and Survey Results, memorandum to Court's Committee on Cameras in the Courtroom, Canadian Federal Court of Appeals (6 March 1997)
Stephen, Sir Ninian, ‘Televising of Proceedings’ in , and (eds.), The Oxford Companion to the High Court of Australia (South Melbourne, Vic., Oxford University Press, 2001), p. 663Google Scholar
, Electronic Media Coverage of Courts: a Report Prepared for the Federal Court of Australia (Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia, 1998)Google Scholar
Stepniak, Daniel,‘British Justice: Not Suitable for Public Viewing?’ in (ed.), Criminal Visions: Media Representations of Crime and Justice (Cullompton, Willan, 2003), p. 254Google Scholar
Stepniak, Daniel,‘Cameras in Courts: for Whose Benefit?’ in (ed.), Legal Explorations: Essays in Honour of Professor Michael Chesterman (Pyrmont, NSW, Lawbook Co., 2003), p. 239Google Scholar
and , Cameras in State Courts: a Comparative Examination of Experimental Versus Permanent Usage by State (American Political Science Association, 1994)Google Scholar
, The Watchful Eye: American Justice in the Age of the Television Trial (Westport, CT, Praeger, 1994)Google Scholar
, ‘Public Perceptions of the Civil Justice System’ in Ontario Law Reform Commission, Rethinking Civil Justice: Research Studies for the Civil Justice Review (Toronto, Ont., Ontario Law Reform Commission, 1996)Google Scholar
, Best Practices for Television Journalists: a Handbook for Reporters, Producers, Videographers, News Directors and Other Broadcast Professionals on How to Be Fair to the Public (Nashville, TN, Freedom Forum, 2000)Google Scholar
, Seeking Civil Justice: a Survey of People's Needs and Experiences (London, National Consumer Council, 1995)Google Scholar
Winterton, George, ‘The Separation of Powers as an Implied Bill of Rights’ in (ed.), Future Directions in Australian Constitutional Law (Sydney, Federation Press, 1994), p. 185Google Scholar
Wood, Hon. James, Royal Commission into the NSW Police Service Final Report (Government of the State of New South Wales, 1997), www.pic.nsw.gov.au/Reports_List.asp?type=Royal at 25 April 2007
Woolf, Rt Hon. Lord, Access to Justice: Final Report to the Lord Chancellor on the Civil Justice System in England and Wales (Lord Chancellor's Department, 1996), www.dca.gov.uk/civil/final/ at 25 April 2007
, Innocence Regained: the Fight to Free Lindy Chamberlain (Annandale, NSW, Federation Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Young, Warren, Cameron, Neil and Tinsley, Yvette, Juries in Criminal Trials, Part Two, A Summary of the Research Findings, Law Commission of New Zealand Preliminary Paper 37 (Wellington, Law Commission, 1999), vol. 2
, ‘Televising Court Trials in Canada: We Stand on Guard for a Legal Apocalypse’ (1979) 5 Dalhousie Law Journal694Google Scholar
‘Across USA’ (1996) 96 Lawyers Weekly USA198
, ‘The Thicket of Rules North of the Border: Canadian Perspectives on a Free Press and Fair Trials’ (1998) WinterMedia Studies Journal24 (New York)Google Scholar
, ‘TV and the Supreme Court: Broadcasters Want Access, but will They Deliver Serious Coverage?’ (2003) 5 Columbia Journalism Review, www.cjr.org/issues/2003/5/tv-aho.asp at 25 April 2007Google Scholar
, ‘Televising of Federal Hearing is Permitted; Judge Allows First Use of Cameras since 1944’ (1996) 215(42) New York Law Journal2Google Scholar
and , ‘Publication Restrictions and Criminal Proceedings’ (1994) 36 Criminal Law Quarterly168 (Agincourt, Ontario)Google Scholar
American Bar Association Committee on Professional Ethics and Grievances, ‘Formal Opinion 67 (March 21, 1932)’ (1932) 18 American Bar Association Journal550
American Bar Association Lawpoll, ‘Lawyers aren't Convinced that TV Belongs in Courtrooms’ (1979) 65 American Bar Association Journal1306
, ‘American Bar Association; Australian Bar Association Members, Media Debate Camera Issue’ (1982) 68 American Bar Association Journal256Google Scholar
and , ‘Justice by the Consent of the Governed’ (1998) WinterMedia Studies Journal80 (New York)Google Scholar
, ‘Would Publicly Televising Trials Enhance or Degrade the Trial Process?’ (1999) 1 Western Carolina Journal of Law and Justice, www3.wcu.edu/~mabel/austin.htm at 25 April 2007Google Scholar
, ‘The Play's the Thing: an Unscientific Reflection on Courts under the Rubric of Theatre’ (1975) 28 Stanford Law Review81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Bar Paves Way for TV Courts’ (1990) 87(6) Law Society5 (London)
‘Bar Support for Television Pilot Scheme’ (1991) 141 New Law Journal190 (London)
‘Bar Ushers in Televised Trials’ (1989) 133 Solicitors Journal668 (London)
‘Bar Working Party Reports’ (1989) May–June Counsel5 (London)
, ‘News Cameras in the Courtroom: a Review of the Empirical Literature’ (1986) 8 Progress in Communication Sciences177 (Norwood, NJ)Google Scholar
,‘An Analysis and Review of News Cameras in the Courtroom: a Free Press-Free Trial Debate’ (1989) 11(2) Communications and the Law61 (Westport, CT)Google Scholar
, ‘Good Morning, Folks: We Present “the Case of the Month!”’ (1963) 49 American Bar Association Journal548Google Scholar
, ‘The United Kingdom’ (2004) 12 William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal687 (Williamsburg, VA)Google Scholar
, ‘In the Wake of Chandler v Florida: a Comprehensive Approach to the Implementation of Cameras in the Courtroom’ (1981) 33 Federal Communications Law Journal117 (Los Angeles)Google Scholar
, ‘Letting the Public Know: the Educative Role of the Courts’ (1994) 1 Canberra Law Review165Google Scholar
,‘Letting the Public Know: Courts Should Promote Greater Public Understanding of their Functions’ (1994) 29(6) Australian Lawyer24Google Scholar
,‘“Opening Address” at Courts and Media Forum Sydney 1998’ (1999) 1 University of Technology Sydney Law Review7Google Scholar
, ‘The Checking Value in First Amendment Theory’ (1977) American Bar Foundation Research Journal523Google Scholar
,‘Scots Criminal Procedure and the Lockerbie Trial’ (1999) 11 International Legal Perspectives11 (Portland, OR)Google Scholar
, and , ‘Cameras in Courtroom: the Effects of Media Coverage on Witness Testimony and Juror Perceptions’ (1990) 14 Law and Human Behavior489 (New York)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Court Technology in Canada’ (2004) 12 William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal681 (Williamsburg, VA)Google Scholar
, ‘Address by William J Brennan, Jr Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States’ (1979) 32 Rutgers Law Review173Google Scholar
‘Broadcasters Keep Fighting to Televise Trials’ (1994) 18(3) The News Media and the Law62 (Washington)
‘Broadcasting: No Televising of Trial: Devolution Issues’ (2000) Winter Public Law703 (London)
‘Broadcasting of Judicial Proceedings from Court Rooms Condemned’ (1932) 18 American Bar Association Journal761
, ‘The Legal and Policy Implications of Courtroom Technology: the Emerging English Experience’ (2004) 12 William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal699 (Williamsburg, VA)Google Scholar
, ‘From the Chief Justice’ (2004) 4(6) Courtside: Newsletter of the Family Court of Australia2Google Scholar
‘Call to Televise Trials’ (1989) 86(20) Law Society6 (London)
‘Camera Access Advances in Oklahoma, New York’ (2000) 24(2) The News Media and the Law13 (Washington)
‘Cameras Barred from Smith Double-Murder Trial’ (1995) 19(3) The News Media and the Law12 (Washington)
, ‘Reasons for Judgement: Some Consumer Perspectives’ (2003) 77 Australian Law Journal62Google Scholar
, ‘Access to the Courts and its Implications’ (1999) 1 University of Technology Sydney Law Review127Google Scholar
‘Can TV Crews be Trusted in Court?’ (1994) Northern Law News1 (Auckland)
, ‘Supreme Court Releases Audio Tape of Affirmative Action Arguments’ (2003) 27(2) The News Media and the Law34, www.rcfp.org/news/mag/27-2/bct-battlesf.html at 25 April 2007 (Washington)Google Scholar
‘Canon 35 Reaffirmed’ (1963) 49 American Bar Association Journal357
, ‘Journalists’ Efforts to Roll Cameras into Courtrooms Get Mixed Results’ (2002) 26(2) The News Media and the Law19 (Washington)Google Scholar
, ‘An Open Courtroom: Should Cameras be Permitted in New York State Courts’ (1998) 18 Pace Law Review297 (White Plains, NY)Google Scholar
, ‘Rights or Wrongs? The Human Rights Australian Capital Territory in the Courts’ (2005) 79 Australian Law Journal36Google Scholar
, ‘Considering Cameras in the Courtroom’ (1995) 39 Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media555 (Washington, DC)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Controlling Courtroom Publicity: Common Law Strategies’ (1985) International Legal Practitioner47 (London)Google Scholar
,‘Contempt by the Media: How the Courts Define It’ (1986) Australian Quarterly388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,‘OJ and the Dingo: How Media Publicity relating to Criminal Cases Tried by Jury is Dealt with in Australia and America’ (1997) 45 American Journal of Comparative Law109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,‘Media Prejudice during a Criminal Jury Trial: Stop the Trial, Fine the Media, or Why Not Both’ (1999) 5 University of Technology Sydney Law Review1Google Scholar
‘Circuit Courts to Determine Camera Coverage of Hearings: State Courts also Rule to Allow Cameras’ (1996) 20(2) The News Media and the Law34 (Washington)
‘Code for Media Coverage of Court Proceedings’ (2000) 544 LawTalk10 (Wellington)
and , ‘People v Simpson: Perspectives on the Implications for the Criminal Justice System: the Agony of Victory and the Ethics of Lawyer Speech’ (1996) 69 Southern California Law Review1627Google Scholar
Committee on Professional Ethics, ‘Opinion 67: Judicial Ethics – Impropriety of Permitting Radio Broadcasting of Court Proceedings’ (1932) 18 American Bar Association Journal549
‘Controversies Continue over Camera Access to Courts’ (2000) 24(3) The News Media and the Law (Washington)
, ‘Don't Get Trampled by Media Circus’ (1997) 83, Feb American Bar Association Journal8Google Scholar
‘Court Rules Judge Should Review Notes’ (1992) 16(4) The News Media and the Law35 (Washington)
‘Court TV Deterrent?’ (1988) 138 New Law Journal906 (London)
‘Courts versus the Media’ (1998) 36(10) Law Society Journal25 (London)
, ‘Cameras in Courts do not Adversely Affect Conduct of Court Proceedings’ (1991) 205(83) New York Law Journal40Google Scholar
, ‘Television in our Courts: the Proven Advantages, the Unproven Dangers’ (1980) 64 Judicature85 (Chicago)Google Scholar
‘Defense News’ (2000) 67 Defense Counsel Journal429 (Chicago)
and , ‘The Accused: a Documentary of a Jury Trial’ (2003) 30(3) Brief17 (Law Society of Western Australia)Google Scholar
, ‘Bringing Down the Curtain on Courtrooms’ (1994) 16(10) Amercian Journalism Review50Google Scholar
, ‘Generic Prejudice: How Drug War Fervor Threatens the Right to a Fair Trial’ (1991) 40 American University Law Review821Google Scholar
, ‘The Courts and the Media: What Reforms are Needed and Why’ (1999) 1 University of Technology Sydney Law Review25Google Scholar
,‘The Judicial Role in the New Millennium’ (2001) 10 Journal of Judicial Administration133 (North Ryde, N.S.W.)Google Scholar
, ‘An Alternative View of Media Judiciary Relations: What the Non Legal Evidence Suggests about the Fair Trial-Free Press Issue’ (1989) 18 Hofstra Law Review1 (Hamstead, NY)Google Scholar
, ‘The Televised Mediated Trial: Formal and Substantive Characteristics’ (1989) 37 Communication Quarterly305 (University Park, PA)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Colombian Journalists Become Pawns in Armed Struggle’ (2000) First Quarter IPI Report16 (Manchester)Google Scholar
, ‘Media Access to Courts in South Australia’ (1992) 12(2) Communications Law Bulletin23 (NSW)Google Scholar
and , ‘Electronic Coverage of the Courts: Exceptions to Exposure’ (1987) 75 Georgetown Law Journal1633Google Scholar
, ‘State Supreme Court Takes on the Media's Candid Cameras’ (1997) California Lawyer24Google Scholar
, ‘Lights, Camera, Action: Computer-Animated Evidence Gets its Day in Court’ (1993) 34 Boston College Law Review1087Google Scholar
, ‘Televised Justice: Considered Proposals for the Controlled Use of Television Cameras in the United Kingdom Courts’ (1997) 11(4) Contemporary Issues in Law23 (London)Google Scholar
‘Evidence – Evidence (Audio Visual and Audio Linking) Australian Capital Territory 1997 (Vic)’ (1998) Commonwealth Law Bulletin55 (London)
‘“Fair Trial” Concerns Prevail over Camera Access’ (1995) 19(3) The News Media and the Law11 (Washington)
‘Federal Appellate Courts Wary of Camera Access’ (1996) 20(3) The News Media and the Law21 (Washington)
‘Federal Court Camera Test Planned’ (1990) The News Media and the Law31 (Washington)
, ‘Fear and Loathing: the Courts and the Media’ (1995) 5 Journal of Judicial Administration39 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
, ‘Through the Camera Lens: When Justice is Not Seen to be Done’ (1995) 69 Australian Law Journal477Google Scholar
, ‘The Use of Publicity as a Criminal Sanction against Business Corporations’ (1971) 8 Melbourne University Law Review107Google Scholar
‘Flemington's Cooperative Darkroom Produced 120 Pictures in 80 Minutes’ (1935) Editor and Publisher5 (New York)
‘Flight Attendant Loses Appeal over Surreptitious Taping’ (1997) 20(4) The News Media and the Law30 (Washington)
, ‘The Courts and the Media: What Reforms are Needed and Why’ (1999) 8 University of Technology Sydney Law Review1Google Scholar
, ‘Judges Restrict Camera Access in Courtrooms’ (2002) 26(4) The News Media and the Law12 (Washington) www.rcfp.org/news/mag/26-4/bct-camsrndu.html at 25 April 2007Google Scholar
, ‘Pilot Project for Televising of Court Proceedings Proposed’ (1994) LawTalk6 (Wellington)Google Scholar
and , ‘The Effects of Pretrial Publicity: the Bernardo Case’ (1996) Canadian Journal of Criminology253Google Scholar
, ‘A Moment of Change: Personal Reflections on the National Native Title Tribunal 1994–98’ (2003) 27(2) Melbourne University Law Review488Google Scholar
, ‘Criminal Law Symposium: Publicity in High Profile Criminal Cases’ (1998) 10 St Thomas Law Review507 (Miami)Google Scholar
, ‘Cameras in the Courtroom: Guidelines for State Criminal Trials’ (1985–86) 84 Michigan Law Review475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,‘Trial of Alleged Terrorist Spotlights Camera Issue’ (2002) 26(1) The News Media and the Law21 (Washington)Google Scholar
, ‘A Lively Public Issue: Canon 35 in the Light of Recent Events’ (1957) 43 American Bar Association Journal420Google Scholar
, ‘Trial by Television: Are We at the Point of No Return?’ (1980) 63 Judicature419 (Chicago)Google Scholar
,‘Cameras on Trial: the “O.J. Show” Turns the Tide’ (1995) 39 Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media562 (Washington, DC)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Video-Technology in the Criminal Courts of the United Kingdom and Canada’ (1989) 53 Journal of Criminal Law215 (London)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Us Judicial Conference Votes to Allow Cameras into Appellate Courts’ (1996) 215(49) New York Law Journal2Google Scholar
, ‘Justice and TV: Some Thoughts on Congressional Investigations’ (1952) 38 American Bar Association Journal15Google Scholar
, ‘Doing Justice with Cameras in the Courts’ (1998) WinterMedia Studies Journal32 (New York)Google Scholar
, ‘The Standards of the Legal Profession: Canon 35 Should Not be Surrendered’ (1962) 48 American Bar Association Journal615Google Scholar
, ‘Memorandum of Law of Regional News Networks in Support of its Motion for Limited Intervention and Application to Provide Audio-Visual Coverage of Trial Proceedings’ (2000) 63 Albany Law Review1002Google Scholar
, ‘Some Object Lessons on Publicity in Criminal Trials’ (1940) 24 Minnesota Law Review (Journal of the State Bar Association)453Google Scholar
and , ‘Media Coverage of Law: Its Impact on Juries and the Public’ (1991) 35 American Behavioral Scientist136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Cameras and the Need for Unrestricted Electronic Media Access to Federal Courtrooms’ (1996) 69 Southern California Law Review827Google Scholar
, ‘Don't Rush to Judgement on Court TV in the OJ Simpson Aftermath’ (1995) 3 Media Law Reporter1 (Washington, DC)Google Scholar
, ‘The Mass Media and the Criminal Process: a Public Service or a Public Circus?’ (1992) New Zealand Law Journal271Google Scholar
and , ‘Videotaped Trial Transcripts for Juror Deliberations’ (1998) 82 Judicature84 (Chicago)Google Scholar
, ‘Televising of Court Proceedings Pilot under Evaluation’ (1996) LawTalk9 (Wellington)Google Scholar
,‘Television Coverage of Court Proceedings: Pilot Extended and Rules’ (1996) LawTalk44 (Wellington)Google Scholar
, ‘Trial by Television: Television Broadcasting within the Judicial System’ (1995) 77 Media International Australia120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House of Delegates, ‘Proceedings of the House of Delegates: Mid Year Meeting, February 25–26, 1952’ (1952) American Bar Association Journal425
House of Delegates,‘Proceedings of the 1963 Midyear Meeting of the House of Delegates’ (1963) American Bar Association Journal385
House of Delegates,‘Cameras in Court’ (1979) American Bar Association Journal340
‘House Pulls the Plug on Cameras in Court’ (1979) 65 American Bar Association Journal333
, ‘Court System Panel: the Media, Attorneys, and Fair Criminal Trials’ (1995) 4 Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy61Google Scholar
, ‘Courtroom Coverage: the Effects of Being Televised’ (1977) 21 Journal of Broadcasting487 (Washington)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffman, Justice Richard D., (1996) June–July Judicial Council of California Court News
,‘Trial Judges May Hold Key to Effectiveness of Revised Rule of Cameras in Court’ (1997) November–December Judicial Council of California Court NewsGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Human Rights Australian Capital Territory and Legal Culture: the Judiciary and the Legal Profession’ (1999) 26 Journal of Law and Society86 (Oxford)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Televising the Courts: Case against Reform’ (1992) Media Law and Practice174 (London)Google Scholar
‘In Camera with Court TV’ (1994) 69(47) New Yorker28
, ‘Reporting the Courts: the Media's Rights and Responsibilities’ (1999) 34 Irish Jurist1Google Scholar
,‘Activism and Restraint: Human Rights and the Interpretative Process’ (1999) 4 European Human Rights Law Review350 (London)Google Scholar
, ‘The Inherent Jurisdiction of the Court’ (1970) 23 Current Legal Problems23 (Oxford)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Judges Deny Court Camera Use’ (1990) The News Media and the Law40 (Washington)
‘Judges Ease Restrictions on Cameras in Courts’ (1992) 16(1) The News Media and the Law52 (Washington)
Judicial Council of California, ‘Media and Courts: Searching for Balance’ (1996) June–July Court News12
‘Justice Stewart Retires’ (1981) 67 American Bar Association Journal954
, ‘TV Cameras, Public Self-Consciousness, and Mock Juror Performance’ (1984) 20 Journal of Experimental Social Psychology336 (New York)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Supreme Court Beat: How Television Covers the US Supreme Court’ (1983) 67 Judicature7 (Chicago)Google Scholar
,‘The First Amendment and Technological Change: the New Media Have a Message’ (1989) 57 George Washington Law Review1459Google Scholar
, ‘Video-Conferencing in the County Court’ (1998) 72(12) Law Institute Journal67 (Melbourne)Google Scholar
, ‘Federal Court Online with “Ecourt” Initiatives’ (2001) 39(3) Law Society Journal34 (London)Google Scholar
, ‘Leaving the Trial to the Court: the PM's List of Cases’ (1990) 28(8) Law Society Journal76 (London)Google Scholar
Keyzer, Patrick, ‘What the Courts and the Media Can Do to Improve the Standard of Media Reporting of the Work of the Courts’ (1999) 11 University of Technology Sydney Law Review1
, ‘The Story Behind the Adoption of the Ban on Courtroom Cameras’ (1979) 63 Judicature14 (Chicago)Google Scholar
,‘Judiciary, Media and Government’ (1993) 3 Journal of Judicial Administration63 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
,‘Forum: Televising Court Proceedings’ (1995) 18 University of New South Wales Law Journal483Google Scholar
,‘Acting Judges: a Non-Theoretical Danger’ (1998) 8 Journal of Judicial Administration69 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
,‘The Future of Courts: Do They Have One?’ (1998) 9 Journal of Law and Information Science141 (Broadway, NSW)Google Scholar
, ‘No More Heroes: War Correspondents Retreat from the Front Line and Allow Truth to be Buried at Scripted Press Briefings’ (2000) 6 IPI Report8 (Manchester)Google Scholar
, ‘Videoconferencing in Civil Cases in Victoria’ (1999) 73(7) Law Institute Journal71 (Melbourne)Google Scholar
, and , ‘Pretrial Publicity, Judicial Remedies and Jury Bias’ (1990) 14 Law and Human Behavior409 (New York)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Court on Radio: a First for South Australia’ (1997) Law Society Journal of South Australia Bulletin10Google Scholar
,‘Ground Breaking TV Documentary’ (1997) Law Society Journal of South Australia Bulletin 15Google Scholar
, ‘How the Media Missed Rwandan Genocide’ (2000) First Quarter IPI Report11 (Manchester)Google Scholar
, ‘Courtroom Television Cameras and the Media’ (1995) 16 Media Law and Practice139 (London)Google Scholar
, ‘On Camera Proceedings: a Critical Evaluation of the Inter-Relationship between the Principle of Open Justice and the Televising of Court Proceedings in Australia’ (1999) 25 Monash University Law Review54Google Scholar
, ‘Cameras in the Courtroom? A Fair Trial is at Stake’ (1995) 31(3) Trial68 (Washington)Google Scholar
,‘TV or Not TV: That is the Question’ (1996) 86 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology928 (Chicago)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Lawyers Aren't Convinced that TV Belongs in Courtrooms’ (1979) 65 American Bar Association Journal1306
, ‘The Courtroom as a Stop on the Information Superhighway’ (1997) 71 Reform4 (Australian Law Reform Commission, Sydney)Google Scholar
and , ‘Lights, Camera, Action in the Courts’ (1999) 73(8) Law Institute Journal64 (Melbourne)Google Scholar
, ‘Reporting the Rodney King Trial: the Role of Legal Experts’ (1994) 27 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review649Google Scholar
‘Lights, Camera, Action at Parramatta’ (2004) 4 Courtside: Newsletter of the Family Court of Australia1
et al., ‘How Print and Broadcast Journalists Perceive Performance of Reporters in Courtroom’ (1988) 65 Journalism Quarterly621 (Minneapolis)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘An Assessment of the Use of Cameras in State and Federal Courts’ (1984) 18 Georgia Law Review389Google Scholar
, ‘Camera Access to Courtrooms: Canadian, US, and Australian Experiences’ (1993) 18(1) Canadian Journal of Communication, www.cjc-online.ca/viewarticle.php?id=138&layout=html at 25 April 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Effect on Juries Hearing about the Defendant's Previous Criminal Record: a Simulation Study’ (2000) Criminal Law Review734 (London)Google Scholar
Los Angeles Superior Court, (2001) Spring Gavel to Gavel 1
, ‘Big Trouble: Celebrity Journals and the Good Old Days that Never Were’ (1998) 12 Media Studies Journal46 (New York)Google Scholar
, ‘Contempt by Publication’ (2004–5) 85 Reform27 (Australian Law Reform Commission, Sydney)Google Scholar
and , ‘Review of the Extent of Courtroom Technology in Australia’ (2004) 12 William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal649 (Williamsburg, VA)Google Scholar
, ‘Television Coverage of Western Australian Court Proceedings?’ (1996) 23(1) Brief6 (Law Society of Western Australia)Google Scholar
,‘Judicial Evolution: Interview with Sir Anthony Mason by Innes, Prue and Burstin, Fay’ (1995) 69(8) Law Institute Journal745 (Melbourne)Google Scholar
, ‘Court on Camera: Electronic Broadcast Coverage of the Legal Proceedings’ (2000) Picturing Justice: The Online Journal of Law and Popular Culture (University of San Francisco School of Law), www.usfca.edu/pj/camera-mason.htm at 25 April 2007Google Scholar
,‘Justice Seen to be Done? Electronic Broadcasting of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’ (2001) 95 American Society of International Law Proceedings210Google Scholar
, ‘Camera Shy: the Supreme Court has Allowed TV into the Lower Courts Why do they Ban it for Themselves?’ (1989) Student Lawyer42 (Chicago)Google Scholar
, ‘The Ways Available to the Judicial Arm of Government to Preserve Judicial Independence’ (1992) 1 Journal of Judicial Administration236 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
, ‘Does Chapter III of the Constitution Protect Substantive as well as Procedural Rights?’ (2001) 3 Constitutional Law and Policy Review57 (St. Leonards, NSW)Google Scholar
, ‘Scotch Mist: the Lockerbie Trial and Article 10’ (2001) 46 Journal of the Law Society of Scotland21Google Scholar
, ‘Justice through the Eye of a Camera: Cameras in the Courtrooms in the United States, Canada, England and Scotland’ (1996) 14 Dickinson Journal of International Law673 (Carlisle, PA)Google Scholar
, ‘Broadcasters Improvise to Cover Young Bush Hearing’ (2001) 25(3) The News Media and the Law27 (Washington)Google Scholar
Morgan, D. G., ‘Section 31: the Broadcasting Ban’ (1990–92) 25–27 Irish Jurist 117
‘Problems Posed by Publicity to Crime and Criminal Proceedings’ (1961) 110 University of Pennsylvania Law Review11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Televising the Courts: an Appraisal of the Scots Experiment’ (1995) 159 Justice of the Peace and Local Government Law (Little London, Chichester)Google Scholar
, ‘Electronic Media Coverage of Courts and the Role of Counsel: a Survey of Counsel's Views and the Possible Impacts’ (2006) 11(1) MALR26Google Scholar
, ‘Fair Trial of Free Press: Legal Responses to Media Reports of Criminal Trials’ (1994) 53 Cambridge Law Journal492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Role of the Public Information Officer in New South Wales’ (1995) 5 Journal of Judicial Administration34 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
, ‘Does Research Support the Estes Ban on Cameras in the Courtroom?’ (1980) 63 Judicature467 (Chicago)Google Scholar
‘New Code of Judicial Conduct is Adopted by the American Bar Association’ (1972) 58 American Bar Association Journal1207
‘News Forces to Pack NJ Town for Trial’ (1934) Editor and Publisher 16 (New York)
,‘Judicial Independence and the Conduct of Media Relations by Courts’ (1993) 2 Journal of Judicial Administration207 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
,‘The Courts, the Media and the Community’ (1995) 5 Journal of Judicial Administration5 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
,‘The Paperless Court? Technology and the Courts in the Region’ (2002) 12(2) Journal of Judicial Administration63 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
and , ‘The Impact of Pretrial Publicity on Jurors: a Study to Compare the Relative Effects of Television and Print Media in a Child Sex Case’ (1994) 18 Law and Human Behavior507 (New York)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘Coming Ready or Not: Courts and Information Technology’ (1997) 71 Reform10 (Sydney)Google Scholar
‘Open Justice’ (1989) 142 New Law Journal957 (London)
, ‘Protection of Judicial Process as an Implied Constitutional Principle’ (1994) 16 Adelaide Law Review341Google Scholar
, ‘Turning the Camera on Court TV: Does Televising Trials Teach Us Anything about the Real Law?’ (1997) 58 Ohio State Law Journal655Google Scholar
, ‘BC Lawyer Champions Cameras in Court’ (2001) 4 University of British Columbia Journalism ReviewGoogle Scholar
, ‘Lights, Camera, Cross-Examination: Television Cameras in the Court’ (1990) NSW Bar Association5Google Scholar
‘Photographers Enjoy Improved Court Access’ (2001) 25(4) The News Media and the Law40 (Washington)
, ‘Pretrial Suppression Hearings: In Camera or on Camera?’ (1983) 29 Loyola Law Review515 (New Orleans)Google Scholar
‘Pilot Program Suggested for Sunshine Australian Capital Territory Changes’ (1995) 19(4) The News Media and the Law19 (Washington)
, ‘Federal Judges to Weight Cameras, Judicial Conference to Consider Newman Plan for Circuit Courts’ (1996) 215(43) New York Law Journal1Google Scholar
, ‘The OJ Simpson Trial and the American Legal System’ (1995) 145 New Law Journal990 (London)Google Scholar
, ‘TV in the Courtroom: Right of Access?’ (1981) 3(1) Communications and the Law11 (Westport, CT)Google Scholar
, ‘Television in the Courtroom: Von Bülow and the Jazz Singer’ (1982) 25 Saint Louis University Law Journal813Google Scholar
, ‘Cameras in Court: What Can Cameras in Parliament Teach Us?’ (1998) Contemporary Issues in Law82 (London)Google Scholar
,‘Televising Courtroom Proceedings in Canada: Relevant Considerations for the UK’ (2002) 7 Communications Law188 (Surrey)Google Scholar
‘Proceedings in Courts of Petty Sessions Televised’ (1981) 55 Australian Law Journal511
‘Proceedings of the House of Delegates: Mid-Year Meeting’ (1952) 38 American Bar Association Journal425
Public Issues Committee of the Auckland District Law Society, ‘Televising Trials’ (1995) New Zealand Law Journal101
, ‘Courts Should Take Strong Action to Stop Trials by Media’ (1991) 13 Australian Journalism Review45Google Scholar
, ‘The Impact of a Televised Trial on Individuals’ Information and Attitudes’ (1992) 75 Judicature204 (Chicago)Google Scholar
‘Reno, Judges Support Cameras in Courts; Some Politicians Want to Pull the Plug after Simpson Trial’ (1995) 19(4) The News Media and the Law43 (Washington)
‘Report of the Special Committee on Cooperation between Press, Radio and Bar as to Publicity Interfering with Fair Trial of Judicial and Quasi-Judicial Proceedings’ (1937) 62 American Bar Association Report851
,‘Panelists Differ over TV's Impact on Trials’ (1992) 78 OctAmerican Bar Association Journal44Google Scholar
,‘No More Cameras in Federal Courts: Judicial Conference Ends Experiment Despite Few Complaints from Judges’ (1994) 80 NovAmerican Bar Association Journal 28Google Scholar
,‘Courtroom Cameras Face New Scrutiny’ (1995) 81 NovAmerican Bar Association Journal48dGoogle Scholar
,‘Rally for Court Cameras Falls Short’ (1995) 81 MarAmerican Bar Association Journal30Google Scholar
,‘A Repeat Performance: Judicial Conference Allows Cameras Back in Appeals Courts’ (1996) 82 MayAmerican Bar Association Journal38Google Scholar
, ‘Television Coverage of Trials: Constitutional Protection against Absolute Denial of Access in the Absence of a Compelling Interest’ (1985) 30 Villanova Law Review1267Google Scholar
, ‘The Hauptmann Trial in the Light of English Criminal Procedure’ (1935) 21 American Bar Association Journal301Google Scholar
, ‘An Empirical and Normative Analysis of the Impact of Televised Courtroom Proceedings’ (1998) 51 Southern Methodist University Law Review621 (Dallas)Google Scholar
, ‘Media and Judges in Queensland Time for Change?’ (1997) 17(2) Proctor7 (Queensland)Google Scholar
, ‘The Media and Criminal Contempt: the English Experience’ (1989) New Zealand Law Journal282Google Scholar
, ‘Courting Technology: Planning is Needed to Make Electronic Wizardry Work in New Courtrooms’ (1997) 83 NovAmerican Bar Association Journal112Google Scholar
and , ‘Public Trust and Confidence in the Courts: What Public Opinion Surveys Mean to Judges’ (1999) Court Review 24 (New Orleans)Google Scholar
, ‘The Rising Problem of Abusive Attorneys and Trial Publicity’ (1996–7) 21 Journal of the Legal Profession267 (University, AL)Google Scholar
, ‘Casenote: In Re Post-Newsweek Stations and Chandler v Florida: Television on Trial’ (1981) 35 University of Miami Law Review345Google Scholar
, ‘From Access to Justice to Managing Justice: the Transformation of the Judicial Role’ (2002) 12 Journal of Judicial Administration5 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
, ‘What Do Jury Experiments Tell Us about How Juries (Should) Make Decisions?’ (1997) 6(1) Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal1Google Scholar
, ‘Scientific and Procedural Aspects of the Hauptmann Trial’ (1935) 21 American Bar Association Journal177Google Scholar
, ‘Electronic Media Access to Federal Courtrooms: a Judicial Response’ (1990) 23 University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform769Google Scholar
, ‘Send Lawyers, Guns and Microphones’ (1989) 14 Legal Service Bulletin261 (Fitzroy, Vic.)Google Scholar
, and , ‘Public Perception of the Supreme Court in the 1990s’ (1998) 82 Judicature66 (Chicago)Google Scholar
, ‘Nebraska Press Association: an Expansion of Freedom and Contradiction Theory’ (1977) 29 Stanford Law Review431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘CJC Reiterated its Opposition in spite of its Subcommittee Recommendations’ (2001) 21 Lawyers Weekly (Ontario)Google Scholar
,‘Judicial Council Divided over TV Cameras in Court “It's like Working in a Juristic Jurassic Park” Says Critic’ (2001) 21 Lawyers Weekly (Ontario)Google Scholar
,‘Ontario's Chief Justice Rejects Televising Trial Proceedings’ (2003) 22 Lawyers Weekly (Ontario)Google Scholar
, ‘Whether Broadcasting of Court Proceedings Unlawful’ (2001) Entertainment Law Review N (London)Google Scholar
‘Scots Look at Televised Courts’ (1992) 142 New Law Journal79 (London)
‘Screenwriter Ordered to Testify in OJ Simpson Double-Murder Trial’ (1995) 19(4) The News Media and the Law22 (Washington)
, ‘Supporters of Cameras in Court See Benefits of Televising Trials’ (1995) 31(3) Trial70 (Washington)Google Scholar
, ‘The Trial as One of the Performing Arts’ (1966) 52 American Bar Association Journal1145Google Scholar
‘Simpson's Trial and the Rush to Reform’ (1995) 79 Judicature56 (Chicago)
and , ‘Methodological Issues in the Evaluation of “Experiments” with Cameras in the Courts’ (1982) 30 Communication Quarterly376 (University Park, PA)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Media Coverage of Supreme Court Decision Making: Problems and Prospects’ (1991) 75 Judicature128 (Chicago)Google Scholar
Special Committee on Cooperation between the Press, Radio and Bar, ‘Report’ (1936) 62 American Bar Association Report851
, ‘Seen to be Done: the Principle of Open Justice, Part I’ (2000) 74 Australian Law Journal290Google Scholar
‘Seen to be Done: the Principle of Open Justice, Part II’ (2000) 74 Australian Law Journal378Google Scholar
, ‘Cyber Courts: Using the Internet to Assist Court Processes’ (1997) 8 Journal of Law and Information Science240 (Broadway, NSW)Google Scholar
, ‘Showing to Jury of Videotape of Examination de Bene Esse’ (1988) 62 Australian Law Journal727Google Scholar
‘The First Video Tele-Hearing Conducted by the High Court of Australia’ (1988) 62 Australian Law Journal407Google Scholar
‘State Keeps Abuse Complaint, Investigation Reports Secret’ (1996) 20(1) The News Media and the Law27 (Washington)
et al., ‘The Effects of Pre-Trial Publicity on Juror Verdicts: a Meta-Analytic Review’ (1999) 23 Law and Human Behavior219 (New York)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Understanding Speech Rights: Defensive and Empowering Approaches to the First Amendment’ (2004) 26(1) Media, Culture and Society103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Justice on the Box? The Televising of Trials Panders to the Current Trend for True-Life Crimes rather than Showing the Reality’ (1994) 91(42) Law Society's Gazette2 (London)Google Scholar
, ‘Why Shouldn't Australian Court Proceedings be Televised?’ (1994) 17 University of New South Wales Law Journal345Google Scholar
‘Cameras in Courts: a Reflection on Contemporary Issues’ (2003) 3 Peppercorn15 (Canberra)Google Scholar
‘The Broadcast of Court Proceedings in the Internet Age: the Role of Courts’ (2004) 85 Reform33 (Sydney)Google Scholar
‘Technology and Public Access to Audio-Visual Coverage and Recordings of Court Proceedings: Implications for Common Law Jurisdictions’ (2004) 12 William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal791 (Williamsburg, VA)Google Scholar
,‘A Comparative Analysis of First Amendment Rights and the Televising of Court Proceedings’ (2004) 40 Idaho Law Review315Google Scholar
‘Court TV: Coming to an Internet Browser Near You’ (2006) 15 Journal of Judicial Administration218 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
and , ‘Court in the Web’ (2000) 25(2) Alternative Law Journal71 (Clayton, Vic.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘TV or Not TV: Televised and Photographic Coverage of Trials’ (1978) 29 Mercer Law Review1119 (Macon, GA)Google Scholar
, ‘Why it's Not Free Speech Versus Fair Trial’ (1998) 13 University of Chicago Legal Forum109Google Scholar
and , ‘Cameras in State Courts: a Historical Perspective’ (1994) 78 Judicature128 (Chicago)Google Scholar
, ‘Put Cameras in Top Court, but Don't Expect Viewers’ (1997) 147 New Jersey Law Journal405Google Scholar
, ‘Colliding with Contempt: Journalists Facing Order of Prior Restraint Question whether to Comply or Risk Court Action’ (2002) 26(3) The News Media and the Law4 (Washington)Google Scholar
, ‘The Courts, the Media and the Community : a Victorian Perspective’ (1995) 5 Journal of Judicial Administration22 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
‘Access to the Courts and its Implications’ (1999) 1 University of Technology Sydney Law Review112Google Scholar
‘Tele-Justice’ (1989) 139 New Law Journal705 (London)
‘Televised Courts’ (1988) 85(45) Law Society5 (London)
‘Television in Scotland’ (1992) 142 New Law Journal1149 (London)
‘Tennessee Begins Camera Experiment, while Others Consider Restrictions’ (1996) 20(1) The News Media and the Law38 (Washington)
, ‘Cameras before the Courts’ (2001) 3(4) University of British Columbia Journalism Review, www.journalism.ubc.ca/thunderbird/archives/2001.04/cameras.html at 25 April 2007Google Scholar
and , ‘Video in the Misdemeanor Court: the South Florida Experience’ (1985) 69 Judicature13 (Chicago)Google Scholar
, ‘Courts Reexamine Access to Jury Information: Missouri, Ohio High Courts Affirm Presumptive Right of Access’ (2003) 27(1) The News Media and the Law19 (Washington)Google Scholar
,‘District Attorney Petitions Appeals Court to Vacate Judge's Order Permitting “Frontline” to Tape Jury’ (2003) 27(1) The News Media and the Law22 (Washington)Google Scholar
‘Philadelphia Inquirer asks US Supreme Court to Review Ban that Kept Media from Interviewing Jurors’ (2003) 27(1) The News Media and the Law21 (Washington)Google Scholar
, ‘“Guide to Judicial Conduct”: a New Handbook for Judges’ (2003) 77 Australian Law Journal240Google Scholar
, ‘Constitutionalising the Role of the Judge: Scotland and the New Order’ (2001) 5 Edinburgh Law Review49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Interview with the Media: Practitioners’ Duty to the Court’ (1998) LawTalk31 (Wellington)Google Scholar
and , ‘The Case against Television in the Courtroom’ (1980) 16 Willamette Law Review777Google Scholar
‘Trial Secrecy and the First Amendment Right of Public Access to Judicial Proceedings’ (1978) 91 Harvard Law Review1899CrossRef
‘Truth and Rumour’ (1995) 145 New Law Journal1565 (London)
‘Turning the Camera on Court TV: Does Televising Trials Teach Us Anything about the Real Law’ (1997) 58 Ohio State Law Journal655
, ‘Cameras Cross Atlantic: the USA's Trial Broadcasters are Making a Pitch to Televise UK Hearings’ (1995) 92(19) Law Society's Gazette14 (London)Google Scholar
‘Video Cameras Allowed in City Board Meetings’ (1996) 20(1) The News Media and the Law28 (Washington)
, ‘Fundamental Rights, Fair Trials and the New Audio Visual Sector’ (1996) 59 Modern Law Review517 (London)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Challenge of Information Technology in Australian Courts’ (1999) 9 Journal of Judicial Administration8 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
‘Courts on-Line: Public Access to the Electronic Court Record’ (2000) 10 Journal of Judicial Administration94 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
, ‘Digital Courtrooms in Perth: the Courtroom Strikes Back’ (1999) 26(9) Brief5 (Law Society of Western Australia)Google Scholar
, ‘Fights, Camera, Action: as the Government Considers Letting Cameras into Court to Film Appeals, a Look at whether Television Impedes Justice’ (2001) 98(40) Law Society Gazette22 (London)Google Scholar
, ‘Digital Courtrooms in Perth: the Courtroom Strikes back’ (1999) 26 Brief5 (Law Society of Western Australia)Google Scholar
and , ‘Banning Broadcasting: a Transatlantic Perspective’ (1992) Media Law and Practice179 (London)Google Scholar
, and , ‘Preparing for the High Profile Case: an Omnibus Treatment for Judges and Lawyers’ (1999) 51 Florida Law Review425Google Scholar
‘What We See’ (1996) National Law Journal (New York)
, ‘Florida's Experience with Cameras in the Courtroom’ (1978) 64 American Bar Association Journal1860Google Scholar
, ‘Ministry of Justice Video Link Service’ (2001) 28(2) Brief33 (Law Society of Western Australia)Google Scholar
, ‘The Courts and the Media: What Reforms are Needed and Why’ (1999) 7 University of Technology Sydney Law Review1Google Scholar
and , ‘Methodological Considerations in Pretrial Publicity: Is the Medium the Message’ (1988) 22 Law and Human Behavior585 (New York)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Justice in Living Color: the Case for Courtroom Television’ (1974) 60 American Bar Association Journal294Google Scholar
, ‘Teleconferencing of Courtroom Evidence’ (1991) 65(9) Law Institute Journal862 (Melbourne)Google Scholar
, ‘The Role of the Electronic Media in the Criminal Justice System’ (1978) 47 University of Cincinnati Law Review417Google Scholar
, ‘Overcoming Future Shock: Estes Revisited, or a Modest Proposal for the Constitutional Protection of the News-Gathering Process’ (1980) 4 Duke Law Journal641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘A hard case’, Daily Telegraph (Sydney), 1 August 2003, p. 29
Abrahamson, Alan, ‘Gap divides worlds of Menendezes, their jurors’, Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles), 27 December 1993
Abrams, F., ‘The public needs TV to oversee the courts’, New York Times (New York), 26 September 1994
Ackland, Richard, ‘TV eye in the storm of justice’, Sydney Morning Herald (Sydney), 12 June 1998
Ackland, Richard,‘New rape trial is on a slim premise’, Sydney Morning Herald (Sydney), 5 March 2004
Adams, David, ‘Child murder judges question TV sentence’, The Age (Melbourne), 23 December 1995, p. 1
Adams, Geoff, ‘Yorta claim starts’, Shepparton News (Shepparton, Vic.), 29 October 1996, p. 1
Adams, Geoff,‘Yorta land “taken” ’, Shepparton News (Shepparton, Vic.), 30 October 1996, p. 1
Adams, Phillip, ‘The trials of justice’, Weekend Australian (Melbourne), 25–26 September 1993, p. 2
Ainsworth, Bill, ‘Legislative ban on cameras in California courts dies in Committee’, Recorder (Sacramento), 11 April 1996
Ainsworth, Bill,‘California judges to have last word on cameras’, Recorder (Sacramento), 20 May 1996, p. 1
Aisbett, Norman, ‘Days of reckoning’, West Australian (Perth), 20 November 1999, p. 3
Aisbett, Norman,‘Atrocities of Srebrenica’, West Australian (Perth), 27 November 1999, p. 5
Albrechtsen, Janet, ‘Dreamer courts legal contention’, The Australian (Sydney), 20 October 2004, p. 15
‘Aramoana victim's family say no to televised trial’, Malborough Express (New Zealand), 27 April 1995
Atkinson, Peter, ‘Camera ban in toddler murder trial’, Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 2 July 1995, p. 42
‘Australian judge allows TV to show sentencing of murderer’, The Press (Christchurch), 15 May 1995
‘Back-off by TV on court filming’, New Zealand Herald, 29 May 1995
Bailey, Judy, ‘Media advocates blast Georgia's new Camera Bill’, Fulton County Daily Report (Atlanta), 28 February 1996, p. 1
‘Bain case TV bid denied’, Greymouth Evening Star (New Zealand), 28 April 1995
‘Bain murder trial will not be televised’, Nelson Evening Mail (New Zealand), 28 April 1995
‘Bain trial to ban TV cover’, New Zealand Herald, 28 April 1995
‘Bain trial won't be televised’, Evening Standard (Pamerston North), 28 April 1995
Bain, George, ‘The criminal trial as sport spectacle’, Maclean's (Toronto), 20 February 1995, p. 55
Bain, Helen, ‘Publicity fear for Barlow's second trial’, Dominion (Wellington), 26 June 1995
Baldwin, Tom, ‘This is not a trial, says Law Lord’, The Times (London), 2 August 2003, p. 4
Balogh, Stefanie and Meade, Kevin, ‘Conservationists declare war’, Weekend Australian (Brisbane), 15–16 February 1997, p. 4
‘Bank killer told his mother “I'm Sorry” ’, New Zealand Herald (Auckland), 17 October 2003, p. A13
‘Banning the cameras’, Maclean's (Toronto), 20 March 1995, p. 19
Barker, Garry, ‘Courts may crack down on mobiles’, The Age (Melbourne), 17 June 2003
‘Barlow judge bans photos’, Hawkes Bay Herald Tribune (Hastings), 19 May 1995
Barton, Fiona, ‘Murder trials to be broadcast on British TV within two years’, Mail on Sunday (London), 10 September 1995, p. 17
Baum, Geraldine, ‘Courtroom of the frightening and surreal’, Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles), 10 February 1995
‘British Broadcasting Corporation2 to air OJ Simpson trial special’, Broadcast (London), 6 October 1995
Beach, Bennett H., ‘Blind justice gets a seeing eye’, Time, 9 February 1981, p. 35
Bennett, Alison, ‘Behind the Bar’, West Australian (Perth), 2003, p. 5
Bennett, Vanora, ‘War crimes trial and error’, Weekend Australian (Perth), 17 April 2004
Beynen, Martin van, ‘TV firms subdued over filming trials’, The Press (Christchurch), 22 February 1995, p. 5
‘Bid to televise Bain case turned down’, Westport News, 28 April 1995
‘Bid to televise Bain trial fails’, Timaru Herald (New Zealand), 28 April 1995
Bigart, Homer, ‘Estes goes on trial in Texas with TV in courtroom’, New York Times (New York), 25 September 1962
Biskupic, Joan, ‘Vote on cameras reveals judges’ deep concern; mistrust of media is called a factor in decision against televising Federal Court hearings’, Washington Post (Washington DC), 23 September 1994, p. A3
Black, Joanne, ‘Axe-murder first for TV coverage’, Daily News (New Plymouth), 18 May 1995
Black, Hon. Michael E. J., ‘Court TV verdict cannot be rushed’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 6 November 1995
Bonnington, Alistair, ‘Lockerbie appeals will create TV history’, The Times (London), 22 January 2002
Borick, K. V., ‘Trial may provoke real debate how a jury works’, Weekend Australian (Melbourne), 7–8 October 1995
Boswell, D. J., ‘Courts and television’, Sunday Star Times (Wellington), 23 April 1995
Boyes, Roger, ‘Chilling Smile of a German Cannibal’, The Australian (Perth), 5 December 2003, 13
Boyes, Roger,‘A mercy killing, not murder, accused cannibal claims’, The Australian (Perth), 10 December 2003, p. 8
Boyes, Roger,‘From cyber fantasy to cannibal's dinner plate’, The Australian (Perth), 23 December 2003, p. 7
Brady, David E., ‘Ito defends televising of Simpson trial’, Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles), 24 October 1995, p. B3
Brady, Nicole and Gibson, Rachel, ‘A mixed reaction to a slice of history’, The Age (Melbourne), 19 May 1995, p. 8
Bravin, Jess, ‘High Court's deep divisions have almost always healed – so far’, Wall Street Journal (Washington), 14 December 2000, p. A19
Bremner, Charles, ‘US tunes in to soap opera trial of a dynasty’, The Australian (Sydney), 6 November 1991
Brewster, Deborah, ‘US will be role model for Australian digital television’, Weekend Australian (Brisbane), 7–8 February 1998, p. 7
Brill, Steven, ‘The eye that educates’, New York Times (New York), 15 July 1994, p. 2
Brill, Steven,‘Cameras in the courts and original intent’, Legal Times (Detroit), 22 January 1996, p. 24
Brill, Steven,‘Death row TV’, Brill's Content (New York), April 2001, p. 24
Brockie, Jenny, ‘TV cameras can open courts to greater scrutiny’, The Australian (Melbourne), 22 May 1995
Brook, Kip, ‘Plea to keep cameras out of Bain trial’, Greymouth Evening Star (New Zealand), 27 April 1995
Brook, Stephen, ‘Photo finish for press freedom in Parliament’, The Australian (Melbourne), 14–20 February 2002, p. 3
Broughton, Philip Delves, ‘A last look, then terrorist lies down’, Daily Telegraph (London), 12 June 2001, p. 4
Brown, Bruce D., ‘D.C. judges aren't poised to become media stars’, Legal Times (Detroit), 18 March 1996, p. 2
Bryant, Hon. Diana, ‘From the Chief Justice’ (2004) 4(6) Courtside: Newsletter of the Family Court of Australia 2
Bunyan, Nigel, ‘215 murders: Shipman's terrible toll’, Weekly Telegraph (London), 24–30 July 2002, p. 1
Burke, Shane, ‘Police fail to show bloody ski mask’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 24 June 1994
Burkeman, Oliver, ‘All the decisions have to be taken by me. I alone will decide what matters’, Guardian (London), 2 August 2003, p. 1
Burman, Neil, ‘“Lights, Gavel, Action” in Courtroom’, West Australian (Perth), 15 May 1999, p. 5
Burnett, Dan, ‘The battle for cameras in court’, Broadcast Dialogue (Canada), March 2002, p. 37
Burton, T., ‘Gallery's old masters given new orders’, The Australian (Perth), 13–19 June 2002, p. 4
Butcher, Steve, ‘Court TV man appears again’, The Age (Melbourne), 28 April 1996, p. 4
Butler, Bruce, ‘Tribal punishment call’, Sunday Times (Perth), 21 March 1999
Butler, Julie, ‘Media “Shackled” in court matters’, West Australian (Perth), 12 June 2002, p. 44
Butterfield, Alan and Fitz, Reginald, ‘Battered Nicole: her sister took photos’, National Enquirer (US), 3 January 1995, p. 46
‘Camera records guilty plea’, The Press (Christchurch), 15 March 1995
‘Camera-equipped cell phones courting disaster’, Mainichi Daily News (Tokyo), 3 November 2002
‘Cameras in court’, Evening Standard (Palmerston North), 14 March 1995
‘Cameras in court a worry’, New Zealand Herald, 17 February 1995
‘Cameras in court; public's right to know, hear, see is foremost’, Houston Chronicle (Houston), 24 September 1994, p. 26
‘Cameras in courtrooms survive’, New Zealand Herald, 28 March 1995
‘Cameras in Courts’, Evening Post (Wellington), 26 May 1995
Campbell, Gerard, ‘Lawyers oppose televised court’, The Press (Christchurch), 21 February 1995
Campbell, Roderick, ‘Federal Court may be first to be televised’, Canberra Times (Canberra), 26 May 1994
Campbell, Roderick,‘Institute of Judicial Administration Conference’, Canberra Times (Canberra), 21 August 1995, p. 2
‘Canada tries to expel accused Nazi’, The Australian (Melbourne), 24 January 1997, p. 5
‘Canty lawyers opposed to televised trials’, The Press (Christchurch), 15 March 1995
Carruthers, Fiona, ‘TV “Losing its reputation for reliable” News’, The Australian (Melbourne), 13 July 1994, p. 5
Cash, William, ‘British nanny reprieved via the American way of justice’, The Australian (Melbourne), 12 November 1997
Catliff, Nick, ‘His Lordship regrets that this particular case …’ The Times (London), 15 November 1994, p. 29
Catliff, Nick,‘Lockerbie: a trial for television’, Guardian (London), 22 February 1999
Catliff, Nick,‘Trust the people’, Guardian (London), 7 February 2000, p. 4
‘Chief Justice turned off by courts on TV’, West Australian (Perth), 25 March 2007
Chrisafis, Angelique, Wells, Matt and Travis, Alan, ‘Leslie free as media row escalates’, Guardian (London), 2003, p. 1
Chulov, Martin, ‘Gang rape pair avoid new trial’, The Australian (Perth), 4 February 2005, p. 1
‘Clark takes stand in Milosevic trial’, West Australian (Perth), 16 December 2003, p. 21
Clarke, Magnus, ‘Justice runs out of juice’, Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 8 October 1995, p. 41
Clifton, Jane, ‘Police oppose cameras in courts’, Sunday Star Times (Wellington), 19 February 1995, p. A3
Clune, Bronwen, ‘Don't vilify us: lawyer’, West Australian (Perth), 25 September 1998
Cocker, Alan, ‘Courtrooms not the place for television’, New Zealand Herald (Wellington), 11 May 1995
Coffey, Michelle, ‘Telecast whets an appetite’, The Australian (Melbourne), 19 May 1995, p. 4
Coffey, Michelle and Hawes, Rachel, ‘Murder sentence broadcast divides the nation’, The Australian (Melbourne), 19 May 1995, p. 1
Coles, Joanna, ‘Judging by the ratings, she's courting stardom’, The Australian (Perth), 30 July 1999
Conroy, Paul, ‘Justice being seen to be done’, The Age (Melbourne), 7 October 1995, p. A13
Conroy, Paul,‘Courts to cast new eye on crime’, The Age (Melbourne), 14 October 1995, p. A10
Conroy, Paul,‘Teague takes TV lead but reception still hazy’, The Age (Melbourne), 23 December 1995, p. 2
Conroy, Paul,‘Trial may use video graphics as jury aid’, The Age, 22 February 1993, p. 8
Conway, Doug, ‘In the beginning …’, Gold Coast Bulletin, 8 April 1997, p. 9
Cooper, Dani, ‘High court net access a boom for women’, The Australian (Perth), 2 December 2003, p. 29
Corelli, Rae, ‘North versus south’, Maclean's (Toronto), 29 May 1995, p. 18
Corrs Chambers Westgarth Solicitors, ‘Medialine’, Medialine, June 1995
Corrs Chambers Westgarth Solicitors,‘Medialine’, Medialine, December 1995
Costello, Michael, ‘Negative images of war overshadow the good things’, The Australian (Melbourne), 28 May 2004, p. 13
Costigan, Peter, ‘Publish and (occasionally), be damned’, Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 27 November 1994, p. 46
‘Could it happen here?’ Maclean's (Toronto), 18 July 1994, p. 2
Coulson, Russel, ‘Court venue custom-built’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 19 August 1996, p. 16
‘Court case televised’, Wairato Times (Hamilton), 14 March 1995
‘Court in Goulburn session’, Shepparton News (Shepparton, Vic.), 28 October 1996, p. 1
‘Court “no place” for TV cameras’, The Press (Christchurch), 7 October 1995
‘Court restrictions limit coverage: TV stations’, Dominion (Wellington), 29 May 1995
‘Courtroom filming a first’, Daily News (Taranaki, NZ), 15 March 1995
‘Courtroom TV cameras given test run’, Timaru Herald (New Zealand), 15 March 1995
‘Courts camera shy’, New Zealand Herald (Napier), 3 June 1995
‘Courts twice turn camera shy’, New Zealand Herald, 31 May 1995
Critchley, Cheryl, ‘Lavarch hint on TV trials’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 22 May 1995, p. 10
Crompton, Helen, ‘Taking on Judge Judy’, Sunday Times (Perth), 5–11 December 1999, p. 50
Davis, Patricia and Seaberry, Jane, ‘Bobbitt jury re-enacted pre-crime events’, Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles), 23 January 1994, p. A33
Davis, Robert, ‘The animated court’, Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 21 August 1994, p. 97
Day, Mark, ‘Courting the public’, The Australian (Melbourne), 9–15 December 1999, p. 13
Deutsch, Anthony, ‘Dutch court convict seven in suffocation deaths’, Moscow-Pullman Daily News (Moscow, Idaho), 11 May 2001, p. 5A
Devine, Frank, ‘Who dares loses in addled court rules’, The Australian (Melbourne), 16 September 1994, p. 15
Devine, Frank,‘In defence of OJ educational television’, The Australian (Melbourne), 9 October 1995, p. 11
‘Double Exposure’, Who (Melbourne), 30 October 1995, p. 38
‘Dr Death found hanged in cell’, West Australian (Perth), 14 January 2004, p. 15
Eccleston, Roy, ‘Here comes the judge’, The Australian Magazine (Melbourne), 22–23 June 1996, p. 20
Editorial, ‘Cameras in the court’, Washington Post (Washington DC), 11 July 2004
Editorial, ‘Judges will be under microscope’, New Zealand Herald, 15 October 2003, p. A18
Editorial, ‘Kicking cameras out of courtrooms’, Chicago Tribune (Chicago), 23 September 1994
Estrich, Susan, ‘Vigilante justice’, Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles), 16 January 1994, p. M1
‘Facts and opinions about cameras in courtrooms’, Court-TV (New York), January 1997, 18
‘Fair and exact: Lord Hutton's Inquiry has started well’, Guardian (London), 2 August 2003, p. 23
‘Fair trial “may be difficult” ’, Greymouth Evening Star (New Zealand), 26 June 1995
‘Faux Jacko's days in court’, Weekend Australian (Perth) 12–13 March 2005, p. 23
‘Federal Court goes online’, West Australian (Perth), 2 August 1999, p. 34
Field, Gillian, ‘Chief Justice briefly disrobes’, Canberra Times (Canberra), 21 May 1994
Fife-Yeomans, Janet, ‘Who denies contempt charges’, The Australian (Melbourne), 21 June 1994
Fife-Yeomans, Janet,‘Kerr backs TV in courts’, The Australian (Melbourne), 21 August 1995
Fife-Yeomans, Janet,‘Camera on crime’, Weekend Australian (Perth), 26–27 August 1995, p. 22
Fife-Yeomans, Janet,‘Judges learn to put on a public face’, Weekend Australian (Brisbane), 19–20 April 1997, p. 7
Fife-Yeomans, Janet,‘Courts ask public to be the judges’, The Australian (Brisbane), 21 August 1997
Fife-Yeomans, Janet,‘Judges sign off to let computers sort out marital disputes’, The Australian (Brisbane), 23 March 1998
Fife-Yeomans, Janet,‘Judges defend maligned courts’, The Australian (Perth), 7 September 1998, p. 2
Fife-Yeomans, Janet,‘A case of appearance, Your Honour’, The Australian (Perth), 1 April 1999, p. 3
Fife-Yeomans, Janet,‘Courting disaster’, The Australian (Perth), 21 February 2002, Media 24
Fife-Yeomans, Janet,‘Sets the legal drama bar too low’, The Australian (Melbourne), 22–28 May 2003, p. 24
Fife-Yeomans, Janet, Meade, Kevin and Blake, Emma, ‘Lavarch derides court TV’, The Australian (Melbourne), 15 October 1995
‘Filming refused’, Dominion (Wellington), 28 April 1995
‘First televised court hearing’, Dominion (Wellington), 15 March 1995
Fisher, David, ‘Judge followed and filmed by irked claimant’, Sunday Star Times (Wellington), 5 October 2003
Flahvin, Anne, ‘Justice through the eye of the camera’, Sydney Morning Herald (Melbourne), 26 September 1994
Fleeman, Michael, ‘OJ judge allows cameras to cover trial’, The Australian (Melbourne), 9 November 1994, p. 11
Flint, David, ‘The myth of trial by media’, The Australian (Melbourne), 14 May 1996, p. 17
‘Former judge backs Borbidge’, Courier Mail (Brisbane), 10 August 1998
Fotheringham, Allan, ‘The media and the message’, Maclean's (Toronto), 13 February 1995, p. 88
Frean, Alexandra, ‘British Broadcasting Corporation presses Mackay to allow cameras in court’, The Times (London), 24 August 1994, p. 4
‘From dossier to death: the key moments, the key people’, Guardian (London), 2 August 2003, p. 4
Gadens Lawyers, ‘Work Relations E-update: Royal Commission into Building and Construction’, September 2001, www.gadens.com.au/publications.asp?CategoryID=33&navid=4&cid=24 at 25 April 2007 www.gadens.com.au/docushare/dscgi/admin.py/Get/File-919/eSep01_royal_commission_building_industry.pdf
Gale CJ, ‘The problems of television in the courtrooms’ (1974) 8 LSUC Gazette (Ontario) 4
Gallardo, Eduardo, ‘Court drops Pinochet's worst charges’, USA Today (Seattle), 9 March 2001, p. 6A
Gamlin, Jeff, ‘Parliament versus the judiciary’, National Business Review (Wellington), 10 October 2003, p. 28
Gardner, Simon, ‘Nanny appeal to Blair’, Sunday Times (Melbourne), 3 October 1999, p. 33
Gaunder, Yashwant, ‘World's first Internet coup’, The Australian (Perth), 25–31 May 2000, p. 13
Gibb, Frances, ‘Irvine ready to allow TV cameras in Appeal Court’, The Times (London), 10 March 2003, p. 4
Gibb, Frances,‘Lord Chief Justice warns Ministers he is not crying wolf ’, The Times (London), 2 August 2003, p. 6
Gibb, Frances,‘Televising of courts: don't hold your breath’, The Times (London), 18 January 2005, Law 5
Gibson, Roy, ‘Doing justice to WA’, West Australian (Perth), 3 January 2004, p. 7
Gibson, Roy, Butler, Julie and Robb, Trevor, ‘Free at last’, West Australian (Perth), 26 February 2002, p. 1
Gordon, Jim, ‘No camera fans here’, News Photographer (Durham, NC), May 1996, 4
Graham, Scott, ‘California High Court to weigh in on public access to civil trials’, Recorder (US), 19 December 1996, p. 1
Greenhouse, Linda, ‘Distaining a sound bite, Federal judges banish TV’, New York Times (New York), 25 September 1994, p. 4
Gregory, Peter, ‘Court allows Yorta Yorta to record land claim for posterity’, The Age (Melbourne), 28 October 1996, p. A4
Gregory, Peter,‘Yorta Yorta People start battle for land they love’, The Age (Melbourne), 29 October 1996, p. A4
Gregory, Peter,‘Yorta Elder sees no need for court’, The Age (Melbourne), 30 October 1996
Gregory, Peter and Gibson, Rachel, ‘Killer gets life as “TV judge” makes history’, The Age (Melbourne), 19 May 1995, p. 1
Groner, Jonathan, ‘Who rules? Which rules? Cameras-in-court decision tests power of Judicial Conference’, Legal Times (Detroit), 11 March 1996, p. 2
Grove, Jennifer, ‘MP's study TV house rules’, West Australian (Perth), 18 September 1999, p. 49
Gunn, Michelle, ‘Hinch defends naming victim on TV’, The Australian (Melbourne), 4 March 1994
Hainsworth, Jeremy, ‘Internet publication ban on BC trial challenged’, Seattle Times (Seattle), 21 March 2003
Hall, Jane, ‘And the verdict is …’, Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles), 27 December 1993, p. F1
Hansen, Peter, ‘Seeing justice is a trial’, Sunday Mail (London), 23 November 1997, p. 121
Harder, Christopher, ‘Tapes in court’, Sunday Star Times (Auckland), 19 October 2003, p. C9
Haslem, Benjamin, ‘Ruddock to face Federal Court revolt’, The Australian (Perth), 3 June 2002, p. 1
Hattam, Grant, ‘The case for change’, Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 2 July 1995, p. 108
Hattam, Grant,‘Truth collides with justice’, Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 8 October 1995
Hawes, Rachel, ‘TV cameras to film murder sentencing’, The Australian (Melbourne), 13 May 1995, p. 1
Hawes, Rachel,‘OJ trial sparks calls for greater access to juries’, Weekend Australian (Melbourne), 7–8 October 1995
Hawes, Rachel,‘Chief Magistrate a safe choice’, The Australian (Melbourne), 8 May 1996, p. 4
Hay, David, ‘Media awards Hollywood madam poor second to OJ’, The Age (Melbourne), 20 November 1994
Hayslett, Jerrianne, ‘What a difference a lens makes’, Court Manager (Williamsburg, VA), 1997, p. 21
Henderson, Craig and Rayner, Stan, ‘A woman spurned’, Who (Melbourne), 30 October 1995
Henderson, Gerard, ‘Judges who court the spotlight’, Sydney Morning Herald (Sydney), 9 April 1996, p. 11
Henderson, Ian, ‘Chief Justice says only sick society would televise court’, The Australian (Sydney), 25 June 2001, p. 4
Henningham, John, ‘At odds with the court of public opinion’, The Australian (Melbourne), 20–26 November 2003, p. 7
Henry, Scott, ‘New Chief Magistrate advocates cases on TV’, The Australian (Melbourne), 25 November 1993, p. 5
Hewitt, Sue, ‘I know fate of Azaria’, Sunday Times (Perth), 4 July 2004, p. 1
Hickman, Belinda, ‘Judge allows cameras for verdict in 40-year manslaughter saga’, The Australian (Melbourne), 25 February 2002, p. 4
‘Hicks facing “Stalinist-style show trial” ’, The Australian (Melbourne), 14 July 2003, p. 5
‘High Court wants PR’, Daily Telegraph (Sydney), 29 December 1998, p. 20
Ho, Christina, ‘NSW courts idea of televised trials’, Sydney Morning Herald (Sydney), 3 September 1999, p. 4
Hogan, Dan and Mason, Paul, ‘Let the people see the Lockerbie trial’, The Times (London), 9 February 1999, p. 21
Hooks, Barbara, ‘Televised trials: are they inevitable here?’ The Age (Melbourne), 14 December 1995, p. 10
Hopkins, Jim, ‘Trial of the alien Undie Muncher supremely conducted’, New Zealand Herald (Auckland), 17 October 2003, p. A19
Hopkins, Nic, ‘Rush to use Web slows to a crawl’, The Australian (Perth), 1 May 2000, p. 36
‘Hostage tells of gunman's “one more victim” threat’, New Zealand Herald (Auckland), 17 October 2003
Hudson, Mike, ‘Nine TV guilty of naming victim’, The Australian (Sydney), 9 May 1990
Hughes, Judy, ‘North ruling flawed, Patrick tells Federal Court’, The Australian (Brisbane), 23 April 1998, p. 4
‘Hutton's hunt for truth’, Daily Telegraph (London), 2 August 2003, p. 21
‘Identification of Hauptmann follows police testing’, New York Times (New York), 9 January 1935, p. 12
‘In Australia's best interest’, Daily Telegraph (London), 18 September 2001, p. 20
‘Injudiciously camera shy; barring cameras in US courts is slap at public’, Buffalo News (Buffalo), 25 September 1994, p. 2
Innes, Prue, ‘Camera shy: why our judges won't show their faces on TV’, The Australian (Perth), 1 April 1999, p. 2
Irving, Mark, ‘Hotelier, TV man in court carpark scuffle’, The Australian (Brisbane), 7 August 1996
Jackson, Sally, ‘Pushing their opinions’, The Australian (Perth), 27 February 2003, p. 4
Jackson, Sally,‘Media companies claim law should be out of court’, The Australian (Perth), 17–23 July 2003, p. 3
‘Jail for 23 years for war crimes’, West Australian (Perth), 19 December 2003, p. 34
Jameson, Julietta, ‘TV banned from Simpson civil trial’, Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 25 August 1996
Jefferies, Pamela, ‘Parties request tribunal confidentiality’, New Zealand Herald, 15 March 1995
Jellie, Dugald, ‘Switch on radio: why a courtroom drama defeated radio’, The Age (Melbourne), 25 May 1995, Green Guide 9
Jenish, D'arcy and Driedger, Sharon Doyle, ‘Legal lesson or soap opera?’ Maclean's (Toronto), 13 March 1995, p. 35
Johnston, Philip, ‘Judges denounce Blunkett's policy on asylum claims’, Daily Telegraph (London), 1 August 2003, p. 6
Johnston, Tony, ‘Crime and Punishment’, Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 13 December 1998, p. 6
‘Judge bars photographs, radio’, The Press (Christchurch), 24 May 1995
‘Judge gives warning over courtroom TV’, Sydney Morning Herald (Sydney), 21 August 1995
‘Judge limits cameras’, Northern Advocate (Whangarei), 19 May 1995
‘Judge outlaws court cameras’, Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 8 October 1995
‘Judge sticks to TV only’, Evening Standard (Palmerston North), 24 May 1995
‘Judge suggests TV execution’, Weekend Australian (Melbourne), 26 July 1994, p. 14
‘Judges more favourable toward camera coverages; three year experiment ends’, Legal Intelligencer (Philadelphia), 17 November 1993, p. 5
‘Judges will be under microscope’, New Zealand Herald, 15 October 2003, p. A18
‘Judging genocide’, The Economist, 16 June 2001, p. 27
‘Judicial Conference turns down TV radio coverage of Federal Courts’, Communications Daily (Washington), 22 September 1994, p. 3
Judicial Council of California, ‘Cameras in courtroom, juries are focus of latest justice reforms’, Court News (California), December–January 1995–96, p. 1
Judicial Council of California,‘Revised cameras rule reaffirms judicial discretion’, Court News, 1996, p. 4
‘Jury in Oakes murder trial misdirected court told’, Dominion (Wellington), 15 March 1995
‘Jury reveals racial conflict in legal system’, The Australian (Brisbane), 5 October 1995, p. 7
‘Jury to tour massacre site’, West Australian (Perth), 10 February 1999
‘Justice after the OJ Simpson trial’, Weekend Australian (Melbourne), 7–8 October 1995
‘Justice should be seen to be done’, Independent (London), 30 June 1995
Kerin, John and Towers, Katherine, ‘Judge in attack on threat to judiciary’, Weekend Australian (Melbourne), 15–16 October 1994, p. 9
‘Kicking cameras out of courtrooms’, Chicago Tribune (Chicago), 23 September 1994, p. 20
‘Kidnap wife sought justice’, The Australian (Melbourne), 25 October 1994
‘Kobe in the dock: yet another “Trial of the Century” is gearing up’, The Economist, 18 October 2003, p. 34
Kotanides, John Jr, ‘Justice falls in McVeigh delay’, USA Today (New York), 17 May 2001, p. 14A
Krum, Sharon, ‘Lucrative trials of court cable’, The Australian (Melbourne), 9 November 1994, p. 20
Lagan, Bernard, ‘Courting controversy’, Bulletin (Sydney), 14 October 2003, p. 28
Lampers, Michael N., ‘Keep those cameras out of the Supreme Court’, USA Today (New York), 6 December 2000, p. 24A
‘Land case to resume’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 6 January 1997, p. 7
Landesman, Cosmo, ‘Courage of her conviction’, The Australian (Perth), 11 September 1998, p. 13
Lane, Bernard, ‘TV coming to a court near you, says Kirby’, The Australian (Brisbane), 18 August 1997
Lane, Bernard,‘High Court “needs media voice” ’, The Australian (Perth), 11 May 1998, p. 5
Lane, Bernard,‘High Court tests case for Net’, The Australian (Perth), 7 December 1999, p. 3
Laugesen, Ruth, ‘PM predicts Maori move to national structure’, Dominion (Wellington), 15 March 1995
‘Law Lord attacks asylum rethink’, West Australian (Perth), 5 March 2004, p. 26
Lawson, Mark, ‘Smoke that lingers: it's the media – not the courts – that decide guilt or innocence’, Guardian (London), 2 August 2003, p. 21
‘Lawyers cheer court use of tape-recorders’, The Australian (Melbourne), 21 May 1992
‘Lawyers fear effect of television on trials’, Nelson Evening Mail (New Zealand), 1 April 1995
‘Lawyers fear effect of TV cameras in courtrooms’, The News (Westport), 31 March 1995
Laxon, Andrew, ‘Police call to end televised trials’, New Zealand Herald, 24 March 1995
Laxon, Andrew,‘Court TV trial to continue’, New Zealand Herald, 25 March 1995, p. 1
Le Grand, Chip, ‘Rash trio forces lethal to rethink TV’, The Australian (Perth), 25 May 2004, p. 18
Legalbrief News Diary, ‘Sport: King Inquiry runs into obstacles’, Legalbrief News Diary (Durban), 2003
Legge, Kate, ‘Sensationalism dominates justice via cable network’, The Australian (Sydney), 2 August 1991, p. 6
Leonard, Tom, ‘Hutton Inquiry television ban’, Daily Telegraph (London), 6 August 2003, p. 4
‘Let public discuss new court’, New Zealand Herald (Auckland), 11 December 2002, p. A18
‘Letter to editor: the public needs TV to oversee the courts’, New York Times, 26 September 1994
Lewis, J., ‘Jurors fly to Belarus to study “war crimes” site’, Guardian Weekly (Manchester), 21 February 1999, p. 8
Lewis, Robert, ‘Tabloid journalism?’ Maclean's (Toronto), 24 January 1994, p. 2
‘Lights, Camera, Action at Parramatta’ (2004) 4(6) Courtside: Newsletter of the Family Court of Australia 1
Linklater, Magnus, ‘Court on camera: justice done’, The Times (London), November 1994, p. 18
Lipski, Sam, ‘Azaria case reflects journalism's worst – and best’, Bulletin (Sydney), 25 February 1986, p. 86
Lloyd, Megan, ‘People assured of easy access and their say in Environment Resources Development Court’, City Messenger (Adelaide), 17 July 1996, p. 15
‘Lockerbie defense tries to shift blame in trial’, USA Today (New York), 6 December 2000, p. 22A
‘Lords query overhaul of legal system’, West Australian (Perth), 10 March 2004, p. 30
Lose, Joseph, ‘Crim-cams win over lawyers’, Sunday News (New Zealand), 26 March 1995
Louisson, Simon, ‘OJ trial casts doubt on court TV plans’, Evening Post (Wellington), 11 October 1995
Lusetich, Robert, ‘A nation is glued to screens as LA Law meets the Simpsons’, Weekend Australian (Melbourne), 2–3 July 1994, p. 12
Lusetich, Robert,‘Bobbitt stars in uncut porn movie’, The Australian (Melbourne), 3 September 1994
Lusetich, Robert,‘OJ acquittal splits nation’, The Australian (Melbourne), 5 October 1995, p. 1
Lusetich, Robert,‘OJ and the morning after’, The Australian (Melbourne), 5 October 1995, p. 9
Lusetich, Robert,‘No, no nanny’, Weekend Australian (Melbourne), 15–16 November 1997, p. 21
Lyons, John, ‘Showtime for justice’, The Australian Magazine (Melbourne), 21–22 May 1994, p. 12
Lytle, Jeffrey F., ‘Supreme Court should allow live coverage during its election hearings’, Moscow-Pullman Daily News (Moscow, Idaho), 29 November 2000, p. 6A
Macintyre, Ben, ‘A tragedy in black and white’, The Australian (Melbourne), 6 October 1995, p. 14
Mackenzie, Kate, ‘Digital recorders will change the way we watch TV’, The Australian (Perth), 4 December 2002, p. 7
Maclennan, Catriona, ‘Women in the law battle for equality’, Dominion (Wellington), 15 March 1995
MacLeod, Murdo, ‘Top advocate calls for TV cameras to roll in Scott courts’, Scotland on Sunday (Glasgow), 30 June 2002, p. 8
Madigan, Michael, ‘Boat people find new way to Australia’, Courier Mail (Brisbane), 17 September 2001, p. 3
Malatesta, Grace, ‘Trial in style in new courts’, West Australian (Perth), 9 April 1999
Malatesta, Grace,‘Video justice spans two nations’, West Australian (Perth), 5 June 1999, p. 12
Malatesta, Grace,‘Courts put on bad face, says Report’, West Australian (Perth), 8 June 1999, p. 10
Malatesta, Grace,‘WA wins with innovative software’, West Australian (Perth), 8 June 1999, p. 10
Malatesta, Grace,‘Long arm of the law learns digital tricks’, West Australian (Perth), 4 August 1999, p. 26
Malatesta, Grace,‘Media accused of unfair judge attacks’, West Australian (Perth), 7 August 1999, p. 32
Mara, Carol, ‘Is this justice?’ The Australian Magazine (Melbourne), 28–29 October 1995, p. 39
Martin, Roger, ‘Foss moves to make life harder for court nuisances’, West Australian (Perth), 26 September 1998, p. 32
Mason, Hon. Anthony, ‘Justice on the screen’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 12 June 1995, p. 29
Mathieson, Clive, ‘Digital TV in every house IT networks win frequencies’, The Australian (Melbourne), 10 February 1998, p. 8
Mathieson, Clive,‘Alston holds the control in TV's Brave New World’, The Australian (Melbourne), 9 March 1998
Mathieson, Clive,‘Unlikely allies to fight digital TV monopoly’, The Australian (Melbourne), 12 March 1998, p. 4
Mathieson, Clive,‘Digital signals channel diversity on public TV’, The Australian (Melbourne), 26 March 1998
Mauro, Tony, ‘Cameras to come out of Federal Courts’, USA Today (New York), 21 September 1994, p. 1
McDonnell, Dan, ‘Receptive to Change’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 8 February 1994, p. 13
McGrath, John, ‘Tribunal TV raises “Judge Judy” fear’, West Australian (Perth), 24 January 2004, p. 190
McGregor, Richard and Balogh, Stefanie, ‘Colston will “die before he faces court” ’, Weekend Australian (Perth), 1–2 May 1999, p. 3
McGuiness, Padraic P., ‘All things being equal, justice must be seen to be done’, The Age (Melbourne), 25 February 1995, p. 23
McLennan, David, ‘High Court decisions must be open to dialogue – Professor Michael Coper’, Canberra Times (Canberra), 22 September 2003, p. 7
McNair, Brian, ‘Counterblast’, Sunday Herald (Sydney), 12 December 1999
McNeil, Wayne, ‘TV turns justice into soap opera’, New Zealand Herald, 25 March 1995
McNicoll, D. D., ‘Conventional wisdom’, The Australian (Melbourne), 26 January 1998
Meade, Amanda, ‘Where the bucks stop’, The Australian (Melbourne), 2 December 1999, p. 11
Meade, Kevin and Hart, Cath, ‘Judge demands trial Web blackout’, The Australian (Perth), 26 January 2005, p. 3
‘Media banned from court hearing’, Gold Coast Bulletin, 29 April 1997, p. 12
Meertens, Grace, ‘Chief Justice defends bench’, West Australian (Perth), 4 August 1998, p. 6
Meertens, Grace,‘Survey finds public unhappy with courts’, West Australian (Perth), 5 September 1998, p. 39
Meertens, Grace,‘Media “threat” to role of judges’, West Australian (Perth), 18 September 1998, p. 26
Meertens, Grace,‘WA's top judge attacks human rights abuse in Asia’, West Australian (Perth), 24 September 1998, p. 30
‘Melba’, The Australian (Brisbane), 25 March 1997, Features 11
Merritt, Chris, ‘Hearsay’, Australian Financial Review (Perth), 5 May 2000 2000, p. 36
Meryment, Elizabeth, Morley, Peter and Metcalf, Fran, ‘Goss's CJC Review “eyed core duties” ’, Courier Mail (Brisbane), 21 February 1997
Messina, Alex, ‘Tricky first hour for Chief Magistrate’, The Age (Melbourne), 25 November 1993, p. 7
Messina, Alex,‘Lights, Camera, Action: they're in court and so are you’, The Age (Melbourne), 7 July 1994, p. 1
Messina, Alex,‘Must justice be seen?’ The Age (Melbourne), 8 July 1994, p. 9
Messina, Alex,‘Federal Court to consider TV move’, The Age (Melbourne), 15 July 1994, p. 7
Messina, Alex and Bruer, Mark, ‘A court in camera’, The Age (Melbourne), 3 February 1994, p. 11
Michaels, Julie, ‘Law in the Age of Images’, Boston College Law School Magazine, Fall 2000, p. 19
Michelmore, Karen, ‘NT Government spends $1 m on Falconio case’, Australian Associated Press, 22 April 2004
Milburn, Caroline, ‘Televise High Court: Sir Ninian’, The Age (Melbourne), 20 August 1998, p. 5
Milligan, Louise, ‘Courting danger’, The Australian (Perth), 13–19 November 2003, p. 4
Milligan, Louise,‘Top judge says electronic age risks right to fair trial’, Weekend Australian (Perth), 29–30 November 2003, p. 7
Milligan, Louise,‘Rape call broadcast criticised’, The Australian (Perth), 4–10 December 2003, p. 3
Mills, Kelly, ‘Oracle holds court with casetrack’, The Australian (Perth), 26 November 2002, p. 8
Montgomery, Bruce, ‘Law's Net revolution has beaks surfing’, The Australian (Perth), 31 August 1999, p. 33
Morris, Rachel, ‘Evidence points to regular court TV’, Daily Telegraph (London), 3 September 1999, p. 7
‘Mother says no to trial coverage’, Daily Post (Rotorua), 27 April 1995
‘Motoring case used as TV practice run’, Gisborne Herald (Gisborne), 15 March 1995
Mottram, Murray, Butcher, Steve and Gray, Darren, ‘Putting the County Court on trial’, Sunday Age (Melbourne), 19 November 1995, p. 8
‘Nanny jury fury: poll rejects guilt verdict’, Sunday Mail (London), 2 November 1997, p. 6
‘NATO action is genocide, Belgrade tells UN Court’, The Australian (Perth) 12 May 1999, p. 23
‘Net gets verdict’, The Australian (Perth), 2 August 1999, p. 2
‘New Lord Chancellor urges end to restraints: “judges should be permitted to speak out” ’, The Times (London), 4 November 1987, p. 3
New York Daily News, ‘Will the Unreal OJ Please Rise?’ Herald Sun, 5 January 1997
Newsday, ‘A year on, OJ melodrama shakes the faith’, The Age (Melbourne), 12 June 1995
‘Newspapers out of court’, Wairato Times (Hamilton), 19 May 1995
Nickerson, C., ‘Canadian puts the joke on US’, Boston Globe (Boston), 29 May 2001, p. 1
‘No TV camera at trial’, Wairarapa Times (New Zealand), 28 April 1995
Norton-Taylor, Richard, ‘Your inquisitor awaits, Mr Blair’, Guardian (London), 2 August 2003, p. 1
Noyes, Pete, ‘Court cameras should obey the rules’, Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles), 8 April 1996, p. 73
‘Obituaries, Anna Hauptmann’, The Age (Melbourne), 20 October 1994, p. 16
‘Occupation must end’, Evening Post (Wellington), 14 March 1995
O'Hagan, Maureen, ‘Bid to close hearing in B.C. killings is denied’, Seattle Times (Seattle), 7 December 2002
‘OJKO as pilot allow cameras into Court of Appeal,’ Law Gazette (London), 9 September 2004, www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/pressroundup/view=newsarticle.law?GAZETTENEWSID=191539 at 25 April 2007
‘OJ's trial by media’, Maclean's (Toronto), 31 October 1994, p. 39
‘Old Bailey in Belarus’, The Australian (Perth), 18 February 1999, p. 8
Oldfield, Stewart and Gregory, Peter, ‘Elliott criticises Yorta Claim’, The Age (Melbourne), 31 October 1996
‘Opponents of camera ban pleased by Report’, Legal Intelligencer (Washington), 23 November 1993, p. 5
Palmer, Scot, ‘OJ proves time is right for tribunal TV’, Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 8 October 1995, p. 51
Papas, Nicholas, ‘Sentencing is not that simple’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 5 February 1996
‘Pay-TV court channel possibility in Australia, says Magistrate’, The Press (Christchurch), 20 May 1995
Phillips, John, ‘Milosevic trial stops nation in its tracks’, The Australian (Perth), 14 February 2002, p. 8
‘Photos, radio banned at trial’, Wairato Times (Hamilton), 24 May 1995
Plane, Terry, ‘Suppression city courts secrecy’, The Australian (Perth), 14 November 2001, p. 12
‘Police raise concerns about televised trials’, Ashburton Guardian (New Zealand), 24 March 1995
‘Police speak against cameras in courtrooms’, Dominion (Wellington), 25 March 1995
‘Police want television ban in court’, The Press (Christchurch), 25 March 1995
Power, Samantha, ‘Iraqis should see tyrant's trial up close’, The Australian (Perth), 1 January 2004, p. 11
‘Power shifts to the judges’, Guardian (London), 11 September 2000
Price, Matt, ‘The $44 m battle in courtroom 11’, The Australian (Perth), 18 March 1999, p. 1
Price, Matt,‘Ambush’, The Australian (Perth), 30 October 2003, p. 4
‘Public to peer at new look House of Lords’, West Australian (Perth), 21 January 1999
Purves, Libby, ‘Where is the justice when TV moves in?’, The Times (London), 15 November 1994
‘Radio, photos, banned at trial’, Dominion (Wellington), 24 May 1995
Ramsey, Andrew, ‘Televised hearings plan gets the flick’, The Australian (Perth), 12 December 2001, p. 22
Ratnesar, Romesh, ‘The end of the line’, Time, 9 July 2001, p. 18
Rayner, Moira, ‘Requirements of justice weigh heavily on society's shoulders’, The Age (Melbourne), 15 June 1994, p. 20
Reed, Christopher, ‘Lawyers, lies and videotape’, The Age (Melbourne), 24 September 1993
Reed, Christopher,‘Simpson trial judge lured by the sirens of the screen’, The Age (Melbourne), 18 November 1994, p. 12
Reed, Christopher,‘“Dream team” faces jury probe’, Sunday Age (Melbourne), 8 October 1995, p. 13
Reed, David, ‘WA public can be Net judges’, West Australian (Perth), 6 March 2000, p. 7
Reeves, Phil, ‘OJ: made for TV’, The Age (Melbourne), 17 October 1994, p. 11
‘Right calls on Callinan’, Australian Financial Review (Perth), 22 July 1998, p. 16
Robb, Trevor, ‘Button's long wait nears end’, West Australian (Perth), 23 February 2002, p. 13
Robertson, Geoffrey, QC, ‘Court on candid camera’, Evening Standard (London), 28 September 2000
Robinson, Paul, ‘Contempt of court’, The Age (Melbourne), 12 June 2000, p. 13
Robinson, Paul,‘Federal Court “vendetta” claim’, The Age (Melbourne), 12 June 2000, p. 2
Rodell, Fred, ‘TV or no TV in court?’, New York Times Magazine, 12 April 1964, p. 16
Rollins, Adrian, ‘Australian Broadcasting Corporation first to unveil plans for digital TV’, The Age (Melbourne), 2 September 1998
Rooney, John Flynn, ‘Panel OKs cameras in US Appeals Courts; seen as unlikely here’, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (Chicago), 13 March 1996, p. 2
Rosenberg, Howard, ‘Please stay tuned for “execution of the week” ’, The Age (Melbourne), 30 April 24
Ross, Michael, ‘Lorena Bobbitt acquitted in mutilation of husband’, Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles), 22 January 1994, p. 1
Rowling, Bill, ‘Courtroom or theatre?’, Nelson Evening Mail (New Zealand), 31 March 1995
Rozenberg, Joshua, ‘We must have a Justice Minister’, Daily Telegraph (London), 12 June 2001, p. 16
Rozenberg, Joshua,‘Woolf to delay retirement over legal reforms’, Daily Telegraph (London), 1 August 2003, p. 6
‘Rule of law relies on a free press’, The Australian (Perth), 24 August 2001, p. 12
‘Ruling asserts public access to court papers’, The Australian (Brisbane), 17 October 1997, p. 2
‘Saddam to be tried in absentia’, The Australian (Perth), 12 December 2003, p. 7
Sage, Adam, ‘Bullying and delays blight Hague Tribunal’, Weekend Australian (Perth), 6–7 July 2002, p. 17
Satterly, Mark, ‘Grusome details’, Maclean's (Toronto), 12 June 1995, p. 4
Saunders, David, ‘Televising of the courts wins cautious approval’, The Age (Melbourne), 31 January 1994
Savill, R., ‘Coroner wants TV at drug inquests’, Daily Telegraph (London), 12 June 2001, p. 13
Schmidt, Robert, ‘Federal judges defer decision on cameras in the courtroom’, Legal Times (Detroit), 13 December 1993, p. 21
Schmidt, Robert,‘What's next for cameras?’, Legal Times (Detroit), 9 June 1997, p. 1
Schmitz, Cristin, ‘Judicial Council divided over TV cameras in court “it's like working in a juristic Jurassic Park” says critic’ (2001) 21 Lawyers Weekly (Ontario)
Schmitz, Cristin,‘Ontario's Chief Justice rejects televising trial proceedings’ (2003) 22 Lawyers Weekly (Ontario)
Schulze, Jane, ‘Broadband booted ahead by the AFL’, The Australian (Perth), 24 September 2001, p. 28
Schulze, Jane,‘A digital dead-end’, The Australian (Perth), 5–11 June 2003, p. 3
Scott, Jodie, ‘Who weekly faces contempt charges’, The Australian (Melbourne), 8 June 1994, p. 2
Scott, Jodie,‘Australian Broadcasting Corporation Radio faces contempt charge’, The Australian (Melbourne), 10 June 1994
Scutt, Jocelynne, ‘Denial of the century’, Sunday Age (Melbourne), 8 October 1995
Seenan, Gerard, ‘The British Broadcasting Corporation can show Lockerbie appeal’, Guardian (London), 10 January 2002, p. 4
Sengupta, Kim and Vallely, Paul, ‘The dossier is damned again’, Independent (London), 12 August 2003, p. 1
‘Sex case prosecution time limit possible’, Evening Standard (Palmerston North), 13 March 1995
‘Shaming criminals not the answer’, Canberra Times (Canberra), 23 February 1997
Shearer, Harry, ‘Freak show’, The Age (Melbourne), 6 February 1997, p. A11
Sheehan, Paul, ‘The contempt is mutual, Your Honour’, Sydney Morning Herald (Sydney), 8 March 2004
Simon, Stephanie and Newton, Jim, ‘Judge bans cameras from Simpson trial’, Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles), 24 August 1996, p. 1
Simons, Marlise, ‘Trial reopens pain of 1995 Bosnian massacre’, New York Times (New York), 7 November 2000, p. A3
Simper, Errol, ‘Technology on trial when reporters take liberties in camera’, Weekend Australian (Melbourne), 8–9 August 1992, p. 22
Simper, Errol,‘Aunty finds time for a good cause’, The Australian (Melbourne), 5 February 1998
Simper, Errol,‘Live laws coverage dims’, The Australian (Perth), 21 September 1999, p. 4
Simper, Errol,‘Gallery's old masters given new orders’, The Australian (Perth), 13 June 2002, p. 4
Simper, Errol,‘Acquittal’, The Australian (Melbourne), 30 July 2004, ‘The Australian 40 Years: Heroes and Villains’ 14
‘Simpson case backlash keeps cameras out of other courtrooms’, New York Times (New York), 17 September 1995, p. 35
‘Simpson: judge maintains his gag order’, Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles), 24 August 1996, p. A1
Skeggs, Phil, ‘Warriors buried in forest’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 30 October 1996
Sketch, Melissa, ‘Poise in the face of polemic’, The Times (London), 2 August 2003, p. 4
Smith, Hugh, ‘Is the humanitarian war breaking global law?’, The Australian (Perth), 12 May 1999, p. 27
Smith, Michael, Laville, Sandra and Tweedie, Neil, ‘MOD tried to burn Kelly “media plan”’, Daily Telegraph (London), 2 August 2003, p. 1
Smyth, Chris, ‘Televised trials reveal justice’, The Australian (Perth), June 12–18 2003, p. 7
‘State studies cited; Judicial Conference turns down TV-Radio coverage of Federal Courts’, Communications Daily (Washington), 22 September 1994, p. 3
Steele, John, ‘I've been to hell and back but justice prevailed, says Leslie’, Daily Telegraph (London), 1 August 2003, p. 1
Steele, John,‘Tears of relief: TV presenter breaks down as sex charges dropped’, Daily Telegraph (London), 1 August 2003, p. 1
Stein, Joel, ‘Here come the judges’, Time, 24 August 1998, p. 70
Steketee, Mike, ‘Politicians bar mug shots’, The Australian (Perth), 11 October 2001, p. 8
Stephens, Mark, ‘Justice on the box? The televising of trials panders to the current trend for true-life crimes rather than showing the reality’ (1994) 91 Law Society's Gazette (London) 2
Stevens, Matthew, ‘Amnesty Law Lord resists calls to quit’, The Australian (Perth), 18 January 1999
Stevens, Matthew,‘Reclusive nanny heads for court’, The Australian (Perth), 18 January 1999, p. 3
Stewart, Cameron, ‘Scales of justice: jail for life, then freedom’, The Australian (Brisbane), 12 November 1997, p. 12
Stutchbury, Michael, ‘Free speech proves costly’, Weekend Australian (Perth), 6–7 December 2003, p. 18
Sulkovsky, G., ‘Old Baily in Belarus’, The Australian (Perth), 18 February 1999, p. 8
‘Supreme Court decision was another in long line of injustices’, Moscow-Pullman Daily News (Moscow, Idaho), 23 February 2001, p. 7A
Sutcliffe, Thomas, ‘May justice be done, and be seen to be done’, Independent (London), 3 August 1994, p. 14
Sutherland, Tracy, ‘Conducting his own trial’, Weekend Australian Magazine (Perth), 13–14 July 2002, p. 9
Tame, Adrian and Hewitt, Sue, ‘I know the fate of Azaria’, Sunday Times (Perth), 4 July 2004, p. 1
Te Koha, N., ‘Judge Judy packs a punch’, West Australian (Perth), 1 February 1999, p. 3
Telegraph Group, ‘Photographer called in over Jackson shots’, West Australian (Perth), 16 November 2002, p. 22
‘Televised Bain trial “of little benefit” ’, Gisborne Herald (New Zealand), 27 April 1995
‘Televised trial opposed’, Nelson Evening Mail (New Zealand), 27 April 1995
‘Televised trials may place witnesses at risk: police’, Evening Post (Wellington), 24 March 1995
‘Televising Bernardo’, Maclean's (Toronto), 20 February 1995, p. 17
‘Test for court TV’, Evening Post (Wellington), 15 March 1995
‘Test run for court trials on television’, Bay of Plenty Times (Tauranga), 15 March 1995
‘The jungle of crime’, The Press (Christchurch), 15 March 1995
‘The trouble with the British Broadcasting Corporation’, The Economist, 20 September 2003, p. 44
Thorp, Diana, ‘Take the chance to learn your constitutional Australian Broadcasting Corporation’, The Australian (Brisbane), 30 January 1998, p. 6
‘Three Bosnian Serbs convicted of rape and torture’, Moscow-Pullman Daily News (Moscow, Idaho), 22 February 2001, p. 4A
Tippet, Gary, ‘Papas reverses court TV move’, Sunday Age (Melbourne), 28 August 1994, p. 4
Toohey, Paul, ‘Witch hunt’, The Australian (Perth), 15 July 2000
Toohey, Paul,‘Under pressure for not throwing away the key’, Weekend Australian (Perth), 28–29 June 2003, p. 18
Toohey, Paul,‘Why Lindy must wait for justice’, Bulletin (Sydney), 20 July 2004, p. 20
Towers, Katherine, ‘Trial radio replay bid to demystify law’, The Australian (Brisbane), 5 February 1997
Towers, Katherine,‘Judgement day for historic court’, Weekend Australian (Brisbane), 29–30 August 1998, p. 11
‘Trial by media: the Leslie case raises key questions’, Guardian (London), 1 August 2003, p. 25
‘Trial by video lesson’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 5 November 1996, p. 54
Tunnah, Helen, ‘Highest court can review NZ Court of Appeal judgements’, New Zealand Herald (Auckland), 10 October 2003
Tunnah, Helen,‘Petition last bid to save UK appeals’, New Zealand Herald (Auckland), 10 October 2003, p. 1
Tunnah, Helen,‘“Show Ponies” will gut judiciary’, Weekend Herald (Auckland), 18–19 October 2003, p. A5
Tunnah, Helen and Berry, Ruth, ‘Labour's legal steamroller’, New Zealand Herald (Auckland), 9 October 2003, p. 1
Turner, Lisa, ‘Court cameras pass first test’, New Zealand Herald, 15 March 1995
Turner, Marnie, ‘Judge Hall invites his critics to court’, Gold Coast Bulletin, 22 January 1998
Turner, Marnie,‘Judge Hall: let's talk about sentences’, Gold Coast Bulletin, 22 January 1998, p. 1
Turner, Marnie,‘Judge Hall angered by TV ambush’, Gold Coast Bulletin, 29 January 1998, p. 10
‘TV but no photos for Barlow trial’, Dominion (Wellington), 19 May 1995
‘TV cameras barred from Federal Courts’, Chicago Tribune (Chicago), 22 September 1994, p. 3
‘TV cameras in court a first’, Hawkes Bay Herald Tribune, 14 March 1995
‘TV channels vie for court screenings’, Dominion (Wellington), 4 March 1995, p. 1
‘TV eyes Bain trial’, Dominion (Wellington), 27 April 1995
‘TV firms scrap plans to film trial’, The Press (Christchurch), 29 May 1995
‘TV pulls out’, Evening Post (Wellington), 27 May 1995
‘TVNZ has bid to film Bain trial rejected’, Gisborne Herald, 28 April 1995
‘TVNZ seeks exemption to film Dunedin multiple-murder trial’, The Press (Christchurch), 27 April 1995
‘TVNZ wants to film Bain murder trial’, Evening Standard (Palmerston North), 27 April 1995
‘TVNZ wants to film Bain trial’, Westport, 27 April 1995
‘TV's court debut alarms Australia’, New Zealand Herald, 17 May 1995
Tweedie, Neil, ‘Hutton pledges to leave no stone unturned in hunt for truth behind death of Dr Kelly’, Daily Telegraph (London), 2 August 2003, p. 4
‘UN Court rejects ceasefire plea’, West Australian (Perth), 3 June 1999, p. 20
Van Beynen, Martin, ‘TV firms subdued over filming trials’, The Press (Christchurch), 22 February 1995, p. 5
Van Beynen, Martin,‘Court on TV fails to impress Law Society’, The Press (Christchurch), 16 March 1995
Van Tilburg, E. G. Q., ‘A case for civility’, Maclean's (Toronto), 18 July 1994, p. 4
Varadarajan, Tunku and Bone, James, ‘Nanny's fate rests on judge's conscience’, The Australian (Brisbane), 6 November 1997, p. 10
Vecchio, Mary Ann, ‘Double exposure’, Who (Milsons Point, NSW), 30 October 1995, p. 38
‘Victoria investigates televising of court proceedings’, Australian Current Law News, 4 February 1999
‘Video judges reach verdict’, West Australian (Perth), 28 June 1999, p. 7
‘Voteline results’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 19 September 2001, p. 19
Walker, Tony, ‘Kennedy rape trial takes TV to its intrusive worst’, The Age (Melbourne), 14 December 1991, p. 14
Walker, Tony,‘The debate on the Fourth Estate’, Australian Financial Review, 8 March 2002, p. 75
Wall Street Journal Staff Reporter, ‘High Court won't allow broadcast of election cases’, Wall Street Journal, 28 November 2000, p. A16
Warby, Michael, ‘Stop meddling with the media’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 23 December 1998, p. 19
Warneke, Ross, ‘The case for and against court TV’, The Age (Melbourne), 7 December 1995, p. 4
Webster, Sean, ‘Year-long struggle allows TV only restricted view of the courtroom’, Independent (London), 16 November 1994
Weinstein, Henry, ‘More judges expected to ban cameras in court’, Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles), 14 July 1996, p. B1
Wells, Matt, ‘A tabloid exclusive and Sky One deal: the rebuilding of a tarnished name’, Guardian (London), 1 August 2003, p. 3
Wells, Matt and Dyer, Clare, ‘First step to put cameras into courtroom’, Guardian (London), 17 November 2003
Whittell, Giles, ‘OJ is free, but US justice system remains in the dock’, The Australian (Melbourne), 5 October 1995, p. 11
‘Wilentz demands suppression of newsreels taken by trickery during trial sessions’, New York Times (New York), 2 February 1935, p. 1
Williams, Daryl, ‘Judges must put up their own defence’, Australian Financial Review (Perth), 27 April 2001, p. 57
Williams, Sue, ‘“Cagney and Lacey” of the Falconio case’, The Australian (Perth), 28 May 2004, p. 2
Wilson, Adam, ‘Television is a “disease” ’, Moscow-Pullman Daily News (Moscow, Idaho), 19 April 2001, p. 1
Wilson, Caroline, ‘AFL closer to live cover of tribunal’, The Australian (Perth), 6 May 2004, p. 67
Wilson, Peter, ‘Judge keeps tight rein on McVeigh trial’, The Australian (Brisbane), 3 April 1997, p. 6
Wilson, Peter,‘A law unto themselves’, Weekend Australian (Perth), 6 July 2002, p. 23
Wintour, Patrick, ‘Broadcasters want Kelly Inquiry shown live’, Guardian (London), 1 August 2003, p. 10
Wintour, Patrick and Dyer, Clare, ‘Reshuffle ends job as Lord Chancellor’, Guardian Weekly (Manchester), 19–25 June 2003, p. 8
‘Witness leads jury tour of killing site’, West Australian (Perth), 18 February 1999, p. 21
Wood, Mark, ‘Let us show the full picture’, Independent Review (London), 12 August 2003, p. 10
Woodley, Brian, ‘Boys and girls come out to prey’, The Australian (Brisbane), 9 March 1998
Woods, James, Courier Mail (Brisbane), 19 December 1997
Yaffe, Deborah, ‘T.V. trial restrictions in California urged’, Recorder (US), 26 February 1996, p. 1
‘Yorta Yorta Land Claim lost last century: NSW’, West Australian (Perth), 25 August 1999, p. 45
Zdenkowski, George, ‘Why justice likes a gag and blindfold’, Bulletin (Sydney), 23 June 1992, p. 24
Zdenkowski, George,‘Cameras in court: justice must stay in the picture’, Sydney Morning Herald (Sydney), 23 June 1995, p. 19
A Reporters Guide to Applications pending before the Supreme Court of the United Stateswww.supremecourtus.gov/publicinfo/reportersguide.pdf at 25 April 2007
Australian Broadcasting Corporation Radio National, The Law Report, Court Radio: the Verdict and Legal Aid (1997), www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/8.30/lawrpt/lstories/lr970218.htm at 25 April 2007
Australian Broadcasting Corporation Radio National,The Law Report, Court Radio Part One: the Prosecution Case (1997), www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/8.30/lawrpt/lstories/lr970204.htm at 25 April 2007
Australian Broadcasting Corporation Radio National,The Law Report, Court Radio Part Two: the Defence Case (1997), www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/8.30/lawrpt/lstories/lr970211.htm at 25 April 2007
Australian Broadcasting Corporation Radio National,The Law Report, How Courts Interact with the Media, 10 November 1998, www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/8.30/lawrpt/lstories/lr981110.htm at 25 April 2007
Australian Broadcasting Corporation Radio National,The Law Report, Chronological Index of Transcripts and Summaries (2000), www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/8.30/lawrpt/index/LawReportChronoIdx2000.htm at 25 April 2007
Australian Broadcasting Corporation Radio National,The World Today, Nationals Divided Over One Nation Preferences, 4 September 2001
Australian Broadcasting Corporation Radio National,The Law Report, Inside the High Court, 7 October 2003, www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/8.30/lawrpt/stories/s959203.htm at 25 April 2007
Ad Idem, Electronic Public Access to Court, www.adidem.org/position/Epabc.shtml at 25 April 2007
Administrative Office of the US Courts, Background on Cameras in the Federal Courts, www.judges.org/nccm/research/court_media_rules/admin_office_u_s_cts_cameras.htm at 25 April 2007
Advocates in Defense of Expression in the Media, New Developments, http://adidem.org/index.shtml at 25 April 2007
Australian Broadcasting Authority, News Release: 7 February 2000 American Bar Association; Australian Bar Association Decides to Impose License Conditions on 2UE Sydney (2000), www.aba.gov.au/newspubs/news_releases/archive/2000/7nr2000.shtml at 25 April 2007
Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Australian Broadcasting Corporation Coverage (1998), www.abc.net.au/concon/bcast/default.htm at 25 April 2007
Australian Broadcasting Corporation,Con Con (1998), www.abc.net.au/concon at 25 April 2007
British Broadcasting Corporation Bristol Head Office, ‘The OJ Simpson Trial’, Press Release, 2 September 1994
British Broadcasting Corporation News, ‘Court TV Plan Under Way, 27 December 2000’, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1089017.stm at 25 April 2007
Becker, Judge Edward, Statement of Chief Judge Edward R Becker on behalf of the Judicial Conference of the United States, Administrative Office of the United States Courts (2000), www.uscourts.gov/Press_Releases/becker.pdf at 25 April 2007
Bender, Jay, Cameras in Courts Update, South Carolina Broadcasters Association, www.scba.net/CamerasinCourts.htm at 25 April 2007
Blom-Cooper, Sir Louis, Broadcasting Courts Seminar: Speech by Sir Louis Blom-Cooper QC, Department for Constitutional Affairs (2005), www.dca.gov.uk/consult/courts/speeches/blom-cooper.htm at 25 April 2007
Boyd QC, Colin, ‘The Media, the Public and the Judicial Process: the Kenneth Younger Memorial Lecture’, paper presented at the Playfair Library, Old College, University of Edinburgh, 19 February 2002
Brenner, Donald I., Chief Justice, ‘Televised Court Proceedings’, Press Release, 18 April 2001
British Broadcasting Corporation, Petitioners (No. 1) (High Ct) Scots Law Times 2000, 845, 847 para. 2; British Broadcasting Corporation, Petitioners No. 1 2000 JC 419
British Broadcasting Corporation,Petitioners (No. 2) (High Ct) Scots Law Times 2000, 860
British Broadcasting Corporation,Watch/ Listen to Lockerbie Appeal (2002), http://news.British Broadcasting Corporation.co.UK/1/hi/world/1766508.stm at 25 April 2007
Bryant, Hon. Diana, Chief Justice of the Family Court of Australia, ‘Beyond the Horizon: State of Family Law and the Family Court of Australia’, speech delivered at the Law Council of Australia, Family Law Section, Eleventh National Family Law Conference, Gold Coast, 27 September 2004
Bryant, Hon. Diana, Chief Justice of the family Court of Australia,‘The Future of the Family Court’, speech delivered at the Third Annual Austin Asche Oration, 23 November 2004
Canadian Judicial Council, Council Modifies Position on Cameras in the Courts (2002), http://cjc-ccm.gc.ca/article.asp?id=2422 at 25 April 2007
Canadian Parliamentary Affairs Channel, Canadian Political Channel, www.cpac.ca/ at 25 April 2007
Canadian Parliamentary Affairs Channel,Jurisprudence (2004), www.cpac.ca/forms/index.asp?dsp=template&act=view3&template_id=185&lang=e at 25 April 2007
Catliff, Nick, ‘The Trial and the British Experience’, paper presented at the Cameras in the Courtroom Conference, Southampton Institute, 12 February 1999
CBC News, Media Fight for Access to Pickton Hearing (2002), www.cbc.ca/stories/2002/12/01/pickton_ban021201 at 25 April 2007
Chambers, Hon. Justice Robert, ‘TV in Courtrooms: the New Zealand Experience’, unpublished paper presented at the Australian Supreme and Federal Courts Judges’ Conference, Auckland, New Zealand, 25–29 January 2004
Channel 7, Through My Eyes, 23–24 November 2004
Chesterman, Michael, ‘Contemporary Issues in the Law of Contempt’, paper presented at the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Australian Institute of Judicial Administration, Hobart, 21–23 September 2001
Cooper, John, Broadcasting Courts Seminar: Speech by John Cooper, Department for Constitutional Affairs (2005), www.dca.gov.uk/consult/courts/speeches/cooper.htm at 25 April 2007
Coroner, Findings of Inquest, Court Administration Authority South Australia (2002), www.courts.sa.gov.au/courts/coroner/findings/findings_2002/kunmanara_hunt.finding.htm at 25 April 2007
Courts Consultative Committee, Draft Guidelines for Expanded Media Coverage of Court Proceedings (1999)
Courts Consultative Committee,Guidelines for Expanded Media Coverage of Court Proceedings (2000)
Courts Consultative Committee,2003 New Zealand Guidelines for Media Coverage of Court Proceedings (2003), www.courts.govt.nz/media/guidelines.html at 25 April 2007
CVT.ca, Pickton to be charged in seven more deaths (16 December 2003), www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1071515009457_9?s_name=&no_ads= at 25 April 2007
Darling, Lord (1924) HL Deb. vol. 56 col. 313
Department for Constitutional Affairs, Broadcasting Courts: a Consultation by the Department for Constitutional Affairs (November 2004), www.dca.gov.uk/consult/courts/broadcasting-cp28-04.htm at 25 April 2007
Department for Constitutional Affairs,Discussion Forum Topics (2005), www.dca.gov.uk/consult/courts/discuss/index.htm at 25 April 2007
Dyhrberg, Marie, ‘Television in the Courts: the Time has Come’, paper presented at the Sixth International Criminal Law Congress, Session 6: the Debate ‘TV or Not TV?’, Melbourne, 9–13 October 1996
Eggers, Vickie, ‘Full Stream Ahead: the Michigan Experience’, paper presented at the Court Technology Conference in Kansas City, 28–30 October 2003
Electronic Frontier Canada, www.efc.ca at 25 April 2007
Erica Smishek, Sensational Murder Trial Must Stay Open to Reporters, University of British Columbia Reports (2003), www.publicaffairs.ubc.ca/ubcreports/2003/03jan02/murdertrial.html at 25 April 2007
Falconer, Lord, Broadcasting Courts Seminar, Department of Constitutional Affairs www.dca.gov.uk/consult/courts/speeches/falconer.htm at 25 April 2007
Falconer, Lord,Broadcasting Courts Seminar: Introduction from Lord Falconer, Speech by Lord Falconer, the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs, Department for Constitutional Affairs (2005), www.dca.gov.uk/consult/courts/speeches/falconer.htm at 25 April 2007
Family Court of Australia, Media Centre (2004), www.familycourt.gov.au/presence/connect/www/home/about/media_centre/ at 25 April 2007
Federal Court of Australia and Law Council of Australia, Expert Witness Guidelines Developed Co-operatively by Federal Court and Law Council (1999) www.fedcourt.gov.au/aboutct/media01.html at 25 April 2007
Florida Supreme Court, Court Arguments in Video and Audio and Satellite Downlink, Supreme Court Public Information, www.floridasupremecourt.org/pub_info/index.shtml at 25 April 2007
French, Justice Robert, ‘Television and Radio Broadcasting in the Federal Court of Australia: a Personal Perspective’, paper presented via video link to Broadcasting Courts Seminar, London, 10 January 2005, Broadcasting Courts Seminar: Speech by Justice Robert French by videolink from the Federal Court of Australia, Perth, Department for Constitutional Affairs (2005), www.dca.gov.uk/consult/courts/speeches/french.htm at 25 April 2007
Gleeson, Hon. Justice Murray, ‘Public Confidence in the Courts’, paper presented at the National Judicial College of Australia, Confidence in the Courts Conference, Canberra, February 2007, www.highcourt.gov.av/speeches/cj/cj_9feb07.pdf at 14 April 2007
Global BC et al., ‘Appellant's Factum, R v Pilarinos and Clark’ Court File No. 28823 (2002), available at CBC News TV on Trial (2002)
Guidelines for Media and Public Access to the Courts in Nova Scotia (2004)
Hamish, Cameron, ‘The Televising of Court Proceedings in Australia’, unpublished paper, submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Research Project at the Law School of the University of Technology, Sydney (1999)
Harris, Vicki, Technology for Justice Conference Presentations, Australian Institute of Judicial Administration (CD ROM 1998)
Hope, Lord, ‘Television in the Scottish Courts’, paper presented at Meeting of Chief Justices and Attorneys-General of the European Union, Lisbon, May 1994
Hutton Inquiry, Press Notices: General Matters 24 July 2003 (2003), www.the-hutton-inquiry.org.uk/content/hi-pn240703.htm at 25 April 2007
Hutton Inquiry,Ruling by Lord Hutton (2003), www.the-hutton-inquiry.org.uk/content/rulings/ruling01.htm at 25 April 2007
Idaho State Judiciary, Idaho Administrative Rules, www.isc.idaho.gov/rules/icaridx.htm at 25 April 2007
Innes, Prue, Covering the Courts: a Basic Guide for Journalists, Supreme Court of Victoria (2004), http://supremecourt.vic.gov.au/CA256902000FE154/Lookup/Papers/$file/Covering%20the%20courtsV4Oct04.pdf at 25 April 2007
Internet Guide to the Idaho Courts (2003), www.isc.idaho.gov/media03.pdf at 25 April 2007
Jersey, Chief Justice Paul de, Practice Direction Number 4 of 2004, Supreme Court of Queensland, Recording Devices in Courtrooms, Supreme Court (2004), www.courts.qld.gov.au/practice/pracdir/sc2004_04.pdf at 25 April 2007
Joynson-Hicks, Sir William, Home Secretary (1924–1925) HC Deb. vol. 188 col. 849, 20 November 1925
Judge, Lord, Broadcasting Courts Seminar: Speech by Lord Justice Judge, Department for Constitutional Affairs (2005), www.dca.gov.uk/consult/courts/speeches/judge.htm at 25 April 2007
Judicial Council of California, Photographing, Recording, and Broadcasting in the Courtroom – Guidelines for Judicial Officers (1997)
Judicial Council of California,Camera in Court: Factsheet (June 2003), www.courtinfo.ca.gov/reference/4_25media.htm at 25 April 2007
Judicial Council of California Task Force on Photographing, Recording, and Broadcasting in the Courtroom, Photographing, Recording, and Broadcasting in the Courtroom: Guidelines for Judicial Officers (1997), www.courtinfo.ca.gov/reference/documents/photo.pdf at 25 April 2007
Kentucky Court of Justice, Video Courtrooms in Kentucky, http://courts.ky.gov/aoc/facilities/videocourt.htm at 25 April 2007
Kirby, Hon. Justice Michael, ‘What is it Really Like to be a Justice of the High Court of Australia? A Conversation of Law Students with Justice Kirby’, speech delivered at the Faculty of Law, University of Sydney, 23 May 1997, www.highcourt.gov.au/speeches/kirbyj/kirbyj_sydu.htm at 25 April 2007
Kirby, Hon. Justice Michael,‘The Judiciary in Federation Centenary Year: Good News, Bad News, No News’, paper presented at the Australian Institute of Judicial Administration, Eleventh Australian Institute of Judicial Administration Oration, Sydney, 22 June 2001
Kirby, Hon. Justice Michael,‘Media and Courts: the Dilemma’, speech delivered at the Southern Cross University Graduation Ceremony, 27 April 2002
Kirby, Hon. Justice Michael,‘Take Heart: International Law Comes, Ever Comes’, paper presented at the Conference on International Law, The Challenge of Conflict, Adelaide, 27 February 2004
Kirby, Hon. Justice Michael,‘Law and Justice in Australia: Room for Improvement’, speech delivered at the Queensland University of Technology Law Students’ Society, Brisbane, 3 September 2004
Law Book Company, Laws of Australia (1998), vol. 10 [10.11] ‘Administration of Law and Justice’, ‘Ch 2 Contempt’ [4] 8–11
Law Reform Commission of Canada, Public and Media Access to the Criminal Process, Working Paper 56 (1987), p. 37
Lawlink New South Wales, Media Release: Judges and Laptops (1999), www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/practice_notes/nswsc_pc.nsf/6a64691105a54031ca256880000c25d7/7a0c41c055e586e7ca256885000b407b?OpenDocument at 25 April 2007
Lobez, Susanna, Guidelines for the Occasional Audio Recording of Cases for Radio Documentary Purposes (25 November 1996)
Lord Chancellor's Department, Resolving and Avoiding Disputes in the Information Age, Department for Constitutional Affairs (1998), www.dca.gov.UK/consult/itstrat/civindex.htm at 25 April 2007
Manitoba Courts, Court Policies/Practices affecting Media Coverage, www.manitobacourts.mb.ca/media.html#policies at 25 April 2007
Memory Hole, Break Canada's Pickton Trial News Blackout (2002), www.thememoryhole.org/crime/pickton-blackout.htm at 25 April 2007
Martin, Hon. Wayne, ‘Access to Justice: the Media, the Courts and the Public Record’, address to Australian Press Council Public Meeting, Perth, 22 March 2007, www.supremecourt.wa.gov.au/publications/pdf/Australian_Press_Council_220307.pdf at 14 April 2007
Miles, J. G., QC, ‘Cameras in the Courtroom: Will Televising Trials Educate the Public or Create Injustice? Commentary on a Paper by Selene Mize’, paper presented at the New Zealand Law Conference, Dunedin, 9–13 April 1996; (1996) 2 New Zealand Law Conference Papers 178
Ministers Stick by Supreme Court, British Broadcasting Corporation News (2004), http://news.co./2/hi/news/politics/3545959.stm at 25 April 2007
Ministry of Justice New Zealand, In-Court Media Coverage Guidelines (2003), www.courts.govt.nz/media/ at 25 April 2007
Ministry of Justice New Zealand,New Zealand Guidelines for Media Coverage of Court Proceedings (2004), www.courts.govt.nz/media/guidelines.html at 25 April 2007
Ministry of Justice New Zealand,Supreme Court Media Guidelines (2004), www.courtsofnz.nz/business/documents/SupremeCourt.pdf at 25 April 2007
Moore, Simon, ‘Commentary on Selene Mize's Paper on Cameras in the Courtroom’, paper presented at the 1996 New Zealand Law Conference, Dunedin, 9–13 April 1996
Murray, Paul, Electronic Media Coverage of Courts and the Role of Counsel: a Survey of the Possible Impacts (unpublished LLB Honours dissertation, University of Auckland, January 2003)
National Center for Public Policy Research, ‘The Public has a Right to Know: It's Time to Allow Cameras in Federal Courts’, Press Release, 5 May 1997, www.nationalcenter.org/Cameras597.html at 25 April 2007
National Center for State Courts, How the Public Views the State Courts: a National Survey (1999), www.ncsconline.org/WC/Publications/Res_AmtPTC_PublicViewCrtsPub.pdf at 25 April 2007
National Center for State Courts,Summary of TV Cameras in the State Courts (2002), www.ncsconline.org/WC/Publications/KIS_CameraPub.pdf at 25 April 2007
National Center for State Courts,Knowledge and Information Services, www.ncsconline.org/D_KIS/index.html at 25 April 2007
New Hampshire Supreme Court, Petition of WMUR Channel 9 (13 December 2002), www.courts.state.nh.us/supreme/opinions/2002/0212/wmur156.htm at 25 April 2007
New South Wales Land and Environment Court, Ecourt, https://ecourt.lec.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/eCourt/home.do at 25 April 2007
New York State Defenders’ Association, Cameras in the Courts (2005), www.nysda.org/Hot_Topics/Cameras_in_the_Courts/cameras_in_the_courts.html at 25 April 2007
New York State Unified Court System, Rules of the Chief Administrative Judge (2004), www.courts.state.ny.us/rules/chiefadmin/131.shtml at 25 April 2007
New York State Unified Court System,Rules of the Chief Justice (2004), www.courts.state.ny.us/rules/chiefjudge/29.shtml at 25 April 2007
Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, Pilot Project: Cameras in the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal Rules and Guidelines (1995–6)
Nova Scotia Courts, Media Guide (2003), www.courts.ns.ca/media_access/media.htm at 25 April 2007
Osborn, Elizabeth and Waters, Craig, ‘Courts in the Classroom’, paper presented at the Court Technology Conference in Kansas City, 28–30 October 2003, www.ncsonline.org/D_Tech/ctc/showarticle.asp7.id=61 at 25 April 2007
OZIRIS Productions and SBS Independent, DHUWAY: an Australian Diaspora and Homecoming (1997), www.astarte.com.au/html/australian_history.html dhuway at 25 April 2007
Penlington, Hon. Justice, ‘Television in the Courts: a Personal View’, paper presented at Canadian Judges Conference, 25 August 1998
Provincial Court of British Columbia, Media Access Policy (2001), www.provincialcourt.bc.ca/newsandreferences/mediaaccesspolicy.html at 25 April 2007
Provincial Court of British Columbia,Media Access Policy (2004), www.provincialcourt.bc.ca/downloads/pdf/MediaPolicyApril2004.pdf at 25 April 2007
Public Broadcasting Service, ‘William Rehnquist Interview with Charlie Rose’, KSPS, 18 February 2001, Episode 9635
Puplick, Chris, NSW Privacy Commissioner, ‘Open Justice: Cui Bono?’, address to the Third Australian Institute of Judicial Administration Technology for Justice Conference, 22 October 2002
Radio National, Law Report How Courts Interact with the Media (10 November 1998), www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/8.30/lawrpt/lstories/lr981110.htm at 25 April 2007
Radio-Television News Directors’ Association and Foundation, News Releases: Iowa News Director Testifies September 6 at the Senate Hearing on Cameras in the Courtroom (7 September 2000), www.rtnda.org/news/2000/indtt.shtml at 25 April 2007
Radio-Television News Directors’ Association and Foundation,Cameras in the Court: a State-by-State Guide (2003), www.rtnda.org/foi/scc.shtml at 25 April 2007
Richardson, Sir Ivor, ‘The Courts and the Public’, Australian Institute of Judicial Administration's Sixth Annual Oration in Judicial Administration, Metcalfe Auditorium, Sydney, 25 November 1994
Sackville, Justice Ronald, ‘Access to Justice: the Way Forward’, keynote address at Australian Institute of Judicial Administration Annual Conference, Brisbane, 13 July 2002
Sinclair, Rt Hon. Ian, Constitutional Convention: Transcript of Proceedings (13 February 1998), www.aph.gov.au/hansard/conv/con1302.pdf at 25 April 2007
South Australian Courts Administration Authority, www.courts.sa.gov.au/ at 25 April 2007
South Carolina Judicial Department, Appellate Court Rules, www.judicial.state.sc.us/courtReg/listAPPRules.cfm at 25 April 2007
Special Broadcasting Service, The Trial, (19 September 1998)
Spigelman, Hon. A. C., ‘Reasons for Judgement and the Rule of Law’, paper presented at the National Judicial College, Beijing, 10 November 2003, www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lawlink/supreme_court/11_sc.nsf/pages/SCO_speech_spigelman_101103 at 25 April 2007
Spigelman, Hon. A. C.,‘Open Justice and the Internet’, address at The Law via the Internet 2003 Conference, Sydney, 28 November 2003
Stephen, Rt Hon. Sir Ninian, ‘Address by the Rt Hon Sir Ninian Stephen at the President's Luncheon’, paper presented at the President's Luncheon, 19 August 1998
Stephens, Mark, Broadcasting Courts Seminar: Sceptic No More, an Interview with Mark Stephens by Marcel Berlin, Department for Constitutional Affairs (2005), www.dca.gov.uk/consult/courts/speeches/stephens.htm at 25 April 2007
Stepniak, Daniel, ‘Public Scrutiny, Social Justice and Opposition to the Televising of Court Proceedings’, paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australasian Law Teachers Association, Hobart, October 1994; (1995) 1(3) Proceedings of the 49th Annual Conference of the Australasian Law Teachers Association 1176
Stepniak, Daniel,‘Cameras in Courts: a Case for Extending the US Debate Beyond Constitutional Rights’, paper presented at the Law and Society Association and Research Committee on Sociology of Law, International Meeting on Law and Society, Budapest, 4 July 2001
Stepniak, Daniel,‘The Complementary/Adversarial Roles of Courts and the Media in Audio-Visual Court Reporting: an Australian Perspective’, paper presented at the International Communication Association Conference, Seoul, 15–19 July 2002
Stepniak, Daniel,Electronic Media Coverage of Court Proceedings: Australian Experiences in the Light of Overseas Developments (PhD thesis, University of Melbourne, 2005)
Stepniak, Daniel,‘Overseas Themes and Lessons’, paper presented via video link to the Department for Constitutional Affairs Broadcasting Courts Seminar, London, 10 January 2005, www.dca.gov.uk/consult/courts/speeches/stepniak.htm at 25 April 2007
Straw, Jack, ‘Building a Human Rights Culture’, address to Civil Service College Seminar, 9 December 1999, www.dca.gov.UK/hract/cscspe.htm at 25 April 2007
Supreme Court of British Columbia, Policy on Television in the Courtroom, (2001) (adopted on 9 March 2001), www.courts.gov.bc.ca/sc/TV/TV%20in%20the%20Courtroom.html at 25 April 2007
Supreme Court of British Columbia,Revised Draft Guidelines for Television Coverage of Court Proceedings (2003), www.courts.gov.bc.ca/Sc/TV/Draft%20Guidelines.html at 25 April 2007
Supreme Court of Canada, Frequently Asked Questions (2004), www.scc-csc.gc.ca/faq/faq/index_e.asp at 25 April 2007
Supreme Court of Tasmania, Sentences of the Supreme Court of Tasmania (2003), www.supremecourt.tas.gov.au/decisions/sentences at 25 April 2007
Supreme Court of Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts, ‘Supreme Court Adopts Rule Governing Courtroom Cameras’, News Release, 30 December 1996
Supreme Court of the United States, Argument Transcripts, www.supremecourtus.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts.html at 25 April 2007
Supreme Court of the United States,Opinion, www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/opinions.html at 25 April 2007
Supreme Court of Western Australia, Button v. The Queen, Court of Criminal Appeal (Court of Criminal Appeal (Australian State Court)/112), Media Statements (2002), www.supremecourt.wa.gov.au/content/news/media/2002/media26.aspx at 25 April 2007
Supreme Court of Western Australia,Marquet v. Attorney-General (WA) and anor, Media Statements (2002), www.supremecourt.wa.gov.au/content/news/media/2002/media30.aspx at 25 April 2007
Supreme Court of Western Australia,Farewell Sitting as the WA Supreme Court Judge Joins the UN War Crimes Tribunal Media Statements (2003), www.supremecourt.wa.gov.au/content/news/media/index.htm at 25 April 2007
Supreme Court of Western Australia,Transcript of Ceremonial Sitting Held to Mark Centenary of Supreme Court Building (2003)
Sutherland, Tony, ‘The Internet and Beyond: a New Order for Justice?’, paper presented at the Australian Institute of Judicial Administration Technology for Justice Conference, Melbourne, 9 October 2000
Tasmanian Supreme Courts, www.supremecourt.tas.gov.au/home at 25 April 2007
Taylor, Lord, ‘Justice in the Media Age’, paper presented at the Commonwealth Judges’ and Magistrates’ Association Hertfordshire Symposium, Hertfordshire, 15 April 1995
Thaler, Paul, Director of Journalism and Media, Mercy College, New York, quoted in Robert Schmidt, ‘What's Next for Cameras’, Legal Times, 9 June 1997
Thaler, Paul,The Age (Melb), Justice being seen to be done, www.theage.com.au/news/editorial/justice-being-seen-to-be-done/2007/08/27/11880670D29593.html
Tilgham, Andrew, Bar Calls for Return of Cameras in Court, The Fund for Modern Courts (1 April 2001), www.moderncourts.org/News/Cameras/tu4101cic.html at 25 April 2007
Tipping, Hon. Justice A., ‘Television in Court’, paper presented at the 1996 New Zealand Bar Association Conference, 1996
Trout, Chief Justice Linda Copple, In re: Adoption of Idaho Administrative Rule, Order Adopting Rule 46 (2000), www.isc.idaho.gov/camera46.htm at 25 April 2007
Trout, Chief Justice Linda Copple,In re: Idaho Court Administrative Rule 45, Order Amending Rule (2000), www.isc.idaho.gov/camera2k.htm at 25 April 2007
TVW, Washington State's Public Affairs Network: Audio and Video, www.tvw.org/ at 25 April 2007
Vancouver Independent Media Centre, Metalclad v. United Mexican States NAFTA Appeal, Hour 1 (2001), http://vancouver.indymedia.org/news/2001/02/645.php at 25 June 2004
Wall, Barbara Wartelle, Cameras Allowed at all Open Court Proceedings, New Hampshire Court Rules, Gannett (2003), www.gannett.com/go/newswatch/2003/january/nw0117-11.htm at 25 April 2007
Wallace, Anne, ‘Technology and the Judiciary: the Use of Technology in the Criminal Trial Process’, paper presented at the Fourth Outlook Symposium on Crime in Australia, New Crimes or Responses, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, 21–22 June 2001, www.aic.gov.au/conferences/outlook4/Wallace.pdf at 25 April 2007
Waters, Craig, ‘Netcasting Court Arguments’, paper presented at Seventh National Court Technology Conference, National Center for State Courts, Florida, August 2001
Western Australia Supreme Court, District Court, Family Court, Children's Court and Magistrates’ Court, Guidelines for the Media (1996)
WFSU-TV and Florida Supreme Court, Gavel to Gavel: the Florida Supreme Court Arguments online, http://wfsu.org/gavel2gavel at 25 April 2007
Wood, Hon. James, ‘Royal Commission into the New South Wales Police Service: Use of Technology’, paper presented at the Australian Lawyers’ Conference, Aspen, 5 January 1998
Access to Justice Advisory Committee, Access to Justice: An Action Plan (Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service, 1994)
Adam, G. Stuart, ‘The Charter and the Role of the Media: a Journalist's Perspective’ in and (eds.), The Media, the Courts and the Charter (Toronto, Carswell, 1986), p. 39Google Scholar
(ed.), Freedom of Expression and the Criticism of Judges: a Comparative Study of European Legal Standards (Aldershot, Dartmouth, 2000)Google Scholar
Administrative Office of the Courts, Cameras in the Courtroom: Report on Rule 980 (San Francisco, Judicial Council of California, May 2000)
Administrative Office of the Courts of the State of California, Task Force on Photographing, Recording and Broadcasting in the Courtroom, Report Summary (San Francisco, Judicial Council of California, 1996)
Administrative Office of the Courts Research and Planning Unit, Cameras in the Courtroom (San Francisco, Judicial Council of California, 2000)
Advisory Committee on Cameras in the Courtroom, Final Statistical Report: Cameras in the Courtroom in Nevada (Williamsburg, VA, National Center for State Courts, 1981)
, and , Media Coverage of Court Proceedings, Discussion Document (Wellington, Courts Consultative Committee, 1998)Google Scholar
, and ,The Impact of Television, Radio and Still Photography Coverage of Court Proceedings, Final Report, Report prepared for the Department for Courts (Wellington, Courts Consultative Committee, April 1998)
, and , The Impact of Television, Radio and Still Photography Coverage of Court Proceedings, Interim Report One, Report prepared for the Department for Courts, Department of Human Resource Management Faculty of Business Studies, Massey University (Wellington, Courts Consultative Committee, October 1996)
American Bar Association, Annual Report of the American Bar Association (Chicago, IL, Headquarters Office, 1936)
American Bar Association,Annual Report of the American Bar Association (Chicago, IL, Headquarters Office, 1937)
American Bar Association,Annual Report of the American Bar Association (Chicago, IL, Headquarters Office, 1939)
American Bar Association,Annual Report including Proceedings of the 150th Annual Meeting (Chicago, IL, Headquarters Office, 1982)
American Bar Association Commission on Separation of Powers and Judicial Independence, An Independent Judiciary Report of the American Bar Association; Australian Bar Association Commission on Separation of Powers and Judicial Independence (Washington, American Bar Association, 1997) www.abanet.org/govaffairs/judiciary/report.html at 25 April 2007
, ‘Lessons from an Impeachment’ in The Courts and the Media (Rushcutters Bay, NSW, Halstead, 1999), p. 176Google Scholar
Annual Report of the Proceedings of the Judicial Conference of the United States, March 8–9 (Washington, DC, US GPO, 1962)
Australian Law Reform Commission, Contempt: Disruption, Disobedience and Deliberate Interference, Discussion Paper 27 (Sydney, Australian Law Reform Commission, 1986)
Australian Law Reform Commission,Contempt, Report No. 35 (Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service, 1987)
Australian Law Reform Commission,Technology: What it Means for Federal Dispute Resolution, Issues Paper 23 (Sydney, Australian Law Reform Commission, 1998)
, Cameras and Recorders in Arizona's Trial Courts (Williamsburg, VA, National Center for State Courts, 1983)Google Scholar
Barber, Susanna, ‘News Cameras in the Courtroom: A Review of the Empirical Literature’ in (ed.), Progress in Communication Sciences (Norwood, NJ, Ablex, 1986), p. 177Google Scholar
Beckton, Clare, ‘Freedom of the Press in Canada: Prior Restraint’ in and (eds.), The Media, the Courts and the Charter (Toronto, Carswell, 1986), p. 119Google Scholar
Biondi, Andrea, ‘TV Cameras Access into the Courtroom: a Comparative Note’ in et al. (eds.), The Yearbook of Media and Entertainment Law 1996 (Oxford, Clarendon, 1996), p. 133Google Scholar
Blackshield, Tony and Williams, George, Australian Constitutional Law and Theory (3rd edn, Annandale, NSW, Federation Press, 2002)
, Justice and the Media: Reconciling Fair Trials and a Free Press (Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum, 1997)Google Scholar
Calamai, Peter, ‘The Media and the Court's Public Accountability’ in (ed.), Brian Dickson at the Supreme Court of Canada 1973–1990 (Winnipeg, Canadian Legal History Project, 1998)Google Scholar
, The Supreme Court and the Mass Media: Selected Cases, Summaries, and Analyses (New York, Praeger, 1990)Google Scholar
,Free Press v. Fair Trial: Supreme Court Decisions since 1807 (Westport, CT, London, Praeger, 1994)Google Scholar
, Jurismania: the Madness of American Law (New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Canadian Judicial Council, Annual Report 2000–01 (Ottowa, Ontario, Canadian Judicial Council, 2001), http://cjc-ccm.gc.ca/cmslib/general/CJC2001-2002_E.pdf at 25 April 2007
Canadian Judicial Council,Annual Report 2001–02 (Ottowa, Ontario, Canadian Judicial Council, 2002), http://cjc-ccm.gc.ca/cmslib/general/CJC2001-2002_E.pdf at 25 April 2007
Canadian Judicial Council,Annual Report 2002–03 (Ottowa, Ontario, Canadian Judicial Council, 2003), http://cjc-ccm.gc.ca/cmslib/general/CJC2002-2003_E.pdf at 25 April 2007
, and , The First Amendment and the Fourth Estate (8th edn, New York, Foundation Press, 2001)Google Scholar
, and , Managing Prejudicial Publicity (Sydney, NSW, Law and Justice Foundation of NSW on behalf of the University of NSW and the Justice Research Centre 2001)Google Scholar
(ed.), The Press on Trial: Crimes and Trials as Media Events (Westport, CT, London, Greenwood Press, 1997)Google Scholar
and , Cameras in the Courtroom: Television and the Pursuit of Justice (Jefferson, NC, London, McFarland, 1998)Google Scholar
Courts Administration Authority, Web Page Feasibility Study (Adelaide, Courts Administration Authority, 26 June 1997)
Courts Consultative Committee, Agenda Item 12 Evaluation of the Televising Court Proceedings Pilot Project (New ZealandMinistry of Justice, 1995)
Courts Consultative Committee,Media Coverage of Court Proceedings, Discussion Document (New ZealandMinistry of Justice, 1998)
Cram, Ian, ‘Section 4(2) Postponement Orders: Media Reports of Court Proceedings under the Contempt of Court Australian Capital Territory 1981’ in et al (eds.), The Yearbook of Media and Entertainment Law (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Department for Constitutional Affairs, Broadcasting Courts: a Consultation by the Department for Constitutional Affairs (London, Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2004), www.dca.gov.uk/consult/courts/broadcasting-cp28-04.htm at 25 April 2007
Department for Courts, Media Coverage of Court Proceedings: a Summary Report (Wellington, UMR Insight Ltd, 1998)
Eichelbaum, Sir Thomas, Report: Televising Court Proceedings: the New Zealand Experiment (New Zealand, Courts Consultative Committee, September 1995)
Ernest Short and Associates Inc., Evaluation of California's Experiment with Extended Media Coverage of Courts (Williamsburg, VA, National Center for State Courts, 1981)
and (eds.), Justice and Technology in Europe: How ICT is Changing the Judicial Business (The Hague, London, Kluwer International, 2001)Google Scholar
Federal Court of Australia, Annual Report 1994–1995 (Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service, 1995)
Federal Court of Canada, Annual Report (Toronto, R. De Boo, 1994)
, Human Rights in Australia, Treaties, Statutes and Cases (Chatswood, NSW, LexisNexis Butterworths, 2003)Google Scholar
and (eds), Covering the Courts: Free Press, Fair Trials, and Journalistic Performance (New Brunswick, NJ, London, Transaction Publishers, 1998)Google Scholar
Glasbeek, H. J., ‘Comment: Entrenchment of Freedom of Speech for the Press – Fettering of Freedom of Speech of the People’ in and (eds.), The Media, the Courts and the Charter (Toronto, Carswell, 1986), p. 100Google Scholar
, TV or Not TV: Television, Justice, and the Courts (New York, New York University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
, Report of the Courts Consultative Committee for the Year Ending 31 December 1995 (New Zealand Ministry of Justice, 1996)Google Scholar
, and , Australian Constitutional Law Materials and Commentary (7th edn, Chatswood, NSW, LexisNexis Butterworths, 2004)Google Scholar
Henningham, John, ‘The High Court and the Media’ in (ed.), Centenary Essays for the High Court of Australia (Chatswood, NSW, LexisNexis Butterworths, 2004)Google Scholar
Henry, Daniel J., ‘Electronic Public Access to Court: a Proposal for its Implementation Today’ in and (eds.), The Media, the Courts and the Charter (Toronto, Carswell, 1986), p. 441Google Scholar
Henry, Daniel J.,‘Electronic Public Access to Court: an Idea whose Time Has Come’ in , and (eds.), Open Justice: La Transparence dans le Système Judiciaire (Toronto, Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice, 1995), p. 389Google Scholar
Himmelstein, Hal, ‘Television News and the Television Documentary’ in (ed.), Television: the Critical View (4th edn, New York, Oxford University Press, 1987)Google Scholar
, The Impact of Television, Radio and Still Photography Coverage of Court Proceedings, Interim Report One (New Zealand, 1998)Google Scholar
House of Representatives Select Committee on Televising the House of Representatives, Parliament of Australia, The Eyes have It!: Inquiry into the Televising of the House of Representatives and its Committees (Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service, 1991)
House of Representatives Standing Committee on the Televising of the House of Representatives, To See or Not to See – This is the Answer: Review of Arrangements for the Televising of the House of Representatives (Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service, 1993)
Hutton, Rt Hon. Lord, Investigation into the Circumstances Surrounding the Death of Dr David Kelly (Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2003) www.the-hutton-inquiry.org.UK at 25 April 2007
Information Service National Center for State Courts, Summary of TV Cameras in the State Courts (Williamsburg, VA, National Center for State Courts, 1995)
, Television in New Zealand Courts: the Experience So Far (Supreme Court of Victoria, 1996)Google Scholar
, Open Justice: a Critique of the Public Trial (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Molly Treadway, Electronic Media Coverage of Courtroom Proceedings: an Evaluation of the Pilot Program in Six District Courts and Two Courts of Appeals, Report of the Federal Judicial Center to the Committee on Administrative and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States (Washington, DC, 4 November 1993)
Johnson, Molly Treadway,Electronic Media Coverage of Courtroom Proceedings: Effects on Witnesses and Jurors, Supplemental Report of the Federal Judicial Center to the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management, (Washington, DC, 18 January 1994)
and , Electronic Media Coverage of Federal Civil Proceedings: an Evaluation of the Pilot Program in Six District Courts and Two Courts of Appeals (Washington, DC, Federal Judicial Center, 1994)Google Scholar
Joint Select Committee on Certain Aspects of the Operation and Interpretation of the Family Law Australian Capital Territory, The Family Law Australian Capital Territory 1975: Aspects of its Operation and Interpretation (Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service, January 1993)
Judicial Council of California, Report by Task Force on Photographing, Recording and Broadcasting in the Courtroom (San Francisco, Judicial Council of California, February 1996)
Judicial Council of California,Cameras in the Courtroom: Report on Rule 980 (San Francisco, Judicial Council of California, May 2000)
, Murder, Courts, and the Press: Issues in Free Press/Fair Trial (rev edn, Carbondale, Southern Illinois University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
, The Provision of Court Services for Court Customers in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom: a Literature Review and Annotated Bibliography (New ZealandMinistry of Justice, 1996)Google Scholar
Kriven, Sylvia, Quo Vadis? A Report on a Visit to the United States of America, 2 July to 17 July 2001, and Recommendations for Change in the Communications Branch of the Courts Administration Authority (South Australia Courts Administration Authority, August 2001)
Lamek, P. S. A., ‘Comment: a Middle Way’ in and (eds.), The Media, the Courts and the Charter (Toronto, Carswell, 1986), p. 499Google Scholar
Law Reform Commission of Canada, Public and Media Access to the Criminal Process, Working Paper 56 (Ottowa, LRCC, 1987)
Law Reform Commission of Ireland, Report on Contempt of Court (Oxford, Professional Books, 1994)
Law Reform Commission of New South Wales, Proceedings of Court and Commissions Television Filming, Sound Recording and Public Broadcasting, Sketches and Photographs (Sydney, LRCNSW, 1984)
Law Reform Commission of Western Australia, Review of the Law of Contempt, Report No. 93 (Perth, WA, LRCWA, 2003)
Lederman, Sidney N., O'Kelly, Patrick and Grottenhaler, Margaret, ‘Confidentiality of News Sources’ in and (eds.), The Media, the Courts and the Charter (Toronto, Carswell, 1986), p. 227Google Scholar
Lepofsky, David, ‘Cameras in the Courtroom: Not Without My Consent’ in , and (eds.), Open Justice: La Transparence dans le Système Judiciaire (Toronto, Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice, 1995), p. 333Google Scholar
Linden, Allen M., ‘Limitations on Media Coverage of Legal Proceedings: a Critique and Some Proposals for Reform’ in and (eds.), The Media, the Courts and the Charter (Toronto, Carswell, 1986), p. 301Google Scholar
and , Crime and Local Television News: Dramatic, Breaking, and Live from the Scene (Mahwah, NJ, London, Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002)Google Scholar
, Continental Divide: the Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada (New York, London, Routledge, 1990)Google Scholar
Manson, Allen, ‘Freedom of the Press and Juries, Prisons and Prisoners’ in and (eds.), The Media, the Courts and the Charter (Toronto, Carswell, 1986), p. 355Google Scholar
Martin, Robert, ‘Contempt of Court: the Effect of the Charter’ in and (eds.), The Media, the Courts and the Charter (Toronto, Carswell, 1986), p. 207Google Scholar
Mason, Paul, Report on the Impact of Cameras at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (The Hague, Southampton, ICTY and Centre for Media and Justice, 2000)
Media Coverage of Court Proceedings Pilot Evaluation Committee, Media Coverage of Court Proceedings, Introduction and Summary of Research Findings (New Zealand, Courts Consultative Committee, August 1998)
Media in Courts Monitoring Committee, Expanded Media Coverage of Court Proceedings, a Consultation Paper (New Zealand, 2001)
, No Sense of Place: the Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior (New York, Oxford University Press, 1985)Google Scholar
et al., Managing Notorious Trials (2nd edn, Williamsburg, VA, National Center for State Courts, 1998)Google Scholar
and , Law of Mass Communications: Freedom and Control of Print and Broadcast Media (4th edn, Mineola, NY, Foundation Press, 1982)Google Scholar
New South Wales Law Reform Commission, Community Law Reform Program: Proceedings of Courts and Commissions Television Filming, Sound Recording and Public Broadcasting, Sketches and Photographs, Issues Paper 4 (Sydney, Government Printer, 1984)
New South Wales Law Reform Commission,Community Law Reform Program: Sound Recording of Proceedings of Courts and Commissions: The Media, Authors and Parties, Report No. 39 (Sydney, NSWeekly Law Reports (UK)C, 1984)
New South Wales Law Reform Commission,Contempt by Publication, Discussion Paper 43 (Redfern, NSW, NSWeekly Law Reports (UK)C, 2000)
New South Wales Law Reform Commission,Contempt by Publication, Report No. 100 (Sydney, NSWeekly Law Reports (UK)C, 2003)
New York State Committee to Review Audio Visual Coverage of Court Proceedings, An Open Courtroom: Cameras in New York Courts (Bronx, NY, Fordham University Press, 1997)
New York State Defenders Association, The Intrusion of Cameras in New York's Criminal Courts: a Report by the Public Defense Backup Center (New York, New York State Defenders’ Association, 1989)
New York State Defenders Association,Cameras in New York Courtrooms White Paper (New York, New York State Defenders’ Association, 1999), www.nysda.org/Hot_Topics/Cameras_in_the_Courts/03_Cameras_in_NY_Courts_NYSDA_1999_.pdf at 25 April 2007
New York Times, 36 Days: the Complete Chronicle of the 2000 Presidential Election Crisis (New York, Times Books, 2001)
New Zealand Courts Consultative Committee, Report of the Courts Consultative Committee for the Year Ending 31 December 1995 (New Zealand, 1995)
New Zealand Law Commission, Juries in Criminal Trials, Report No. 69 (Wellington, Law Commission, 2001), www.lawcom.govt.nz at 25 April 2007
Newfoundland Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Criminal Justice System, Hughes Inquiry (St John's, Newfoundland, Office of the Queen's Printer, June 1989)
Nicol, Andrew and Rogers, Heather, ‘Media Reporting Restrictions’ in et al. (eds.), The Yearbook of Media and Entertainment Law (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1996), p. 349Google Scholar
Nova Scotia Royal Commission on the Donald Marshall Jr Prosecution, Marshall Report (Halifax, NS, NSRC, December 1989)
Ontario Bench and Bar Council, Television in the Courts: Background Paper 6 (Ontario, September 1983)
, Courts and the Public (Carlton South, Victoria, Australian Institute of Judicial Administration, 1998)Google Scholar
Parliament of New South Wales, Inquiry into a Proposal for the Televising of Public Hearings of the Independent Commission against Corruption (Sydney, Parliament of New South Wales, 1990)
Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, To See or Not to See, This is the Answer (Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service, 1993)
Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia,Radio and Television Broadcasting of Parliamentary Proceedings (Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service, 1995)
Parliament of Victoria, Law Reform Committee, Technology and the Law (Melbourne, Government Printer, 1999)
Phillips, Bruce, Report on the Use of Broadcasting Equipment in the Federal Court of Australia (Federal Court of Australia, December 1993–December 1997)
Phillips, Bruce,‘Television in the Federal Court of Australia 1994–2004’, paper prepared in response to November 2004 ‘Broadcasting Courts: A Consultation by the Department for Constitutional Affairs: Federal Court of Australia’ (24 December 2004)
, The Courts and the News Media (6th edn, San Francisco, CA, California Judges Association, 1993)Google Scholar
Proulx, Michel, ‘Comment: No Cameras Please’ in and (eds.), The Media, the Courts and the Charter (Toronto, Carswell, 1986), p. 491Google Scholar
Public Affairs Committee of the General Council of the Bar, Televising the Courts: Report of a Working Party of the Public Affairs Committee of the General Council of the Bar (London, Bar Council of England and Wales, May 1989)
, and , The Last Word: Media Coverage of the Supreme Court of Canada (Vancouver, UBC Press, 2006)Google Scholar
and , Communication and Litigation: Case Studies of Famous Trials (Carbondale, Southern Illinois University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, Inquiry into the Rights and Obligations of the Media, Part IV of a Submission by Communications Law Centre: ‘The Right to Privacy and the Right to Know’ (Australia, 1995)
Short, Ernest and Associates, Evaluation of California's Experiment with Extended Media Coverage of Courts (Williamsburg, VA, National Center for State Courts, September 1981)
Small, Allison L., Cameras in the Courtroom: Pilot Project Preliminary Report and Survey Results, memorandum to Court's Committee on Cameras in the Courtroom, Canadian Federal Court of Appeals (6 March 1997)
Stephen, Sir Ninian, ‘Televising of Proceedings’ in , and (eds.), The Oxford Companion to the High Court of Australia (South Melbourne, Vic., Oxford University Press, 2001), p. 663Google Scholar
, Electronic Media Coverage of Courts: a Report Prepared for the Federal Court of Australia (Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia, 1998)Google Scholar
Stepniak, Daniel,‘British Justice: Not Suitable for Public Viewing?’ in (ed.), Criminal Visions: Media Representations of Crime and Justice (Cullompton, Willan, 2003), p. 254Google Scholar
Stepniak, Daniel,‘Cameras in Courts: for Whose Benefit?’ in (ed.), Legal Explorations: Essays in Honour of Professor Michael Chesterman (Pyrmont, NSW, Lawbook Co., 2003), p. 239Google Scholar
and , Cameras in State Courts: a Comparative Examination of Experimental Versus Permanent Usage by State (American Political Science Association, 1994)Google Scholar
, The Watchful Eye: American Justice in the Age of the Television Trial (Westport, CT, Praeger, 1994)Google Scholar
, ‘Public Perceptions of the Civil Justice System’ in Ontario Law Reform Commission, Rethinking Civil Justice: Research Studies for the Civil Justice Review (Toronto, Ont., Ontario Law Reform Commission, 1996)Google Scholar
, Best Practices for Television Journalists: a Handbook for Reporters, Producers, Videographers, News Directors and Other Broadcast Professionals on How to Be Fair to the Public (Nashville, TN, Freedom Forum, 2000)Google Scholar
, Seeking Civil Justice: a Survey of People's Needs and Experiences (London, National Consumer Council, 1995)Google Scholar
Winterton, George, ‘The Separation of Powers as an Implied Bill of Rights’ in (ed.), Future Directions in Australian Constitutional Law (Sydney, Federation Press, 1994), p. 185Google Scholar
Wood, Hon. James, Royal Commission into the NSW Police Service Final Report (Government of the State of New South Wales, 1997), www.pic.nsw.gov.au/Reports_List.asp?type=Royal at 25 April 2007
Woolf, Rt Hon. Lord, Access to Justice: Final Report to the Lord Chancellor on the Civil Justice System in England and Wales (Lord Chancellor's Department, 1996), www.dca.gov.uk/civil/final/ at 25 April 2007
, Innocence Regained: the Fight to Free Lindy Chamberlain (Annandale, NSW, Federation Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Young, Warren, Cameron, Neil and Tinsley, Yvette, Juries in Criminal Trials, Part Two, A Summary of the Research Findings, Law Commission of New Zealand Preliminary Paper 37 (Wellington, Law Commission, 1999), vol. 2
, ‘Televising Court Trials in Canada: We Stand on Guard for a Legal Apocalypse’ (1979) 5 Dalhousie Law Journal694Google Scholar
‘Across USA’ (1996) 96 Lawyers Weekly USA198
, ‘The Thicket of Rules North of the Border: Canadian Perspectives on a Free Press and Fair Trials’ (1998) WinterMedia Studies Journal24 (New York)Google Scholar
, ‘TV and the Supreme Court: Broadcasters Want Access, but will They Deliver Serious Coverage?’ (2003) 5 Columbia Journalism Review, www.cjr.org/issues/2003/5/tv-aho.asp at 25 April 2007Google Scholar
, ‘Televising of Federal Hearing is Permitted; Judge Allows First Use of Cameras since 1944’ (1996) 215(42) New York Law Journal2Google Scholar
and , ‘Publication Restrictions and Criminal Proceedings’ (1994) 36 Criminal Law Quarterly168 (Agincourt, Ontario)Google Scholar
American Bar Association Committee on Professional Ethics and Grievances, ‘Formal Opinion 67 (March 21, 1932)’ (1932) 18 American Bar Association Journal550
American Bar Association Lawpoll, ‘Lawyers aren't Convinced that TV Belongs in Courtrooms’ (1979) 65 American Bar Association Journal1306
, ‘American Bar Association; Australian Bar Association Members, Media Debate Camera Issue’ (1982) 68 American Bar Association Journal256Google Scholar
and , ‘Justice by the Consent of the Governed’ (1998) WinterMedia Studies Journal80 (New York)Google Scholar
, ‘Would Publicly Televising Trials Enhance or Degrade the Trial Process?’ (1999) 1 Western Carolina Journal of Law and Justice, www3.wcu.edu/~mabel/austin.htm at 25 April 2007Google Scholar
, ‘The Play's the Thing: an Unscientific Reflection on Courts under the Rubric of Theatre’ (1975) 28 Stanford Law Review81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Bar Paves Way for TV Courts’ (1990) 87(6) Law Society5 (London)
‘Bar Support for Television Pilot Scheme’ (1991) 141 New Law Journal190 (London)
‘Bar Ushers in Televised Trials’ (1989) 133 Solicitors Journal668 (London)
‘Bar Working Party Reports’ (1989) May–June Counsel5 (London)
, ‘News Cameras in the Courtroom: a Review of the Empirical Literature’ (1986) 8 Progress in Communication Sciences177 (Norwood, NJ)Google Scholar
,‘An Analysis and Review of News Cameras in the Courtroom: a Free Press-Free Trial Debate’ (1989) 11(2) Communications and the Law61 (Westport, CT)Google Scholar
, ‘Good Morning, Folks: We Present “the Case of the Month!”’ (1963) 49 American Bar Association Journal548Google Scholar
, ‘The United Kingdom’ (2004) 12 William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal687 (Williamsburg, VA)Google Scholar
, ‘In the Wake of Chandler v Florida: a Comprehensive Approach to the Implementation of Cameras in the Courtroom’ (1981) 33 Federal Communications Law Journal117 (Los Angeles)Google Scholar
, ‘Letting the Public Know: the Educative Role of the Courts’ (1994) 1 Canberra Law Review165Google Scholar
,‘Letting the Public Know: Courts Should Promote Greater Public Understanding of their Functions’ (1994) 29(6) Australian Lawyer24Google Scholar
,‘“Opening Address” at Courts and Media Forum Sydney 1998’ (1999) 1 University of Technology Sydney Law Review7Google Scholar
, ‘The Checking Value in First Amendment Theory’ (1977) American Bar Foundation Research Journal523Google Scholar
,‘Scots Criminal Procedure and the Lockerbie Trial’ (1999) 11 International Legal Perspectives11 (Portland, OR)Google Scholar
, and , ‘Cameras in Courtroom: the Effects of Media Coverage on Witness Testimony and Juror Perceptions’ (1990) 14 Law and Human Behavior489 (New York)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Court Technology in Canada’ (2004) 12 William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal681 (Williamsburg, VA)Google Scholar
, ‘Address by William J Brennan, Jr Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States’ (1979) 32 Rutgers Law Review173Google Scholar
‘Broadcasters Keep Fighting to Televise Trials’ (1994) 18(3) The News Media and the Law62 (Washington)
‘Broadcasting: No Televising of Trial: Devolution Issues’ (2000) Winter Public Law703 (London)
‘Broadcasting of Judicial Proceedings from Court Rooms Condemned’ (1932) 18 American Bar Association Journal761
, ‘The Legal and Policy Implications of Courtroom Technology: the Emerging English Experience’ (2004) 12 William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal699 (Williamsburg, VA)Google Scholar
, ‘From the Chief Justice’ (2004) 4(6) Courtside: Newsletter of the Family Court of Australia2Google Scholar
‘Call to Televise Trials’ (1989) 86(20) Law Society6 (London)
‘Camera Access Advances in Oklahoma, New York’ (2000) 24(2) The News Media and the Law13 (Washington)
‘Cameras Barred from Smith Double-Murder Trial’ (1995) 19(3) The News Media and the Law12 (Washington)
, ‘Reasons for Judgement: Some Consumer Perspectives’ (2003) 77 Australian Law Journal62Google Scholar
, ‘Access to the Courts and its Implications’ (1999) 1 University of Technology Sydney Law Review127Google Scholar
‘Can TV Crews be Trusted in Court?’ (1994) Northern Law News1 (Auckland)
, ‘Supreme Court Releases Audio Tape of Affirmative Action Arguments’ (2003) 27(2) The News Media and the Law34, www.rcfp.org/news/mag/27-2/bct-battlesf.html at 25 April 2007 (Washington)Google Scholar
‘Canon 35 Reaffirmed’ (1963) 49 American Bar Association Journal357
, ‘Journalists’ Efforts to Roll Cameras into Courtrooms Get Mixed Results’ (2002) 26(2) The News Media and the Law19 (Washington)Google Scholar
, ‘An Open Courtroom: Should Cameras be Permitted in New York State Courts’ (1998) 18 Pace Law Review297 (White Plains, NY)Google Scholar
, ‘Rights or Wrongs? The Human Rights Australian Capital Territory in the Courts’ (2005) 79 Australian Law Journal36Google Scholar
, ‘Considering Cameras in the Courtroom’ (1995) 39 Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media555 (Washington, DC)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Controlling Courtroom Publicity: Common Law Strategies’ (1985) International Legal Practitioner47 (London)Google Scholar
,‘Contempt by the Media: How the Courts Define It’ (1986) Australian Quarterly388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,‘OJ and the Dingo: How Media Publicity relating to Criminal Cases Tried by Jury is Dealt with in Australia and America’ (1997) 45 American Journal of Comparative Law109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,‘Media Prejudice during a Criminal Jury Trial: Stop the Trial, Fine the Media, or Why Not Both’ (1999) 5 University of Technology Sydney Law Review1Google Scholar
‘Circuit Courts to Determine Camera Coverage of Hearings: State Courts also Rule to Allow Cameras’ (1996) 20(2) The News Media and the Law34 (Washington)
‘Code for Media Coverage of Court Proceedings’ (2000) 544 LawTalk10 (Wellington)
and , ‘People v Simpson: Perspectives on the Implications for the Criminal Justice System: the Agony of Victory and the Ethics of Lawyer Speech’ (1996) 69 Southern California Law Review1627Google Scholar
Committee on Professional Ethics, ‘Opinion 67: Judicial Ethics – Impropriety of Permitting Radio Broadcasting of Court Proceedings’ (1932) 18 American Bar Association Journal549
‘Controversies Continue over Camera Access to Courts’ (2000) 24(3) The News Media and the Law (Washington)
, ‘Don't Get Trampled by Media Circus’ (1997) 83, Feb American Bar Association Journal8Google Scholar
‘Court Rules Judge Should Review Notes’ (1992) 16(4) The News Media and the Law35 (Washington)
‘Court TV Deterrent?’ (1988) 138 New Law Journal906 (London)
‘Courts versus the Media’ (1998) 36(10) Law Society Journal25 (London)
, ‘Cameras in Courts do not Adversely Affect Conduct of Court Proceedings’ (1991) 205(83) New York Law Journal40Google Scholar
, ‘Television in our Courts: the Proven Advantages, the Unproven Dangers’ (1980) 64 Judicature85 (Chicago)Google Scholar
‘Defense News’ (2000) 67 Defense Counsel Journal429 (Chicago)
and , ‘The Accused: a Documentary of a Jury Trial’ (2003) 30(3) Brief17 (Law Society of Western Australia)Google Scholar
, ‘Bringing Down the Curtain on Courtrooms’ (1994) 16(10) Amercian Journalism Review50Google Scholar
, ‘Generic Prejudice: How Drug War Fervor Threatens the Right to a Fair Trial’ (1991) 40 American University Law Review821Google Scholar
, ‘The Courts and the Media: What Reforms are Needed and Why’ (1999) 1 University of Technology Sydney Law Review25Google Scholar
,‘The Judicial Role in the New Millennium’ (2001) 10 Journal of Judicial Administration133 (North Ryde, N.S.W.)Google Scholar
, ‘An Alternative View of Media Judiciary Relations: What the Non Legal Evidence Suggests about the Fair Trial-Free Press Issue’ (1989) 18 Hofstra Law Review1 (Hamstead, NY)Google Scholar
, ‘The Televised Mediated Trial: Formal and Substantive Characteristics’ (1989) 37 Communication Quarterly305 (University Park, PA)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Colombian Journalists Become Pawns in Armed Struggle’ (2000) First Quarter IPI Report16 (Manchester)Google Scholar
, ‘Media Access to Courts in South Australia’ (1992) 12(2) Communications Law Bulletin23 (NSW)Google Scholar
and , ‘Electronic Coverage of the Courts: Exceptions to Exposure’ (1987) 75 Georgetown Law Journal1633Google Scholar
, ‘State Supreme Court Takes on the Media's Candid Cameras’ (1997) California Lawyer24Google Scholar
, ‘Lights, Camera, Action: Computer-Animated Evidence Gets its Day in Court’ (1993) 34 Boston College Law Review1087Google Scholar
, ‘Televised Justice: Considered Proposals for the Controlled Use of Television Cameras in the United Kingdom Courts’ (1997) 11(4) Contemporary Issues in Law23 (London)Google Scholar
‘Evidence – Evidence (Audio Visual and Audio Linking) Australian Capital Territory 1997 (Vic)’ (1998) Commonwealth Law Bulletin55 (London)
‘“Fair Trial” Concerns Prevail over Camera Access’ (1995) 19(3) The News Media and the Law11 (Washington)
‘Federal Appellate Courts Wary of Camera Access’ (1996) 20(3) The News Media and the Law21 (Washington)
‘Federal Court Camera Test Planned’ (1990) The News Media and the Law31 (Washington)
, ‘Fear and Loathing: the Courts and the Media’ (1995) 5 Journal of Judicial Administration39 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
, ‘Through the Camera Lens: When Justice is Not Seen to be Done’ (1995) 69 Australian Law Journal477Google Scholar
, ‘The Use of Publicity as a Criminal Sanction against Business Corporations’ (1971) 8 Melbourne University Law Review107Google Scholar
‘Flemington's Cooperative Darkroom Produced 120 Pictures in 80 Minutes’ (1935) Editor and Publisher5 (New York)
‘Flight Attendant Loses Appeal over Surreptitious Taping’ (1997) 20(4) The News Media and the Law30 (Washington)
, ‘The Courts and the Media: What Reforms are Needed and Why’ (1999) 8 University of Technology Sydney Law Review1Google Scholar
, ‘Judges Restrict Camera Access in Courtrooms’ (2002) 26(4) The News Media and the Law12 (Washington) www.rcfp.org/news/mag/26-4/bct-camsrndu.html at 25 April 2007Google Scholar
, ‘Pilot Project for Televising of Court Proceedings Proposed’ (1994) LawTalk6 (Wellington)Google Scholar
and , ‘The Effects of Pretrial Publicity: the Bernardo Case’ (1996) Canadian Journal of Criminology253Google Scholar
, ‘A Moment of Change: Personal Reflections on the National Native Title Tribunal 1994–98’ (2003) 27(2) Melbourne University Law Review488Google Scholar
, ‘Criminal Law Symposium: Publicity in High Profile Criminal Cases’ (1998) 10 St Thomas Law Review507 (Miami)Google Scholar
, ‘Cameras in the Courtroom: Guidelines for State Criminal Trials’ (1985–86) 84 Michigan Law Review475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,‘Trial of Alleged Terrorist Spotlights Camera Issue’ (2002) 26(1) The News Media and the Law21 (Washington)Google Scholar
, ‘A Lively Public Issue: Canon 35 in the Light of Recent Events’ (1957) 43 American Bar Association Journal420Google Scholar
, ‘Trial by Television: Are We at the Point of No Return?’ (1980) 63 Judicature419 (Chicago)Google Scholar
,‘Cameras on Trial: the “O.J. Show” Turns the Tide’ (1995) 39 Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media562 (Washington, DC)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Video-Technology in the Criminal Courts of the United Kingdom and Canada’ (1989) 53 Journal of Criminal Law215 (London)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Us Judicial Conference Votes to Allow Cameras into Appellate Courts’ (1996) 215(49) New York Law Journal2Google Scholar
, ‘Justice and TV: Some Thoughts on Congressional Investigations’ (1952) 38 American Bar Association Journal15Google Scholar
, ‘Doing Justice with Cameras in the Courts’ (1998) WinterMedia Studies Journal32 (New York)Google Scholar
, ‘The Standards of the Legal Profession: Canon 35 Should Not be Surrendered’ (1962) 48 American Bar Association Journal615Google Scholar
, ‘Memorandum of Law of Regional News Networks in Support of its Motion for Limited Intervention and Application to Provide Audio-Visual Coverage of Trial Proceedings’ (2000) 63 Albany Law Review1002Google Scholar
, ‘Some Object Lessons on Publicity in Criminal Trials’ (1940) 24 Minnesota Law Review (Journal of the State Bar Association)453Google Scholar
and , ‘Media Coverage of Law: Its Impact on Juries and the Public’ (1991) 35 American Behavioral Scientist136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Cameras and the Need for Unrestricted Electronic Media Access to Federal Courtrooms’ (1996) 69 Southern California Law Review827Google Scholar
, ‘Don't Rush to Judgement on Court TV in the OJ Simpson Aftermath’ (1995) 3 Media Law Reporter1 (Washington, DC)Google Scholar
, ‘The Mass Media and the Criminal Process: a Public Service or a Public Circus?’ (1992) New Zealand Law Journal271Google Scholar
and , ‘Videotaped Trial Transcripts for Juror Deliberations’ (1998) 82 Judicature84 (Chicago)Google Scholar
, ‘Televising of Court Proceedings Pilot under Evaluation’ (1996) LawTalk9 (Wellington)Google Scholar
,‘Television Coverage of Court Proceedings: Pilot Extended and Rules’ (1996) LawTalk44 (Wellington)Google Scholar
, ‘Trial by Television: Television Broadcasting within the Judicial System’ (1995) 77 Media International Australia120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House of Delegates, ‘Proceedings of the House of Delegates: Mid Year Meeting, February 25–26, 1952’ (1952) American Bar Association Journal425
House of Delegates,‘Proceedings of the 1963 Midyear Meeting of the House of Delegates’ (1963) American Bar Association Journal385
House of Delegates,‘Cameras in Court’ (1979) American Bar Association Journal340
‘House Pulls the Plug on Cameras in Court’ (1979) 65 American Bar Association Journal333
, ‘Court System Panel: the Media, Attorneys, and Fair Criminal Trials’ (1995) 4 Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy61Google Scholar
, ‘Courtroom Coverage: the Effects of Being Televised’ (1977) 21 Journal of Broadcasting487 (Washington)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffman, Justice Richard D., (1996) June–July Judicial Council of California Court News
,‘Trial Judges May Hold Key to Effectiveness of Revised Rule of Cameras in Court’ (1997) November–December Judicial Council of California Court NewsGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Human Rights Australian Capital Territory and Legal Culture: the Judiciary and the Legal Profession’ (1999) 26 Journal of Law and Society86 (Oxford)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Televising the Courts: Case against Reform’ (1992) Media Law and Practice174 (London)Google Scholar
‘In Camera with Court TV’ (1994) 69(47) New Yorker28
, ‘Reporting the Courts: the Media's Rights and Responsibilities’ (1999) 34 Irish Jurist1Google Scholar
,‘Activism and Restraint: Human Rights and the Interpretative Process’ (1999) 4 European Human Rights Law Review350 (London)Google Scholar
, ‘The Inherent Jurisdiction of the Court’ (1970) 23 Current Legal Problems23 (Oxford)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Judges Deny Court Camera Use’ (1990) The News Media and the Law40 (Washington)
‘Judges Ease Restrictions on Cameras in Courts’ (1992) 16(1) The News Media and the Law52 (Washington)
Judicial Council of California, ‘Media and Courts: Searching for Balance’ (1996) June–July Court News12
‘Justice Stewart Retires’ (1981) 67 American Bar Association Journal954
, ‘TV Cameras, Public Self-Consciousness, and Mock Juror Performance’ (1984) 20 Journal of Experimental Social Psychology336 (New York)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Supreme Court Beat: How Television Covers the US Supreme Court’ (1983) 67 Judicature7 (Chicago)Google Scholar
,‘The First Amendment and Technological Change: the New Media Have a Message’ (1989) 57 George Washington Law Review1459Google Scholar
, ‘Video-Conferencing in the County Court’ (1998) 72(12) Law Institute Journal67 (Melbourne)Google Scholar
, ‘Federal Court Online with “Ecourt” Initiatives’ (2001) 39(3) Law Society Journal34 (London)Google Scholar
, ‘Leaving the Trial to the Court: the PM's List of Cases’ (1990) 28(8) Law Society Journal76 (London)Google Scholar
Keyzer, Patrick, ‘What the Courts and the Media Can Do to Improve the Standard of Media Reporting of the Work of the Courts’ (1999) 11 University of Technology Sydney Law Review1
, ‘The Story Behind the Adoption of the Ban on Courtroom Cameras’ (1979) 63 Judicature14 (Chicago)Google Scholar
,‘Judiciary, Media and Government’ (1993) 3 Journal of Judicial Administration63 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
,‘Forum: Televising Court Proceedings’ (1995) 18 University of New South Wales Law Journal483Google Scholar
,‘Acting Judges: a Non-Theoretical Danger’ (1998) 8 Journal of Judicial Administration69 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
,‘The Future of Courts: Do They Have One?’ (1998) 9 Journal of Law and Information Science141 (Broadway, NSW)Google Scholar
, ‘No More Heroes: War Correspondents Retreat from the Front Line and Allow Truth to be Buried at Scripted Press Briefings’ (2000) 6 IPI Report8 (Manchester)Google Scholar
, ‘Videoconferencing in Civil Cases in Victoria’ (1999) 73(7) Law Institute Journal71 (Melbourne)Google Scholar
, and , ‘Pretrial Publicity, Judicial Remedies and Jury Bias’ (1990) 14 Law and Human Behavior409 (New York)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Court on Radio: a First for South Australia’ (1997) Law Society Journal of South Australia Bulletin10Google Scholar
,‘Ground Breaking TV Documentary’ (1997) Law Society Journal of South Australia Bulletin 15Google Scholar
, ‘How the Media Missed Rwandan Genocide’ (2000) First Quarter IPI Report11 (Manchester)Google Scholar
, ‘Courtroom Television Cameras and the Media’ (1995) 16 Media Law and Practice139 (London)Google Scholar
, ‘On Camera Proceedings: a Critical Evaluation of the Inter-Relationship between the Principle of Open Justice and the Televising of Court Proceedings in Australia’ (1999) 25 Monash University Law Review54Google Scholar
, ‘Cameras in the Courtroom? A Fair Trial is at Stake’ (1995) 31(3) Trial68 (Washington)Google Scholar
,‘TV or Not TV: That is the Question’ (1996) 86 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology928 (Chicago)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Lawyers Aren't Convinced that TV Belongs in Courtrooms’ (1979) 65 American Bar Association Journal1306
, ‘The Courtroom as a Stop on the Information Superhighway’ (1997) 71 Reform4 (Australian Law Reform Commission, Sydney)Google Scholar
and , ‘Lights, Camera, Action in the Courts’ (1999) 73(8) Law Institute Journal64 (Melbourne)Google Scholar
, ‘Reporting the Rodney King Trial: the Role of Legal Experts’ (1994) 27 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review649Google Scholar
‘Lights, Camera, Action at Parramatta’ (2004) 4 Courtside: Newsletter of the Family Court of Australia1
et al., ‘How Print and Broadcast Journalists Perceive Performance of Reporters in Courtroom’ (1988) 65 Journalism Quarterly621 (Minneapolis)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘An Assessment of the Use of Cameras in State and Federal Courts’ (1984) 18 Georgia Law Review389Google Scholar
, ‘Camera Access to Courtrooms: Canadian, US, and Australian Experiences’ (1993) 18(1) Canadian Journal of Communication, www.cjc-online.ca/viewarticle.php?id=138&layout=html at 25 April 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Effect on Juries Hearing about the Defendant's Previous Criminal Record: a Simulation Study’ (2000) Criminal Law Review734 (London)Google Scholar
Los Angeles Superior Court, (2001) Spring Gavel to Gavel 1
, ‘Big Trouble: Celebrity Journals and the Good Old Days that Never Were’ (1998) 12 Media Studies Journal46 (New York)Google Scholar
, ‘Contempt by Publication’ (2004–5) 85 Reform27 (Australian Law Reform Commission, Sydney)Google Scholar
and , ‘Review of the Extent of Courtroom Technology in Australia’ (2004) 12 William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal649 (Williamsburg, VA)Google Scholar
, ‘Television Coverage of Western Australian Court Proceedings?’ (1996) 23(1) Brief6 (Law Society of Western Australia)Google Scholar
,‘Judicial Evolution: Interview with Sir Anthony Mason by Innes, Prue and Burstin, Fay’ (1995) 69(8) Law Institute Journal745 (Melbourne)Google Scholar
, ‘Court on Camera: Electronic Broadcast Coverage of the Legal Proceedings’ (2000) Picturing Justice: The Online Journal of Law and Popular Culture (University of San Francisco School of Law), www.usfca.edu/pj/camera-mason.htm at 25 April 2007Google Scholar
,‘Justice Seen to be Done? Electronic Broadcasting of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’ (2001) 95 American Society of International Law Proceedings210Google Scholar
, ‘Camera Shy: the Supreme Court has Allowed TV into the Lower Courts Why do they Ban it for Themselves?’ (1989) Student Lawyer42 (Chicago)Google Scholar
, ‘The Ways Available to the Judicial Arm of Government to Preserve Judicial Independence’ (1992) 1 Journal of Judicial Administration236 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
, ‘Does Chapter III of the Constitution Protect Substantive as well as Procedural Rights?’ (2001) 3 Constitutional Law and Policy Review57 (St. Leonards, NSW)Google Scholar
, ‘Scotch Mist: the Lockerbie Trial and Article 10’ (2001) 46 Journal of the Law Society of Scotland21Google Scholar
, ‘Justice through the Eye of a Camera: Cameras in the Courtrooms in the United States, Canada, England and Scotland’ (1996) 14 Dickinson Journal of International Law673 (Carlisle, PA)Google Scholar
, ‘Broadcasters Improvise to Cover Young Bush Hearing’ (2001) 25(3) The News Media and the Law27 (Washington)Google Scholar
Morgan, D. G., ‘Section 31: the Broadcasting Ban’ (1990–92) 25–27 Irish Jurist 117
‘Problems Posed by Publicity to Crime and Criminal Proceedings’ (1961) 110 University of Pennsylvania Law Review11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Televising the Courts: an Appraisal of the Scots Experiment’ (1995) 159 Justice of the Peace and Local Government Law (Little London, Chichester)Google Scholar
, ‘Electronic Media Coverage of Courts and the Role of Counsel: a Survey of Counsel's Views and the Possible Impacts’ (2006) 11(1) MALR26Google Scholar
, ‘Fair Trial of Free Press: Legal Responses to Media Reports of Criminal Trials’ (1994) 53 Cambridge Law Journal492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Role of the Public Information Officer in New South Wales’ (1995) 5 Journal of Judicial Administration34 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
, ‘Does Research Support the Estes Ban on Cameras in the Courtroom?’ (1980) 63 Judicature467 (Chicago)Google Scholar
‘New Code of Judicial Conduct is Adopted by the American Bar Association’ (1972) 58 American Bar Association Journal1207
‘News Forces to Pack NJ Town for Trial’ (1934) Editor and Publisher 16 (New York)
,‘Judicial Independence and the Conduct of Media Relations by Courts’ (1993) 2 Journal of Judicial Administration207 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
,‘The Courts, the Media and the Community’ (1995) 5 Journal of Judicial Administration5 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
,‘The Paperless Court? Technology and the Courts in the Region’ (2002) 12(2) Journal of Judicial Administration63 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
and , ‘The Impact of Pretrial Publicity on Jurors: a Study to Compare the Relative Effects of Television and Print Media in a Child Sex Case’ (1994) 18 Law and Human Behavior507 (New York)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘Coming Ready or Not: Courts and Information Technology’ (1997) 71 Reform10 (Sydney)Google Scholar
‘Open Justice’ (1989) 142 New Law Journal957 (London)
, ‘Protection of Judicial Process as an Implied Constitutional Principle’ (1994) 16 Adelaide Law Review341Google Scholar
, ‘Turning the Camera on Court TV: Does Televising Trials Teach Us Anything about the Real Law?’ (1997) 58 Ohio State Law Journal655Google Scholar
, ‘BC Lawyer Champions Cameras in Court’ (2001) 4 University of British Columbia Journalism ReviewGoogle Scholar
, ‘Lights, Camera, Cross-Examination: Television Cameras in the Court’ (1990) NSW Bar Association5Google Scholar
‘Photographers Enjoy Improved Court Access’ (2001) 25(4) The News Media and the Law40 (Washington)
, ‘Pretrial Suppression Hearings: In Camera or on Camera?’ (1983) 29 Loyola Law Review515 (New Orleans)Google Scholar
‘Pilot Program Suggested for Sunshine Australian Capital Territory Changes’ (1995) 19(4) The News Media and the Law19 (Washington)
, ‘Federal Judges to Weight Cameras, Judicial Conference to Consider Newman Plan for Circuit Courts’ (1996) 215(43) New York Law Journal1Google Scholar
, ‘The OJ Simpson Trial and the American Legal System’ (1995) 145 New Law Journal990 (London)Google Scholar
, ‘TV in the Courtroom: Right of Access?’ (1981) 3(1) Communications and the Law11 (Westport, CT)Google Scholar
, ‘Television in the Courtroom: Von Bülow and the Jazz Singer’ (1982) 25 Saint Louis University Law Journal813Google Scholar
, ‘Cameras in Court: What Can Cameras in Parliament Teach Us?’ (1998) Contemporary Issues in Law82 (London)Google Scholar
,‘Televising Courtroom Proceedings in Canada: Relevant Considerations for the UK’ (2002) 7 Communications Law188 (Surrey)Google Scholar
‘Proceedings in Courts of Petty Sessions Televised’ (1981) 55 Australian Law Journal511
‘Proceedings of the House of Delegates: Mid-Year Meeting’ (1952) 38 American Bar Association Journal425
Public Issues Committee of the Auckland District Law Society, ‘Televising Trials’ (1995) New Zealand Law Journal101
, ‘Courts Should Take Strong Action to Stop Trials by Media’ (1991) 13 Australian Journalism Review45Google Scholar
, ‘The Impact of a Televised Trial on Individuals’ Information and Attitudes’ (1992) 75 Judicature204 (Chicago)Google Scholar
‘Reno, Judges Support Cameras in Courts; Some Politicians Want to Pull the Plug after Simpson Trial’ (1995) 19(4) The News Media and the Law43 (Washington)
‘Report of the Special Committee on Cooperation between Press, Radio and Bar as to Publicity Interfering with Fair Trial of Judicial and Quasi-Judicial Proceedings’ (1937) 62 American Bar Association Report851
,‘Panelists Differ over TV's Impact on Trials’ (1992) 78 OctAmerican Bar Association Journal44Google Scholar
,‘No More Cameras in Federal Courts: Judicial Conference Ends Experiment Despite Few Complaints from Judges’ (1994) 80 NovAmerican Bar Association Journal 28Google Scholar
,‘Courtroom Cameras Face New Scrutiny’ (1995) 81 NovAmerican Bar Association Journal48dGoogle Scholar
,‘Rally for Court Cameras Falls Short’ (1995) 81 MarAmerican Bar Association Journal30Google Scholar
,‘A Repeat Performance: Judicial Conference Allows Cameras Back in Appeals Courts’ (1996) 82 MayAmerican Bar Association Journal38Google Scholar
, ‘Television Coverage of Trials: Constitutional Protection against Absolute Denial of Access in the Absence of a Compelling Interest’ (1985) 30 Villanova Law Review1267Google Scholar
, ‘The Hauptmann Trial in the Light of English Criminal Procedure’ (1935) 21 American Bar Association Journal301Google Scholar
, ‘An Empirical and Normative Analysis of the Impact of Televised Courtroom Proceedings’ (1998) 51 Southern Methodist University Law Review621 (Dallas)Google Scholar
, ‘Media and Judges in Queensland Time for Change?’ (1997) 17(2) Proctor7 (Queensland)Google Scholar
, ‘The Media and Criminal Contempt: the English Experience’ (1989) New Zealand Law Journal282Google Scholar
, ‘Courting Technology: Planning is Needed to Make Electronic Wizardry Work in New Courtrooms’ (1997) 83 NovAmerican Bar Association Journal112Google Scholar
and , ‘Public Trust and Confidence in the Courts: What Public Opinion Surveys Mean to Judges’ (1999) Court Review 24 (New Orleans)Google Scholar
, ‘The Rising Problem of Abusive Attorneys and Trial Publicity’ (1996–7) 21 Journal of the Legal Profession267 (University, AL)Google Scholar
, ‘Casenote: In Re Post-Newsweek Stations and Chandler v Florida: Television on Trial’ (1981) 35 University of Miami Law Review345Google Scholar
, ‘From Access to Justice to Managing Justice: the Transformation of the Judicial Role’ (2002) 12 Journal of Judicial Administration5 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
, ‘What Do Jury Experiments Tell Us about How Juries (Should) Make Decisions?’ (1997) 6(1) Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal1Google Scholar
, ‘Scientific and Procedural Aspects of the Hauptmann Trial’ (1935) 21 American Bar Association Journal177Google Scholar
, ‘Electronic Media Access to Federal Courtrooms: a Judicial Response’ (1990) 23 University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform769Google Scholar
, ‘Send Lawyers, Guns and Microphones’ (1989) 14 Legal Service Bulletin261 (Fitzroy, Vic.)Google Scholar
, and , ‘Public Perception of the Supreme Court in the 1990s’ (1998) 82 Judicature66 (Chicago)Google Scholar
, ‘Nebraska Press Association: an Expansion of Freedom and Contradiction Theory’ (1977) 29 Stanford Law Review431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘CJC Reiterated its Opposition in spite of its Subcommittee Recommendations’ (2001) 21 Lawyers Weekly (Ontario)Google Scholar
,‘Judicial Council Divided over TV Cameras in Court “It's like Working in a Juristic Jurassic Park” Says Critic’ (2001) 21 Lawyers Weekly (Ontario)Google Scholar
,‘Ontario's Chief Justice Rejects Televising Trial Proceedings’ (2003) 22 Lawyers Weekly (Ontario)Google Scholar
, ‘Whether Broadcasting of Court Proceedings Unlawful’ (2001) Entertainment Law Review N (London)Google Scholar
‘Scots Look at Televised Courts’ (1992) 142 New Law Journal79 (London)
‘Screenwriter Ordered to Testify in OJ Simpson Double-Murder Trial’ (1995) 19(4) The News Media and the Law22 (Washington)
, ‘Supporters of Cameras in Court See Benefits of Televising Trials’ (1995) 31(3) Trial70 (Washington)Google Scholar
, ‘The Trial as One of the Performing Arts’ (1966) 52 American Bar Association Journal1145Google Scholar
‘Simpson's Trial and the Rush to Reform’ (1995) 79 Judicature56 (Chicago)
and , ‘Methodological Issues in the Evaluation of “Experiments” with Cameras in the Courts’ (1982) 30 Communication Quarterly376 (University Park, PA)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Media Coverage of Supreme Court Decision Making: Problems and Prospects’ (1991) 75 Judicature128 (Chicago)Google Scholar
Special Committee on Cooperation between the Press, Radio and Bar, ‘Report’ (1936) 62 American Bar Association Report851
, ‘Seen to be Done: the Principle of Open Justice, Part I’ (2000) 74 Australian Law Journal290Google Scholar
‘Seen to be Done: the Principle of Open Justice, Part II’ (2000) 74 Australian Law Journal378Google Scholar
, ‘Cyber Courts: Using the Internet to Assist Court Processes’ (1997) 8 Journal of Law and Information Science240 (Broadway, NSW)Google Scholar
, ‘Showing to Jury of Videotape of Examination de Bene Esse’ (1988) 62 Australian Law Journal727Google Scholar
‘The First Video Tele-Hearing Conducted by the High Court of Australia’ (1988) 62 Australian Law Journal407Google Scholar
‘State Keeps Abuse Complaint, Investigation Reports Secret’ (1996) 20(1) The News Media and the Law27 (Washington)
et al., ‘The Effects of Pre-Trial Publicity on Juror Verdicts: a Meta-Analytic Review’ (1999) 23 Law and Human Behavior219 (New York)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Understanding Speech Rights: Defensive and Empowering Approaches to the First Amendment’ (2004) 26(1) Media, Culture and Society103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Justice on the Box? The Televising of Trials Panders to the Current Trend for True-Life Crimes rather than Showing the Reality’ (1994) 91(42) Law Society's Gazette2 (London)Google Scholar
, ‘Why Shouldn't Australian Court Proceedings be Televised?’ (1994) 17 University of New South Wales Law Journal345Google Scholar
‘Cameras in Courts: a Reflection on Contemporary Issues’ (2003) 3 Peppercorn15 (Canberra)Google Scholar
‘The Broadcast of Court Proceedings in the Internet Age: the Role of Courts’ (2004) 85 Reform33 (Sydney)Google Scholar
‘Technology and Public Access to Audio-Visual Coverage and Recordings of Court Proceedings: Implications for Common Law Jurisdictions’ (2004) 12 William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal791 (Williamsburg, VA)Google Scholar
,‘A Comparative Analysis of First Amendment Rights and the Televising of Court Proceedings’ (2004) 40 Idaho Law Review315Google Scholar
‘Court TV: Coming to an Internet Browser Near You’ (2006) 15 Journal of Judicial Administration218 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
and , ‘Court in the Web’ (2000) 25(2) Alternative Law Journal71 (Clayton, Vic.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘TV or Not TV: Televised and Photographic Coverage of Trials’ (1978) 29 Mercer Law Review1119 (Macon, GA)Google Scholar
, ‘Why it's Not Free Speech Versus Fair Trial’ (1998) 13 University of Chicago Legal Forum109Google Scholar
and , ‘Cameras in State Courts: a Historical Perspective’ (1994) 78 Judicature128 (Chicago)Google Scholar
, ‘Put Cameras in Top Court, but Don't Expect Viewers’ (1997) 147 New Jersey Law Journal405Google Scholar
, ‘Colliding with Contempt: Journalists Facing Order of Prior Restraint Question whether to Comply or Risk Court Action’ (2002) 26(3) The News Media and the Law4 (Washington)Google Scholar
, ‘The Courts, the Media and the Community : a Victorian Perspective’ (1995) 5 Journal of Judicial Administration22 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
‘Access to the Courts and its Implications’ (1999) 1 University of Technology Sydney Law Review112Google Scholar
‘Tele-Justice’ (1989) 139 New Law Journal705 (London)
‘Televised Courts’ (1988) 85(45) Law Society5 (London)
‘Television in Scotland’ (1992) 142 New Law Journal1149 (London)
‘Tennessee Begins Camera Experiment, while Others Consider Restrictions’ (1996) 20(1) The News Media and the Law38 (Washington)
, ‘Cameras before the Courts’ (2001) 3(4) University of British Columbia Journalism Review, www.journalism.ubc.ca/thunderbird/archives/2001.04/cameras.html at 25 April 2007Google Scholar
and , ‘Video in the Misdemeanor Court: the South Florida Experience’ (1985) 69 Judicature13 (Chicago)Google Scholar
, ‘Courts Reexamine Access to Jury Information: Missouri, Ohio High Courts Affirm Presumptive Right of Access’ (2003) 27(1) The News Media and the Law19 (Washington)Google Scholar
,‘District Attorney Petitions Appeals Court to Vacate Judge's Order Permitting “Frontline” to Tape Jury’ (2003) 27(1) The News Media and the Law22 (Washington)Google Scholar
‘Philadelphia Inquirer asks US Supreme Court to Review Ban that Kept Media from Interviewing Jurors’ (2003) 27(1) The News Media and the Law21 (Washington)Google Scholar
, ‘“Guide to Judicial Conduct”: a New Handbook for Judges’ (2003) 77 Australian Law Journal240Google Scholar
, ‘Constitutionalising the Role of the Judge: Scotland and the New Order’ (2001) 5 Edinburgh Law Review49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Interview with the Media: Practitioners’ Duty to the Court’ (1998) LawTalk31 (Wellington)Google Scholar
and , ‘The Case against Television in the Courtroom’ (1980) 16 Willamette Law Review777Google Scholar
‘Trial Secrecy and the First Amendment Right of Public Access to Judicial Proceedings’ (1978) 91 Harvard Law Review1899CrossRef
‘Truth and Rumour’ (1995) 145 New Law Journal1565 (London)
‘Turning the Camera on Court TV: Does Televising Trials Teach Us Anything about the Real Law’ (1997) 58 Ohio State Law Journal655
, ‘Cameras Cross Atlantic: the USA's Trial Broadcasters are Making a Pitch to Televise UK Hearings’ (1995) 92(19) Law Society's Gazette14 (London)Google Scholar
‘Video Cameras Allowed in City Board Meetings’ (1996) 20(1) The News Media and the Law28 (Washington)
, ‘Fundamental Rights, Fair Trials and the New Audio Visual Sector’ (1996) 59 Modern Law Review517 (London)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Challenge of Information Technology in Australian Courts’ (1999) 9 Journal of Judicial Administration8 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
‘Courts on-Line: Public Access to the Electronic Court Record’ (2000) 10 Journal of Judicial Administration94 (North Ryde, NSW)Google Scholar
, ‘Digital Courtrooms in Perth: the Courtroom Strikes Back’ (1999) 26(9) Brief5 (Law Society of Western Australia)Google Scholar
, ‘Fights, Camera, Action: as the Government Considers Letting Cameras into Court to Film Appeals, a Look at whether Television Impedes Justice’ (2001) 98(40) Law Society Gazette22 (London)Google Scholar
, ‘Digital Courtrooms in Perth: the Courtroom Strikes back’ (1999) 26 Brief5 (Law Society of Western Australia)Google Scholar
and , ‘Banning Broadcasting: a Transatlantic Perspective’ (1992) Media Law and Practice179 (London)Google Scholar
, and , ‘Preparing for the High Profile Case: an Omnibus Treatment for Judges and Lawyers’ (1999) 51 Florida Law Review425Google Scholar
‘What We See’ (1996) National Law Journal (New York)
, ‘Florida's Experience with Cameras in the Courtroom’ (1978) 64 American Bar Association Journal1860Google Scholar
, ‘Ministry of Justice Video Link Service’ (2001) 28(2) Brief33 (Law Society of Western Australia)Google Scholar
, ‘The Courts and the Media: What Reforms are Needed and Why’ (1999) 7 University of Technology Sydney Law Review1Google Scholar
and , ‘Methodological Considerations in Pretrial Publicity: Is the Medium the Message’ (1988) 22 Law and Human Behavior585 (New York)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Justice in Living Color: the Case for Courtroom Television’ (1974) 60 American Bar Association Journal294Google Scholar
, ‘Teleconferencing of Courtroom Evidence’ (1991) 65(9) Law Institute Journal862 (Melbourne)Google Scholar
, ‘The Role of the Electronic Media in the Criminal Justice System’ (1978) 47 University of Cincinnati Law Review417Google Scholar
, ‘Overcoming Future Shock: Estes Revisited, or a Modest Proposal for the Constitutional Protection of the News-Gathering Process’ (1980) 4 Duke Law Journal641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘A hard case’, Daily Telegraph (Sydney), 1 August 2003, p. 29
Abrahamson, Alan, ‘Gap divides worlds of Menendezes, their jurors’, Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles), 27 December 1993
Abrams, F., ‘The public needs TV to oversee the courts’, New York Times (New York), 26 September 1994
Ackland, Richard, ‘TV eye in the storm of justice’, Sydney Morning Herald (Sydney), 12 June 1998
Ackland, Richard,‘New rape trial is on a slim premise’, Sydney Morning Herald (Sydney), 5 March 2004
Adams, David, ‘Child murder judges question TV sentence’, The Age (Melbourne), 23 December 1995, p. 1
Adams, Geoff, ‘Yorta claim starts’, Shepparton News (Shepparton, Vic.), 29 October 1996, p. 1
Adams, Geoff,‘Yorta land “taken” ’, Shepparton News (Shepparton, Vic.), 30 October 1996, p. 1
Adams, Phillip, ‘The trials of justice’, Weekend Australian (Melbourne), 25–26 September 1993, p. 2
Ainsworth, Bill, ‘Legislative ban on cameras in California courts dies in Committee’, Recorder (Sacramento), 11 April 1996
Ainsworth, Bill,‘California judges to have last word on cameras’, Recorder (Sacramento), 20 May 1996, p. 1
Aisbett, Norman, ‘Days of reckoning’, West Australian (Perth), 20 November 1999, p. 3
Aisbett, Norman,‘Atrocities of Srebrenica’, West Australian (Perth), 27 November 1999, p. 5
Albrechtsen, Janet, ‘Dreamer courts legal contention’, The Australian (Sydney), 20 October 2004, p. 15
‘Aramoana victim's family say no to televised trial’, Malborough Express (New Zealand), 27 April 1995
Atkinson, Peter, ‘Camera ban in toddler murder trial’, Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 2 July 1995, p. 42
‘Australian judge allows TV to show sentencing of murderer’, The Press (Christchurch), 15 May 1995
‘Back-off by TV on court filming’, New Zealand Herald, 29 May 1995
Bailey, Judy, ‘Media advocates blast Georgia's new Camera Bill’, Fulton County Daily Report (Atlanta), 28 February 1996, p. 1
‘Bain case TV bid denied’, Greymouth Evening Star (New Zealand), 28 April 1995
‘Bain murder trial will not be televised’, Nelson Evening Mail (New Zealand), 28 April 1995
‘Bain trial to ban TV cover’, New Zealand Herald, 28 April 1995
‘Bain trial won't be televised’, Evening Standard (Pamerston North), 28 April 1995
Bain, George, ‘The criminal trial as sport spectacle’, Maclean's (Toronto), 20 February 1995, p. 55
Bain, Helen, ‘Publicity fear for Barlow's second trial’, Dominion (Wellington), 26 June 1995
Baldwin, Tom, ‘This is not a trial, says Law Lord’, The Times (London), 2 August 2003, p. 4
Balogh, Stefanie and Meade, Kevin, ‘Conservationists declare war’, Weekend Australian (Brisbane), 15–16 February 1997, p. 4
‘Bank killer told his mother “I'm Sorry” ’, New Zealand Herald (Auckland), 17 October 2003, p. A13
‘Banning the cameras’, Maclean's (Toronto), 20 March 1995, p. 19
Barker, Garry, ‘Courts may crack down on mobiles’, The Age (Melbourne), 17 June 2003
‘Barlow judge bans photos’, Hawkes Bay Herald Tribune (Hastings), 19 May 1995
Barton, Fiona, ‘Murder trials to be broadcast on British TV within two years’, Mail on Sunday (London), 10 September 1995, p. 17
Baum, Geraldine, ‘Courtroom of the frightening and surreal’, Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles), 10 February 1995
‘British Broadcasting Corporation2 to air OJ Simpson trial special’, Broadcast (London), 6 October 1995
Beach, Bennett H., ‘Blind justice gets a seeing eye’, Time, 9 February 1981, p. 35
Bennett, Alison, ‘Behind the Bar’, West Australian (Perth), 2003, p. 5
Bennett, Vanora, ‘War crimes trial and error’, Weekend Australian (Perth), 17 April 2004
Beynen, Martin van, ‘TV firms subdued over filming trials’, The Press (Christchurch), 22 February 1995, p. 5
‘Bid to televise Bain case turned down’, Westport News, 28 April 1995
‘Bid to televise Bain trial fails’, Timaru Herald (New Zealand), 28 April 1995
Bigart, Homer, ‘Estes goes on trial in Texas with TV in courtroom’, New York Times (New York), 25 September 1962
Biskupic, Joan, ‘Vote on cameras reveals judges’ deep concern; mistrust of media is called a factor in decision against televising Federal Court hearings’, Washington Post (Washington DC), 23 September 1994, p. A3
Black, Joanne, ‘Axe-murder first for TV coverage’, Daily News (New Plymouth), 18 May 1995
Black, Hon. Michael E. J., ‘Court TV verdict cannot be rushed’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 6 November 1995
Bonnington, Alistair, ‘Lockerbie appeals will create TV history’, The Times (London), 22 January 2002
Borick, K. V., ‘Trial may provoke real debate how a jury works’, Weekend Australian (Melbourne), 7–8 October 1995
Boswell, D. J., ‘Courts and television’, Sunday Star Times (Wellington), 23 April 1995
Boyes, Roger, ‘Chilling Smile of a German Cannibal’, The Australian (Perth), 5 December 2003, 13
Boyes, Roger,‘A mercy killing, not murder, accused cannibal claims’, The Australian (Perth), 10 December 2003, p. 8
Boyes, Roger,‘From cyber fantasy to cannibal's dinner plate’, The Australian (Perth), 23 December 2003, p. 7
Brady, David E., ‘Ito defends televising of Simpson trial’, Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles), 24 October 1995, p. B3
Brady, Nicole and Gibson, Rachel, ‘A mixed reaction to a slice of history’, The Age (Melbourne), 19 May 1995, p. 8
Bravin, Jess, ‘High Court's deep divisions have almost always healed – so far’, Wall Street Journal (Washington), 14 December 2000, p. A19
Bremner, Charles, ‘US tunes in to soap opera trial of a dynasty’, The Australian (Sydney), 6 November 1991
Brewster, Deborah, ‘US will be role model for Australian digital television’, Weekend Australian (Brisbane), 7–8 February 1998, p. 7
Brill, Steven, ‘The eye that educates’, New York Times (New York), 15 July 1994, p. 2
Brill, Steven,‘Cameras in the courts and original intent’, Legal Times (Detroit), 22 January 1996, p. 24
Brill, Steven,‘Death row TV’, Brill's Content (New York), April 2001, p. 24
Brockie, Jenny, ‘TV cameras can open courts to greater scrutiny’, The Australian (Melbourne), 22 May 1995
Brook, Kip, ‘Plea to keep cameras out of Bain trial’, Greymouth Evening Star (New Zealand), 27 April 1995
Brook, Stephen, ‘Photo finish for press freedom in Parliament’, The Australian (Melbourne), 14–20 February 2002, p. 3
Broughton, Philip Delves, ‘A last look, then terrorist lies down’, Daily Telegraph (London), 12 June 2001, p. 4
Brown, Bruce D., ‘D.C. judges aren't poised to become media stars’, Legal Times (Detroit), 18 March 1996, p. 2
Bryant, Hon. Diana, ‘From the Chief Justice’ (2004) 4(6) Courtside: Newsletter of the Family Court of Australia 2
Bunyan, Nigel, ‘215 murders: Shipman's terrible toll’, Weekly Telegraph (London), 24–30 July 2002, p. 1
Burke, Shane, ‘Police fail to show bloody ski mask’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 24 June 1994
Burkeman, Oliver, ‘All the decisions have to be taken by me. I alone will decide what matters’, Guardian (London), 2 August 2003, p. 1
Burman, Neil, ‘“Lights, Gavel, Action” in Courtroom’, West Australian (Perth), 15 May 1999, p. 5
Burnett, Dan, ‘The battle for cameras in court’, Broadcast Dialogue (Canada), March 2002, p. 37
Burton, T., ‘Gallery's old masters given new orders’, The Australian (Perth), 13–19 June 2002, p. 4
Butcher, Steve, ‘Court TV man appears again’, The Age (Melbourne), 28 April 1996, p. 4
Butler, Bruce, ‘Tribal punishment call’, Sunday Times (Perth), 21 March 1999
Butler, Julie, ‘Media “Shackled” in court matters’, West Australian (Perth), 12 June 2002, p. 44
Butterfield, Alan and Fitz, Reginald, ‘Battered Nicole: her sister took photos’, National Enquirer (US), 3 January 1995, p. 46
‘Camera records guilty plea’, The Press (Christchurch), 15 March 1995
‘Camera-equipped cell phones courting disaster’, Mainichi Daily News (Tokyo), 3 November 2002
‘Cameras in court’, Evening Standard (Palmerston North), 14 March 1995
‘Cameras in court a worry’, New Zealand Herald, 17 February 1995
‘Cameras in court; public's right to know, hear, see is foremost’, Houston Chronicle (Houston), 24 September 1994, p. 26
‘Cameras in courtrooms survive’, New Zealand Herald, 28 March 1995
‘Cameras in Courts’, Evening Post (Wellington), 26 May 1995
Campbell, Gerard, ‘Lawyers oppose televised court’, The Press (Christchurch), 21 February 1995
Campbell, Roderick, ‘Federal Court may be first to be televised’, Canberra Times (Canberra), 26 May 1994
Campbell, Roderick,‘Institute of Judicial Administration Conference’, Canberra Times (Canberra), 21 August 1995, p. 2
‘Canada tries to expel accused Nazi’, The Australian (Melbourne), 24 January 1997, p. 5
‘Canty lawyers opposed to televised trials’, The Press (Christchurch), 15 March 1995
Carruthers, Fiona, ‘TV “Losing its reputation for reliable” News’, The Australian (Melbourne), 13 July 1994, p. 5
Cash, William, ‘British nanny reprieved via the American way of justice’, The Australian (Melbourne), 12 November 1997
Catliff, Nick, ‘His Lordship regrets that this particular case …’ The Times (London), 15 November 1994, p. 29
Catliff, Nick,‘Lockerbie: a trial for television’, Guardian (London), 22 February 1999
Catliff, Nick,‘Trust the people’, Guardian (London), 7 February 2000, p. 4
‘Chief Justice turned off by courts on TV’, West Australian (Perth), 25 March 2007
Chrisafis, Angelique, Wells, Matt and Travis, Alan, ‘Leslie free as media row escalates’, Guardian (London), 2003, p. 1
Chulov, Martin, ‘Gang rape pair avoid new trial’, The Australian (Perth), 4 February 2005, p. 1
‘Clark takes stand in Milosevic trial’, West Australian (Perth), 16 December 2003, p. 21
Clarke, Magnus, ‘Justice runs out of juice’, Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 8 October 1995, p. 41
Clifton, Jane, ‘Police oppose cameras in courts’, Sunday Star Times (Wellington), 19 February 1995, p. A3
Clune, Bronwen, ‘Don't vilify us: lawyer’, West Australian (Perth), 25 September 1998
Cocker, Alan, ‘Courtrooms not the place for television’, New Zealand Herald (Wellington), 11 May 1995
Coffey, Michelle, ‘Telecast whets an appetite’, The Australian (Melbourne), 19 May 1995, p. 4
Coffey, Michelle and Hawes, Rachel, ‘Murder sentence broadcast divides the nation’, The Australian (Melbourne), 19 May 1995, p. 1
Coles, Joanna, ‘Judging by the ratings, she's courting stardom’, The Australian (Perth), 30 July 1999
Conroy, Paul, ‘Justice being seen to be done’, The Age (Melbourne), 7 October 1995, p. A13
Conroy, Paul,‘Courts to cast new eye on crime’, The Age (Melbourne), 14 October 1995, p. A10
Conroy, Paul,‘Teague takes TV lead but reception still hazy’, The Age (Melbourne), 23 December 1995, p. 2
Conroy, Paul,‘Trial may use video graphics as jury aid’, The Age, 22 February 1993, p. 8
Conway, Doug, ‘In the beginning …’, Gold Coast Bulletin, 8 April 1997, p. 9
Cooper, Dani, ‘High court net access a boom for women’, The Australian (Perth), 2 December 2003, p. 29
Corelli, Rae, ‘North versus south’, Maclean's (Toronto), 29 May 1995, p. 18
Corrs Chambers Westgarth Solicitors, ‘Medialine’, Medialine, June 1995
Corrs Chambers Westgarth Solicitors,‘Medialine’, Medialine, December 1995
Costello, Michael, ‘Negative images of war overshadow the good things’, The Australian (Melbourne), 28 May 2004, p. 13
Costigan, Peter, ‘Publish and (occasionally), be damned’, Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 27 November 1994, p. 46
‘Could it happen here?’ Maclean's (Toronto), 18 July 1994, p. 2
Coulson, Russel, ‘Court venue custom-built’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 19 August 1996, p. 16
‘Court case televised’, Wairato Times (Hamilton), 14 March 1995
‘Court in Goulburn session’, Shepparton News (Shepparton, Vic.), 28 October 1996, p. 1
‘Court “no place” for TV cameras’, The Press (Christchurch), 7 October 1995
‘Court restrictions limit coverage: TV stations’, Dominion (Wellington), 29 May 1995
‘Courtroom filming a first’, Daily News (Taranaki, NZ), 15 March 1995
‘Courtroom TV cameras given test run’, Timaru Herald (New Zealand), 15 March 1995
‘Courts camera shy’, New Zealand Herald (Napier), 3 June 1995
‘Courts twice turn camera shy’, New Zealand Herald, 31 May 1995
Critchley, Cheryl, ‘Lavarch hint on TV trials’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 22 May 1995, p. 10
Crompton, Helen, ‘Taking on Judge Judy’, Sunday Times (Perth), 5–11 December 1999, p. 50
Davis, Patricia and Seaberry, Jane, ‘Bobbitt jury re-enacted pre-crime events’, Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles), 23 January 1994, p. A33
Davis, Robert, ‘The animated court’, Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 21 August 1994, p. 97
Day, Mark, ‘Courting the public’, The Australian (Melbourne), 9–15 December 1999, p. 13
Deutsch, Anthony, ‘Dutch court convict seven in suffocation deaths’, Moscow-Pullman Daily News (Moscow, Idaho), 11 May 2001, p. 5A
Devine, Frank, ‘Who dares loses in addled court rules’, The Australian (Melbourne), 16 September 1994, p. 15
Devine, Frank,‘In defence of OJ educational television’, The Australian (Melbourne), 9 October 1995, p. 11
‘Double Exposure’, Who (Melbourne), 30 October 1995, p. 38
‘Dr Death found hanged in cell’, West Australian (Perth), 14 January 2004, p. 15
Eccleston, Roy, ‘Here comes the judge’, The Australian Magazine (Melbourne), 22–23 June 1996, p. 20
Editorial, ‘Cameras in the court’, Washington Post (Washington DC), 11 July 2004
Editorial, ‘Judges will be under microscope’, New Zealand Herald, 15 October 2003, p. A18
Editorial, ‘Kicking cameras out of courtrooms’, Chicago Tribune (Chicago), 23 September 1994
Estrich, Susan, ‘Vigilante justice’, Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles), 16 January 1994, p. M1
‘Facts and opinions about cameras in courtrooms’, Court-TV (New York), January 1997, 18
‘Fair and exact: Lord Hutton's Inquiry has started well’, Guardian (London), 2 August 2003, p. 23
‘Fair trial “may be difficult” ’, Greymouth Evening Star (New Zealand), 26 June 1995
‘Faux Jacko's days in court’, Weekend Australian (Perth) 12–13 March 2005, p. 23
‘Federal Court goes online’, West Australian (Perth), 2 August 1999, p. 34
Field, Gillian, ‘Chief Justice briefly disrobes’, Canberra Times (Canberra), 21 May 1994
Fife-Yeomans, Janet, ‘Who denies contempt charges’, The Australian (Melbourne), 21 June 1994
Fife-Yeomans, Janet,‘Kerr backs TV in courts’, The Australian (Melbourne), 21 August 1995
Fife-Yeomans, Janet,‘Camera on crime’, Weekend Australian (Perth), 26–27 August 1995, p. 22
Fife-Yeomans, Janet,‘Judges learn to put on a public face’, Weekend Australian (Brisbane), 19–20 April 1997, p. 7
Fife-Yeomans, Janet,‘Courts ask public to be the judges’, The Australian (Brisbane), 21 August 1997
Fife-Yeomans, Janet,‘Judges sign off to let computers sort out marital disputes’, The Australian (Brisbane), 23 March 1998
Fife-Yeomans, Janet,‘Judges defend maligned courts’, The Australian (Perth), 7 September 1998, p. 2
Fife-Yeomans, Janet,‘A case of appearance, Your Honour’, The Australian (Perth), 1 April 1999, p. 3
Fife-Yeomans, Janet,‘Courting disaster’, The Australian (Perth), 21 February 2002, Media 24
Fife-Yeomans, Janet,‘Sets the legal drama bar too low’, The Australian (Melbourne), 22–28 May 2003, p. 24
Fife-Yeomans, Janet, Meade, Kevin and Blake, Emma, ‘Lavarch derides court TV’, The Australian (Melbourne), 15 October 1995
‘Filming refused’, Dominion (Wellington), 28 April 1995
‘First televised court hearing’, Dominion (Wellington), 15 March 1995
Fisher, David, ‘Judge followed and filmed by irked claimant’, Sunday Star Times (Wellington), 5 October 2003
Flahvin, Anne, ‘Justice through the eye of the camera’, Sydney Morning Herald (Melbourne), 26 September 1994
Fleeman, Michael, ‘OJ judge allows cameras to cover trial’, The Australian (Melbourne), 9 November 1994, p. 11
Flint, David, ‘The myth of trial by media’, The Australian (Melbourne), 14 May 1996, p. 17
‘Former judge backs Borbidge’, Courier Mail (Brisbane), 10 August 1998
Fotheringham, Allan, ‘The media and the message’, Maclean's (Toronto), 13 February 1995, p. 88
Frean, Alexandra, ‘British Broadcasting Corporation presses Mackay to allow cameras in court’, The Times (London), 24 August 1994, p. 4
‘From dossier to death: the key moments, the key people’, Guardian (London), 2 August 2003, p. 4
Gadens Lawyers, ‘Work Relations E-update: Royal Commission into Building and Construction’, September 2001, www.gadens.com.au/publications.asp?CategoryID=33&navid=4&cid=24 at 25 April 2007 www.gadens.com.au/docushare/dscgi/admin.py/Get/File-919/eSep01_royal_commission_building_industry.pdf
Gale CJ, ‘The problems of television in the courtrooms’ (1974) 8 LSUC Gazette (Ontario) 4
Gallardo, Eduardo, ‘Court drops Pinochet's worst charges’, USA Today (Seattle), 9 March 2001, p. 6A
Gamlin, Jeff, ‘Parliament versus the judiciary’, National Business Review (Wellington), 10 October 2003, p. 28
Gardner, Simon, ‘Nanny appeal to Blair’, Sunday Times (Melbourne), 3 October 1999, p. 33
Gaunder, Yashwant, ‘World's first Internet coup’, The Australian (Perth), 25–31 May 2000, p. 13
Gibb, Frances, ‘Irvine ready to allow TV cameras in Appeal Court’, The Times (London), 10 March 2003, p. 4
Gibb, Frances,‘Lord Chief Justice warns Ministers he is not crying wolf ’, The Times (London), 2 August 2003, p. 6
Gibb, Frances,‘Televising of courts: don't hold your breath’, The Times (London), 18 January 2005, Law 5
Gibson, Roy, ‘Doing justice to WA’, West Australian (Perth), 3 January 2004, p. 7
Gibson, Roy, Butler, Julie and Robb, Trevor, ‘Free at last’, West Australian (Perth), 26 February 2002, p. 1
Gordon, Jim, ‘No camera fans here’, News Photographer (Durham, NC), May 1996, 4
Graham, Scott, ‘California High Court to weigh in on public access to civil trials’, Recorder (US), 19 December 1996, p. 1
Greenhouse, Linda, ‘Distaining a sound bite, Federal judges banish TV’, New York Times (New York), 25 September 1994, p. 4
Gregory, Peter, ‘Court allows Yorta Yorta to record land claim for posterity’, The Age (Melbourne), 28 October 1996, p. A4
Gregory, Peter,‘Yorta Yorta People start battle for land they love’, The Age (Melbourne), 29 October 1996, p. A4
Gregory, Peter,‘Yorta Elder sees no need for court’, The Age (Melbourne), 30 October 1996
Gregory, Peter and Gibson, Rachel, ‘Killer gets life as “TV judge” makes history’, The Age (Melbourne), 19 May 1995, p. 1
Groner, Jonathan, ‘Who rules? Which rules? Cameras-in-court decision tests power of Judicial Conference’, Legal Times (Detroit), 11 March 1996, p. 2
Grove, Jennifer, ‘MP's study TV house rules’, West Australian (Perth), 18 September 1999, p. 49
Gunn, Michelle, ‘Hinch defends naming victim on TV’, The Australian (Melbourne), 4 March 1994
Hainsworth, Jeremy, ‘Internet publication ban on BC trial challenged’, Seattle Times (Seattle), 21 March 2003
Hall, Jane, ‘And the verdict is …’, Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles), 27 December 1993, p. F1
Hansen, Peter, ‘Seeing justice is a trial’, Sunday Mail (London), 23 November 1997, p. 121
Harder, Christopher, ‘Tapes in court’, Sunday Star Times (Auckland), 19 October 2003, p. C9
Haslem, Benjamin, ‘Ruddock to face Federal Court revolt’, The Australian (Perth), 3 June 2002, p. 1
Hattam, Grant, ‘The case for change’, Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 2 July 1995, p. 108
Hattam, Grant,‘Truth collides with justice’, Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 8 October 1995
Hawes, Rachel, ‘TV cameras to film murder sentencing’, The Australian (Melbourne), 13 May 1995, p. 1
Hawes, Rachel,‘OJ trial sparks calls for greater access to juries’, Weekend Australian (Melbourne), 7–8 October 1995
Hawes, Rachel,‘Chief Magistrate a safe choice’, The Australian (Melbourne), 8 May 1996, p. 4
Hay, David, ‘Media awards Hollywood madam poor second to OJ’, The Age (Melbourne), 20 November 1994
Hayslett, Jerrianne, ‘What a difference a lens makes’, Court Manager (Williamsburg, VA), 1997, p. 21
Henderson, Craig and Rayner, Stan, ‘A woman spurned’, Who (Melbourne), 30 October 1995
Henderson, Gerard, ‘Judges who court the spotlight’, Sydney Morning Herald (Sydney), 9 April 1996, p. 11
Henderson, Ian, ‘Chief Justice says only sick society would televise court’, The Australian (Sydney), 25 June 2001, p. 4
Henningham, John, ‘At odds with the court of public opinion’, The Australian (Melbourne), 20–26 November 2003, p. 7
Henry, Scott, ‘New Chief Magistrate advocates cases on TV’, The Australian (Melbourne), 25 November 1993, p. 5
Hewitt, Sue, ‘I know fate of Azaria’, Sunday Times (Perth), 4 July 2004, p. 1
Hickman, Belinda, ‘Judge allows cameras for verdict in 40-year manslaughter saga’, The Australian (Melbourne), 25 February 2002, p. 4
‘Hicks facing “Stalinist-style show trial” ’, The Australian (Melbourne), 14 July 2003, p. 5
‘High Court wants PR’, Daily Telegraph (Sydney), 29 December 1998, p. 20
Ho, Christina, ‘NSW courts idea of televised trials’, Sydney Morning Herald (Sydney), 3 September 1999, p. 4
Hogan, Dan and Mason, Paul, ‘Let the people see the Lockerbie trial’, The Times (London), 9 February 1999, p. 21
Hooks, Barbara, ‘Televised trials: are they inevitable here?’ The Age (Melbourne), 14 December 1995, p. 10
Hopkins, Jim, ‘Trial of the alien Undie Muncher supremely conducted’, New Zealand Herald (Auckland), 17 October 2003, p. A19
Hopkins, Nic, ‘Rush to use Web slows to a crawl’, The Australian (Perth), 1 May 2000, p. 36
‘Hostage tells of gunman's “one more victim” threat’, New Zealand Herald (Auckland), 17 October 2003
Hudson, Mike, ‘Nine TV guilty of naming victim’, The Australian (Sydney), 9 May 1990
Hughes, Judy, ‘North ruling flawed, Patrick tells Federal Court’, The Australian (Brisbane), 23 April 1998, p. 4
‘Hutton's hunt for truth’, Daily Telegraph (London), 2 August 2003, p. 21
‘Identification of Hauptmann follows police testing’, New York Times (New York), 9 January 1935, p. 12
‘In Australia's best interest’, Daily Telegraph (London), 18 September 2001, p. 20
‘Injudiciously camera shy; barring cameras in US courts is slap at public’, Buffalo News (Buffalo), 25 September 1994, p. 2
Innes, Prue, ‘Camera shy: why our judges won't show their faces on TV’, The Australian (Perth), 1 April 1999, p. 2
Irving, Mark, ‘Hotelier, TV man in court carpark scuffle’, The Australian (Brisbane), 7 August 1996
Jackson, Sally, ‘Pushing their opinions’, The Australian (Perth), 27 February 2003, p. 4
Jackson, Sally,‘Media companies claim law should be out of court’, The Australian (Perth), 17–23 July 2003, p. 3
‘Jail for 23 years for war crimes’, West Australian (Perth), 19 December 2003, p. 34
Jameson, Julietta, ‘TV banned from Simpson civil trial’, Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 25 August 1996
Jefferies, Pamela, ‘Parties request tribunal confidentiality’, New Zealand Herald, 15 March 1995
Jellie, Dugald, ‘Switch on radio: why a courtroom drama defeated radio’, The Age (Melbourne), 25 May 1995, Green Guide 9
Jenish, D'arcy and Driedger, Sharon Doyle, ‘Legal lesson or soap opera?’ Maclean's (Toronto), 13 March 1995, p. 35
Johnston, Philip, ‘Judges denounce Blunkett's policy on asylum claims’, Daily Telegraph (London), 1 August 2003, p. 6
Johnston, Tony, ‘Crime and Punishment’, Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 13 December 1998, p. 6
‘Judge bars photographs, radio’, The Press (Christchurch), 24 May 1995
‘Judge gives warning over courtroom TV’, Sydney Morning Herald (Sydney), 21 August 1995
‘Judge limits cameras’, Northern Advocate (Whangarei), 19 May 1995
‘Judge outlaws court cameras’, Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 8 October 1995
‘Judge sticks to TV only’, Evening Standard (Palmerston North), 24 May 1995
‘Judge suggests TV execution’, Weekend Australian (Melbourne), 26 July 1994, p. 14
‘Judges more favourable toward camera coverages; three year experiment ends’, Legal Intelligencer (Philadelphia), 17 November 1993, p. 5
‘Judges will be under microscope’, New Zealand Herald, 15 October 2003, p. A18
‘Judging genocide’, The Economist, 16 June 2001, p. 27
‘Judicial Conference turns down TV radio coverage of Federal Courts’, Communications Daily (Washington), 22 September 1994, p. 3
Judicial Council of California, ‘Cameras in courtroom, juries are focus of latest justice reforms’, Court News (California), December–January 1995–96, p. 1
Judicial Council of California,‘Revised cameras rule reaffirms judicial discretion’, Court News, 1996, p. 4
‘Jury in Oakes murder trial misdirected court told’, Dominion (Wellington), 15 March 1995
‘Jury reveals racial conflict in legal system’, The Australian (Brisbane), 5 October 1995, p. 7
‘Jury to tour massacre site’, West Australian (Perth), 10 February 1999
‘Justice after the OJ Simpson trial’, Weekend Australian (Melbourne), 7–8 October 1995
‘Justice should be seen to be done’, Independent (London), 30 June 1995
Kerin, John and Towers, Katherine, ‘Judge in attack on threat to judiciary’, Weekend Australian (Melbourne), 15–16 October 1994, p. 9
‘Kicking cameras out of courtrooms’, Chicago Tribune (Chicago), 23 September 1994, p. 20
‘Kidnap wife sought justice’, The Australian (Melbourne), 25 October 1994
‘Kobe in the dock: yet another “Trial of the Century” is gearing up’, The Economist, 18 October 2003, p. 34
Kotanides, John Jr, ‘Justice falls in McVeigh delay’, USA Today (New York), 17 May 2001, p. 14A
Krum, Sharon, ‘Lucrative trials of court cable’, The Australian (Melbourne), 9 November 1994, p. 20
Lagan, Bernard, ‘Courting controversy’, Bulletin (Sydney), 14 October 2003, p. 28
Lampers, Michael N., ‘Keep those cameras out of the Supreme Court’, USA Today (New York), 6 December 2000, p. 24A
‘Land case to resume’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 6 January 1997, p. 7
Landesman, Cosmo, ‘Courage of her conviction’, The Australian (Perth), 11 September 1998, p. 13
Lane, Bernard, ‘TV coming to a court near you, says Kirby’, The Australian (Brisbane), 18 August 1997
Lane, Bernard,‘High Court “needs media voice” ’, The Australian (Perth), 11 May 1998, p. 5
Lane, Bernard,‘High Court tests case for Net’, The Australian (Perth), 7 December 1999, p. 3
Laugesen, Ruth, ‘PM predicts Maori move to national structure’, Dominion (Wellington), 15 March 1995
‘Law Lord attacks asylum rethink’, West Australian (Perth), 5 March 2004, p. 26
Lawson, Mark, ‘Smoke that lingers: it's the media – not the courts – that decide guilt or innocence’, Guardian (London), 2 August 2003, p. 21
‘Lawyers cheer court use of tape-recorders’, The Australian (Melbourne), 21 May 1992
‘Lawyers fear effect of television on trials’, Nelson Evening Mail (New Zealand), 1 April 1995
‘Lawyers fear effect of TV cameras in courtrooms’, The News (Westport), 31 March 1995
Laxon, Andrew, ‘Police call to end televised trials’, New Zealand Herald, 24 March 1995
Laxon, Andrew,‘Court TV trial to continue’, New Zealand Herald, 25 March 1995, p. 1
Le Grand, Chip, ‘Rash trio forces lethal to rethink TV’, The Australian (Perth), 25 May 2004, p. 18
Legalbrief News Diary, ‘Sport: King Inquiry runs into obstacles’, Legalbrief News Diary (Durban), 2003
Legge, Kate, ‘Sensationalism dominates justice via cable network’, The Australian (Sydney), 2 August 1991, p. 6
Leonard, Tom, ‘Hutton Inquiry television ban’, Daily Telegraph (London), 6 August 2003, p. 4
‘Let public discuss new court’, New Zealand Herald (Auckland), 11 December 2002, p. A18
‘Letter to editor: the public needs TV to oversee the courts’, New York Times, 26 September 1994
Lewis, J., ‘Jurors fly to Belarus to study “war crimes” site’, Guardian Weekly (Manchester), 21 February 1999, p. 8
Lewis, Robert, ‘Tabloid journalism?’ Maclean's (Toronto), 24 January 1994, p. 2
‘Lights, Camera, Action at Parramatta’ (2004) 4(6) Courtside: Newsletter of the Family Court of Australia 1
Linklater, Magnus, ‘Court on camera: justice done’, The Times (London), November 1994, p. 18
Lipski, Sam, ‘Azaria case reflects journalism's worst – and best’, Bulletin (Sydney), 25 February 1986, p. 86
Lloyd, Megan, ‘People assured of easy access and their say in Environment Resources Development Court’, City Messenger (Adelaide), 17 July 1996, p. 15
‘Lockerbie defense tries to shift blame in trial’, USA Today (New York), 6 December 2000, p. 22A
‘Lords query overhaul of legal system’, West Australian (Perth), 10 March 2004, p. 30
Lose, Joseph, ‘Crim-cams win over lawyers’, Sunday News (New Zealand), 26 March 1995
Louisson, Simon, ‘OJ trial casts doubt on court TV plans’, Evening Post (Wellington), 11 October 1995
Lusetich, Robert, ‘A nation is glued to screens as LA Law meets the Simpsons’, Weekend Australian (Melbourne), 2–3 July 1994, p. 12
Lusetich, Robert,‘Bobbitt stars in uncut porn movie’, The Australian (Melbourne), 3 September 1994
Lusetich, Robert,‘OJ acquittal splits nation’, The Australian (Melbourne), 5 October 1995, p. 1
Lusetich, Robert,‘OJ and the morning after’, The Australian (Melbourne), 5 October 1995, p. 9
Lusetich, Robert,‘No, no nanny’, Weekend Australian (Melbourne), 15–16 November 1997, p. 21
Lyons, John, ‘Showtime for justice’, The Australian Magazine (Melbourne), 21–22 May 1994, p. 12
Lytle, Jeffrey F., ‘Supreme Court should allow live coverage during its election hearings’, Moscow-Pullman Daily News (Moscow, Idaho), 29 November 2000, p. 6A
Macintyre, Ben, ‘A tragedy in black and white’, The Australian (Melbourne), 6 October 1995, p. 14
Mackenzie, Kate, ‘Digital recorders will change the way we watch TV’, The Australian (Perth), 4 December 2002, p. 7
Maclennan, Catriona, ‘Women in the law battle for equality’, Dominion (Wellington), 15 March 1995
MacLeod, Murdo, ‘Top advocate calls for TV cameras to roll in Scott courts’, Scotland on Sunday (Glasgow), 30 June 2002, p. 8
Madigan, Michael, ‘Boat people find new way to Australia’, Courier Mail (Brisbane), 17 September 2001, p. 3
Malatesta, Grace, ‘Trial in style in new courts’, West Australian (Perth), 9 April 1999
Malatesta, Grace,‘Video justice spans two nations’, West Australian (Perth), 5 June 1999, p. 12
Malatesta, Grace,‘Courts put on bad face, says Report’, West Australian (Perth), 8 June 1999, p. 10
Malatesta, Grace,‘WA wins with innovative software’, West Australian (Perth), 8 June 1999, p. 10
Malatesta, Grace,‘Long arm of the law learns digital tricks’, West Australian (Perth), 4 August 1999, p. 26
Malatesta, Grace,‘Media accused of unfair judge attacks’, West Australian (Perth), 7 August 1999, p. 32
Mara, Carol, ‘Is this justice?’ The Australian Magazine (Melbourne), 28–29 October 1995, p. 39
Martin, Roger, ‘Foss moves to make life harder for court nuisances’, West Australian (Perth), 26 September 1998, p. 32
Mason, Hon. Anthony, ‘Justice on the screen’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 12 June 1995, p. 29
Mathieson, Clive, ‘Digital TV in every house IT networks win frequencies’, The Australian (Melbourne), 10 February 1998, p. 8
Mathieson, Clive,‘Alston holds the control in TV's Brave New World’, The Australian (Melbourne), 9 March 1998
Mathieson, Clive,‘Unlikely allies to fight digital TV monopoly’, The Australian (Melbourne), 12 March 1998, p. 4
Mathieson, Clive,‘Digital signals channel diversity on public TV’, The Australian (Melbourne), 26 March 1998
Mauro, Tony, ‘Cameras to come out of Federal Courts’, USA Today (New York), 21 September 1994, p. 1
McDonnell, Dan, ‘Receptive to Change’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 8 February 1994, p. 13
McGrath, John, ‘Tribunal TV raises “Judge Judy” fear’, West Australian (Perth), 24 January 2004, p. 190
McGregor, Richard and Balogh, Stefanie, ‘Colston will “die before he faces court” ’, Weekend Australian (Perth), 1–2 May 1999, p. 3
McGuiness, Padraic P., ‘All things being equal, justice must be seen to be done’, The Age (Melbourne), 25 February 1995, p. 23
McLennan, David, ‘High Court decisions must be open to dialogue – Professor Michael Coper’, Canberra Times (Canberra), 22 September 2003, p. 7
McNair, Brian, ‘Counterblast’, Sunday Herald (Sydney), 12 December 1999
McNeil, Wayne, ‘TV turns justice into soap opera’, New Zealand Herald, 25 March 1995
McNicoll, D. D., ‘Conventional wisdom’, The Australian (Melbourne), 26 January 1998
Meade, Amanda, ‘Where the bucks stop’, The Australian (Melbourne), 2 December 1999, p. 11
Meade, Kevin and Hart, Cath, ‘Judge demands trial Web blackout’, The Australian (Perth), 26 January 2005, p. 3
‘Media banned from court hearing’, Gold Coast Bulletin, 29 April 1997, p. 12
Meertens, Grace, ‘Chief Justice defends bench’, West Australian (Perth), 4 August 1998, p. 6
Meertens, Grace,‘Survey finds public unhappy with courts’, West Australian (Perth), 5 September 1998, p. 39
Meertens, Grace,‘Media “threat” to role of judges’, West Australian (Perth), 18 September 1998, p. 26
Meertens, Grace,‘WA's top judge attacks human rights abuse in Asia’, West Australian (Perth), 24 September 1998, p. 30
‘Melba’, The Australian (Brisbane), 25 March 1997, Features 11
Merritt, Chris, ‘Hearsay’, Australian Financial Review (Perth), 5 May 2000 2000, p. 36
Meryment, Elizabeth, Morley, Peter and Metcalf, Fran, ‘Goss's CJC Review “eyed core duties” ’, Courier Mail (Brisbane), 21 February 1997
Messina, Alex, ‘Tricky first hour for Chief Magistrate’, The Age (Melbourne), 25 November 1993, p. 7
Messina, Alex,‘Lights, Camera, Action: they're in court and so are you’, The Age (Melbourne), 7 July 1994, p. 1
Messina, Alex,‘Must justice be seen?’ The Age (Melbourne), 8 July 1994, p. 9
Messina, Alex,‘Federal Court to consider TV move’, The Age (Melbourne), 15 July 1994, p. 7
Messina, Alex and Bruer, Mark, ‘A court in camera’, The Age (Melbourne), 3 February 1994, p. 11
Michaels, Julie, ‘Law in the Age of Images’, Boston College Law School Magazine, Fall 2000, p. 19
Michelmore, Karen, ‘NT Government spends $1 m on Falconio case’, Australian Associated Press, 22 April 2004
Milburn, Caroline, ‘Televise High Court: Sir Ninian’, The Age (Melbourne), 20 August 1998, p. 5
Milligan, Louise, ‘Courting danger’, The Australian (Perth), 13–19 November 2003, p. 4
Milligan, Louise,‘Top judge says electronic age risks right to fair trial’, Weekend Australian (Perth), 29–30 November 2003, p. 7
Milligan, Louise,‘Rape call broadcast criticised’, The Australian (Perth), 4–10 December 2003, p. 3
Mills, Kelly, ‘Oracle holds court with casetrack’, The Australian (Perth), 26 November 2002, p. 8
Montgomery, Bruce, ‘Law's Net revolution has beaks surfing’, The Australian (Perth), 31 August 1999, p. 33
Morris, Rachel, ‘Evidence points to regular court TV’, Daily Telegraph (London), 3 September 1999, p. 7
‘Mother says no to trial coverage’, Daily Post (Rotorua), 27 April 1995
‘Motoring case used as TV practice run’, Gisborne Herald (Gisborne), 15 March 1995
Mottram, Murray, Butcher, Steve and Gray, Darren, ‘Putting the County Court on trial’, Sunday Age (Melbourne), 19 November 1995, p. 8
‘Nanny jury fury: poll rejects guilt verdict’, Sunday Mail (London), 2 November 1997, p. 6
‘NATO action is genocide, Belgrade tells UN Court’, The Australian (Perth) 12 May 1999, p. 23
‘Net gets verdict’, The Australian (Perth), 2 August 1999, p. 2
‘New Lord Chancellor urges end to restraints: “judges should be permitted to speak out” ’, The Times (London), 4 November 1987, p. 3
New York Daily News, ‘Will the Unreal OJ Please Rise?’ Herald Sun, 5 January 1997
Newsday, ‘A year on, OJ melodrama shakes the faith’, The Age (Melbourne), 12 June 1995
‘Newspapers out of court’, Wairato Times (Hamilton), 19 May 1995
Nickerson, C., ‘Canadian puts the joke on US’, Boston Globe (Boston), 29 May 2001, p. 1
‘No TV camera at trial’, Wairarapa Times (New Zealand), 28 April 1995
Norton-Taylor, Richard, ‘Your inquisitor awaits, Mr Blair’, Guardian (London), 2 August 2003, p. 1
Noyes, Pete, ‘Court cameras should obey the rules’, Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles), 8 April 1996, p. 73
‘Obituaries, Anna Hauptmann’, The Age (Melbourne), 20 October 1994, p. 16
‘Occupation must end’, Evening Post (Wellington), 14 March 1995
O'Hagan, Maureen, ‘Bid to close hearing in B.C. killings is denied’, Seattle Times (Seattle), 7 December 2002
‘OJKO as pilot allow cameras into Court of Appeal,’ Law Gazette (London), 9 September 2004, www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/pressroundup/view=newsarticle.law?GAZETTENEWSID=191539 at 25 April 2007
‘OJ's trial by media’, Maclean's (Toronto), 31 October 1994, p. 39
‘Old Bailey in Belarus’, The Australian (Perth), 18 February 1999, p. 8
Oldfield, Stewart and Gregory, Peter, ‘Elliott criticises Yorta Claim’, The Age (Melbourne), 31 October 1996
‘Opponents of camera ban pleased by Report’, Legal Intelligencer (Washington), 23 November 1993, p. 5
Palmer, Scot, ‘OJ proves time is right for tribunal TV’, Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne), 8 October 1995, p. 51
Papas, Nicholas, ‘Sentencing is not that simple’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 5 February 1996
‘Pay-TV court channel possibility in Australia, says Magistrate’, The Press (Christchurch), 20 May 1995
Phillips, John, ‘Milosevic trial stops nation in its tracks’, The Australian (Perth), 14 February 2002, p. 8
‘Photos, radio banned at trial’, Wairato Times (Hamilton), 24 May 1995
Plane, Terry, ‘Suppression city courts secrecy’, The Australian (Perth), 14 November 2001, p. 12
‘Police raise concerns about televised trials’, Ashburton Guardian (New Zealand), 24 March 1995
‘Police speak against cameras in courtrooms’, Dominion (Wellington), 25 March 1995
‘Police want television ban in court’, The Press (Christchurch), 25 March 1995
Power, Samantha, ‘Iraqis should see tyrant's trial up close’, The Australian (Perth), 1 January 2004, p. 11
‘Power shifts to the judges’, Guardian (London), 11 September 2000
Price, Matt, ‘The $44 m battle in courtroom 11’, The Australian (Perth), 18 March 1999, p. 1
Price, Matt,‘Ambush’, The Australian (Perth), 30 October 2003, p. 4
‘Public to peer at new look House of Lords’, West Australian (Perth), 21 January 1999
Purves, Libby, ‘Where is the justice when TV moves in?’, The Times (London), 15 November 1994
‘Radio, photos, banned at trial’, Dominion (Wellington), 24 May 1995
Ramsey, Andrew, ‘Televised hearings plan gets the flick’, The Australian (Perth), 12 December 2001, p. 22
Ratnesar, Romesh, ‘The end of the line’, Time, 9 July 2001, p. 18
Rayner, Moira, ‘Requirements of justice weigh heavily on society's shoulders’, The Age (Melbourne), 15 June 1994, p. 20
Reed, Christopher, ‘Lawyers, lies and videotape’, The Age (Melbourne), 24 September 1993
Reed, Christopher,‘Simpson trial judge lured by the sirens of the screen’, The Age (Melbourne), 18 November 1994, p. 12
Reed, Christopher,‘“Dream team” faces jury probe’, Sunday Age (Melbourne), 8 October 1995, p. 13
Reed, David, ‘WA public can be Net judges’, West Australian (Perth), 6 March 2000, p. 7
Reeves, Phil, ‘OJ: made for TV’, The Age (Melbourne), 17 October 1994, p. 11
‘Right calls on Callinan’, Australian Financial Review (Perth), 22 July 1998, p. 16
Robb, Trevor, ‘Button's long wait nears end’, West Australian (Perth), 23 February 2002, p. 13
Robertson, Geoffrey, QC, ‘Court on candid camera’, Evening Standard (London), 28 September 2000
Robinson, Paul, ‘Contempt of court’, The Age (Melbourne), 12 June 2000, p. 13
Robinson, Paul,‘Federal Court “vendetta” claim’, The Age (Melbourne), 12 June 2000, p. 2
Rodell, Fred, ‘TV or no TV in court?’, New York Times Magazine, 12 April 1964, p. 16
Rollins, Adrian, ‘Australian Broadcasting Corporation first to unveil plans for digital TV’, The Age (Melbourne), 2 September 1998
Rooney, John Flynn, ‘Panel OKs cameras in US Appeals Courts; seen as unlikely here’, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (Chicago), 13 March 1996, p. 2
Rosenberg, Howard, ‘Please stay tuned for “execution of the week” ’, The Age (Melbourne), 30 April 24
Ross, Michael, ‘Lorena Bobbitt acquitted in mutilation of husband’, Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles), 22 January 1994, p. 1
Rowling, Bill, ‘Courtroom or theatre?’, Nelson Evening Mail (New Zealand), 31 March 1995
Rozenberg, Joshua, ‘We must have a Justice Minister’, Daily Telegraph (London), 12 June 2001, p. 16
Rozenberg, Joshua,‘Woolf to delay retirement over legal reforms’, Daily Telegraph (London), 1 August 2003, p. 6
‘Rule of law relies on a free press’, The Australian (Perth), 24 August 2001, p. 12
‘Ruling asserts public access to court papers’, The Australian (Brisbane), 17 October 1997, p. 2
‘Saddam to be tried in absentia’, The Australian (Perth), 12 December 2003, p. 7
Sage, Adam, ‘Bullying and delays blight Hague Tribunal’, Weekend Australian (Perth), 6–7 July 2002, p. 17
Satterly, Mark, ‘Grusome details’, Maclean's (Toronto), 12 June 1995, p. 4
Saunders, David, ‘Televising of the courts wins cautious approval’, The Age (Melbourne), 31 January 1994
Savill, R., ‘Coroner wants TV at drug inquests’, Daily Telegraph (London), 12 June 2001, p. 13
Schmidt, Robert, ‘Federal judges defer decision on cameras in the courtroom’, Legal Times (Detroit), 13 December 1993, p. 21
Schmidt, Robert,‘What's next for cameras?’, Legal Times (Detroit), 9 June 1997, p. 1
Schmitz, Cristin, ‘Judicial Council divided over TV cameras in court “it's like working in a juristic Jurassic Park” says critic’ (2001) 21 Lawyers Weekly (Ontario)
Schmitz, Cristin,‘Ontario's Chief Justice rejects televising trial proceedings’ (2003) 22 Lawyers Weekly (Ontario)
Schulze, Jane, ‘Broadband booted ahead by the AFL’, The Australian (Perth), 24 September 2001, p. 28
Schulze, Jane,‘A digital dead-end’, The Australian (Perth), 5–11 June 2003, p. 3
Scott, Jodie, ‘Who weekly faces contempt charges’, The Australian (Melbourne), 8 June 1994, p. 2
Scott, Jodie,‘Australian Broadcasting Corporation Radio faces contempt charge’, The Australian (Melbourne), 10 June 1994
Scutt, Jocelynne, ‘Denial of the century’, Sunday Age (Melbourne), 8 October 1995
Seenan, Gerard, ‘The British Broadcasting Corporation can show Lockerbie appeal’, Guardian (London), 10 January 2002, p. 4
Sengupta, Kim and Vallely, Paul, ‘The dossier is damned again’, Independent (London), 12 August 2003, p. 1
‘Sex case prosecution time limit possible’, Evening Standard (Palmerston North), 13 March 1995
‘Shaming criminals not the answer’, Canberra Times (Canberra), 23 February 1997
Shearer, Harry, ‘Freak show’, The Age (Melbourne), 6 February 1997, p. A11
Sheehan, Paul, ‘The contempt is mutual, Your Honour’, Sydney Morning Herald (Sydney), 8 March 2004
Simon, Stephanie and Newton, Jim, ‘Judge bans cameras from Simpson trial’, Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles), 24 August 1996, p. 1
Simons, Marlise, ‘Trial reopens pain of 1995 Bosnian massacre’, New York Times (New York), 7 November 2000, p. A3
Simper, Errol, ‘Technology on trial when reporters take liberties in camera’, Weekend Australian (Melbourne), 8–9 August 1992, p. 22
Simper, Errol,‘Aunty finds time for a good cause’, The Australian (Melbourne), 5 February 1998
Simper, Errol,‘Live laws coverage dims’, The Australian (Perth), 21 September 1999, p. 4
Simper, Errol,‘Gallery's old masters given new orders’, The Australian (Perth), 13 June 2002, p. 4
Simper, Errol,‘Acquittal’, The Australian (Melbourne), 30 July 2004, ‘The Australian 40 Years: Heroes and Villains’ 14
‘Simpson case backlash keeps cameras out of other courtrooms’, New York Times (New York), 17 September 1995, p. 35
‘Simpson: judge maintains his gag order’, Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles), 24 August 1996, p. A1
Skeggs, Phil, ‘Warriors buried in forest’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 30 October 1996
Sketch, Melissa, ‘Poise in the face of polemic’, The Times (London), 2 August 2003, p. 4
Smith, Hugh, ‘Is the humanitarian war breaking global law?’, The Australian (Perth), 12 May 1999, p. 27
Smith, Michael, Laville, Sandra and Tweedie, Neil, ‘MOD tried to burn Kelly “media plan”’, Daily Telegraph (London), 2 August 2003, p. 1
Smyth, Chris, ‘Televised trials reveal justice’, The Australian (Perth), June 12–18 2003, p. 7
‘State studies cited; Judicial Conference turns down TV-Radio coverage of Federal Courts’, Communications Daily (Washington), 22 September 1994, p. 3
Steele, John, ‘I've been to hell and back but justice prevailed, says Leslie’, Daily Telegraph (London), 1 August 2003, p. 1
Steele, John,‘Tears of relief: TV presenter breaks down as sex charges dropped’, Daily Telegraph (London), 1 August 2003, p. 1
Stein, Joel, ‘Here come the judges’, Time, 24 August 1998, p. 70
Steketee, Mike, ‘Politicians bar mug shots’, The Australian (Perth), 11 October 2001, p. 8
Stephens, Mark, ‘Justice on the box? The televising of trials panders to the current trend for true-life crimes rather than showing the reality’ (1994) 91 Law Society's Gazette (London) 2
Stevens, Matthew, ‘Amnesty Law Lord resists calls to quit’, The Australian (Perth), 18 January 1999
Stevens, Matthew,‘Reclusive nanny heads for court’, The Australian (Perth), 18 January 1999, p. 3
Stewart, Cameron, ‘Scales of justice: jail for life, then freedom’, The Australian (Brisbane), 12 November 1997, p. 12
Stutchbury, Michael, ‘Free speech proves costly’, Weekend Australian (Perth), 6–7 December 2003, p. 18
Sulkovsky, G., ‘Old Baily in Belarus’, The Australian (Perth), 18 February 1999, p. 8
‘Supreme Court decision was another in long line of injustices’, Moscow-Pullman Daily News (Moscow, Idaho), 23 February 2001, p. 7A
Sutcliffe, Thomas, ‘May justice be done, and be seen to be done’, Independent (London), 3 August 1994, p. 14
Sutherland, Tracy, ‘Conducting his own trial’, Weekend Australian Magazine (Perth), 13–14 July 2002, p. 9
Tame, Adrian and Hewitt, Sue, ‘I know the fate of Azaria’, Sunday Times (Perth), 4 July 2004, p. 1
Te Koha, N., ‘Judge Judy packs a punch’, West Australian (Perth), 1 February 1999, p. 3
Telegraph Group, ‘Photographer called in over Jackson shots’, West Australian (Perth), 16 November 2002, p. 22
‘Televised Bain trial “of little benefit” ’, Gisborne Herald (New Zealand), 27 April 1995
‘Televised trial opposed’, Nelson Evening Mail (New Zealand), 27 April 1995
‘Televised trials may place witnesses at risk: police’, Evening Post (Wellington), 24 March 1995
‘Televising Bernardo’, Maclean's (Toronto), 20 February 1995, p. 17
‘Test for court TV’, Evening Post (Wellington), 15 March 1995
‘Test run for court trials on television’, Bay of Plenty Times (Tauranga), 15 March 1995
‘The jungle of crime’, The Press (Christchurch), 15 March 1995
‘The trouble with the British Broadcasting Corporation’, The Economist, 20 September 2003, p. 44
Thorp, Diana, ‘Take the chance to learn your constitutional Australian Broadcasting Corporation’, The Australian (Brisbane), 30 January 1998, p. 6
‘Three Bosnian Serbs convicted of rape and torture’, Moscow-Pullman Daily News (Moscow, Idaho), 22 February 2001, p. 4A
Tippet, Gary, ‘Papas reverses court TV move’, Sunday Age (Melbourne), 28 August 1994, p. 4
Toohey, Paul, ‘Witch hunt’, The Australian (Perth), 15 July 2000
Toohey, Paul,‘Under pressure for not throwing away the key’, Weekend Australian (Perth), 28–29 June 2003, p. 18
Toohey, Paul,‘Why Lindy must wait for justice’, Bulletin (Sydney), 20 July 2004, p. 20
Towers, Katherine, ‘Trial radio replay bid to demystify law’, The Australian (Brisbane), 5 February 1997
Towers, Katherine,‘Judgement day for historic court’, Weekend Australian (Brisbane), 29–30 August 1998, p. 11
‘Trial by media: the Leslie case raises key questions’, Guardian (London), 1 August 2003, p. 25
‘Trial by video lesson’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 5 November 1996, p. 54
Tunnah, Helen, ‘Highest court can review NZ Court of Appeal judgements’, New Zealand Herald (Auckland), 10 October 2003
Tunnah, Helen,‘Petition last bid to save UK appeals’, New Zealand Herald (Auckland), 10 October 2003, p. 1
Tunnah, Helen,‘“Show Ponies” will gut judiciary’, Weekend Herald (Auckland), 18–19 October 2003, p. A5
Tunnah, Helen and Berry, Ruth, ‘Labour's legal steamroller’, New Zealand Herald (Auckland), 9 October 2003, p. 1
Turner, Lisa, ‘Court cameras pass first test’, New Zealand Herald, 15 March 1995
Turner, Marnie, ‘Judge Hall invites his critics to court’, Gold Coast Bulletin, 22 January 1998
Turner, Marnie,‘Judge Hall: let's talk about sentences’, Gold Coast Bulletin, 22 January 1998, p. 1
Turner, Marnie,‘Judge Hall angered by TV ambush’, Gold Coast Bulletin, 29 January 1998, p. 10
‘TV but no photos for Barlow trial’, Dominion (Wellington), 19 May 1995
‘TV cameras barred from Federal Courts’, Chicago Tribune (Chicago), 22 September 1994, p. 3
‘TV cameras in court a first’, Hawkes Bay Herald Tribune, 14 March 1995
‘TV channels vie for court screenings’, Dominion (Wellington), 4 March 1995, p. 1
‘TV eyes Bain trial’, Dominion (Wellington), 27 April 1995
‘TV firms scrap plans to film trial’, The Press (Christchurch), 29 May 1995
‘TV pulls out’, Evening Post (Wellington), 27 May 1995
‘TVNZ has bid to film Bain trial rejected’, Gisborne Herald, 28 April 1995
‘TVNZ seeks exemption to film Dunedin multiple-murder trial’, The Press (Christchurch), 27 April 1995
‘TVNZ wants to film Bain murder trial’, Evening Standard (Palmerston North), 27 April 1995
‘TVNZ wants to film Bain trial’, Westport, 27 April 1995
‘TV's court debut alarms Australia’, New Zealand Herald, 17 May 1995
Tweedie, Neil, ‘Hutton pledges to leave no stone unturned in hunt for truth behind death of Dr Kelly’, Daily Telegraph (London), 2 August 2003, p. 4
‘UN Court rejects ceasefire plea’, West Australian (Perth), 3 June 1999, p. 20
Van Beynen, Martin, ‘TV firms subdued over filming trials’, The Press (Christchurch), 22 February 1995, p. 5
Van Beynen, Martin,‘Court on TV fails to impress Law Society’, The Press (Christchurch), 16 March 1995
Van Tilburg, E. G. Q., ‘A case for civility’, Maclean's (Toronto), 18 July 1994, p. 4
Varadarajan, Tunku and Bone, James, ‘Nanny's fate rests on judge's conscience’, The Australian (Brisbane), 6 November 1997, p. 10
Vecchio, Mary Ann, ‘Double exposure’, Who (Milsons Point, NSW), 30 October 1995, p. 38
‘Victoria investigates televising of court proceedings’, Australian Current Law News, 4 February 1999
‘Video judges reach verdict’, West Australian (Perth), 28 June 1999, p. 7
‘Voteline results’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 19 September 2001, p. 19
Walker, Tony, ‘Kennedy rape trial takes TV to its intrusive worst’, The Age (Melbourne), 14 December 1991, p. 14
Walker, Tony,‘The debate on the Fourth Estate’, Australian Financial Review, 8 March 2002, p. 75
Wall Street Journal Staff Reporter, ‘High Court won't allow broadcast of election cases’, Wall Street Journal, 28 November 2000, p. A16
Warby, Michael, ‘Stop meddling with the media’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 23 December 1998, p. 19
Warneke, Ross, ‘The case for and against court TV’, The Age (Melbourne), 7 December 1995, p. 4
Webster, Sean, ‘Year-long struggle allows TV only restricted view of the courtroom’, Independent (London), 16 November 1994
Weinstein, Henry, ‘More judges expected to ban cameras in court’, Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles), 14 July 1996, p. B1
Wells, Matt, ‘A tabloid exclusive and Sky One deal: the rebuilding of a tarnished name’, Guardian (London), 1 August 2003, p. 3
Wells, Matt and Dyer, Clare, ‘First step to put cameras into courtroom’, Guardian (London), 17 November 2003
Whittell, Giles, ‘OJ is free, but US justice system remains in the dock’, The Australian (Melbourne), 5 October 1995, p. 11
‘Wilentz demands suppression of newsreels taken by trickery during trial sessions’, New York Times (New York), 2 February 1935, p. 1
Williams, Daryl, ‘Judges must put up their own defence’, Australian Financial Review (Perth), 27 April 2001, p. 57
Williams, Sue, ‘“Cagney and Lacey” of the Falconio case’, The Australian (Perth), 28 May 2004, p. 2
Wilson, Adam, ‘Television is a “disease” ’, Moscow-Pullman Daily News (Moscow, Idaho), 19 April 2001, p. 1
Wilson, Caroline, ‘AFL closer to live cover of tribunal’, The Australian (Perth), 6 May 2004, p. 67
Wilson, Peter, ‘Judge keeps tight rein on McVeigh trial’, The Australian (Brisbane), 3 April 1997, p. 6
Wilson, Peter,‘A law unto themselves’, Weekend Australian (Perth), 6 July 2002, p. 23
Wintour, Patrick, ‘Broadcasters want Kelly Inquiry shown live’, Guardian (London), 1 August 2003, p. 10
Wintour, Patrick and Dyer, Clare, ‘Reshuffle ends job as Lord Chancellor’, Guardian Weekly (Manchester), 19–25 June 2003, p. 8
‘Witness leads jury tour of killing site’, West Australian (Perth), 18 February 1999, p. 21
Wood, Mark, ‘Let us show the full picture’, Independent Review (London), 12 August 2003, p. 10
Woodley, Brian, ‘Boys and girls come out to prey’, The Australian (Brisbane), 9 March 1998
Woods, James, Courier Mail (Brisbane), 19 December 1997
Yaffe, Deborah, ‘T.V. trial restrictions in California urged’, Recorder (US), 26 February 1996, p. 1
‘Yorta Yorta Land Claim lost last century: NSW’, West Australian (Perth), 25 August 1999, p. 45
Zdenkowski, George, ‘Why justice likes a gag and blindfold’, Bulletin (Sydney), 23 June 1992, p. 24
Zdenkowski, George,‘Cameras in court: justice must stay in the picture’, Sydney Morning Herald (Sydney), 23 June 1995, p. 19
A Reporters Guide to Applications pending before the Supreme Court of the United Stateswww.supremecourtus.gov/publicinfo/reportersguide.pdf at 25 April 2007
Australian Broadcasting Corporation Radio National, The Law Report, Court Radio: the Verdict and Legal Aid (1997), www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/8.30/lawrpt/lstories/lr970218.htm at 25 April 2007
Australian Broadcasting Corporation Radio National,The Law Report, Court Radio Part One: the Prosecution Case (1997), www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/8.30/lawrpt/lstories/lr970204.htm at 25 April 2007
Australian Broadcasting Corporation Radio National,The Law Report, Court Radio Part Two: the Defence Case (1997), www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/8.30/lawrpt/lstories/lr970211.htm at 25 April 2007
Australian Broadcasting Corporation Radio National,The Law Report, How Courts Interact with the Media, 10 November 1998, www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/8.30/lawrpt/lstories/lr981110.htm at 25 April 2007
Australian Broadcasting Corporation Radio National,The Law Report, Chronological Index of Transcripts and Summaries (2000), www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/8.30/lawrpt/index/LawReportChronoIdx2000.htm at 25 April 2007
Australian Broadcasting Corporation Radio National,The World Today, Nationals Divided Over One Nation Preferences, 4 September 2001
Australian Broadcasting Corporation Radio National,The Law Report, Inside the High Court, 7 October 2003, www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/8.30/lawrpt/stories/s959203.htm at 25 April 2007
Ad Idem, Electronic Public Access to Court, www.adidem.org/position/Epabc.shtml at 25 April 2007
Administrative Office of the US Courts, Background on Cameras in the Federal Courts, www.judges.org/nccm/research/court_media_rules/admin_office_u_s_cts_cameras.htm at 25 April 2007
Advocates in Defense of Expression in the Media, New Developments, http://adidem.org/index.shtml at 25 April 2007
Australian Broadcasting Authority, News Release: 7 February 2000 American Bar Association; Australian Bar Association Decides to Impose License Conditions on 2UE Sydney (2000), www.aba.gov.au/newspubs/news_releases/archive/2000/7nr2000.shtml at 25 April 2007
Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Australian Broadcasting Corporation Coverage (1998), www.abc.net.au/concon/bcast/default.htm at 25 April 2007
Australian Broadcasting Corporation,Con Con (1998), www.abc.net.au/concon at 25 April 2007
British Broadcasting Corporation Bristol Head Office, ‘The OJ Simpson Trial’, Press Release, 2 September 1994
British Broadcasting Corporation News, ‘Court TV Plan Under Way, 27 December 2000’, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1089017.stm at 25 April 2007
Becker, Judge Edward, Statement of Chief Judge Edward R Becker on behalf of the Judicial Conference of the United States, Administrative Office of the United States Courts (2000), www.uscourts.gov/Press_Releases/becker.pdf at 25 April 2007
Bender, Jay, Cameras in Courts Update, South Carolina Broadcasters Association, www.scba.net/CamerasinCourts.htm at 25 April 2007
Blom-Cooper, Sir Louis, Broadcasting Courts Seminar: Speech by Sir Louis Blom-Cooper QC, Department for Constitutional Affairs (2005), www.dca.gov.uk/consult/courts/speeches/blom-cooper.htm at 25 April 2007
Boyd QC, Colin, ‘The Media, the Public and the Judicial Process: the Kenneth Younger Memorial Lecture’, paper presented at the Playfair Library, Old College, University of Edinburgh, 19 February 2002
Brenner, Donald I., Chief Justice, ‘Televised Court Proceedings’, Press Release, 18 April 2001
British Broadcasting Corporation, Petitioners (No. 1) (High Ct) Scots Law Times 2000, 845, 847 para. 2; British Broadcasting Corporation, Petitioners No. 1 2000 JC 419
British Broadcasting Corporation,Petitioners (No. 2) (High Ct) Scots Law Times 2000, 860
British Broadcasting Corporation,Watch/ Listen to Lockerbie Appeal (2002), http://news.British Broadcasting Corporation.co.UK/1/hi/world/1766508.stm at 25 April 2007
Bryant, Hon. Diana, Chief Justice of the Family Court of Australia, ‘Beyond the Horizon: State of Family Law and the Family Court of Australia’, speech delivered at the Law Council of Australia, Family Law Section, Eleventh National Family Law Conference, Gold Coast, 27 September 2004
Bryant, Hon. Diana, Chief Justice of the family Court of Australia,‘The Future of the Family Court’, speech delivered at the Third Annual Austin Asche Oration, 23 November 2004
Canadian Judicial Council, Council Modifies Position on Cameras in the Courts (2002), http://cjc-ccm.gc.ca/article.asp?id=2422 at 25 April 2007
Canadian Parliamentary Affairs Channel, Canadian Political Channel, www.cpac.ca/ at 25 April 2007
Canadian Parliamentary Affairs Channel,Jurisprudence (2004), www.cpac.ca/forms/index.asp?dsp=template&act=view3&template_id=185&lang=e at 25 April 2007
Catliff, Nick, ‘The Trial and the British Experience’, paper presented at the Cameras in the Courtroom Conference, Southampton Institute, 12 February 1999
CBC News, Media Fight for Access to Pickton Hearing (2002), www.cbc.ca/stories/2002/12/01/pickton_ban021201 at 25 April 2007
Chambers, Hon. Justice Robert, ‘TV in Courtrooms: the New Zealand Experience’, unpublished paper presented at the Australian Supreme and Federal Courts Judges’ Conference, Auckland, New Zealand, 25–29 January 2004
Channel 7, Through My Eyes, 23–24 November 2004
Chesterman, Michael, ‘Contemporary Issues in the Law of Contempt’, paper presented at the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Australian Institute of Judicial Administration, Hobart, 21–23 September 2001
Cooper, John, Broadcasting Courts Seminar: Speech by John Cooper, Department for Constitutional Affairs (2005), www.dca.gov.uk/consult/courts/speeches/cooper.htm at 25 April 2007
Coroner, Findings of Inquest, Court Administration Authority South Australia (2002), www.courts.sa.gov.au/courts/coroner/findings/findings_2002/kunmanara_hunt.finding.htm at 25 April 2007
Courts Consultative Committee, Draft Guidelines for Expanded Media Coverage of Court Proceedings (1999)
Courts Consultative Committee,Guidelines for Expanded Media Coverage of Court Proceedings (2000)
Courts Consultative Committee,2003 New Zealand Guidelines for Media Coverage of Court Proceedings (2003), www.courts.govt.nz/media/guidelines.html at 25 April 2007
CVT.ca, Pickton to be charged in seven more deaths (16 December 2003), www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1071515009457_9?s_name=&no_ads= at 25 April 2007
Darling, Lord (1924) HL Deb. vol. 56 col. 313
Department for Constitutional Affairs, Broadcasting Courts: a Consultation by the Department for Constitutional Affairs (November 2004), www.dca.gov.uk/consult/courts/broadcasting-cp28-04.htm at 25 April 2007
Department for Constitutional Affairs,Discussion Forum Topics (2005), www.dca.gov.uk/consult/courts/discuss/index.htm at 25 April 2007
Dyhrberg, Marie, ‘Television in the Courts: the Time has Come’, paper presented at the Sixth International Criminal Law Congress, Session 6: the Debate ‘TV or Not TV?’, Melbourne, 9–13 October 1996
Eggers, Vickie, ‘Full Stream Ahead: the Michigan Experience’, paper presented at the Court Technology Conference in Kansas City, 28–30 October 2003
Electronic Frontier Canada, www.efc.ca at 25 April 2007
Erica Smishek, Sensational Murder Trial Must Stay Open to Reporters, University of British Columbia Reports (2003), www.publicaffairs.ubc.ca/ubcreports/2003/03jan02/murdertrial.html at 25 April 2007
Falconer, Lord, Broadcasting Courts Seminar, Department of Constitutional Affairs www.dca.gov.uk/consult/courts/speeches/falconer.htm at 25 April 2007
Falconer, Lord,Broadcasting Courts Seminar: Introduction from Lord Falconer, Speech by Lord Falconer, the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs, Department for Constitutional Affairs (2005), www.dca.gov.uk/consult/courts/speeches/falconer.htm at 25 April 2007
Family Court of Australia, Media Centre (2004), www.familycourt.gov.au/presence/connect/www/home/about/media_centre/ at 25 April 2007
Federal Court of Australia and Law Council of Australia, Expert Witness Guidelines Developed Co-operatively by Federal Court and Law Council (1999) www.fedcourt.gov.au/aboutct/media01.html at 25 April 2007
Florida Supreme Court, Court Arguments in Video and Audio and Satellite Downlink, Supreme Court Public Information, www.floridasupremecourt.org/pub_info/index.shtml at 25 April 2007
French, Justice Robert, ‘Television and Radio Broadcasting in the Federal Court of Australia: a Personal Perspective’, paper presented via video link to Broadcasting Courts Seminar, London, 10 January 2005, Broadcasting Courts Seminar: Speech by Justice Robert French by videolink from the Federal Court of Australia, Perth, Department for Constitutional Affairs (2005), www.dca.gov.uk/consult/courts/speeches/french.htm at 25 April 2007
Gleeson, Hon. Justice Murray, ‘Public Confidence in the Courts’, paper presented at the National Judicial College of Australia, Confidence in the Courts Conference, Canberra, February 2007, www.highcourt.gov.av/speeches/cj/cj_9feb07.pdf at 14 April 2007
Global BC et al., ‘Appellant's Factum, R v Pilarinos and Clark’ Court File No. 28823 (2002), available at CBC News TV on Trial (2002)
Guidelines for Media and Public Access to the Courts in Nova Scotia (2004)
Hamish, Cameron, ‘The Televising of Court Proceedings in Australia’, unpublished paper, submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Research Project at the Law School of the University of Technology, Sydney (1999)
Harris, Vicki, Technology for Justice Conference Presentations, Australian Institute of Judicial Administration (CD ROM 1998)
Hope, Lord, ‘Television in the Scottish Courts’, paper presented at Meeting of Chief Justices and Attorneys-General of the European Union, Lisbon, May 1994
Hutton Inquiry, Press Notices: General Matters 24 July 2003 (2003), www.the-hutton-inquiry.org.uk/content/hi-pn240703.htm at 25 April 2007
Hutton Inquiry,Ruling by Lord Hutton (2003), www.the-hutton-inquiry.org.uk/content/rulings/ruling01.htm at 25 April 2007
Idaho State Judiciary, Idaho Administrative Rules, www.isc.idaho.gov/rules/icaridx.htm at 25 April 2007
Innes, Prue, Covering the Courts: a Basic Guide for Journalists, Supreme Court of Victoria (2004), http://supremecourt.vic.gov.au/CA256902000FE154/Lookup/Papers/$file/Covering%20the%20courtsV4Oct04.pdf at 25 April 2007
Internet Guide to the Idaho Courts (2003), www.isc.idaho.gov/media03.pdf at 25 April 2007
Jersey, Chief Justice Paul de, Practice Direction Number 4 of 2004, Supreme Court of Queensland, Recording Devices in Courtrooms, Supreme Court (2004), www.courts.qld.gov.au/practice/pracdir/sc2004_04.pdf at 25 April 2007
Joynson-Hicks, Sir William, Home Secretary (1924–1925) HC Deb. vol. 188 col. 849, 20 November 1925
Judge, Lord, Broadcasting Courts Seminar: Speech by Lord Justice Judge, Department for Constitutional Affairs (2005), www.dca.gov.uk/consult/courts/speeches/judge.htm at 25 April 2007
Judicial Council of California, Photographing, Recording, and Broadcasting in the Courtroom – Guidelines for Judicial Officers (1997)
Judicial Council of California,Camera in Court: Factsheet (June 2003), www.courtinfo.ca.gov/reference/4_25media.htm at 25 April 2007
Judicial Council of California Task Force on Photographing, Recording, and Broadcasting in the Courtroom, Photographing, Recording, and Broadcasting in the Courtroom: Guidelines for Judicial Officers (1997), www.courtinfo.ca.gov/reference/documents/photo.pdf at 25 April 2007
Kentucky Court of Justice, Video Courtrooms in Kentucky, http://courts.ky.gov/aoc/facilities/videocourt.htm at 25 April 2007
Kirby, Hon. Justice Michael, ‘What is it Really Like to be a Justice of the High Court of Australia? A Conversation of Law Students with Justice Kirby’, speech delivered at the Faculty of Law, University of Sydney, 23 May 1997, www.highcourt.gov.au/speeches/kirbyj/kirbyj_sydu.htm at 25 April 2007
Kirby, Hon. Justice Michael,‘The Judiciary in Federation Centenary Year: Good News, Bad News, No News’, paper presented at the Australian Institute of Judicial Administration, Eleventh Australian Institute of Judicial Administration Oration, Sydney, 22 June 2001
Kirby, Hon. Justice Michael,‘Media and Courts: the Dilemma’, speech delivered at the Southern Cross University Graduation Ceremony, 27 April 2002
Kirby, Hon. Justice Michael,‘Take Heart: International Law Comes, Ever Comes’, paper presented at the Conference on International Law, The Challenge of Conflict, Adelaide, 27 February 2004
Kirby, Hon. Justice Michael,‘Law and Justice in Australia: Room for Improvement’, speech delivered at the Queensland University of Technology Law Students’ Society, Brisbane, 3 September 2004
Law Book Company, Laws of Australia (1998), vol. 10 [10.11] ‘Administration of Law and Justice’, ‘Ch 2 Contempt’ [4] 8–11
Law Reform Commission of Canada, Public and Media Access to the Criminal Process, Working Paper 56 (1987), p. 37
Lawlink New South Wales, Media Release: Judges and Laptops (1999), www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/practice_notes/nswsc_pc.nsf/6a64691105a54031ca256880000c25d7/7a0c41c055e586e7ca256885000b407b?OpenDocument at 25 April 2007
Lobez, Susanna, Guidelines for the Occasional Audio Recording of Cases for Radio Documentary Purposes (25 November 1996)
Lord Chancellor's Department, Resolving and Avoiding Disputes in the Information Age, Department for Constitutional Affairs (1998), www.dca.gov.UK/consult/itstrat/civindex.htm at 25 April 2007
Manitoba Courts, Court Policies/Practices affecting Media Coverage, www.manitobacourts.mb.ca/media.html#policies at 25 April 2007
Memory Hole, Break Canada's Pickton Trial News Blackout (2002), www.thememoryhole.org/crime/pickton-blackout.htm at 25 April 2007
Martin, Hon. Wayne, ‘Access to Justice: the Media, the Courts and the Public Record’, address to Australian Press Council Public Meeting, Perth, 22 March 2007, www.supremecourt.wa.gov.au/publications/pdf/Australian_Press_Council_220307.pdf at 14 April 2007
Miles, J. G., QC, ‘Cameras in the Courtroom: Will Televising Trials Educate the Public or Create Injustice? Commentary on a Paper by Selene Mize’, paper presented at the New Zealand Law Conference, Dunedin, 9–13 April 1996; (1996) 2 New Zealand Law Conference Papers 178
Ministers Stick by Supreme Court, British Broadcasting Corporation News (2004), http://news.co./2/hi/news/politics/3545959.stm at 25 April 2007
Ministry of Justice New Zealand, In-Court Media Coverage Guidelines (2003), www.courts.govt.nz/media/ at 25 April 2007
Ministry of Justice New Zealand,New Zealand Guidelines for Media Coverage of Court Proceedings (2004), www.courts.govt.nz/media/guidelines.html at 25 April 2007
Ministry of Justice New Zealand,Supreme Court Media Guidelines (2004), www.courtsofnz.nz/business/documents/SupremeCourt.pdf at 25 April 2007
Moore, Simon, ‘Commentary on Selene Mize's Paper on Cameras in the Courtroom’, paper presented at the 1996 New Zealand Law Conference, Dunedin, 9–13 April 1996
Murray, Paul, Electronic Media Coverage of Courts and the Role of Counsel: a Survey of the Possible Impacts (unpublished LLB Honours dissertation, University of Auckland, January 2003)
National Center for Public Policy Research, ‘The Public has a Right to Know: It's Time to Allow Cameras in Federal Courts’, Press Release, 5 May 1997, www.nationalcenter.org/Cameras597.html at 25 April 2007
National Center for State Courts, How the Public Views the State Courts: a National Survey (1999), www.ncsconline.org/WC/Publications/Res_AmtPTC_PublicViewCrtsPub.pdf at 25 April 2007
National Center for State Courts,Summary of TV Cameras in the State Courts (2002), www.ncsconline.org/WC/Publications/KIS_CameraPub.pdf at 25 April 2007
National Center for State Courts,Knowledge and Information Services, www.ncsconline.org/D_KIS/index.html at 25 April 2007
New Hampshire Supreme Court, Petition of WMUR Channel 9 (13 December 2002), www.courts.state.nh.us/supreme/opinions/2002/0212/wmur156.htm at 25 April 2007
New South Wales Land and Environment Court, Ecourt, https://ecourt.lec.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/eCourt/home.do at 25 April 2007
New York State Defenders’ Association, Cameras in the Courts (2005), www.nysda.org/Hot_Topics/Cameras_in_the_Courts/cameras_in_the_courts.html at 25 April 2007
New York State Unified Court System, Rules of the Chief Administrative Judge (2004), www.courts.state.ny.us/rules/chiefadmin/131.shtml at 25 April 2007
New York State Unified Court System,Rules of the Chief Justice (2004), www.courts.state.ny.us/rules/chiefjudge/29.shtml at 25 April 2007
Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, Pilot Project: Cameras in the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal Rules and Guidelines (1995–6)
Nova Scotia Courts, Media Guide (2003), www.courts.ns.ca/media_access/media.htm at 25 April 2007
Osborn, Elizabeth and Waters, Craig, ‘Courts in the Classroom’, paper presented at the Court Technology Conference in Kansas City, 28–30 October 2003, www.ncsonline.org/D_Tech/ctc/showarticle.asp7.id=61 at 25 April 2007
OZIRIS Productions and SBS Independent, DHUWAY: an Australian Diaspora and Homecoming (1997), www.astarte.com.au/html/australian_history.html dhuway at 25 April 2007
Penlington, Hon. Justice, ‘Television in the Courts: a Personal View’, paper presented at Canadian Judges Conference, 25 August 1998
Provincial Court of British Columbia, Media Access Policy (2001), www.provincialcourt.bc.ca/newsandreferences/mediaaccesspolicy.html at 25 April 2007
Provincial Court of British Columbia,Media Access Policy (2004), www.provincialcourt.bc.ca/downloads/pdf/MediaPolicyApril2004.pdf at 25 April 2007
Public Broadcasting Service, ‘William Rehnquist Interview with Charlie Rose’, KSPS, 18 February 2001, Episode 9635
Puplick, Chris, NSW Privacy Commissioner, ‘Open Justice: Cui Bono?’, address to the Third Australian Institute of Judicial Administration Technology for Justice Conference, 22 October 2002
Radio National, Law Report How Courts Interact with the Media (10 November 1998), www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/8.30/lawrpt/lstories/lr981110.htm at 25 April 2007
Radio-Television News Directors’ Association and Foundation, News Releases: Iowa News Director Testifies September 6 at the Senate Hearing on Cameras in the Courtroom (7 September 2000), www.rtnda.org/news/2000/indtt.shtml at 25 April 2007
Radio-Television News Directors’ Association and Foundation,Cameras in the Court: a State-by-State Guide (2003), www.rtnda.org/foi/scc.shtml at 25 April 2007
Richardson, Sir Ivor, ‘The Courts and the Public’, Australian Institute of Judicial Administration's Sixth Annual Oration in Judicial Administration, Metcalfe Auditorium, Sydney, 25 November 1994
Sackville, Justice Ronald, ‘Access to Justice: the Way Forward’, keynote address at Australian Institute of Judicial Administration Annual Conference, Brisbane, 13 July 2002
Sinclair, Rt Hon. Ian, Constitutional Convention: Transcript of Proceedings (13 February 1998), www.aph.gov.au/hansard/conv/con1302.pdf at 25 April 2007
South Australian Courts Administration Authority, www.courts.sa.gov.au/ at 25 April 2007
South Carolina Judicial Department, Appellate Court Rules, www.judicial.state.sc.us/courtReg/listAPPRules.cfm at 25 April 2007
Special Broadcasting Service, The Trial, (19 September 1998)
Spigelman, Hon. A. C., ‘Reasons for Judgement and the Rule of Law’, paper presented at the National Judicial College, Beijing, 10 November 2003, www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lawlink/supreme_court/11_sc.nsf/pages/SCO_speech_spigelman_101103 at 25 April 2007
Spigelman, Hon. A. C.,‘Open Justice and the Internet’, address at The Law via the Internet 2003 Conference, Sydney, 28 November 2003
Stephen, Rt Hon. Sir Ninian, ‘Address by the Rt Hon Sir Ninian Stephen at the President's Luncheon’, paper presented at the President's Luncheon, 19 August 1998
Stephens, Mark, Broadcasting Courts Seminar: Sceptic No More, an Interview with Mark Stephens by Marcel Berlin, Department for Constitutional Affairs (2005), www.dca.gov.uk/consult/courts/speeches/stephens.htm at 25 April 2007
Stepniak, Daniel, ‘Public Scrutiny, Social Justice and Opposition to the Televising of Court Proceedings’, paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australasian Law Teachers Association, Hobart, October 1994; (1995) 1(3) Proceedings of the 49th Annual Conference of the Australasian Law Teachers Association 1176
Stepniak, Daniel,‘Cameras in Courts: a Case for Extending the US Debate Beyond Constitutional Rights’, paper presented at the Law and Society Association and Research Committee on Sociology of Law, International Meeting on Law and Society, Budapest, 4 July 2001
Stepniak, Daniel,‘The Complementary/Adversarial Roles of Courts and the Media in Audio-Visual Court Reporting: an Australian Perspective’, paper presented at the International Communication Association Conference, Seoul, 15–19 July 2002
Stepniak, Daniel,Electronic Media Coverage of Court Proceedings: Australian Experiences in the Light of Overseas Developments (PhD thesis, University of Melbourne, 2005)
Stepniak, Daniel,‘Overseas Themes and Lessons’, paper presented via video link to the Department for Constitutional Affairs Broadcasting Courts Seminar, London, 10 January 2005, www.dca.gov.uk/consult/courts/speeches/stepniak.htm at 25 April 2007
Straw, Jack, ‘Building a Human Rights Culture’, address to Civil Service College Seminar, 9 December 1999, www.dca.gov.UK/hract/cscspe.htm at 25 April 2007
Supreme Court of British Columbia, Policy on Television in the Courtroom, (2001) (adopted on 9 March 2001), www.courts.gov.bc.ca/sc/TV/TV%20in%20the%20Courtroom.html at 25 April 2007
Supreme Court of British Columbia,Revised Draft Guidelines for Television Coverage of Court Proceedings (2003), www.courts.gov.bc.ca/Sc/TV/Draft%20Guidelines.html at 25 April 2007
Supreme Court of Canada, Frequently Asked Questions (2004), www.scc-csc.gc.ca/faq/faq/index_e.asp at 25 April 2007
Supreme Court of Tasmania, Sentences of the Supreme Court of Tasmania (2003), www.supremecourt.tas.gov.au/decisions/sentences at 25 April 2007
Supreme Court of Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts, ‘Supreme Court Adopts Rule Governing Courtroom Cameras’, News Release, 30 December 1996
Supreme Court of the United States, Argument Transcripts, www.supremecourtus.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts.html at 25 April 2007
Supreme Court of the United States,Opinion, www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/opinions.html at 25 April 2007
Supreme Court of Western Australia, Button v. The Queen, Court of Criminal Appeal (Court of Criminal Appeal (Australian State Court)/112), Media Statements (2002), www.supremecourt.wa.gov.au/content/news/media/2002/media26.aspx at 25 April 2007
Supreme Court of Western Australia,Marquet v. Attorney-General (WA) and anor, Media Statements (2002), www.supremecourt.wa.gov.au/content/news/media/2002/media30.aspx at 25 April 2007
Supreme Court of Western Australia,Farewell Sitting as the WA Supreme Court Judge Joins the UN War Crimes Tribunal Media Statements (2003), www.supremecourt.wa.gov.au/content/news/media/index.htm at 25 April 2007
Supreme Court of Western Australia,Transcript of Ceremonial Sitting Held to Mark Centenary of Supreme Court Building (2003)
Sutherland, Tony, ‘The Internet and Beyond: a New Order for Justice?’, paper presented at the Australian Institute of Judicial Administration Technology for Justice Conference, Melbourne, 9 October 2000
Tasmanian Supreme Courts, www.supremecourt.tas.gov.au/home at 25 April 2007
Taylor, Lord, ‘Justice in the Media Age’, paper presented at the Commonwealth Judges’ and Magistrates’ Association Hertfordshire Symposium, Hertfordshire, 15 April 1995
Thaler, Paul, Director of Journalism and Media, Mercy College, New York, quoted in Robert Schmidt, ‘What's Next for Cameras’, Legal Times, 9 June 1997
Thaler, Paul,The Age (Melb), Justice being seen to be done, www.theage.com.au/news/editorial/justice-being-seen-to-be-done/2007/08/27/11880670D29593.html
Tilgham, Andrew, Bar Calls for Return of Cameras in Court, The Fund for Modern Courts (1 April 2001), www.moderncourts.org/News/Cameras/tu4101cic.html at 25 April 2007
Tipping, Hon. Justice A., ‘Television in Court’, paper presented at the 1996 New Zealand Bar Association Conference, 1996
Trout, Chief Justice Linda Copple, In re: Adoption of Idaho Administrative Rule, Order Adopting Rule 46 (2000), www.isc.idaho.gov/camera46.htm at 25 April 2007
Trout, Chief Justice Linda Copple,In re: Idaho Court Administrative Rule 45, Order Amending Rule (2000), www.isc.idaho.gov/camera2k.htm at 25 April 2007
TVW, Washington State's Public Affairs Network: Audio and Video, www.tvw.org/ at 25 April 2007
Vancouver Independent Media Centre, Metalclad v. United Mexican States NAFTA Appeal, Hour 1 (2001), http://vancouver.indymedia.org/news/2001/02/645.php at 25 June 2004
Wall, Barbara Wartelle, Cameras Allowed at all Open Court Proceedings, New Hampshire Court Rules, Gannett (2003), www.gannett.com/go/newswatch/2003/january/nw0117-11.htm at 25 April 2007
Wallace, Anne, ‘Technology and the Judiciary: the Use of Technology in the Criminal Trial Process’, paper presented at the Fourth Outlook Symposium on Crime in Australia, New Crimes or Responses, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, 21–22 June 2001, www.aic.gov.au/conferences/outlook4/Wallace.pdf at 25 April 2007
Waters, Craig, ‘Netcasting Court Arguments’, paper presented at Seventh National Court Technology Conference, National Center for State Courts, Florida, August 2001
Western Australia Supreme Court, District Court, Family Court, Children's Court and Magistrates’ Court, Guidelines for the Media (1996)
WFSU-TV and Florida Supreme Court, Gavel to Gavel: the Florida Supreme Court Arguments online, http://wfsu.org/gavel2gavel at 25 April 2007
Wood, Hon. James, ‘Royal Commission into the New South Wales Police Service: Use of Technology’, paper presented at the Australian Lawyers’ Conference, Aspen, 5 January 1998