Abbagnaro, L. A., Bauer, B. B., and Torick, E. L. 1975. Measurements of diffraction and interaural delay of a progressive sound wave caused by the human head II. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 58, 693–700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Adrian, E. D. 1931. The microphone action of the cochlea: An interpretation of Wever and Bray's experiments. Journal of Physiology, 71, 28–29.Google Scholar

American National Standards Institute, 1969 (Reaffirmed, 1986). Methods for the Calculation of the Articulation Index, S3.5. New York: American National Standards Institute.Google Scholar

American National Standards Institute, 1976 (Reaffirmed, 1999). Acoustical Terminology, S1.1. New York: American National Standards Institute.Google Scholar

American National Standards Institute, 1997 (Reaffirmed, 2007). Methods for Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index, S3.5. New York: American National Standards Institute.Google Scholar

Amster, H. 1964. Semantic satiation and generation: Learning? Adaptation?Psychological Bulletin, 62, 273–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ashmore, J. F. 1987. A fast motile response in guinea-pig outer hair cells: The cellular basis of the cochlear amplifier. Journal of Physiology, 388, 323–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ayres, T., Aeschbach, S., and Walker, E. L. 1980. Psychoacoustic and experimental determinants of tonal consonance. Journal of Auditory Research, 20, 31–42.Google Scholar

Bachem, A. 1948. Chroma fixation at the ends of the musical frequency scale. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 20, 704–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barsz, K. 1988. Auditory pattern perception: The effect of tonal frequency range on the perception of temporal order. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 293–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bartlett, F. C., and Mark, H. 1922–1923. A note on local fatigue in the auditory system. British Journal of Psychology, 13, 215–218.Google Scholar

Bashford, J. A. Jr., Brubaker, B. S., and Warren, R. M. 1993. Cross-modal enhancement of periodicity detection for very long period recycling frozen noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 2315 (Abstract).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bashford, J. A. Jr., Myers, M. D., Brubaker, B. S., and Warren, R. M. 1988. Illusory continuity of interrupted speech: Speech rate determines durational limits. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 1635–1638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bashford, J. A. Jr., Riener, K. R., and Warren, R. M. 1992. Increasing the intelligibility of speech through multiple phonemic restorations. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 211–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bashford, J. A. Jr., and Warren, R. M. 1987a. Effects of spectral alternation on the intelligibility of words and sentences. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 431–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bashford, J. A. Jr., and Warren, R. M. 1987b. Multiple phonemic restorations follow the rules for auditory induction. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bashford, J. A. Jr., and Warren, R. M. 1990. The pitch of odd-harmonic tones: Evidence of temporal analysis in the dominance region. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, S48 (Abstract).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bashford, J. A. Jr., Warren, R. M., and Brown, C. A. 1996. Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong “bottom-up” cues for phonemic restoration. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 342–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bashford, J. A. Jr., Warren, R. M., and Lenz, P. W. 2006. Polling the effective neighborhoods of spoken words with the Verbal Transformation Effect. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, EL55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Batteau, D. W. 1967. The role of the pinna in human localization. In Proceedings of the Royal Society (London), Series B, 168, 158–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Batteau, D. W. 1968. Listening with the naked ear. In Neuropsychology of Spatially Oriented Behavior, Freedman, S. J. (ed.). Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press, 109–133.Google Scholar

Békésy, G. 1938. Ueber die Entstehung der Entfernungsempfindung beim Hören, Akustische Zeitung, 3, 21–31.Google Scholar

Békésy, G. 1959. Similarities between hearing and skin sensation. Psychological Review, 66, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Békésy, G. 1960. Experiments in Hearing. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Belin, P., Zatorre, R. J., Hoge, R., Pike, B., and Evans, A. C. 1999. Event-related fMRI of the auditory cortex. NeuroImage, 10, 417–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bergman, M. 1957. Binaural hearing. Archives of Otolaryngology, 66, 572–578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berkeley, G. 1948. An essay towards a new theory of vision, Section 143. In The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne, vol. 1, Luce, A. A. and Jessop, T. E. (eds.). London: Thom. Nelson & Sons (First published 1709, text from the 1732 revised edition).Google Scholar

Bertelson, P., and de Gelder, B. 2004. The psychology of multimodal perception. In Cross Modal Space and Cross Modal Attention, Spence, C. and Driver, J. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 141–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertelson, P., and Radeau, M. 1981. Cross-modal bias and perceptual fusion with auditory-visual spatial discordance. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 578–584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bezold, W. 1890. Urteilstauschungen nach Beseitigung einseitiger Harthörigkeit. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 1, 486–487.Google Scholar

Bilger, R. C., Matthies, M. L., Hammel, D. R., and Demorest, M. E. 1990. Genetic implications of gender-differences in the prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emission. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 418–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bilsen, F. A. 1970. Repetition pitch: Its implication for hearing theory and room acoustics. In Frequency Analysis and Periodicity Detection in Hearing, Plomp, R. and Smoorenburg, G. F. (eds.). Leiden: Sijthoff, 291–302.Google Scholar

Bilsen, F. A. 1977. Pitch of noise signals: Evidence for a “central spectrum.”Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 150–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bilsen, F. A., and Goldstein, J. L. 1974. Pitch of dichotically delayed noise and its possible spectral basis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55, 292–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bilsen, F. A., and Ritsma, R. J. 1969–1970. Repetition pitch and its implication for hearing theory. Acustica, 22, 63–73.Google Scholar

Bilsen, F. A., and Wieman, J. L. 1980. Atonal periodicity sensation for comb filtered noise signals. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium in Hearing. Delft: Delft University Press, 379–383.Google Scholar

Blauert, J. 1969–1970. Sound localization in the median plane. Acustica, 22, 205–213.Google Scholar

Blauert, J. 1997. Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bloch, E. 1893. Das binaurale Hören. Zeitschrift für Ohrenheilkunde, 24, 25–85.Google Scholar

Blodgett, H. C., Wilbanks, W. A., and Jeffress, L. A. 1956. Effects of large interaural differences upon the judgment of sidedness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 28, 639–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Boer, E. 1956. On the “Residue” in Hearing. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.

de Boer, E. 1976. On the “residue” and auditory pitch perception. In Handbook of Sensory Physiology, vol. V. Auditory system, Part 3: Clinical and Special Topics, Keidel, W. D. and Neff, W. D. (eds.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 479–583.Google Scholar

Bond, Z. S. 1976. On the specification of input units in speech perception. Brain and Language, 3, 72–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Book, W. F. 1925. The Psychology of Skill with Special Reference to its Acquisition in Typewriting. New York: Gregg.Google Scholar

Borden, G. J. 1979. An interpretation of research on feedback interruption. Brain and Language, 7, 307–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boring, E. G. 1942. Sensation and Perception in the History of Experimental Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar

Brady, S. A., and Shankweiler, D. P. (eds.). 1991. Phonological Processes in Literacy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Braun, M. 1994. Tuned hair cells for hearing, but tuned basilar membrane for overload protection: Evidence from dolphins, bats, and desert rodents. Hearing Research, 78, 98–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bregman, A. S. 1990. Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bregman, A. S., and Campbell, J. 1971. Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 244–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Broadbent, D. E., and Ladefoged, P. 1959. Auditory perception of temporal order. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 31, 1539–1540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brookshire, R. H. 1972. Visual and auditory sequencing by aphasic subjects. Journal of Communication Disorders, 5, 259–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Browman, C. P. 1980. Perceptual processing: Evidence from slips of the ear. In Errors in Linguistic Performance: Slips of the Tongue, Ear, Pen, and Hand, Fromkin, V. A. (ed.). New York: Academic Press, 213–230.Google Scholar

Brown, E. L., and Deffenbacher, K. 1979. Perception and the Senses. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brownell, W. E., Bader, C. R., Bertrand, D., and Ribaupierre, Y. 1985. Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells. Science, 227, 194–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bryan, W. L., and Harter, N. 1897. Studies in the physiology and psychology of the telegraphic language. Psychological Review, 4, 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bryan, W. L., and Harter, N. 1899. Studies on the telegraphic language: The acquisition of a hierarchy of habits. Psychological Review, 6, 345–375.Google Scholar

Bukofzer, M. F. 1947. Music in the Baroque Era. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Burns, E. M., and Viemeister, N. F. 1976. Nonspectral pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60, 863–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, R. A. 1969. Monaural and binaural localization of noise bursts vertically in the median sagittal plane. Journal of Auditory Research, 3, 230–235.Google Scholar

Butler, R. A., Levy, E. T., and Neff, W. D. 1980. Apparent distance of sounds recorded in echoic and anechoic chambers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 745–750.Google ScholarPubMed

Butler, R. A., and Naunton, R. F. 1962. Some effects of unilateral auditory masking upon the localization of sound in space. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 34, 1100–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, R. A., and Naunton, R. F. 1964. Role of stimulus frequency and duration in the phenomenon of localization shifts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 36, 917–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buus, S. 1997. Auditory masking. In Encyclopedia of Acoustics, vol. 3, Crocker, M. J. (ed.). New York: Wiley, 1427–1445.Google Scholar

Carmon, A., and Nachshon, I. 1971. Effect of unilateral brain damage on perception of temporal order. Cortex, 7, 410–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cathcart, E. P., and Dawson, S. 1927–1928. Persistence: A characteristic of remembering. British Journal of Psychology, 18, 262–275.Google Scholar

Cathcart, E. P., and Dawson, S. 1928–1929. Persistence (2). British Journal of Psychology, 19, 343–356.Google Scholar

Caton, R. 1875. The electric currents of the brain. British Medical Journal, 2, 278.Google Scholar

Celce-Murcia, M. 1980. On Meringer's corpus of “slips of the ear.” In Errors in Linguistic Performances: Slips of the Tongue, Ear, Pen, and Hand, Fromkin, V. A. (ed.). New York: Academic Press, 199–211.Google Scholar

Celesia, G. G. 1976. Organization of auditory cortical areas in man. Brain, 99, 403–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chalikia, M. H., and Warren, R. M. 1991. Phonemic transformations: Mapping the illusory organization of steady-state vowel sequences. Language and Speech, 34, 109–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chalikia, M. H., and Warren, R. M. 1994. Spectral fissioning in phonemic transformations. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 218–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chatterjee, M., and Zwislocki, J. J. 1997. Cochlear mechanisms of frequency and intensity coding. I. The place code for pitch. Hearing Research, 111, 65–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cherry, C. 1953. Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cherry, C., and Wiley, R. 1967. Speech communications in very noisy environments. Nature, 214, 1164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chistovich, L. A. 1962. Temporal course of speech sound perception. In Proceedings of the 4th International Commission on Acoustics, (Copenhagen), Article H 18.

Chocholle, R., and Legouix, J. P. 1957a. On the inadequacy of the method of beats as a measure of aural harmonics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 749–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chocholle, R., and Legouix, J. P. 1957b. About the sensation of beats between two tones whose frequencies are nearly in a simple ratio. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N., and Halle, M. 1968. The Sound Patterns of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Christman, R. J. 1954. Shifts in pitch as a function of prolonged stimulation with pure tones. American Journal of Psychology, 67, 484–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ciocca, V., and Bregman, A. S., 1987. Perceived continuity of gliding and steady-state tones through interrupting noise. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 476–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Colavita, F. B., Szeligo, F. V., and Zimmer, S. D. 1974. Temporal pattern discrimination in cats with insular-temporal lesions. Brain Research, 79, 153–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cole, R. A., Rudnicky, A. I., Zue, V. W., and Reddy, D. R. 1980. Speech as patterns on paper. In Perception and Production of Fluent Speech, Cole, R. A. (ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 3–50.Google Scholar

Cole, R. A., and Scott, B. 1973. Perception of temporal order in speech: The role of vowel transitions. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 27, 441–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cole, R. A., and Scott, B. 1974. The phantom in the phoneme: Invariant cues for stop consonants. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleman, P. D. 1963. An analysis of cues to auditory depth perception in free space. Psychological Bulletin, 60, 302–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Collet, L., Kemp, D. T., Veuillet, E., Duclaux, R., Moulin, A., and Morgon, A. 1990. Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects. Hearing Research, 43, 251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connine, C. M., and Titone, D. 1996. Phoneme monitoring. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 635–645.Google Scholar

Cooper, N. P. 1999. An improved heterodyne laser interferometer for use in studies of cochlear mechanics. Journal of the Neuroscience Methods, 88, 93–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cooper, N. P., and Rhode, W. S. 1993. Nonlinear mechanics at the base and apex of the mammalian cochlea; in vivo observations using a displacement-sensitive laser interferometer. In Biophysics of Hair Cell Sensory Systems, Duifhuis, H., Horst, J. W., Dijk, P., and Netten, S. M. (eds.). Singapore: World Scientific, 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, W. E. 1974. Contingent feature analysis in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 201–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, W. E. 1979. Speech Perception and Production: Studies in Selective Adaptation. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Cowan, N., Lichty, W., and Grove, T. R. 1990. Properties of memory for unattended spoken syllables. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 258–269.Google ScholarPubMed

Cramer, E. M., and Huggins, W. H. 1958. Creation of pitch through binaural interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30, 413–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crompton, A. 1982. Syllables and segments in speech production. In Slips of the Tongue and Language Production, Cutler, A. (ed.). Berlin: Mouton, 109–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cullinan, W. L., Erdos, E., Schaefer, R., and Tekieli, M. E. 1977. Perception of temporal order of vowels and consonant-vowel syllables. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 20, 742–751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cutting, J. E. 1973. Levels of Processing in Phonological Fusion. Doctoral dissertation, Yale University (see p. 7).

Dallos, P. 1973. The Auditory Periphery: Biophysics and Physiology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Dallos, P. 1978. Biophysics of the cochlea. In Handbook of Perception, vol. 4, Carterette, E. C. and Freedman, M. P. (eds.). New York: Academic Press, 125–162.Google Scholar

Dallos, P. 1981. Cochlear physiology. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 153–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dancer, A. 1992. Experimental look at cochlear mechanics. Audiology, 31, 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daneman, M., and Merikle, P. M. 1996. Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 422–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dannenbring, G. L. 1976. Perceived auditory continuity with alternately rising and falling frequency transitions. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 30, 99–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

David, E. E., Guttman, N., and Bergeijk, W. A. 1958. On the mechanism of binaural fusion. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30, 801–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, H. 1961. Some principles of sensory receptor action. Physiological Review, 41, 391–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davis, H. 1965. A model for transducer action in the cochlea. In Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology, 30, 181–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davis, H. 1968. Discussion of Batteau's contribution. In Hearing Mechanisms in Vertebrates, CIBA Foundation Symposium, Reuck, A. V. S. and Knight, J. (eds.). Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 241–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, H., Benson, R. W., Covell, W. P., Fernandez, C., Goldstein, R., Katsuki, Y., Legouix, J.-P., McAuliffe, D. R., and Tasaki, I. 1953. Acoustic trauma in the guinea pig. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 1180–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, H., Fernandez, C., and McAuliffe, D. R. 1950. The excitatory process in the cochlea. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 36, 580–587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Deinse, J. B. van 1981. Registers. Folia Phoniatrica, 33, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DelCastillo, D. M., and Gumenik, W. E. 1972. Sequential memory for familiar and unfamiliar forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 95, 90–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deutsch, D. 1974. An auditory illusion. Nature, 251, 307–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deutsch, D. 1975. Two-channel listening to musical scales. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 57, 1156–1160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Deutsch, D. 1981. The octave illusion and auditory perceptual integration. In Hearing Research and Theory, vol. 1, Tobias, J. V. and Schubert, E. D. (eds.). New York: Academic Press, 99–142.Google Scholar

Deutsch, D., and Roll, P. L. 1976. Separate “what” and “where” decision mechanisms in processing a dichotic tonal sequence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 23–29.Google Scholar

Dewson, J. H. III 1964. Speech sound discrimination by cats. Science, 144, 555–556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dewson, J. H. III 1968. Efferent olivocochlear bundle: Some relationships to stimulus discrimination in noise. Journal of Neurophysiology, 31, 122–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewson, J. H. III, and Cowey, A. 1969. Discrimination of auditory sequences by monkeys. Nature, 222, 695–697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Diehl, R. L. 1981. Feature detectors for speech: A critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dirks, D. D., and Bower, D. 1970. Effect of forward and backward masking on speech intelligibility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 47, 1003–1008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Divenyi, P. L., and Hirsh, I. J. 1974. Identification of temporal order in three-tone sequences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 56, 144–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dodd, B. 1977. The role of vision in the perception of speech. Perception, 6, 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dodd, B. 1980. Interaction of auditory and visual information in speech perception. British Journal of Psychology, 71, 541–549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Don, V. J., and Weld, H. P. 1924. Minor studies from the psychological laboratory of Cornell University. LXX. Lapse of meaning with visual fixation. American Journal of Psychology, 35, 446–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dorman, M. F., Cutting, J. E., and Raphael, L. J. 1975. Perception of temporal order in vowel sequences with and without formant transitions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 104, 121–129.Google ScholarPubMed

Dowling, W. J. 1973. The perception of interleaved melodies. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 322–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durlach, N. I., and Braida, L. D. 1969. Intensity perception. I: Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 46, 372–383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Efron, R. 1963. Temporal perception, aphasia, and déjà vu. Brain, 86, 403–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Efron, R. 1973. Conservation of temporal information by perceptual systems. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 518–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Efron, R., and Yund, E. W. 1976. Ear dominance and intensity independence in the perception of dichotic chords. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, 889–898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Egan, J. P. 1948. The effect of noise in one ear upon the loudness of speech in the other. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 20, 58–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Egan, J. P., and Hake, H. W. 1950. On the masking pattern of a simple auditory stimulus. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 20, 622–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eimas, P. D., and Corbit, J. D. 1973. Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eimas, P. D., and Miller, J. L. 1978. Effects of selective adaptation on the perception of speech and visual patterns: Evidence for feature detectors. In Perception and Experience, Walk, R. D. and Pick, H. L. (eds.). New York: Plenum, 307–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elfner, L. F. 1969. Continuity in alternately sounded tone and noise signals in a free field. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 46, 914–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elfner, L. F. 1971. Continuity in alternately sounded tonal signals in a free field. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 447–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elfner, L. F., and Caskey, W. E. 1965. Continuity effects with alternately sounded noise and tone signals as a function of manner of presentation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 38, 543–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Elfner, L. F., and Homick, J. L. 1966. Some factors affecting the perception of continuity in alternately sounded tone and noise signals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 40, 27–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Elfner, L. F., and Homick, J. L. 1967a. Continuity effects with alternately sounding tones under dichotic presentation. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 34–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elfner, L. F., and Homick, J. L. 1967b. Auditory continuity effects as a function of the duration and temporal location of the interpolated signal. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 42, 576–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elman, J. L. 1979. Perceptual origins of the phoneme boundary effect and selective adaptation to speech: A signal detection analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 65, 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, E. F. 1986. Cochlear nerve fiber temporal discharge patterns, cochlear frequency selectivity and the dominant region for pitch. In Auditory Frequency Selectivity, Moore, B. C. J. and Patterson, R. D. (eds.). New York: Plenum, 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fant, C. G. M. 1962. Descriptive analysis of the acoustic aspects of speech. Logos, 5, 3–17.Google Scholar

Fastl, H. 1975. Pulsation patterns of sinusoids vs. critical band noise. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 95–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fay, W. H. 1966. Temporal Sequence in the Perception of Speech. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Fechner, G. T. 1860. Elemente der Psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.Google Scholar

Feddersen, W. E., Sandel, T. T., Teas, D. C., and Jeffress, L. A. 1957. Localization of high frequency tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 988–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrand, L., Segui, J., and Grainger, J. 1996. Masked priming of word and picture naming: The role of syllabic units. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 708–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrand, L., Segui, J., and Humphreys, G. W. 1997. The syllable's role in word naming. Memory & Cognition, 25, 458–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fettiplace, R., and Crawford, A. C. 1980. The origin of tuning in turtle cochlear hair cells. Hearing Research, 2, 447–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fieandt, K. 1951. Loudness invariance in sound perception. Acta Psychologica Fennica, 1, 9–20.Google Scholar

Flanagan, J. L. 1972. Speech Analysis, Synthesis, and Perception, 2nd edition. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flanagan, J. L., and Guttman, N. 1960a. On the pitch of periodic pulses. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32, 1308–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flanagan, J. L., and Guttman, N. 1960b. Pitch of periodic pulses without fundamental component. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32, 1319–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fletcher, H. 1924. The physical criterion for determining the pitch of a musical tone. Physical Review, 23, 427–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fletcher, H. 1930. A space-time pattern theory of hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1, 311–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fletcher, H. 1940. Auditory patterns. Review of Modern Physics, 12, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fletcher, H. 1953. Speech and Hearing in Communication. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar

Flock, Å., Flock, B., and Murray, E. 1977. Studies on the sensory hairs of receptor cells in the inner ear. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 83, 85–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Flügel, J. C. 1920–1921. On local fatigue in the auditory system. British Journal of Psychology, 11, 105–134.Google Scholar

Foss, D. J. 1969. Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of lexical item difficulty and position upon decision times. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 457–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foss, D. J., and Lynch, R. H., Jr. 1969. Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of surface structure on decision times. Perception & Psychophysics, 5, 145–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foulke, E., and Sticht, T. G. 1969. Review of research on the intelligibility and comprehension of accelerated speech. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 50–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fourcin, A. J. 1965. The pitch of noise with periodic spectral peaks. In Reports of the 5th International Congress on Acoustics (Liège), lA, B42.

Fourcin, A. J. 1970. Central pitch and auditory lateralization. In Frequency Analysis and Periodicity Detection in Hearing, Plomp, R. and Smoorenburg, G. F. (eds.). Leiden: Sijthoff, 319–328.Google Scholar

Fraisse, P. 1963. The Psychology of Time, J. Leith, translator. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Freedman, S. J., and Fisher, H. G. 1968. The role of the pinna in auditory localization. In Neuropsychology of Spatially Oriented Behavior, Freedman, S. J. (ed.). Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press, 135–152.Google Scholar

Fromkin, V. A. 1971. The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 7, 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fromkin, V. A. 1973. Speech Errors as Linguistic Evidence. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Fromkin, V. A. 1980. Introduction. In Errors in Linguistic Performance: Slips of the Tongue, Ear, Pen, and Hand, Fromkin, V. A. (ed.). New York: Academic Press, 1–12.Google Scholar

Gacek, R. R. 1972. Neuroanatomy of the auditory system. In Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory, vol. 2, Tobias, J. V. (ed.). New York: Academic Press, 241–262.Google Scholar

Gamble, E. A. McC. 1909. Minor studies from the psychological laboratory of Wellesley College, I. Intensity as a criterion in estimating the distance of sounds. Psychological Review, 16, 416–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ganong, W. F. III 1976. Amplitude contingent selective adaptation to speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, S26 (Abstract).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, M. B. 1968. Historical background of the Haas and/or precedence effect. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 43, 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gardner, M. B. 1969. Distance estimation of 0° or apparent 0° oriented speech signals in anechoic space. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 45, 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, M. B., and Gardner, R. S. 1973. Problem of localization in the median plane: Effect of pinnae cavity occlusion. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 53, 400–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Garner, W. R. 1951. The accuracy of counting repeated short tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 310–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Garner, W. R. 1954. Context effects and the validity of loudness scales. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 218–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Garner, W. R., and Gottwald, R. L. 1967. Some perceptual factors in the learning of sequential patterns of binary events. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 582–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garner, W. R., and Gottwald, R. L. 1968. The perception and learning of temporal patterns. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 97–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Garnes, S., and Bond, Z. S. 1980. A slip of the ear: A snip of the ear? A slip of the year? In Errors in Linguistic Performance: Slips of the Tongue, Ear, Pen, and Hand, Fromkin, V. A. (ed.). New York: Academic Press, 231–239.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. 1937. Adaptation with negative after-effect. Psychological Review, 44, 222–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibson, J. J. 1966. The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Gilkey, R., and Anderson, T. (eds.) 1997. Binaural and Spatial Hearing in Real and Virtual Environments. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Goldinger, S. D., Luce, P. A., and Pisoni, D. B. 1989. Priming lexical neighbors of spoken words: Effects of competition and inhibition. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 501–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, J. L. 1973. An optimum processor theory for the central formation of the pitch of complex tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54, 1496–1516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goldstein, J. L. 1978. Mechanisms of signal analysis and pattern perception in periodicity pitch. Audiology, 17, 421–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goswami, U., and Bryant, P. 1990. Phonological Skills and Learning to Read. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Gray, G. W. 1942. Phonemic microtomy: The minimum duration of perceptible speech sounds. Speech Monographs, 9, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graybiel, A., Kerr, W. A., and Bartley, S. H. 1948. Stimulus thresholds of the semicircular canals as a function of angular acceleration. American Journal of Psychology, 61, 21–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Green, D. M. 1976. An Introduction to Hearing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Green, D. M., and Yost, W. A. 1975. Binaural analysis. In Handbook of Sensory Physiology, vol. 2, Keidel, W. D. and Neff, W. D. (eds.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 461–480.Google Scholar

Green, K. P., and Norrix, L. W. 1997. Acoustic cues to place of articulation and the McGurk effect: The role of release bursts, aspiration, and formant transitions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 646–665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Greenberg, S., and Ainsworth, W. A. (eds.) 2006. Listening to Speech: An Auditory Perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. (Chapters on various topics were assembled to provide “a multi-tier framework” for understanding spoken language.)Google Scholar

Greenwood, D. D. 1961. Critical bandwidth and the frequency coordinates of the basilar membrane. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 33, 1344–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenwood, D. D. 1990. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species – 29 years later. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 2592–2605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Greenwood, D. D. 1997. The mel scale's disqualifying bias and a consistency of pitch-difference equisections in 1956 with equal cochlear distances and equal frequency ratios. Hearing Research, 103, 199–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guttman, N., and Julesz, B. 1963. Lower limit of auditory periodicity analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 35, 610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hafter, E. R., and Carrier, S. C. 1972. Binaural interaction in low-frequency stimuli: The inability to trade time and intensity completely. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 1852–1862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hafter, E. R., Dye, R. H., Jr., and Gilkey, R. H. 1979. Lateralization of tonal signals which have neither onsets nor offsets. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 65, 471–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hafter, E. R., and Jeffress, L. A. 1968. Two-image lateralization of tones and clicks. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44, 563–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hall, D. A., Haggard, M. P., Akeroyd, M. A., Palmer, A. R., Summerfield, Q. A., Elliott, M. R., Gurney, E. M., and Bowtell, R. W. 1999. “Sparse” temporal sampling in auditory fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 7, 213–223.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hall, J. W., Haggard, M. P., and Fernandes, M. A. 1984. Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 50–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hall, L. L., and Blumstein, S. E. 1978. The effect of syllabic stress and syllabic organization on the identification of speech sounds. Perception & Psychophysics, 24, 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halle, M., and Stevens, K. N. 1972. Speech recognition: A model and a program for research. In The Structure of Language, Fodor, J. A. and Katz, J. J. (eds.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 604–612.Google Scholar

Ham, L. B., and Parkinson, J. S. 1932. Loudness and intensity relations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 3, 511–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, G. G. 1960. Binaural interactions of impulsive stimuli and pure tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32, 685–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartmann, W. M. 1983. Localization of sound in rooms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 74, 1380–1391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hartmann, W. M. 1998. Signals, Sound, and Sensation. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Hartmann, W. M., and Wittenberg, A. 1996. On the externalization of sound images. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 3678–3688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Held, R. 1955. Shifts in binaural localization after prolonged exposures to atypical combinations of stimuli. American Journal of Psychology, 68, 526–548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Helmholtz, H. L. F. 1863. Die Lehre von. den Tonempfindunger als physiologischeGrundlage für die Theorie der Musik. Braunschweig: Fr. Viewig und Sohn.Google Scholar

Helmholtz, H. L. F. 1954. On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music. New York: Dover, 1954. (Reprint of 2nd English edition of 1885, Ellis, A. J., translator, based upon the 3rd German edition (1870) and rendered conformal with the 4th German edition (1877)).Google Scholar

Helson, H. 1964. Adaptation Level Theory: An Experimental and Systematic Approach to Behavior. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Henning, G. B. 1974. Detectability of interaural delay in high-frequency complex waveforms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55, 84–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hirano, M., Ohala, J., and Vennard, W. 1969. The function of laryngeal muscles in regulating fundamental frequency and intensity of phonation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 12, 616–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hirsh, I. J. 1948a. The influence of interaural phase on interaural summation and inhibition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 20, 536–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirsh, I. J. 1948b. Binaural summation and interaural inhibition as a function of the level of the masking noise. American Journal of Psychology, 61, 205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirsh, I. J. 1959. Auditory perception of temporal order. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 31, 759–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirsh, I. J., and Sherrick, C. E. 1961. Perceived order in different sense modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 423–432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holcombe, A. O., Kanwisher, N., and Treisman, A. 2001. The midstream order deficit. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 322–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holloway, C. M. 1970. Passing the strongly voiced components of noisy speech. Nature, 226, 178–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Houtgast, T. 1972. Psychophysical evidence for lateral inhibition in hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 1885–1894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Houtgast, T. 1973. Psychophysical experiments on “tuning curves” and “two-tone inhibition.”Acustica, 29, 168–179.Google Scholar

Houtgast, T. 1974a. Lateral Suppression in Hearing. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Free University, Amsterdam.

Houtgast, T. 1974b. Masking patterns and lateral inhibition. In Facts and Models in Hearing, Zwicker, E. and Terhardt, E. (eds.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 258–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Houtgast, T. 1974c. The slopes of masking patterns. In Facts and Models in Hearing, Zwicker, E. and Terhardt, E. (eds.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 269–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Houtgast, T. 1976. Subharmonic pitches of a pure tone at low S/N ratio. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60, 405–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Houtsma, A. J. M., and Goldstein, J. L. 1972. The central origin of the pitch of complex tones: Evidence from musical interval recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 520–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huey, E. B. 1968. The Psychology and Pedagogy of Reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Huggins, A. W. F. 1964. Distortion of the temporal pattern of speech: Interruption and alternation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 36, 1055–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huizing, E. H., and Spoor, A. 1973. An unusual type of tinnitus. Archives of Otolaryngology, 98, 134–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hunt, H. V. 1978. Origins in Acoustics: The Science of Sound from Antiquity to the Age of Newton. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Husain, F. T., Lozito, T. P., Ulloa, A., and Horwitz, B. 2005. Investigating the neural basis of the auditory continuity illusion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1275–1292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jakobson, R., Fant, C. G. M., and Halle, M. 1963. Preliminaries to Speech Analysis: The Distinctive Features and Their Correlates. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Javel, E. 1986. Basic response properties of auditory fibers. In Neurobiology of Hearing: The Cochlea, Altschuler, R. A., Bobbin, R. P., and Hoffman, D. W. (eds.). New York: Raven Press, 213–245.Google Scholar

Johnstone, B. M., and Boyle, A. J. F. 1967. Basilar membrane vibration examined with the Mössbauer technique. Science, 158, 389–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Johnstone, B. M., Taylor, K. J., and Boyle, A. J. 1970. Mechanics of the guinea pig cochlea. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 47, 504–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, M. R. 1978. Auditory patterns: Studies in the perception of structure. In Handbook of Perception, vol. 8, Perceptual Coding, Carterette, E. C. and Friedman, M. P. (eds.). New York: Academic Press, 255–288.Google Scholar

Jongkees, L. B. W., and Veer, R. A. 1957. Directional hearing capacity in hearing disorders. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 48, 465–474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Joos, M. 1948. Acoustic phonetics. Supplement to Language, 24, 1–136 (Language Monograph No. 23).

Jusczyk, P. W., Smith, L. B., and Murphy, C. 1981. The perceptual classification of speech. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaernbach, C. 1992. On the consistency of tapping to repeated noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 788–793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kaernbach, C. 1993. Temporal and spectral basis of the features perceived in repeated noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 91–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kaernbach, C. 2004. The memory of noise. Experimental Psychology, 51, 240–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kashino, M., and Warren, R. M. 1996. Binaural release from temporal induction. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 899–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kemp, D. T. 1978. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64, 1386–1391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kiang, N. Y. -S. 1965. Discharge Patterns of Single Fibers in the Cat's Auditory Nerve (Research Monograph No. 35). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kim, D. O. 1980. Cochlear mechanics: Implications of electrophysiological and acoustical observations. Hearing Research, 2, 297–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kimura, D. 1967. Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex, 3, 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kinney, J. A. S. 1961. Discrimination of auditory and visual patterns. American Journal of Psychology, 74, 529–541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Klatt, D. H. 1979. Speech perception: A model of acoustic-phonetic analysis and lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 7, 279–312.Google Scholar

Kluender, K. R., Diehl, R. L., and Killeen, P. R. 1987. Japanese quail can learn phonetic categories. Science, 237, 1195–1197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Klumpp, R. G., and Eady, H. R. 1956. Some measurements of interaural time-difference thresholds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 28, 859–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kock, W. E. 1950. Binaural localization and masking. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 801–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohllöffel, L. U. E. 1972a. A study of basilar membrane vibrations. I. Fuzziness detection: A new method for the analysis of microvibrations with laser light. Acustica, 27, 49–65.Google Scholar

Kohllöffel, L. U. E. 1972b. A study of basilar membrane vibrations. II. The vibratory amplitude and phase pattern along the basilar membrane (post mortem). Acustica, 27, 66–81.Google Scholar

Kohllöffel, L. U. E. 1972c. A study of basilar membrane vibrations. III. The basilar membrane frequency response curve in the living guinea pig. Acustica, 27, 82–89.Google Scholar

von Kries, J. 1962. Commentary. In Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics, vol. 3, Southall, J. P. C. (ed.). New York: Dover, p. 239. (Translated from the 3rd German edition originally published in 1910.)Google Scholar

Kryter, K. D. 1960. Speech bandwidth compression through spectrum selection. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32, 547–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhl, P., and Miller, J. D. 1974. Discrimination of speech sounds by the chinchilla: /t/ vs. /d/ in CV syllables. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 56, S52 (Abstract).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhl, P., and Miller, J. D. 1978. Speech perception by the chinchilla: Identification functions for synthetic VOT stimuli. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63, 905–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, G. F. 1977. Model for the interaural time differences in the azimuthal plane. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62, 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kunov, H., and Abel, S. 1981. Effects of rise/decay time on the lateralization of interaurally delayed 1-kHz tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, 769–773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Laird, D. A., Taylor, E., and Wille, H. H. 1932. The apparent reduction of loudness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 3, 393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lane, C. E. 1925. Binaural beats. Physical Review, 26, 401–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lane, H. L., Catania, A. C., and Stevens, S. S. 1961. Voice level: Autophonic scale, perceived loudness, and effects of sidetone. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 33, 160–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langmuir, I., Schaefer, V. J., Ferguson, C. V., and Hennelly, E. F. 1944. A study of binaural perception of the direction of a sound source. OSRD Report No. 4079, Publ. No. 31014. (Available from the United States Department of Commerce.)

Lashley, K. S. 1951. The problem of serial order in behavior. In Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior: The Hixon Symposium, Jeffress, L. A. (ed.). New York: Wiley, 112–136.Google Scholar

Lawrence, M. 1965. Middle ear muscle influence on binaural hearing. Archives of Otolaryngology, 82, 478–482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lawrence, M., and Yantis, P. A. 1956. Onset and growth of aural harmonics in the overloaded ear. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 28, 852–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Layton, B. 1975. Differential effects of two nonspeech sounds on phonemic restoration. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 6, 487–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levelt, W. J. M. 1992. Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 42, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Levelt, W. J. M., and Wheeldon, L. 1994. Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary?Cognition, 50, 239–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Levy, E. T., and Butler, R. A. 1978. Stimulus factors which influence the perceived externalization of sound presented through headphones. Journal of Auditory Research, 18, 41–50.Google ScholarPubMed

Lewis, B., and Coles, R. 1980. Sound localization in birds. Trends in NeuroSciences, 3, 102–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., and Studdert-Kennedy, M. 1967. Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Liberman, A. M., Delattre, P., and Cooper, F. S. 1952. The role of selected stimulus-variables in the perception of the unvoiced stop consonants. American Journal of Psychology, 65, 497–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Liberman, A. M., and Mattingly, I. G. 1985. The motor theory of speech perception revisited. Cognition, 21, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F. W., and Carter, B. 1974. Reading and the awareness of linguistic segments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Licklider, J. C. R. 1951. A duplex theory of pitch perception. Experientia, 7, 128–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Licklider, J. C. R. 1954. “Periodicity” pitch and “place” pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 945 (Abstract).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lieberman, P. 1963. Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Language and Speech, 6, 172–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lim, D. J. 1980. Cochlear anatomy related to cochlear micromechanics. A review. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 1686–1695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lindsay, P. H., and Norman, D. A. 1977. Human Information Processing: An Introduction to Psychology, 2nd edition. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Litovsky, R. Y., Colburn, H. S., Yost, W. A., and Guzman, S. J. 1999. The precedence effect. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 1633–1654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Locke, J. 1690. Concerning Human Understanding. London: Holt. Book 2, Chapter 14, Section 13 (Reprinted Oxford: Clarendon, 1894).Google Scholar

Luce, P. A., Goldinger, S. D., Auer, E. T. J., and Vitevitch, M. S. 2000. Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 615–662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Luce, P. A., and Pisoni, D. B. 1998. Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Luce, P. A., Pisoni, D. B., and Goldinger, S. D. 1990. Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words. In Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives, Altmann, G. T. M. (ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

MacNeilage, P. F. 1970. Motor control of serial ordering in speech. Psychological Review, 77, 182–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacNeilage, P. F., and Ladefoged, P. 1976. The production of speech and language. In Handbook of Perception, vol. 7, Carterette, E. C. and Friedman, M. P. (eds.). New York: Academic Press, 75–120.Google Scholar

Mammano, F., and Ashmore, J. F. 1995. A laser interferometer for subnanometer measurements in the cochlea. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 60, 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marks, L. E. 1978. The Unity of the Senses: Interrelations Among the Modalities. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Massaro, D. W. 1987. Speech Perception by Ear and Eye: A Paradigm for Psychological Inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Massaro, D. W., and Cohen, M. M. 1995. Perceiving talking faces. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 104–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matsumoto, M. 1897. Researches on acoustic space. Studies from the Yale Psychological Laboratory, 5, 1–75.Google Scholar

Maxfield, J. P. 1930. Acoustic control of recording for talking motion pictures. Journal of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers, 14, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maxfield, J. P. 1931. Some physical factors affecting the illusion in sound motion pictures. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 3, 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McClelland, J. L. and Elman, J. L. 1986. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McFadden, D., and Pasanen, E. G. 1975. Binaural beats at high frequencies. Science, 190, 394–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McGurk, H., and MacDonald, J. 1976. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746–748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McKenna, T. M., Weinberger, N. M., and Diamond, D. M. 1989. Responses of single auditory cortical neurons to tone sequences. Brain Research, 481, 142–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Meddis, R., and Hewitt, M. J. 1991a. Virtual pitch and phase sensitivity of a computer model of the auditory periphery. I. Pitch identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 2866–2882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meddis, R., and Hewitt, M. J. 1991b. Virtual pitch and phase sensitivity of a computer model of the auditory periphery. II. Phase sensitivity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 2883–2894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meringer, R., and Mayer, C. 1895. Versprechen und Verlesen: Eine psychologische-linguistische Studie. Stuttgart: Göschensche Verlagsbuschhandlung.Google Scholar

Mershon, D. H., and King, L. E. 1975. Intensity and reverberation as factors in the auditory perception of egocentric distance. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 409–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, M. F. 1957. Aural harmonics are fictitious. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Micheyl, C., Carlyon, R. P., Shtyrov, Y., Hauk, O., Dodson, T., and Pullvermüller, F. 2003. The neurophysiological basis of the auditory continuity illusion: A mismatch negativity study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 747–758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Miller, G. A. 1947. Sensitivity to changes in the intensity of white noise and its relation to masking and loudness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 19, 609–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, G. A. 1962. Decision units in the perception of speech. IRE Transactions on Information Theory, 8, 81–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, G. A. 1991. The Science of Words. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A., and Licklider, J. C. R. 1950. The intelligibility of interrupted speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, J. L., and Jusczyk, P. W. 1989. Seeking the neurobiological bases of speech perception. Cognition, 33, 111–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Miller, R. L. 1947. Masking effects of periodically pulsed tones as a function of time and frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 19, 798–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mills, A. W. 1958. On the minimum audible angle. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30, 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mills, A. W. 1972. Auditory localization. In Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory, vol. 2, Tobias, J. V. (ed.). New York: Academic Press, 303–348.Google Scholar

Mohrmann, K. 1939. Lautheitskonstanz im Entfernungswechsel. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 145, 145–199.Google Scholar

Møller, A. 2006. Hearing: Anatomy, Physiology, and Disorders of the Auditory System, 2nd edition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Monroe, M. 1932. Children who Cannot Read. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Moore, B. C. J. 1974. Relation between the critical bandwidth and the frequency-difference limen. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55, 359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Moore, B. C. J. 2003. An introduction to the Psychology of Hearing, 5th edition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Moore, M. W., and Bliss, J. C. 1975. The Optacon reading system. Education of the Visually Handicapped, 7, 15–21.Google Scholar

Moore, T. J., and Mundie, J. R. 1971. Specification of the minimum number of glottal pulses necessary for reliable identification of selected speech sounds. Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory Report, TR-70–104.Google Scholar

Morais, J., Cary, L., Alegria, J., and Bertelson, P. 1979. Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously?Cognition, 7, 323–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morais, J., and Kolinsky, R. 1994. Perception and awareness in phonological processing: The case of the phoneme. Cognition, 50, 287–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Müsch, H., and Buus, S. 2001a. Using statistical decision theory to predict speech intelligibility. I. Model structure. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 2896–2909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müsch, H., and Buus, S. 2001b. Using statistical decision theory to predict speech intelligibility. II. Measurement and prediction of consonant-discrimination performance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 2910–2920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Näätänen, R., and Winkler, I. 1999. The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 826–859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Necker, L. A. 1832. Observations on some remarkable phenomena seen in Switzerland; and on an optical phenomenon which occurs on viewing of a crystal or geometrical solid. Philosophical Magazine (Series 1), 3, 239–337.Google Scholar

Negus, V. E. 1949. The Comparative Anatomy and Physiology of the Larynx. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar

Neisser, U., and Hirst, W. 1974. Effect of practice on the identification of auditory sequences. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 391–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newton, I. 1730. Opticks, or a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections & Colours of Light, 4th edition. London (Reprinted New York: Dover, 1952).Google Scholar

van Noorden, L. P. A. S. 1975. Temporal Coherence in the Perception of Tone Sequences. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology.

Noorden, L. P. A. S. 1977. Minimum differences of level and frequency for perceptual fission of tone sequences ABAB. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 1041–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nordmark, J. O. 1968. Mechanisms of frequency discrimination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44, 1533–1540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Norris, D. 1994. Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., and Cutler, A. 2000. Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 299–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Obusek, C. J., and Warren, R. M. 1973. Relation of the verbal transformation and the phonemic restoration effects. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oertel, D. 1999. The role of timing in the brain stem auditory nuclei of vertebrates. Annual Review of Physiology, 61, 497–519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ohm, G. S. 1843. Ueber die Definition des Tones, nebst daran geknüpfter Theorie der Sirene und ähnlicher tonbildender Vorrichtungen. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 59, 513–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ohm, G. S. 1844. Noch ein Paar Worte über die Definition des Tones. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 62, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Öhman, S. E. G. 1966. Perception of segments of VCCV utterances. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 40, 979–988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Opheim, O., and Flottorp, G. 1955. The aural harmonics in normal and pathological hearing. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 45, 513–531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ortmann, O. 1926. On the melodic relativity of tones. Psychological Monographs, 35 (1, No. 162).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paivio, A. 1971. Imagery and Verbal Processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Paivio, A., and Csapo, K. 1969. Concrete-image and verbal memory codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patterson, J. H., and Green, D. M. 1970. Discrimination of transient signals having identical energy spectra. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 48, 894–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Patterson, R. D. 1969. Noise masking of a change in residue pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 45, 1520–1524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Patterson, R. D., and Wightman, F. L. 1976. Residue pitch as a function of component spacing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, 1450–1459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Peake, W. T., and Ling, A. Jr. 1980. Basilar-membrane motion in the alligator lizard: Its relation to tonotopic organization and frequency selectivity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 1736–1745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Peterson, G. E. 1946. Influence of voice quality. Volta Review, 48, 640–641.Google Scholar

Peterson, G. E., and Barney, H. L. 1952. Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24, 115–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petkov, C. I., O'Connor, K. N., and Sutter, M. I. 2003. Illusory sound perception in Macaque monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 9155–9161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Philipchalk, R., and Rowe, F. J. 1971. Sequential and nonsequential memory for verbal and nonverbal auditory stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91, 341–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pickles, J. O. 1988. An Introduction to the Physiology of Hearing, 2nd edition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Pierce, A. H. 1901. Studies in Auditory and Visual Space Perception. New York: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar

Piston, W. 1947. Counterpoint. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Plack, C. J., Oxenham, A. J., Fay, R., and Popper, A. N. (eds.) 2005. Pitch: Neural Coding and Perception. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Plateau, J. 1872. Sur la mesure des sensations physiques, et sur la loi qui lie l'intensité de ces sensations à l'intensité de la cause excitante. Bulletins de l'Académie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux-Arts de Belgique, 33, 376–388 (Série 2).Google Scholar

Plenge, G. 1974. On the differences between localization and lateralization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 56, 944–951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Plomp, R. 1964. The ear as a frequency analyzer. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 36, 1628–1636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plomp, R. 1966. Experiments on Tone Perception. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Utrecht.

Plomp, R. 1967a. Pitch of complex tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 41, 1526–1533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plomp, R. 1967b. Beats of mistuned consonances. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 42, 462–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plomp, R. 1968. Pitch, timbre, and hearing theory. International Audiology, 7, 322–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plomp, R. 1976. Aspects of Tone Sensation: A Psychophysical Study. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Plomp, R. 1981. Perception of sound signals at low signal-to-noise ratio. In Auditory and Visual Pattern Recognition, Getty, D. J. and Howard, J. H. (eds.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 27–35.Google Scholar

Plomp, R. 2002. The Intelligent Ear. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum (see Chapter 3 for a discussion on sequence perception).

Plomp, R., and Levelt, W. J. M. 1965. Tonal consonance and critical bandwidth. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 38, 548–560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Polanyi, M. 1958. Personal Knowledge. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Polanyi, M. 1968. Logic and psychology. American Psychologist, 23, 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pollack, I. 1952. On the measurement of the loudness of speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24, 323–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Potter, R. K., Kopp, G. A., and Kopp, H. G. 1947. Visible Speech. New York: Van Nostrand (Reprinted New York: Dover, 1966).Google Scholar

Poulton, E. C., and Freeman, P. R. 1966. Unwanted asymmetrical transfer effects with balanced experimental designs. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Powers, G. L., and Wilcox, J. C. 1977. Intelligibility of temporally interrupted speech with and without intervening noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 195–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pravdich-Neminsky, V. V. 1913. Ein Versuch der Registrierung der elektrischen Gehirnerscheinungen (in German). Zentralblatt Physiology, 27, 951–960.Google Scholar

Preusser, D. 1972. The effect of structure and rate on the recognition and description of auditory temporal patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Probst, R., Lonsbury-Martin, B. L., and Martin, G. K. 1991. A review of otoacoustic emissions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 2027–2067.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Puel, J. L. 1995. Chemical synaptic transmission in the cochlea. Progress in Neurobiology, 47, 449–476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pujol, R., Lenoir, M., Ladrech, S., Tribillac, F., and Rebillard, G. 1992. Correlation between the length of the outer hair cells and the frequency coding of the cochlea. In Auditory Physiology and Perception, Cazals, Y., Horner, K., and Demany, L. (eds.). Oxford: Pergamon, 45–52.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, G. L. 1946. The olivary peduncle and other fiber projections of the superior olivary complex. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 84, 141–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rasmussen, G. L. 1953. Further observations of the efferent cochlear bundle. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 99, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rayleigh, Lord 1907. On our perception of sound direction. Philosophical Magazine, 13, 214–232.Google Scholar

Read, C. A., Zhang, Y., Nie, H., and Ding, B. 1986. The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic writing. Cognition, 24, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Reisz, R. R. 1928. Differential sensitivity of the ear for pure tones. Physical Review, 31, 867–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Relkin, E. M., and Ducet, J. R. 1997. Is loudness simply proportional to the auditory nerve spike count?Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 2735–2740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Remez, R. E. 1979. Adaptation of the category boundary between speech and nonspeech: A case against feature detectors. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 38–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Remez, R. E., Rubin, P. E., Berns, S. M., Pardo, J. S., and Lang, J. M. 1994. On the perceptual organization of speech. Psychological Review, 101, 129–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Repp, B. H. 1992. Perceptual restoration of a “missing” speech sound: Auditory induction or illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 14–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rhode, W. S. 1971. Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 1218–1231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rhode, W. S. 1973. An investigation of post-mortem cochlear mechanics using the Mössbauer effect. In Basic Mechanisms in Hearing, Møller, A. R. M. (ed.). New York: Academic Press, 49–67.Google Scholar

Rhode, W. S., and Robles, L. 1974. Evidence from Mössbauer experiments for non-linear vibration in the cochlea. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55, 588–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richardson, L. F., and Ross, J. S. 1930. Loudness and telephone current. Journal of General Psychology, 3, 288–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riesen, A. H. (ed.) 1975. The Developmental Neuropsychology of Sensory Deprivation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Ritsma, R. J. 1962. Existence region of the tonal residue. I. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 34, 1224–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritsma, R. J. 1963. Existence region of the tonal residue. II. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 35, 1241–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritsma, R. J. 1970. Periodicity detection. In Frequency Analysis and Periodicity Detection in Hearing, Plomp, R. and Smoorenburg, G. F. (eds.). Leiden: Sijthoff, 250–266.Google Scholar

Roffler, S. K., and Butler, R. A. 1968. Factors that influence the localization of sound in the vertical plane. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 43, 1255–1259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rose, J. E., Brugge, J. F., Anderson, D. J., and Hind, J. E. 1967. Phase-locked response to low-frequency tones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 30, 769–793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rose, J. E., Hind, J. E., Anderson, D. J., and Brugge, J. F. 1971. Some effects of stimulus intensity on response of auditory nerve fibers in the squirrel monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 34, 685–699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rosen, S. M. 1979. Range and frequency effects in consonant categorization. Journal of Phonetics, 7, 393–402.Google Scholar

Rosen, S. M., Fourcin, A. J., and Moore, B. C. J. 1981. Voice pitch as an aid to lipreading. Nature, 291, 150–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Roth, G. L., Kochhar, R. K., and Hind, J. E. 1980. Interaural time differences: Implications regarding the neurophysiology of sound localization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68, 1643–1651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rowe, E. J., and Cake, L. J. 1977. Retention of order information for sounds and words. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 31, 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rowley, R. R., and Studebaker, G. A. 1969. Monaural loudness-intensity relationships for a 1,000-Hz tone. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 45, 1186–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Royer, F. L., and Garner, W. R. 1970. Perceptual organization of nine-element auditory temporal patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 7, 115–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rozin, P., Poritsky, S., and Sotsky, R. 1971. American children with reading problems can easily learn to read English represented by Chinese characters. Science, 171, 1264–1267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sachs, C. 1953. Rhythm and Tempo. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Sams, M., Hari, R., Rif, J., and Knuutila, J. 1993. The human auditory trace persists about 10s: Neuromagnetic evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences, 5, 363–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuel, A. G. 1987. Lexical uniqueness effects on phonemic restoration. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 36–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandel, T. T., Teas, D. C., Feddersen, W. E., and Jeffress, L. A. 1955. Localization of sound from single and paired sources. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 842–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sasaki, T. 1980. Sound restoration and temporal localization of noise in speech and music sounds. Tohoku Psychologica Folia, 39, 79–88.Google Scholar

Savin, H. B. 1972. What the child knows about speech when he starts to learn to read. In Language by Ear and by Eye, Kavanagh, J. F. and Mattingly, I. G. (eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 319–329.Google Scholar

Savin, H. B., and Bever, T. G. 1970. The nonperceptual reality of the phoneme. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sawusch, J. R., and Nusbaum, H. C. 1979. Contextual effects in vowel perception. l: Anchor-induced contrast effects. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 292–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scharf, B. 1970. Critical bands. In Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory, vol. I, Tobias, J. V. (ed.). New York: Academic Press, 157–202.Google Scholar

Schouten, J. F. 1938. The perception of subjective tones. K Akademie van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam. Afdeeling Natuurkunde (Proceedings), 41, 1086–1093.Google Scholar

Schouten, J. F. 1939. Synthetic sound. Philips Technical Review, 4, 153–180.Google Scholar

Schouten, J. F. 1940a. The residue, a new component in subjective sound analysis. K. Akademie van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam. Afdeeling Natuurkunde (Proceedings), 43, 356–365.Google Scholar

Schouten, J. F. 1940b. The perception of pitch. Philips Technical Review, 5, 286–294.Google Scholar

Schouten, J. F. 1940c. The residue and the mechanism of hearing. K. Akademie van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam. Afdeeling Natuurkunde (Proceedings), 43, 991–999.Google Scholar

Schouten, J. F. 1970. The residue revisited. In Frequency Analysis and Periodicity Detection in Hearing, Plomp, R. and Smoorenburg, G. F. (eds.). Leiden: Sijthoff, 41–58.Google Scholar

Schouten, J. F., Ritsma, R. J., and Cardozo, B. L. 1962. Pitch of the residue. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 34, 1418–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schreiner, C., Gottlob, D., and Mellert, V. 1977. Influences of the pulsation threshold method on psychoacoustical tuning curves. Acustica, 37, 29–36.Google Scholar

Schröger, E. 1996. Interaural time and level differences: Integrated or separated processing?Hearing Research, 96, 191–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schultz, D. P. 1965. Sensory Restriction: Effects on Behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Searle, C. L., Jacobson, J. Z., and Rayment, S. G. 1979. Stop consonant discrimination based on human audition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 65, 799–809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Seebeck, A. 1841. Beobachtungen über einige Bedingungen der Enstehung von. Tönen. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 53, 417–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seebeck, A. 1843. Ueber die Sirene. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 60, 449–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seebeck, A. 1844. Ueber die Definition des Tones. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 63, 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sellick, P. M., Patuzzi, R., and Johnstone, B. M. 1982. Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mössbauer technique. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 72, 131–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Semal, C., and Demany, L. 1990. The upper limit of “musical” pitch. Music Perception, 8, 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Severance, E., and Washburn, M. F. 1907. Minor studies from the psychological laboratory of Vassar College. IV. The loss of associative power in words after long fixation. American Journal of Psychology, 18, 182–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shankweiler, D., and Liberman, I. Y. 1972. Misreading: A search for causes. In Language by Ear and by Eye, Kavanaugh, J. F. and Mattingly, I. G. (eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 293–317.Google Scholar

Shattuck, S. R. 1975. Speech Errors and Sentence Production. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Shaxby, J. H., and Gage, F. H. 1932. Studies in the localisation of sound. Medical Research Council Special Report, Series No. 166, 1–32.Google Scholar

Sherman, G. L. 1971. The Phonemic Restoration Effect: An Insight into the Mechanisms of Speech Perception. Unpublished Master's Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.

Shigenaga, S. 1965. The constancy of loudness and of acoustic distance. Bulletin of the Faculty of Literature, Kyushu University, 9, 289–333.Google Scholar

Shore, S. E., Godfrey, D. A., Helfert, R. H., Altschuler, R. A., and Bledsoe, S. C. Jr. 1992. Connections between the cochlea nuclei in guinea pig. Hearing Research, 62, 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shriberg, E. E. 1992. Perceptual restoration of filtered vowels with added noise. Language and Speech, 35, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shutt, C. E. 1898. Experiments in judging the distance of sound. Kansas University Quarterly, 7A, 1–8.Google Scholar

Siegel, R. J. 1965. A replication of the mel scale of pitch. American Journal of Psychology, 78, 615–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silverman, S. R., and Hirsh, I. J. 1955. Problems related to the use of speech in clinical audiometry. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 64, 1234–1245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Simmons, F. B. 1964. Perceptual theories of middle ear function. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 73, 724–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, H. J., and Studdert-Kennedy, M. 1978. Selective anchoring and adaptation of phonetic and nonphonetic continua. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64, 1338–1357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sinnott, J. M., Beecher, M. D., Moody, D. B., and Stebbins, W. C. 1976. Speech sound discrimination by monkeys and humans. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60, 687–695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Small, A. M. Jr., and Campbell, R. A. 1961. Masking of pulsed tones by bands of noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 33, 1570–1576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar