Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables and figures
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Evaluation design and methodology
- 3 The Effective Bail Scheme in Yorkshire and Humberside
- 4 The operation of the Effective Bail Scheme
- 5 The Effective Bail Scheme's work with defendants
- 6 Interviewees' perspectives on the Effective Bail Scheme
- 7 Interim outcomes of the Effective Bail Scheme
- 8 Conclusions
- References
- Appendix One Figure A1 Process maps of the Effective Bail Scheme
- Appendix Two Commencements on the EBS by area
- Appendix Three EBS caseloads
- Appendix Four EBS accommodation
- Appendix Five Accommodation caseloads
3 - The Effective Bail Scheme in Yorkshire and Humberside
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 September 2022
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables and figures
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Evaluation design and methodology
- 3 The Effective Bail Scheme in Yorkshire and Humberside
- 4 The operation of the Effective Bail Scheme
- 5 The Effective Bail Scheme's work with defendants
- 6 Interviewees' perspectives on the Effective Bail Scheme
- 7 Interim outcomes of the Effective Bail Scheme
- 8 Conclusions
- References
- Appendix One Figure A1 Process maps of the Effective Bail Scheme
- Appendix Two Commencements on the EBS by area
- Appendix Three EBS caseloads
- Appendix Four EBS accommodation
- Appendix Five Accommodation caseloads
Summary
The Effective Bail Scheme (EBS) was a bail support scheme for adults which operated in the Yorkshire and Humberside region between 2006 and 2010. It was originally set up as a pilot in six courts (Bradford, Hull, Leeds, Scarborough, Sheffield and York). The scheme was phased in between November 2006 and February 2007. During 2007 the scheme was expanded to several small courts covering rural areas in the region including Bingley in West Yorkshire. In late 2007, the scheme was expanded again to cover three further courts in North Yorkshire (Harrogate, Skipton and Northallerton (HSN). The courts were selected specifically to test the suitability of operating bail support schemes in urban and rural areas. This chapter describes the governance and staffing structures of the EBS and discusses some of the issues which arose with these aspects of the scheme. Before this, the role of the Bail Information Pathfinder (BIP) is discussed.
The Bail Information Pathfinder
Alongside the EBS, the Yorkshire and Humberside Regional Offender Manager commissioned a pilot bail information scheme funded by the national Pathfinder initiative (Brown et al, 2008). The scheme began in November 2006 and ran alongside the EBS. Although, the BIP was a separate initiative with a different funding source, its role as gatekeeper to the EBS was crucial. It basically assessed defendants’ suitability for the EBS making it impossible to separate the impact of one scheme from the other.
The BIP identified defendants at risk of custodial remands prior to their first court appearance and interviewed them to ascertain information relevant to the remand decision. Where appropriate, information, which was verified where possible, was provided to the court with copies usually also given to the Crown Prosecution Service and defence solicitors. In this respect, the BIP differed from previous bail information schemes in England and Wales where the primary recipients were the CPS and not the court (see Chapter One). The information provided by the BIP included information about defendants’ community ties as well as details of any bail support package and/or available accommodation when appropriate.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Bail Support Schemes for Adults , pp. 29 - 34Publisher: Bristol University PressPrint publication year: 2011