Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T20:28:26.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

24 - The intricacy of structural and ecological adaptations: micromorphology and ecology of some Aspidogastrea

from Part VI - Autecological Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

Klaus Rohde
Affiliation:
University of New England, Australia
Get access

Summary

This chapter aims to show that morphological and ecological adaptations of some animal species are highly intricate, formed by evolutionary processes over many millions of years. Disturbances upsetting the value of such adaptations may lead to the extinction of species that cannot easily be replaced, at least in some habitats. As an example we use two species of Aspidogastrea studied over many years by light and electron microscopy, DNA analyses and autecological approaches including studies of life cycles, effects on hosts, niche selection and population dynamics.

The Aspidogastrea (= Aspidobothrea = Aspidobothria) is a small group of trematodes (flukes) with about 80 species. They represent the sister group of the digeneans. Cladistic analyses using a total evidence approach, i.e., 18S rDNA sequences, morphology, ultrastructure, life-cycle data and hosts, suggest that they separated from the digeneans over 400 million years ago (Littlewood et al., 1999). They parasitize mollusks and vertebrates. Mollusks either serve as intermediate hosts containing the larvae and juveniles, or the entire life cycle can be completed in them. In all known life cycles, vertebrates become infected by eating infected mollusks (snails and/or bivalves). There are four families, and three of them, each with a single genus and one or two species, infect chondrichthyan fishes (sharks, rays and chimaeras); species of the fourth family infect teleost fishes and turtles. The greater number of host families infected suggests that chondrychthyans are the original hosts of aspidogastreans. Whereas digeneans multiply in the mollusk intermediate hosts, aspidogastreans do not: one egg never gives rise to more than one larva.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hengeveld, R., & Walter, G. H. (1999). The two coexisting ecological paradigms. Acta Biotheoretica, 47, 141–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlewood, D. T. J., Rohde, K., Bray, R. A., & Herniou, E. A. (1999). Phylogeny of the Platyhelminthes and the evolution of parasitism. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 68, 257–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, K., & Gibson, D. I. (1970). Ecological studies of some parasites of plaice Pleuronectes platessa L. and flounder Platichthys flesus (L.). In Taylor, A. E. R. and Muller, R. R. (Eds.), Aspects of Fish Parasitology (pp. 1–42). Symposium of the British Society of Parasitology, no. 8.Google Scholar
Rohde, K. (1966). Sense receptors of Multicotyle purvisi Dawes (Trematoda, Aspidobothria). Nature, 211, 820–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K. (1968). Die Entwicklung von Multicotyle purvisi Dawes, 1941 (Trematoda, Aspidogastrea). Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde, 30, 278–280.Google Scholar
Rohde, K. (1970). Nerve sheath in Multicotyle purvisi Dawes. Naturwissenschaften, 57, 502–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rohde, K. (1971a). Untersuchungen an Multicotyle purvisi Dawes, 1941 (Trematoda, Aspidogastrea). I. Entwicklung und Morphologie. Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Anatomie, 88, 138–187.Google Scholar
Rohde, K. (1971b). Untersuchungen an Multicotyle purvisi Dawes, 1941 (Trematoda, Aspidogastrea). III. Licht- und elecktronenmikroskopischer Bau des Nervensystems. Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Anatomie, 88, 320–363.Google Scholar
Rohde, K. (1972). The Aspidogastrea, especially Multicotyle purvisi Dawes, 1941. Advances in Parasitology, 10, 77–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K. (1973). Structure and development of Lobatostoma manteri sp. nov. (Trematoda, Aspidogastrea) from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Parasitology, 66, 63–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rohde, K. (1975). Early development and pathogenesis of Lobatostoma manteri Rohde (Trematoda: Aspidogastrea). International Journal for Parasitology, 5, 597–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K. (1981). Population dynamics of two snail species, Planaxis sulcatus and Cerithium moniliferum, and their trematode species at Heron Island, Great Barrier Reef. Oecologia, 49, 344–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rohde, K. (1990). Ultrastructure of the sense receptors of adult Multicotyle purvisi (Trematoda, Aspidogastrea). Zoologica Scripta, 19, 233–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K. (1994). The minor groups of parasitic Platyhelminthes. Advances in Parasitology, 33, 145–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rohde, K. (2002). Niche restriction and mate finding in vertebrate hosts. In Lewis, E. E., Campbell, J. F. & Sukhdeo, M. V. K. (Eds.), The Behavioral Ecology of Parasites (pp. 171–197). Wallingford: CAB International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K., & Sandland, R. (1973). Host-parasite relations in Lobatostoma manteri Rohde (Trematoda, Aspidogastrea). Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde, 41, 115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K., & Watson, N. (1989). Sense receptors in Lobatostoma manteri (Trematoda, Aspidogastrea). International Journal for Parasitology, 19, 847–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K., & Watson, N. (1990a). Non-ciliate sensory receptors of larval Multicotyle purvisi (Trematoda, Aspidogastrea). Parasitology Research, 76, 585–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K., & Watson, N. (1990b). Uniciliate sensory receptors of larval Multicotyle purvisi (Trematoda, Aspidogastrea). Parasitology Research, 76, 591–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K., & Watson, N. (1990c). Paired multiciliate receptor complexes in larval Multicotyle purvisi (Trematoda, Aspidogastrea). Parasitology Research, 76, 597–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K., & Watson, N. (1991). Ultrastructure of pigmented photoreceptor of larval Multicotyle purvisi (Trematoda, Aspidogastrea). Parasitology Research, 77, 485–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K., & Watson, N. A. (1992). Sense receptors of larval Lobatostoma manteri (Trematoda, Aspidogastrea). International Journal for Parasitology, 22, 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×