Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Foreword by Jan Mycielski
- Preface
- Preface to the Paperback Edition
- Part I Paradoxical Decompositions, or the Nonexistence of Finitely Additive Measures
- Part II Finitely Additive Measures, or the Nonexistence of Paradoxical Decompositions
- Chapter 9 Transition
- Chapter 10 Measures in Groups
- Chapter 11 Applications of Amenability: Marczewski Measures and Exotic Measures
- Chapter 12 Growth Conditions in Groups and Supramenability
- Chapter 13 The Role of the Axiom of Choice
- Appendix A Euclidean Transformation Groups
- Appendix B Jordan Measure
- Appendix C Unsolved Problems
- Addendum to Second Printing
- References
- List of Symbols
- Index
Chapter 10 - Measures in Groups
from Part II - Finitely Additive Measures, or the Nonexistence of Paradoxical Decompositions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Foreword by Jan Mycielski
- Preface
- Preface to the Paperback Edition
- Part I Paradoxical Decompositions, or the Nonexistence of Finitely Additive Measures
- Part II Finitely Additive Measures, or the Nonexistence of Paradoxical Decompositions
- Chapter 9 Transition
- Chapter 10 Measures in Groups
- Chapter 11 Applications of Amenability: Marczewski Measures and Exotic Measures
- Chapter 12 Growth Conditions in Groups and Supramenability
- Chapter 13 The Role of the Axiom of Choice
- Appendix A Euclidean Transformation Groups
- Appendix B Jordan Measure
- Appendix C Unsolved Problems
- Addendum to Second Printing
- References
- List of Symbols
- Index
Summary
In Part I we saw that the main idea in the construction of a paradoxical decomposition of a set was to first get such a decomposition in a group acting on the set, and then transfer it to the set. An almost identical theme pervades the construction of invariant measures on a set X acted upon by a group G. If there is a finitely additive, left-invariant measure defined on all subsets of G, then it can be used to produce a finitely additive, G-invariant measure defined on all subsets of X. Such measures on X yield that X (and certain subsets of X) are not G-paradoxical.
It was von Neumann [246] who realized that such a transference of measures was possible, and he began the job of classifying the groups that bear measures of this sort. In this chapter we first study some properties of the class of groups having measures and show that it is fairly extensive, containing all solvable groups. We then give the important application to the case of isometries acting on the line or plane, obtaining the nonexistence of Banach-Tarski-type paradoxes in these two dimensions.
Definition 10.1. If, for a group G, µ is a finitely additive measure on P(G) such that µ(G) = 1 and µ is left-invariant (µ(gA) = µ(A) for g ∈ G, A ⊆ G), then µ will be called simply a measure on G.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Banach-Tarski Paradox , pp. 146 - 164Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1985