Agamennoni, G., Nieto, J., and Nebot, E. 2011. An outlier-robust Kalman filter. Pages 1551–1558 of: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).Google Scholar

Akashi, H. and Kumamoto, H. 1977. Random sampling approach to state estimation in switching environments. Automatica, 13(4), 429–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alspach, D. L. and Sorenson, H. W. 1972. Nonlinear Bayesian estimation using Gaussian sum approximations. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 17(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrieu, C., De Freitas, N., and Doucet, A. 2002. Rao-Blackwellised particle filtering via data augmentation. In: Dietterich, T. G., Becker, S., and Ghahramani, Z. (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Andrieu, C., Doucet, A., Singh, S., and Tadic, V. 2004. Particle methods for change detection, system identification, and control. Proceedings of the IEEE, 92(3), 423–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrieu, C. and Thoms, J. 2008. A tutorial on adaptive MCMC. Statistics and Computing, 18(4), 343–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrieu, C., Doucet, A., and Holenstein, R. 2010. Particle Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. The Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 72(3), 269–342.Google Scholar

Arasaratnam, I. and Haykin, S. 2009. Cubature Kalman filters. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 54(6), 1254–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arasaratnam, I. and Haykin, S. 2011. Cubature Kalman smoothers. Automatica, 47(10), 2245–2250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arasaratnam, I., Haykin, S., and Elliott, R. J. 2007. Discrete-time nonlinear filtering algorithms using Gauss-Hermite quadrature. Proceedings of the IEEE, 95(5), 953–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arasaratnam, I., Haykin, S., and Hurd, T. R. 2010. Cubature Kalman filtering for continuous-discrete systems: theory and simulations. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 58(10), 4977–4993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bar-Shalom, Y. and Li, X.-R. 1995. Multitarget-Multisensor Tracking: Principles and Techniques. YBS Publishing.Google Scholar

Bar-Shalom, Y., Li, X.-R., and Kirubarajan, T. 2001. Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation. Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barber, D. 2006. Expectation correction for smoothed inference in switching linear dynamical systems. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7, 2515–2540.Google Scholar

Barber, D. 2011. Approximate inference in switching linear dynamical systems using Gaussian mixtures. Chapter 8, pages 166–181 of: Barber, D., Cemgil, A. T., and Chiappa, S.(eds.), Bayesian Time Series Models. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, J. O. 1985. Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernardo, J. M. and Smith, A. F. M. 1994. Bayesian Theory. John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bierman, G. J. 1977. Factorization Methods for Discrete Sequential Estimation. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bishop, C. M. 2006. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer.Google Scholar

Blackman, S. and Popoli, R. 1999. Design and Analysis of Modern Tracking Systems. Artech House Radar Library.Google Scholar

Briers, M., Doucet, A., and Maskell, S. 2010. Smoothing algorithms for state-space models. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 62(1), 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, S., Gelman, A., Jones, G. L., and Meng, X.-L. 2011. Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Chapman & Hall/CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cappé, O., Moulines, E., and Rydén, T. 2005. Inference in Hidden Markov Models. Springer.Google Scholar

Challa, S., Morelande, M. R., Mušicki, D., and Evans, R. J. 2011. Fundamentals of Object Tracking. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, R. and Liu, J. S. 2000. Mixture Kalman filters. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 62(3), 493–508.Google Scholar

Cox, H. 1964. On the estimation of state variables and parameters for noisy dynamic systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 9(1), 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crassidis, J. L. and Junkins, J. L. 2004. Optimal Estimation of Dynamic Systems. Chapman & Hall/CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Creal, D. 2012. A survey of sequential Monte Carlo methods for economics and finance. Econometric Reviews, 31(3), 245–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crisan, D. and Doucet, A. 2002. A survey of convergence results on particle filtering for practitioners. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 50(3), 736–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crisan, D. and Rozovskii, B. (eds.) 2011. The Oxford Handbook of Nonlinear Filtering. Oxford University Press.

Daum, F. and Huang, J. 2003. Curse of dimensionality and particle filters. Pages 1979–1993 of: Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference,vol.4.Google Scholar

Deisenroth, M. P., Huber, M. F., and Hanebeck, U. D. 2009. Analytic moment-based Gaussian process filtering. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Machine Learning.Google Scholar

Deisenroth, M., Turner, R., Huber, M., Hanebeck, U., and Rasmussen, C. 2012. Robust filtering and smoothing with Gaussian processes. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 57(7), 1865–1871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dempster, A., Laird, N., and Rubin, D. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 39(1), 1–38.Google Scholar

Djuric, P. and Miguez, J. 2002. Sequential particle filtering in the presence of additive Gaussian noise with unknown parameters. Pages 1621–1624 of: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), vol.2.Google Scholar

Douc, R., Garivier, A., Moulines, E., and Olsson, J. 2011. Sequential Monte Carlo smoothing for general state space hidden Markov models. Annals of Applied Probability, 21(6), 2109–2145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doucet, A., Godsill, S. J., and Andrieu, C. 2000. On sequential Monte Carlo sampling methods for Bayesian filtering. Statistics and Computing, 10(3), 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doucet, A., De Freitas, N., and Gordon, N. 2001. Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duane, S., Kennedy, A. D., Pendleton, B. J., and Roweth, D. 1987. Hybrid Monte Carlo. Physics Letters B, 195(2), 216–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fearnhead, P. 2002. Markov chain Monte Carlo, sufficient statistics, and particle filters. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 11(4), 848–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fearnhead, P. and Clifford, P. 2003. On-line inference for Hidden Markov models via particle filters. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 65(4), 887–899.Google Scholar

Fong, W., Godsill, S. J., Doucet, A., and West, M. 2002. Monte Carlo smoothing with application to audio signal enhancement. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 50(2), 438–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraser, D. and Potter, J. 1969. The optimum linear smoother as a combination of two optimum linear filters. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 14(4), 387–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelb, A. 1974. Applied Optimal Estimation. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gelb, A. and Vander Velde, W. 1968. Multiple-Input Describing Functions and Nonlinear System Design. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., and Rubin, D. R. 2004. Bayesian Data Analysis. Second edn. Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar

Gilks, W., Richardson, S., and Spiegelhalter, D. (eds.) 1996. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. Chapman & Hall.

Godsill, S. J. and Rayner, P. J. 1998. Digital Audio Restoration: a Statistical Model Based Approach. Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godsill, S. J., Doucet, A., and West, M. 2004. Monte Carlo smoothing for nonlinear time series. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99(465), 156–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golub, G. H. and van Loan, C. F. 1996. Matrix Computations. Third edn. The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Golub, G. H. and Welsch, J. H. 1969. Calculation of Gauss quadrature rules. Mathematics of Computation, 23(106), 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gonzalez, R. C. and Woods, R. E. 2008. Digital Image Processing. Third edn. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Gordon, N. J., Salmond, D. J., and Smith, A. F. M. 1993. Novel approach to nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian state estimation. Pages 107–113 of: IEEE Proceedings on Radar and Signal Processing, vol. 140.Google Scholar

Grewal, M. S. and Andrews, A. P. 2001. Kalman Filtering, Theory and Practice Using MATLAB. Wiley.Google Scholar

Grewal, M. S., Miyasako, R. S., and Smith, J. M. 1988. Application of fixed point smoothing to the calibration, alignment and navigation data of inertial navigation systems. Pages 476–479 of: Position Location and Navigation Symposium.Google Scholar

Grewal, M. S., Weill, L. R., and Andrews, A. P. 2001. Global Positioning Systems, Inertial Navigation and Integration. Wiley.Google Scholar

Gupta, N. and Mehra, R. 1974. Computational aspects of maximum likelihood estimation and reduction in sensitivity function calculations. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 774–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gustafsson, F. and Hendeby, G. 2012. Some relations between extended and unscented Kalman filters. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 60(2), 545–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haario, H., Saksman, E., and Tamminen, J. 1999. Adaptive proposal distribution for random walk Metropolis algorithm. Computational Statistics, 14(3), 375–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haario, H., Saksman, E., and Tamminen, J. 2001. An adaptive Metropolis algorithm. Bernoulli, 7(2), 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartikainen, J. and Särkkä, S. 2010. Kalman filtering and smoothing solutions to temporal Gaussian process regression models. Pages 379–384 of: Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP).Google Scholar

Hauk, O. 2004. Keep it simple: a case for using classical minimum norm estimation in the analysis of EEG and MEG data. NeuroImage, 21(4), 1612–1621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hayes, M. H. 1996. Statistical Digital Signal Processing and Modeling. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar

Haykin, S. 2001. Kalman Filtering and Neural Networks. Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hiltunen, P., Särkkä, S., Nissilä, I., Lajunen, A., and Lampinen, J. 2011. State space regularization in the nonstationary inverse problem for diffuse optical tomography. Inverse Problems, 27, 025–009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ho, Y. C. and Lee, R. C. K. 1964. A Bayesian approach to problems in stochastic estimation and control. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 9(4), 333–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hu, X., Schön, T., and Ljung, L. 2008. A basic convergence result for particle filtering. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 56(4), 1337–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hu, X., Schön, T., and Ljung, L. 2011. A general convergence result for particle filtering. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 59(7), 3424–3429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurzeler, M. and Kunsch, H. R. 1998. Monte Carlo approximations for general statespace models. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7(2), 175–193.Google Scholar

Ito, K. and Xiong, K. 2000. Gaussian filters for nonlinear filtering problems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 45(5), 910–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jazwinski, A. H. 1966. Filtering for nonlinear dynamical systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 11(4), 765–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jazwinski, A. H. 1970. Stochastic Processes and Filtering Theory. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Julier, S. J. and Uhlmann, J. K. 1995. A General Method of Approximating Nonlinear Transformations of Probability Distributions. Tech. rept. Robotics Research Group, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford.Google Scholar

Julier, S. J. and Uhlmann, J. K. 2004. Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation. Proceedings of the IEEE, 92(3), 401–422.Google Scholar

Julier, S. J., Uhlmann, J. K., and Durrant-Whyte, H. F. 1995. A new approach for filtering nonlinear systems. Pages 1628–1632 of: Proceedings of the 1995 American Control, Conference, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar

Julier, S. J., Uhlmann, J. K., and Durrant-Whyte, H. F. 2000. A new method for the nonlinear transformation of means and covariances in filters and estimators. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 45(3), 477–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kailath, T., Sayed, A. H., and Hassibi, B. 2000. Linear Estimation. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Kaipio, J. and Somersalo, E. 2005. Statistical and Computational Inverse Problems. Applied Mathematical Sciences no. 160. Springer.Google Scholar

Kalman, R. E. 1960a. Contributions to the theory of optimal control. Boletin de la Sociedad Matematica Mexicana, 5(1), 102–119.Google Scholar

Kalman, R. E. 1960b. A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Basic Engineering, 82(1), 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kalman, R. E. and Bucy, R. S. 1961. New results in linear filtering and prediction theory. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Basic Engineering, 83(3), 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kantas, N., Doucet, A., Singh, S., and Maciejowski, J. 2009. An overview of sequential Monte Carlo methods for parameter estimation in general state-space models. In: Proceedings IFAC Symposium on System Identification (SYSID).Google Scholar

Kaplan, E. D. 1996. Understanding GPS, Principles and Applications. Artech House.Google Scholar

Keeling, M. and Rohani, P. 2007. Modeling Infectious Diseases in Humans and Animals. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kelly, C. N. and Anderson, B. D. O. 1971. On the stability of fixed-lag smoothing algorithms. Journal of Franklin Institute, 291(4), 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, C.-J. 1994. Dynamic linear models with Markov-switching. Journal of Econo-metrics, 60, 1–22.Google Scholar

Kitagawa, G. 1987. Non-Gaussian state-space modeling of nonstationary time series. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(400), 1032–1041.Google Scholar

Kitagawa, G. 1994. The two-filter formula for smoothing and an implementation of the Gaussian-sum smoother. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 46(4), 605–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitagawa, G. 1996. Monte Carlo filter and smoother for Non-Gaussian nonlinear state space models. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5(1), 1–25.Google Scholar

Lee, R. C. K. 1964. Optimal Estimation, Identification and Control. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lefebvre, T., Bruyninckx, H., and Schutter, J. D. 2002. Comment on “A new method for the nonlinear transformation of means and covariances in filters and estimators” [and authors' reply]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 47(8), 1406–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leondes, C. T., Peller, J. B., and Stear, E. B. 1970. Nonlinear smoothing theory. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, 6(1), 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lin, F.-H., Wald, L. L., Ahlfors, S. P., Hämäläinen, M. S., Kwong, K. K., and Belliveau, J. W. 2006. Dynamic magnetic resonance inverse imaging of human brain function. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 56(4), 787–802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lindsten, F. 2011. Rao-Blackwellised Particle Methods for Inference and Identification. Licentiate's thesis, Linkoping University.Google Scholar

Liu, J. S. 2001. Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing. Springer.Google Scholar

Liu, J. S. and Chen, R. 1995. Blind deconvolution via sequential imputations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(430), 567–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luenberger, D. G. and Ye, Y. 2008. Linear and Nonlinear Programming. Third edn. Springer.Google Scholar

Maybeck, P. 1982a. Stochastic Models, Estimation and Control. Vol. 3. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Maybeck, P. 1982b. Stochastic Models, Estimation and Control. Vol. 2. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Mbalawata, I. S., Särkkä, S., and Haario, H. 2013. Parameter estimation in stochastic differential equations with Markov chain Monte Carlo and non-linear Kalman filtering. Computational Statistics, 28(3), 1195–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meditch, J. S. 1969. Stochastic Optimal Linear Estimation and Control. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Milton, J. S. and Arnold, J. C. 1995. Introduction to Probability and Statistics, Principles and Applications for Engineering and the Computing Sciences. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Moore, J. B. 1973. Discrete-time fixed-lag smoothing algorithms. Automatica, 9(2), 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, J. B. and Tam, P. 1973. Fixed-lag smoothing of nonlinear systems with discrete measurement. Information Sciences, 6, 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morf, M., Levy, B., and Kailath, T. 1978. Square-root algorithms for the continuous-time linear least-square estimation problem. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 23(5), 907–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murray, J. D. 1993. Mathematical Biology. Springer.Google Scholar

Murray, L. and Storkey, A. 2011. Particle smoothing in continuous time: a fast approach via density estimation. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 59(3), 1017–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neal, R. M. 2011. MCMC using Hamiltonian dynamics. Chapter 5 of: Brooks, S., Gelman, A., Jones, G. L., and Meng, X.-L. (eds.), Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar

Neal, R. and Hinton, G. 1999. A view of the EM algorithm that justifies incremental, sparse, and other variants. Pages 355–370 of: Jordan, M. I. (ed.), Learning in Graphical Models. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Ninness, B. and Henriksen, S. 2010. Bayesian system identification via Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques. Automatica, 46(1), 40–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ninness, B., Wills, A., and Schön, T. B. 2010. Estimation of general nonlinear statespace systems. Pages 6371–6376 of: Proceedings of the 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), Atlanta USA.Google Scholar

Nørgaard, M., Poulsen, N. K., and Ravn, O. 2000. New developments in state estimation for nonlinear systems. Automatica, 36(11), 1627–1638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Hagan, A. 1991. Bayes-Hermite quadrature. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 29 (3), 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Øksendal, B. 2003. Stochastic Differential Equations: an Introduction with Applications. Sixth edn. Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olsson, R., Petersen, K., and Lehn-Schiøler, T. 2007. State-space models: from the EM algorithm to a gradient approach. Neural Computation, 19(4), 1097–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piché, R., Särkkä, S., and Hartikainen, J. 2012. Recursive outlier-robust filtering and smoothing for nonlinear systems using the multivariate Student-t distribution. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP).Google Scholar

Pitt, M. K. and Shephard, N. 1999. Filtering via simulation: auxiliary particle filters. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 590–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poyiadjis, G., Doucet, A., and Singh, S. 2011. Particle approximations of the score and observed information matrix in state space models with application to parameter estimation. Biometrika, 98(1), 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Proakis, J. G. 2001. Digital Communications. Fourth edn. McGraw-Hill.

Punskaya, E., Doucet, A., and Fitzgerald, W. J. 2002. On the use and misuse of particle filtering in digital communications. In: Proceedings of EUSIPCO.Google Scholar

Raiffa, H. and Schlaifer, R. 2000. Applied Statistical Decision Theory. John Wiley & Sons, Wiley Classics Library.

Rasmussen, C. E. and Williams, C. K. I. 2006. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Rauch, H. E. 1963. Solutions to the linear smoothing problem. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 8(4), 371–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rauch, H. E., Tung, F., and Striebel, C. T. 1965. Maximum likelihood estimates of linear dynamic systems. AIAA Journal, 3(8), 1445–1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ristic, B., Arulampalam, S., and Gordon, N. 2004. Beyond the Kalman Filter. Artech House.Google Scholar

Roberts, G. O. and Rosenthal, J. S. 2001. Optimal scaling for various Metropolis-Hastings algorithms. Statistical Science, 16(4), 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roweis, S. and Ghahramani, Z. 2001. Learning nonlinear dynamical systems using the expectation-maximization algorithm. Chapter 6, pages 175–220 of: Haykin, S. (ed.), Kalman Filtering and Neural Networks. Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar

Sage, A. P. and Melsa, J. L. 1971. Estimation Theory with Applications to Communications and Control. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Saha, S., Ozkan, E., Gustafsson, F., and Smidl, V. 2010. Marginalized particle filters for Bayesian estimation of Gaussian noise parameters. Pages 1–8 of: 13th Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION).Google Scholar

Sandblom, F. and Svensson, L. 2012. Moment estimation using a marginalized transform. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 60(12), 6138–6150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Särkkä, S. 2006. Recursive Bayesian Inference on Stochastic Differential Equations. Doctoral dissertation, Helsinki University of Technology.Google Scholar

Särkkä, S. 2007. On unscented Kalman filtering for state estimation of continuous-time nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 52(9), 1631–1641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Särkkä, S. 2008. Unscented Rauch-Tung-Striebel smoother. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 53(3), 845–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Särkkä, S. 2010. Continuous-time and continuous-discrete-time unscented Rauch-Tung-Striebel smoothers. Signal Processing, 90(1), 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Särkkä, S. 2011. Linear operators and stochastic partial differential equations in Gaussian process regression. In: Proceedings of ICANN.Google Scholar

Särkkä, S. and Hartikainen, J. 2010a. On Gaussian optimal smoothing of non-linear state space models. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 55(8), 1938–1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Särkkä, S. and Hartikainen, J. 2010b. Sigma point methods in optimal smoothing of non-linear stochastic state space models. Pages 184–189 of: Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP).Google Scholar

Särkkä, S. and Hartikainen, J. 2012. Infinite-dimensional Kalman filtering approach to spatio-temporal Gaussian process regression. In: Proceedings of AISTATS 2012.Google Scholar

Särkkä, S. and Nummenmaa, A. 2009. Recursive noise adaptive Kalman filtering by variational Bayesian approximations. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 54(3), 596–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Särkkä, S. and Sarmavuori, J. 2013. Gaussian filtering and smoothing for continuous-discrete dynamic systems. Signal Processing, 93(2), 500–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Särkkä, S. and Solin, A. 2012. On continuous-discrete cubature Kalman filtering. Pages 1210–1215 of: Proceedings of SYSID 2012.Google Scholar

Särkkä, S. and Sottinen, T. 2008. Application of Girsanov theorem to particle filtering of discretely observed continuous-time non-linear systems. Bayesian Analysis, 3(3), 555–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Särkkä, S., Vehtari, A., and Lampinen, J. 2007a. CATS benchmark time series prediction by Kalman smoother with cross-validated noise density. Neurocomputing, 70(13–15), 2331–2341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Särkkä, S., Vehtari, A., and Lampinen, J. 2007b. Rao-Blackwellized particle filter for multiple target tracking. Information Fusion Journal, 8(1), 2–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Särkkä, S., Bunch, P., and Godsill, S. J. 2012a. A backward-simulation based Rao-Blackwellized particle smoother for conditionally linear Gaussian models. Pages 506–511 of: Proceedings of SYSID 2012.Google Scholar

Särkkä, S., Solin, A., Nummenmaa, A., Vehtari, A., Auranen, T., Vanni, S., and Lin, F.-H. 2012b. Dynamic retrospective filtering of physiological noise in BOLD fMRI: DRIFTER. NeuroImage, 60(2), 1517–1527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sarmavuori, J. and Särkkä, S. 2012a. Fourier-Hermite Kalman filter. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 57(6), 1511–1515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sarmavuori, J. and Särkkä, S. 2012b. Fourier-Hermite Rauch-Tung-Striebel Smoother. In: Proceedings of EUSIPCO.Google Scholar

Schön, T. and Gustafsson, F. 2003. Particle filters for system identification of statespace models linear in either parameters or states. Pages 1287–1292 of: Proceedings of the 13th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar

Schön, T., Gustafsson, F., and Nordlund, P.-J. 2005. Marginalized particle filters for mixed linear/nonlinear state-space models. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 53(7), 2279–2289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schön, T., Wills, A., and Ninness, B. 2011. System identification of nonlinear statespace models. Automatica, 47(1), 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Segal, M. and Weinstein, E. 1989. A new method for evaluating the log-likelihood gradient, the Hessian, and the Fisher information matrix for linear dynamic systems. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 35(3), 682–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Šhiryaev, A. N. 1996. Probability. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shumway, R. and Stoffer, D. 1982. An approach to time series smoothing and forecasting using the EM algorithm. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 3(4), 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simandl, M. and Dunik, J. 2006. Design of derivative-free smoothers and predictors. Pages 991–996 of: Preprints of the 14th IFAC Symposium on System Identification.Google Scholar

Singer, H. 2008. Nonlinear continuous time modeling approaches in panel research. Statistica Neerlandica, 62(1), 29–57.Google Scholar

Singer, H. 2011. Continuous-discrete state-space modeling of panel data with nonlinear filter algorithms. AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, 95(4), 375–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, C., Bengtsson, T., Bickel, P., and Anderson, J. 2008. Obstacles to high-dimensional particle filtering. Monthly Weather Review, 136(12), 4629–4640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stengel, R. F. 1994. Optimal Control and Estimation. Dover.Google Scholar

Stone, L. D., Barlow, C. A., and Corwin, T. L. 1999. Bayesian Multiple Target Tracking. Artech House.Google Scholar

Storvik, G. 2002. Particle filters in state space models with the presence of unknown static parameters. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 50(2), 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stratonovich, R. L. 1968. Conditional Markov Processes and Their Application to the Theory of Optimal Control. Elsevier.Google Scholar

Striebel, C. T. 1965. Partial differential equations for the conditional distribution of a Markov process given noisy observations. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 11, 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tam, P., Tam, D., and Moore, J. 1973. Fixed-lag demodulation of discrete noisy measurements of FM signals. Automatica, 9(6), 725–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tarantola, A. 2004. Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Esti-mation. SIAM.Google Scholar

Titterton, D. H. and Weston, J. L. 1997. Strapdown Inertial Navigation Technology. Peter Peregrinus Ltd.Google Scholar

Väänänen, V. 2012. Gaussian Filtering and Smoothing Based Parameter Estimation in Nonlinear Models for Sequential Data. Master's Thesis, Aalto University.Google Scholar

Van der Merwe, R. and Wan, E. 2003. Sigma-point Kalman filters for probabilistic inference in dynamic state-space models. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Advances in Machine Learning.Google Scholar

Van der Merwe, R. and Wan, E. A. 2001. The square-root unscented Kalman filter for state and parameter estimation. Pages 3461–3464 of: International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.Google Scholar

Van der Merwe, R., De Freitas, N., Doucet, A., and Wan, E. 2001. The unscented particle filter. Pages 584–590 of: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 13.Google Scholar

Van Trees, H. L. 1968. Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory Part I. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Van Trees, H. L. 1971. Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory Part II. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Vihola, M. 2012. Robust adaptive Metropolis algorithm with coerced acceptance rate. Statistics and Computing, 22(5), 997–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Viterbi, A. J. 1967. Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 13(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wan, E. A. and Van der Merwe, R. 2001. The unscented Kalman filter. Chapter 7 of: Haykin, S. (ed.), Kalman Filtering and Neural Networks. Wiley.Google Scholar

West, M. and Harrison, J. 1997. Bayesian Forecasting and Dynamic Models. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Wiener, N. 1950. Extrapolation, Interpolation and Smoothing of Stationary Time Series with Engineering Applications. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Wills, A., Schön, T. B., Ljung, L., and Ninness, B. 2013. Identification of Hammerstein-Wiener models. Automatica, 49(1), 70–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wu, Y., Hu, D., Wu, M., and Hu, X. 2005. Unscented Kalman filtering for additive noise case: augmented versus nonaugmented. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 12(5), 357–360.Google Scholar

Wu, Y., Hu, D., Wu, M., and Hu, X. 2006. A numerical-integration perspective on Gaussian filters. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 54(8), 2910–2921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ypma, A. and Heskes, T. 2005. Novel approximations for inference in nonlinear dynamical systems using expectation propagation. Neurocomputing, 69(1), 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zoeter, O. and Heskes, T. 2011. Expectation propagation and generalized EP methods for inference in switching linear dynamical systems. Chapter 7, pages 141–165 of: Bayesian Time Series Models. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar