Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Becoming Heinrich Schenker
  • Cited by 10
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
August 2014
Print publication year:
2014
Online ISBN:
9781107705579
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107705579
Subjects:
Twentieth-Century and Contemporary Music, Music, Music Criticism
Information

Book description

Much controversy surrounds Schenker's mature theory and its attempt to explain musical pitch motion. Becoming Heinrich Schenker brings a new perspective to Schenker's theoretical work, showing that ideas characteristic of his mature theory, although in many respects fundamentally different, developed logically out of his earlier ideas. Robert P. Morgan provides an introduction to Schenker's mature theory and traces its development through all of his major publications, considering each in detail and with numerous music examples. Morgan also explores the relationship between Schenker's theory and his troubled ideology, which crucially influenced the evolution of his ideas and was heavily dependent upon both the empirical and idealist strains of contemporary German philosophical thought. Relying where possible on quotations from Schenker's own words, this book offers a balanced approach to his theory and a unique overview of this central music figure, generally considered to be the most prominent music theorist of the twentieth century.

Reviews

'A major contribution to the scholarly literature on one of the most important (and controversial) music theorists of the twentieth century, Becoming Heinrich Schenker traces the emergence and development of Schenker’s mature theory through each of his published works. The book provides commentary on existing Schenker literature and on translations of and scholarship on his work, including extensions of the analytical techniques … [It] will be an important companion resource for anyone studying Schenkerian analysis … Highly recommended …'

C. A. Traupman-Carr Source: Choice

'Morgan’s writing is clear, concise, well-organized, and persuasive … Throughout his book, Morgan shows impressive command of primary and secondary literature and provides thoughtful commentary on the controversy surrounding Schenker … Morgan’s work is knowledgeable, accessible, and provocative.’

Brien Weiner Source: Notes: Quarterly Journal of the Music Library Association

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Contents

Contents
References

Works cited

Works by Heinrich Schenker

(1903/1908). Ein Beitrag zur Ornamentik, als Einführung zu Ph. Emanuel Bachs Klavierwerken, mitumfassend auch die Ornamentik Haydns, Mozarts, Beethovens, etc. (Vienna: Universal Edition, 1903); rev. 2nd edn., 1908. “A Contribution to the Study of Ornamentation,” translation of the 2nd edn. by Hedi Siegel, The Music Forum IV (1976), pp. 1–139. Google Scholar
(1906/1954). Neue musikalische Theorien und Phantasien I: Die Harmonielehre (Berlin and Stuttgart: J. G. Cotta Verlag, 1906); reprinted by Universal Edition, 1978. Harmony, partially translated by Elizabeth Mann Borghese (University of Chicago Press, 1954). Google Scholar
(1910a/1987). Neue musikalische Theorien und Phantasien II: Kontrapunkt I (Berlin and Stuttgart: J. G. Cotta Verlag, 1910); reprinted by Georg Olms Verlag, 1991. Counterpoint I, translated by John Rothgeb and Jürgen Thym (New York: Schirmer Books, 1987). Google Scholar
(1910b/1984). J. S. Bach, Chromatische Phantasie und Fuge D-moll: Kritische Ausgabe mit Anhang (Vienna: Universal Edition, 1910); rev. edn. 1969. J. S. Bach’s Chromatic Fantasy and Fugue, translated by Hedi Siegel (New York: Longman, 1984). Google Scholar
(1912/1992). Beethovens Neunte Symphonie: Eine Darstellung des musikalischen Inhalten unter fortlaufender Berücksichtung auch des Vortrags und der Literatur (Vienna: Universal Edition, 1912). Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, translated by John Rothgeb (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1992). Google Scholar
(1913/1971a). Die letzten fünf Sonaten von Beethoven, Kritische Ausgabe mit Einführung und Erläuterung (Vienna, Universal Edition): Sonate E dur Op. 109 (1913); rev. edn., edited by Oswald Jonas, 1971. Google Scholar
(1914/1972a). Die letzten fünf Sonaten von Beethoven, Kritische Ausgabe mit Einführung und Erläuterung (Vienna, Universal Edition): Sonate As dur Op. 110 (1914); rev. edn., edited by Oswald Jonas, 1972. Google Scholar
(1915/1971b). Die letzten fünf Sonaten von Beethoven, Kritische Ausgabe mit Einführung und Erläuterung (Vienna, Universal Edition): Sonate C moll Op. 111 (1915); rev. edn., edited by Oswald Jonas, 1971. Google Scholar
(1921/1972b). Die letzten fünf Sonaten von Beethoven, Kritische Ausgabe und Einführung mit Erläuterung (Vienna, Universal Edition): Sonate A dur Op. 101 (1921); rev. edn., edited by Oswald Jonas, 1972. Google Scholar
(1921–24/2004–05). Der Tonwille.10 issues: (1) 1921; (2) 1922; (3) 1922; (4) 1923; (5) 1923; (6) 1923; (7) 1924; (8/9) 1924; (10) 1924 (Vienna, Universal Edition). Der Tonwille, various translators, edited by William Drabkin in two volumes (Oxford University Press, 2004–05). Google Scholar
(1922/1987). Neue musikalische Theorien und Phantasien II: Kontrapunkt II (Vienna: Universal Edition, 1922); reprinted by Georg Olms Verlag, 1991. Counterpoint II, translation by John Rothgeb and Jürgen Thym (New York: Schirmer Books, 1987). Google Scholar
(1925/1994), (1926/1996), (1930/1997). Das Meisterwerk in der Musik: Ein Jahrbuch (Munich; Vienna: Drei Masken Verlag, 1925, 1926, 1930). The Masterwork in Music, various translators, edited by William Drabkin in three volumes (Cambridge University Press, 1994, 1996, 1997). Google Scholar
(1932/1969b). Fünf Urlinie-Tafeln / Five Analyses in Sketchform (New York: David Mannes School, 1932). Five Graphic Music Analyses, edited, translated, and with a new introduction by Felix Salzer (New York: Dover Publications, 1969). Google Scholar
(1935/1979). Der freie Satz (Vienna: Universal Edition, 1935); rev. edn., edited by Oswald Jonas (Vienna: Universal Edition, 1956). Free Composition, translated and edited by Ernst Oster in two volumes (New York: Longman, 1979). Google Scholar
(1985). Heinrich Schenker nach Tagebüchern und Briefen, edited by Hellmut Federhofer (Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag). Google Scholar
(1990/1988). Heinrich Schenker als Essayist und Kritiker: gesammelte Aufsätze, Rezensionen und kleinere Berichte aus den Jahren 1891–1901, Hellmut Federhofer (ed.) (Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag, 1990). “Der Geist der musikalischen Technik,” translated by William Pastille, Theoria 3 (1988), pp. 86–104. (Article partially translated in Pastille (1984)). Google Scholar
(2005). Über den Niedergang der Kompositionskunst (“The Decline of the Art of Composition”), unfinished book edited and translated by William Drabkin, published in both German and English, Music Analysis 24/1–2, pp. 1–232. Google Scholar

Works by others

Alberti, Leon Batista. (1955). Ten Books of Architecture, translated into Italian by Cosimo Batoli and into English by James Leoni, edited by Joseph Rykwert (London: A. Taranti). Google Scholar
Alpern, Wayne. (1999). “Music Theory as a Mode of Law: The Case of Heinrich Schenker, Esq.,” Cardozo Law Review 205–06, pp. 1459–1511. Google Scholar
Baker, James M. (1990). “Voice-Leading in Post Tonal Music: Suggestions for Extending Schenker’s Theory,” Music Analysis 9/2, pp. 177–200. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Barford, Philip. (1975). “Music in the Philosophy of Schopenhauer,” Soundings 5, pp. 29–43. Google Scholar
Bent, Ian. (2005). “‘That Bright New Light’: Schenker, Universal Edition, and the Origins of the Erläuterung Series, 1901–1910,” Journal of the American Musicological Society 28/1 (Spring), pp. 69–138. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Bent, Ian and Drabkin, William. “Schenker Documents Online,” www.schenkerdocumentsonline.org/colloquy/heinrich_schenker.html. Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. (1953). The Hedgehog and the Fox (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson). Google Scholar
Blasius, Leslie David. (1996). Schenker’s Argument and the Claims of Music Theory (Cambridge University Press). CrossRef | Google Scholar
Brown, Matthew. (1991). Review of Schenker Studies, edited by Hedi Siegel, Music Theory Spectrum 13/2, pp. 265–73. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Brown, Matthew. (2006). Explaining Tonality: Schenkerian Theory and Beyond (University of Rochester Press). CrossRef | Google Scholar
Burstein, L. Poundie. (2005). “Unraveling Schenker’s Concept of the Auxiliary Cadence,” Music Theory Spectrum 27/2 (Fall), pp. 159–85. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Cadwallader, Allen. (1998). Analysis of Tonal Music (Oxford University Press). Google Scholar
Caplin, William E. (1998). Classical Form. A Theory of Formal Functions for the Instrumental Music of Haydn, Mozart, and Beethoven (New York: Oxford University Press). CrossRef | Google Scholar
Chamberlin, J. Edward and Gilman, Sander L., eds. (1985). Degeneration: The Dark Side of Progress (New York: Columbia University Press). CrossRef | Google Scholar
Christensen, Thomas, ed. (2002). The Cambridge History of Western Music Theory (Cambridge University Press). CrossRef | Google Scholar
Clark, Suzannah. (1999). “Schenker’s Mysterious Five,” 19th-Century Music 23/1, pp. 84–102. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Clifton, Thomas. (1970). “An Application of Goethe’s Concept of Steigerung to the Morphology of Diminution,” Journal of Music Theory 14/2, pp. 165–89. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Cohn, Richard. (1992a). “Schenker’s Theory, Schenkerian Theory: Pure Unity or Constructive Conflict?” Indiana Theory Review 13/1, pp. 1–19. Google Scholar
Cohn, Richard. (1992b). “The Anatomy of Motives in Schenkerian Accounts of Tonal Music,” Music Theory Spectrum 14/2, pp. 150–70. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Cook, Nicholas. (2007). The Schenker Project (New York: Oxford University Press). CrossRef | Google Scholar
Crews, Frederick. (2011). “Physician, Heal Thyself: Part II,” The New York Review of Books 58/15, October 13. Google Scholar
Cumming, Naomi. (2000). The Sonic Self: Musical Subjectivity and Signification (Bloomington: Indiana University Press). Google Scholar
Dubiel, Joseph. (1990). “When You Are Beethoven: Kinds of Rules in Schenker’s Counterpoint,” Journal of Music Theory 34/2, pp. 291–340. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Duerksen, Marva. (2008). “Schenker’s Organicism Revisited,” Intégral 22, pp. 1–58. Google Scholar
Eybl, Martin. (1995). Ideologie und Methode. Zum ideengeschichtlichen Kontext von Schenkers Musiktheorie (Tutzing: Hans Schneider). Google Scholar
Forte, Allen. (1959). “Schenker’s Conception of Musical Structure,” Journal of Music Theory 3, pp. 1–30. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Gleick, James. (2003). Isaac Newton (New York: Pantheon Books). Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. (1977). Ever Since Darwin (New York: W. W. Norton). Google Scholar
Haeckel, Ernst. (1901). The Riddle of the Universe, translated by Joseph McCabe (New York: Harper and Brothers). Google Scholar
Hanslick, Eduard. (1990/1986). Vom Musikalisch-Schönen, edited by Dietmar Strauss (Mainz: Schott). Translation (1986) by Geoffrey Payzant: On the Musically Beautiful (Indianapolis: Hackett). Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1954). The Philosophy of Hegel, edited by Karl J. Friedrich (New York: Random House). Google Scholar
Hepokoski, James and Darcy, Warren. (2006). Elements of Sonata Theory: Norms, Types, and Deformations in the Late-Eighteenth-Century Sonata (New York: Oxford University Press). CrossRef | Google Scholar
Hume, David. (1978) [1739–40]. A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge (Oxford: Clarendon Press). Google Scholar
Jackson, Timothy: Center for Schenkerian Studies. Heinrich Schenker (1868–1935), www.music.unt.edu/mhte/schenker Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. (2000) [1790]. The Critique of Judgment, translated by J. H. Bernard (Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books). CrossRef | Google Scholar
Karnes, Kevin C. (2008). Music, Criticism, and the Challenge of History (Oxford University Press). CrossRef | Google Scholar
Kassler, Michael. (1977). “Explication of the Middleground of Schenker’s Theory of Tonality,” Miscellanea Musicologiea: Adelaide Studies in Musicology 9/1, pp. 72–81. Google Scholar
Keiler, Allan. (1983). “On Some Properties of Schenker’s Pitch Derivations,” Music Perception 1/2, pp. 200–28. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Keiler, Allan. (1989). “The Origins of Schenker’s Thought: How Man is Musical,” Journal of Music Theory, 33/2 (Fall), pp. 273–98. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Kerman, Joseph. (1980). “How We Got into Analysis and How to Get Out,” Critical Inquiry 7/2 (Winter), pp. 311–32. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Komar, Arthur. (1971). Theory of Suspensions: A Study of Metrical and Pitch Relationships in Tonal Music (Princeton University Press). Google Scholar
Korsyn, Kevin. (1988). “Schenker and Kantian Epistemology,” Theoria 3, pp. 1–58. Google Scholar
Korsyn, Kevin. (1993). “Schenker’s Organicism Reexamined,” Intégral 7, 82–118. Google Scholar
Korsyn, Kevin. (2009). Review of Nicholas Cook’s The Schenker Project: Culture, Race, and Music Theory in Fin-de-Siècle Vienna, Music Analysis 28/1, pp. 153–79. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm von. (1951). Leibniz Selections, edited by Philip P. Wiener (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons). Google Scholar
Lerdahl, Fred. (1999). “Spatial and Psychoacoustic Factors in Atonal Prolongation,” Current Musicology 63, pp. 7–26. Google Scholar
Lerdahl, Fred and Jackendoff, Ray. (1983). A Generative Theory of Tonal Music (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press). Google Scholar
Lewontin, Richard C. (2009). “Why Darwin?,” a review of four books on Darwin and evolution, The New York Review of Books 56/9, May 28. Google Scholar
Littlefield, Richard and Neumeyer, David. (1992). “Rewriting Schenker: Narrative-History-Ideology,” Music Theory Spectrum 14/1, pp. 38–65. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur O. (1955). “Schiller and the Genesis of German Romanticism,” Essays in the History of Ideas (New York: George Braziller), pp. 207–27. Google Scholar
Lubben, Joseph. (1993). “Schenker the Progressive: Analytic Practice in Der Tonwille,” Music Theory Spectrum 15/1, pp. 59–75. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst. (1914). The Analysis of Sensations, translated by C. M. Williams (Chicago and London: The Open Court Publishing Company); original German edition, 1886. Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. (1978). The Marx-Engels Reader, 2nd edn., edited by Robert C. Tucker (New York: Norton). Google Scholar
Meeùs, Nicolas. (1993). Heinrich Schenker: une introduction (Liège: Mardaga). Google Scholar
Morgan, Robert P. (1976). “Dissonant Prolongations: Theoretical and Compositional Precedents,” Journal of Music Theory 10/1, pp. 49–91. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Morgan, Robert P. (1978). “Schenker and the Theoretical Tradition: The Concept of Musical Reduction,” College Music Symposium 18/1, pp. 72–96. Google Scholar
Morgan, Robert P. (2002). “Schenker and the Twentieth Century,” Music and the Mirror, edited by Andreas Giger and Thomas J. Mathiesen (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press), pp. 247–74. Google Scholar
Morgan, Robert P. (2005). Review of David W. Beach, Aspects of Unity in J. S. Bach’s Partitas and Suites: An Analytical Study, Journal of Music Theory 49/1, pp. 181–88. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Morgan, Robert P. (2008). “Chopin’s Modular Forms,” Variations on the Canon. Essays on Music from Bach to Boulez in Honor of Charles Rosen on His Eightieth Birthday, edited by Robert Curry, David Gable, and Robert L. Marshall (University of Rochester Press), pp. 185–204. Google Scholar
Narmour, Eugene. (1977). Beyond Schenkerism: The Need for Alternatives in Musical Analysis (University of Chicago Press). Google Scholar
New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians. (2001). Edited by Stanley Sadie. 2nd edn. (London: Macmillan). Google Scholar
Palladio, Andrea. (1997). Four Books on Architecture, translated by Robert Tavernor and Richard Schofield (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press). Google Scholar
Pastille, William. (1984). “Heinrich Schenker, Anti-Organicist?,” 19th-Century Music 8/1, pp. 28–36. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Pastille, William. (1985). “Ursatz: The Musical Philosophy of Heinrich Schenker,” Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University. UMI no. 8525718. Google Scholar
Pastille, William. (1990a). “The Development of the Ursatz in Schenker’s Published Works,” Trends in Schenkerian Research, edited by Allen Cadwallader (New York: Schirmer), pp. 71–86. Google Scholar
Pastille, William. (1990b). “Music and Morphology: Goethe’s Influence on Schenker’s Thought,” Schenker Studies, ed. by Hedi Siegel (Cambridge University Press), pp. 29–44. Google Scholar
Perlman, Marc. (2004). Unplayed Melodies: Javanese Gamelan and the Genesis of Music Theory (Berkeley: University of California Press). Google Scholar
Proctor, Gregory A. and Riggens, Herbert Lee. (1988). “Levels and the Reordering of Chapters in Schenker’s Free Composition,” Music Theory Spectrum 10, pp. 101–26. Google Scholar
Reiter, Andrea. (2003). “‘Von der Sendung des deutschen Genies’: Heinrich Schenker (1868–1935) and Cultural Conservatism,” Resounding Concerns, edited by Rüdiger Görner (Munich: Iudicium Verlag), pp. 135–59. Google Scholar
Renwick, William. (1988). “Brackets and Beams in Schenker’s Graphic Notation,” Theoria 3, pp. 73–85. Google Scholar
Richards, Robert J. (2002). The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe (University of Chicago Press). CrossRef | Google Scholar
Riemann, Hugo. (1903). System der musikalischen Rhythmik und Metrik (Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel). Google Scholar
Riemann, Hugo. (1914–15). “Ideen zu einer ‘Lehre von den Tonvorstellungen,’” Jahrbuch der Musikbibliothek Peters, pp. 1–26. Google Scholar
Riemann, Hugo. (1916). “Neue Beiträge zu einer Lehre von den Tonvorstellungen,” Jahrbuch der Musikbibliothek Peters, pp. 1–21. Google Scholar
Rothfarb, Lee. (2002). “Energetics,” The Cambridge History of Western Music Theory, edited by Thomas Christensen (Cambridge University Press), pp. 927–55. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Rothstein, William. (1981). “Rhythm and the Theory of Structural Levels,” Yale University Dissertation. UMI no. 8124572. Google Scholar
Rothstein, William. (1986). “The Americanization of Schenker,” Theory Only 9/1, pp. 5–17. Reprinted in Schenker Studies, edited by Hedi Siegel (Cambridge University Press, 1990), pp. 193–203. Google Scholar
Rothstein, William. (1989). Phrase Rhythm in Tonal Music (New York, Macmillan). Google Scholar
Rothstein, William. (1991). “On Implied Tones,” Music Analysis 10/3, pp. 289–328. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Rothstein, William. (2001). Review of Schenker-related entries in The New Grove, 2nd edn., Journal of Music Theory 45/1, pp. 204–27. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Salzer, Felix. (1952). Structural Hearing (New York: Charles Boni). Google Scholar
Samarotto, Frank. (1993). Review of David Neimeier and Susan Tepping, A Guide to Schenkerian Analysis, Music Theory Spectrum 15/1 (Spring), pp. 89–93. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Schachter, Carl. (1976). “Rhythm and Linear Analysis: A Preliminary Study,” The Music Forum IV, pp. 281–334. Reprinted in Unfoldings, edited by Joseph N. Straus (Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 3–53. Google Scholar
Schachter, Carl. (1980). “Rhythm and Linear Analysis: Durational Reduction,” The Music Forum V, pp. 197–232. Reprinted in Unfoldings, edited by Joseph N. Straus (Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 54–78. Google Scholar
Schachter, Carl. (1983). “The First Movement of Brahms’s Second Symphony: The Opening Theme and Its Consequences,” Music Analysis 2, pp. 55–68. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Schachter, Carl. (1987a). “Rhythm and Linear Analysis: Aspects of Meter,” The Music Forum VI, pp. 1–60. Reprinted in Unfoldings, edited by Joseph N. Straus (Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 79–117. Google Scholar
Schachter, Carl. (1987b). “Analysis by Key: Another Look at Modulation,” Music Analysis 6/3, pp. 289–307. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Schachter, Carl. (1988). “Chopin’s Fantasy, Op. 49: The Two-Key Scheme,” Chopin Studies, edited by Jim Samson (Cambridge University Press). Reprinted in Unfoldings, edited by Joseph N. Straus (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 260–88. Google Scholar
Schachter, Carl. (1990). “Either/Or,” Schenker Studies, ed. by Hedi Siegel (Cambridge University Press), pp. 45–59. Reprinted in Unfoldings, edited by Joseph N. Straus (Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 121–33. Google Scholar
Schachter, Carl. (1999a). “Structure as Foreground: ‘Das Drama des Ursatzes,’” Schenker Studies 2, edited by Carl Schachter and Hedi Siegel (Cambridge University Press), pp. 298–314. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Schachter, Carl. (1999b). Unfoldings: Essays in Schenkerian Theory and Analysis, edited by Joseph N. Straus (Oxford University Press). Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich. (1970). Schriften zur Literatur, ed. Wolfdietrich Rasch (Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag). Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. (1978) [1800]. System of Transcendental Idealism, translated by Peter Heath (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia). Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich von. (n.d.) Schillers sämtliche Werke, vol. XI (Leipzig: Gustav Fock). Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. (1969). Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung, translated in two volumes by E. F. J. Payne (New York: Dover Publications). Google Scholar
Schorske, Carl E. (1981). Fin-de-Siècle Vienna (New York: Vintage Books). Google Scholar
Siegel, Hedi. (1999). “When ‘Freier Satz’ Was Part of Kontrapunkt: A Preliminary Report,” Schenker Studies 2, edited by Carl Schachter and Hedi Siegel (Cambridge University Press), pp. 12–25. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Siegel, Hedi. (2006). “The Pictures and Words of an Artist (‘von einem Künstler’): Heinrich Schenker’s Fünf Urlinie-Tafeln,” Schenker Traditionen, edited by Martin Eybl and Evelyn Fink-Mennel (Vienna: Böhlau Verlag) , pp. 203–19. Google Scholar
Smith, Charles J. (1996). “Musical Form and Fundamental Structure: An Investigation of Schenker’s Formenlehre,” Music Analysis 15, pp. 191–297. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Smith, Peter. (1994). “Brahms and Schenker: A Mutual Response to Sonata Form,” Music Theory Spectrum 16/1, pp. 77–103. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Smith, Peter. (2006). “Harmonic Cross-Reference and the Dialectic of Articulation and Continuity in Sonata Expositions of Schubert and Brahms,” Journal of Music Theory 50/2 (Fall), pp. 143–79. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Snarrenberg, Robert. (1997). Schenker’s Interpretive Practice (Cambridge University Press). CrossRef | Google Scholar
Solie, Ruth. (1980). “The Living Work: Organicism and Musical Analysis,” 19th-Century Music 4/2, pp. 147–59. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Straus, Joseph. (1987). “The Problem of Prolongation in Post-Tonal Music,” Journal of Music Theory 31/1, pp. 1–21. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Strunk, Oliver, ed. (1998). Source Readings in Music History, rev. edn., Leo Treitler, general editor (New York: W. W. Norton). Google Scholar
Suurpää, Lauri. (2006). “Form, Structure, and Musical Drama in Two Mozart Expositions,” Journal of Music Theory 50/2 (Fall), pp. 181–210. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Travis, Roy. (1970). “Tonal Coherence in the First Movement of Bartok’s Fourth String Quartet,” The Music Forum II, pp. 298–371. Google Scholar
Wason, Robert W. (2006). “From Harmonielehre to Harmony: Schenker’s Theory of Harmony and Its Americanization,” Schenker Traditionen, edited by Martin Eybl and Evelyn Fink-Mennel (Vienna: Böhlau Verlag), pp. 171–201. Google Scholar
Watkins, Holly. (2011). Metaphors of Depth in German Musical Thought (Cambridge University Press). CrossRef | Google Scholar
Weber, William. (2008). The Great Transformation in Musical Taste: Concert Programming from Haydn to Brahms (Cambridge University Press). Google Scholar
Whittall, Arnold. (2002). “Analysis,” The Oxford Companion to Music, edited by Alison Latham (Oxford University Press), pp. 31–37. Google Scholar
Wintle, Christopher. (1985). “Kontra-Schenker: ‘Largo e Mesto’ from Beethoven’s op. 10 no. 3,” Music Analysis 4, 1/2, pp. 145–82. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1967a). Zettel, edited and translated by G. E. M. Anscombe (Berkeley: University of California Press). Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1967b). Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief, edited by Cyril Barrett (Berkeley: University of California Press). Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1977). Remarks on Colour, ed. G. E. M. Anscombe, translated by Linda L. McAlister and Margarete Schaettle (Berkeley: University of California Press). Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (2001). Wittgenstein, Theory and the Arts, edited by Richard Allen and Malcolm Turvey (London and New York: Routledge). Google Scholar

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 145
Total number of PDF views: 2416 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 6020 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st April 2025. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.