Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T11:26:26.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 21 - The Management of Preterm Labour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

Sir Sabaratnam Arulkumaran
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

March of Dimes. March of Dimes white paper on preterm birth: the global and regional toll; 2009 (updated 16 December 2009). www.marchofdimes.org/materials/born-too-soon-global-action-report-on-preterm-birth.pdf (accessed 15 May 2016).Google Scholar
Downey, LJ, Martin, AJ. Ritodrine in the treatment of preterm labour: a study of 213 patients. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983;90(11): 1046–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leitich, H. Controversies in diagnosis of preterm labour. BJOG. 2005;112(suppl. 1): 61–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finnstrom, O, Olausson, PO, Sedin, G, et al. The Swedish national prospective study on extremely low birthweight (ELBW) infants: incidence, mortality, morbidity and survival in relation to level of care. Acta Paediatr. 1997;86(5): 503–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamont, RF, Dunlop, PD, Crowley, P, Elder, MG. Spontaneous preterm labour and delivery at under 34 weeks’ gestation. BMJ. 1983;286(6363): 454–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, JF, Grant, A, Keirse, MJ, Chalmers, I. Beta-mimetics in preterm labour: an overview of the randomized controlled trials. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988;95(3): 211–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valenzuela, GJ, Sanchez-Ramos, L, Romero, R, et al. Maintenance treatment of preterm labor with the oxytocin antagonist atosiban: the Atosiban PTL-098 Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182(5): 1184–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haas, DM, Imperiale, TF, Kirkpatrick, PR, et al. Tocolytic therapy: a meta-analysis and decision analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(3): 585–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamont, RF. The pathophysiology of pulmonary oedema with the use of beta-agonists. BJOG. 2000;107(4): 439–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oei, SG, Mol, BW, de Kleine, MJ, Brolmann, HA. Nifedipine versus ritodrine for suppression of preterm labor: a meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999;78(9): 783–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Tsatsaris, V, Papatsonis, D, Goffinet, F, Dekker, G, Carbonne, B. Tocolysis with nifedipine or beta-adrenergic agonists: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97(5 Pt 2): 840–7.Google ScholarPubMed
King, JF, Flenady, V, Papatsonis, D, Dekker, G, Carbonne, B. Calcium channel blockers for inhibiting preterm labour: a systematic review of the evidence and a protocol for administration of nifedipine. A N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;43(3): 192–8.Google Scholar
King, JF, Flenady, VJ, Papatsonis, DN, Dekker, GA, Carbonne., B. Calcium channel blockers for inhibiting preterm labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;1: CD002255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, RF, Khan, KS, Beattie, B, et al. The quality of nifedipine studies used to assess tocolytic efficacy: a systematic review. J Perinat Med. 2005;33(4): 287–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamont, RF. The development and introduction of anti-oxytocic tocolytics. BJOG. 2003;110(suppl. 20): 108–12.Google ScholarPubMed
Worldwide Atosiban versus Beta-agonists Study Group. Effectiveness and safety of the oxytocin antagonist atosiban versus beta-adrenergic agonists in the treatment of preterm labour. BJOG. 2001;108(2): 133–42.Google Scholar
Papatsonis, D, Flenady, V, Cole, S, Liley, H. Oxytocin receptor antagonists for inhibiting preterm labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;3: CD004452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyndrup, J, Lamont, RF. The choice of a tocolytic for the treatment of preterm labor: a critical evaluation of nifedipine versus atosiban. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2007;16(6): 843–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Heus, R, Mol, BW, Erwich, JJ, et al. Adverse drug reactions to tocolytic treatment for preterm labour: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2009;338: b744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scholz, H. Pharmacological aspects of calcium channel blockers. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1997;10(suppl. 3): 869–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, K, Zamora, J, Lamont, RF, et al. Safety concerns for the use of calcium channel blockers in pregnancy for the treatment of spontaneous preterm labour and hypertension: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonat Med. 2010;23(9): 1030–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Renzo, GC, Roura, LC, Facchinetti, F, et al. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous preterm labor: identification of spontaneous preterm labor, diagnosis of preterm premature rupture of membranes, and preventive tools for preterm birth. J Matern Fetal Neonat Med. 2011;24(5): 659–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamont, RF, Dunlop, PD, Crowley, P, Levene, MI, Elder, MG. Comparative mortality and morbidity of infants transferred in utero or postnatally. J Perinat Med. 1983;11(4): 200–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fellman, V, Hellstrom-Westas, L, Norman, M, et al. One-year survival of extremely preterm infants after active perinatal care in Sweden. JAMA. 2009;301(21): 2225–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Roberts, D, Dalziel, S. Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;3: CD004454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afors, K, Chandraharan, E. Use of continuous electronic fetal monitoring in a preterm fetus: clinical dilemmas and recommendations for practice. J Pregnancy. 2011; 848794. doi: 10.1155/2011/848794.Google Scholar
Alfirevic, Z, Milan, SJ, Livio, S. Caesarean section versus vaginal delivery for preterm birth in singletons. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;9: CD000078.Google Scholar
Bergenhenegouwen, LA, Meertens, LJ, Schaaf, J, et al. Vaginal delivery versus caesarean section in preterm breech delivery: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reproduct Biol. 2014;172: 16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogberg, U, Holmgren, PA. Infant mortality of very preterm infants by mode of delivery, institutional policies and maternal diagnosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(6): 693700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aberg, K, Norman, M, Ekeus, C. Preterm birth by vacuum extraction and neonatal outcome: a population-based cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14: 42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ingemarsson, I. Tocolytic therapy and clinical experience: combination therapy. BJOG. 2005;112(suppl. 1): 8993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langhoff-Roos, J, Kesmodel, U, Jacobsson, B, Rasmussen, S, Vogel, I. Spontaneous preterm delivery in primiparous women at low risk in Denmark: population based study. BMJ. 2006;332(7547): 937–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conde-Agudelo, A, Romero, R. Antenatal magnesium sulfate for the prevention of cerebral palsy in preterm infants less than 34 weeks’ gestation: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(6): 595609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyle, LW, Crowther, CA, Middleton, P, Marret, S. Antenatal magnesium sulfate and neurologic outcome in preterm infants: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(6): 1327–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ACOG. Committee opinion no. 455: magnesium sulfate before anticipated preterm birth for neuroprotection. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(3): 669–71.Google Scholar
Lamont, CD, Jorgensen, JS, Lamont, RF. The safety of tocolytics used for the inhibition of preterm labour. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2016, May 9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×