Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T19:21:28.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2021

Fran Amery
Affiliation:
University of Bath
Get access

Summary

The parliamentary politics of abortion cannot now be neatly arranged around the twin poles of ‘pro-life’ and ‘pro-choice’ – but they never could. The Abortion Act 1967 did not, and was never meant to, establish a ‘right to choose’ in law. Instead, it was meant as a partial fix to social problems including poverty, poor housing, and ‘overlarge’ families with tired mothers, but also ‘problem’ families, ‘unfit’ mothers, and ‘delinquent’ children. This was to be achieved not by liberating women to exercise their reproductive rights, but by engaging medical professionals as social agents and delivering (especially working-class) women into their care and control. The passage of the Act relied heavily on the dual image of doctors as socially responsible and of women seeking abortions as vulnerable and in need of paternal guidance.

This has funnelled discussions in a particular way, ultimately producing debates on abortion that are not about ‘life’ versus ‘choice’. Debates have instead hinged on questions of the meaning of ‘health’, the appropriate role of doctors in the governance of ‘social’ concerns, and the correct way to ‘protect’ women often conceived of as vulnerable. Attempts to further restrict abortion rights have rarely been made on the basis of the ‘right to life’ of the unborn, but rather on the basis that abortions are somehow harming women, while doctors are being corrupted by their role in performing them. In the wake of allegations that some women are selectively aborting female foetuses, some have asked questions about the appropriateness of ‘choice’ as a model for making sense of abortion.

Abortion rights advocacy in context

British abortion law is something of an anomaly in requiring such a great level of medical control over abortion (Cooper, 2016: 50– 5). Many European countries allow abortion on request; that is, without the need for medical grounds to be met. On the other hand, in countries where this is the case, it is usually much harder to access abortion after a certain point in pregnancy (usually 12 weeks’ gestation). This has allowed participants in the abortion debate to claim, variously, that the UK has some of the most restrictive abortion laws in Europe and that it has some of the most permissive.

Type
Chapter
Information
Beyond Pro-life and Pro-choice
The Changing Politics of Abortion in Britain
, pp. 177 - 192
Publisher: Bristol University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusion
  • Fran Amery, University of Bath
  • Book: Beyond Pro-life and Pro-choice
  • Online publication: 10 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529205367.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusion
  • Fran Amery, University of Bath
  • Book: Beyond Pro-life and Pro-choice
  • Online publication: 10 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529205367.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusion
  • Fran Amery, University of Bath
  • Book: Beyond Pro-life and Pro-choice
  • Online publication: 10 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529205367.008
Available formats
×