Bibliography

Angelika Malinar

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511488290.007

Aṅguttara Nikāya 1961. The Aṅguttara-Nikāya, ed. A. K. Warder. London: Pali Text Society.

Apte, P. 1972. ‘Claim of Pāñcarātra on Bhagavadgītā’, ABORI 53: 200–203.Google Scholar

Arapura, J. G. 1975. ‘The Upside Down Tree of the Bhagavadgītā ch. xv – An Exegesis’, Numen 22: 131–144.Google Scholar

Assmann, J. 1986. ‘Arbeit am Polytheismus. Die Idee der Einheit Gottes und die Entfaltung des theologischen Diskurses in Ägypten’, in Stietencron, H. v., ed., Theologen und Theologien in verschiedenen Kulturkreisen: 49–69. Düsseldorf: Patmos.Google Scholar

1993. Monotheismus und Kosmotheismus. Ägyptische Formen eines ‘Denkens des Einen’ und ihre europäische Rezeptionsgeschichte. Heidelberg: Winter.

1996. ‘Translating Gods: Religion as a Factor of Cultural (Un)Translatability’, in Budick, S. and Iser, W., eds., The Translatability of Cultures. Figurations of the Space Between: 25–36. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Aṣṭādhyāyī, 1839–40. Pāṇini's acht Bücher grammatischer Regeln. Herausgegeben und erläutert von Otto Böhtlingk. Bonn: König.Google Scholar

Arthaśāstra, 1960–63. The Kauṭilya Arthaśāstra. Part 1: A Critical Edition with a Glossary. Part 2: An English Translation with Critical and Explanatory Notes by R. P. Kangle. Bombay: University of Bombay.Google Scholar

Atharvaveda 1865. Atharva Veda Sanhita herausgegeben von R. Roth und W. D. Whitney, i: Text. Berlin.

Bailey, G. M. 1983a. The Mythology of Brahmā. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar

1983b. ‘Suffering in the Mahābhārata. Draupadī and Yudhiṣṭhira’, Puruṣārtha 7: 109–129.

1984. ‘On D. D. Kosambi's Interpretation of the Bhagavadgītā’, IT 12: 343–353.

1985. Materials for the Study of Ancient Indian Ideologies: Pravṛtti and Nivṛtti. Torino: Jollygrafica.

1987. ‘Narrative Coherence in the Upāsanākhaṇḍa of the Gaṇeśa Purāṇa: the Interlocutory System’, IT 14: 29–45.

Bailey, G. M., and Mabbett, I. 2003. The Sociology of Early Buddhism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bakker, H. 1982. ‘On the Origin of Sāṃkhya Psychology’, WZKS 26: 117–148.Google Scholar

2001. ‘Sources for Reconstructing Ancient Forms of Śiva Worship’, in F. Grimal, ed., Les sources et le temps. Sources and Time: 397–412. Pondichéry: Institute Français de Pondichéry.

Banerjee, P. 1953. ‘Some Observations on the So-Called Theory of the Brahmanical Revolution under Puṣyamitraśuṅga’, JASBeng, Letters 29: 145–149.Google Scholar

1954. ‘Some Observations on the Interpretation of the Pāṇini Sūtra Vāsudevārjunābhyām-vun and the Antiquity of the Bhāgavatas’, JBRS 40: 74–79.

Barua, P. R. 1956. ‘The Brahmin Doctrine of Sacrifice and Rituals in the Pali Canon’, Journal of the Asiatic Society of Pakistan 1: 87–106.Google Scholar

Basham, A. L. 1981. ‘The Evolution of the Concept of the Boddhisattva’, in Kawamura, L. S., ed., The Bodhisattva Doctrine in Buddhism: 19–59. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar

Behler, E. 1968. ‘Das Indienbild der deutschen Romantik’, Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift NF 28, 1: 21–37.Google Scholar

Belvalkar, S. K. 1929. Shree Gopal Basu Mallik Fellowship Lectures on Vedānta Philosophy. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Institute.Google Scholar

1937. ‘Miscarriage of the Attempted Stratification of the Bhagavadgītā’, JUB 5: 66–133.

1939. ‘The Bhagavadgītā “Riddle” Unriddled’, ABORI 19: 335–348.

Berg, Richard A. 1987. ‘Theories of Action in the Bhagavad-Gītā’, in A. Sharma 1987: 36–50.

Bhandare, S. 2006. ‘Numismatics and History. The Maurya-Gupta Interlude in the Gangetic Plain’, in Olivelle 2006: 67–112.CrossRef

Bhandarkar, D. R. 1913–14. ‘Excavations at Besnagar’, ASIAR186–226.Google Scholar

Bhandarkar, R. G. 1874. ‘Allusions to Kṛṣṇa in Patañjali's Mahābhāsya’, IA 3: 14–16.Google Scholar

1910. ‘Vāsudeva of Pāṇini 4.3.98’, JRAS: 168–170.

1913. Vaiṣṇavism, Shaivism and Minor Religious Systems. Strassburg: Trübner.

Bhargava, P. L. 1977. ‘Additions and Interpolations in the Bhagavadgītā’, EW 27: 357–361.Google Scholar

1979. ‘Names and Epithets of Kṛṣṇa in the Bhagavadgītā’, IT 7: 93–96.

Bhattacharjee, U. C. 1925–26. ‘The Evidence of Pāṇini on Vāsudeva Worship’, IHQ 1: 483–489; 2: 409–410, 865.Google Scholar

Bhusari, R. M. 1927. ‘A Short Note on the Term Bhakti in Pāṇini's Sūtras iv.3.95–100’, ABORI 8: 198–199.Google Scholar

Biardeau, M. 1965. ‘Ahaṃkāra, The Ego Principle in the Upaniṣads’, CIS 8: 1–18.

1976. ‘Etudes de mythologie hindoue IV’, BEFEO 63: 111–262.

1978. ‘Etudes de mythologie hindoue V’, BEFEO 65: 87–237.

1981. ‘The Salvation of the King in the Mahābhārata’, CIS NS 15: 75–97.

1991. ‘Nara et Näräyaṇa’, WZKS 35: 75–108.

1997. ‘Some Remarks on the Links between the Epics, the Purāṇas, and Their Vedic Sources’, in Oberhammer, G., ed., Studies in Hinduism. Vedism and Hinduism: 69–177. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Biardeau, M., and Ch. Malamoud, 1976. Le sacrifice dans l'Inde ancienne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Bigger, A. 1997. Balarāma im Mahābhārata: seine Darstellung im Rahmen des Textes und seiner Entwicklung. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Bloch, J. 1950. Les inscriptions d'Aśoka, traduites et commentées. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Bodewitz, H. W. 2002. ‘Where and What is the priyäm dhäma’ of a Vedic God?’, IIJ 45: 153–171.CrossRef

Böhtlingk, O. 1897. ‘Bemerkungen zur Bhagavadgītā’, Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Königlich-Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Philologisch-Historische Classe 49: 1–16.Google Scholar

Bongard-Levin, G. M. 1985. Mauryan India. New Delhi: Sterling.Google Scholar

Brockington, J. L. 1984. Righteous Rāma. The Evolution of an Epic. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

1998. The Sanskrit Epics. Leiden: Brill.

Bronkhorst, J. 1993. Two Traditions of Meditation in Ancient India. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar

Brückner, H. et al., eds. 2003. Indien-Forschung im Zeitenwandel. Analysen und Dokumente zur Indologie und Religionswissenschaft in Tübingen. Tübingen: Attempto.Google Scholar

Buddhacarita 1984. The Buddhacarita, or, Acts of the Buddha ed. and trans. E. H. Johnston. 2 parts. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

Buitenen, J. A. B. 1957a. ‘Studies in Sāṃkhya Ⅱ: Ahaṃkāra’, JAOS 77: 15–25.Google Scholar

1957b. ‘Studies in Sāṃkhya Ⅲ. Sattva’, JAOS 77: 88–107.

1959. ‘Akṣara’, JAOS 79: 176–187.

1962. The Maitrāyaṇīya Upaniṣad. A Critical Essay, with Text, Translation and Commentary. 's-Gravenhage: Mouton.

1964. ‘The Large Ātman’, HR 4: 103–114.

1965. ‘A Contribution to the Critical Edition of the Bhagavadgītā’, JAOS 85: 99–109.

ed. and trans. 1973–78. The Mahābhārata, Vols. i–iii. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

1981. The Bhagavadgītā in the Mahābhārata. Text and Translation. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Bühnemann, G. 1988. Puja. A Study in Smärta Ritual. Vienna: de Nobili Research Publications.

Callewaert, W., and Hemraj, S. 1983. Bhagavadgītānuvāda. A Study in Transcultural Translation. Ranchi: Satya Bharati.Google Scholar

Chanda, R. 1920. Archaeology and Vaiṣṇava Tradition. Calcutta: Archaeological Survey of India.Google Scholar

1929. ‘Puṣyamitra and the Śuṅga Empire’, IHQ 5: 393–407, 587–613.

Charpentier, J. 1930. ‘Some Remarks on the Bhagavadgītā’, IA 59: 46–40, 77–80, 101–105, 121–126.Google Scholar

Chattopadhyaya, B. D. 1989. ‘Mathurā from the Śuṅga to the Kuṣāṇa Period. A Historical Outline’, in Srinivasan 1989a: 19–28.

Choudhury, M. C. 1964. ‘Besnagar Garuda Pillar Inscription of Heliodorus. An Assessment’, VIJ 2: 334–343.Google Scholar

Coomaraswamy, A. K. 1942. Spiritual Authority and Temporal Power in the Indian Theory of Government. New Haven: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar

Cort, J. E. 2002. ‘Bhakti in the Early Jain Tradition: Understanding Devotional Religion in South Asia’, HR 42: 59–86.Google Scholar

Couture, A. 2001. ‘From Viṣṇu's Deeds to Viṣṇu's Play, or Observations on the Word Avatāra as a Designation for the Manifestations of Viṣṇu’, JIP 29: 313–326.Google Scholar

Dahlmann, J. 1895. Das Mahābhārata als Epos und Rechtsbuch. Berlin: Dames.

Dandekar, R. N. 1963. ‘Hinduism and the Bhagavadgītā. A Fresh Approach’, JOIB 12: 232–237.Google Scholar

1975–76. ‘The Beginnings of Vaiṣṇavism’, IT3–4: 169–186.

Dasgupta, S. 1952. ‘The Philosophy of the Bhagavad-gītā’, in S. Dasgupta, A History of Indian Philosophy, ii: 437–552. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

De, S. K. 1942. ‘The Vedic and the Epic Kṛṣṇa’, IHQ 18: 297–301.Google Scholar

Deshpande, M. M. 1991. ‘The Epic Context of the Bhagavadgītā’, in Sharma, A., ed., Essays on the Mahābhārata: 334–348. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Deussen, P. 1911. Der Gesang des Heiligen. Leipzig: Brockhaus.Google Scholar

Deussen, P., and Strauss, O.. 1922. Vier philosophische Texte aus dem Mahābhārata. Leipzig: Brockhaus.Google Scholar

Devasthali, G. V. 1954. ‘Bhagavad-gītä and Upaniṣads’, in J. N. Agrawal and B. D. Shastri, eds., Sarūpa-bhäratī or the Homage of Indology: 132–142. Hoshiarpur: Vishveshvarananda Indological Institute.

Dhadpale, M. G. 1978. ‘Two Notes on the Bhagavadgītä’, in M. G. Dhadpale, ed., Principle V. A. Apte Commemoration Volume: 48–58. Poona: Deccan Education Service.

Dhammapada 1931. The Minor Anthologies of the Pali Canon. Part Ⅰ: Dhammapada: Verses on Dhamma and Khuddaka-Päṭha: The Text of the Minor Sayings Re-edited and Translated by Mrs. Rhys Davis. London: Pali Text Society.

Dīgha Nikāya 1947. The Dīgha Nikāya. ed. T. W. Rhys Davids and E. Carpentier. London: Pali Text Society.

Divanji, P. C. 1950. ‘Bhagavadgītā and Aṣṭādhyāyī’, ABORI 30: 263–276.Google Scholar

1958–59. ‘Brahman and the Terms Allied to it in the Bhagavadgītā’, JOIB 8: 369–377.

1961–62. ‘Atman and the Terms Allied to it in the Bhagavadgītā’, JOIB 11: 157–165.

Sa, D’ F. X. 1980. ‘Dharma as Delight in Cosmic Welfare: A Study of dharma in the Gītā’, Biblebhashyam: 335–357.Google Scholar

1982. ‘Zur Eigenart des Bhagavadgītā-Theismus’, in Oberhammer, G., ed., Offenbarung als Heilserfahrung: 97–125. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Dumont, L. 1960. ‘World Renunciation in Indian Religions’, CIS 4: 33–62.Google Scholar

Edgerton, F. 1924. ‘The Meaning of Sāṃkhya and Yoga’, AJP 45: 1–65.Google Scholar

1925. The Bhagavad Gītā or Song of the Blessed or India's Favorite Bible. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

1926–27. ‘The Hour of Death’, ABORI 8: 219–249.

1932. ‘Review of F. Otto Schrader, The Kashmir Recension of the Bhagavadgītā’, JAOS 53: 68–75.

1933. ‘Jñāna and Vijñāna’, in Stein, O. and Gampert, W., eds., Festschrift Moriz Winternitz. 1863 – 23. Dezember – 1933: 217–220. Leipzig: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

1940. ‘Review of “The Original Gītā: The Song of the Supreme Exalted One” by Rudolf Otto, translated and edited by J. E. Turner’, Review of Religion 4: 448.

1944. The Bhagavad Gītā. Text and Translation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

1965. The Beginnings of Indian Philosophy. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

Eliade, M. 1970. Yoga: Immortality and Freedom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Emeneau, M. B. 1949. ‘The Strangling Fig Trees in Sanskrit Literature’, University of California Publications in Classical Philology 10: 345–370.Google Scholar

1968. ‘Bhagavadgītā Notes’, in Mélanges d'Indianism à la mémoire de Louis Renou: 269–278. Paris: Institute de la Civilisation Indienne.

Falk, H. 2003. Schrift im alten Indien. Ein Forschungsbriecht mit Anmerkungen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

1994. ‘Von Götterfiguren und menschlichen Göttern’, in Balbir, N. and Bautze, K. K., eds., Festschrift Klaus Bruhn: 313–333. Reinbek: Wezler.Google Scholar

2006a. ‘The Tidal Waves of Indian History. Between Empires and Beyond’, in Olivelle, 2006: 145–166.Google Scholar

2006b. AŚokan Sites and Artefacts. A Source-Book with Bibliography. Mainz: von Zabern.

Filliozat, J. 1973. ‘Représentations de Vāsudeva et Saṃkarṣaṇa au siècle Ⅱe avant J. C.’, Arts Asiatiques 26: 113–123.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, J. L. 2002. ‘Nun Befuddles King, Shows Karmayoga Does Not Work. Sulabhā's Refutation of King Janaka at MBh 12.308’, JIP 30: 641–677.

trans. and ed. 2004. The Mahābhārata. vii: Book 11: The Book of the Women, Book 12: The Book of Peace, Part 1. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

2006. ‘Negotiating the Shape of “Scripture”. New Perspectives on the Development and Growth of the Mahābhārata between the Empires’, in Olivelle 2006: 257–286.

Folkert, K. W. 1989. ‘Jaina Religious Life at Ancient Mathurā: The Heritage of Late Victorian Interpretation’, in Srinivasan 1989a: 103–112.

Frauwallner, E. 1926. ‘Untersuchungen zu den älteren Upaniṣaden’, ZII 4: 1–45.Google Scholar

Garbe, R. 1921. Die Bhagavadgītā. Leipzig: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

1922. ‘Noch einmal das Bhagavadgītā-Problem’, DLZ 43: 97–104.

Gauchhwal, B. S. 1958. A Comparative Study of the Ethical Teachings of Kant and the Bhagavadgītā. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar

Gethin, R. 1997. ‘Cosmology and Meditation: From the Aggaṇṇa-Sutta to the Mahāyāna’, HR 36: 183–217.Google Scholar

Ghosh, J. C. 1933. ‘Notes on the Ghoṣūndī Stone Inscription’, IHQ 9: 799–801.Google Scholar

Ghosh, N. N. 1943. ‘Did Pusyamitra Sunga Persecute the Buddhists?’, PIHC: 109–116.Google Scholar

Gitomer, D. 1992. ‘King Duryodhana: The Mahābhārata Discourse of Sinning and Virtue in the Epic and Drama’, JAOS 112, 2: 222–232.Google Scholar

Glasenapp, H. von 1954. Buddhismus und Gottesidee. Die buddhistische Lehre von den überweltlichen Wesen und Mächten und ihre religionsgeschichtlichen Parallelen. Wiesbaden: Steiner.

Gokhale, B. G. 1966. ‘Early Buddhist Kingship’, JASt 26, 1: 15–22.Google Scholar

Gonda, J. 1954. ‘Pratiṣṭhā’, in J. Gonda, Selected Studies, ii: 338–372. Leiden: Brill.

1955. ‘Reflections on Sarva- in Vedic texts’, Indian Linguistics 16: 55–71.

1957. Some Observations on the Relations between ‘Gods’ and ‘Powers’ in the Veda à propos of the Phrase Sūnuḥ Sahasaḥ. 'S-Gravenhage: Mouton.

1958. ‘The “Original” Sense and the Etymology of Skt. Māyā’, in Gonda, J., Four Studies in the Language of the Veda: 119–194. 's-Gravenhage: Mouton.Google Scholar

1959a. Stylistic Repetition in the Veda. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers.

1959b. ‘The Sacred Character of Ancient Indian Kingship’, Supplement to Numen 4: 172–180.

1963. The Vision of the Vedic poets. The Hague: Mouton.

1965. Change and Continuity in Indian Religion. Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.

1966. Ancient Indian Kingship from the Religious Point of View. Leiden: Brill.

1967. The Meaning of the Sanskrit Term ‘Dhāman-’. 's-Gravenhage: Mouton.

1968. ‘The Concept of a Personal God in Ancient Indian Religious Thought’, Studia Missionalia 17: 111–136.

1977. The Ritual Sūtras. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

Goudriaan, T. 1978. Mäyä Divine and Human. A Study of Magic and Its Religious Foundations in Sanskrit Texts. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

1992. ‘The Pluriform Ātman from the Upaniṣads to Svacchanda Tantra’, WZKS 36: 163–186.

Gren-Eklund, G. 1984. ‘Causality and the Method of Connecting Concepts in the Upaniṣads’, IT 12: 107–119.Google Scholar

Gupta, S. P. 1978. ‘Vibhūti's of Viṣṇu as mentioned in the Epic and the Purāṇas’, Puräna 20: 131–135.

Haas, G. C. O. 1922. Recurrent and Parallel Passages in the Principal Upanishads and the Bhagavadgītā with References to Other Sanskrit Texts. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Habicht, Ch. 1970. Gottmenschentum und griechische Städte. Munich: Beck.

Hacker, P. 1960. ‘Zur Entwicklung der Avatāralehre’, WZKSO 4: 47–70.Google Scholar

1963. ‘Śraddhā’, WZKSO 7: 151–189.

1983. ‘Inklusivismus’, in Oberhammer, G., ed., Inklusivismus: 11–28. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Hara, M. 1963–64. ‘Note on Two Sanskrit Religious Terms: Bhakti and Śraddhā’, IIJ 7: 124–143.Google Scholar

1977–78. ‘Tapasvinī’, ABORI58–59: 151–159.

1979. ‘Śraddhāviveśa’, IT 7: 261–273.

Harrison, P. 1995. ‘Searching for the Origins of Early Mahayana: What Are We Looking For?’, Eastern Buddhist 22: 48–69.Google Scholar

Härtel, H. 1977. Some Results of the Excavations at Sonkh. A Preliminary Report. New Delhi: National Museum.Google Scholar

1987. ‘Archaeological Evidence on the Early Vāsudeva Worship’, in Gnoli, G., ed., Orientalia. Iosephi Tucci memoriae dicata. ii: 573–587. Rome: Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente.Google Scholar

1993. Excavations at Sonkh. 2500 Years of a Town in Mathura District. Berlin: Reimer.

Hauer, J. W. 1934. Eine indo-arische Metaphysik des Kampfes und der Tat. Die Bhagavadgītā in neuer Sicht. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar

Hazra, R. C. 1970. ‘Vāsudeva Worship as Known to Pāṇini’, OH 18: 1–45, 97–123.Google Scholar

Heesterman, J. C. 1957. The Ancient Indian Royal Consecration. The Rājasūya Described According to the Yajus Texts and annotated. 's-Gravenhage: Mouton.Google Scholar

1968. ‘Brahmin, Ritual and Renouncer’, WZKS 8: 1–31.

1985. The Inner Conflict ofTradition: Essays in Indian Ritual, Kingship, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

1993. The Broken World of Sacrifice. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Hegel, G. W. F. 1827. ‘Recension von: “Ueber die unter dem Namen Bhagavad-Gītā bekannte Episode des Mahabharata von W. v. Humboldt. Berlin, 1826”’, Jahrbücher für wissenschaftliche Kritik7–8: 51–63; 181–182: 1441–1488; 187–188: 1489–1492.Google Scholar

Hein, N. 1975. ‘Monotheism in the Bhagavadgītā: A Stylistic Clue’, in Proceedings, 12th Congress, International Association for the History of Religions: 250–260. Leiden: Brill.

1986. ‘Epic Sarvabhūtahite Rataḥ: A Byword of Non-Bhārgava Editors’, ABORI 67: 17–34.

1989. ‘Kālayavana. A Key to Mathurā's Cultural Self-Perception’, in Srinivasan 1989a: 223–235.

Hejib, A., and Young, K.. 1980. ‘Klība on the Battlefield: Towards a Reinterpretation of Arjuna's Despondency’, ABORI 61: 235–244.Google Scholar

Hill, W. D. P. 1928. The Bhagavadgītā. Translated from the Sanskrit with an Introduction and Argument and a Commentary. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hillebrandt, A. 1921. Aus Brahmanas und Upanisaden. Gedanken altindischer Philosophen übertragen und eingeleitet. Jena: Diederichs.

Hiltebeitel, A. 1976. The Ritual of Battle. Kṛṣṇa in the Mahābhārata. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

1979. ‘Kṛṣṇa in the Mahābhārata: A Bibliographical Essay’, ABORI 60: 65–107.

1984–85. ‘The Two Kṛṣṇas on One Chariot: Upaniṣadic Imagery and Epic Mythology’, HR 24: 1–26.

1989. ‘Kṛṣṇa at Mathurā’, in Srinivasan 1989a: 93–102.

2001. Rethinking the Mahābhārata. A Reader's Guide to the Education of the Dharma King. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Hoens, D. J. 1968. ‘An Excursus on Bhagavadgītā 6,11’, in Heesterman, J. C. et al., eds., Pratidānam. Indian, Iranian and Indo-European Studies Presented to Franciscus Bernardus Jacobus Kuiper on His Sixtieth Birthday: 523–532. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Hornung, E. 1971. Der Eine und die Vielen. Altägyptische Gottesvorstellungen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Holtzmann, A. 1892–95. Das Mahābhārata und seine Theile, 4 vols. Kiel: Haeseler.Google Scholar

Hopkins, E. W. 1895. The Religions of India. Boston, MA: Ginn.

1901. ‘Yoga Technique in the Great Epic’, JAOS 22: 333–379.

1902. The Great Epic of India. Its Character and Origin. New York: Scribner's.

1911. ‘The Epic Use of Bhagavat and Bhakti’, JRAS: 727–738.

1931. ‘The Divinity of Kings’, JAOS 51: 309–319.

Hufnagel, U. 2003. ‘Religionswissenschaft und indische Religionsgeschichte in den Arbeiten Jakob Wilhelm Hauers: Wissenschaftskonzept und politische Orientierung’, in Brückner et al.: 145–174.

Hultzsch, E. 1925. Inscriptions of AŚoka. New edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Humboldt, W. v. 1826a. ‘Über die unter dem Namen Bhagavad-Gītā bekannte Episode des Maha-Bharata’, Abhandlungen der historisch-philologischen Klasse der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin. Aus dem Jahre 1825: 1–64. Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

1826b. ‘Ueber die Bhagavad-Gītā. Mit Bezug auf die Beurteilung der Schlegelschen Ausgabe im Pariser Asiatischen Journal. Aus einem Briefe des Herrn Staatsminister von Humboldt. Nebst einer Vorerinnerung des Herausgebers’, Indische Bibliothek 2: 218–258; 3: 338–372.

Huntington, J. C. 1989. ‘Mathurä Evidence for the Early Teachings of Mahäyäna’, in Srinivasan 1989a: 85–92.

Ingalls, D. H. H. 1959. ‘ätmanātmānam’, in Vogel, C., ed., Jñānamuktāvalī: Commemoration Volume in Honour of Johannes Nobel, on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday Offered by Pupils and Colleagues: 101–110. New Delhi: International Academy of Indian Culture.Google Scholar

Irwin, J. 1975–76. ‘The Heliodorus Pillar at Besnagar’, Puratattva 8: 166–176.Google Scholar

Jacobi, H. 1918. ‘Über die Einfügung der Bhagavadgītā im Mahābhārata’, ZDMG 72: 323–327.Google Scholar

1921. ‘Die Bhagavadgītā’, DLZ 42: 715–724.

1922. ‘Weiteres zum Bhagavadgītā-Problem’, DLZ 43: 265–273.

Jaiswal, S. 1967. The Origin and Development of Vaiṣṇavism, Delhi: Munsihram Manoharlal.

Ježic, M. 1979a. ‘The First Yoga Layer in the Bhagavadgītā’, in J. P. Sinha, ed., Ludwik Sternbach Felicitation Volume: ii: 545–557. Lucknow: Akhila Bharatiya Parishad.Google Scholar

1979b. ‘Textual Layers of the Bhagavadgītā as Traces of Indian Cultural History’, in Morgenroth, W., ed., Sanskrit and World Culture: 628–638. Weimar: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar

Johnston, E. H. 1930. ‘Some Sāṃkhya and Yoga Conceptions of the Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad’, JRAS: 855–878.Google Scholar

1937. Early Sāṃkhya. London: Royal Asiatic Society.

Kalyanov, V. I. 1979. ‘On Kṛṣṇa's Diplomatics in the Mahābhārata’, IT 7: 299–308.Google Scholar

Kapoor, J. C. 1983. Bhagavad-gītā: An International Bibliography of 1785–1979 Imprints. New York: Garland.Google Scholar

Karmarkar, A. P. 1950. ‘Brahma-Nirvāṇa in the Bhagavadgītā’, ABORI 31: 305–306.Google Scholar

Karmarkar, R. D. 1950. ‘Bhagavadgītā xvi. 8 Asatyampratiṣṭhaṃ Te’, ABORI 31: 132–137.Google Scholar

Katz, R. C. 1989. Arjuna in the Mahābhārata: Where Krishna Is, There Is Victory. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Keller, C.-A. 1971. ‘Violence et dharma, chez Asoka et dans la Bhagavadgita’, AS 25: 175–201.Google Scholar

Khair, G. S. 1969. Quest for the Original Gītā. Bombay: Somaiya.Google Scholar

Kibe, M. V. 1941. ‘Two Conundrums in the Bhagavadgītā explained’, ABORI 22: 79–84.

Kirste, J. 1900. ‘Zur Mahābhāratafrage’, Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 14: 214–224.Google Scholar

Köhler, H.-W. 1948. ‘Śrad-dha in der vedischen und altbuddhistischen Literatur’. Göttingen: Universität Göttingen (dissertation).Google Scholar

Kosambi, D. D. 1962. ‘Social and Economic Aspects of the Bhagavad-Gītā’, in Kosambi, D. D., Myth and Reality. Studies in the Formation of Indian Culture: 12–41. Bombay: Popular Prakashan.Google Scholar

1978. ‘The Historical Development of the Bhagavad-Gītā’, in Chattopadhyaya, D., ed., Studies in the History of Indian philosophy, i: 242–266. Calcutta: Bagchi.Google Scholar

Koselleck, R. 1979. Vergangene Zukunft. Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Krishnamurti, S. B. N. 1930. ‘The Grammar of the Gītā: A Vindication’, ABORI 11: 284–299.Google Scholar

Krishnan, Y. 1954. ‘Was There Any Conflict between the Brahmanas and the Buddhists?’, IHQ 30: 167–173.Google Scholar

Raja, Kunhan C. 1946. ‘Bhagavadgītā and the Mīmāṃsā’, ALB 10: 9–22.Google Scholar

Lacombe, O. 1968. ‘Jñānam Savijñānam’, in Mélanges d'Indianisme à la memoire de Louis Renou: 493–443. Paris: Institute de la Civilisation Indienne.

Laine, James W. 1989. Vision of God. Narratives of Theophany in the Mahābhārata. Vienna: De Nobili Research Publications.Google Scholar

Lamotte, E. 1929. Notes sur la Bhagavadgītā. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

1958. Histoire du Bouddhisme Indien des origines à l'ère śaka. Louvain: Publications de L'Institute Orientaliste.

Langlois, A. 1824–25. ‘Bhagavad-Gītā, id est thespesion melos, etc. traduit par M. A. G. de Schlegel. Critique Littéraire’, JA 4: 105–116, 236–252; 5: 240–252.

Larson, G. J. 1979. Classical Sāṃkhya. An Interpretation of Its History and Meaning. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar

1981. ‘The Song Celestial: Two Centuries of the Bhagavad Gītā in English’, PEW 31: 513–541.

Latacz, J. 1979. Homer: Tradition und Neuerung. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Law, N. N. 1933. ‘The Political Significance of the Madhyama and the Udāsīna’, IHQ 9: 770–783.Google Scholar

Leitzmann, A., ed. 1908. Briefwechsel zwischen Wilhelm von Humboldt und August Wilhelm Schlegel. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Lévi, S. 1917. ‘Tato Jayam Udīrayet’, in R. G. Bhandarkar Commemoration Volume: 99–106. Delhi: Bharatiya.Google Scholar

Lohuizen-de Leeuw, J. E. van. 1972. ‘Gandhāra and Mathura [sic]: Their Cultural Relationship’, in Pal, P., ed., Aspects of Indian Art: 27–43. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Lüders, H. 1938–39. ‘Seven Brahmi Inscriptions from Mathura and Its Vicinity’, EI 24: 194–210.Google Scholar

1961. Mathurā Inscriptions. Unpublished Papers Edited by Klaus Janert. Göttingen: Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen. Philologisch-Historische Klasse. Dritte Folge, Nr. 47.

Macdonald, G. 1955. ‘The Hellenic Kingdoms of Syria, Bactria and Parthia’, in Rapson 1955: 384–419.

Mahābhāṣya, 1880–85. The Vyākarana-Mahābhāshya of Patanjali, ed. F. Kielhorn, i–iii. Nachdruck der Ausgabe von 1880–1885: Osnabrück, 1970.

Mahābhārata, 1933–59. The Mahābhārata for the First Time Critically Edited, i–xviii. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Institute.

Mainkar, T. G. 1965. ‘The Early Antecedents of the Vibhūti-yoga in the Bhagavadgītā ch. x’, in Gajendragadkar, S. N., ed., H. D. Velankar Commemoration Volume: 72–75. Bombay: Velankar Committee.Google Scholar

1978. ‘Some Thoughts on the Brahmasūtras and the Bhagavadgītā’, ABORI58–59: 745–755.

Malamoud, Ch. 1968. ‘Un dieu védique: le Courroux: “manyuḥ svayaṃbhūḥ”’, in Mélanges d'indianisme à la mémoire de Louis Renou: 493–507. Paris: Institute de la Civilisations Indienne.

1972. ‘Observations sur la notion de “reste” dans le brahmanisme’, WZKS 17: 6–26.

Malinar, A. 1996. Rājavidyā. Das königliche Wissen um Herrschaft und Verzicht. Studien zur Bhagavadgītā. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

1997. ‘Nārāyaṇa und Kṛṣṇa. Aspekte der Gotteslehre des Nārāyaṇīya im Vergleich zur Bhagavadgītā’, in Schreiner 1997: 241–295.

2003. ‘“Kṣatriya-Glaube” und “Opferwesen”: Richard Garbe und die Indischen Religionen’, in Brückner et al. 2003: 121–141.

2005a. ‘Blindheit und Sehen in der Erzählung des Mahābhārata’, in Luther, A., ed., Odyssee-Rezeptionen: 98–111. Frankfurt: Verlag Antike.Google Scholar

2005b. ‘How Purāṇas Relate to the Mahābhārata: The Case of King Parikṣit’, in Koskikallio, P., ed., Epics, Khilas, and Purāṇas. Proceedings of the Third Dubrovnik International Conference on Sanskrit Epics and Purāṇas, September 2002: 465–494. Zagreb: Croatian Academy of Science.Google Scholar

2007. ‘Arguments of a Queen: Draupadī's Views on Kingship’, in S. Brodbeck and B. Black, eds., Gender and Narrative in the Mahābhārata: 203–231. London: Routledge.

forthcoming. ‘Duryodhana's Truths. Kingship and Divinity in Mahābhārata 5.50’, in J. L. Brockington and P. Dundas, eds., Proceedings of the 13th World Sanskrit Conference, Edinburgh 2005. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

Mangels, A. 1994. Zur Erzähltechnik im Mahābhārata. Hamburg: Kovac.Google Scholar

Manusmṛti 1983. Manusmṛti with the Sanskrit Commentary Manvartha-Muktāvalī of Kullūka Bhaṭṭa, ed. Shastri, J. L.. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar

Marcovich, M. 1958. Bhagavadgītā. El canto del señor. Versión del sanscrito con una interpretación racional. Mérida: Universidad de los Andes.Google Scholar

Matsubara, M. 1994. Pāñcarātra Saṃhitās and Early Vaiṣṇava Theology. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar

Mazumdar, B. C. 1910. ‘Vāsudeva of Pāṇini’, JRAS: 171–179.Google Scholar

Minkowski, C. Z. 1989. ‘Janemejaya's Sattra and Ritual Structure’, JAOS 109: 401–420.Google Scholar

Mitchiner, J. E. 1982. Tradition of the Seven Ṛṣis. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar

Minor, R. N. 1980. ‘The Gītā's Way as the Only Way’, PEW 30: 339–354.Google Scholar

1982. Bhagavad-Gītā: An Exegetical Commentary. Delhi: Heritage.

1983. ‘The Quest for the Gītākāra: Multiple Authorship Revisited’, ABORI 63: 29–42.

1987. ‘Religious Experience in Bhagavadgītā Eleven and the Text's Interpretation’, in A. Sharma 1987: 138–150.

ed. 1988. Modern Interpreters of the Bhagavadgītā. Albany: SUNY.

Modi, P. M. 1932. Akṣara: A Forgotten Chapter in the History of Indian Philosophy. Baroda: State Press.Google Scholar

1933. ‘The Doctrine of the Bhagavadgītā: A Triad of the Three Dyads’, PTAIOC 7: 377–390.

1957. ‘Relation between the Bhagavadgītā and the Brahmasūtrakāra’, PTAIOC 9: 136–139.

Narain, A. K. 1957. The Indo-Greeks. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

1973. ‘Two Hindu Divinities on the Coins of Agathocles from Ai-Kharum’, Journal of the Numismatic Society of India 35: 73–77.

Nietzsche, F. 1980. Friedrich Nietzsche. Werke in sechs Bänden, ed. Karl Schlechta. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar

Nilakantam, R. 1964. ‘Prakṛti and Puruṣa in the Bhagavadgītā’, IA 3rd series 1: 254–264.Google Scholar

Oberhammer, G. 1977. Strukturen yogischer Meditation. Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.

1983. ‘Der Inklusivismus-Begriff P. Hackers. Versuch eines Nachwortes’, in Oberhammer, G., ed., Inklusivismus. Eine indische Denkform: 93–113. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Oberlies, T. 1988. ‘Die Śvetāśvatara-Upaniṣad: Eine Studie ihrer Gotteslehre’, WZKS 23: 35–62.Google Scholar

Oldenberg, H. 1909. ‘Vedische Untersuchungen’, ZDMG 63: 287–302.Google Scholar

1917. Die Religion des Veda. Stuttgart: Cotta.

1920. ‘Bemerkungen zur Bhagavadgita’, NAWG, Philologisch-historische Klasse: 321–338.

Oguibene, B. 1984. ‘Sur le terme Yoga, le verbe yuj- et quelques-uns de leurs dérivés dans les hymnes védiques’, IIJ 27: 85–101.Google Scholar

Olivelle, P. 1964. ‘The Conception of God in the Bhagavadgītā’, IPhQ 4: 514–540Google Scholar

1998. The Early Upaniṣads: Annotated Text and Translation. New York: Oxford University Press.

2004. The Law Code of Manu. A New Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

ed. 2006. Between the Empires. Society in India 300 bce to 400 ce. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Otto, R. 1934. Die Urgestalt der Bhagavad-Gītā. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar

1935a. Lehrtraktate der Bhagavad-Gītā. Tübingen: Mohr.

1935b. Der Sang des Hehr-Erhabenen. Die Bhagavad-Gītā übertragen und erläutert. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

Pal, P. 2005. ‘The Sāṃkhya Sage Kapila and Kashmiri Viṣṇu Images’, in K. A. Jacobsen, ed., Theory and Practice of Yoga: 293–302. Leiden: Brill.

Pargiter, F. E. 1913. The Purāṇa Text of the Dynasties of the Kali Age. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Pensa, C. 1969. ‘On the Purification Concept in Indian Tradition, with Special Regard to Yoga’, EW 19: 194–228.Google Scholar

Pisani, V. 1939. ‘The Rise of the Mahābhārata’, in Katre, S. M., ed., A Volume of Eastern and Indian Studies Presented to Professor F. W. Thomas: 166–176. Bombay: Karnatak Publishing.Google Scholar

Pollock, S. 1984. ‘The Divine King of the Indian Epic’, JAOS 104: 505–528.Google Scholar

Prasad, H. K. 1954. ‘Puṣyamitra Śuṅga and the Buddhists’, JBRS 40: 29–38.Google Scholar

Preciado-Solis, B. 1984. The Kṛṣṇa Cycle in the Purāṇas. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar

Proferes, T. 2007. Vedic Ideals of Sovereignty and the Poetics of Power. Cambridge, MA: American Oriental Society.

Quigley, D. ed. 2005. The Character of Kingship. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

Radhakrishnan, S. 1948. The Bhagavadgītā with an Introductory Essay, Sanskrit Text, English Translations and Notes. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Raghavan, V. 1962. ‘Rajavidya: Manu and the Bhagavadgita’, in Essays in Philosophy Presented to Dr. T. M. P. Mahadevan on His Fiftieth Birthday: 340–346. Madras: Ganesh & Co.

Rajwade, V. J. 1917. ‘The Bhagavadgītā from Grammatical and Literary Points of View’, in R. G. Bhandarkar Commemoration Volume: 325–338. Delhi: Bharatiya.Google Scholar

Rapson, E. J. ed. 1955. Ancient India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Raychaudhuri, H. 1920. Materials for the Study of the Early History of the Vaishnava Sect. Calcutta: Bhattacharya.Google Scholar

1922. ‘The Mahābhārata and the Besnagar Inscription of Heliodorus’, Journal and Proceedings of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, NS 18: 269–271.

1952. ‘India in the Age of the Nandas’, in K. N. Nilakanta Sāstri, , ed., The Age of the Nandas and Mauryas: 9–45. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar

Reynolds, F. 1972. ‘The Two Wheels of Dharma: A Study of Early Buddhism’, in F. Reynolds, ed., The Two Wheels of Dharma: Essays on Theravāda Tradition in India and Ceylon: 6–30. Cambersbur: American Academy of Religion.

Ṛgveda 1994. Rig Veda. A Metrically Restored Text with an Introduction and Notes, ed. B. van Nooten and G. Holland. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Robinson, C. A. 2005. Interpretations of the Bhagavad-Gītā and Images of Hindu Tradition. London: Routledge.

Rocher, L. 1963. ‘Bhagavadgītā 2.20 and Kaṭhopaniṣad 2.18: A New Interpretation’, ALB 27: 45–58.Google Scholar

1977. ‘The Meaning of Purāṇá in the Rgveda’, WZKS 21: 5–24.

Roy, S. C. 1941. The Bhagavadgītā and Modern Scholarship. London: Luzac.Google Scholar

Ruben, W. 1951. ‘Die Lehre vom Handeln in der Bhagavadgītā’, in Beiträge zur indischen Philologie und Altertumskunde. Walter Schubring zum 70. Geburtstag dargebracht von der deutschen Indologie: 170–179. Hamburg: de Gruyter.

Sahoo, P. C. 1988–89. ‘Priestly Abhicāra in the Śrauta Ritual’, JOI 38: 7–15.Google Scholar

Saṃyutta-Nikāya 1960. Saṃyutta Nikāya of the Sutta Piṭaka, ed. L. Feer. London: Pali Text Society.

Śatapatha-Brāhmaṇa 1882–1900. The Śatapatha-Brāhmaṇa Mādhyandina School, trans. J. Eggeling. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Scharfe, H. 1989. The State in the Indian Tradition. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Scheftelowitz, J. 1929. Die Zeit als Schicksalsgottheit in der indischen und iranischen Religion Kala und Zruvan. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar

Scheller, M. 1950. Vedisch priyà und die Wortsippe frei, freien, Freund. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Scheuer, J. 1982. Śiva dans le Mahābhārata. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Schlegel, A. W. 1826a. Bhagavadgītā id est thespesion melos sive almi crishnae et arjunae colloquium de rebus divinis. Textum recensuit, adnotationes criticas et interpretationen latinam. Editio altera auctior et emendatior cura Christiani Lasseni. Bonnae.Google Scholar

1826b. ‘Observations sur la critique du Bhagavad Gītā insérée dans le Journal Asiatique 1’, JA 9: 3–27.

Schlingloff, D. 1969. ‘The Oldest Extant Parvan-List of the Mahābhārata’, JAOS 89: 334–338.CrossRef

Schneider, U. 1982. ‘Kṛṣṇas postumer Aufstieg: zur Frühgeschichte der Bhakti-Bewegung’, Saeculum 33: 38–49.Google Scholar

Schopen, G. 1997. ‘Archaeology and Protestant Presuppositions in the Study of Indian Buddhism’, in Schopen, G., Bones, Stones and Buddhist Monks: Collected Papers on the Archaeology, Epigraphy, and Texts of Monastic Buddhism in India: 1–22. Honolulu: University of Hawai Press.Google Scholar

2005. ‘The Mahāyāna and the Middle Period in Indian Buddhism. Through a Chinese Looking-Glass’, in Schopen, G., Figments and Fragments of Mahāyāna Buddhism in India: 3–24. Honolulu: University of Hawai Press.Google Scholar

Schrader, F. O. 1902. Über den Stand der indischen Philosophie zur Zeit Mahāvīras und Buddhas. Leipzig: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

1910. ‘Über BhG ii.46’, ZDMG 64: 336–340.

1929a. ‘The Sacrificial Wheel Taught in the Bhagavadgītā’, IHQ 5: 173–181.

1929b. ‘Concerning Bhagavadgītā iii, 15’, IHQ 5: 790–791.

1930. The Kashmir Recension of the Bhagavadgītā. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

1936. Sammelbesprechung R. Otto, OLZ 39: 107–111.

1955. ‘Sāṃkhya, Original and Classical’, ALB 19: 1–2.

Schreiner, P. 1988. ‘Yoga: Lebenshilfe oder Sterbetechnik?’, Umwelt und Gesundheit3–4: 12–18.Google Scholar

1991. Bhagavad-Gita. Wege und Weisungen übersetzt und eingeleitet von Peter Schreiner. Zürich: Benzing.

ed. 1997. Studien zum Nārāyaṇīya. Studies in the Nārāyaṇīya. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

1999. ‘What Comes First in the Mahābhārata: Sāṃkhya or Yoga?’, AS 53: 755–777.

Schubring, W. 1935. Die Lehre der Jainas. Nach den alten Quellen dargestellt. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Scott, D. A. 1990. ‘The Iranian Face of Buddhism’, EW 40: 43–77.Google Scholar

Sharma, A. 1978. ‘The Role of the Anugītā in the Understanding of the Bhagavadgītā’, RS 14: 261–267.Google Scholar

1980. ‘Are Saṃnyāsa and Tyāga Synonyms in the Bhagavadgītā?’, ZDMG 130: 62–69.

ed. 1986. The Hindu Gītā: Ancient and Classical Interpretations of the Bhagavadgītā. London: Duckworth.

ed. 1987. New Essays in the Bhagavadgītā. Philosophical, Methodological and Cultural Approaches. New Delhi: Books & Books.

Sharma, R. C. 1989. ‘New Inscriptions from Mathurā’, in Srinivasan 1989a: 308–315.

Sharpe, E. J. 1985. The Universal Gītā. Western Images of the Bhagavadgītā. A Bicentenary Survey. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Shastri, M. D. 1933. ‘History of the Word “Īśvara” and Its Idea’, PTAIOC 7: 487–503.Google Scholar

Shastri, Shrikantha S. 1955. ‘The Dharma of Ashoka and the Gita’, Karnataka Darshana: 327–335.Google Scholar

Simson, G. 1968–69. ‘Die Einschaltung der Bhagavadgītā im Bhīṣmaparvan des Mahābhārata’, IIJ 11: 59–74.Google Scholar

1974. Altindische epische Schlachtbeschreibung. Untersuchungen zur Kompositions-technik und Entstehungsgeschichte der Bücher 6–9 des Mahābhārata. Göttingen Unveröffentlichte Habilitationsschrift.

1984. ‘The Mythic Background of the Mahābhārata’, IT 12: 191–223.

Sircar, D. C. 1965. Select Inscriptions Bearing on Indian History and Civilization from the Sixth Century bc to the Sixth Century ad. Calcutta: University of Calcutta.Google Scholar

Slaje, W. 1999. ‘Rājavidyā’, Studien zur Indologie und Iranistik 22: 131–166.

Smet, Richard 1977. ‘A Copernican Reversal: The Gītākāra's Reformulation of Karma’, PEW 27: 53–63.Google Scholar

Smith, B. K. 1996. ‘Ritual Perfection and Ritual Sabotage in the Veda’, HR 35: 285–306.Google Scholar

Smith, M. R. 1968. ‘Statistics of the Bhagavadgītā’, JGJRI 24: 39–46.Google Scholar

Srinivasan, D. 1981. ‘Early Kṛṣṇa Icons: The Case at Mathurā’, in Williams, J., ed., Kalā-Darśana: 127–136. New Delhi: American Institute of Indian Studies.Google Scholar

ed. 1989a. Mathurā: The Cultural Heritage. New Delhi: American Institute of Indian Studies.

1989b. ‘Vaiṣṇava Art and Iconography at Mathurā’, in Srinivasan 1989a: 383–392.

1997. Many Heads, Arms and Eyes. Origin, Meaning and Form of Multiplicity in Indian Art. Leiden: Brill.

Steinmann, R. M. 1989. ‘La notion du dharma selon Manu et dans la Bhagavadgītā’, AS 43, 2: 164–183.Google Scholar

Stenzler, A. F. 1849. Yājñavalkyadharmasūtram. Yājñavalkya's Gesetzbuch. Sanskrit und Deutsch. Berlin: Dümmler.Google Scholar

von Stietencron, H. 1998. ‘The Non-Existence of Impurity and the Legitimation of Kings’, in S. Lienhard and I. Piovano, eds., Lex et Litterae. Studies in Honour of Oscar Botto: 487–508. Turin: Edizioni dell' Orso.

2005. Hindu Myth, Hindu History. Religion, Art, and Politics. Delhi: Permanent Black.

Stietencron, H., Gietz, K.-P.Malinar, A. et al., eds. 1992. Epic and Purāṇic Bibliography up to 1985 Annotated and with Indexes, 2 vols. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Strauss, O. 1911. ‘Ethische Probleme aus dem Mahābhārata’, GSAI 24: 193–335.Google Scholar

1934. ‘Rezension von “Hauer, J. W.: Eine indo-arische Metaphysik des Kampfes und der Tat. Die Bhagavadgītā in neuer Sicht”’, DLZ 45: 2413–214.

1936. ‘Zur Interpretation der Bhagavadgītā’, Nieuw Theologisch Tijdschrift 25: 247–262.

Subrahmanyam, K. C. 1926. ‘A Note on the Evidence of Pāṇini on Vāsudeva Worship’, IHQ 2: 186–188, 864–865.

Sukthankar, V. S. 1936. ‘The Bhṛgus and the Bhārata: A Text-Historical Study’, ABORI 18: 1–76.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Bruce M. 1990. Kṛṣṇa Dvaipāyana Vyāsa and the Mahābhārata. A New Interpretation. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Szczurek, P. 2005. ‘Bhakti Interpolations and Additions in the Bhagavadgītā’, in Koskikallio, P., ed., Epics, Khilas, and Purāṇas. Proceedings of the Third Dubrovnik International Conference on Sanskrit Epics and Purāṇas, September 2002: 183–220. Zagreb: Croatian Academy of Science.Google Scholar

Tadpatrikar, S. N. 1929. ‘The Kṛṣṇa Problem’, ABORI 10: 269–344.Google Scholar

Taittirīya-Brāhmaṇa, 1859–1862. The Taittirīya Brāhmaṇa of the Black Yajur Veda with the Commentary of Sayanacharya, ed. Rājendralāla Mitra, i and ii. Calcutta: Asiatic Society.Google Scholar

Tarn, W. W. 1951. The Greeks in Bactria and India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Telang, K. T. 1882. The Bhagavadgītā, with the Sanatsujatīya and the Anugītā. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Thakur, V. K. 1982. ‘Social Roots of the Bhagavad-Gītā’, IT 10: 289–300.Google Scholar

Thapar, R. 1961. Aśoka and the Decline of the Mauryas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

1977–78. ‘Some Aspects of the Economic Data in the Mahābhārata’, ABORI58–59: 993–1007.

1979. ‘The Historian and the Epic’, ABORI 60: 199–213.

1989. ‘The Early History of Mathurā. Up to and Including the Maurya Period’, in Srinivasan 1989a: 12–18.

Thieme, P. 1952. ‘Brahman’, ZDMG 102, NF 27: 91–129.Google Scholar

Thompson, G. 1997. ‘Ahamkāra and Ātmastuti. Self-Assertion and Impersonation in the Ṛgveda’, HR 37: 141–171.Google Scholar

Tschannerl, V. 1992. Das Lachen in der altindischen Literatur. Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar

Tripathi, G. Ch. 1968. Der Ursprung und die Entwicklung der Vāmana-Legende in der indischen Literatur. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Upadhyaya, K. N. 1968. ‘The Impact of Early Buddhism on Hindu Thought with Special Reference to the Bhagavadgītā’, PEW 18: 163–173.Google Scholar

1971. Early Buddhism and the Bhagavadgītā. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

Vassilkov, Y. 1999. ‘Kālāvāda (the Doctrine of Cyclical Time) in the Mahābhārata and the Concept of Heroic Didactics’, in Proceedings of the First Dubrovnik International Conference on the Sanskrit Epics and Puranas: 17–33. Zagreb: Croatian Academy of Science.

Venis, A. 1910. ‘A Note on the Two Besnagar Inscriptions’, JRAS: 813–815.CrossRef

Venkataramayya, M. 1959–60. ‘An Inscribed Vaishnava Image of 2nd cent. bc from Malhar, Bilaspur Distric, M. P.’, JORM 29: 35–40.Google Scholar

Verardi, G. 1983. ‘The Kuṣāṇa Emperors as Cakravartins. Dynastic Art and Cults in India and Central Asia. History of a Theory, Clarifications and Refutations’, EW 33: 225–294.Google Scholar

1985. ‘Avatāraṇa: A Note on the Boddhisattva Image Dated in the Third Year of Kaniṣka in the Sārnātha Museum’, EW 35: 67–101.

Vetter, T. 1988. The Ideas and Meditative Practices of Early Buddhism. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Viennot, O. 1954. Culte de l'arbre dans l'Inde ancienne: textes et monuments brahmaniques et bouddhiques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Viṣṇusmṛti, 1881. Viṣṇusmṛti. The Institutes of Viṣṇu Together with Extracts from the Sanskrit Commentary of Nanda Paṇḍita Called Vaijayanti, ed. with critical notes, an anukramaṇika, and indexes of words and mantras by Julius Jolly. Calcutta: Asiatc Society.Google Scholar

Warder, A. K. 1970. Indian Buddhism. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar

Weber-Brosamer, W. 1988. Annam. Untersuchungen zur Bedeutung des Essens und der Speise im vedischen Ritual. Rheinfelden: Schäuble.Google Scholar

Weller, F. 1953. Versuch einer Kritik der Kaṭhopaniṣad. Berlin: Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin.Google Scholar

Wezler, A. 1978. Die wahren “Speiserestesser” Skt. vighāśin. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

2000. ‘Sampad of Bhagavadgītā XVI Reconsidered’, in R. Tsuchida and A. Wezler, eds., Harānandalaharī. Volume in Honour of Prof. M. Hara on His Seventieth Birthday: 433–455. Reinbek: Wezler.

Whillier, W. K. 1987. ‘Vision and Authority’, in Sharma 1987: pp. 151–160.

White, D. 1979. ‘Proto-Sāṃkhya and Advaita Vedānta in the Bhagavadgītā’, PEW 29: 501–507.Google Scholar

Wilden, E. 2000. Der Kreislauf der Opfergaben im Veda. Stuttgart: Steiner.

Willis, M. 2004. ‘Archaeology and the Politics of Time’, in H. T. Bakker, ed., The Vākaṭaka Heritage. Indian Culture at the Crossroads: 33–58. Groningen: Forsten.

Willson, A. L. 1964. A Mythical Image: The Ideal of India in German Romanticism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Wilkins, Ch. 1785. The Bhāgavat-Geetā, or Dialogues of Kreeshna and Arjoon in Eighteen Lectures with Notes. London.Google Scholar

Winternitz, M. 1907. ‘Rezension von P. Deussen, “Vier philosophische Texte des Mahābhārata”’, WZKM 21: 194–202.

1909. Geschichte der indischen Literatur, i. Leipzig: Brockhaus.

Yardi, M. R. 1978. ‘Theories of Multiple Authorship of the Bhagavadgītā’, ABORI58–59: 1049–1054.Google Scholar

1987. ‘Sāṃkhya and Yoga in the Mokṣadharma and the Bhagavadgītā’, ABORI 68: 309–319.

Zaehner, R. C. 1969. The Bhagavad-Gītā with a Commentary Based on the Original Sources. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar